TY - JOUR T1 - Galena MOA/Nowitna NWR earth cover classification AN - 52008108; 2003-025700 JF - BLM - Alaska Technical Report Y1 - 2002/09// PY - 2002 DA - September 2002 SP - 51 PB - U. S. Department of the Interior, Bureau of Land Management, Alaska State Office, Anchorage, AK KW - United States KW - land cover KW - imagery KW - Global Positioning System KW - Medfra Quadrangle KW - data processing KW - mapping KW - vegetation KW - geographic information systems KW - data bases KW - ecology KW - hydrology KW - West-Central Alaska KW - Ruby Quadrangle KW - satellite methods KW - biota KW - Nowitna National Wildlife Refuge KW - classification KW - Galena Military Operations Area KW - aerial photography KW - information systems KW - Alaska KW - accuracy KW - land use KW - remote sensing KW - field studies KW - 22:Environmental geology UR - http://libproxy.lib.unc.edu/login?url=http://search.proquest.com/docview/52008108?accountid=14244 L2 - http://vb3lk7eb4t.search.serialssolutions.com/?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&rfr_id=info:sid/GeoRef&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=book&rft.jtitle=&rft.atitle=&rft.au=&rft.aulast=&rft.aufirst=&rft.date=2002-09-01&rft.volume=&rft.issue=&rft.spage=&rft.isbn=&rft.btitle=Galena+MOA%2FNowitna+NWR+earth+cover+classification&rft.title=Galena+MOA%2FNowitna+NWR+earth+cover+classification&rft.issn=&rft_id=info:doi/ L2 - http://www.blm.gov/ak/st/en/info/gen_pubs/tr.html LA - English DB - GeoRef N1 - Copyright - GeoRef, Copyright 2012, American Geosciences Institute. N1 - Date revised - 2003-01-01 N1 - Number of references - 16 N1 - PubXState - AK N1 - Document feature - illus. incl. 4 tables, sketch map N1 - SuppNotes - Includes appendices N1 - Last updated - 2012-06-07 N1 - CODEN - #04969 N1 - SubjectsTermNotLitGenreText - accuracy; aerial photography; Alaska; biota; classification; data bases; data processing; ecology; field studies; Galena Military Operations Area; geographic information systems; Global Positioning System; hydrology; imagery; information systems; land cover; land use; mapping; Medfra Quadrangle; Nowitna National Wildlife Refuge; remote sensing; Ruby Quadrangle; satellite methods; United States; vegetation; West-Central Alaska ER - TY - JOUR T1 - Susitna MOA earth cover classification AN - 52007228; 2003-025688 JF - BLM - Alaska Technical Report AU - Payne, John AU - Sterrenberg, Beate AU - Macleod, Robb Y1 - 2002/09// PY - 2002 DA - September 2002 SP - 67 PB - U. S. Department of the Interior, Bureau of Land Management, Alaska State Office, Anchorage, AK KW - United States KW - thematic mapper KW - land cover KW - imagery KW - Global Positioning System KW - data processing KW - mapping KW - vegetation KW - Susitna Military Operations Area KW - relief KW - geographic information systems KW - data bases KW - ecology KW - hydrology KW - cartography KW - satellite methods KW - biota KW - Southern Alaska KW - Tyonek Quadrangle KW - habitat KW - classification KW - Talkeetna Quadrangle KW - aerial photography KW - information systems KW - Alaska KW - landscapes KW - remote sensing KW - field studies KW - 22:Environmental geology UR - http://libproxy.lib.unc.edu/login?url=http://search.proquest.com/docview/52007228?accountid=14244 L2 - http://vb3lk7eb4t.search.serialssolutions.com/?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&rfr_id=info:sid/GeoRef&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=book&rft.jtitle=&rft.atitle=&rft.au=Payne%2C+John%3BSterrenberg%2C+Beate%3BMacleod%2C+Robb&rft.aulast=Payne&rft.aufirst=John&rft.date=2002-09-01&rft.volume=&rft.issue=&rft.spage=&rft.isbn=&rft.btitle=Susitna+MOA+earth+cover+classification&rft.title=Susitna+MOA+earth+cover+classification&rft.issn=&rft_id=info:doi/ L2 - http://www.blm.gov/ak/st/en/info/gen_pubs/tr.html LA - English DB - GeoRef N1 - Copyright - GeoRef, Copyright 2012, American Geosciences Institute. N1 - Date revised - 2003-01-01 N1 - Number of references - 16 N1 - PubXState - AK N1 - Document feature - illus. incl. 3 tables, sketch maps N1 - SuppNotes - Includes appendices N1 - Last updated - 2012-06-07 N1 - CODEN - #04969 N1 - SubjectsTermNotLitGenreText - aerial photography; Alaska; biota; cartography; classification; data bases; data processing; ecology; field studies; geographic information systems; Global Positioning System; habitat; hydrology; imagery; information systems; land cover; landscapes; mapping; relief; remote sensing; satellite methods; Southern Alaska; Susitna Military Operations Area; Talkeetna Quadrangle; thematic mapper; Tyonek Quadrangle; United States; vegetation ER - TY - JOUR T1 - Tiekel earth cover classification AN - 52007075; 2003-025690 JF - BLM - Alaska Technical Report AU - Payne, John AU - Sondergaard, Mike AU - Macleod, Robb Y1 - 2002/09// PY - 2002 DA - September 2002 SP - 49 PB - U. S. Department of the Interior, Bureau of Land Management, Alaska State Office, Anchorage, AK KW - United States KW - thematic mapper KW - land cover KW - imagery KW - Global Positioning System KW - data processing KW - watersheds KW - mapping KW - vegetation KW - relief KW - Tiekel River basin KW - geographic information systems KW - data bases KW - ecology KW - hydrology KW - cartography KW - satellite methods KW - biota KW - Southern Alaska KW - habitat KW - classification KW - aerial photography KW - information systems KW - Alaska KW - landscapes KW - remote sensing KW - field studies KW - 22:Environmental geology UR - http://libproxy.lib.unc.edu/login?url=http://search.proquest.com/docview/52007075?accountid=14244 L2 - http://vb3lk7eb4t.search.serialssolutions.com/?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&rfr_id=info:sid/GeoRef&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=book&rft.jtitle=&rft.atitle=&rft.au=Payne%2C+John%3BSondergaard%2C+Mike%3BMacleod%2C+Robb&rft.aulast=Payne&rft.aufirst=John&rft.date=2002-09-01&rft.volume=&rft.issue=&rft.spage=&rft.isbn=&rft.btitle=Tiekel+earth+cover+classification&rft.title=Tiekel+earth+cover+classification&rft.issn=&rft_id=info:doi/ L2 - http://www.blm.gov/ak/st/en/info/gen_pubs/tr.html LA - English DB - GeoRef N1 - Copyright - GeoRef, Copyright 2012, American Geosciences Institute. N1 - Date revised - 2003-01-01 N1 - Number of references - 15 N1 - PubXState - AK N1 - Document feature - illus. incl. 4 tables, sketch map N1 - SuppNotes - Includes appendices N1 - Last updated - 2012-06-07 N1 - CODEN - #04969 N1 - SubjectsTermNotLitGenreText - aerial photography; Alaska; biota; cartography; classification; data bases; data processing; ecology; field studies; geographic information systems; Global Positioning System; habitat; hydrology; imagery; information systems; land cover; landscapes; mapping; relief; remote sensing; satellite methods; Southern Alaska; thematic mapper; Tiekel River basin; United States; vegetation; watersheds ER - TY - JOUR T1 - National Petroleum Reserve-Alaska earth cover classification AN - 52007035; 2003-025696 JF - BLM - Alaska Technical Report AU - Payne, John AU - Kempka, Dick Y1 - 2002/09// PY - 2002 DA - September 2002 SP - 81 PB - U. S. Department of the Interior, Bureau of Land Management, Alaska State Office, Anchorage, AK KW - United States KW - land cover KW - imagery KW - Global Positioning System KW - data processing KW - mapping KW - vegetation KW - geographic information systems KW - data bases KW - ecology KW - soils KW - hydrology KW - satellite methods KW - biota KW - National Petroleum Reserve Alaska KW - Northern Alaska KW - classification KW - aerial photography KW - information systems KW - Alaska KW - accuracy KW - land use KW - remote sensing KW - field studies KW - 22:Environmental geology UR - http://libproxy.lib.unc.edu/login?url=http://search.proquest.com/docview/52007035?accountid=14244 L2 - http://vb3lk7eb4t.search.serialssolutions.com/?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&rfr_id=info:sid/GeoRef&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=book&rft.jtitle=&rft.atitle=&rft.au=Payne%2C+John%3BKempka%2C+Dick&rft.aulast=Payne&rft.aufirst=John&rft.date=2002-09-01&rft.volume=&rft.issue=&rft.spage=&rft.isbn=&rft.btitle=National+Petroleum+Reserve-Alaska+earth+cover+classification&rft.title=National+Petroleum+Reserve-Alaska+earth+cover+classification&rft.issn=&rft_id=info:doi/ L2 - http://www.blm.gov/ak/st/en/info/gen_pubs/tr.html LA - English DB - GeoRef N1 - Copyright - GeoRef, Copyright 2012, American Geosciences Institute. N1 - Date revised - 2003-01-01 N1 - Number of references - 21 N1 - PubXState - AK N1 - Document feature - illus. incl. 12 tables, sketch maps N1 - SuppNotes - Includes appendices N1 - Last updated - 2012-06-07 N1 - CODEN - #04969 N1 - SubjectsTermNotLitGenreText - accuracy; aerial photography; Alaska; biota; classification; data bases; data processing; ecology; field studies; geographic information systems; Global Positioning System; hydrology; imagery; information systems; land cover; land use; mapping; National Petroleum Reserve Alaska; Northern Alaska; remote sensing; satellite methods; soils; United States; vegetation ER - TY - JOUR T1 - Stony River MOA earth cover classification AN - 52006715; 2003-025693 JF - BLM - Alaska Technical Report Y1 - 2002/09// PY - 2002 DA - September 2002 SP - 61 PB - U. S. Department of the Interior, Bureau of Land Management, Alaska State Office, Anchorage, AK KW - United States KW - Stony River Military Operations Area KW - thematic mapper KW - land cover KW - imagery KW - Global Positioning System KW - Medfra Quadrangle KW - data processing KW - mapping KW - vegetation KW - relief KW - Lime Hills Quadrangle KW - geographic information systems KW - data bases KW - ecology KW - hydrology KW - West-Central Alaska KW - cartography KW - Kuskokwim River KW - satellite methods KW - biota KW - Southern Alaska KW - habitat KW - classification KW - Talkeetna Quadrangle KW - aerial photography KW - information systems KW - Alaska KW - McGrath Quadrangle KW - landscapes KW - remote sensing KW - field studies KW - 22:Environmental geology UR - http://libproxy.lib.unc.edu/login?url=http://search.proquest.com/docview/52006715?accountid=14244 L2 - http://vb3lk7eb4t.search.serialssolutions.com/?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&rfr_id=info:sid/GeoRef&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=book&rft.jtitle=&rft.atitle=&rft.au=&rft.aulast=&rft.aufirst=M&rft.date=2001-01-01&rft.volume=&rft.issue=&rft.spage=214&rft.isbn=&rft.btitle=Water+Resources+Data+New+Hampshire+and+Vermont+Water+Year+2000&rft.title=Water+Resources+Data+New+Hampshire+and+Vermont+Water+Year+2000&rft.issn=&rft_id=info:doi/ L2 - http://www.blm.gov/ak/st/en/info/gen_pubs/tr.html LA - English DB - GeoRef N1 - Copyright - GeoRef, Copyright 2012, American Geosciences Institute. N1 - Date revised - 2003-01-01 N1 - Number of references - 17 N1 - PubXState - AK N1 - Document feature - illus. incl. 6 tables, sketch maps N1 - SuppNotes - Includes appendices N1 - Last updated - 2012-06-07 N1 - CODEN - #04969 N1 - SubjectsTermNotLitGenreText - aerial photography; Alaska; biota; cartography; classification; data bases; data processing; ecology; field studies; geographic information systems; Global Positioning System; habitat; hydrology; imagery; information systems; Kuskokwim River; land cover; landscapes; Lime Hills Quadrangle; mapping; McGrath Quadrangle; Medfra Quadrangle; relief; remote sensing; satellite methods; Southern Alaska; Stony River Military Operations Area; Talkeetna Quadrangle; thematic mapper; United States; vegetation; West-Central Alaska ER - TY - RPRT T1 - FISH PASSAGE IMPROVEMENT PROJECT AT THE RED BLUFF DIVERSION DAM, TEHAMA, GLENN, COLUSA COUNTIES AND YOLO COUNTIES, CALIFORNIA. AN - 36416912; 9600 AB - PURPOSE: The construction of facilities to improve anadromous fish passage at the Red Bluff Diversion Dam on the Sacramento River in California is proposed. The dam creates a reservoir that covers portions of Tehama, Gelnn, Colusa, and Yolo counties. Prior to the completion of the dam in the mid-1960s, anadromous fish enjoyed unimpeded passage through the current dam site. The dam created a barrier, impeding and delaying passage to spawning and rearing habitat upstream of the dam. The dominant feature of the dam is its gates. When the gates are lowered, the dam presents a barrier for both upstream- and downstream-migrating fish. Fish ladders, included in the original design, have proven ineffective at certain flow levels to pass anadromous fish to upstream spawning grounds. Six alternatives, including a No Action Alternative, are considered in this draft EIS. The preferred alternative, known as the Gates-out Alternative, would eliminate the gates-in period. Improved water deliveries would be achieved through a combined pumping capacity of 2,500 cubic feet per second at two sites. Improvements in fish passage would be achieved through reduction in gate operations. Existing fish latters would no longer operate. A conveyance facility across Red Bank Creek would be constructed to convey water from one of the pump stations. The project would incorporate an adaptive management plan. POSITIVE IMPACTS: The preferred alternative would substantially improve the long-term availability to reliably pass anadromous fish and other species of concern, both upstream and downstream of the dam and substantially improve the long-term ability to reliably and cost-effectively move sufficient water into the Tehama-Colusa Canal and the Corning Canal systems to meet the needs of the associated water districts. NEGATIVE IMPACTS: Project facilities would displace riparian land, freshwater marsh, and parkland, and habitat for federally protected species could be affected. One campground would be significantly affected, as would the recreational experience of users of the reservoir. LEGAL MANDATES: Endangered Species Act of 1973 (16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.). JF - EPA number: 020376, 1,477 pages and maps, August 30, 2002 PY - 2002 KW - Parks, Refuges and Forests KW - Agency number: DES 02-36 KW - Biologic Assessments KW - Canals KW - Dams KW - Diversion Structures KW - Endangered Species (Animals) KW - Fish KW - Fisheries Surveys KW - Pumping Plants KW - Recreation Resources KW - Reservoirs KW - Rivers KW - Vegetation Surveys KW - Wetlands KW - Wildlife Habitat KW - Wildlife Surveys KW - California KW - Sacramento River KW - Tehama-Colusa Canal KW - Endangered Species Act of 1973, Animals UR - http://libproxy.lib.unc.edu/login?url=http://search.proquest.com/docview/36416912?accountid=14244 L2 - http://vb3lk7eb4t.search.serialssolutions.com/?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&rfr_id=info:sid/Environmental+Impact+Statements%3A+Digests&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=report&rft.jtitle=&rft.atitle=&rft.au=&rft.aulast=&rft.aufirst=&rft.date=2002-08-30&rft.volume=&rft.issue=&rft.spage=&rft.isbn=&rft.btitle=FISH+PASSAGE+IMPROVEMENT+PROJECT+AT+THE+RED+BLUFF+DIVERSION+DAM%2C+TEHAMA%2C+GLENN%2C+COLUSA+COUNTIES+AND+YOLO+COUNTIES%2C+CALIFORNIA.&rft.title=FISH+PASSAGE+IMPROVEMENT+PROJECT+AT+THE+RED+BLUFF+DIVERSION+DAM%2C+TEHAMA%2C+GLENN%2C+COLUSA+COUNTIES+AND+YOLO+COUNTIES%2C+CALIFORNIA.&rft.issn=&rft_id=info:doi/ LA - English DB - ProQuest Environmental Science Collection N1 - Name - Department of the Interior, Bureau of Reclamation, Willow, California; DOI N1 - Date revised - 2006-05-01 N1 - SuppNotes - Draft. Preparation date: August 30, 2002 N1 - Last updated - 2011-12-16 ER - TY - RPRT T1 - NAVAJO UNIT, SAN JUAN RIVER, NEW MEXICO, COLORADO, AND UTAH. AN - 36420075; 9594 AB - PURPOSE: The implementation of modifications to the operational regime of the Navajo Dam and Reservoir on the San Juan River in Colorado, New Mexico, and Utah is proposed. Current operations of the dam and reservoir affect the habitat of two endangered fish species, namely, the razorback sucker and the Colorado pikeminnow (formerly known as the Colorado squawfish). After completion of the Navajo project in 1962, criteria governing releases of water from the dam focused primarily on meeting irrigation needs, providing flood control storage, and providing a recreational pool in the reservoir. However, native fish populations have been adversely affected or modified in part by construction and subsequent operation of the dam. In addition, Lake Powell's inundation of approximately 30 miles of the lower San Juan River has had significant impacts on native fish habitat. Introduction of non-native fish species, the past removal of native fish to create a more desirable recreational fishery, the contribution of diversion structures to these impacts, and instream channel modifications have exacerbated the impacts on the endangered species. Three alternatives, including a No Action Alternative, are considered in this draft EIS. The tentatively recommended alternative would allow water projects within the basin that have completed consultations required under the Endangered Species Act and the National Environmental Policy Act. Such projects would also be required to comply with the local requirements of various local authorities, including those governing Native American tribes. The modifications proposed would require the projects to a limit minor unspecified minor depletions to 3,000 acre-feet. The operations of the Navajo Dam would be modified to provide sufficient releases to assist in conserving endangered fish and their designated critical habitat. Releases from the dam would range from 259 cubic feet per second (cfs) to 5,000 cfs POSITIVE IMPACTS: Modification of dam operations would provide sufficient releases of water at times, quantities, and durations necessary to conserve the two endangered fish species. The newly proposed dam operations would also allow development to proceed in the San Juan River basin in compliance with applicable laws, compacts, court decrees, and American Indian trust responsibilities. The plan would allow 56,130 acres of additional land to benefit from irrigation. NEGATIVE IMPACTS: Fish habitat would be reduced an average of 34 percent in special regulation waters when flows drop from 500 to 250 cfs. Physical habitat and water quality problems would likely be significant downstream of Citizens Ditch. Impacts on the reservoir trout fishery and the downstream release regime would reduce recreational fishing and rafting opportunities, respectively. The hydropower resources of the river would be adversely affected. Vegetation along the seven miles immediately downstream of the dam would decline due to flow reductions. Wetland and riparian vegetation and cultural resource sites would be damaged somewhat due to reservoir fluctuation. Releases would continue to result in bank erosion downstream of the dam. LEGAL MANDATES: Endangered Species Act of 1973 (16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.). JF - EPA number: 020370, 247 pages, August 29, 2002 PY - 2002 KW - Parks, Refuges and Forests KW - Agency number: DES-02-35 KW - Cultural Resources KW - Bank Protection KW - Dams KW - Electric Power KW - Endangered Species (Animals) KW - Erosion KW - Farmlands KW - Fish KW - Indian Reservations KW - Irrigation KW - Recreation Resources KW - Reservoirs KW - Rivers KW - Vegetation KW - Water Quality KW - Wetlands KW - Wildlife Habitat KW - Colorado KW - New Mexico KW - San Juan River KW - Utah KW - Endangered Species Act of 1973, Animals UR - http://libproxy.lib.unc.edu/login?url=http://search.proquest.com/docview/36420075?accountid=14244 L2 - http://vb3lk7eb4t.search.serialssolutions.com/?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&rfr_id=info:sid/Environmental+Impact+Statements%3A+Digests&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=report&rft.jtitle=&rft.atitle=&rft.au=Coffin%2C+JE%3BFletcher%2C+W+L&rft.aulast=Coffin&rft.aufirst=JE&rft.date=2001-01-01&rft.volume=&rft.issue=&rft.spage=206&rft.isbn=&rft.btitle=Water+Resources+Data+for+Florida%2C+Water+Year+2000.+Volume+3B.+Southwest+Florida+Ground+Water&rft.title=Water+Resources+Data+for+Florida%2C+Water+Year+2000.+Volume+3B.+Southwest+Florida+Ground+Water&rft.issn=&rft_id=info:doi/ LA - English DB - ProQuest Environmental Science Collection N1 - Name - Department of the Interior, Bureau of Reclamation, Durango, Colorado; DOI N1 - Date revised - 2006-05-01 N1 - SuppNotes - Draft. Preparation date: August 29, 2002 N1 - Last updated - 2014-01-30 ER - TY - RPRT T1 - AMENDMENT TO THE COCONINO FOREST PLAN FOR THE FLAGSTAFF/LAKE MARY ECOSYSTEM ANALYSIS AREA, PEAKS AND MORMON LAKE RANGER DISTRICTS, COCONINO NATIONAL FOREST, COCONINO COUNTY, ARIZONA. AN - 16361357; 9592 AB - PURPOSE: An amendment to the Coconino Forest Plan with respect to the lands surrounding the city of Flagstaff, the Flagstaff Area National Park Service National Monuments, and the Lake Mary watershed in Coconino County, Arizona is proposed. The 300,423-acre study area surrounds city of Flagstaff and the communities of Doney Park, Fort Valley, Kachina Village, Forest Highlands, Lake Mary Road, and Mountainaire. It also includes the Lake Mary watershed and lands between Sunset Crater Volcano and Wupatki National Monuments. The amendment would be referenced during project-level analysis and decision-making in the future. Implementation of the desired condition described in the forest plan, including this amendment, would occur over a period of years. The proposed action would add an emphasis on fire risk reduction and recreation management for lands in close proximity to residential areas. The plan would outline objectives for recreational settings, including motorized versus nonmotorized settings, based on landscape analysis and design. Recreational settings provisions would allow for a framework for future site-specific planning and decision-making for outfitter/guide and group uses, road management, and camping. A new rock climbing direction stipulation would be added. Adjustments to wildlife cover and a redistribution of Mexican spotted owl habitat near residential areas would be included via the amendment. Language with respect to scenery, noxious weeds, land exchange, watershed management, mountain meadow and riparian area management would be clarified. The language of the amendment would emphasize continued cooperation and coordination with local, state, and federal agencies. New management areas would be delineated, with additional emphasis items and direction. Management areas would be created based on land features, biophysical characteristics, and/or the lands relationship to adjacent communities. Four alternatives, including a No Action Alternative (Alternative B), are considered in this draft EIS. POSITIVE IMPACTS: The action alternatives would improve conditions in the study area such that possible future impacts could be lessened. The distribution of wildlife habitat would be improved and the possibility of wildfire would decline significantly. The miles and distribution of roads and trails would be less over time under the action alternatives. Human disturbance of wildlife would decline significantly, though opportunities for high-quality recreational experiences would increase. NEGATIVE IMPACTS: Some wildlife habitat could be affected, particularly with respect to the amount and distribution of wildlife hiding habitat and thermal cover. The action alternatives would reduce recreational access due to reduction of road and trail mileage, and some recreational camping sites would be removed. LEGAL MANDATES: National Forest Management Act of 1976 (16 U.S.C. 1600 et seq.). JF - EPA number: 020368, 178 pages, August 28, 2002 PY - 2002 KW - Parks, Refuges and Forests KW - Birds KW - Endangered Species (Animals) KW - Fire Prevention KW - Forests KW - Land Management KW - Monuments KW - Recreation Facilities KW - Recreation Resources KW - Recreation Resources Management KW - Roads KW - Volcanoes KW - Watersheds KW - Wetlands KW - Wildlife KW - Wildlife Habitat KW - Arizona KW - Coconino National Forest KW - National Forest Management Act of 1976, Compliance UR - http://libproxy.lib.unc.edu/login?url=http://search.proquest.com/docview/16361357?accountid=14244 L2 - http://vb3lk7eb4t.search.serialssolutions.com/?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&rfr_id=info:sid/Environmental+Impact+Statements%3A+Digests&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=report&rft.jtitle=&rft.atitle=&rft.au=&rft.aulast=&rft.aufirst=&rft.date=2002-08-28&rft.volume=&rft.issue=&rft.spage=&rft.isbn=&rft.btitle=AMENDMENT+TO+THE+COCONINO+FOREST+PLAN+FOR+THE+FLAGSTAFF%2FLAKE+MARY+ECOSYSTEM+ANALYSIS+AREA%2C+PEAKS+AND+MORMON+LAKE+RANGER+DISTRICTS%2C+COCONINO+NATIONAL+FOREST%2C+COCONINO+COUNTY%2C+ARIZONA.&rft.title=AMENDMENT+TO+THE+COCONINO+FOREST+PLAN+FOR+THE+FLAGSTAFF%2FLAKE+MARY+ECOSYSTEM+ANALYSIS+AREA%2C+PEAKS+AND+MORMON+LAKE+RANGER+DISTRICTS%2C+COCONINO+NATIONAL+FOREST%2C+COCONINO+COUNTY%2C+ARIZONA.&rft.issn=&rft_id=info:doi/ LA - English DB - ProQuest Environmental Science Collection N1 - Name - Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Flagstaff, Arizona; DA N1 - Date revised - 2006-05-01 N1 - SuppNotes - Draft. Preparation date: August 28, 2002 N1 - Last updated - 2014-01-30 ER - TY - RPRT T1 - MCNARY - JOHN DAY TRANSMISSION LINE PROJECT, BENTON AND KLICKITAT COUNTIES, WASHINGTON AND UMATILLA AND SHERMAN COUNTIES, OREGON. AN - 16361305; 9586 AB - PURPOSE: The construction and operation of a 79-mile, 500-kilovolt transmission line in Benton and Klickitat counties, Washington and Umatilla and Sherman counties, Oregon is proposed. The existing lines in the area distribute power from the east side of the Cascades to the west side where electricity is in high demand, particularly in the densely populated cities along Interstate 5. These lines are presently operating at capacity. Because the Pacific Northwest has only recently recovered from a shortfall in electric energy supply and a volatile wholesale power market in which prices reached record highs, there are many new proposals for facilities to generate new power. Some of these facilities are in the vicinity of the McNary-John Day project. The new line would extend from the McNary Substation in Oregon, cross the Columbia River into Washington just north of the substation, proceed west for approximately 70 miles along the Columbia River, and recross the Columbia River into Oregon and terminate at the John Day Substation. The line would parallel existing transmission lines over its entire length and would run largely within existing rights-of-way. The towers for the new line would be 145- to 165-foot lattice steel structures with spans of 1,150 to 1,500 feet between towers. Tower footings would range from four feet by four feet to 12.5 feet by 12.5 feet. In addition to the proposed action, this EIS considers a No Action Alternative and route options for portions of the line. The route options include three 0.5-mile routes for the segment of the line extending from the McNary Substation to the Columbia River crossing; three two-mile routes where the Hanford-John Day transmission line joins the existing corridor; two 1,000-foot routes at corridor mile 32; and two 500-foot route at corridor mile 35. The routing options at miles 32 and 35 would allow the line to avoid Native American tribal lands. POSITIVE IMPACTS: The proposed line would help ensure that existing and newly generated power could move through the system. Forecasted power demands in the area would be met without risk of power interruptions due to demand becoming greater than the reliable capacity in the system. The line would also increase the reliability of the electrical grid in the region by providing an additional service line for power should there be an interruption in the operation of one of the other transmission lines in the area. NEGATIVE IMPACTS: Line construction would require displacement of vegetation, including 41 acres of cropland, 99 acres of grazing land, 25 trees from a poplar tree farm, and 50 acres of cottonwood tree plantation. The line would constitute a significant visual intrusion on the landscape, though a similar line already runs within the intended corridor. Unless the routing options at miles 32 and 35 are selected, the project would traverse tribal lands. LEGAL MANDATES: Columbia River Transmission Act (16 U.S.C. 838b(c)). PRIOR REFERENCES: For the abstract of the draft EIS, see 02-0133D, Volume 26, Number 2. JF - EPA number: 020362, Final EIS--201 pages; Draft EIS--424 pages and maps, August 23, 2002 PY - 2002 KW - Energy KW - Agency number: DOE/EIS-0332 KW - Electric Power KW - Farmlands KW - Forests KW - Grazing KW - Health Hazard Analyses KW - Indian Reservations KW - Ranges KW - Socioeconomic Assessments KW - Transmission Lines KW - Vegetation KW - Vegetation Surveys KW - Visual Resources KW - Wildlife Surveys KW - Oregon KW - Washington KW - Columbia River Transmission Act, Compliance UR - http://libproxy.lib.unc.edu/login?url=http://search.proquest.com/docview/16361305?accountid=14244 L2 - http://vb3lk7eb4t.search.serialssolutions.com/?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&rfr_id=info:sid/Environmental+Impact+Statements%3A+Digests&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=report&rft.jtitle=&rft.atitle=&rft.au=&rft.aulast=&rft.aufirst=&rft.date=2002-08-23&rft.volume=&rft.issue=&rft.spage=&rft.isbn=&rft.btitle=MCNARY+-+JOHN+DAY+TRANSMISSION+LINE+PROJECT%2C+BENTON+AND+KLICKITAT+COUNTIES%2C+WASHINGTON+AND+UMATILLA+AND+SHERMAN+COUNTIES%2C+OREGON.&rft.title=MCNARY+-+JOHN+DAY+TRANSMISSION+LINE+PROJECT%2C+BENTON+AND+KLICKITAT+COUNTIES%2C+WASHINGTON+AND+UMATILLA+AND+SHERMAN+COUNTIES%2C+OREGON.&rft.issn=&rft_id=info:doi/ LA - English DB - ProQuest Environmental Science Collection N1 - Name - Department of Energy, Bonneville Power Administration, Portland, Oregon; DOE N1 - Date revised - 2006-05-01 N1 - SuppNotes - Final. Preparation date: August 23, 2002 N1 - Last updated - 2011-12-16 ER - TY - RPRT T1 - OIL AND GAS DEVELOPMENT ON THE SOUTHERN UTE INDIAN RESERVATION, SAN JUAN BASIN, NEW MEXICO AND COLORADO. AN - 16357839; 9585 AB - PURPOSE: The implementation of a 20-year plan for the development of oil and gas resources on the Southern Ute Indian Reservation in New Mexico and Colorado is proposed. The reservation is located in the San Juan Basin, a major oil- and gas-producing area in northwestern New Mexico and southwestern Colorado. The study area under consideration encompasses 421,000 acres. Three alternatives, including a No Action Alternative (Alternative 1), are considered in this programmatic final EIS. Alternative 1 would continue current development activities, resulting in the potential drilling of 3,530 wells, including both conventional and coalbed methane (CBM) wells. Alterative 2 would allow an increase in the number of Fruitland Formation CBM wells from one well per 320 acres to two wells per 320 acres in most of the Ignacio-Blanco Field. Implementation of Alternative 2 could result in the drilling of 636 production wells, including both conventional wells and CBM wells. Alternative 3, which is preferred by both the federal authorities and the Ute Tribe, would include all developments associated with Alternative 2 as well as the addition of enhanced recovery of Fruitland CBM through injection of nitrogen, carbon dioxide, and other fluids. Implementation of Alternative 3 could result in the drilling of 70 injection wells and 636 production wells, including both conventional wells and CBM wells. Some of the injection wells could be directionally drilled from existing pads to minimize impacts and costs. Regardless of the alternative selected, some of all of the CBM wells drilled may be infill wells. POSITIVE IMPACTS: The proposed plan would provide a framework for administering future oil and gas development, ensure the long-term sustainability of resources, maintain other compatible land uses, identify new mitigation measures and/or better uses of existing mitigation measures, and enhance the autonomy and flexibility of the Ute Tribe. Employment rolls for tribe members would increase significantly. NEGATIVE IMPACTS: Vegetation would be cleared from construction of well pads, roads, pipelines, and associated facilities, but this would not represent a significant impact. Significant impacts would result if noxious weeds were not adequately managed. Noise and drilling and other activities could disturb elk winter ranges and winter concentration areas. Water depletion for the San Juan River Basin would be less than the federal 100 acre-feet per year threshold for small quantity depletions. Gas seepage at the outcrop and coal fires near the outcrop could result in losses with respect to these resources and could present a health hazard. New well pads would degrade visual aesthetics somewhat and drilling would result in high local noise levels. LEGAL MANDATES: Indian Mineral Development Act of 1982 and Indian Self-Determination and Education Assistance Act of 1968 (P.L. 93-638) PRIOR REFERENCES: For the abstract of the draft EIS, see 01-0121D, Volume 25, Number 2. JF - EPA number: 020361, Volume 1--689 pages, Volume 2--777 pages and maps, August 22, 2002 PY - 2002 KW - Energy KW - Air Quality Assessments KW - Biologic Assessments KW - Cultural Resources Surveys KW - Drilling KW - Employment KW - Health Hazard Analyses KW - Impact Assessment Methodology KW - Indian Reservations KW - Natural Gas KW - Noise KW - Oil Production KW - Pipelines KW - Roads KW - Soils Surveys KW - Traffic Analyses KW - Transportation Surveys KW - Vegetation KW - Visual Resources KW - Wells KW - Wildlife Habitat KW - Wildlife Surveys KW - Colorado KW - New Mexico KW - San Juan River Basin KW - Southern Ute Indian Reservation KW - Indian Mineral Development Act of 1982, Compliance KW - Indian Self-Determination and Education Assistance Act of 1968, Compliance UR - http://libproxy.lib.unc.edu/login?url=http://search.proquest.com/docview/16357839?accountid=14244 L2 - http://vb3lk7eb4t.search.serialssolutions.com/?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&rfr_id=info:sid/Environmental+Impact+Statements%3A+Digests&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=report&rft.jtitle=&rft.atitle=&rft.au=&rft.aulast=&rft.aufirst=&rft.date=2002-08-22&rft.volume=&rft.issue=&rft.spage=134&rft.isbn=&rft.btitle=Water+Resources+Data+for+Wyoming%2C+Water+Year+2000.+Volume+2.+Ground+Water&rft.title=Water+Resources+Data+for+Wyoming%2C+Water+Year+2000.+Volume+2.+Ground+Water&rft.issn=&rft_id=info:doi/ LA - English DB - ProQuest Environmental Science Collection N1 - Name - Department of the Interior, Bureau of Land Management, Durango, Colorado; DOI N1 - Date revised - 2006-05-01 N1 - SuppNotes - Final. Preparation date: August 22, 2002 N1 - Last updated - 2014-01-30 ER - TY - RPRT T1 - SECTION 14 MASTER DEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR THE AGUA CALIENTE BAND OF CAHUILLA INDIANS, CITY OF PALM SPRINGS, CALIFORNIA. AN - 16343614; 9583 AB - PURPOSE: The establishment of a master development/specific development plan for Section 14 of the Agua Caliente Band of the Cahuilla Indian Tribe's Reservation in the city of Palm Springs, California is proposed. The 640-acre Section 14 site, located adjacent to the downtown area, encompasses 212 acres of vacant land and 428 acres of residential, hotel, retail, office, restaurant, open space, and institutional land. The existing land ownership pattern in Section 14 is unusually complex and has resulted in a partially developed and patchy land use pattern, with development separated by vacant lots. The proposed plan would guide the future development of vacant parcels and the redevelopment of parcels already developed within the section. The Bureau of Indian Affairs would review the specific plan and approve lease agreements for individual development projects within Section 14. The city of Palm Springs must approve the specific plan, a general plan amendment, and necessary rezoning. Four alternatives, including a No Action Alternative, which would retain existing land use designations and zoning, are considered in this final EIS. The preferred action would result in the development of Section 14 as an integrated urban resort, with commercial uses concentrated in a wide area north and south of Tahquitz Canyon Way and east of Indian Canyon rive and residential uses in the northeastern and southeastern areas. The extent of commercial square footage permitted by this alternative would be greater than any of the other alternatives. Existing land use designations and rezoning would be replaced with new designations to allow greater flexibility and ease of development. Consolidation of smaller parcels would be encouraged to provide opportunities for larger, cohesive development. Specific development regulations would be similar to those current in existence but would allow greater design flexibility. Residential development would be permitted at 8, 15, and 39 units per acre, with densities of up to 86 units under certain conditions. Commercial floor area ratios would be allowed at 0.38. However, under certain conditions higher ratios could be permitted. POSITIVE IMPACTS: The plan would provide a framework for future development of Section 14 that would promote economic self-sufficiency for the members of the tribe, while supporting developing of tribal government and infrastructure. The plan would achieve the highest and best use of Indian lands, maximize ad coordinate development of the section, ensure compatibility with existing development, provide a flexible development framework, and allow for creation of the appropriate infrastructure. Significant new employment opportunities would be provided for tribe members. NEGATIVE IMPACTS: Structures and infrastructure in the area would be subject to groundshaking and liquefaction due to seismic activity. More intense use of the area would contribute to groundwater depletion problems in the Coachella Valley region. The area lies in the Salton Sea Air Basin, which is a non-attainment area for ozone and particulate matter, and the site is within the Blowsand Hazard Zone though outside the Active Blowsand Zone established by the Coachella Valley Association of Governments. Construction-related emissions would exceed state standards for nitrogen oxides and particulate matters. Construction activities could affect archaeologic and historic resources. Water supply to the site could be problematic if the rights-of-way for the local water distribution pipeline, which, at present, will expire in 2005, in fact did expire at that date. A significant number of students would be added to the Palm Springs Unified School District, placing stress on the district's educational resources. The plan would result in potential conflicts with the city's adopted plans and policies. Traffic generated by more intense use of the site would result in congestion at some intersections and increase noise and air pollution emissions. PRIOR REFERENCES: For the abstract of the draft EIS, see 02-0139D, Volume 26, Number 2. JF - EPA number: 020359, 447 pages, August 21, 2002 PY - 2002 KW - Land Use KW - Air Quality Standards Violations KW - Archaeological Sites KW - Commercial Zones KW - Earthquakes KW - Employment KW - Historic Sites KW - Hotels KW - Housing KW - Indian Reservations KW - Nitrogen Oxides KW - Open Space KW - Particulates KW - Pipelines KW - Resorts KW - Sand KW - Schools KW - Urban Development KW - Urban Renewal KW - Urban Structures KW - Water Supply KW - California UR - http://libproxy.lib.unc.edu/login?url=http://search.proquest.com/docview/16343614?accountid=14244 L2 - http://vb3lk7eb4t.search.serialssolutions.com/?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&rfr_id=info:sid/Environmental+Impact+Statements%3A+Digests&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=report&rft.jtitle=&rft.atitle=&rft.au=&rft.aulast=&rft.aufirst=&rft.date=2002-08-21&rft.volume=&rft.issue=&rft.spage=&rft.isbn=&rft.btitle=SECTION+14+MASTER+DEVELOPMENT+PLAN+FOR+THE+AGUA+CALIENTE+BAND+OF+CAHUILLA+INDIANS%2C+CITY+OF+PALM+SPRINGS%2C+CALIFORNIA.&rft.title=SECTION+14+MASTER+DEVELOPMENT+PLAN+FOR+THE+AGUA+CALIENTE+BAND+OF+CAHUILLA+INDIANS%2C+CITY+OF+PALM+SPRINGS%2C+CALIFORNIA.&rft.issn=&rft_id=info:doi/ LA - English DB - ProQuest Environmental Science Collection N1 - Name - Department of the Interior, Bureau of Indian Affairs, Washington, District of Columbia; DOI N1 - Date revised - 2006-05-01 N1 - SuppNotes - Final. Preparation date: August 21, 2002 N1 - Last updated - 2014-01-30 ER - TY - RPRT T1 - CALIFORNIA DESERT CONSERVATION AREA PLAN AMENDMENTS FOR THE NORTHERN AND EASTERN MOJAVE PLANNING AREA, AN - 36411878; 9464 AB - PURPOSE: The modification of the general management regime for the Northern and Eastern Mojave Planning Area (NEMO), currently administered under the California Desert Conservaton Area (CDCA), is proposed. The CDCA encompasses 25 million acres and contains historic, scenic, archaeological, environmental, biological, cultural, scientific, educational, recreational, and economic resources uniquely located adjacent to populated areas in southern California and southern Nevada. The 3.3-million-acre NEMO, which includes 2.4 million acres of public lands, lies in the Mojave Desert in southeastern California adjacent to the Nevada border. The proposed amendments would address the following: 1) adoption of standards of public health, with specific guidelines for livestock grazing; 2) protection of threatened and endangered (T&E) species as well s species that may be considered for listing in the reasonably forseeable future by evaluating the habitat requirements and necessary management actions for such species; 3) multiple-use class of lands released from wilderness consideration and changes necessary to ensure that the California Desert Conservation Area Plan conforms to the California Desert Protection Act of 1994; 4) adoption of an appropriate long-term strategy for motorized competitive speed events outside of off-highway-vehicle (OHV) open areas in the planning area; 5) designation of routes of travel within the planning area; 6) elimination of permitted solid waste landfills from public lands in the planning area; and 7) identification of area rivers eligible for inclusion in the National Wild and Scenic Rivers System. More specifically, the plan would address, inter alia, desert tortoise and Amargosa vole conservation and recovery, T&E plants in the Lower Carson Sough, bat conservation in the Silurian Hills, released wilderness study areas, potential deletion of the Greenwater Canyon Area of Critical Environmental Concern, organized competitive OHV events, general motor vehicle assess, landfill disposal, and wild and scenic river eligibility. Various alternatives are considered for each management category, including a No Action Alternative in each case. A preferred alternative is identified in each case. POSITIVE IMPACTS: The preferred alternatives would ensure that the pace of development would not accelerate on public lands in sensitive areas in the NEMO. Where acceleration of development already constitutes a threat, the plan would provide for proactive measures to assure adequate protection of sensitive public lands and resources, including habitat for T&E species and Wild and Scenic River corridors. To the extent feasible, the plan would provide a public access network to the remaining public lands in the East Mojave where such access would not jeopardize T&E conservation and recovery. NEGATIVE IMPACTS: Certain conservation measures would limit public access, including access for commercial exploitation of resources such as minerals and livestock forage within the management area. LEGAL MANDATES: California Desert Protection Act of 1994 (P.L. 103-433) and Federal Land Policy and Management Act of 1976 (43 U.S.C. 1701 et seq.). PRIOR REFERENCES: For the abstract of the draft EIS, see 01-0269D, Volume 25, Number 3. JF - EPA number: 020352, Final EIS--621 pages and maps, Appendices--587 pages, August 16, 2002 PY - 2002 KW - Parks, Refuges and Forests KW - Agency number: FES 02-23 KW - Archaeological Sites KW - Biologic Assessments KW - Conservation KW - Desert Land KW - Endangered Species (Animals) KW - Endangered Species (Plants) KW - Grazing KW - Historic Sites KW - Impact Monitoring Plans KW - Landfills KW - Land Management KW - Livestock KW - Motor Vehicles KW - Public Health KW - Recreation Resources KW - Recreation Resources Management KW - Transportation KW - Wild and Scenic Rivers KW - Wilderness KW - Wilderness Management KW - Wildlife Surveys KW - California KW - California Desert Conservation Area KW - Mojave Desert KW - California Desert Protection Act of 1994, Compliance KW - Federal Land Policy and Management Act of 1976, Compliance UR - http://libproxy.lib.unc.edu/login?url=http://search.proquest.com/docview/36411878?accountid=14244 L2 - http://vb3lk7eb4t.search.serialssolutions.com/?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&rfr_id=info:sid/Environmental+Impact+Statements%3A+Digests&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=report&rft.jtitle=&rft.atitle=&rft.au=Scudder%2C+B+C%3BStewart%2C+J+S&rft.aulast=Scudder&rft.aufirst=B&rft.date=2001-01-01&rft.volume=&rft.issue=&rft.spage=64&rft.isbn=&rft.btitle=Benthic+Algae+of+Benchmark+Streams+in+Agricultural+Aeas+of+Eastern+Wisconsin&rft.title=Benthic+Algae+of+Benchmark+Streams+in+Agricultural+Aeas+of+Eastern+Wisconsin&rft.issn=&rft_id=info:doi/ LA - English DB - ProQuest Environmental Science Collection N1 - Name - Department of the Interior, Bureau of Land Management, Riverside, California; DOI N1 - Date revised - 2006-05-01 N1 - SuppNotes - Final. Preparation date: August 16, 2002 N1 - Last updated - 2011-12-16 ER - TY - RPRT T1 - WALLULA POWER PROJECT AND WALLULA-MCNARY TRANSMISSION LINE PROJECT, WALLA WALLA COUNTY, WASHINGTON. AN - 36419481; 9453 AB - PURPOSE: The construction and operation of a 1,300-megawatt (MW) natural gas-fired, combined-cycle combustion gas turbine generator in the northwestern portion of Walla Walla County, Washington are proposed. The Western Systems Coordinating Council forecasts a 2.1 percent per year increase in peak power demand between 1999 and 2009 for the Northwest Power Pool, which includes Washington, Oregon, Idaho, and Utah as well as the Canadian provinces of British Columbia and Alberta and portions of Montana, Wyoming, Nevada, and California. The Northwest Power Planning Council predicts a 24 percent probability of one or more "generating insufficiency events" in the Northwest by 2003. These projections suggest a shortfall future energy supply of between 3,000 and 6,000 MW. The 175.48-acre Wallula Power Project site lies eight miles south of the city of Pasco, two miles north of the unincorporated community of Wallula, and seven miles southeast of the unincorporated community of Burbank. The plant itself would require 97 acres within the site. The power plant would consist of two independent 650-MW power blocks with backup systems to maintain overall plant reliability and availability. Natural gas would be burned to fuel a gas turbine engine that would drive a generator to produce electrical energy. Hot exhaust gas produced by the combustion turbine would be used to boil water in a heat recovery steam generator (HRSG). Steam produced by the HRSG would turn another turbine generator to produce additional electrical energy. Exhaust steam exiting each turbine would be directed into a water-cooled condenser, where it would be cooled until it condensed back into water. The condensate would drain into a collection tank, then pumped from the tank back to the two HRSGs, where it would again be used to generate steam. Natural gas would be supplied to the project site via a 5.9-mile pipeline interconnection constructed and operated by PG&E Gas Transmission-Northwest. Makeup water would be supplied via a 4.6-mile pipeline extending from the existing 10 Boise Cascade Corporation fiber farm water wells. Firm transmission of power generated by the project would require construction of a new 500-kilovolt transmission line and a switchyard near Smiths Harbor and upgrading of the existing McNary Substation. Approximately 5.1 miles of new transmission line would extend from the proposed generation plant to the new switchyard, and approximately 28 miles of new transmission line would be provided adjacent to an existing line from the Smiths Harbor Switchyard to the McNary Substation. In addition to the proposed action and a No Action Alternative, transmission line design and alignment options are also considered in this final EIS. POSITIVE IMPACTS: The generator would provide low-cost energy to meet the growing needs of the Pacific Northwest and other interconnected electric transmission areas where electric energy is in demand. NEGATIVE IMPACTS: Project facilities would lie in an area characterized by seismic activity. Generation of power would result in the release of particulate matter in nonattainment area for this pollutant. To offset the production of 303 tons of particulates per year, the operator of the plant would acquire 1,300 acres of active farmland and entire if from agricultural use. Groundwater pumping could exacerbate drawdown at the Iowa Beef Processors well. Approximately 1,700 acres of cottonwood plantation and irrigation cropland would be purchased or leased as part of water rights acquisitions for the plant, resulting in the conversion of this land to dryland grasses /shrubs, fallow land, or grazing land for the life of the project. Halting of irrigation on the project site could have indirect impacts on wetlands. Transmission towers could discourage recreational users of the Wallula Habitat Management Unit and Wanaket Wildlife Area. Hazardous materials, including ammonia, would be used at the site. LEGAL MANDATES: Bonneville Project Act of 1937 (16 U.S.C. 832(a) et seq.). PRIOR REFERENCES: For the abstract of the draft EIS, see 02-0131D, Volume 26, Number 2. JF - EPA number: 020341, 461 pages and maps, August 7, 2002 PY - 2002 KW - Energy KW - Agency number: DOE/EIS-0330 KW - Air Quality Standards Violations KW - Biologic Assessments KW - Earthquakes KW - Electric Generators KW - Electric Power KW - Farmlands KW - Grazing KW - Hazardous Materials KW - Health Hazard Analyses KW - Land Acquisitions KW - Leasing KW - Natural Gas KW - Particulates KW - Power Plants KW - Recreation Resources KW - Seismic Surveys KW - Transmission Lines KW - Visual Resources KW - Wells KW - Wetlands KW - Washington KW - Bonneville Project Act of 1937, Project Authorization UR - http://libproxy.lib.unc.edu/login?url=http://search.proquest.com/docview/36419481?accountid=14244 L2 - http://vb3lk7eb4t.search.serialssolutions.com/?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&rfr_id=info:sid/Environmental+Impact+Statements%3A+Digests&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=report&rft.jtitle=&rft.atitle=&rft.au=&rft.aulast=&rft.aufirst=&rft.date=2001-01-01&rft.volume=&rft.issue=&rft.spage=&rft.isbn=&rft.btitle=Water+Resources+Data%2C+Florida+Water+Year+2000.+Volume+4%3A+Northwest+Florida&rft.title=Water+Resources+Data%2C+Florida+Water+Year+2000.+Volume+4%3A+Northwest+Florida&rft.issn=&rft_id=info:doi/ LA - English DB - ProQuest Environmental Science Collection N1 - Name - Department of Energy, Bonneville Power Administration, Portland, Oregon; DOE N1 - Date revised - 2006-05-01 N1 - SuppNotes - Final. Preparation date: August 7, 2002 N1 - Last updated - 2011-12-16 ER - TY - JOUR T1 - Economic prefeasibility studies of mining in the Stikine area, Southeast Alaska AN - 52007669; 2003-025692 JF - BLM - Alaska Technical Report AU - Coldwell, James R Y1 - 2002/08// PY - 2002 DA - August 2002 SP - 33 EP - 33, 2 sheets PB - U. S. Department of the Interior, Bureau of Land Management, Alaska State Office, Anchorage, AK KW - Type: site location map KW - Type: economic geology map KW - United States KW - mining KW - molybdenum ores KW - Southeastern Alaska KW - optimization KW - site location maps KW - mineral economics KW - production KW - feasibility studies KW - massive sulfide deposits KW - Stikine Alaska KW - maps KW - land management KW - metal ores KW - polymetallic ores KW - gold ores KW - copper ores KW - tonnage KW - massive deposits KW - economic geology maps KW - Alaska KW - 27B:Economic geology, economics of ore deposits UR - http://libproxy.lib.unc.edu/login?url=http://search.proquest.com/docview/52007669?accountid=14244 L2 - http://vb3lk7eb4t.search.serialssolutions.com/?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&rfr_id=info:sid/GeoRef&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=book&rft.jtitle=&rft.atitle=&rft.au=Coldwell%2C+James+R&rft.aulast=Coldwell&rft.aufirst=James&rft.date=2002-08-01&rft.volume=&rft.issue=&rft.spage=&rft.isbn=&rft.btitle=Economic+prefeasibility+studies+of+mining+in+the+Stikine+area%2C+Southeast+Alaska&rft.title=Economic+prefeasibility+studies+of+mining+in+the+Stikine+area%2C+Southeast+Alaska&rft.issn=&rft_id=info:doi/ L2 - http://www.blm.gov/ak/st/en/info/gen_pubs/tr.html LA - English DB - GeoRef N1 - Copyright - GeoRef, Copyright 2012, American Geosciences Institute. N1 - Date revised - 2003-01-01 N1 - Number of references - 61 N1 - PubXState - AK N1 - Document feature - illus. incl. 4 tables N1 - SuppNotes - Includes appendices N1 - Last updated - 2012-06-07 N1 - CODEN - #04969 N1 - SubjectsTermNotLitGenreText - Alaska; copper ores; economic geology maps; feasibility studies; gold ores; land management; maps; massive deposits; massive sulfide deposits; metal ores; mineral economics; mining; molybdenum ores; optimization; polymetallic ores; production; site location maps; Southeastern Alaska; Stikine Alaska; tonnage; United States ER - TY - JOUR T1 - Monitoring and Assessing Our Nation's Water Quality AN - 14656216; 10642997 AB - Through the integration of its six major water quality programs, USGS continues to provide relevant water resources data. The agency monitoring and research programs address all components of the hydrologic cycle, recognize the interconnections between water quality and biological systems, and evaluate water quality in an overall hydrologic context. The contributions of long-term monitoring, assessment, and research to effective water management are discussed. Elements of the six USGS water quality monitoring initiatives are summarized, and a case study of nutrient transport in the Mississippi River basin is included. JF - USGS Fact Sheet 076-02 AU - Mallard, Gail E AU - Hamilton, Pixie A Y1 - 2002/08// PY - 2002 DA - Aug 2002 PB - USGS, The Boulevard Kidlington Oxford OX5 1GB KW - Environment Abstracts KW - NUTRIENTS KW - MONITORING, WATER KW - MISSISSIPPI RIVER BASIN KW - WATER POLLUTION INDICATORS KW - WATER POLLUTION RESEARCH KW - US GEOLOGICAL SURVEY KW - ENA 07:General UR - http://libproxy.lib.unc.edu/login?url=http://search.proquest.com/docview/14656216?accountid=14244 L2 - http://vb3lk7eb4t.search.serialssolutions.com/?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&rfr_id=info:sid/ProQ%3Aenvabstractsmodule&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=report&rft.jtitle=&rft.atitle=&rft.au=&rft.aulast=&rft.aufirst=&rft.date=2001-01-01&rft.volume=&rft.issue=&rft.spage=&rft.isbn=&rft.btitle=Alternative+Regionalization+Scheme+for+Defining+Nutrient+Criteria+for+Rivers+and+Streams&rft.title=Alternative+Regionalization+Scheme+for+Defining+Nutrient+Criteria+for+Rivers+and+Streams&rft.issn=&rft_id=info:doi/ L2 - http://www.csa.com/htbin/envabs.cgi?pdf=03-09954.pdf LA - English DB - ProQuest Environmental Science Collection N1 - Date revised - 2009-08-01 N1 - Document feature - |n 1 |t graphs N1 - Last updated - 2011-12-15 N1 - SubjectsTermNotLitGenreText - NUTRIENTS; MONITORING, WATER; MISSISSIPPI RIVER BASIN; WATER POLLUTION RESEARCH; US GEOLOGICAL SURVEY; WATER POLLUTION INDICATORS ER - TY - RPRT T1 - OIL AND GAS MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR LAKE MEREDITH NATIONAL RECREATION AREA AND ALIBATES FLINT QUARRIES NATIONAL MONUMENT, HUTCHINSON MOORE, AND POTTER COUNTIES, TEXAS. [Part 1 of 3] T2 - OIL AND GAS MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR LAKE MEREDITH NATIONAL RECREATION AREA AND ALIBATES FLINT QUARRIES NATIONAL MONUMENT, HUTCHINSON MOORE, AND POTTER COUNTIES, TEXAS. AN - 36387818; 9442-020329_0001 AB - PURPOSE: The implementation of a management plan for existing and anticipated oil and gas operations associated with the exercise of nonfederal oil and gas interests underlying the 44,977.6-acre Lake Meredith National Recreation Area and the 1,371-acre Alibates Flint Quarries National Monument in Hutchinson, Moore, and Potter counties, Texas is proposed. Existing transpark oil and gas pipelines and activities and their associated rights-of-way are also addressed. Lake Meredith was created by construction of the Sanford Dam on the Canadian River in the early 1960s to provide water for municipal and industrial use to 11 surrounding municipalities and water-based recreational opportunities. Alibates Flint Quarries National Monument was established to preserve a concentration of unique flint quarries used as a source of raw materials for weapons and tools by High Plains prehistoric cultures over a period of 12,000 years. Currently 170 active nonfederal oil and gas operations are located within the two national parks. When the parks were created, the federal government acquired surface ownership within the two areas, but private entities and the state of Texas retained subsurface mineral interests. Hence, the federal government does not own any of the subsurface oil and gas rights in the parks. Existing and future oil operations in the parks have the potential to threaten park resources and values to the extent that the enjoyment of future generations could be impaired. The analysis area for the management plan extends 0.25 mile outside park boundaries. Key issues identified during scoping include those related to socioeconomics, air quality, geologic resources, paleontological resources, floodplains and water resources, vegetation, wetlands, fish and wildlife, threatened and endangered species, cultural resources, and visitor use and experience. Three alternatives, including a No Action Alternative (Alternative A), are considered in this final EIS. The preferred alternative (Alternative B) would designate all areas of the park as special management areas (SMAs), and specific operating stipulations would be applied. New nonfederal oil and gas operations, including the construction of access roads, wellpads, compressors, flowlines, and gathering lines could be permitted in four SMAs on a total of 12,328 acres. No surface occupancy would be permitted on 30,586 acres within six SMAs; most, if not all, of the drilling targets underlying these SMAs could be accessed using proven directional drilling technologies. POSITIVE IMPACTS: The preferred alternative would avoid, minimize, or mitigate conflicts between oil and gas operations and visitor use, provide holders of oil and gas rights reasonable access for exploration and development, and avoid water quality degradation, degradation of cultural resources, damage to Sanford Dam, scientifically significant paleontological resources, and threats to human health and safety. Pertinent guidance would be provided to operators to facilitate planning and compliance with federal regulations. NEGATIVE IMPACTS: New drilling and production operations on up to 150 acres and existing and abandoned but unreclaimed operations on 674 acres would result in 824 acres of surface disturbance associated with nonfederal oil and gas development. Development stipulations would result in minor to moderate increases in project costs, including reclamation costs. Normal operations would have moderate impacts on air quality, wetlands, geologic resources, floodplains and water quality, fish and wildlife habitat, cultural resources, and recreational visitor experiences. Accidental releases could have major impacts on nearly all resource categories. LEGAL MANDATES: National Historic Preservation Act of 1966, as amended (16 U.S.C. 470 et seq.), National Park Service Organic Act of 1916 (16 U.S.C. 1 et seq.), National Park System General Authorities Act (16 U.S.C. 1a-1), Public Law 89-154, and Public Law 101-628. PRIOR REFERENCES: For the abstract of the draft EIS, see 01-0253D, Volume 25, Number 3. JF - EPA number: 020329, 522 pages and maps, July 29, 2002 PY - 2002 VL - 1 KW - Energy KW - Agency number: FES 02-22 KW - Air Quality KW - Cultural Resources KW - Dams KW - Endangered Species (Animals) KW - Endangered Species (Plants) KW - Geologic Sites KW - Floodplains KW - Impact Assessment Methodology KW - Lakes KW - Land Management KW - National Parks KW - Natural Gas KW - Oil Production KW - Oil Spills KW - Paleontological Sites KW - Quarries KW - Recreation Resources KW - Reservoirs KW - Safety KW - Vegetation KW - Wetlands KW - Wildlife Surveys KW - Alibates Flint Quarries National Monument KW - Canadian River KW - Lake Meredith National Recreation Area KW - Texas KW - National Historic Preservation Act of 1966, Archaeological Sites KW - National Park Service Organic Act of 1916, Compliance KW - National Park System General Authorities Act, Compliance KW - Public Law 89-154, Compliance KW - Public Law 101-628, Compliance UR - http://libproxy.lib.unc.edu/login?url=http://search.proquest.com/docview/36387818?accountid=14244 L2 - http://vb3lk7eb4t.search.serialssolutions.com/?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&rfr_id=info:sid/Environmental+Impact+Statements%3A+Full+Text&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=report&rft.jtitle=&rft.atitle=&rft.au=&rft.aulast=&rft.aufirst=&rft.date=2002-07-29&rft.volume=&rft.issue=&rft.spage=&rft.isbn=&rft.btitle=OIL+AND+GAS+MANAGEMENT+PLAN+FOR+LAKE+MEREDITH+NATIONAL+RECREATION+AREA+AND+ALIBATES+FLINT+QUARRIES+NATIONAL+MONUMENT%2C+HUTCHINSON+MOORE%2C+AND+POTTER+COUNTIES%2C+TEXAS.&rft.title=OIL+AND+GAS+MANAGEMENT+PLAN+FOR+LAKE+MEREDITH+NATIONAL+RECREATION+AREA+AND+ALIBATES+FLINT+QUARRIES+NATIONAL+MONUMENT%2C+HUTCHINSON+MOORE%2C+AND+POTTER+COUNTIES%2C+TEXAS.&rft.issn=&rft_id=info:doi/ LA - English DB - ProQuest Environmental Science Collection N1 - Name - Department of the Interior, National Park Service, Fritch, Texas; DOI N1 - Date revised - 2006-05-01 N1 - SuppNotes - Final. Preparation date: July 29, 2002 N1 - Last updated - 2011-12-16 ER - TY - RPRT T1 - OIL AND GAS MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR LAKE MEREDITH NATIONAL RECREATION AREA AND ALIBATES FLINT QUARRIES NATIONAL MONUMENT, HUTCHINSON MOORE, AND POTTER COUNTIES, TEXAS. [Part 2 of 3] T2 - OIL AND GAS MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR LAKE MEREDITH NATIONAL RECREATION AREA AND ALIBATES FLINT QUARRIES NATIONAL MONUMENT, HUTCHINSON MOORE, AND POTTER COUNTIES, TEXAS. AN - 36379444; 9442-020329_0002 AB - PURPOSE: The implementation of a management plan for existing and anticipated oil and gas operations associated with the exercise of nonfederal oil and gas interests underlying the 44,977.6-acre Lake Meredith National Recreation Area and the 1,371-acre Alibates Flint Quarries National Monument in Hutchinson, Moore, and Potter counties, Texas is proposed. Existing transpark oil and gas pipelines and activities and their associated rights-of-way are also addressed. Lake Meredith was created by construction of the Sanford Dam on the Canadian River in the early 1960s to provide water for municipal and industrial use to 11 surrounding municipalities and water-based recreational opportunities. Alibates Flint Quarries National Monument was established to preserve a concentration of unique flint quarries used as a source of raw materials for weapons and tools by High Plains prehistoric cultures over a period of 12,000 years. Currently 170 active nonfederal oil and gas operations are located within the two national parks. When the parks were created, the federal government acquired surface ownership within the two areas, but private entities and the state of Texas retained subsurface mineral interests. Hence, the federal government does not own any of the subsurface oil and gas rights in the parks. Existing and future oil operations in the parks have the potential to threaten park resources and values to the extent that the enjoyment of future generations could be impaired. The analysis area for the management plan extends 0.25 mile outside park boundaries. Key issues identified during scoping include those related to socioeconomics, air quality, geologic resources, paleontological resources, floodplains and water resources, vegetation, wetlands, fish and wildlife, threatened and endangered species, cultural resources, and visitor use and experience. Three alternatives, including a No Action Alternative (Alternative A), are considered in this final EIS. The preferred alternative (Alternative B) would designate all areas of the park as special management areas (SMAs), and specific operating stipulations would be applied. New nonfederal oil and gas operations, including the construction of access roads, wellpads, compressors, flowlines, and gathering lines could be permitted in four SMAs on a total of 12,328 acres. No surface occupancy would be permitted on 30,586 acres within six SMAs; most, if not all, of the drilling targets underlying these SMAs could be accessed using proven directional drilling technologies. POSITIVE IMPACTS: The preferred alternative would avoid, minimize, or mitigate conflicts between oil and gas operations and visitor use, provide holders of oil and gas rights reasonable access for exploration and development, and avoid water quality degradation, degradation of cultural resources, damage to Sanford Dam, scientifically significant paleontological resources, and threats to human health and safety. Pertinent guidance would be provided to operators to facilitate planning and compliance with federal regulations. NEGATIVE IMPACTS: New drilling and production operations on up to 150 acres and existing and abandoned but unreclaimed operations on 674 acres would result in 824 acres of surface disturbance associated with nonfederal oil and gas development. Development stipulations would result in minor to moderate increases in project costs, including reclamation costs. Normal operations would have moderate impacts on air quality, wetlands, geologic resources, floodplains and water quality, fish and wildlife habitat, cultural resources, and recreational visitor experiences. Accidental releases could have major impacts on nearly all resource categories. LEGAL MANDATES: National Historic Preservation Act of 1966, as amended (16 U.S.C. 470 et seq.), National Park Service Organic Act of 1916 (16 U.S.C. 1 et seq.), National Park System General Authorities Act (16 U.S.C. 1a-1), Public Law 89-154, and Public Law 101-628. PRIOR REFERENCES: For the abstract of the draft EIS, see 01-0253D, Volume 25, Number 3. JF - EPA number: 020329, 522 pages and maps, July 29, 2002 PY - 2002 VL - 2 KW - Energy KW - Agency number: FES 02-22 KW - Air Quality KW - Cultural Resources KW - Dams KW - Endangered Species (Animals) KW - Endangered Species (Plants) KW - Geologic Sites KW - Floodplains KW - Impact Assessment Methodology KW - Lakes KW - Land Management KW - National Parks KW - Natural Gas KW - Oil Production KW - Oil Spills KW - Paleontological Sites KW - Quarries KW - Recreation Resources KW - Reservoirs KW - Safety KW - Vegetation KW - Wetlands KW - Wildlife Surveys KW - Alibates Flint Quarries National Monument KW - Canadian River KW - Lake Meredith National Recreation Area KW - Texas KW - National Historic Preservation Act of 1966, Archaeological Sites KW - National Park Service Organic Act of 1916, Compliance KW - National Park System General Authorities Act, Compliance KW - Public Law 89-154, Compliance KW - Public Law 101-628, Compliance UR - http://libproxy.lib.unc.edu/login?url=http://search.proquest.com/docview/36379444?accountid=14244 L2 - http://vb3lk7eb4t.search.serialssolutions.com/?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&rfr_id=info:sid/Environmental+Impact+Statements%3A+Full+Text&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=report&rft.jtitle=&rft.atitle=&rft.au=&rft.aulast=&rft.aufirst=&rft.date=2002-07-29&rft.volume=&rft.issue=&rft.spage=&rft.isbn=&rft.btitle=OIL+AND+GAS+MANAGEMENT+PLAN+FOR+LAKE+MEREDITH+NATIONAL+RECREATION+AREA+AND+ALIBATES+FLINT+QUARRIES+NATIONAL+MONUMENT%2C+HUTCHINSON+MOORE%2C+AND+POTTER+COUNTIES%2C+TEXAS.&rft.title=OIL+AND+GAS+MANAGEMENT+PLAN+FOR+LAKE+MEREDITH+NATIONAL+RECREATION+AREA+AND+ALIBATES+FLINT+QUARRIES+NATIONAL+MONUMENT%2C+HUTCHINSON+MOORE%2C+AND+POTTER+COUNTIES%2C+TEXAS.&rft.issn=&rft_id=info:doi/ LA - English DB - ProQuest Environmental Science Collection N1 - Name - Department of the Interior, National Park Service, Fritch, Texas; DOI N1 - Date revised - 2006-05-01 N1 - SuppNotes - Final. Preparation date: July 29, 2002 N1 - Last updated - 2011-12-16 ER - TY - RPRT T1 - OIL AND GAS MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR LAKE MEREDITH NATIONAL RECREATION AREA AND ALIBATES FLINT QUARRIES NATIONAL MONUMENT, HUTCHINSON MOORE, AND POTTER COUNTIES, TEXAS. [Part 3 of 3] T2 - OIL AND GAS MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR LAKE MEREDITH NATIONAL RECREATION AREA AND ALIBATES FLINT QUARRIES NATIONAL MONUMENT, HUTCHINSON MOORE, AND POTTER COUNTIES, TEXAS. AN - 36378624; 9442-020329_0003 AB - PURPOSE: The implementation of a management plan for existing and anticipated oil and gas operations associated with the exercise of nonfederal oil and gas interests underlying the 44,977.6-acre Lake Meredith National Recreation Area and the 1,371-acre Alibates Flint Quarries National Monument in Hutchinson, Moore, and Potter counties, Texas is proposed. Existing transpark oil and gas pipelines and activities and their associated rights-of-way are also addressed. Lake Meredith was created by construction of the Sanford Dam on the Canadian River in the early 1960s to provide water for municipal and industrial use to 11 surrounding municipalities and water-based recreational opportunities. Alibates Flint Quarries National Monument was established to preserve a concentration of unique flint quarries used as a source of raw materials for weapons and tools by High Plains prehistoric cultures over a period of 12,000 years. Currently 170 active nonfederal oil and gas operations are located within the two national parks. When the parks were created, the federal government acquired surface ownership within the two areas, but private entities and the state of Texas retained subsurface mineral interests. Hence, the federal government does not own any of the subsurface oil and gas rights in the parks. Existing and future oil operations in the parks have the potential to threaten park resources and values to the extent that the enjoyment of future generations could be impaired. The analysis area for the management plan extends 0.25 mile outside park boundaries. Key issues identified during scoping include those related to socioeconomics, air quality, geologic resources, paleontological resources, floodplains and water resources, vegetation, wetlands, fish and wildlife, threatened and endangered species, cultural resources, and visitor use and experience. Three alternatives, including a No Action Alternative (Alternative A), are considered in this final EIS. The preferred alternative (Alternative B) would designate all areas of the park as special management areas (SMAs), and specific operating stipulations would be applied. New nonfederal oil and gas operations, including the construction of access roads, wellpads, compressors, flowlines, and gathering lines could be permitted in four SMAs on a total of 12,328 acres. No surface occupancy would be permitted on 30,586 acres within six SMAs; most, if not all, of the drilling targets underlying these SMAs could be accessed using proven directional drilling technologies. POSITIVE IMPACTS: The preferred alternative would avoid, minimize, or mitigate conflicts between oil and gas operations and visitor use, provide holders of oil and gas rights reasonable access for exploration and development, and avoid water quality degradation, degradation of cultural resources, damage to Sanford Dam, scientifically significant paleontological resources, and threats to human health and safety. Pertinent guidance would be provided to operators to facilitate planning and compliance with federal regulations. NEGATIVE IMPACTS: New drilling and production operations on up to 150 acres and existing and abandoned but unreclaimed operations on 674 acres would result in 824 acres of surface disturbance associated with nonfederal oil and gas development. Development stipulations would result in minor to moderate increases in project costs, including reclamation costs. Normal operations would have moderate impacts on air quality, wetlands, geologic resources, floodplains and water quality, fish and wildlife habitat, cultural resources, and recreational visitor experiences. Accidental releases could have major impacts on nearly all resource categories. LEGAL MANDATES: National Historic Preservation Act of 1966, as amended (16 U.S.C. 470 et seq.), National Park Service Organic Act of 1916 (16 U.S.C. 1 et seq.), National Park System General Authorities Act (16 U.S.C. 1a-1), Public Law 89-154, and Public Law 101-628. PRIOR REFERENCES: For the abstract of the draft EIS, see 01-0253D, Volume 25, Number 3. JF - EPA number: 020329, 522 pages and maps, July 29, 2002 PY - 2002 VL - 3 KW - Energy KW - Agency number: FES 02-22 KW - Air Quality KW - Cultural Resources KW - Dams KW - Endangered Species (Animals) KW - Endangered Species (Plants) KW - Geologic Sites KW - Floodplains KW - Impact Assessment Methodology KW - Lakes KW - Land Management KW - National Parks KW - Natural Gas KW - Oil Production KW - Oil Spills KW - Paleontological Sites KW - Quarries KW - Recreation Resources KW - Reservoirs KW - Safety KW - Vegetation KW - Wetlands KW - Wildlife Surveys KW - Alibates Flint Quarries National Monument KW - Canadian River KW - Lake Meredith National Recreation Area KW - Texas KW - National Historic Preservation Act of 1966, Archaeological Sites KW - National Park Service Organic Act of 1916, Compliance KW - National Park System General Authorities Act, Compliance KW - Public Law 89-154, Compliance KW - Public Law 101-628, Compliance UR - http://libproxy.lib.unc.edu/login?url=http://search.proquest.com/docview/36378624?accountid=14244 L2 - http://vb3lk7eb4t.search.serialssolutions.com/?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&rfr_id=info:sid/Environmental+Impact+Statements%3A+Full+Text&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=report&rft.jtitle=&rft.atitle=&rft.au=&rft.aulast=&rft.aufirst=&rft.date=2002-07-29&rft.volume=&rft.issue=&rft.spage=&rft.isbn=&rft.btitle=OIL+AND+GAS+MANAGEMENT+PLAN+FOR+LAKE+MEREDITH+NATIONAL+RECREATION+AREA+AND+ALIBATES+FLINT+QUARRIES+NATIONAL+MONUMENT%2C+HUTCHINSON+MOORE%2C+AND+POTTER+COUNTIES%2C+TEXAS.&rft.title=OIL+AND+GAS+MANAGEMENT+PLAN+FOR+LAKE+MEREDITH+NATIONAL+RECREATION+AREA+AND+ALIBATES+FLINT+QUARRIES+NATIONAL+MONUMENT%2C+HUTCHINSON+MOORE%2C+AND+POTTER+COUNTIES%2C+TEXAS.&rft.issn=&rft_id=info:doi/ LA - English DB - ProQuest Environmental Science Collection N1 - Name - Department of the Interior, National Park Service, Fritch, Texas; DOI N1 - Date revised - 2006-05-01 N1 - SuppNotes - Final. Preparation date: July 29, 2002 N1 - Last updated - 2011-12-16 ER - TY - RPRT T1 - OIL AND GAS MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR LAKE MEREDITH NATIONAL RECREATION AREA AND ALIBATES FLINT QUARRIES NATIONAL MONUMENT, HUTCHINSON MOORE, AND POTTER COUNTIES, TEXAS. AN - 16359744; 9442 AB - PURPOSE: The implementation of a management plan for existing and anticipated oil and gas operations associated with the exercise of nonfederal oil and gas interests underlying the 44,977.6-acre Lake Meredith National Recreation Area and the 1,371-acre Alibates Flint Quarries National Monument in Hutchinson, Moore, and Potter counties, Texas is proposed. Existing transpark oil and gas pipelines and activities and their associated rights-of-way are also addressed. Lake Meredith was created by construction of the Sanford Dam on the Canadian River in the early 1960s to provide water for municipal and industrial use to 11 surrounding municipalities and water-based recreational opportunities. Alibates Flint Quarries National Monument was established to preserve a concentration of unique flint quarries used as a source of raw materials for weapons and tools by High Plains prehistoric cultures over a period of 12,000 years. Currently 170 active nonfederal oil and gas operations are located within the two national parks. When the parks were created, the federal government acquired surface ownership within the two areas, but private entities and the state of Texas retained subsurface mineral interests. Hence, the federal government does not own any of the subsurface oil and gas rights in the parks. Existing and future oil operations in the parks have the potential to threaten park resources and values to the extent that the enjoyment of future generations could be impaired. The analysis area for the management plan extends 0.25 mile outside park boundaries. Key issues identified during scoping include those related to socioeconomics, air quality, geologic resources, paleontological resources, floodplains and water resources, vegetation, wetlands, fish and wildlife, threatened and endangered species, cultural resources, and visitor use and experience. Three alternatives, including a No Action Alternative (Alternative A), are considered in this final EIS. The preferred alternative (Alternative B) would designate all areas of the park as special management areas (SMAs), and specific operating stipulations would be applied. New nonfederal oil and gas operations, including the construction of access roads, wellpads, compressors, flowlines, and gathering lines could be permitted in four SMAs on a total of 12,328 acres. No surface occupancy would be permitted on 30,586 acres within six SMAs; most, if not all, of the drilling targets underlying these SMAs could be accessed using proven directional drilling technologies. POSITIVE IMPACTS: The preferred alternative would avoid, minimize, or mitigate conflicts between oil and gas operations and visitor use, provide holders of oil and gas rights reasonable access for exploration and development, and avoid water quality degradation, degradation of cultural resources, damage to Sanford Dam, scientifically significant paleontological resources, and threats to human health and safety. Pertinent guidance would be provided to operators to facilitate planning and compliance with federal regulations. NEGATIVE IMPACTS: New drilling and production operations on up to 150 acres and existing and abandoned but unreclaimed operations on 674 acres would result in 824 acres of surface disturbance associated with nonfederal oil and gas development. Development stipulations would result in minor to moderate increases in project costs, including reclamation costs. Normal operations would have moderate impacts on air quality, wetlands, geologic resources, floodplains and water quality, fish and wildlife habitat, cultural resources, and recreational visitor experiences. Accidental releases could have major impacts on nearly all resource categories. LEGAL MANDATES: National Historic Preservation Act of 1966, as amended (16 U.S.C. 470 et seq.), National Park Service Organic Act of 1916 (16 U.S.C. 1 et seq.), National Park System General Authorities Act (16 U.S.C. 1a-1), Public Law 89-154, and Public Law 101-628. PRIOR REFERENCES: For the abstract of the draft EIS, see 01-0253D, Volume 25, Number 3. JF - EPA number: 020329, 522 pages and maps, July 29, 2002 PY - 2002 KW - Energy KW - Agency number: FES 02-22 KW - Air Quality KW - Cultural Resources KW - Dams KW - Endangered Species (Animals) KW - Endangered Species (Plants) KW - Geologic Sites KW - Floodplains KW - Impact Assessment Methodology KW - Lakes KW - Land Management KW - National Parks KW - Natural Gas KW - Oil Production KW - Oil Spills KW - Paleontological Sites KW - Quarries KW - Recreation Resources KW - Reservoirs KW - Safety KW - Vegetation KW - Wetlands KW - Wildlife Surveys KW - Alibates Flint Quarries National Monument KW - Canadian River KW - Lake Meredith National Recreation Area KW - Texas KW - National Historic Preservation Act of 1966, Archaeological Sites KW - National Park Service Organic Act of 1916, Compliance KW - National Park System General Authorities Act, Compliance KW - Public Law 89-154, Compliance KW - Public Law 101-628, Compliance UR - http://libproxy.lib.unc.edu/login?url=http://search.proquest.com/docview/16359744?accountid=14244 L2 - http://vb3lk7eb4t.search.serialssolutions.com/?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&rfr_id=info:sid/Environmental+Impact+Statements%3A+Digests&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=report&rft.jtitle=&rft.atitle=&rft.au=&rft.aulast=&rft.aufirst=&rft.date=2002-07-29&rft.volume=&rft.issue=&rft.spage=&rft.isbn=&rft.btitle=OIL+AND+GAS+MANAGEMENT+PLAN+FOR+LAKE+MEREDITH+NATIONAL+RECREATION+AREA+AND+ALIBATES+FLINT+QUARRIES+NATIONAL+MONUMENT%2C+HUTCHINSON+MOORE%2C+AND+POTTER+COUNTIES%2C+TEXAS.&rft.title=OIL+AND+GAS+MANAGEMENT+PLAN+FOR+LAKE+MEREDITH+NATIONAL+RECREATION+AREA+AND+ALIBATES+FLINT+QUARRIES+NATIONAL+MONUMENT%2C+HUTCHINSON+MOORE%2C+AND+POTTER+COUNTIES%2C+TEXAS.&rft.issn=&rft_id=info:doi/ LA - English DB - ProQuest Environmental Science Collection N1 - Name - Department of the Interior, National Park Service, Fritch, Texas; DOI N1 - Date revised - 2006-05-01 N1 - SuppNotes - Final. Preparation date: July 29, 2002 N1 - Last updated - 2011-12-16 ER - TY - RPRT T1 - NORTHERN AND EASTERN COLORADO DESERT COORDINATED MANAGEMENT PLAN, RIVERSIDE, IMPERIAL, AND SAN BERNARDINO COUNTIES, CALIFORNIA; AN AMENDMENT TO THE CALIFORNIA DESERT CONSERVATION AREA PLAN 1980 AND SIKES ACT PLAN WITH THE CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND GAME. AN - 36422387; 9431 AB - PURPOSE: The implementation of a land and resource management plan for the Northern and Eastern Colorado Desert of southeastern California Desert is proposed. The planning area encompasses 5.5 million acres in Riverside, Imperial, and San Bernardino counties, and is one of several areas falling under the California Desert Conservation Area Plan. Key issues identified during scoping include: adherence to standards and guidelines; recovery of the desert tortoise, a federal- and state-listed threatened species; conservation of a variety of other species and habitats; public lands access and uses. A wide variety of decisions is proposed, including decisions related to both land use allocations and on-the-ground actions. Management activities would affect the eastern half of Joshua Tree National Park and the Chocolate Mountains Aerial Gunnery Range, which is administered by the U.S. Marine Corps Air Station at Yuma. Four alternatives, including a No Action Alternative and a preferred alternative, are considered in this final EIS. In addition to desert tortoise recovery measures, the plan would specifically address grazing, bighorn sheep, desert mule deer, bats, burrowing owls, other special status species, burros and wild horses, riparian habitat, motor vehicle access, and land ownership patterns. Approximately 1.7 million acres would be managed as areas of critical environmental concern (ACEC). An additional 87 water developments would be provided for wildlife use. A public education program would be instituted. POSITIVE IMPACTS: Standards adopted under the plan would result in improvement of air, water, and soil quality in the desert area. Grazing management stipulations and restriction of access by motor vehicles, including a 36 percent decrease in grazing, would be of particular importance to the improvement of soil quality and animal and plant diversity. ACEC management would significantly improve habitat for special status species within the designated areas. NEGATIVE IMPACTS: Elimination of grazing in some areas could place economic hardship on some livestock operators. Implementation of certain regional standards could increase costs associated with continued use of the grazing leases. Mineral exploration and extraction operations could be subject to some additional restrictions and mitigation requirements that could result in slight to modest increases in the cost of operation and shutdown phases. Restrictions on motor vehicles would reduce recreational access to acres within the management zone. LEGAL MANDATES: Endangered Species Act of 1973 (16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.) and California Desert Protection Act of 1994 (P.L. 103-433). PRIOR REFERENCES: For the abstract of the draft EIS, see 01-0132D, Volume 25, Number 2. JF - EPA number: 020318, Final EIS--597 pages, Appendices--421 pages and maps, July 23, 2002 PY - 2002 KW - Parks, Refuges and Forests KW - Conservation KW - Desert Land KW - Endangered Species (Animals) KW - Grazing KW - Land Management KW - Livestock KW - Motor Vehicles KW - Range Management KW - Transportation Surveys KW - Wetlands KW - Wildlife KW - Wildlife Habitat KW - Wildlife Management KW - Wildlife Surveys KW - California KW - California Desert Conservation Area KW - Chocolate Mountains KW - Colorado Desert KW - Joshua Tree National Park KW - Yuma Marine Corps Air Station KW - California Desert Protection Act of 1994, Compliance KW - Endangered Species Act of 1973, Animals UR - http://libproxy.lib.unc.edu/login?url=http://search.proquest.com/docview/36422387?accountid=14244 L2 - http://vb3lk7eb4t.search.serialssolutions.com/?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&rfr_id=info:sid/Environmental+Impact+Statements%3A+Digests&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=report&rft.jtitle=&rft.atitle=&rft.au=&rft.aulast=&rft.aufirst=&rft.date=2001-01-01&rft.volume=&rft.issue=&rft.spage=&rft.isbn=&rft.btitle=&rft.title=USGS+Professional+Paper+1645&rft.issn=&rft_id=info:doi/ LA - English DB - ProQuest Environmental Science Collection N1 - Name - Department of the Interior, Bureau of Land Management, Riverside, California; DOI N1 - Date revised - 2006-05-01 N1 - SuppNotes - Final. Preparation date: July 23, 2002 N1 - Last updated - 2011-12-16 ER - TY - RPRT T1 - NEWMONT MINING CORPORATION'S LEEVILLE PROJECT, ELKO AND EUREKA COUNTIES, NEVADA. AN - 36398501; 9426 AB - PURPOSE: The development of an underground gold mind, to be known as the Leeville Project, at a site in the Carlin Trend approximately 20 miles northwest of Carlin in Eureka County, Nevada is proposed. The Newmont Mining Company submitted a plan of operations for the mine in April 1997. The mine would involve the sinking of five shafts to a depth of approximately 2,500 feet from the surface to access three main ore bodies. Ancillary mine facilities developed to support underground operations would include shaft hoists, a waste rock disposal facility, a refractory ore stockpile, facilities to support backfill of mined-out stopes, installation and operation of mine dewatering wells, a water treatment plant, and a pipeline /canal system to discharge excess mine water to existing infiltration and irrigation systems in the Boulder Valley. Ore and waste rock would be drilled, blasted, and hoisted to the surface. Most mined-out stopes would be backfilled with cemented rockfill. Development waste rock would be used for stope backfill whenever possible. Ore would be hauled directly to processing facilities at the refractory ore treatment plant located at Newmont's South Operations Area or placed in a refractory ore stockpile approximately 0.5 mile west of the production shaft. Temporary refractory ore stockpiles would be developed in accordance with Newmont's Refractory Ore Stockpile and Waste Rock Dump Design, Construction, and Monitoring Plan. All facilities and surface disturbance would be reclaimed following completion of mining activities. The mine would have a project life of 18 years, during which 18 million tons of ore and waste rock would be generated. In addition to the proposed action and a No Action Alternative, the draft EIS analyzed four alternatives, including: A) elimination of the canal portion of the water discharge facilities; B) backfilling of shafts; and C) relocation of the waste rock disposal facility and refractory ore stockpile. The preferred alternative incorporates portions of the preferred action and all three action alternatives. This abbreviated final EIS provides errata with respect to the draft EIS and public comments and responses and some associated documentation. POSITIVE IMPACTS: The mine would produce a substantial amount of gold, contributing to the nation's reserves of this precious metal. Water removed during dewatering of the mine would be put to beneficial use as irrigation water. The project would continue to provide direct and indirect employment opportunities and result in continue tax base contributions. NEGATIVE IMPACTS: Approximately 486 acres of soil and rangeland vegetation and the associated wildlife habitat and recreational resource would be disturbed by mining activities, including 33 acres of private land and 453 acres of public land. Grazing opportunities would be lost on 264 acres providing 36 animal unit months of forage. Noxious weeds could invade the disturbed area. Habitat for federally protected gashawks, burrowing owls, sage grouse, and ferruginous hawks would be affected by mining. Lahontan cutthroat trout, springsnails, spotted frogs, and California floaters have not been documented any stream segments directly impacted by the project, but some of these species could be located in the overall drawdown area. Potential discharge of acidic water from waste rock disposal facilities could threaten soil and groundwater. Removal of groundwater via dewatering wells would increase the depth of aquifer drawdown already occurring due to mining elsewhere in the area and delay restoration of 70 acres of wetlands and riparian zones potentially impacted by existing dewatering activities in the Carlin Trend. Stream flow and related fish habitat recovery would also be delayed due to dewatering. Though 31 cultural resource sites are located in the area, none are eligible for inclusion in the National Register of Historic Places. LEGAL MANDATES: Federal Land Policy and Management Act of 1976 (43 U.S.C. 1701 et seq.), Federal Water Pollution Control Act of 1972 (33 U.S.C. 1251 et seq.), General Mining Law of 1872, as amended (30 U.S.C. 21 et seq.), and Mining and Minerals Policy Act of 1970 (30 U.S.C. 21a). PRIOR REFERENCES: For the abstract of the draft EIS, see 02-0140D, Volume 26, Number 2. JF - EPA number: 020313, 213 pages, July 18, 2002 PY - 2002 KW - Land Use KW - Agency number: FES-02-20 KW - Acids KW - Birds KW - Canals KW - Cultural Resources KW - Employment KW - Endangered Species (Animals) KW - Farmlands KW - Fish KW - Grazing KW - Irrigation KW - Metals KW - Mining KW - Mines KW - Pipelines KW - Ranges KW - Reclamation KW - Recreation Resources KW - Streams KW - Tailings KW - Vegetation KW - Waste Disposal KW - Water Quality KW - Wetlands KW - Wildlife Habitat KW - Nevada KW - Federal Land Policy and Management Act of 1976, Compliance KW - Federal Water Pollution Control Act of 1972, Section 404 Permits KW - General Mining Law of 1872, Compliance KW - Mining and Minerals Policy Act of 1970, Compliance UR - http://libproxy.lib.unc.edu/login?url=http://search.proquest.com/docview/36398501?accountid=14244 L2 - http://vb3lk7eb4t.search.serialssolutions.com/?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&rfr_id=info:sid/Environmental+Impact+Statements%3A+Digests&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=report&rft.jtitle=&rft.atitle=&rft.au=&rft.aulast=&rft.aufirst=&rft.date=2002-07-18&rft.volume=&rft.issue=&rft.spage=&rft.isbn=&rft.btitle=NEWMONT+MINING+CORPORATION%27S+LEEVILLE+PROJECT%2C+ELKO+AND+EUREKA+COUNTIES%2C+NEVADA.&rft.title=NEWMONT+MINING+CORPORATION%27S+LEEVILLE+PROJECT%2C+ELKO+AND+EUREKA+COUNTIES%2C+NEVADA.&rft.issn=&rft_id=info:doi/ LA - English DB - ProQuest Environmental Science Collection N1 - Name - Department of the Interior, Bureau of Land Management, Elko, Nevada; DOI N1 - Date revised - 2006-05-01 N1 - SuppNotes - Final. Preparation date: July 18, 2002 N1 - Last updated - 2011-12-16 ER - TY - RPRT T1 - DESIGNATION OF CRITICAL HABITAT FOR RIO GRANDE SILVERY MINNOW, BERNALILLO, SANDOVAL, SOCORRO, AND VALENCIA COUNTIES, NEW MEXICO. AN - 36419519; 9413 AB - PURPOSE: The designation of critical habitat for the Rio Grande silvery minnow in Bernalillo, Sandoval, Socorro, and Valencia counties, New Mexico is proposed. The minnow is listed as endangered under the Endangered Species Act of 1972 (ESA). The species was historically one of the most abundant and widespread fishes in the Rio Grande Basin, occurring from Espanola, New Mexico to the Gulf of Mexico. It was also found in the Pecos River from Santa Rosa, New Mexico downstream to the confluence of the Pecos with the Rio Grande in Texas. The minnow now occurs only in the Rio Grande in New Mexico, it's habitat extending from Cochiti Dam downstream to the Elephant Butte Reservoir; this represents only five percent of its former range. Most of the minnows are found in the reach of the Rio Grande extending from the Acacia Diversion Dam to Elephant Butte in Socorro County. Once a species is listed under the ESA, federal agencies must consult with the Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS) and ensure that actions they authorize, fund, or carry out do not jeopardize the species continued existence. Once critical habitat is designated, federal agencies must also consult with the FWS to ensure that actions they authorize, fund, or carry out do not adversely modify designated habitat. Under the proposed action (Alternative B), the FWS proposed to designate as critical minnow habitat the currently occupied reaches of the Rio Grande in New Mexico, referred to as the Middle Rio Grande. In addition to the proposed action and a No Action Alternative (Alternative A), three other action alternatives are considered in this draft EIS: C) designation of the Middle Rio Grande excepting the Cochiti reach, which is the northern reach and a section of the river that has undergone major changes since the Cochiti Dam became operational in 1975; D) designation of the Middle Rio Grand excepting the San Acaacia reach, which is the southern reach and one that experiences significant drying during parts of the year; and E) designation of the Middle Rio Grande as well as two extended reaches within the minnow's historical range, namely the Pecos River from Summer Dam to Brantley Reservoir in New Mexico and the Rio Grande in Big Bend National Preserve and the Rio Grande Wild and Scenic River in Texas. POSITIVE IMPACTS: Critical habitat designation for the minnow would increase the scope of consultations with federal agencies; the scope will be expanded to include impacts of actions on critical habitat as well as some changes to avoid adverse modifications. Efforts to minimize drying events, combined with river restoration activities for the minnow, would enhance riverine and riparian ecosystems. NEGATIVE IMPACTS: It is likely that efforts would be made to increase the flow in the Rio Grande in areas that now experience dry events and that this acquisition of water could impact agricultural communities dependent on Rio Grande water for irrigation purposes. While a voluntary water market is important to maintaining slivery minnow habitat, the secondary impacts on communities could be substantial. Efforts to minimize drying events, combined with river restoration activities for the minnow, could reduce forage for migratory bird species. LEGAL MANDATES: Endangered Species Act of 1973 (16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.). JF - EPA number: 020300, Draft EIS--267 pages, Economic Analysis--116 pages, July 10, 2002 PY - 2002 KW - Parks, Refuges and Forests KW - Birds KW - Conservation KW - Dams KW - Endangered Species (Animals) KW - Economic Assessments KW - Fish KW - Irrigation KW - Rivers KW - Water Conservation KW - Wetlands KW - Wild and Scenic Rivers KW - Wildlife Habitat KW - New Mexico KW - Pecos River KW - Rio Grande KW - Texas KW - Endangered Species Act of 1973, Animals UR - http://libproxy.lib.unc.edu/login?url=http://search.proquest.com/docview/36419519?accountid=14244 L2 - http://vb3lk7eb4t.search.serialssolutions.com/?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&rfr_id=info:sid/Environmental+Impact+Statements%3A+Digests&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=report&rft.jtitle=&rft.atitle=&rft.au=&rft.aulast=&rft.aufirst=&rft.date=2002-07-10&rft.volume=&rft.issue=&rft.spage=&rft.isbn=&rft.btitle=DESIGNATION+OF+CRITICAL+HABITAT+FOR+RIO+GRANDE+SILVERY+MINNOW%2C+BERNALILLO%2C+SANDOVAL%2C+SOCORRO%2C+AND+VALENCIA+COUNTIES%2C+NEW+MEXICO.&rft.title=DESIGNATION+OF+CRITICAL+HABITAT+FOR+RIO+GRANDE+SILVERY+MINNOW%2C+BERNALILLO%2C+SANDOVAL%2C+SOCORRO%2C+AND+VALENCIA+COUNTIES%2C+NEW+MEXICO.&rft.issn=&rft_id=info:doi/ LA - English DB - ProQuest Environmental Science Collection N1 - Name - Department of the Interior, Fish and Wildlife Service, Albuquerque, New Mexico; DOI N1 - Date revised - 2006-05-01 N1 - SuppNotes - Draft. Preparation date: July 10, 2002 N1 - Last updated - 2011-12-16 ER - TY - RPRT T1 - NAVAJO NATIONAL MONUMENT, NAVAJO COUNTY, ARIZONA. AN - 36409016; 9411 AB - PURPOSE: The implementation of a general management plan for the Navajo National Monument in Navajo County, Arizona is proposed. The plan would guide monument management for the next 15 to 20 years. The monument was established to preserve three outstanding 13th Century cliff dwellings in northern Arizona, namely, Betatakin, Keet Seel, and Inscription House. These sites represent the largest, most intact Anasazi structures in the southwestern United States. Three alternatives, including a No Action Alternative (Alternative A), are considered in this draft EIS. The No Action Alternative would continue existing management practices. Alternative B would focus on National Park Service (NPS) land. Under Alternative B, the NPS would focus management on the existing land base to achieve the purposes of the monument. Primary resource protection and visitor understanding would be accomplished on the three federal units at Betatakin, Keet Seel, and Inscription House. Improvements to resource protection would be made with additional NPS ranger patrol staff and ranger stations. Visitor understanding would be improved via provision of a larger visitor center, development of more trails and overlooks, and installation of more outdoor exhibits and provision of interpretive rangers on the mesa top at Betatakin. Alternative C, the preferred alternative, would emphasize partnerships with American Indian tribes and local economic interests. The NPS would manage the existing land base and share common goals with American Indian tribes and others to protect resources and promote visitor understanding of the entire region. The NPS would look beyond the boundary of the monument in efforts to accomplish joint purposes through cooperation and partnerships. Opportunities for more innovative and diverse programs, education and outreach, cross training, and broader resource management would be greatly enhanced by a collaborative regional effort. The plan would emphasize cultural resource stewardship, natural resource protection and preservation, access for traditional Native American cultural purposes, and front country and backcountry experiences as well as the abovementioned partnerships. Other stipulations of the plan would cover conservation easements, facilities development, boundary modifications, and staffing. Estimated capital cost to implement Alternative C amount to $6.1 million. Estimated annual operating costs are estimated at $1.2 million. POSITIVE IMPACTS: The plan would provide a foundation to help park managers guide programs and set priorities for resource stewardship, visitor understanding, partnerships with local interested parties, facilities development, and operations. Local employment rolls would increase. NEGATIVE IMPACTS: Facilities development would disturb some natural vegetation as well as soils. Increased visitation would create increased risk of vandalism to cultural and natural resources. LEGAL MANDATES: Antiquities Act of 1906 (16 U.S.C. 431 et seq.) and Proclamation 873. JF - EPA number: 020298, 185 pages, July 9, 2002 PY - 2002 KW - Parks, Refuges and Forests KW - Agency number: DES 02-26 KW - Archaeological Sites KW - Conservation KW - Cultural Resources KW - Cultural Resources Management KW - Desert Land KW - Easements KW - Employment KW - Historic Sites KW - Indian Reservations KW - Land Management KW - Monuments KW - National Parks KW - Trails KW - Vegetation KW - Arizona KW - Navajo National Monument KW - Antiquities Act of 1906, Compliance KW - Proclamation 873, Project Authorization UR - http://libproxy.lib.unc.edu/login?url=http://search.proquest.com/docview/36409016?accountid=14244 L2 - http://vb3lk7eb4t.search.serialssolutions.com/?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&rfr_id=info:sid/Environmental+Impact+Statements%3A+Digests&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=report&rft.jtitle=&rft.atitle=&rft.au=&rft.aulast=&rft.aufirst=&rft.date=2002-07-09&rft.volume=&rft.issue=&rft.spage=&rft.isbn=&rft.btitle=NAVAJO+NATIONAL+MONUMENT%2C+NAVAJO+COUNTY%2C+ARIZONA.&rft.title=NAVAJO+NATIONAL+MONUMENT%2C+NAVAJO+COUNTY%2C+ARIZONA.&rft.issn=&rft_id=info:doi/ LA - English DB - ProQuest Environmental Science Collection N1 - Name - Department of the Interior, National Park Service, Tonalea, Arizona; DOI N1 - Date revised - 2006-05-01 N1 - SuppNotes - Draft. Preparation date: July 9, 2002 N1 - Last updated - 2011-12-16 ER - TY - JOUR T1 - Mineral investigations in the Koyukuk mining district, Northern Alaska; Volume I, Introductory text and summaries of mines, prospects, and mineral occurrences in the Bettles, Chandalar, Chandler Lake, and Hughes quadrangles; Volume II, Summaries of mines, prospects, and mineral occurrences in the Melozitna, Survey Pass, Tanana, and Wiseman quadrangles AN - 51991245; 2003-035076 JF - BLM - Alaska Technical Report AU - Kurtak, Joseph M AU - Klieforth, Robert F AU - Clark, John M AU - Maclean, Elizabeth A Y1 - 2002/07// PY - 2002 DA - July 2002 EP - variously paginated PB - U. S. Department of the Interior, Bureau of Land Management, Alaska State Office, Anchorage, AK KW - Type: geologic maps KW - United States KW - mineral exploration KW - mineral deposits, genesis KW - resources KW - geologic maps KW - mineral resources KW - spatial distribution KW - sedimentary rocks KW - metallogeny KW - coal KW - Koyukuk mining district KW - gold ores KW - Melozitna Quadrangle KW - epithermal processes KW - mines KW - tin ores KW - host rocks KW - Tanana Quadrangle KW - massive sulfide deposits KW - maps KW - Wiseman Quadrangle KW - Northern Alaska KW - metal ores KW - Survey Pass Quadrangle KW - chromite ores KW - massive deposits KW - Alaska KW - 26A:Economic geology, general, deposits UR - http://libproxy.lib.unc.edu/login?url=http://search.proquest.com/docview/51991245?accountid=14244 L2 - http://vb3lk7eb4t.search.serialssolutions.com/?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&rfr_id=info:sid/GeoRef&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=book&rft.jtitle=&rft.atitle=&rft.au=Kurtak%2C+Joseph+M%3BKlieforth%2C+Robert+F%3BClark%2C+John+M%3BMaclean%2C+Elizabeth+A&rft.aulast=Kurtak&rft.aufirst=Joseph&rft.date=2002-07-01&rft.volume=&rft.issue=&rft.spage=&rft.isbn=&rft.btitle=Mineral+investigations+in+the+Koyukuk+mining+district%2C+Northern+Alaska%3B+Volume+I%2C+Introductory+text+and+summaries+of+mines%2C+prospects%2C+and+mineral+occurrences+in+the+Bettles%2C+Chandalar%2C+Chandler+Lake%2C+and+Hughes+quadrangles%3B+Volume+II%2C+Summaries+of+mines%2C+prospects%2C+and+mineral+occurrences+in+the+Melozitna%2C+Survey+Pass%2C+Tanana%2C+and+Wiseman+quadrangles&rft.title=Mineral+investigations+in+the+Koyukuk+mining+district%2C+Northern+Alaska%3B+Volume+I%2C+Introductory+text+and+summaries+of+mines%2C+prospects%2C+and+mineral+occurrences+in+the+Bettles%2C+Chandalar%2C+Chandler+Lake%2C+and+Hughes+quadrangles%3B+Volume+II%2C+Summaries+of+mines%2C+prospects%2C+and+mineral+occurrences+in+the+Melozitna%2C+Survey+Pass%2C+Tanana%2C+and+Wiseman+quadrangles&rft.issn=&rft_id=info:doi/ L2 - http://www.blm.gov/ak/st/en/info/gen_pubs/tr.html LA - English DB - GeoRef N1 - Copyright - GeoRef, Copyright 2012, American Geosciences Institute. N1 - Date revised - 2003-01-01 N1 - PubXState - AK N1 - SuppNotes - In two volumes N1 - Last updated - 2012-06-07 N1 - CODEN - #04969 N1 - SubjectsTermNotLitGenreText - Alaska; chromite ores; coal; epithermal processes; geologic maps; gold ores; host rocks; Koyukuk mining district; maps; massive deposits; massive sulfide deposits; Melozitna Quadrangle; metal ores; metallogeny; mineral deposits, genesis; mineral exploration; mineral resources; mines; Northern Alaska; resources; sedimentary rocks; spatial distribution; Survey Pass Quadrangle; Tanana Quadrangle; tin ores; United States; Wiseman Quadrangle ER - TY - JOUR T1 - Invasive Species Program: Snakeheads-The Newest Aquatic Invader AN - 14658427; 10643004 AB - The snakehead, a non-native air-breathing freshwater fish, is the latest invasive species to threaten native fish and wildlife resources in the US. Four species have been found in the US, with reproducing populations documented in Florida and Maryland. Experts believe that some entered US waters via releases by aquarium owners and some via the live food fish trade by people releasing these fish to establish a local food source. The predatory behavior of snakeheads could drastically alter the array of native species and disrupt the ecological balance of native aquatic systems. FWS is working with the Maryland Department of Natural Resources to eradicate these fish, and is collaborating with USGS in conducting a risk assessment for snakeheads. JF - USGS/FWS Report Y1 - 2002/07// PY - 2002 DA - Jul 2002 PB - USGS/FWS, The Boulevard Kidlington Oxford OX5 1GB KW - Environment Abstracts KW - ENV ACTION, FEDERAL KW - SPECIES POLLUTION KW - PREDATOR CONTROL KW - ECOLOGICAL BALANCE KW - FISH, FRESHWATER KW - INTRODUCTION, SPECIES KW - ENA 07:General UR - http://libproxy.lib.unc.edu/login?url=http://search.proquest.com/docview/14658427?accountid=14244 L2 - http://vb3lk7eb4t.search.serialssolutions.com/?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&rfr_id=info:sid/ProQ%3Aenvabstractsmodule&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.jtitle=USGS+Fact+Sheet+017-01&rft.atitle=The+San+Francisco+Volcanic+Field%2C+Arizona&rft.au=&rft.aulast=&rft.aufirst=&rft.date=2001-01-01&rft.volume=&rft.issue=&rft.spage=&rft.isbn=&rft.btitle=&rft.title=USGS+Fact+Sheet+017-01&rft.issn=&rft_id=info:doi/ L2 - http://www.csa.com/htbin/envabs.cgi?pdf=03-09961.pdf LA - English DB - ProQuest Environmental Science Collection N1 - Date revised - 2009-08-01 N1 - Document feature - |n 2 |t photos N1 - Last updated - 2011-12-15 N1 - SubjectsTermNotLitGenreText - SPECIES POLLUTION; PREDATOR CONTROL; ECOLOGICAL BALANCE; FISH, FRESHWATER; INTRODUCTION, SPECIES; ENV ACTION, FEDERAL ER - TY - RPRT T1 - BIA Special Education Coordinated Services Plan. AN - 62154741; ED482999 AB - Provisions in the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) Amendments of 1997 called for improved collaboration and coordination among tribal, federal, state, and local agencies in providing special education and related services to Indian children with disabilities. To meet these requirements, input was elicited from public meetings, a steering committee composed of relevant stakeholders, a Bureau of Indian Affairs (BIA) Special Education Advisory Board, surveys of BIA staff, a focus group of stakeholders, a roundtable discussion at the National Indian Education Association's legislative summit, and 10 tribal consultation meetings. Findings and recommendations focused on: (1) developing strategies to ensure that students in BIA-funded schools are not inappropriately referred to special education; (2) engaging national Indian education organizations and the Council for Exceptional Children in support of full funding of early childhood intervention programs for at-risk children, full funding of IDEA, and increased funding for research, preparation of American Indian personnel, technical assistance, and other supports to institutions of higher education (especially tribal colleges and universities), BIA education personnel and parents; (3) establishing agreements with other federal agencies to collect data on student postsecondary employment and education in order to ensure greater accountability for post-school results and facilitate transition planning for special education students; and (4) encouraging agreements among federal, state, and tribal agencies with authority over alternative education services or coordinated services for Indian children with disabilities. Appendices present an inventory of agencies and service providers and sample memoranda of agreements. (TD) Y1 - 2002/06/30/ PY - 2002 DA - 2002 Jun 30 SP - 57 KW - Bureau of Indian Affairs Schools KW - Individuals with Disabilities Educ Act Amend 1997 KW - Office of Indian Education Programs KW - ERIC, Resources in Education (RIE) KW - Tribally Controlled Education KW - Special Education KW - Indigenous Personnel KW - Agency Cooperation KW - Elementary Secondary Education KW - Early Childhood Education KW - Higher Education KW - American Indian Education KW - Educational Needs KW - Reservation American Indians KW - Federal Indian Relationship UR - http://libproxy.lib.unc.edu/login?url=http://search.proquest.com/docview/62154741?accountid=14244 LA - English DB - ERIC N1 - Last updated - 2017-02-24 ER - TY - RPRT T1 - RENEWAL OF THE FEDERAL GRANT FOR THE TRANS-ALASKA PIPELINE SYSTEM RIGHT-OF-WAY. AN - 16364313; 9697 AB - PURPOSE: The renewal of the federal grant for the Trans-Alaska pipeline system (TAPS) right-of-way (ROW) is proposed. The system was constructed between 1974 and 1977 through the central portion of Alaska on a ROW granted by federal, state, and private landowners. The Agreement and Grant of Right-of-Way for the Trans-Alaska Pipeline was issued on January 23, 1974, and the State Right-of-Way Lease was issued on May 3, 1974. Both ROWs are valid for a period of 30 years. On May 2, 2001, the Bureau of Land Management received an application from the current TAPS owners to renew the federal grant for 30 years beyond the current expiration date. TAPS consists of an 800-mile, 48-inch-diameter warm oil pipeline, 11 pump stations, Valdez Marine Terminal, and various support facilities. Seven pump stations are currently in operation; the remaining four were placed on standby inn 1996 and 1997 due to a decline in throughput and increased use of drag reducing agent. The Valdez Terminal lies at the southern end of Taps on ice-free Port Valdez. Valves are strategically placed along the pipeline to help control the flow of oil and to isolate sections of the line. All valves can be operated manually to maintain the pipeline and isolate spills. A gravel workpad was used for constructing portions of TAPS; it now provides access and a work platform for surveillance and maintenance of the pipeline. The terminal has four tanker-loading berths and storage facilities for 9.18 million barrels of crude oil. Additional TAPS facilities include 284 access roads, 175 of which are included in the federal grant renewal application, a buried natural gas pipeline extending from the North Slope south to Pump Station 4 to provide gas for operations in the pumpstations north of Brooks Range, and an extensive telecommunications network consisting of microwave, satellite, and fiber-optic cable systems to monitor and control pipeline operations. Three alternatives are considered in this final EIS, as follows: 1) renewal of the federal grant for 30 years; 2) renewal of the federal grant for less than 30 years; 3) refusal to renew the federal grant. Renewal of the grant for 30 years is the preferred alternative. POSITIVE IMPACTS: By renewing the federal grant, the government would allow continued use of the pipeline, which transports needed energy resources from the North Slope to Port Valdez for delivery to users throughout the nation. In addition to reducing the nation's dependence on foreign sources of oil, the operation of the pipeline provides local and regional employment and otherwise boosts local and regional economies. NEGATIVE IMPACTS: The pipeline crosses more than 800 rivers and streams. Approximately half the length of the pipeline traverses ice-rich soil that becomes unstable if thawed. To avoid exposing these soils to the warm pipeline, 420 miles of the pipeline are aboveground and are supported by 78,000 vertical support members. The pipeline crosses five seismic zones, though it is designed and constructed to withstand the most severe earthquake that could reasonable be expected in each zone. The pipeline would continue to constitute an barrier to wildlife movements, particularly big game movements, and to degrade habitat that supports subsistence users. Significant spills, though unlikely, would result in substantial ecological, cultural, and socioeconomic impacts. LEGAL MANDATES: Alaska National Interest Lands Conservation Act of 1980 (P.L. 96-487) and Mineral Leasing Act of 1920 (P.L. 94-377). PRIOR REFERENCES: For the abstract of the draft EIS, see 02-0364D, Volume 26, Number 4. JF - EPA number: 020481, Executive Summary--78 pages; Volume 2--451 pages and maps, Volume 3--439 pages and maps, Volume 4--269 pages, Volume 5--511 pages, Volume 6 (Part 1)--774 pages, Volume 6 (Part 2)--691 pages, Volume 6 (Part 3)--531 pages, Volume 6 (Part 4)--358 pages, Map Supplement, June 26, 2002 PY - 2002 KW - Energy KW - Agency number: BLM/AK/PT-03/005+2880+990 KW - Communication Systems KW - Earthquakes KW - Harbors KW - Ice Environments KW - Impact Assessment Methodology KW - Natural Gas KW - Oil Production KW - Oil Spills KW - Pipelines KW - Pumping Plants KW - Rivers KW - Streams KW - Storage KW - Subsistence KW - Terminal Facilities KW - Wildlife Habitat KW - Alaska KW - Alaska National Interest Lands Conservation Act of 1980, Compliance KW - Mineral Leasing Act of 1920, Compliance UR - http://libproxy.lib.unc.edu/login?url=http://search.proquest.com/docview/16364313?accountid=14244 L2 - http://vb3lk7eb4t.search.serialssolutions.com/?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&rfr_id=info:sid/Environmental+Impact+Statements%3A+Digests&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=report&rft.jtitle=&rft.atitle=&rft.au=&rft.aulast=&rft.aufirst=&rft.date=2001-01-01&rft.volume=&rft.issue=&rft.spage=&rft.isbn=&rft.btitle=&rft.title=USGS+Circular+1185-B&rft.issn=&rft_id=info:doi/ LA - English DB - ProQuest Environmental Science Collection N1 - Name - Department of the Interior, Bureau of Land Management, Anchorage, Alaska; DOI N1 - Date revised - 2006-05-01 N1 - SuppNotes - Final. Preparation date: June 26, 2002 N1 - Last updated - 2014-01-30 ER - TY - RPRT T1 - DIAMOND BAR ROAD IMPROVEMENT, MOHAVE COUNTY, ARIZONA. AN - 16350953; 9379 AB - PURPOSE: The improvement of Diamond Bar Road in Mohave County, Arizona is proposed. The Bureau of Indian Affairs has applied to the Bureau of Land Management for rights-of-way to improve the facility. The road provides the principal means of ground access to Grand Canyon West, a tourist facility under development on the western Hualapai Indian Reservation. Currently, the road is unpaved and characterized by steep grades, sharp curves, rough surfaces, occasional washouts, and poor visibility caused by road dust. Three alternatives, including a No Action Alternative (Alternative 1), are considered in this draft EIS. The EIS also addresses two segment options and an entrance realignment option. The proposed action (Alternative 2) would involve paving the road and realigning the section that currently runs through Grapevine Wash to bring the road up to current safety standards. Alternative 3 would adhere more closely to the existing alignment, except where necessary to improve road safety of avoid culturally sensitive areas. Segment options under consideration for both alternatives would be designed to reduce impacts on cultural or visual resources. In addition, the entrance realignment option, which could be implemented under either principal alternative, would establish a new entrance to the road along the existing Smoke Tree Road alignment. Selection of this option would avoid impacts to the Grapevine Mesa Joshua Trees National Natural Landmark (NNL). POSITIVE IMPACTS: The project would improve the safety rating of the road Socioeconomic benefits for the Hualapai Tribe would be significant, as the road would result in growth in tourism at Grand Canyon West. NEGATIVE IMPACTS: The project would result in removal of Joshua trees and associated native vegetation, the primary resource for which the Joshua Tree Forest - Grand Wash Cliffs Area of Critical Environmental Concern and the NNL were designated. Loss of vegetation would affect some visual resource sites and reduce the available wildlife habitat. Traffic volumes would increase on Diamond Bar and Pearce Ferry roads, but expected levels would not create hazardous conditions. All alternatives would impact one archaeological site. LEGAL MANDATES: Department of Transportation Act of 1966, as amended (49 U.S.C. 1651 et seq.) PRIOR REFERENCES: For the abstract of the draft EIS, see 02-0062D, Volume 26, Number 1. JF - EPA number: 020265, 221 pages and maps, June 21, 2002 PY - 2002 KW - Roads and Railroads KW - Agency number: BLM/AZ/PL-02/003 KW - Air Quality KW - Archaeological Sites KW - Cultural Resources KW - Forests KW - Indian Reservations KW - Noise KW - Recreation Resources KW - Roads KW - Safety KW - Socioeconomic Assessments KW - Vegetation KW - Visual Resources KW - Visual Resources Surveys KW - Wildlife KW - Wildlife Habitat KW - Arizona KW - Department of Transportation Act of 1966, Archaeological Sites KW - National Historic Preservation Act of 1966, Archaeological Sites UR - http://libproxy.lib.unc.edu/login?url=http://search.proquest.com/docview/16350953?accountid=14244 L2 - http://vb3lk7eb4t.search.serialssolutions.com/?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&rfr_id=info:sid/Environmental+Impact+Statements%3A+Digests&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=report&rft.jtitle=&rft.atitle=&rft.au=&rft.aulast=&rft.aufirst=&rft.date=2002-06-21&rft.volume=&rft.issue=&rft.spage=&rft.isbn=&rft.btitle=DIAMOND+BAR+ROAD+IMPROVEMENT%2C+MOHAVE+COUNTY%2C+ARIZONA.&rft.title=DIAMOND+BAR+ROAD+IMPROVEMENT%2C+MOHAVE+COUNTY%2C+ARIZONA.&rft.issn=&rft_id=info:doi/ LA - English DB - ProQuest Environmental Science Collection N1 - Name - Department of the Interior, Bureau of Land Management, Kingman, Arizona; DOI N1 - Date revised - 2006-05-01 N1 - SuppNotes - Final. Preparation date: June 21, 2002 N1 - Last updated - 2011-12-16 ER - TY - RPRT T1 - FARMINGTON RESOURCE MANAGEMENT PLAN, SAN JUAN, MCKINLEY, RIO ARRIBA, AND SANDOVAL COUNTIES, NEW MEXICO. AN - 36412975; 9376 AB - PURPOSE: The revision of the general land and resource management plan for the 8.3-million-acre Farmington Planning Area in San Juan, McKinley, Rio Arriba, and Sandoval counties, New Mexico is proposed. Located in northwestern New Mexico, the area, which is administered by the Bureau of Land Management, contains 1.4 million acres of public land and 3.0 million acres of federal minerals estate. Key issues identified during scoping include those associated with oil and gas leasing and development, land ownership adjustments, off-highway vehicle use, the management of specially designated areas, and coal leasing suitability assessments. Four alternatives, including a No Action Alternative (Alternative A), which would perpetuate the current land management regime, are considered in this draft EIS. The preferred alternative (Alternative D) would provide for oil and gas lease developments, coal estate developments, extraction of other minerals, recreational use designations, areas protected for research and preservation, land acquisition and deposition to rationalize management practices, wilderness area management, fish and wildlife habitat management, protection of special status species of plants and animals, rangeland management, transportation systems, visual resources management, and cultural and paleontological resources management. POSITIVE IMPACTS: The preferred alternative would provide balanced management direction for the area. All five key issues would be addressed, providing for a combination of resource uses that would protect important environmental values and sensitive resources, while allowing for development of mineral resources that provide employment and tax revenues to the region. Riparian areas and wetlands would particularly benefit from land use restrictions, and acquisition of inholdings would benefit wilderness areas. The plan would encourage the use of new technology to lessen conflicts between the emphasis areas. NEGATIVE IMPACTS: Mineral extraction and other activities resulting from establishment of the plan would result in disturbance to watershed soils and vegetation, consumption of water, reduction of air quality, emissions of noise, fragmentation of wildlife habitat, continued conflicts between mineral developers and grazing allotment holders, degradation of visual quality, damage to cultural and paleontological resources, and reduction of dispersed and other recreational opportunities. LEGAL MANDATES: Federal Land Policy and Management Act of 1976 (43 U.S.C. 1701 et seq.). JF - EPA number: 020262, 671 pages and maps, June 20, 2002 PY - 2002 KW - Parks, Refuges and Forests KW - Agency number: BLM-NM-PL-02-014-1610 KW - Air Quality Assessments KW - Coal KW - Conservation KW - Cultural Resources KW - Employment KW - Endangered Species (Animals) KW - Endangered Species (Plants) KW - Fish KW - Grazing KW - Land Acquisitions KW - Land Management KW - Leasing KW - Mineral Resources KW - Mineral Resources Management KW - Mining KW - Motor Vehicles KW - Natural Gas KW - Noise Assessments KW - Oil Production KW - Paleontological Sites KW - Property Disposition KW - Range Management KW - Recreation Resources KW - Recreation Resources Management KW - Research KW - Transportation KW - Visual Resources KW - Visual Resources Management KW - Wilderness Management KW - Wildlife Habitat KW - Wildlife Management KW - New Mexico KW - Federal Land Policy and Management Act of 1976, Compliance UR - http://libproxy.lib.unc.edu/login?url=http://search.proquest.com/docview/36412975?accountid=14244 L2 - http://vb3lk7eb4t.search.serialssolutions.com/?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&rfr_id=info:sid/Environmental+Impact+Statements%3A+Digests&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.jtitle=USGS+Circular+1175&rft.atitle=Land-Use+Changes+and+the+Physical+Habitat+of+Streams-A+Review+with+Emphasis+on+Studies+Within+the+U.S.+Geological+Survey+Federal-State+Cooperative+Program&rft.au=Jacobson%2C+Robert+B%3BFemmer%2C+Suzanne+R%3BMcKenney%2C+Rose+A&rft.aulast=Jacobson&rft.aufirst=Robert&rft.date=2001-01-01&rft.volume=&rft.issue=&rft.spage=&rft.isbn=&rft.btitle=&rft.title=USGS+Circular+1175&rft.issn=&rft_id=info:doi/ LA - English DB - ProQuest Environmental Science Collection N1 - Name - Department of the Interior, Bureau of Land Management, Farmington, New Mexico; DOI N1 - Date revised - 2006-05-01 N1 - SuppNotes - Draft. Preparation date: June 20, 2002 N1 - Last updated - 2011-12-16 ER - TY - RPRT T1 - KERN RIVER 2003 EXPANSION PROJECT, CALIFORNIA (DOCKET NO. CP01-422-000). AN - 36411665; 9373 AB - PURPOSE: The issuance of a certificate of public convenience and necessity is proposed for the construction of natural gas pipeline facilities to expand a pipeline system operated by the Kern River Gas Transmission Company (KRGT) from southwestern Wyoming to southern California. The Kern River 2003 Expansion Project would involve the construction of approximately 717.5 miles of pipeline, addition of 163,700 horsepower (hp) of compression at three new and six existing compressor stations, modifications to five existing meter stations, and provision of ancillary facilities. More specifically, KRGT would construct and operate 634.5 miles of 36-inch-diameter pipeline in 12 loops adjacent to KRGT's existing pipeline in Wyoming, Utah, Nevada, and California; 82.2 miles of 42-inch-diameter pipeline in one loop adjacent to the portion of the KRGT pipeline jointly owned with Mojave Pipeline Company in California; 0.8 mile of 12-inch-diameter pipeline lateral in Unita County, Wyoming; three new compressor stations, one each in Wyoming, Utah, and Nevada to provide an additional 60,000 hp of compression; modifications to six existing compressor stations, one in Wyoming, three in Utah, one in Nevada, and one in California to provide an additional 103,700 hp of compression; modifications to one existing meter station in Wyoming and four existing meter stations in California; 24 pig launcher/receiver facilities, 19 within fence lines of the other major aboveground facilities and five located independently along the proposed pipeline route; and 55 mainline valves, 54 located within existing valve sites and one located independently along the Salt Lake Loop. The project would require a special use permit from the Dixie National Forest. POSITIVE IMPACTS: The expanded system would have the capacity to provide an additional 885,626 dekatherms per day of natural gas to customers in Utah, Nevada, and California. The additional capacity would assist these Western states in meeting their energy needs. NEGATIVE IMPACTS: Construction activities would result in disturbance of 10,680.4 acres of land, including 9,282.4 acres of vegetated land and the associated wildlife habitat. Vegetation to be disturbed would include 3,158.2 acres of Mojave creosote-bursage and 2,901.1 acres of sagebrush/sagebrush scrub. Desert vegetation of this sort would require lengthy periods to regenerate, placing the cleared areas in danger of invasion by noxious weeds. Rangeland and agricultural land would be impacted by pipeline construction and operation. Habitat of two endangered animal species would be affected, and 55 other special status species could be affected. The pipeline would traverse 63 wetlands in Wyoming and Utah, resulting in short-term disturbance of 34.9 acres of emergent wetlands, of which 20.1 acres would be located within the permanent rights-of-way. The pipeline would lie within 300 feet of 16 mineral resource areas, affecting access to these resources. Geological hazards such as seismic activity, slope instability, subsidence, flash floods and debris flows, volcanism, and avalanches would be present within portions of the pipeline system. A total of 247 water supply wells would be located within 200 feet of the construction rights-of-way. Seven potential sources of groundwater and/or soil contamination would lie near the proposed pipeline facilities. The pipeline would cross 32 perennial waterbodies, nine of which are coldwater fisheries and three of which are classified as game fish spawning areas. The pipeline would also cross approximately 300 intermittent waterbodies. The construction work area would lie within 50 feet of 26 residences. The pipeline would traverse or lie adjacent to several special management areas administered by the federal government. Historic, archaeological, and paleontological resources would be affected. LEGAL MANDATES: Federal Water Pollution Control Act of 1972 (33 U.S.C. 1251 et seq.), Natural Gas Act (15 U.S.C. 717f(c)), National Historic Preservation Act of 1966, as amended (16 U.S.C. 470 et seq.). PRIOR REFERENCES: For the abstract of the draft EIS, see 02-0132D, Volume 26, Number 2. JF - EPA number: 020259, Final EIS--627 pages, Appendices--611 pages, June 20, 2002 PY - 2002 KW - Energy KW - Agency number: FERC/EIS-0144F KW - Archaeological Sites KW - Air Quality Assessments KW - Desert Land KW - Earthquakes KW - Electric Power KW - Endangered Species (Animals) KW - Farmlands KW - Fish KW - Flood Hazards KW - Historic Sites KW - Hydrologic Assessments KW - Impact Monitoring Plans KW - Mineral Resources KW - Natural Gas KW - Paleontological Sites KW - Pipelines KW - Pumping Plants KW - Ranges KW - Rivers KW - Seismic Surveys KW - Streams KW - Subsidence KW - Vegetation KW - Water Quality KW - Water Quality Assessments KW - Water Supply KW - Wells KW - Wetlands KW - Wildlife Habitat KW - Wildlife Surveys KW - California KW - Dixie National Forest KW - Nevada KW - Utah KW - Wyoming KW - Federal Water Pollution Control Act of 1972, Section 404 Permits KW - Natural Gas Act, Certificates of Pubic Convenience and Necessity KW - National Forest Management Act of 1976, Compliance KW - National Historic Preservation Act of 1966, Compliance UR - http://libproxy.lib.unc.edu/login?url=http://search.proquest.com/docview/36411665?accountid=14244 L2 - http://vb3lk7eb4t.search.serialssolutions.com/?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&rfr_id=info:sid/Environmental+Impact+Statements%3A+Digests&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=report&rft.jtitle=&rft.atitle=&rft.au=&rft.aulast=&rft.aufirst=&rft.date=2001-01-01&rft.volume=&rft.issue=&rft.spage=132&rft.isbn=&rft.btitle=Vegetative+Resistance+to+Flow+in+South+Florida%3A+Summary+of+Vegetation+Sampling+in+Taylor+Slough%2C+Everglades+National+Park%2C+September+1997-July+1998&rft.title=Vegetative+Resistance+to+Flow+in+South+Florida%3A+Summary+of+Vegetation+Sampling+in+Taylor+Slough%2C+Everglades+National+Park%2C+September+1997-July+1998&rft.issn=&rft_id=info:doi/ LA - English DB - ProQuest Environmental Science Collection N1 - Name - Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Office of Energy Projects, Washington, District of Columbia; FERC N1 - Date revised - 2006-05-01 N1 - SuppNotes - Final. Preparation date: June 20, 2002 N1 - Last updated - 2011-12-16 ER - TY - RPRT T1 - YOSEMITE FIRE MANAGEMENT PLAN, YOSEMITE NATIONAL PARK, MADERA, MARIPOSA, MONO AND TUOLUMNE COUNTIES, CALIFORNIA. AN - 36412321; 9371 AB - PURPOSE: The implementation of a revised fire management plan for Yosemite National Park, California is proposed. The park occupies 747,955 acres on the western slope of the Sierra Nevada. Historically, wildland fires occurred naturally throughout the park. These fires constituted an important ecosystem process that kept forest fuels and community structure within their natural range of variability. Past fire suppression activities have led to increases in fuel loads and changes in plant community structure and these developments have increased the potential for catastrophic fires. A Fire Return Interval Departure analysis estimated the number of "missed" fires for all areas of the park and determined which areas are in the greatest need of fire and/or mechanical treatment to restore fuel loads to appropriate levels and forest structure to appropriate conditions. The analysis concluded that at least 38 percent of the park and 62 percent of the administrative site have missed three or more fire return intervals; much of the missed intervals lie within the upper and lower mountain forest communities. These are mid-elevation forest types, and most of the wildland-urban interface in the park is located within them. The risk of catastrophic fire is highest in the areas where fire has been excluded and fuels have built up to hazardous levels. Key issues identified during scoping include those associated with planning direction, fire management activities, community protection, ecosystem management, elements of the natural environment, air quality, wilderness, access to areas within the park, the social environment, and communication, coordination, and consultation with communities, agencies, organizations, and other groups. Four alternatives, including a No Action Alternative (Alternative A), are considered in this draft EIS. The preferred alternative (Alternative D) would use a combination of aggressive and passive fuel reduction technologies to achieve protection, fuel reduction, and ecosystem restoration goals. Aggressive treatment strategies would be employed in he wildland-urban interface if necessary, while prescribed fire and passive reduction techniques would be use to achieve ecosystem restoration goals. The alternative would reduce fuels on approximately 1,095 acres per year for six to eight years in the wildland-urban interface and restore the natural fire regime to areas that have missed three or more fires by treating 1,817 to 9,194 acres per year for 15 to 20 years. POSITIVE IMPACTS: The plan would return the natural role of fire in reducing dangerous levels of wildfire fuels and in maintaining an appropriate forest vegetative structure and the associated wildlife habitat, including wetlands and habitat for special status animal species. Cultural and traditional landscapes would be restored. The threat of fire to the structures within urban-wildland interface would decline significantly. NEGATIVE IMPACTS: Mechanical treatments could affect special status plant species. Mechanical treatments and prescribed burning would degrade the recreational experience of the area, as well as water quality, in the short-term. Short-term effects of treatments would also include increased erosion and sedimentation of receiving waters. The plan would result in the annual consumption of 147,462 gallons of various fuels used in fire management activities. LEGAL MANDATES: National Park Service Organic Act of 1916 (PL Chapter 408, 39 Stat. 535). JF - EPA number: 020257, 767 pages and maps, June 19, 2002 PY - 2002 KW - Parks, Refuges and Forests KW - Air Quality KW - Biologic Assessments KW - Burning (Prescribed) KW - Cultural Resources KW - Cultural Resources Surveys KW - Energy Consumption KW - Fire Control KW - Fire Prevention KW - Fires KW - Historic Sites Surveys KW - National Parks KW - Recreation Resources KW - Vegetation KW - Water Quality KW - Wildlife KW - Wildlife Habitat KW - California KW - Yosemite National Park KW - National Park Service Organic Act of 1916, Compliance UR - http://libproxy.lib.unc.edu/login?url=http://search.proquest.com/docview/36412321?accountid=14244 L2 - http://vb3lk7eb4t.search.serialssolutions.com/?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&rfr_id=info:sid/Environmental+Impact+Statements%3A+Digests&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=report&rft.jtitle=&rft.atitle=&rft.au=&rft.aulast=&rft.aufirst=&rft.date=2002-06-19&rft.volume=&rft.issue=&rft.spage=&rft.isbn=&rft.btitle=YOSEMITE+FIRE+MANAGEMENT+PLAN%2C+YOSEMITE+NATIONAL+PARK%2C+MADERA%2C+MARIPOSA%2C+MONO+AND+TUOLUMNE+COUNTIES%2C+CALIFORNIA.&rft.title=YOSEMITE+FIRE+MANAGEMENT+PLAN%2C+YOSEMITE+NATIONAL+PARK%2C+MADERA%2C+MARIPOSA%2C+MONO+AND+TUOLUMNE+COUNTIES%2C+CALIFORNIA.&rft.issn=&rft_id=info:doi/ LA - English DB - ProQuest Environmental Science Collection N1 - Name - Department of the Interior, National Park Service, Yosemite, California; DOI N1 - Date revised - 2006-05-01 N1 - SuppNotes - Draft. Preparation date: June 19, 2002 N1 - Last updated - 2011-12-16 ER - TY - RPRT T1 - WILSON'S CREEK NATIONAL BATTLEFIELD GENERAL MANAGEMENT PLAN, GREENE AND CHRISTIAN COUNTIES, MISSOURI. AN - 36436251; 9363 AB - PURPOSE: The implementation of a general management plan for Wilson's Creek National Battlefield in Greene and Christian counties, Missouri is proposed. The 1,750-acre battlefield park is approximately 10 miles south of Springfield on the boundary between Green and Christian counties in the southwestern corner of the state. The park was established in 1960 to preserve and commemorate the Battle of Wilson's Creek, the second battle of the Civil War and the first major battle west of the Mississippi River. The park contains 50 archaeological sites, many of which are associated with the battle as well as a number of historic structures, cultural landscapes, and artifacts related to the battle. At the time of the battle, the valley of Wilson's Creek was a thriving agricultural area with several farms and the homes of numerous families. Only a few remnants of this community remain. Three alternatives, including a No Action Alternative (Alternative A), are considered in this draft EIS. The preferred alternative (Alternative B) would focus on efforts to commemorate the battle and emphasize a reflective and contemplative visitor experience. Recreational uses would be allowed but would be managed so as not to conflict with the core mission of the park of the primary visitor experience. Park management would work with local schools, museums, and universities as well as officials and agencies from the cities of Springfield, Battlefield, and Republic, and the two counties with jurisdiction within the area. New interpretive displays, programs led by park rangers along interpretive trails, and self-directed programs would be implemented. Alternative C would focus on Wilson Creek's distinctive combination of site integrity and artifact and archival collections in developing the park as an outstanding research center. Boundary adjustment recommendations could be implemented. POSITIVE IMPACTS: The management plan would protect and preserve the historic and archaeological resources associated with the park, while providing appropriate interpretive services for visitors. NEGATIVE IMPACTS: Though no additional access points would be developed, construction of parking facilities could result in the loss of vegetation. LEGAL MANDATES: Arizona Desert Act (P.L. 101-628) and National Park Service Organic Act of 1916 (PL Chapter 408, 39 Stat. 535). JF - EPA number: 020249, 128 pages and maps, June 14, 2002 PY - 2002 KW - Parks, Refuges and Forests KW - Agency number: DES 02-24 KW - Agriculture KW - Archaeological Sites KW - Cultural Resources KW - Historic Districts KW - Historic Sites KW - Land Management KW - Museums KW - National Parks KW - Parking KW - Recreation Facilities KW - Recreation Resources KW - Recreation Resources Management KW - Trails KW - Vegetation KW - Water Quality KW - Missouri KW - Wilson's Creek National Battlefield KW - Arizona Desert Act, Compliance KW - National Park Service Organic Act of 1916, Compliance UR - http://libproxy.lib.unc.edu/login?url=http://search.proquest.com/docview/36436251?accountid=14244 L2 - http://vb3lk7eb4t.search.serialssolutions.com/?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&rfr_id=info:sid/Environmental+Impact+Statements%3A+Digests&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=report&rft.jtitle=&rft.atitle=&rft.au=&rft.aulast=&rft.aufirst=&rft.date=2002-06-14&rft.volume=&rft.issue=&rft.spage=&rft.isbn=&rft.btitle=WILSON%27S+CREEK+NATIONAL+BATTLEFIELD+GENERAL+MANAGEMENT+PLAN%2C+GREENE+AND+CHRISTIAN+COUNTIES%2C+MISSOURI.&rft.title=WILSON%27S+CREEK+NATIONAL+BATTLEFIELD+GENERAL+MANAGEMENT+PLAN%2C+GREENE+AND+CHRISTIAN+COUNTIES%2C+MISSOURI.&rft.issn=&rft_id=info:doi/ LA - English DB - ProQuest Environmental Science Collection N1 - Name - Department of the Interior, National Park Service, Republic, Missouri; DOI N1 - Date revised - 2006-05-01 N1 - SuppNotes - Draft. Preparation date: June 14, 2002 N1 - Last updated - 2011-12-16 ER - TY - RPRT T1 - AMERICAN RIVER PUMP STATION PROJECT, PLACER COUNTY, CALIFORNIA. AN - 36435140; 9364 AB - PURPOSE: The development of a year-round water diversion facility capable of diverting up to 35,500 acre-feet annually from the Placer County Water Agency (PCWA) water entitlements under the PCWA's Middle Fork Project on the American River in California is proposed. The project would involve providing PCWA with the year-round access to the MFP water entitlements from the American River as was the case before its' pumps were removed in 1972 by the Bureau of Reclamation (Reclamation). Three alternatives, including a No Action Alternative, are considered in this final EIS. The action alternatives would consist of construction of a diversion and intake structure, pump station, and associated facilities, including pipelines, access roads, power lines, and safety features, in the American River Canyon within the Auburn Dam construction area. Reclamation and PCWA are currently negotiating a contract that would define the terms and conditions upon within the ownership of the facilities would be transferred to PCWA; transfer of ownership would include the transfer of responsibilities for operation, maintenance, and related activities with respect to the project. The preferred alternative would involve restoration of the currently de-watered river segment near Auburn and closure of the bypass tunnel. Additional improvements would be implemented to ensure public safety and access near the project area. More specifically, the preferred alternative would involve construction of a new pump station, incorporating five turbine pumps, above the 100-year flood level; construction of a water diversion/intake structure; installation of a fish screen; closure of the bypass tunnel; restoration of flow to the American River channel; installation of water conveyance pipelines; improvements and development of all-weather access roads for project construction and operation purposes; extension of power supply lines; and creation of public river access sites at the dam site near Oregon Bar. POSITIVE IMPACTS: Project facilities would allow PCWA to convey its water entitlement to the Auburn Ravine Tunnel, referred to locally as the Ophir Tunnel, to meet demands within its service area; to eliminate safety hazards associated with the Auburn Dam bypass tunnel; and to allow for all pre-dam uses of the water in what is now the dewatered river channel. Pre-dam benefits include recreational uses, navigational water releases, and other instream benefits. NEGATIVE IMPACTS: Increased diversion of water by PCWA would reduce releases to regional watercourses, including North Fork American River, Folsom Reservoir, the lower American River, and other Central Valley Project system components. These impacts could affect special-status species, wetlands, recreational activities associated with the watercourses, and flood control measures as well as the related land uses. LEGAL MANDATES: Federal Water Pollution Control Act of 1972 (33 U.S.C. 1251 et seq.) and River and Harbor Act of 1899 (33 U.S.C. 401 et seq.). PRIOR REFERENCES: For the abstract of the draft EIS, see 01-0489D, Volume 25, Number 4. JF - EPA number: 020250, Executive Summary--124 pages and maps, Final EIS--587 pages and maps, Appendix C (Volume 1)--114 pages, Appendix C (Volume 2)--571 pages, Appendix D--44 pages and maps, June 14, 2002 PY - 2002 KW - Water KW - Agency number: FES 02-18 KW - Dams KW - Diversion Structures KW - Endangered Species (Animals) KW - Fish KW - Fisheries Surveys KW - Flood Control KW - Hydrologic Assessments KW - Impact Monitoring Plans KW - Pipelines KW - Pumping Plants KW - Wetlands KW - Recreation Resources KW - Reservoirs KW - Rivers KW - Roads KW - Safety KW - Transmission Lines KW - Turbines KW - Water Supply KW - Wildlife Surveys KW - American River KW - California KW - Federal Water Pollution Control Act of 1972, Section 404 Permits KW - River and Harbor Act of 1899, Section 10 Permits UR - http://libproxy.lib.unc.edu/login?url=http://search.proquest.com/docview/36435140?accountid=14244 L2 - http://vb3lk7eb4t.search.serialssolutions.com/?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&rfr_id=info:sid/Environmental+Impact+Statements%3A+Digests&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=report&rft.jtitle=&rft.atitle=&rft.au=&rft.aulast=&rft.aufirst=&rft.date=2002-06-14&rft.volume=&rft.issue=&rft.spage=&rft.isbn=&rft.btitle=AMERICAN+RIVER+PUMP+STATION+PROJECT%2C+PLACER+COUNTY%2C+CALIFORNIA.&rft.title=AMERICAN+RIVER+PUMP+STATION+PROJECT%2C+PLACER+COUNTY%2C+CALIFORNIA.&rft.issn=&rft_id=info:doi/ LA - English DB - ProQuest Environmental Science Collection N1 - Name - Department of the Interior, Bureau of Reclamation, Sacramento, California; DOI N1 - Date revised - 2006-05-01 N1 - SuppNotes - Final. Preparation date: June 14, 2002 N1 - Last updated - 2011-12-16 ER - TY - RPRT T1 - LAS CIENEGAS RESOURCE MANAGEMENT PLAN, SANTA CRUZE COUNTY, ARIZONA. AN - 36419565; 9361 AB - PURPOSE: The implementation of a comprehensive land and resources management plan for the Las Cienegas National Conservation Area (NCA) and the Sonoita Valley Acquisition Planning District in Santa Cruze County, Arizona is proposed. The two areas encompass 49,000 acres of public land and resources, which include five of the rarest habitat types in the Southwest, habitat for several endangered species, a site on the National Register of Historic Places, two proposed wild and scenic river segments, and scenic open space. The plan would incorporate the latest version of the Empire-Cienega RCA plan, which was nearing completion with the NCA was designated. The management plan would encompass, most importantly watershed resources, wildlife habitat, cultural resources, grazing allotments, and recreation resources. Four alternatives, including a No Action Alternative (Alternative 1), are considered in this final EIS. The preferred alternative (Alternative 2) would emphasize ecosystem management and the use of partnerships and collaboration during implementation. Biennially, a biological planning team would collaboratively evaluate monitoring data and issues relating to livestock grazing, recreation, and wildlife management; designation of all public lands within the planning area as an area of critical environmental concern to protect sensitive riparian and wetland habitats; continuation of livestock grazing on public land allotments, with stipulations for variable stocking rates and flexible rotation; designation of two utility corridors and a corridor for the Arizona Trail; closure or restriction of certain roads to provide for a mix of motorized and non-motorized recreation while ensuring the maintenance of desired resource conditions; and restriction of both mechanized and motorized vehicles to designated routes. The implementation of salvage harvesting and other fuels management activities within the Love-Hungry Fuels Reduction Project Area on the Calaveras Ranger District of the Stanislaus National Forest, Calaveras and Tuolumne counties, California is proposed. In September 2001, a fire in the area burned 14,200 acres of land, of which 10,700 were National Forest system lands. The fire caused multiple evacuations of residents along the canyon rim in Forest Meadows, Darby Knob, Sunrise Point, Canyon View, Doud's Landing, and Love Creek. As a result of the fire, damaged and dead trees and other fuels remain in the area. Three alternatives, including a No Action Alternative (Alternative 1), are considered in this draft EIS. Alternative 2 would involve thinning of green stands of trees, brush control, prescribed burning, removal of fire-killed trees, road reconstruction, temporary road construction, new road construction, and post-harvest fuel treatments. Timber harvest and related activities would generate 7.0 million board-feet (MMBF) of sawtimber and 13,990 tons of biomass material from activities within the urban-wildland intermix areas, 1.9 MMBF of sawtimber and 5,295 tons of biomass material from old-growth forest areas, and 6.5 MMBF of sawtimber and 3,836 tons of biomass from general forest areas. Alternative 3 would involve only the removal of fire-killed trees within the fire area, road reconstruction, temporary road construction, new road construction, and post-harvest fuel treatments. Timber harvest and related activities would generate 5.5 MMBF of sawtimber and 7,270 tons of biomass material from activities within the urban-wildland intermix areas, 1.1 MMBF of sawtimber and 2,495 tons of biomass material from old-growth forest areas, and 6.5 MMBF of sawtimber and 6,686 tons of biomass material from general forest areas. Costs for brush control, prescribed burning, and biomass removal for Alternative 2 are estimated at $87,900, $368,400, and $547,562, respectively. Respective figures for these costs for Alternative 3 are estimated at $0.00, $260,000, and $444,177. POSITIVE IMPACTS: The plan would conserve, protect, and enhance the unique and nationally important aquatic, wildlife, vegetation, archaeological, paleontological, scientific, cave, cultural, historical, recreational, educational, scenic, rangeland, and riparian resources and values of the public lands within the NCA. Road restrictions and closures would result in minor long-term improvement in air quality. Watershed conditions would improve due to grazing allotment management stipulations and the ecosystem approach to be implemented. Alternative 2 would result in the reduction of fuels and maintenance of fuelbreaks in the urban-wildland intermix area in areas both inside and outside the Darby Fire boundary, as well as reduction of fuels inside the fire boundary to contribute to the restoration of old-growth forest conditions. Alternative 3 would result in the reduction of fuels inside the fire boundary in both the urban-wildland intermix areas and areas that would contribute to the restoration of old-growth forest conditions. Net revenues for Alternative 2 would amount to $2.1 million, less $236,000 for road costs and cost for post-harvest treatments. Net revenues for Alternative 3 would amount to $1.8 million, less $219,000 for road costs and cost for post-harvest treatments. NEGATIVE IMPACTS: Developments allowed under the preferred alternative would disturb 2,400 acres, resulting in loss of vegetation, soil disturbance, and the sedimentation of receiving waters. The plan would result in short-term degradation of air quality due to prescribed burning. Dispersed recreation activities on 44,387 acres of land would result in additional losses of vegetation, soil disturbance and the associated impacts. Livestock grazing impacts would affect 42,155 acres. Development of mining claims could affect 6,373 acres Prescribed burning, road construction and reconstruction, thinning activities, and related management would result in short-term disturbance to vegetation, erosion, and sedimentation of receiving surface flows. Burning would result in short-term degradation of local air quality. Some old-growth forest characteristics would be lost to management activities. LEGAL MANDATES: Federal Land Policy and Management Act of 1976 (43 U.S.C. 1701 et seq.) and National Forest Management Act of 1976 (16 U.S.C. 1600 et seq.). PRIOR REFERENCES: For the abstract of the draft EIS, see 01-0418D, Volume 25, Number 4.ETI: BROWN DARBY FUEL REDUCTION PROJECT, CALAVERAS RANGER DISTRICT, STANISLAUS NATIONAL FOREST, CALAVERAS AND TUOLUMNE COUNTIES, CALIFORNIA. JF - EPA number: 020246, 715 pages, June 14, 2002 PY - 2002 KW - Parks, Refuges and Forests KW - Agency number: BLM/AZ/PL-02/004 KW - Archaeological Sites KW - Biologic Assessments KW - Burning (Prescribed) KW - Endangered Species (Animals) KW - Endangered Species (Plants) KW - Grazing KW - Historic Sites KW - Land Management KW - Livestock KW - Mining KW - Motor Vehicles KW - Open Space KW - Paleontological Sites KW - Range Management KW - Recreation Resources Management KW - Roads KW - Scenic Areas KW - Trails KW - Transmission Lines KW - Vegetation KW - Vegetation Surveys KW - Watersheds KW - Wetlands KW - Wild and Scenic Rivers KW - Wildlife Habitat KW - Wildlife Management KW - Wildlife Surveys KW - Economic Assessments KW - Fire Prevention KW - Fires KW - Forests KW - Hydrologic Assessments KW - Soils Surveys KW - Timber KW - Timber Management KW - Arizona KW - Las Cienegas National Conservation Area KW - Sonoita Valley Acquisition Planning District KW - California KW - Stanislaus National Forest KW - Federal Land Policy and Management Act of 1976, Compliance KW - National Forest Management Act of 1976, Compliance UR - http://libproxy.lib.unc.edu/login?url=http://search.proquest.com/docview/36419565?accountid=14244 L2 - http://vb3lk7eb4t.search.serialssolutions.com/?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&rfr_id=info:sid/Environmental+Impact+Statements%3A+Digests&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=report&rft.jtitle=&rft.atitle=&rft.au=&rft.aulast=&rft.aufirst=&rft.date=2002-06-14&rft.volume=&rft.issue=&rft.spage=&rft.isbn=&rft.btitle=LAS+CIENEGAS+RESOURCE+MANAGEMENT+PLAN%2C+SANTA+CRUZE+COUNTY%2C+ARIZONA.&rft.title=LAS+CIENEGAS+RESOURCE+MANAGEMENT+PLAN%2C+SANTA+CRUZE+COUNTY%2C+ARIZONA.&rft.issn=&rft_id=info:doi/ LA - English DB - ProQuest Environmental Science Collection N1 - Name - Department of the Interior, Bureau of Land Management, Tuscon, Arizona; DOI N1 - Date revised - 2006-05-01 N1 - SuppNotes - Final. Preparation date: June 14, 2002 N1 - Last updated - 2011-12-16 ER - TY - RPRT T1 - AMERICAN RIVER PUMP STATION PROJECT, PLACER COUNTY, CALIFORNIA. [Part 4 of 7] T2 - AMERICAN RIVER PUMP STATION PROJECT, PLACER COUNTY, CALIFORNIA. AN - 36387681; 9364-020250_0004 AB - PURPOSE: The development of a year-round water diversion facility capable of diverting up to 35,500 acre-feet annually from the Placer County Water Agency (PCWA) water entitlements under the PCWA's Middle Fork Project on the American River in California is proposed. The project would involve providing PCWA with the year-round access to the MFP water entitlements from the American River as was the case before its' pumps were removed in 1972 by the Bureau of Reclamation (Reclamation). Three alternatives, including a No Action Alternative, are considered in this final EIS. The action alternatives would consist of construction of a diversion and intake structure, pump station, and associated facilities, including pipelines, access roads, power lines, and safety features, in the American River Canyon within the Auburn Dam construction area. Reclamation and PCWA are currently negotiating a contract that would define the terms and conditions upon within the ownership of the facilities would be transferred to PCWA; transfer of ownership would include the transfer of responsibilities for operation, maintenance, and related activities with respect to the project. The preferred alternative would involve restoration of the currently de-watered river segment near Auburn and closure of the bypass tunnel. Additional improvements would be implemented to ensure public safety and access near the project area. More specifically, the preferred alternative would involve construction of a new pump station, incorporating five turbine pumps, above the 100-year flood level; construction of a water diversion/intake structure; installation of a fish screen; closure of the bypass tunnel; restoration of flow to the American River channel; installation of water conveyance pipelines; improvements and development of all-weather access roads for project construction and operation purposes; extension of power supply lines; and creation of public river access sites at the dam site near Oregon Bar. POSITIVE IMPACTS: Project facilities would allow PCWA to convey its water entitlement to the Auburn Ravine Tunnel, referred to locally as the Ophir Tunnel, to meet demands within its service area; to eliminate safety hazards associated with the Auburn Dam bypass tunnel; and to allow for all pre-dam uses of the water in what is now the dewatered river channel. Pre-dam benefits include recreational uses, navigational water releases, and other instream benefits. NEGATIVE IMPACTS: Increased diversion of water by PCWA would reduce releases to regional watercourses, including North Fork American River, Folsom Reservoir, the lower American River, and other Central Valley Project system components. These impacts could affect special-status species, wetlands, recreational activities associated with the watercourses, and flood control measures as well as the related land uses. LEGAL MANDATES: Federal Water Pollution Control Act of 1972 (33 U.S.C. 1251 et seq.) and River and Harbor Act of 1899 (33 U.S.C. 401 et seq.). PRIOR REFERENCES: For the abstract of the draft EIS, see 01-0489D, Volume 25, Number 4. JF - EPA number: 020250, Executive Summary--124 pages and maps, Final EIS--587 pages and maps, Appendix C (Volume 1)--114 pages, Appendix C (Volume 2)--571 pages, Appendix D--44 pages and maps, June 14, 2002 PY - 2002 VL - 4 KW - Water KW - Agency number: FES 02-18 KW - Dams KW - Diversion Structures KW - Endangered Species (Animals) KW - Fish KW - Fisheries Surveys KW - Flood Control KW - Hydrologic Assessments KW - Impact Monitoring Plans KW - Pipelines KW - Pumping Plants KW - Wetlands KW - Recreation Resources KW - Reservoirs KW - Rivers KW - Roads KW - Safety KW - Transmission Lines KW - Turbines KW - Water Supply KW - Wildlife Surveys KW - American River KW - California KW - Federal Water Pollution Control Act of 1972, Section 404 Permits KW - River and Harbor Act of 1899, Section 10 Permits UR - http://libproxy.lib.unc.edu/login?url=http://search.proquest.com/docview/36387681?accountid=14244 L2 - http://vb3lk7eb4t.search.serialssolutions.com/?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&rfr_id=info:sid/Environmental+Impact+Statements%3A+Full+Text&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=report&rft.jtitle=&rft.atitle=&rft.au=&rft.aulast=&rft.aufirst=&rft.date=2002-06-14&rft.volume=&rft.issue=&rft.spage=&rft.isbn=&rft.btitle=AMERICAN+RIVER+PUMP+STATION+PROJECT%2C+PLACER+COUNTY%2C+CALIFORNIA.&rft.title=AMERICAN+RIVER+PUMP+STATION+PROJECT%2C+PLACER+COUNTY%2C+CALIFORNIA.&rft.issn=&rft_id=info:doi/ LA - English DB - ProQuest Environmental Science Collection N1 - Name - Department of the Interior, Bureau of Reclamation, Sacramento, California; DOI N1 - Date revised - 2006-05-01 N1 - SuppNotes - Final. Preparation date: June 14, 2002 N1 - Last updated - 2011-12-16 ER - TY - RPRT T1 - AMERICAN RIVER PUMP STATION PROJECT, PLACER COUNTY, CALIFORNIA. [Part 3 of 7] T2 - AMERICAN RIVER PUMP STATION PROJECT, PLACER COUNTY, CALIFORNIA. AN - 36381014; 9364-020250_0003 AB - PURPOSE: The development of a year-round water diversion facility capable of diverting up to 35,500 acre-feet annually from the Placer County Water Agency (PCWA) water entitlements under the PCWA's Middle Fork Project on the American River in California is proposed. The project would involve providing PCWA with the year-round access to the MFP water entitlements from the American River as was the case before its' pumps were removed in 1972 by the Bureau of Reclamation (Reclamation). Three alternatives, including a No Action Alternative, are considered in this final EIS. The action alternatives would consist of construction of a diversion and intake structure, pump station, and associated facilities, including pipelines, access roads, power lines, and safety features, in the American River Canyon within the Auburn Dam construction area. Reclamation and PCWA are currently negotiating a contract that would define the terms and conditions upon within the ownership of the facilities would be transferred to PCWA; transfer of ownership would include the transfer of responsibilities for operation, maintenance, and related activities with respect to the project. The preferred alternative would involve restoration of the currently de-watered river segment near Auburn and closure of the bypass tunnel. Additional improvements would be implemented to ensure public safety and access near the project area. More specifically, the preferred alternative would involve construction of a new pump station, incorporating five turbine pumps, above the 100-year flood level; construction of a water diversion/intake structure; installation of a fish screen; closure of the bypass tunnel; restoration of flow to the American River channel; installation of water conveyance pipelines; improvements and development of all-weather access roads for project construction and operation purposes; extension of power supply lines; and creation of public river access sites at the dam site near Oregon Bar. POSITIVE IMPACTS: Project facilities would allow PCWA to convey its water entitlement to the Auburn Ravine Tunnel, referred to locally as the Ophir Tunnel, to meet demands within its service area; to eliminate safety hazards associated with the Auburn Dam bypass tunnel; and to allow for all pre-dam uses of the water in what is now the dewatered river channel. Pre-dam benefits include recreational uses, navigational water releases, and other instream benefits. NEGATIVE IMPACTS: Increased diversion of water by PCWA would reduce releases to regional watercourses, including North Fork American River, Folsom Reservoir, the lower American River, and other Central Valley Project system components. These impacts could affect special-status species, wetlands, recreational activities associated with the watercourses, and flood control measures as well as the related land uses. LEGAL MANDATES: Federal Water Pollution Control Act of 1972 (33 U.S.C. 1251 et seq.) and River and Harbor Act of 1899 (33 U.S.C. 401 et seq.). PRIOR REFERENCES: For the abstract of the draft EIS, see 01-0489D, Volume 25, Number 4. JF - EPA number: 020250, Executive Summary--124 pages and maps, Final EIS--587 pages and maps, Appendix C (Volume 1)--114 pages, Appendix C (Volume 2)--571 pages, Appendix D--44 pages and maps, June 14, 2002 PY - 2002 VL - 3 KW - Water KW - Agency number: FES 02-18 KW - Dams KW - Diversion Structures KW - Endangered Species (Animals) KW - Fish KW - Fisheries Surveys KW - Flood Control KW - Hydrologic Assessments KW - Impact Monitoring Plans KW - Pipelines KW - Pumping Plants KW - Wetlands KW - Recreation Resources KW - Reservoirs KW - Rivers KW - Roads KW - Safety KW - Transmission Lines KW - Turbines KW - Water Supply KW - Wildlife Surveys KW - American River KW - California KW - Federal Water Pollution Control Act of 1972, Section 404 Permits KW - River and Harbor Act of 1899, Section 10 Permits UR - http://libproxy.lib.unc.edu/login?url=http://search.proquest.com/docview/36381014?accountid=14244 L2 - http://vb3lk7eb4t.search.serialssolutions.com/?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&rfr_id=info:sid/Environmental+Impact+Statements%3A+Full+Text&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=report&rft.jtitle=&rft.atitle=&rft.au=&rft.aulast=&rft.aufirst=&rft.date=2002-06-14&rft.volume=&rft.issue=&rft.spage=&rft.isbn=&rft.btitle=AMERICAN+RIVER+PUMP+STATION+PROJECT%2C+PLACER+COUNTY%2C+CALIFORNIA.&rft.title=AMERICAN+RIVER+PUMP+STATION+PROJECT%2C+PLACER+COUNTY%2C+CALIFORNIA.&rft.issn=&rft_id=info:doi/ LA - English DB - ProQuest Environmental Science Collection N1 - Name - Department of the Interior, Bureau of Reclamation, Sacramento, California; DOI N1 - Date revised - 2006-05-01 N1 - SuppNotes - Final. Preparation date: June 14, 2002 N1 - Last updated - 2011-12-16 ER - TY - RPRT T1 - AMERICAN RIVER PUMP STATION PROJECT, PLACER COUNTY, CALIFORNIA. [Part 2 of 7] T2 - AMERICAN RIVER PUMP STATION PROJECT, PLACER COUNTY, CALIFORNIA. AN - 36380947; 9364-020250_0002 AB - PURPOSE: The development of a year-round water diversion facility capable of diverting up to 35,500 acre-feet annually from the Placer County Water Agency (PCWA) water entitlements under the PCWA's Middle Fork Project on the American River in California is proposed. The project would involve providing PCWA with the year-round access to the MFP water entitlements from the American River as was the case before its' pumps were removed in 1972 by the Bureau of Reclamation (Reclamation). Three alternatives, including a No Action Alternative, are considered in this final EIS. The action alternatives would consist of construction of a diversion and intake structure, pump station, and associated facilities, including pipelines, access roads, power lines, and safety features, in the American River Canyon within the Auburn Dam construction area. Reclamation and PCWA are currently negotiating a contract that would define the terms and conditions upon within the ownership of the facilities would be transferred to PCWA; transfer of ownership would include the transfer of responsibilities for operation, maintenance, and related activities with respect to the project. The preferred alternative would involve restoration of the currently de-watered river segment near Auburn and closure of the bypass tunnel. Additional improvements would be implemented to ensure public safety and access near the project area. More specifically, the preferred alternative would involve construction of a new pump station, incorporating five turbine pumps, above the 100-year flood level; construction of a water diversion/intake structure; installation of a fish screen; closure of the bypass tunnel; restoration of flow to the American River channel; installation of water conveyance pipelines; improvements and development of all-weather access roads for project construction and operation purposes; extension of power supply lines; and creation of public river access sites at the dam site near Oregon Bar. POSITIVE IMPACTS: Project facilities would allow PCWA to convey its water entitlement to the Auburn Ravine Tunnel, referred to locally as the Ophir Tunnel, to meet demands within its service area; to eliminate safety hazards associated with the Auburn Dam bypass tunnel; and to allow for all pre-dam uses of the water in what is now the dewatered river channel. Pre-dam benefits include recreational uses, navigational water releases, and other instream benefits. NEGATIVE IMPACTS: Increased diversion of water by PCWA would reduce releases to regional watercourses, including North Fork American River, Folsom Reservoir, the lower American River, and other Central Valley Project system components. These impacts could affect special-status species, wetlands, recreational activities associated with the watercourses, and flood control measures as well as the related land uses. LEGAL MANDATES: Federal Water Pollution Control Act of 1972 (33 U.S.C. 1251 et seq.) and River and Harbor Act of 1899 (33 U.S.C. 401 et seq.). PRIOR REFERENCES: For the abstract of the draft EIS, see 01-0489D, Volume 25, Number 4. JF - EPA number: 020250, Executive Summary--124 pages and maps, Final EIS--587 pages and maps, Appendix C (Volume 1)--114 pages, Appendix C (Volume 2)--571 pages, Appendix D--44 pages and maps, June 14, 2002 PY - 2002 VL - 2 KW - Water KW - Agency number: FES 02-18 KW - Dams KW - Diversion Structures KW - Endangered Species (Animals) KW - Fish KW - Fisheries Surveys KW - Flood Control KW - Hydrologic Assessments KW - Impact Monitoring Plans KW - Pipelines KW - Pumping Plants KW - Wetlands KW - Recreation Resources KW - Reservoirs KW - Rivers KW - Roads KW - Safety KW - Transmission Lines KW - Turbines KW - Water Supply KW - Wildlife Surveys KW - American River KW - California KW - Federal Water Pollution Control Act of 1972, Section 404 Permits KW - River and Harbor Act of 1899, Section 10 Permits UR - http://libproxy.lib.unc.edu/login?url=http://search.proquest.com/docview/36380947?accountid=14244 L2 - http://vb3lk7eb4t.search.serialssolutions.com/?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&rfr_id=info:sid/Environmental+Impact+Statements%3A+Full+Text&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=report&rft.jtitle=&rft.atitle=&rft.au=Spitz%2C+F+J&rft.aulast=Spitz&rft.aufirst=F&rft.date=2001-01-01&rft.volume=&rft.issue=&rft.spage=52&rft.isbn=&rft.btitle=Method+and+Computer+Programs+to+Improve+Pathline+Resolution+Near+Weak+Sinks+Representing+Wells+in+Modflow+and+Modpath+Ground-+Water-Flow+Simulations&rft.title=Method+and+Computer+Programs+to+Improve+Pathline+Resolution+Near+Weak+Sinks+Representing+Wells+in+Modflow+and+Modpath+Ground-+Water-Flow+Simulations&rft.issn=&rft_id=info:doi/ LA - English DB - ProQuest Environmental Science Collection N1 - Name - Department of the Interior, Bureau of Reclamation, Sacramento, California; DOI N1 - Date revised - 2006-05-01 N1 - SuppNotes - Final. Preparation date: June 14, 2002 N1 - Last updated - 2011-12-16 ER - TY - RPRT T1 - AMERICAN RIVER PUMP STATION PROJECT, PLACER COUNTY, CALIFORNIA. [Part 1 of 7] T2 - AMERICAN RIVER PUMP STATION PROJECT, PLACER COUNTY, CALIFORNIA. AN - 36379696; 9364-020250_0001 AB - PURPOSE: The development of a year-round water diversion facility capable of diverting up to 35,500 acre-feet annually from the Placer County Water Agency (PCWA) water entitlements under the PCWA's Middle Fork Project on the American River in California is proposed. The project would involve providing PCWA with the year-round access to the MFP water entitlements from the American River as was the case before its' pumps were removed in 1972 by the Bureau of Reclamation (Reclamation). Three alternatives, including a No Action Alternative, are considered in this final EIS. The action alternatives would consist of construction of a diversion and intake structure, pump station, and associated facilities, including pipelines, access roads, power lines, and safety features, in the American River Canyon within the Auburn Dam construction area. Reclamation and PCWA are currently negotiating a contract that would define the terms and conditions upon within the ownership of the facilities would be transferred to PCWA; transfer of ownership would include the transfer of responsibilities for operation, maintenance, and related activities with respect to the project. The preferred alternative would involve restoration of the currently de-watered river segment near Auburn and closure of the bypass tunnel. Additional improvements would be implemented to ensure public safety and access near the project area. More specifically, the preferred alternative would involve construction of a new pump station, incorporating five turbine pumps, above the 100-year flood level; construction of a water diversion/intake structure; installation of a fish screen; closure of the bypass tunnel; restoration of flow to the American River channel; installation of water conveyance pipelines; improvements and development of all-weather access roads for project construction and operation purposes; extension of power supply lines; and creation of public river access sites at the dam site near Oregon Bar. POSITIVE IMPACTS: Project facilities would allow PCWA to convey its water entitlement to the Auburn Ravine Tunnel, referred to locally as the Ophir Tunnel, to meet demands within its service area; to eliminate safety hazards associated with the Auburn Dam bypass tunnel; and to allow for all pre-dam uses of the water in what is now the dewatered river channel. Pre-dam benefits include recreational uses, navigational water releases, and other instream benefits. NEGATIVE IMPACTS: Increased diversion of water by PCWA would reduce releases to regional watercourses, including North Fork American River, Folsom Reservoir, the lower American River, and other Central Valley Project system components. These impacts could affect special-status species, wetlands, recreational activities associated with the watercourses, and flood control measures as well as the related land uses. LEGAL MANDATES: Federal Water Pollution Control Act of 1972 (33 U.S.C. 1251 et seq.) and River and Harbor Act of 1899 (33 U.S.C. 401 et seq.). PRIOR REFERENCES: For the abstract of the draft EIS, see 01-0489D, Volume 25, Number 4. JF - EPA number: 020250, Executive Summary--124 pages and maps, Final EIS--587 pages and maps, Appendix C (Volume 1)--114 pages, Appendix C (Volume 2)--571 pages, Appendix D--44 pages and maps, June 14, 2002 PY - 2002 VL - 1 KW - Water KW - Agency number: FES 02-18 KW - Dams KW - Diversion Structures KW - Endangered Species (Animals) KW - Fish KW - Fisheries Surveys KW - Flood Control KW - Hydrologic Assessments KW - Impact Monitoring Plans KW - Pipelines KW - Pumping Plants KW - Wetlands KW - Recreation Resources KW - Reservoirs KW - Rivers KW - Roads KW - Safety KW - Transmission Lines KW - Turbines KW - Water Supply KW - Wildlife Surveys KW - American River KW - California KW - Federal Water Pollution Control Act of 1972, Section 404 Permits KW - River and Harbor Act of 1899, Section 10 Permits UR - http://libproxy.lib.unc.edu/login?url=http://search.proquest.com/docview/36379696?accountid=14244 L2 - http://vb3lk7eb4t.search.serialssolutions.com/?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&rfr_id=info:sid/Environmental+Impact+Statements%3A+Full+Text&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=report&rft.jtitle=&rft.atitle=&rft.au=&rft.aulast=&rft.aufirst=&rft.date=2002-06-14&rft.volume=&rft.issue=&rft.spage=&rft.isbn=&rft.btitle=AMERICAN+RIVER+PUMP+STATION+PROJECT%2C+PLACER+COUNTY%2C+CALIFORNIA.&rft.title=AMERICAN+RIVER+PUMP+STATION+PROJECT%2C+PLACER+COUNTY%2C+CALIFORNIA.&rft.issn=&rft_id=info:doi/ LA - English DB - ProQuest Environmental Science Collection N1 - Name - Department of the Interior, Bureau of Reclamation, Sacramento, California; DOI N1 - Date revised - 2006-05-01 N1 - SuppNotes - Final. Preparation date: June 14, 2002 N1 - Last updated - 2011-12-16 ER - TY - RPRT T1 - AMERICAN RIVER PUMP STATION PROJECT, PLACER COUNTY, CALIFORNIA. [Part 7 of 7] T2 - AMERICAN RIVER PUMP STATION PROJECT, PLACER COUNTY, CALIFORNIA. AN - 36378712; 9364-020250_0007 AB - PURPOSE: The development of a year-round water diversion facility capable of diverting up to 35,500 acre-feet annually from the Placer County Water Agency (PCWA) water entitlements under the PCWA's Middle Fork Project on the American River in California is proposed. The project would involve providing PCWA with the year-round access to the MFP water entitlements from the American River as was the case before its' pumps were removed in 1972 by the Bureau of Reclamation (Reclamation). Three alternatives, including a No Action Alternative, are considered in this final EIS. The action alternatives would consist of construction of a diversion and intake structure, pump station, and associated facilities, including pipelines, access roads, power lines, and safety features, in the American River Canyon within the Auburn Dam construction area. Reclamation and PCWA are currently negotiating a contract that would define the terms and conditions upon within the ownership of the facilities would be transferred to PCWA; transfer of ownership would include the transfer of responsibilities for operation, maintenance, and related activities with respect to the project. The preferred alternative would involve restoration of the currently de-watered river segment near Auburn and closure of the bypass tunnel. Additional improvements would be implemented to ensure public safety and access near the project area. More specifically, the preferred alternative would involve construction of a new pump station, incorporating five turbine pumps, above the 100-year flood level; construction of a water diversion/intake structure; installation of a fish screen; closure of the bypass tunnel; restoration of flow to the American River channel; installation of water conveyance pipelines; improvements and development of all-weather access roads for project construction and operation purposes; extension of power supply lines; and creation of public river access sites at the dam site near Oregon Bar. POSITIVE IMPACTS: Project facilities would allow PCWA to convey its water entitlement to the Auburn Ravine Tunnel, referred to locally as the Ophir Tunnel, to meet demands within its service area; to eliminate safety hazards associated with the Auburn Dam bypass tunnel; and to allow for all pre-dam uses of the water in what is now the dewatered river channel. Pre-dam benefits include recreational uses, navigational water releases, and other instream benefits. NEGATIVE IMPACTS: Increased diversion of water by PCWA would reduce releases to regional watercourses, including North Fork American River, Folsom Reservoir, the lower American River, and other Central Valley Project system components. These impacts could affect special-status species, wetlands, recreational activities associated with the watercourses, and flood control measures as well as the related land uses. LEGAL MANDATES: Federal Water Pollution Control Act of 1972 (33 U.S.C. 1251 et seq.) and River and Harbor Act of 1899 (33 U.S.C. 401 et seq.). PRIOR REFERENCES: For the abstract of the draft EIS, see 01-0489D, Volume 25, Number 4. JF - EPA number: 020250, Executive Summary--124 pages and maps, Final EIS--587 pages and maps, Appendix C (Volume 1)--114 pages, Appendix C (Volume 2)--571 pages, Appendix D--44 pages and maps, June 14, 2002 PY - 2002 VL - 7 KW - Water KW - Agency number: FES 02-18 KW - Dams KW - Diversion Structures KW - Endangered Species (Animals) KW - Fish KW - Fisheries Surveys KW - Flood Control KW - Hydrologic Assessments KW - Impact Monitoring Plans KW - Pipelines KW - Pumping Plants KW - Wetlands KW - Recreation Resources KW - Reservoirs KW - Rivers KW - Roads KW - Safety KW - Transmission Lines KW - Turbines KW - Water Supply KW - Wildlife Surveys KW - American River KW - California KW - Federal Water Pollution Control Act of 1972, Section 404 Permits KW - River and Harbor Act of 1899, Section 10 Permits UR - http://libproxy.lib.unc.edu/login?url=http://search.proquest.com/docview/36378712?accountid=14244 L2 - http://vb3lk7eb4t.search.serialssolutions.com/?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&rfr_id=info:sid/Environmental+Impact+Statements%3A+Full+Text&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=report&rft.jtitle=&rft.atitle=&rft.au=&rft.aulast=&rft.aufirst=&rft.date=2002-06-14&rft.volume=&rft.issue=&rft.spage=&rft.isbn=&rft.btitle=AMERICAN+RIVER+PUMP+STATION+PROJECT%2C+PLACER+COUNTY%2C+CALIFORNIA.&rft.title=AMERICAN+RIVER+PUMP+STATION+PROJECT%2C+PLACER+COUNTY%2C+CALIFORNIA.&rft.issn=&rft_id=info:doi/ LA - English DB - ProQuest Environmental Science Collection N1 - Name - Department of the Interior, Bureau of Reclamation, Sacramento, California; DOI N1 - Date revised - 2006-05-01 N1 - SuppNotes - Final. Preparation date: June 14, 2002 N1 - Last updated - 2011-12-16 ER - TY - RPRT T1 - AMERICAN RIVER PUMP STATION PROJECT, PLACER COUNTY, CALIFORNIA. [Part 6 of 7] T2 - AMERICAN RIVER PUMP STATION PROJECT, PLACER COUNTY, CALIFORNIA. AN - 36378668; 9364-020250_0006 AB - PURPOSE: The development of a year-round water diversion facility capable of diverting up to 35,500 acre-feet annually from the Placer County Water Agency (PCWA) water entitlements under the PCWA's Middle Fork Project on the American River in California is proposed. The project would involve providing PCWA with the year-round access to the MFP water entitlements from the American River as was the case before its' pumps were removed in 1972 by the Bureau of Reclamation (Reclamation). Three alternatives, including a No Action Alternative, are considered in this final EIS. The action alternatives would consist of construction of a diversion and intake structure, pump station, and associated facilities, including pipelines, access roads, power lines, and safety features, in the American River Canyon within the Auburn Dam construction area. Reclamation and PCWA are currently negotiating a contract that would define the terms and conditions upon within the ownership of the facilities would be transferred to PCWA; transfer of ownership would include the transfer of responsibilities for operation, maintenance, and related activities with respect to the project. The preferred alternative would involve restoration of the currently de-watered river segment near Auburn and closure of the bypass tunnel. Additional improvements would be implemented to ensure public safety and access near the project area. More specifically, the preferred alternative would involve construction of a new pump station, incorporating five turbine pumps, above the 100-year flood level; construction of a water diversion/intake structure; installation of a fish screen; closure of the bypass tunnel; restoration of flow to the American River channel; installation of water conveyance pipelines; improvements and development of all-weather access roads for project construction and operation purposes; extension of power supply lines; and creation of public river access sites at the dam site near Oregon Bar. POSITIVE IMPACTS: Project facilities would allow PCWA to convey its water entitlement to the Auburn Ravine Tunnel, referred to locally as the Ophir Tunnel, to meet demands within its service area; to eliminate safety hazards associated with the Auburn Dam bypass tunnel; and to allow for all pre-dam uses of the water in what is now the dewatered river channel. Pre-dam benefits include recreational uses, navigational water releases, and other instream benefits. NEGATIVE IMPACTS: Increased diversion of water by PCWA would reduce releases to regional watercourses, including North Fork American River, Folsom Reservoir, the lower American River, and other Central Valley Project system components. These impacts could affect special-status species, wetlands, recreational activities associated with the watercourses, and flood control measures as well as the related land uses. LEGAL MANDATES: Federal Water Pollution Control Act of 1972 (33 U.S.C. 1251 et seq.) and River and Harbor Act of 1899 (33 U.S.C. 401 et seq.). PRIOR REFERENCES: For the abstract of the draft EIS, see 01-0489D, Volume 25, Number 4. JF - EPA number: 020250, Executive Summary--124 pages and maps, Final EIS--587 pages and maps, Appendix C (Volume 1)--114 pages, Appendix C (Volume 2)--571 pages, Appendix D--44 pages and maps, June 14, 2002 PY - 2002 VL - 6 KW - Water KW - Agency number: FES 02-18 KW - Dams KW - Diversion Structures KW - Endangered Species (Animals) KW - Fish KW - Fisheries Surveys KW - Flood Control KW - Hydrologic Assessments KW - Impact Monitoring Plans KW - Pipelines KW - Pumping Plants KW - Wetlands KW - Recreation Resources KW - Reservoirs KW - Rivers KW - Roads KW - Safety KW - Transmission Lines KW - Turbines KW - Water Supply KW - Wildlife Surveys KW - American River KW - California KW - Federal Water Pollution Control Act of 1972, Section 404 Permits KW - River and Harbor Act of 1899, Section 10 Permits UR - http://libproxy.lib.unc.edu/login?url=http://search.proquest.com/docview/36378668?accountid=14244 L2 - http://vb3lk7eb4t.search.serialssolutions.com/?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&rfr_id=info:sid/Environmental+Impact+Statements%3A+Full+Text&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=report&rft.jtitle=&rft.atitle=&rft.au=&rft.aulast=&rft.aufirst=&rft.date=2002-06-14&rft.volume=&rft.issue=&rft.spage=&rft.isbn=&rft.btitle=AMERICAN+RIVER+PUMP+STATION+PROJECT%2C+PLACER+COUNTY%2C+CALIFORNIA.&rft.title=AMERICAN+RIVER+PUMP+STATION+PROJECT%2C+PLACER+COUNTY%2C+CALIFORNIA.&rft.issn=&rft_id=info:doi/ LA - English DB - ProQuest Environmental Science Collection N1 - Name - Department of the Interior, Bureau of Reclamation, Sacramento, California; DOI N1 - Date revised - 2006-05-01 N1 - SuppNotes - Final. Preparation date: June 14, 2002 N1 - Last updated - 2011-12-16 ER - TY - RPRT T1 - AMERICAN RIVER PUMP STATION PROJECT, PLACER COUNTY, CALIFORNIA. [Part 5 of 7] T2 - AMERICAN RIVER PUMP STATION PROJECT, PLACER COUNTY, CALIFORNIA. AN - 36378571; 9364-020250_0005 AB - PURPOSE: The development of a year-round water diversion facility capable of diverting up to 35,500 acre-feet annually from the Placer County Water Agency (PCWA) water entitlements under the PCWA's Middle Fork Project on the American River in California is proposed. The project would involve providing PCWA with the year-round access to the MFP water entitlements from the American River as was the case before its' pumps were removed in 1972 by the Bureau of Reclamation (Reclamation). Three alternatives, including a No Action Alternative, are considered in this final EIS. The action alternatives would consist of construction of a diversion and intake structure, pump station, and associated facilities, including pipelines, access roads, power lines, and safety features, in the American River Canyon within the Auburn Dam construction area. Reclamation and PCWA are currently negotiating a contract that would define the terms and conditions upon within the ownership of the facilities would be transferred to PCWA; transfer of ownership would include the transfer of responsibilities for operation, maintenance, and related activities with respect to the project. The preferred alternative would involve restoration of the currently de-watered river segment near Auburn and closure of the bypass tunnel. Additional improvements would be implemented to ensure public safety and access near the project area. More specifically, the preferred alternative would involve construction of a new pump station, incorporating five turbine pumps, above the 100-year flood level; construction of a water diversion/intake structure; installation of a fish screen; closure of the bypass tunnel; restoration of flow to the American River channel; installation of water conveyance pipelines; improvements and development of all-weather access roads for project construction and operation purposes; extension of power supply lines; and creation of public river access sites at the dam site near Oregon Bar. POSITIVE IMPACTS: Project facilities would allow PCWA to convey its water entitlement to the Auburn Ravine Tunnel, referred to locally as the Ophir Tunnel, to meet demands within its service area; to eliminate safety hazards associated with the Auburn Dam bypass tunnel; and to allow for all pre-dam uses of the water in what is now the dewatered river channel. Pre-dam benefits include recreational uses, navigational water releases, and other instream benefits. NEGATIVE IMPACTS: Increased diversion of water by PCWA would reduce releases to regional watercourses, including North Fork American River, Folsom Reservoir, the lower American River, and other Central Valley Project system components. These impacts could affect special-status species, wetlands, recreational activities associated with the watercourses, and flood control measures as well as the related land uses. LEGAL MANDATES: Federal Water Pollution Control Act of 1972 (33 U.S.C. 1251 et seq.) and River and Harbor Act of 1899 (33 U.S.C. 401 et seq.). PRIOR REFERENCES: For the abstract of the draft EIS, see 01-0489D, Volume 25, Number 4. JF - EPA number: 020250, Executive Summary--124 pages and maps, Final EIS--587 pages and maps, Appendix C (Volume 1)--114 pages, Appendix C (Volume 2)--571 pages, Appendix D--44 pages and maps, June 14, 2002 PY - 2002 VL - 5 KW - Water KW - Agency number: FES 02-18 KW - Dams KW - Diversion Structures KW - Endangered Species (Animals) KW - Fish KW - Fisheries Surveys KW - Flood Control KW - Hydrologic Assessments KW - Impact Monitoring Plans KW - Pipelines KW - Pumping Plants KW - Wetlands KW - Recreation Resources KW - Reservoirs KW - Rivers KW - Roads KW - Safety KW - Transmission Lines KW - Turbines KW - Water Supply KW - Wildlife Surveys KW - American River KW - California KW - Federal Water Pollution Control Act of 1972, Section 404 Permits KW - River and Harbor Act of 1899, Section 10 Permits UR - http://libproxy.lib.unc.edu/login?url=http://search.proquest.com/docview/36378571?accountid=14244 L2 - http://vb3lk7eb4t.search.serialssolutions.com/?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&rfr_id=info:sid/Environmental+Impact+Statements%3A+Full+Text&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=report&rft.jtitle=&rft.atitle=&rft.au=&rft.aulast=&rft.aufirst=&rft.date=2002-06-14&rft.volume=&rft.issue=&rft.spage=&rft.isbn=&rft.btitle=AMERICAN+RIVER+PUMP+STATION+PROJECT%2C+PLACER+COUNTY%2C+CALIFORNIA.&rft.title=AMERICAN+RIVER+PUMP+STATION+PROJECT%2C+PLACER+COUNTY%2C+CALIFORNIA.&rft.issn=&rft_id=info:doi/ LA - English DB - ProQuest Environmental Science Collection N1 - Name - Department of the Interior, Bureau of Reclamation, Sacramento, California; DOI N1 - Date revised - 2006-05-01 N1 - SuppNotes - Final. Preparation date: June 14, 2002 N1 - Last updated - 2011-12-16 ER - TY - RPRT T1 - CITY OF ALBUQUERQUE DRINKING WATER PROJECT, ALBUQUERQUE, NEW MEXICO. AN - 36438297; 9351 AB - PURPOSE: The implementation of a drinking water project for the residents of the city of Albuquerque, New Mexico is proposed. The project's region of influence includes portions of the Rio Grande watershed from the outlet works of the Heron Reservoir on the Rio Chama downstream to the headwaters of Elephant Butte Reservoir on the Rio Grande. The project, known as the City's Drinking Water Project, would involve the diversion of surface water from the Rio Grande; transportation of the diverted raw water to a new water treatment plant; treatment of the raw water to meet drinking water standards; and distribution of the treated, potable water to customers in the city's water service area. The project would require the issuance of a license by the Bureau of Reclamation (BLM) to the city for the location of project facilities on BLM-administered lands or rights-of-way, or approval of a license between the city and the Middle Rio Grande Conservancy District for the location of facilities on a rights-of-way held by the BLM over property owned by the district; possible execution of a water carriage contract authorizing use of federal irrigation canals to convey non-project water; and issuance of a Section 404 Permit under the Federal Water Pollution Control Act of 1972. The project would use the city's 48,200 acre-feet annual allocation of waters; after transit losses, the amount available for full use would amount to 47,000 acre-feet. After the city's water was fully consumed, the native Rio Grande water, about half of the 94,000 acre-feet per year, would be returned to the Rio Grande following treatment at the city's Southside Water Reclamation Plant. Four alternatives, including a No Action Alternative, are considered in this draft EIS. Each of the action alternatives would provide a means by which the city could cully consumptively use the city's San Juan-Chama project water to provide a sustainable water supply. The preferred alternative (Paseo del Norte Diversion Alternative) would provide for a surface diversion dam in the Albuquerque reach of the Rio Grande, approximately 0.7 mile north of Paseo del Norte. Gates on the east side of the dam would route water to an inlet structure, from which a pump station would pump water into a pipeline for conveyance to the Chappell Drive Water Treatment Plant. The dam would incorporate fish screen and fishway facilities. POSITIVE IMPACTS: The project would provide a sustainable water supply for the city through direct and full consumptive use of City San Juan-Chama water for potable purposes in accordance with federal safe drinking water regulations. The new system would eliminate the current depletion of the groundwater aquifer, preventing continued land subsidence and deterioration of groundwater quality. Surface water quality would also improve due to agreed upon releases from the diversion structure. NEGATIVE IMPACTS: The preferred alternative would require construction of a surface diversion in-river and a pump station with bosque habitat. Approximately 14.7 acres of riparian areas would be affected. Another 2.4 acres of riparian area would be temporarily affected due to pipeline construction activities. The habitat of three federally protected species, including fish and bird species, could be affected by project operations. LEGAL MANDATES: Federal Water Pollution Control Act of 1972 (33 U.S.C. 1251 et seq.) and Safe Drinking Water Act of 1974 (P.L. 99-339). JF - EPA number: 020236, Summary--19 pages, Draft EIS--398 pages and maps, Appendices--276 pages and maps, June 13, 2002 PY - 2002 KW - Water KW - Agency number: DES-02-03 KW - Biologic Assessments KW - Canals KW - Cultural Resources Surveys KW - Dams KW - Diversion Structures KW - Endangered Species (Animals) KW - Fish KW - Hydrologic Assessments KW - Irrigation KW - Pipelines KW - Subsidence KW - Water (Potable) KW - Water Quality KW - Water Supply KW - Water Treatment KW - Wetlands KW - Wildlife Surveys KW - New Mexico KW - Rio Grande KW - Federal Water Pollution Control Act of 1972, Section 404 Permits KW - Safe Drinking Water Act of 1974, Compliance UR - http://libproxy.lib.unc.edu/login?url=http://search.proquest.com/docview/36438297?accountid=14244 L2 - http://vb3lk7eb4t.search.serialssolutions.com/?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&rfr_id=info:sid/Environmental+Impact+Statements%3A+Digests&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=report&rft.jtitle=&rft.atitle=&rft.au=&rft.aulast=&rft.aufirst=&rft.date=2001-01-01&rft.volume=&rft.issue=&rft.spage=28&rft.isbn=&rft.btitle=Geology%2C+Hydrology%2C+and+Water+Quality+in+the+Vicinity+of+Brownfield+Redevelopment+Site+in+East+Moline%2C+Illinois&rft.title=Geology%2C+Hydrology%2C+and+Water+Quality+in+the+Vicinity+of+Brownfield+Redevelopment+Site+in+East+Moline%2C+Illinois&rft.issn=&rft_id=info:doi/ LA - English DB - ProQuest Environmental Science Collection N1 - Name - Department of the Interior, Bureau of Reclamation, Albuquerque, New Mexico; DOI N1 - Date revised - 2006-05-01 N1 - SuppNotes - Draft. Preparation date: June 13, 2002 N1 - Last updated - 2011-12-16 ER - TY - RPRT T1 - CITY OF ALBUQUERQUE DRINKING WATER PROJECT, ALBUQUERQUE, NEW MEXICO. [Part 1 of 3] T2 - CITY OF ALBUQUERQUE DRINKING WATER PROJECT, ALBUQUERQUE, NEW MEXICO. AN - 36384083; 9351-020236_0001 AB - PURPOSE: The implementation of a drinking water project for the residents of the city of Albuquerque, New Mexico is proposed. The project's region of influence includes portions of the Rio Grande watershed from the outlet works of the Heron Reservoir on the Rio Chama downstream to the headwaters of Elephant Butte Reservoir on the Rio Grande. The project, known as the City's Drinking Water Project, would involve the diversion of surface water from the Rio Grande; transportation of the diverted raw water to a new water treatment plant; treatment of the raw water to meet drinking water standards; and distribution of the treated, potable water to customers in the city's water service area. The project would require the issuance of a license by the Bureau of Reclamation (BLM) to the city for the location of project facilities on BLM-administered lands or rights-of-way, or approval of a license between the city and the Middle Rio Grande Conservancy District for the location of facilities on a rights-of-way held by the BLM over property owned by the district; possible execution of a water carriage contract authorizing use of federal irrigation canals to convey non-project water; and issuance of a Section 404 Permit under the Federal Water Pollution Control Act of 1972. The project would use the city's 48,200 acre-feet annual allocation of waters; after transit losses, the amount available for full use would amount to 47,000 acre-feet. After the city's water was fully consumed, the native Rio Grande water, about half of the 94,000 acre-feet per year, would be returned to the Rio Grande following treatment at the city's Southside Water Reclamation Plant. Four alternatives, including a No Action Alternative, are considered in this draft EIS. Each of the action alternatives would provide a means by which the city could cully consumptively use the city's San Juan-Chama project water to provide a sustainable water supply. The preferred alternative (Paseo del Norte Diversion Alternative) would provide for a surface diversion dam in the Albuquerque reach of the Rio Grande, approximately 0.7 mile north of Paseo del Norte. Gates on the east side of the dam would route water to an inlet structure, from which a pump station would pump water into a pipeline for conveyance to the Chappell Drive Water Treatment Plant. The dam would incorporate fish screen and fishway facilities. POSITIVE IMPACTS: The project would provide a sustainable water supply for the city through direct and full consumptive use of City San Juan-Chama water for potable purposes in accordance with federal safe drinking water regulations. The new system would eliminate the current depletion of the groundwater aquifer, preventing continued land subsidence and deterioration of groundwater quality. Surface water quality would also improve due to agreed upon releases from the diversion structure. NEGATIVE IMPACTS: The preferred alternative would require construction of a surface diversion in-river and a pump station with bosque habitat. Approximately 14.7 acres of riparian areas would be affected. Another 2.4 acres of riparian area would be temporarily affected due to pipeline construction activities. The habitat of three federally protected species, including fish and bird species, could be affected by project operations. LEGAL MANDATES: Federal Water Pollution Control Act of 1972 (33 U.S.C. 1251 et seq.) and Safe Drinking Water Act of 1974 (P.L. 99-339). JF - EPA number: 020236, Summary--19 pages, Draft EIS--398 pages and maps, Appendices--276 pages and maps, June 13, 2002 PY - 2002 VL - 1 KW - Water KW - Agency number: DES-02-03 KW - Biologic Assessments KW - Canals KW - Cultural Resources Surveys KW - Dams KW - Diversion Structures KW - Endangered Species (Animals) KW - Fish KW - Hydrologic Assessments KW - Irrigation KW - Pipelines KW - Subsidence KW - Water (Potable) KW - Water Quality KW - Water Supply KW - Water Treatment KW - Wetlands KW - Wildlife Surveys KW - New Mexico KW - Rio Grande KW - Federal Water Pollution Control Act of 1972, Section 404 Permits KW - Safe Drinking Water Act of 1974, Compliance UR - http://libproxy.lib.unc.edu/login?url=http://search.proquest.com/docview/36384083?accountid=14244 L2 - http://vb3lk7eb4t.search.serialssolutions.com/?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&rfr_id=info:sid/Environmental+Impact+Statements%3A+Full+Text&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=report&rft.jtitle=&rft.atitle=&rft.au=&rft.aulast=&rft.aufirst=&rft.date=2002-06-13&rft.volume=&rft.issue=&rft.spage=&rft.isbn=&rft.btitle=CITY+OF+ALBUQUERQUE+DRINKING+WATER+PROJECT%2C+ALBUQUERQUE%2C+NEW+MEXICO.&rft.title=CITY+OF+ALBUQUERQUE+DRINKING+WATER+PROJECT%2C+ALBUQUERQUE%2C+NEW+MEXICO.&rft.issn=&rft_id=info:doi/ LA - English DB - ProQuest Environmental Science Collection N1 - Name - Department of the Interior, Bureau of Reclamation, Albuquerque, New Mexico; DOI N1 - Date revised - 2006-05-01 N1 - SuppNotes - Draft. Preparation date: June 13, 2002 N1 - Last updated - 2011-12-16 ER - TY - RPRT T1 - CITY OF ALBUQUERQUE DRINKING WATER PROJECT, ALBUQUERQUE, NEW MEXICO. [Part 3 of 3] T2 - CITY OF ALBUQUERQUE DRINKING WATER PROJECT, ALBUQUERQUE, NEW MEXICO. AN - 36379545; 9351-020236_0003 AB - PURPOSE: The implementation of a drinking water project for the residents of the city of Albuquerque, New Mexico is proposed. The project's region of influence includes portions of the Rio Grande watershed from the outlet works of the Heron Reservoir on the Rio Chama downstream to the headwaters of Elephant Butte Reservoir on the Rio Grande. The project, known as the City's Drinking Water Project, would involve the diversion of surface water from the Rio Grande; transportation of the diverted raw water to a new water treatment plant; treatment of the raw water to meet drinking water standards; and distribution of the treated, potable water to customers in the city's water service area. The project would require the issuance of a license by the Bureau of Reclamation (BLM) to the city for the location of project facilities on BLM-administered lands or rights-of-way, or approval of a license between the city and the Middle Rio Grande Conservancy District for the location of facilities on a rights-of-way held by the BLM over property owned by the district; possible execution of a water carriage contract authorizing use of federal irrigation canals to convey non-project water; and issuance of a Section 404 Permit under the Federal Water Pollution Control Act of 1972. The project would use the city's 48,200 acre-feet annual allocation of waters; after transit losses, the amount available for full use would amount to 47,000 acre-feet. After the city's water was fully consumed, the native Rio Grande water, about half of the 94,000 acre-feet per year, would be returned to the Rio Grande following treatment at the city's Southside Water Reclamation Plant. Four alternatives, including a No Action Alternative, are considered in this draft EIS. Each of the action alternatives would provide a means by which the city could cully consumptively use the city's San Juan-Chama project water to provide a sustainable water supply. The preferred alternative (Paseo del Norte Diversion Alternative) would provide for a surface diversion dam in the Albuquerque reach of the Rio Grande, approximately 0.7 mile north of Paseo del Norte. Gates on the east side of the dam would route water to an inlet structure, from which a pump station would pump water into a pipeline for conveyance to the Chappell Drive Water Treatment Plant. The dam would incorporate fish screen and fishway facilities. POSITIVE IMPACTS: The project would provide a sustainable water supply for the city through direct and full consumptive use of City San Juan-Chama water for potable purposes in accordance with federal safe drinking water regulations. The new system would eliminate the current depletion of the groundwater aquifer, preventing continued land subsidence and deterioration of groundwater quality. Surface water quality would also improve due to agreed upon releases from the diversion structure. NEGATIVE IMPACTS: The preferred alternative would require construction of a surface diversion in-river and a pump station with bosque habitat. Approximately 14.7 acres of riparian areas would be affected. Another 2.4 acres of riparian area would be temporarily affected due to pipeline construction activities. The habitat of three federally protected species, including fish and bird species, could be affected by project operations. LEGAL MANDATES: Federal Water Pollution Control Act of 1972 (33 U.S.C. 1251 et seq.) and Safe Drinking Water Act of 1974 (P.L. 99-339). JF - EPA number: 020236, Summary--19 pages, Draft EIS--398 pages and maps, Appendices--276 pages and maps, June 13, 2002 PY - 2002 VL - 3 KW - Water KW - Agency number: DES-02-03 KW - Biologic Assessments KW - Canals KW - Cultural Resources Surveys KW - Dams KW - Diversion Structures KW - Endangered Species (Animals) KW - Fish KW - Hydrologic Assessments KW - Irrigation KW - Pipelines KW - Subsidence KW - Water (Potable) KW - Water Quality KW - Water Supply KW - Water Treatment KW - Wetlands KW - Wildlife Surveys KW - New Mexico KW - Rio Grande KW - Federal Water Pollution Control Act of 1972, Section 404 Permits KW - Safe Drinking Water Act of 1974, Compliance UR - http://libproxy.lib.unc.edu/login?url=http://search.proquest.com/docview/36379545?accountid=14244 L2 - http://vb3lk7eb4t.search.serialssolutions.com/?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&rfr_id=info:sid/Environmental+Impact+Statements%3A+Full+Text&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=report&rft.jtitle=&rft.atitle=&rft.au=&rft.aulast=&rft.aufirst=&rft.date=2002-06-13&rft.volume=&rft.issue=&rft.spage=&rft.isbn=&rft.btitle=CITY+OF+ALBUQUERQUE+DRINKING+WATER+PROJECT%2C+ALBUQUERQUE%2C+NEW+MEXICO.&rft.title=CITY+OF+ALBUQUERQUE+DRINKING+WATER+PROJECT%2C+ALBUQUERQUE%2C+NEW+MEXICO.&rft.issn=&rft_id=info:doi/ LA - English DB - ProQuest Environmental Science Collection N1 - Name - Department of the Interior, Bureau of Reclamation, Albuquerque, New Mexico; DOI N1 - Date revised - 2006-05-01 N1 - SuppNotes - Draft. Preparation date: June 13, 2002 N1 - Last updated - 2011-12-16 ER - TY - RPRT T1 - CITY OF ALBUQUERQUE DRINKING WATER PROJECT, ALBUQUERQUE, NEW MEXICO. [Part 2 of 3] T2 - CITY OF ALBUQUERQUE DRINKING WATER PROJECT, ALBUQUERQUE, NEW MEXICO. AN - 36378549; 9351-020236_0002 AB - PURPOSE: The implementation of a drinking water project for the residents of the city of Albuquerque, New Mexico is proposed. The project's region of influence includes portions of the Rio Grande watershed from the outlet works of the Heron Reservoir on the Rio Chama downstream to the headwaters of Elephant Butte Reservoir on the Rio Grande. The project, known as the City's Drinking Water Project, would involve the diversion of surface water from the Rio Grande; transportation of the diverted raw water to a new water treatment plant; treatment of the raw water to meet drinking water standards; and distribution of the treated, potable water to customers in the city's water service area. The project would require the issuance of a license by the Bureau of Reclamation (BLM) to the city for the location of project facilities on BLM-administered lands or rights-of-way, or approval of a license between the city and the Middle Rio Grande Conservancy District for the location of facilities on a rights-of-way held by the BLM over property owned by the district; possible execution of a water carriage contract authorizing use of federal irrigation canals to convey non-project water; and issuance of a Section 404 Permit under the Federal Water Pollution Control Act of 1972. The project would use the city's 48,200 acre-feet annual allocation of waters; after transit losses, the amount available for full use would amount to 47,000 acre-feet. After the city's water was fully consumed, the native Rio Grande water, about half of the 94,000 acre-feet per year, would be returned to the Rio Grande following treatment at the city's Southside Water Reclamation Plant. Four alternatives, including a No Action Alternative, are considered in this draft EIS. Each of the action alternatives would provide a means by which the city could cully consumptively use the city's San Juan-Chama project water to provide a sustainable water supply. The preferred alternative (Paseo del Norte Diversion Alternative) would provide for a surface diversion dam in the Albuquerque reach of the Rio Grande, approximately 0.7 mile north of Paseo del Norte. Gates on the east side of the dam would route water to an inlet structure, from which a pump station would pump water into a pipeline for conveyance to the Chappell Drive Water Treatment Plant. The dam would incorporate fish screen and fishway facilities. POSITIVE IMPACTS: The project would provide a sustainable water supply for the city through direct and full consumptive use of City San Juan-Chama water for potable purposes in accordance with federal safe drinking water regulations. The new system would eliminate the current depletion of the groundwater aquifer, preventing continued land subsidence and deterioration of groundwater quality. Surface water quality would also improve due to agreed upon releases from the diversion structure. NEGATIVE IMPACTS: The preferred alternative would require construction of a surface diversion in-river and a pump station with bosque habitat. Approximately 14.7 acres of riparian areas would be affected. Another 2.4 acres of riparian area would be temporarily affected due to pipeline construction activities. The habitat of three federally protected species, including fish and bird species, could be affected by project operations. LEGAL MANDATES: Federal Water Pollution Control Act of 1972 (33 U.S.C. 1251 et seq.) and Safe Drinking Water Act of 1974 (P.L. 99-339). JF - EPA number: 020236, Summary--19 pages, Draft EIS--398 pages and maps, Appendices--276 pages and maps, June 13, 2002 PY - 2002 VL - 2 KW - Water KW - Agency number: DES-02-03 KW - Biologic Assessments KW - Canals KW - Cultural Resources Surveys KW - Dams KW - Diversion Structures KW - Endangered Species (Animals) KW - Fish KW - Hydrologic Assessments KW - Irrigation KW - Pipelines KW - Subsidence KW - Water (Potable) KW - Water Quality KW - Water Supply KW - Water Treatment KW - Wetlands KW - Wildlife Surveys KW - New Mexico KW - Rio Grande KW - Federal Water Pollution Control Act of 1972, Section 404 Permits KW - Safe Drinking Water Act of 1974, Compliance UR - http://libproxy.lib.unc.edu/login?url=http://search.proquest.com/docview/36378549?accountid=14244 L2 - http://vb3lk7eb4t.search.serialssolutions.com/?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&rfr_id=info:sid/Environmental+Impact+Statements%3A+Full+Text&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=report&rft.jtitle=&rft.atitle=&rft.au=&rft.aulast=&rft.aufirst=&rft.date=2001-01-01&rft.volume=&rft.issue=&rft.spage=26&rft.isbn=&rft.btitle=Measurement+of+delta%28sup+13%29C+and+delta%28sup+18%29O+Isotopic+Ratios+of+CaCO%28sub+3%29+using+a+Thermoquest+Finnigan+GasBench+II+Delta+Plus+XL+Continuous+Flow+Isotope+Ratio+Mass+Spectrometer+with+Application+to+Devils+Hole+Core+DH-11+Calcite&rft.title=Measurement+of+delta%28sup+13%29C+and+delta%28sup+18%29O+Isotopic+Ratios+of+CaCO%28sub+3%29+using+a+Thermoquest+Finnigan+GasBench+II+Delta+Plus+XL+Continuous+Flow+Isotope+Ratio+Mass+Spectrometer+with+Application+to+Devils+Hole+Core+DH-11+Calcite&rft.issn=&rft_id=info:doi/ LA - English DB - ProQuest Environmental Science Collection N1 - Name - Department of the Interior, Bureau of Reclamation, Albuquerque, New Mexico; DOI N1 - Date revised - 2006-05-01 N1 - SuppNotes - Draft. Preparation date: June 13, 2002 N1 - Last updated - 2011-12-16 ER - TY - RPRT T1 - CASCADE-SISKIYOU NATIONAL MONUMENT RESOURCE MANAGEMENT PLAN, JACKSON COUNTY, OREGON. AN - 36436440; 9352 AB - PURPOSE: The implementation of a general management plan for the 52,947-acre Cascade-Siskyou National Monument in southeastern Jackson County, Oregon is proposed. The monument was established on June 9, 2000 to protect an array of biological, geological, hydrological, archaeological, and historical resources. Key issues identified during scoping include those associated with plant community health, access and transportation services, hiking and other forms of non-mechanized recreation, visitor use in general, special forest products, mechanized recreation, recreational animal stock use, and facilities and rights-of-way. Four alternatives, including a No Action Alternative (Alternative A), which would perpetuate the current management regime, are considered in this draft EIS. The preferred alternative (Alternative C) would incorporate active management for the protection and maintenance of the conifer communities while limiting some ground-disturbing management tools that could be used in maintaining and restoring other plant communities. Recreation and other visitor uses would be accommodated at levels that would not interfere with protection, maintenance, and/or restoration of monument objects and resources. The transportation system would be managed to accommodate visitor use and safety while closing and decommissioning roads (both mechanical and natural) in order to protect monument resources. In addition to the key issues, all alternatives would address issues related to aquatic habitat, the Soda Mountain Wilderness Study Area, wildfire suppression activities, special use activities, snags and coarse woody debris habitat, other fish and wildlife habitat issues of concern to the state authorities, the Pacific Crest National Scenic Trail, special status plants and animals, noxious weed control, air quality, archaeological sites, the Hyatt Lake Recreation Complex, visual resources, and off-highway vehicle use. Livestock grazing issues will be addressed at a later date under the appropriate regulatory authority. POSITIVE IMPACTS: The management plan would protect the monument's unique resources, while allowing for sustained use of its economically and culturally valuable resources. Fuel reduction measures, including prescribed fire, would reduce the risk of wildfire within the monument. NEGATIVE IMPACTS: Road closures and restrictions on off-highway vehicles would affect recreational access to certain areas within the monument. Mechanical vegetation management would result in moderate disturbance of native plant communities. Management activities would also result in soil disturbance and sedimentation of receiving waters in the short-term. Fuel reduction measures could affect canopy cover in some areas in the short-term. LEGAL MANDATES: Antiquities Act of 1906 (61 U.S.C. 431 et seq.). JF - EPA number: 020237, Draft EIS--354 pages, Maps and Appendices--492 pages, June 10, 2002 PY - 2002 KW - Parks, Refuges and Forests KW - Agency number: BLM/OR/WA/PL-01/017+1792 KW - Air Quality KW - Archaeological Sites KW - Burning (Prescribed) KW - Economic Assessments KW - Endangered Species (Animals) KW - Endangered Species (Plants) KW - Fire Prevention KW - Forests KW - Geologic Sites KW - Grazing KW - Historic Sites KW - Hydrology KW - Impact Monitoring Plans KW - Lakes KW - Land Management KW - Livestock KW - Motor Vehicles KW - Plant Control KW - Recreation Facilities KW - Recreation Resources KW - Recreation Resources Management KW - Recreation Resources Surveys KW - Roads KW - Socioeconomic Assessments KW - Soils Surveys KW - Timber KW - Timber Management KW - Trails KW - Transportation KW - Vegetation KW - Vegetation Surveys KW - Visual Resources KW - Visual Resources Management KW - Visual Resources Surveys KW - Wilderness Management KW - Wildlife Surveys KW - Cascade-Siskiyou National Monument KW - Oregon KW - Antiquities Act of 1906, Compliance UR - http://libproxy.lib.unc.edu/login?url=http://search.proquest.com/docview/36436440?accountid=14244 L2 - http://vb3lk7eb4t.search.serialssolutions.com/?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&rfr_id=info:sid/Environmental+Impact+Statements%3A+Digests&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=report&rft.jtitle=&rft.atitle=&rft.au=&rft.aulast=&rft.aufirst=&rft.date=2002-06-10&rft.volume=&rft.issue=&rft.spage=&rft.isbn=&rft.btitle=CASCADE-SISKIYOU+NATIONAL+MONUMENT+RESOURCE+MANAGEMENT+PLAN%2C+JACKSON+COUNTY%2C+OREGON.&rft.title=CASCADE-SISKIYOU+NATIONAL+MONUMENT+RESOURCE+MANAGEMENT+PLAN%2C+JACKSON+COUNTY%2C+OREGON.&rft.issn=&rft_id=info:doi/ LA - English DB - ProQuest Environmental Science Collection N1 - Name - Department of the Interior, Bureau of Land Management, Medford, Oregon; DOI N1 - Date revised - 2006-05-01 N1 - SuppNotes - Draft. Preparation date: June 10, 2002 N1 - Last updated - 2011-12-16 ER - TY - RPRT T1 - ELEPHANT BUTTE AND CABALLO RESERVOIRS RESOURCE MANAGEMENT PLAN, SIERRA AND SOCORRO COUNTIES, NEW MEXICO. AN - 36422329; 9350 AB - PURPOSE: The implementation of a resource management plan (RMP) for lands administered by the Bureau of Reclamation (BLM) at the Elephant Butte and Caballo Reservoirs Project Area, Sierra and Socorro counties, New Mexico is proposed. The reservoirs constitute major components of the Rio Grande Project in south-central New Mexico. In recent years, portions of the project area have experienced a sharp increase in recreation-oriented visitation and adjacent private land development that has increased demands on project area recreational and natural resources. The RMP would provide a conceptual framework for the conservation, protection, development, use, enhancement, and management of resources within the area. Four alternatives, including the No-Action Alternative (Alternative A), are considered in this final EIS. The preferred alternative (Alternative C), which emphasizes multi-purpose use of the area, would involve expansion of developed recreation areas, improvement of primitive recreation areas, and designation of wildlife management areas. New facilities and roads would be developed, including facilities for boating, camping picnicking, hiking, and biking. Existing recreational facilities would be maintained. Facilities that improve or protect the environment would also be included, as well as regulation and information systems to provide for public education. Cooperative land use agreements with jurisdictions managing surrounding lands would be pursued. One to several Lease Lot Areas could be privatized. Other Lease Lot Areas would be phased out over the long-term according the BLM policy allowing for the amortization of personal property investments. Lease holders not included in the proposed privatization would be offered the opportunity to relocate to an area designated for privatization. Grazing could be limited, reduced, increased, or maintained based on the capability of the resources to sustain grazing. POSITIVE IMPACTS: The potential for injury of recreationists would be reduced, and damage to personal property would decline. Grazing would be regulated in a more effective manner through development of an allotment-specific grazing management plan. Concentrations of pollutants in reservoir and downstream waters would decline somewhat. The number of Lease Lot Areas contributing effluents would decline significantly. The functional capacities of riparian wetland would be enhanced, as would the quality of wildlife habitat in general. Fishery habitat, reproduction and recruitment indices, and the general fishing experience would be enhanced. Thirteen archaeological sites would benefit from RMP activities. NEGATIVE IMPACTS: Rate of shoreline retreat along the reservoirs would be primarily depended on fluctuating water levels. Reservoir sedimentation would continue at the current rate. The potential for ground disturbance would increase. RMP activities would damage 156 archaeological sites. The fiscal condition of local communities would decline somewhat. The extent of primitive recreation areas would decline. LEGAL MANDATES: Reclamation Recreation Management Act of 1992 (43 U.S.C. 391), Reclamation Recreation Management Act of 1992 (P.L. 102-575), Rio Grande Reclamation Project Act of 1905 (33 Stat. 814), and Reclamation Development Act of 1974 (88 Stat. 1498). PRIOR REFERENCES: For the abstract of the draft EIS, see 99-0372D, Volume 23, Number 4. JF - EPA number: 020235, Final EIS--421 pages and maps, Comments and Responses, 401 pages, June 10, 2002 PY - 2002 KW - Parks, Refuges and Forests KW - Agency number: DEC 99-37 KW - Archaeological Sites KW - Conservation KW - Erosion KW - Fish KW - Grazing KW - Livestock KW - Range Management KW - Recreation Facilities KW - Recreation Resources KW - Recreation Resources Management KW - Reservoirs KW - Roads KW - Safety KW - Sediment KW - Shores KW - Trails KW - Water Quality KW - Wildlife Habitat KW - Caballo Reservoir KW - Elephant Butte Reservoir KW - New Mexico KW - Rio Grande KW - Reclamation Act of 1902, Compliance KW - Reclamation Recreation Management Act of 1992, Compliance KW - Rio Grande Reclamation Project Act of 1905, Compliance KW - Reclamation Development Act of 1974, Compliance UR - http://libproxy.lib.unc.edu/login?url=http://search.proquest.com/docview/36422329?accountid=14244 L2 - http://vb3lk7eb4t.search.serialssolutions.com/?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&rfr_id=info:sid/Environmental+Impact+Statements%3A+Digests&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=report&rft.jtitle=&rft.atitle=&rft.au=Major%2C+J+J%3BSchilling%2C+S+P%3BPullinger%2C+C+R%3BEscobar%2C+C+D%3BHowell%2C+M+M&rft.aulast=Major&rft.aufirst=J&rft.date=2001-01-01&rft.volume=&rft.issue=&rft.spage=26&rft.isbn=&rft.btitle=Volcano-Hazard+Zonation+for+San+Vicente+Volcano%2C+El+Salvador&rft.title=Volcano-Hazard+Zonation+for+San+Vicente+Volcano%2C+El+Salvador&rft.issn=&rft_id=info:doi/ LA - English DB - ProQuest Environmental Science Collection N1 - Name - Department of the Interior, Bureau of Reclamation, Albuquerque, New Mexico; DOI N1 - Date revised - 2006-05-01 N1 - SuppNotes - Final. Preparation date: June 10, 2002 N1 - Last updated - 2011-12-16 ER - TY - RPRT T1 - CASCADE-SISKIYOU NATIONAL MONUMENT RESOURCE MANAGEMENT PLAN, JACKSON COUNTY, OREGON. [Part 1 of 2] T2 - CASCADE-SISKIYOU NATIONAL MONUMENT RESOURCE MANAGEMENT PLAN, JACKSON COUNTY, OREGON. AN - 36380188; 9352-020237_0001 AB - PURPOSE: The implementation of a general management plan for the 52,947-acre Cascade-Siskyou National Monument in southeastern Jackson County, Oregon is proposed. The monument was established on June 9, 2000 to protect an array of biological, geological, hydrological, archaeological, and historical resources. Key issues identified during scoping include those associated with plant community health, access and transportation services, hiking and other forms of non-mechanized recreation, visitor use in general, special forest products, mechanized recreation, recreational animal stock use, and facilities and rights-of-way. Four alternatives, including a No Action Alternative (Alternative A), which would perpetuate the current management regime, are considered in this draft EIS. The preferred alternative (Alternative C) would incorporate active management for the protection and maintenance of the conifer communities while limiting some ground-disturbing management tools that could be used in maintaining and restoring other plant communities. Recreation and other visitor uses would be accommodated at levels that would not interfere with protection, maintenance, and/or restoration of monument objects and resources. The transportation system would be managed to accommodate visitor use and safety while closing and decommissioning roads (both mechanical and natural) in order to protect monument resources. In addition to the key issues, all alternatives would address issues related to aquatic habitat, the Soda Mountain Wilderness Study Area, wildfire suppression activities, special use activities, snags and coarse woody debris habitat, other fish and wildlife habitat issues of concern to the state authorities, the Pacific Crest National Scenic Trail, special status plants and animals, noxious weed control, air quality, archaeological sites, the Hyatt Lake Recreation Complex, visual resources, and off-highway vehicle use. Livestock grazing issues will be addressed at a later date under the appropriate regulatory authority. POSITIVE IMPACTS: The management plan would protect the monument's unique resources, while allowing for sustained use of its economically and culturally valuable resources. Fuel reduction measures, including prescribed fire, would reduce the risk of wildfire within the monument. NEGATIVE IMPACTS: Road closures and restrictions on off-highway vehicles would affect recreational access to certain areas within the monument. Mechanical vegetation management would result in moderate disturbance of native plant communities. Management activities would also result in soil disturbance and sedimentation of receiving waters in the short-term. Fuel reduction measures could affect canopy cover in some areas in the short-term. LEGAL MANDATES: Antiquities Act of 1906 (61 U.S.C. 431 et seq.). JF - EPA number: 020237, Draft EIS--354 pages, Maps and Appendices--492 pages, June 10, 2002 PY - 2002 VL - 1 KW - Parks, Refuges and Forests KW - Agency number: BLM/OR/WA/PL-01/017+1792 KW - Air Quality KW - Archaeological Sites KW - Burning (Prescribed) KW - Economic Assessments KW - Endangered Species (Animals) KW - Endangered Species (Plants) KW - Fire Prevention KW - Forests KW - Geologic Sites KW - Grazing KW - Historic Sites KW - Hydrology KW - Impact Monitoring Plans KW - Lakes KW - Land Management KW - Livestock KW - Motor Vehicles KW - Plant Control KW - Recreation Facilities KW - Recreation Resources KW - Recreation Resources Management KW - Recreation Resources Surveys KW - Roads KW - Socioeconomic Assessments KW - Soils Surveys KW - Timber KW - Timber Management KW - Trails KW - Transportation KW - Vegetation KW - Vegetation Surveys KW - Visual Resources KW - Visual Resources Management KW - Visual Resources Surveys KW - Wilderness Management KW - Wildlife Surveys KW - Cascade-Siskiyou National Monument KW - Oregon KW - Antiquities Act of 1906, Compliance UR - http://libproxy.lib.unc.edu/login?url=http://search.proquest.com/docview/36380188?accountid=14244 L2 - http://vb3lk7eb4t.search.serialssolutions.com/?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&rfr_id=info:sid/Environmental+Impact+Statements%3A+Full+Text&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=report&rft.jtitle=&rft.atitle=&rft.au=&rft.aulast=&rft.aufirst=&rft.date=2002-06-10&rft.volume=&rft.issue=&rft.spage=&rft.isbn=&rft.btitle=CASCADE-SISKIYOU+NATIONAL+MONUMENT+RESOURCE+MANAGEMENT+PLAN%2C+JACKSON+COUNTY%2C+OREGON.&rft.title=CASCADE-SISKIYOU+NATIONAL+MONUMENT+RESOURCE+MANAGEMENT+PLAN%2C+JACKSON+COUNTY%2C+OREGON.&rft.issn=&rft_id=info:doi/ LA - English DB - ProQuest Environmental Science Collection N1 - Name - Department of the Interior, Bureau of Land Management, Medford, Oregon; DOI N1 - Date revised - 2006-05-01 N1 - SuppNotes - Draft. Preparation date: June 10, 2002 N1 - Last updated - 2011-12-16 ER - TY - RPRT T1 - CASCADE-SISKIYOU NATIONAL MONUMENT RESOURCE MANAGEMENT PLAN, JACKSON COUNTY, OREGON. [Part 2 of 2] T2 - CASCADE-SISKIYOU NATIONAL MONUMENT RESOURCE MANAGEMENT PLAN, JACKSON COUNTY, OREGON. AN - 36379794; 9352-020237_0002 AB - PURPOSE: The implementation of a general management plan for the 52,947-acre Cascade-Siskyou National Monument in southeastern Jackson County, Oregon is proposed. The monument was established on June 9, 2000 to protect an array of biological, geological, hydrological, archaeological, and historical resources. Key issues identified during scoping include those associated with plant community health, access and transportation services, hiking and other forms of non-mechanized recreation, visitor use in general, special forest products, mechanized recreation, recreational animal stock use, and facilities and rights-of-way. Four alternatives, including a No Action Alternative (Alternative A), which would perpetuate the current management regime, are considered in this draft EIS. The preferred alternative (Alternative C) would incorporate active management for the protection and maintenance of the conifer communities while limiting some ground-disturbing management tools that could be used in maintaining and restoring other plant communities. Recreation and other visitor uses would be accommodated at levels that would not interfere with protection, maintenance, and/or restoration of monument objects and resources. The transportation system would be managed to accommodate visitor use and safety while closing and decommissioning roads (both mechanical and natural) in order to protect monument resources. In addition to the key issues, all alternatives would address issues related to aquatic habitat, the Soda Mountain Wilderness Study Area, wildfire suppression activities, special use activities, snags and coarse woody debris habitat, other fish and wildlife habitat issues of concern to the state authorities, the Pacific Crest National Scenic Trail, special status plants and animals, noxious weed control, air quality, archaeological sites, the Hyatt Lake Recreation Complex, visual resources, and off-highway vehicle use. Livestock grazing issues will be addressed at a later date under the appropriate regulatory authority. POSITIVE IMPACTS: The management plan would protect the monument's unique resources, while allowing for sustained use of its economically and culturally valuable resources. Fuel reduction measures, including prescribed fire, would reduce the risk of wildfire within the monument. NEGATIVE IMPACTS: Road closures and restrictions on off-highway vehicles would affect recreational access to certain areas within the monument. Mechanical vegetation management would result in moderate disturbance of native plant communities. Management activities would also result in soil disturbance and sedimentation of receiving waters in the short-term. Fuel reduction measures could affect canopy cover in some areas in the short-term. LEGAL MANDATES: Antiquities Act of 1906 (61 U.S.C. 431 et seq.). JF - EPA number: 020237, Draft EIS--354 pages, Maps and Appendices--492 pages, June 10, 2002 PY - 2002 VL - 2 KW - Parks, Refuges and Forests KW - Agency number: BLM/OR/WA/PL-01/017+1792 KW - Air Quality KW - Archaeological Sites KW - Burning (Prescribed) KW - Economic Assessments KW - Endangered Species (Animals) KW - Endangered Species (Plants) KW - Fire Prevention KW - Forests KW - Geologic Sites KW - Grazing KW - Historic Sites KW - Hydrology KW - Impact Monitoring Plans KW - Lakes KW - Land Management KW - Livestock KW - Motor Vehicles KW - Plant Control KW - Recreation Facilities KW - Recreation Resources KW - Recreation Resources Management KW - Recreation Resources Surveys KW - Roads KW - Socioeconomic Assessments KW - Soils Surveys KW - Timber KW - Timber Management KW - Trails KW - Transportation KW - Vegetation KW - Vegetation Surveys KW - Visual Resources KW - Visual Resources Management KW - Visual Resources Surveys KW - Wilderness Management KW - Wildlife Surveys KW - Cascade-Siskiyou National Monument KW - Oregon KW - Antiquities Act of 1906, Compliance UR - http://libproxy.lib.unc.edu/login?url=http://search.proquest.com/docview/36379794?accountid=14244 L2 - http://vb3lk7eb4t.search.serialssolutions.com/?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&rfr_id=info:sid/Environmental+Impact+Statements%3A+Full+Text&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=report&rft.jtitle=&rft.atitle=&rft.au=&rft.aulast=&rft.aufirst=&rft.date=2002-06-10&rft.volume=&rft.issue=&rft.spage=&rft.isbn=&rft.btitle=CASCADE-SISKIYOU+NATIONAL+MONUMENT+RESOURCE+MANAGEMENT+PLAN%2C+JACKSON+COUNTY%2C+OREGON.&rft.title=CASCADE-SISKIYOU+NATIONAL+MONUMENT+RESOURCE+MANAGEMENT+PLAN%2C+JACKSON+COUNTY%2C+OREGON.&rft.issn=&rft_id=info:doi/ LA - English DB - ProQuest Environmental Science Collection N1 - Name - Department of the Interior, Bureau of Land Management, Medford, Oregon; DOI N1 - Date revised - 2006-05-01 N1 - SuppNotes - Draft. Preparation date: June 10, 2002 N1 - Last updated - 2011-12-16 ER - TY - GEN T1 - The New Freshman Class: Fall 2001. Informational Memorandum. AN - 62288746; ED465319 AB - Data in this series of tables provide information about the freshman class entering the University of Wisconsin System in fall 2001. In fall 2001, 83% of new freshmen in the University of Wisconsin System were Wisconsin residents, and 55% were women. Students of color made up 9% of the class. Some 95% were conventional admissions, and 64% of the class scored about the national American College Testing Program assessment (ACT) average score of 21. Forty-seven percent of these freshmen were in the top quartile of their high school classes. One appendix contains the new freshman headcount by institution, and the other shows new freshmen by average high school percentile rank for each institution. Data on enrollment and student characteristics are presented in 16 tables and 2 figures. (SLD) Y1 - 2002/06// PY - 2002 DA - June 2002 SP - 14 PB - University of Wisconsin System, Office of Policy Analysis & Research, 1534 Van Hise Hall, 1220 Linden Dr., Madison, WI 53706. Tel: 608-262-6441. For full text: http://www.uwsa.edu/opar/. KW - University of Wisconsin KW - ERIC, Resources in Education (RIE) KW - College Freshmen KW - Student Characteristics KW - Enrollment KW - Higher Education KW - Tables (Data) UR - http://libproxy.lib.unc.edu/login?url=http://search.proquest.com/docview/62288746?accountid=14244 LA - English DB - ERIC N1 - Last updated - 2017-02-24 ER - TY - RPRT T1 - CALIFORNIA DESERT CONSERVATION AREA PLAN AMENDMENT FOR THE COACHELLA VALLEY AND THE SANTA ROSA AND SAN JACINTO MOUNTAINS TRAILS MANAGEMENT PLAN, RIVERSIDE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA. AN - 36410891; 9342 AB - PURPOSE: The amendment of the management plan for the Coachella Valley and the Santa Rosa and San Jacinto Mountains trails management plan within the California Desert Conservation Area of Riverside County, California is proposed. The planning area encompasses public lands administered by the Bureau of Land Management in the Coachella Valley of southern California. Four alternatives, including a No Action Alternative (Alternative D), are considered in this draft EIS. The alternatives address wild and scenic river and wilderness designations, visual resource management, land health standards, air quality management, multiple-use classifications, habitat conservation objectives, fire management, special area designations, land exchanges and sale criteria, land acquisition criteria, management of acquired and formerly withdrawn lands, communication sites and utility rights-of-way, sand and gravel mining, livestock grazing, wild horse and burro management, designation of areas for motorized access via off-highway vehicles, road access, special recreation management area management, recreational access facilities and camping facilities, big horn sheep peninsular range recovery strategies, trails and trail use, cross-country travel, limitations on the presence of dogs, organized group activities, recreational activities of other sorts, public outreach, and areas of critical environmental concern. POSITIVE IMPACTS: The plan would provide for multiple use and sustainable development of public lands, while making progress towards healthy, properly functioning ecosystems. As well as, provide for the recovery of federal and state listed threatened and endangered species; avoid future listings of sensitive species; provide recreational opportunities on public lands in the area; and allow collaboration with local jurisdictions to facilitate land management consistency, management effectiveness, and cost-efficiency across jurisdictional boundaries. NEGATIVE IMPACTS: Land use restrictions would place economic hardships on some local users. Recreational access and other recreational use restrictions would pose problems for some visitors to the affected areas. Management activities and commercial and recreational uses of the area would disturb soil and vegetation and the associated wildlife habitat and could result in damage to cultural resource sites. LEGAL MANDATES: Federal Land Policy and Management Act of 1976 (43 U.S.C. 1701 et seq.). JF - EPA number: 020227, 521 pages, May 31, 2002 PY - 2002 KW - Parks, Refuges and Forests KW - Agency number: BLM/CA/ES-2002/003+1790-1600 KW - Air Quality KW - Air Quality Assessments KW - Communication Systems KW - Conservation KW - Cultural Resources KW - Desert Land KW - Endangered Species (Animals) KW - Gravel KW - Land Acquisitions KW - Land Management KW - Mineral Resources Management KW - Mining KW - Motor Vehicles KW - Property Disposition KW - Recreation Facilities KW - Recreation Resources KW - Recreation Resources Management KW - Recreation Resources Surveys KW - Roads KW - Sand KW - Trails KW - Transportation KW - Visual Resources Management KW - Wild and Scenic Rivers KW - Wilderness Management KW - Wildlife Habitat KW - Wildlife Management KW - California KW - California Desert Conservation Area KW - Federal Land Policy and Management Act of 1976, Compliance UR - http://libproxy.lib.unc.edu/login?url=http://search.proquest.com/docview/36410891?accountid=14244 L2 - http://vb3lk7eb4t.search.serialssolutions.com/?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&rfr_id=info:sid/Environmental+Impact+Statements%3A+Digests&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=report&rft.jtitle=&rft.atitle=&rft.au=Brightbill%2C+R+A%3BBilger%2C+MD&rft.aulast=Brightbill&rft.aufirst=R&rft.date=2001-01-01&rft.volume=&rft.issue=&rft.spage=22&rft.isbn=&rft.btitle=Fish-Community+Composition+in+Otselic+River%2C+in+the+Vicinity+of+Whitney+Point+Lake%2C+Broome+and+Cortland+Counties%2C+New+York+2000&rft.title=Fish-Community+Composition+in+Otselic+River%2C+in+the+Vicinity+of+Whitney+Point+Lake%2C+Broome+and+Cortland+Counties%2C+New+York+2000&rft.issn=&rft_id=info:doi/ LA - English DB - ProQuest Environmental Science Collection N1 - Name - Department of the Interior, Bureau of Land Management, North Palm Springs, California; DOI N1 - Date revised - 2006-05-01 N1 - SuppNotes - Draft. Preparation date: May 31, 2002 N1 - Last updated - 2011-12-16 ER - TY - RPRT T1 - HEADWATERS FOREST RESERVE RESOURCE MANAGEMENT PLAN, HUMBOLDT COUNTY, CALIFORNIA. AN - 36419344; 9330 AB - PURPOSE: The implementation of a resource management plan for the 7,472-acre Headwaters Forest Reserve, located in the mountainous north coast region of California, is proposed. The reserve was acquired by the Department of the Interior and the California state government in 1999 to preserve the last unprotected large stand of old-growth redwood forest. Unique ecological values of the forest include a highly intact, functioning old-growth forest ecosystem that has very large old-growth redwood and Douglas-fir trees; a highly diverse inventory of plant species in the forest understory, nesting habitat for threatened marbled murrelets and spotted owls; and undisturbed headwater stream habitat for threatened coho and chinook salmon and steelhead trout. The reserve includes 3,088 acres of underharvested redwood groves surrounded by 4,384 acres of previously harvested forest and brushlands. Key issues include the need for species management, the conduct of research and monitoring activities, public access, provision of minimal facilities, and a management budget. Watershed and forest restoration were considered particularly important in the planning process. Numerous alternatives, including a No Action Alternative, are considered in this draft EIS. Areas addressed by alternatives include those related to the intensity of watershed restoration; the intensity forest restoration; the availability of access by the public from the south; the extent of trail access throughout the reserve; the nature of trail use; the potential for special area designations for some or all of the reserve, including Area of critical Environmental Concern, Research Natural Area, Wilderness Study Area, Wild and Scenic River System, and State of California Ecological Reserve; and the implementation of access fees. POSITIVE IMPACTS: The plan would allow for the conservation and study of the land, fish, wildlife, and forested lands occurring within the area. Plan components would ensure that human activities in the area are compatible with the ecological integrity and preservation of the reserve's natural resources. NEGATIVE IMPACTS: Restrictions on reserve use would access recreational and commercial uses of reserve resources. Watershed restoration and other activities could result in short-term damage to wildlife habitat. Residents of the area could suffer due to increased visitation by recreationists. LEGAL MANDATES: Antiquities Act of 1906 (61 U.S.C. 431 et seq.), Endangered Species Act of 1973 (16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.), Federal Land Policy and Management Act of 1976 (43 U.S.C. 1701 et seq.), and Migratory Bird Treaty Act of 1918 (16 U.S.C. 703 et seq.). JF - EPA number: 020214, 276 pages and maps, May 24, 2002 PY - 2002 KW - Parks, Refuges and Forests KW - Agency number: DES 02-18 KW - Birds KW - Conservation KW - Endangered Species (Animals) KW - Fish KW - Forests KW - Preserves KW - Recreation Facilities KW - Recreation Resources KW - Recreation Resources Management KW - Research KW - Trails KW - Vegetation KW - Visual Resources Surveys KW - Watersheds KW - Wilderness KW - Wildlife Habitat KW - Wildlife Surveys KW - California KW - Headwaters Forest Reserve KW - Antiquities Act of 1906, Compliance KW - Endangered Species Act of 1973, Animals KW - Federal Land Policy and Management Act of 1976, Compliance KW - Migratory Bird Treaty Act of 1918, Compliance UR - http://libproxy.lib.unc.edu/login?url=http://search.proquest.com/docview/36419344?accountid=14244 L2 - http://vb3lk7eb4t.search.serialssolutions.com/?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&rfr_id=info:sid/Environmental+Impact+Statements%3A+Digests&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=report&rft.jtitle=&rft.atitle=&rft.au=&rft.aulast=&rft.aufirst=&rft.date=2002-05-24&rft.volume=&rft.issue=&rft.spage=&rft.isbn=&rft.btitle=HEADWATERS+FOREST+RESERVE+RESOURCE+MANAGEMENT+PLAN%2C+HUMBOLDT+COUNTY%2C+CALIFORNIA.&rft.title=HEADWATERS+FOREST+RESERVE+RESOURCE+MANAGEMENT+PLAN%2C+HUMBOLDT+COUNTY%2C+CALIFORNIA.&rft.issn=&rft_id=info:doi/ LA - English DB - ProQuest Environmental Science Collection N1 - Name - Department of the Interior, Bureau of Land Management, Arcata, California; DOI N1 - Date revised - 2006-05-01 N1 - SuppNotes - Draft. Preparation date: May 24, 2002 N1 - Last updated - 2011-12-16 ER - TY - RPRT T1 - STILLWATER NATIONAL WILDLIFE REFUGE COMPLEX COMPREHENSIVE CONSERVATION PLAN AND BOUNDARY REVISION, CHURCHILL AND WASHOE COUNTIES, NEVADA. AN - 36411273; 9319 AB - PURPOSE: The establishment of a 15-year comprehensive conservation plan and associated boundary scenarios for the Stillwater National Wildlife Refuge (NWR) Complex, Churchill and Washoe counties, Nevada is proposed. The NWR is comprised of the Stillwater NWR, Fallon NWR, Stillwater Wildlife Management Area (WMA), and Anaho Island NWR. Together these refuges and the WMA, which lie in central Nevada, contribute to the conservation of wildlife and their habitat in the western Great Basin. The lands included in the areas encompass a great diversity of habitats, from freshwater marshes and river habitats to brackish marshes and alkali playas. The areas also include extensive salt desert shrublands, a 25-mile-long sand dune complex, and a small island in a desert lake. These habitats attract nearly 400 species of vertebrate wildlife and countless species of invertebrates. Key issues identified during scoping include those related to fish, wildlife, plants, priority public uses in the NWR System, other public uses, cultural resources, Newlands Irrigation Project Operations activities, uses of the affected area for training of personal at Naval Air Station Fallon, and local economic effects. Five alternatives, including a No Action Alternative (Alternative A), are considered in this final EIS. Alternative B would result in the lands within the Stillater WMA reverting back to the U.S. Bureau of Reclamation of public land status and would focus on providing fall and winter habitat for waterfowl and opportunities for waterfowl hunting on the Stilllwater NWR and breeding habitat for waterbirds on Fallon NWR. Under Alternative C, the Stillwater NWR would be expanded to include most of the Stillwater WMA and the Fallon NWR as well as additional riparian and dune habitat. Alternative C would emphasize the approximation of natural biological diversity, with adjustments to enhance breeding habitat for waterfowl and fall and winter habitat for waterfowl, and would provide opportunities for wildlife observation and environmental education. The plan would include components for fire management, cultural resources management, and monitoring and research. Alternative D, in which the Stillwater NWR would be expanded to include all of the Stillwater WMA and the Fallown NWR as well as additional riparian area and dune habitat, would focus on restoring natural hydrologic patterns and other ecological processes. Public management under Alternative D would focus on providing opportunities for wildlife observation and environmental education. Under any alternative, the Anaho Island NWR would be managed much as it has been in the past, with continued emphasis on protecting the nesting colony of American while pelicans and other colony-nesting birds that use the island. Alternative E, the newly preferred alternative, would closely follow the structure of Alternative C, incorporating elements of all alternatives, but remaining within the range of options analyzed in the draft EIS. Under all alternatives, Anaho Island National wildlife Refuge would be managed much as it has in the past, with continued emphasis on protecting the American white pelican and other colonial nesting birds that use the island. Estimated costs of facilities development under Alternative E, including construction of an administrative/visitor complex and development of auto tour routes, nature trails, observation areas, and interpretive signs, is estimated at approximately $8.3 million. The annual costs of managing the complex are estimated at $3.3 million to $3.4 million. POSITIVE IMPACTS: Habitat for all species within the NWR Complex, including endangered species of plants and animals, would be protected and, in some cases, enhanced under the preferred alternative. Cultural and economic interests would also be forwarded. NEGATIVE IMPACTS: Management activities would adversely affect various components of the Lahotan Valley environment, including the social and economic environment. Although the extent of wetland habitat to be retained through the fall and winter would increased considerably over existing conditions, wetland would not increase to the extent that it would under the No Action Alternative; hence, less waterfowl habitat would be provide than otherwise. Construction of administrative/visitor facilities would displace habitat and increased visitation would result in increased disturbance of wildlife. Use of pesticides to control salt cedar and other invasive vegetation could have short-term impacts on native vegetation. Smoke from prescribed burning could degrade visual quality, through this would occur fewer than five days per year. Hydropower generation would decline, resulting in economic losses. LEGAL MANDATES: National Wildlife Refuge System Administration Act of 1966 (P.L. 94-233) and Truckee-Carson-Pyramid Lake Water Rights Act of 1990 (P.L. 101-618). PRIOR REFERENCES: For the abstract of the draft EIS, see 00-0267D, Volume 24, Number 3. JF - EPA number: 020203, Summary--55 pages, Volume 1--770 pages, Volume 2--891 pages, Volume 3--379 pages, May 17, 2002 PY - 2002 KW - Parks, Refuges and Forests KW - Agency number: FES 02-11 KW - Biologic Assessments KW - Birds KW - Burning (Prescribed) KW - Cultural Resources Management KW - Desert Land KW - Dunes KW - Endangered Species (Animals) KW - Endangered Species (Plants) KW - Fire Control KW - Fish KW - Hunting Management KW - Impact Monitoring Plans KW - Irrigation KW - Preserves KW - Recreation Facilities KW - Recreation Resources Management KW - Trails KW - Visual Resources KW - Wetlands KW - Wildlife KW - Wildlife Habitat KW - Wildlife Management KW - Wildlife Surveys KW - Anaho Island National Wildlife Refuge KW - Nevada KW - Stillwater National Wildlife Refuge KW - National Wildlife Refuge System Administration Act of 1966, Compliance KW - Truckee-Carson-Pyramid Lake Water Rights Act of 1990, Compliance UR - http://libproxy.lib.unc.edu/login?url=http://search.proquest.com/docview/36411273?accountid=14244 L2 - http://vb3lk7eb4t.search.serialssolutions.com/?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&rfr_id=info:sid/Environmental+Impact+Statements%3A+Digests&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=report&rft.jtitle=&rft.atitle=&rft.au=&rft.aulast=&rft.aufirst=&rft.date=2001-01-01&rft.volume=&rft.issue=&rft.spage=20&rft.isbn=&rft.btitle=Simple+Calculator+of+Ballistic+Trajectories+for+Blocks+Ejected+during+Volcanic+Eruptions&rft.title=Simple+Calculator+of+Ballistic+Trajectories+for+Blocks+Ejected+during+Volcanic+Eruptions&rft.issn=&rft_id=info:doi/ LA - English DB - ProQuest Environmental Science Collection N1 - Name - Department of the Interior, Fish and Wildlife Service, Fallon, Nevada; DOI N1 - Date revised - 2006-05-01 N1 - SuppNotes - Final. Preparation date: May 17, 2002 N1 - Last updated - 2011-12-16 ER - TY - RPRT T1 - LITTLE ROCK CENTRAL HIGH SCHOOL NATIONAL HISTORIC SITE, LITTLE ROCK, PULASKI COUNTY, ARKANSAS. AN - 36416140; 9305 AB - PURPOSE: The implementation of a general management plan for the Little Rock Central High School National Historic Site in Little Rock, Arkansas is proposed. The school is the chief symbol of the end of racial segregation in public schools in the United States. It was the site of the first important test for implementation of the U.S. Supreme Court's historic "Brown v. Board of Education of Topeka" decision of May 17, 1954, which declared that segregation in the public school system was an unconstitutional violation of the "equal protection under the law" clause in the Fourteenth Amendment. The incidents at the school during the autumn of 1957 drew national and international attention, as Little Rock became the epitome of state resistance to the court order when Arkansas Governor Orval E. Faubus questioned the sanctity of the federal court system and the validity of the court's desegregation ruling. Four alternatives, including a No Action Alternative (Alternative 1), which would continue the existing management regime, are considered in this final EIS. The preferred alternative (Alternative 2) would emphasize the promotion of the maximum possible rehabilitation of the site while preserving its historic fabric, including the preservation of the front facade and landscape of the school, the Magnolia Mobile Service Station, and Ponder's Drug Store to reflect their appearance in 1957. This alternative would call for an expansion of the site boundary to include seven privately owned houses located across from the front of the school in order to protect the historic surroundings as well as for the development of a new visitor center cum park administration and operations facility. The major stories involving the high school would be comprehensively interpreted. Visitors to the site would experience interpreter-led programs. The staff would establish strong partnerships with the owners of cultural resources within the boundary of the expanded historic site to ensure preservation and interpretation of the site. Alternative 3 would call for sites throughout the city of Little Rosk that were associated with the events at Central High School during 1957 to be interpreted. Partnerships would be created to assist in preservation and interpretation of these sites. Visitor orientation and park administration would be located in leased space located near the site. Interpretative activities would be conducted at a variety of sites accessed by a shuttle transport system. Alternative 4 would call for the development of an education/center park administration and operations facility, which would allow for maximum educational media to interpret the site and associated sties. The media would be directed to a broad spectrum of learning styles and levels. Partnerships would be created with national and international Civil Rights sites for interpretative and educational purposes. Estimated costs of the preferred alternative range from $4.3 to $5.7 million. Annual operation and maintenance costs are estimated at $848,000. POSITIVE IMPACTS: Plan implementation would have major, long-term beneficial effects on historic properties and the historic streetscape associated with the site. The preferred alternative would provide an emotionally compelling interpretive experience, effective orientation, park ranger-led tours, and interpretive media out-of-doors. NEGATIVE IMPACTS: Increased visitation to the site would increase traffic levels and noise in the vicinity significantly. As traffic increased, some residents could feel as though they were "on display", and potentially higher property values and taxes could negatively affect some residents. LEGAL MANDATES: Public Law 105-356 (112 Stat. 3268) and Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisition Policies Act of 1970 (42 U.S.C. 4601). PRIOR REFERENCES: For the abstract of the draft EIS, see 02-0081D, Volume 26, Number 1. JF - EPA number: 020189, 223 pages, May 10, 2002 PY - 2002 KW - Urban and Social Programs KW - Agency number: FES 02-12 KW - Cost Assessments KW - Cultural Resources KW - Historic Districts KW - Historic Sites KW - Historic Sites Surveys KW - Land Acquisitions KW - Land Management KW - Parking KW - Recreation KW - Recreation Resources KW - Relocations-Property Acquisitions KW - Schools KW - Socioeconomic Assessments KW - Traffic Analyses KW - Transportation KW - Arkansas KW - Public Law 105-356, Project Authorization KW - Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisition Policies Act of 1970, Compliance UR - http://libproxy.lib.unc.edu/login?url=http://search.proquest.com/docview/36416140?accountid=14244 L2 - http://vb3lk7eb4t.search.serialssolutions.com/?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&rfr_id=info:sid/Environmental+Impact+Statements%3A+Digests&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=report&rft.jtitle=&rft.atitle=&rft.au=&rft.aulast=&rft.aufirst=&rft.date=2002-05-10&rft.volume=&rft.issue=&rft.spage=&rft.isbn=&rft.btitle=LITTLE+ROCK+CENTRAL+HIGH+SCHOOL+NATIONAL+HISTORIC+SITE%2C+LITTLE+ROCK%2C+PULASKI+COUNTY%2C+ARKANSAS.&rft.title=LITTLE+ROCK+CENTRAL+HIGH+SCHOOL+NATIONAL+HISTORIC+SITE%2C+LITTLE+ROCK%2C+PULASKI+COUNTY%2C+ARKANSAS.&rft.issn=&rft_id=info:doi/ LA - English DB - ProQuest Environmental Science Collection N1 - Name - Department of the Interior, National Park Service, Little Rock, Arkansas; DOI N1 - Date revised - 2006-05-01 N1 - SuppNotes - Final. Preparation date: May 10, 2002 N1 - Last updated - 2011-12-16 ER - TY - RPRT T1 - DEVILS TOWER NATIONAL MONUMENT, CROOK COUNTY, WYOMING. AN - 36411231; 9306 AB - PURPOSE: The implementation of a new general management plan for the Devil's Tower National Monument in Crook County, Wyoming is proposed to manage land, resources, and use within the monument over the next 10 to 15 years. The 1,347-acre monument, which lies on the northwest edge of the Black Hills, is focused on Devil's Tower, a prominence consisting entirely of igneous rock is one of the most conspicuous geological features of the Black Hills region. Currently, the monument suffers from visitor congestion, placing stress on the natural beauty of the area and making administration of the monument difficult. Five alternatives, including a No Action Alternative (Alternative 1), which would perpetuate the existing management regime, are considered in this final EIS. Under the preferred alternative (Alternative 3), a shuttle system would be established and visitors would be required to park at a staging area during peak use times; from the staging area, visitors could hike, bicycle, or ride the shuttle to the Tower. Restrooms, a bookstore, expanded picnic sites, and access to the prairie dog town would be available at the staging area, and orientation and interpretation would be offered there. Tour buses would be required to return to the staging area to park after dropping off passengers at the Tower. The paved parking area at the base of the Tower would be converted to a landscaped pedestrian plaza designed with sensitivity to the historic context. The focus of current visitor use would be on interpretation rather than on orientation. The gravel-surfaced parking area would be paved for parking and a shuttle stop. The beginning expanse of the Tower trail would be redesigned for easier access. Trailer drop-off areas would be restored to native vegetation. The campground and other facilities in the Belle Fourche River floodplain would be eliminated and the area restored to natural conditions. The prairie dot town pullouts along the main road would be replaced with larger pullouts on both side of the road. Where two-track dirt roads make up part of the trail, one track would be restored to native vegetation, leaving the other track to function as a trail. A spur trail would be created to link the Joyner Ridge and Red Beds trails. To maximize resource protection and opportunities for solitude, lighter restrictions would be implemented in the northwest corner of the monument, with parties of one to five self-registering and parties of six or more registering with a ranger. Visitor use of the north and west roads would be prohibited beyond the Joyner Ridge trailhead, where the road would be restricted to administrative and private use only. The headquarters building would be expanded to increase office and storage space. POSITIVE IMPACTS: The plan would reduce visitor congestion and the associated administrative problems and bring the monument closer to its natural setting. Wildlife habitat and floodplain conditions would be enhanced. The shuttle system would improve air quality, particularly at the base of the Tower. Closing campgrounds would also improve air quality due to elimination of campfires. Archaeological sites would be less likely to be disturbed by visitors. Construction activities would result in 71 one-year construction jobs. NEGATIVE IMPACTS: Construction activities would displace wetlands. The implementation of the shuttle system would degrade the recreational experience for visitors who placed a high value on spontaneity, privacy, and independence. Visitors' freedom of movement would be restricted due to the reduction in road access in the northwest corner of the monument and by the requirement for use permits. LEGAL MANDATES: Antiquities Act of 1906 (16 U.S.C. 431 et seq.), General Authorities Act of 1970, National Park Service Organic Act of 1916 (PL Chapter 438, 39 Stat 535), and Proclamation 638. PRIOR REFERENCES: For the abstract of the draft EIS, see 01-0304D, Volume 25, Number 3. JF - EPA number: 020190, 234 pages, May 10, 2002 PY - 2002 KW - Parks, Refuges and Forests KW - Air Quality KW - Archaeological Sites KW - Employment KW - Floodplains KW - Geologic Sites KW - Historic Sites KW - Land Management KW - Monuments KW - National Parks KW - Parking KW - Recreation Resources KW - Recreation Resources Management KW - Roads KW - Trails KW - Vegetation KW - Wildlife Habitat KW - Wildlife Management KW - Devils Tower National Monument KW - Wyoming KW - Antiquities Act of 1906, Compliance KW - General Authorities Act of 1970, Compliance KW - National Park Service Organic Act of 1916, Compliance KW - Proclamation 638, Project Authorization UR - http://libproxy.lib.unc.edu/login?url=http://search.proquest.com/docview/36411231?accountid=14244 L2 - http://vb3lk7eb4t.search.serialssolutions.com/?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&rfr_id=info:sid/Environmental+Impact+Statements%3A+Digests&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=report&rft.jtitle=&rft.atitle=&rft.au=Vallance%2C+J+W%3BSchilling%2C+S+P%3BDevoli%2C+G&rft.aulast=Vallance&rft.aufirst=J&rft.date=2001-01-01&rft.volume=&rft.issue=&rft.spage=18&rft.isbn=&rft.btitle=Lahar+Hazards+at+Mombacho+Volcano%2C+Nicaragua&rft.title=Lahar+Hazards+at+Mombacho+Volcano%2C+Nicaragua&rft.issn=&rft_id=info:doi/ LA - English DB - ProQuest Environmental Science Collection N1 - Name - Department of the Interior, National Park Service, Devils Tower, Wyoming; DOI N1 - Date revised - 2006-05-01 N1 - SuppNotes - Final. Preparation date: May 10, 2002 N1 - Last updated - 2011-12-16 ER - TY - RPRT T1 - TONTO NATIONAL MONUMENT, GILA COUNTY, ARIZONA. AN - 36436868; 9299 AB - PURPOSE: The implementation of a 10- to 15-year general management plan for the Tonto National Monument, Gila County, Arizona is proposed. The 1,120-acre monument is located in east-central Arizona approximately 50 miles east of Phoenix in a rapidly changing regional environment. The monument was established to protect numerous prehistoric archaeological sites, including two Gila-phase cliff dwellings of the Salado culture. The primary sites are the Upper and Lower Cliff Dwellings. Rock shelters overlooking Tonto Basin have protected the nearly 700-year-old masonry cliff dwellings and 50 surface sites also have been documented within the monument area. Six of the archaeological sites on the List of Classified Structures. Evidence of Archaic, Apache, or Yavapai, and historic Euro-American occupations is also found among the sites within the boundaries of the monument. Archaeological excavations have revealed well-preserved collections of pottery, agricultural tools, ornaments, textiles, and other artifacts. The diversity of the natural setting, located between steep cliffs and bajadas (gently sloping hills) supports rich Sonoran Desert vegetation. The astonishing variety of plants provides habitat for over 200 species of wildlife. Much has changed since the monument's existing management plan was completed in 1962. The existing plan is insufficient to provide adequate guidance for the current management of the monument. There is a potential for greatly increased tourism within the Tonto Basin as a result of new and expanded recreational facilities at Roosevelt Lake, improved highway access from Globe and Payson, and the increased growth of the Phoenix metropolitan area. Four alternatives, including a No Action Alternative, are considered in this draft EIS. The preferred alternative would involve construction of a new administrative facility within monument boundaries to improve staff needs and the remodeling of the existing visitor center to increase visitor orientation and educational opportunities. POSITIVE IMPACTS: In addition to improving staff efficiency and enhancing visitor experience, the proposed action would improve the management of cultural and natural resources associated with the monument area. Increased visitation would contribute to the local economy. NEGATIVE IMPACTS: Construction activities within the monument would disturb natural vegetation and the associated wildlife habitat. Increased visitation could result in vandalism and other disturbance of cultural sites. LEGAL MANDATES: Executive Order 6116 and Presidential Proclamations 787 and 2230. JF - EPA number: 020183, 170 pages, May 9, 2002 PY - 2002 KW - Parks, Refuges and Forests KW - Agency number: DES 02-19 KW - Archaeological Sites KW - Cultural Resources KW - Cultural Resources Assessments KW - Cultural Resources Management KW - Cultural Resources Surveys KW - Desert Land KW - Historic Sites KW - Floodplains KW - Land Management KW - Monuments KW - National Parks KW - Recreation KW - Vegetation KW - Water Resources KW - Wetlands KW - Wildlife Habitat KW - Arizona KW - Tonto National Monument KW - Executive Order 6166, Compliance KW - Presidential Proclamation 787, Compliance KW - Presidential Proclamation 2230, Compliance UR - http://libproxy.lib.unc.edu/login?url=http://search.proquest.com/docview/36436868?accountid=14244 L2 - http://vb3lk7eb4t.search.serialssolutions.com/?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&rfr_id=info:sid/Environmental+Impact+Statements%3A+Digests&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=report&rft.jtitle=&rft.atitle=&rft.au=&rft.aulast=&rft.aufirst=&rft.date=2001-01-01&rft.volume=&rft.issue=&rft.spage=16&rft.isbn=&rft.btitle=Lahar+Hazards+at+Concepcion+Volcano%2C+Nicaragua&rft.title=Lahar+Hazards+at+Concepcion+Volcano%2C+Nicaragua&rft.issn=&rft_id=info:doi/ LA - English DB - ProQuest Environmental Science Collection N1 - Name - Department of the Interior, National Park Service, Roosevelt, Arizona; DOI N1 - Date revised - 2006-05-01 N1 - SuppNotes - Draft. Preparation date: May 9, 2002 N1 - Last updated - 2011-12-16 ER - TY - RPRT T1 - MESQUITE MINE EXPANSION, IMPERIAL COUNTY, CALIFORNIA (SCH. NO. 98121054/BLM NO. 40204). AN - 36436836; 9291 AB - PURPOSE: The issuance of a permit for the expansion of gold ore mining and processing and waste rock disposal in and near Newmont Gold Company's exiting Mesquite Mine, Imperial County, California is proposed. The 5,200-acre mine site is located at the southern end of the Chocolate Mountains, approximately 33 miles east of Brawley. To date, 3,655 acres have been disturbed by mining activities. Prior permits issued by the Bureau of Land Management (BLM) and Imperial County allow mining and related disturbance on 4,962 acres. Proposed new activities would include expansion of existing mine pits, excavation of diversion channels to keep surface waters from flowing into the pits, development of heap leach pad areas for removal of gold from ore, and development of overburden/interburden storage areas for storage of waste rock. Approximately 89 million tons of gold ore would be processed, and 242 million tons of overburden/interburden would be removed. In addition to the applicant's proposal, this final EIS considers a No Action Alternative and a Reduced Footprint Alternative. The latter alternative would forego development of one overburden/interburden storage area and would reduce the sizes two other overburden /interburden storage areas by a total of 45 acres. POSITIVE IMPACTS: Approval of the expansion would allow the mine to continue to operate through 2006; otherwise, the mine would close in 2001. Gold to be mined would contribute significantly to the national stocks of this precious metal. Mining operations would continue to employ local workers and provide tax revenues to the Imperial County and trust funds managed by the State Lands Commission. NEGATIVE IMPACTS: Under the applicant's proposal, new facilities would disturb 693 acres of soils, vegetation, and the associated wildlife habitat, of which only 190 acres would represent new disturbance areas for which the new permits would be required. Approximately 20 percent of the proposed expansion areas would be located on private land, 13 percent on state land, and 67 percent on BLM land. Project structures and changes in the landscape due to mining would affect visual aesthetics in the area. Particulate matter released during mining and disposal operations would affect air quality in a nonattainment area for that pollutant. LEGAL MANDATES: Federal Land Policy and Management Act of 1976 (43 U.S.C. 1701 et seq.) and Mineral and Mining Policy Act of 1970 (30 U.S.C. 21a). PRIOR REFERENCES: For the abstract of the draft EIS, see 00-0359D, Volume 24, Number 4. JF - EPA number: 020175, 225 pages, May 3, 2002 PY - 2002 KW - Land Use KW - Agency number: BLM No. CA-40204 KW - Air Quality KW - Air Quality Standards Violations KW - Employment KW - Metals KW - Mineral Resources KW - Mining KW - Particulates KW - Reclamation KW - Socioeconomic Assessments KW - Soils KW - Vegetation KW - Vegetation Surveys KW - Visual Resources KW - Waste Disposal KW - Wildlife Habitat KW - California KW - Federal Land Policy and Management Act of 1976, Compliance KW - Mining and Mineral Policy Act of 1970, Compliance UR - http://libproxy.lib.unc.edu/login?url=http://search.proquest.com/docview/36436836?accountid=14244 L2 - http://vb3lk7eb4t.search.serialssolutions.com/?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&rfr_id=info:sid/Environmental+Impact+Statements%3A+Digests&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=report&rft.jtitle=&rft.atitle=&rft.au=&rft.aulast=&rft.aufirst=&rft.date=2002-05-03&rft.volume=&rft.issue=&rft.spage=&rft.isbn=&rft.btitle=MESQUITE+MINE+EXPANSION%2C+IMPERIAL+COUNTY%2C+CALIFORNIA+%28SCH.+NO.+98121054%2FBLM+NO.+40204%29.&rft.title=MESQUITE+MINE+EXPANSION%2C+IMPERIAL+COUNTY%2C+CALIFORNIA+%28SCH.+NO.+98121054%2FBLM+NO.+40204%29.&rft.issn=&rft_id=info:doi/ LA - English DB - ProQuest Environmental Science Collection N1 - Name - Department of the Interior, Bureau of Land Management, El Centro, California; DOI N1 - Date revised - 2006-05-01 N1 - SuppNotes - Final. Preparation date: May 3, 2002 N1 - Last updated - 2011-12-16 ER - TY - RPRT T1 - MESQUITE MINE EXPANSION, IMPERIAL COUNTY, CALIFORNIA (SCH. NO. 98121054/BLM NO. 40204). [Part 1 of 1] T2 - MESQUITE MINE EXPANSION, IMPERIAL COUNTY, CALIFORNIA (SCH. NO. 98121054/BLM NO. 40204). AN - 36378298; 9291-020175_0001 AB - PURPOSE: The issuance of a permit for the expansion of gold ore mining and processing and waste rock disposal in and near Newmont Gold Company's exiting Mesquite Mine, Imperial County, California is proposed. The 5,200-acre mine site is located at the southern end of the Chocolate Mountains, approximately 33 miles east of Brawley. To date, 3,655 acres have been disturbed by mining activities. Prior permits issued by the Bureau of Land Management (BLM) and Imperial County allow mining and related disturbance on 4,962 acres. Proposed new activities would include expansion of existing mine pits, excavation of diversion channels to keep surface waters from flowing into the pits, development of heap leach pad areas for removal of gold from ore, and development of overburden/interburden storage areas for storage of waste rock. Approximately 89 million tons of gold ore would be processed, and 242 million tons of overburden/interburden would be removed. In addition to the applicant's proposal, this final EIS considers a No Action Alternative and a Reduced Footprint Alternative. The latter alternative would forego development of one overburden/interburden storage area and would reduce the sizes two other overburden /interburden storage areas by a total of 45 acres. POSITIVE IMPACTS: Approval of the expansion would allow the mine to continue to operate through 2006; otherwise, the mine would close in 2001. Gold to be mined would contribute significantly to the national stocks of this precious metal. Mining operations would continue to employ local workers and provide tax revenues to the Imperial County and trust funds managed by the State Lands Commission. NEGATIVE IMPACTS: Under the applicant's proposal, new facilities would disturb 693 acres of soils, vegetation, and the associated wildlife habitat, of which only 190 acres would represent new disturbance areas for which the new permits would be required. Approximately 20 percent of the proposed expansion areas would be located on private land, 13 percent on state land, and 67 percent on BLM land. Project structures and changes in the landscape due to mining would affect visual aesthetics in the area. Particulate matter released during mining and disposal operations would affect air quality in a nonattainment area for that pollutant. LEGAL MANDATES: Federal Land Policy and Management Act of 1976 (43 U.S.C. 1701 et seq.) and Mineral and Mining Policy Act of 1970 (30 U.S.C. 21a). PRIOR REFERENCES: For the abstract of the draft EIS, see 00-0359D, Volume 24, Number 4. JF - EPA number: 020175, 225 pages, May 3, 2002 PY - 2002 VL - 1 KW - Land Use KW - Agency number: BLM No. CA-40204 KW - Air Quality KW - Air Quality Standards Violations KW - Employment KW - Metals KW - Mineral Resources KW - Mining KW - Particulates KW - Reclamation KW - Socioeconomic Assessments KW - Soils KW - Vegetation KW - Vegetation Surveys KW - Visual Resources KW - Waste Disposal KW - Wildlife Habitat KW - California KW - Federal Land Policy and Management Act of 1976, Compliance KW - Mining and Mineral Policy Act of 1970, Compliance UR - http://libproxy.lib.unc.edu/login?url=http://search.proquest.com/docview/36378298?accountid=14244 L2 - http://vb3lk7eb4t.search.serialssolutions.com/?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&rfr_id=info:sid/Environmental+Impact+Statements%3A+Full+Text&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=report&rft.jtitle=&rft.atitle=&rft.au=&rft.aulast=&rft.aufirst=&rft.date=2002-05-03&rft.volume=&rft.issue=&rft.spage=&rft.isbn=&rft.btitle=MESQUITE+MINE+EXPANSION%2C+IMPERIAL+COUNTY%2C+CALIFORNIA+%28SCH.+NO.+98121054%2FBLM+NO.+40204%29.&rft.title=MESQUITE+MINE+EXPANSION%2C+IMPERIAL+COUNTY%2C+CALIFORNIA+%28SCH.+NO.+98121054%2FBLM+NO.+40204%29.&rft.issn=&rft_id=info:doi/ LA - English DB - ProQuest Environmental Science Collection N1 - Name - Department of the Interior, Bureau of Land Management, El Centro, California; DOI N1 - Date revised - 2006-05-01 N1 - SuppNotes - Final. Preparation date: May 3, 2002 N1 - Last updated - 2011-12-16 ER - TY - GEN T1 - Institutional Efficiency and Student Success: The Relationship between Credits-to-Degree, Time-to-Degree and Graduation Rates. Occasional Research Brief. AN - 62200667; ED468367 AB - In 1995, the Board of Regents of the University of Wisconsin System (UW) established a goal of decreased attempted credits-to-degree from 145 to 140 by the 2000-2001 school year with the objective of increased institutional efficiency. This research brief draws on UW data to look at the experience of UW institutions in achieving this objective and the relationship of credits-to-degree to time-to-degree and graduation rates. Average credits-to-degree have decreased since the 1993-1994 academic year. From the 1993-1994 to 2000-2001 school years, the UW System average number of credits-to-degree decreased from 145 to 137, exceeding the system goal. All institutions in the system reduced their average credits-to degree, and 10 of 13 institutions met their individual goals. The mean credits-to-degree was 137, but the median was 134. This difference illustrates that the few graduates who attempt an exceptionally large number of credits skew the average. Eighty percent of degree programs require 120 credits, but 1 in 5 requires more. Most such programs are in education, allied health, and engineering programs where degree requirements are established to meet professional and occupational licensure expectations. As long as policies and interventions designed to support increasing graduate rates are compatible with decreasing time-to-degree, credits-to-degree should continue to decrease. Nine appendixes contain detailed tables of credit information. (Contains 23 tables.) (SLD) Y1 - 2002/05// PY - 2002 DA - May 2002 SP - 29 PB - University of Wisconsin System, Office of Policy Analysis and Research, 1534 Van Hise Hall, 1220 Linden Drive, Madison, WI 53706. Tel: 608-262-6441. For full text: http://www.uwsa.edu/opar/pdf/ctdorb02.pdf. KW - University of Wisconsin KW - ERIC, Resources in Education (RIE) KW - Degrees (Academic) KW - College Graduates KW - Academic Achievement KW - Higher Education KW - Educational Attainment KW - Credit Courses KW - College Credits UR - http://libproxy.lib.unc.edu/login?url=http://search.proquest.com/docview/62200667?accountid=14244 LA - English DB - ERIC N1 - Last updated - 2017-02-24 ER - TY - JOUR T1 - Mineral assessment of the Stikine area, central Southeast Alaska AN - 51983124; 2003-038427 AB - In 1997 the U.S. Department of the Interior, Bureau of Land Management (BLM) began a 4-year mineral resource assessment of the Stikine area in central Southeast Alaska. The 5.7-million-acre study area encompasses the mainland bordering Frederick Sound and Kupreanof, Kuiu, Zarembo, Wrangell, Etolin, and nearby islands. The study area covers the Kupreanof and Petersburg Mining Districts, the Wrangell Subdistrict, and additional lands not included in adjacent mining district studies. As the primary land manager in the area, the U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, requested that the BLM assess the mineral potential in the Stikine area for the purpose of generating information that will aid the agency in future judgements regarding land management. This report serves as the final, comprehensive presentation of information gathered during the Stikine area study from 1997 to 2000. Over 175 mineral occurrences, industrial mineral sites, and geophysical anomalies were examined during this study. Also, over 130 localities were sampled to follow up road systems, USGS geochemical anomalies, and unpublished, mineral exploration company data. The Stikine area hosts a variety of mineral deposit types, including volcanogenic massive sulfide (VMS), polymetallic replacement, polymetallic vein, vein gold, skarn, porphyry molybdenum, magmatic segregation, and veins of barite. In addition, there are minor deposits of placer gold, uranium, and coal. The Castle Island Mine produced 787,000 tons of barite between 1966 and 1980 (Carnes, 1980) from a VMS deposit. Minor gold production came from vein gold deposits of the Maid of Mexico (Chapin, 1918) and Helen S (Wright and Wright, 1908) mines in the early part of the twentieth century (U.S. Bureau of Mines, Mine Production Records). Based on the distribution and types of prospects, geology, geophysics, deposit models, and information from mineral exploration companies, this report delineates the Duncan Canal, Groundhog-Berg Basin, and Cornwallis Peninsula areas as "known mineral deposit areas" (KMDA's). This implies that these areas have a higher relative likelihood for hosting a significant mineral deposit than other parts of the Stikine area. The Duncan Canal KMDA, located along Duncan Canal, and on Woewodski and Zarembo islands, contains 19 sites with known or suspected VMS mineralization. These occurrences share Triassic host rocks of the Alexander terrane with deposits of known significance to the north, the Greens Creek Mine on Admiralty Island and the massive Windy Craggy deposit in northwestern British Columbia. The Groundhog-Berg Basin KMDA is located on the mainland near Wrangell. It contains 20 prospects with replacement, skarn, polymetallic vein, and vein gold mineralization and also some potential for porphyry copper and molybdenum deposits. The deposits in the area are rich in silver, lead, and zinc and have attracted significant exploration over the years. The Cornwallis Peninsula KMDA on the north end of Kuiu Island is host to several polymetallic replacement and polymetallic vein deposits of lead and zinc and several small deposits of barite and witherite. As they are presently understood, these occurrences are too small and discontinuous to attract development. However, there are sufficient values and indications of extent to attract some exploration interest. JF - BLM - Alaska Technical Report AU - Still, Jan C AU - Bittenbender, Peter E AU - Bean, Kirby W AU - Gensler, Edward G Y1 - 2002/05// PY - 2002 DA - May 2002 SP - 557 EP - 557, 4 sheets PB - U. S. Department of the Interior, Bureau of Land Management, Alaska State Office, Anchorage, AK KW - Scale: 1:250,000 KW - Type: site location maps KW - Type: colored site location maps KW - Type: colored index map KW - Type: colored economic geology maps KW - United States KW - mineral exploration KW - molybdenum ores KW - igneous rocks KW - Petersburg mining district KW - Alexander Archipelago KW - silver ores KW - spatial distribution KW - Stikine Alaska KW - metamorphic rocks KW - polymetallic ores KW - gold ores KW - copper ores KW - skarn KW - Southeastern Alaska KW - geophysical methods KW - site location maps KW - veins KW - porphyry KW - massive sulfide deposits KW - uranium ores KW - maps KW - metal ores KW - massive deposits KW - economic geology maps KW - Alaska KW - index maps KW - metasomatic rocks KW - Kupreanof mining district KW - 27A:Economic geology, geology of ore deposits UR - http://libproxy.lib.unc.edu/login?url=http://search.proquest.com/docview/51983124?accountid=14244 L2 - http://vb3lk7eb4t.search.serialssolutions.com/?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&rfr_id=info:sid/GeoRef&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=book&rft.jtitle=&rft.atitle=&rft.au=Still%2C+Jan+C%3BBittenbender%2C+Peter+E%3BBean%2C+Kirby+W%3BGensler%2C+Edward+G&rft.aulast=Still&rft.aufirst=Jan&rft.date=2002-05-01&rft.volume=&rft.issue=&rft.spage=&rft.isbn=&rft.btitle=Mineral+assessment+of+the+Stikine+area%2C+central+Southeast+Alaska&rft.title=Mineral+assessment+of+the+Stikine+area%2C+central+Southeast+Alaska&rft.issn=&rft_id=info:doi/ L2 - http://www.blm.gov/ak/st/en/info/gen_pubs/tr.html LA - English DB - GeoRef N1 - Copyright - GeoRef, Copyright 2012, American Geosciences Institute. N1 - Date revised - 2003-01-01 N1 - Number of references - 220 N1 - PubXState - AK N1 - Document feature - illus. incl. 5 tables, sects. N1 - SuppNotes - Includes appendices N1 - Last updated - 2012-06-07 N1 - CODEN - #04969 N1 - SubjectsTermNotLitGenreText - Alaska; Alexander Archipelago; copper ores; economic geology maps; geophysical methods; gold ores; igneous rocks; index maps; Kupreanof mining district; maps; massive deposits; massive sulfide deposits; metal ores; metamorphic rocks; metasomatic rocks; mineral exploration; molybdenum ores; Petersburg mining district; polymetallic ores; porphyry; silver ores; site location maps; skarn; Southeastern Alaska; spatial distribution; Stikine Alaska; United States; uranium ores; veins ER - TY - BOOK T1 - Natural resource year in review, 2001 AN - 51863091; 2004-035068 JF - Natural resource year in review, 2001 Y1 - 2002/05// PY - 2002 DA - May 2002 SP - 70 PB - U. S. Department of the Interior, National Park Service, Lakewood, CO KW - United States KW - protection KW - geologic hazards KW - U. S. National Park Service KW - government agencies KW - national parks KW - public lands KW - remediation KW - natural resources KW - land management KW - risk assessment KW - ecology KW - land use KW - 22:Environmental geology UR - http://libproxy.lib.unc.edu/login?url=http://search.proquest.com/docview/51863091?accountid=14244 L2 - http://vb3lk7eb4t.search.serialssolutions.com/?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&rfr_id=info:sid/GeoRef&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=book&rft.jtitle=&rft.atitle=&rft.au=&rft.aulast=&rft.aufirst=&rft.date=2002-05-01&rft.volume=&rft.issue=&rft.spage=&rft.isbn=&rft.btitle=Age+and+Paleoenvironmental+Significance+of+Mega-Invertebrates+from+the+%27San+Pedro%27+Formation+in+the+Coyote+Hills%2C+Fullerton+and+Buena+Park%2C+Orange+County%2C+Southern+California&rft.title=Age+and+Paleoenvironmental+Significance+of+Mega-Invertebrates+from+the+%27San+Pedro%27+Formation+in+the+Coyote+Hills%2C+Fullerton+and+Buena+Park%2C+Orange+County%2C+Southern+California&rft.issn=&rft_id=info:doi/ LA - English DB - GeoRef N1 - Copyright - GeoRef, Copyright 2014, American Geosciences Institute. N1 - Date revised - 2004-01-01 N1 - PubXState - CO N1 - Last updated - 2014-09-18 ER - TY - BOOK T1 - Monitoring volcanic and earthquake unrest in Yellowstone AN - 51859549; 2004-035069 JF - Natural resource year in review, 2001 AU - Olliff, Tom Y1 - 2002/05// PY - 2002 DA - May 2002 PB - U. S. Department of the Interior, National Park Service, Lakewood, CO KW - United States KW - Global Positioning System KW - monitoring KW - geologic hazards KW - hydrothermal conditions KW - calderas KW - volcanic risk KW - volcanic features KW - seismicity KW - volcanism KW - eruptions KW - seismic risk KW - Yellowstone National Park KW - volcanoes KW - risk assessment KW - seismic networks KW - earthquakes KW - 19:Seismology KW - 22:Environmental geology UR - http://libproxy.lib.unc.edu/login?url=http://search.proquest.com/docview/51859549?accountid=14244 L2 - http://vb3lk7eb4t.search.serialssolutions.com/?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&rfr_id=info:sid/GeoRef&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=book&rft.jtitle=&rft.atitle=&rft.au=Olliff%2C+Tom&rft.aulast=Olliff&rft.aufirst=Tom&rft.date=2002-05-01&rft.volume=&rft.issue=&rft.spage=&rft.isbn=&rft.btitle=Monitoring+volcanic+and+earthquake+unrest+in+Yellowstone&rft.title=Monitoring+volcanic+and+earthquake+unrest+in+Yellowstone&rft.issn=&rft_id=info:doi/ LA - English DB - GeoRef N1 - Copyright - GeoRef, Copyright 2014, American Geosciences Institute. N1 - Date revised - 2004-01-01 N1 - PubXState - CO N1 - Document feature - illus. incl. block diag. N1 - Last updated - 2014-09-18 ER - TY - JOUR T1 - Effects of Urbanization on Stream Ecosystems AN - 14655915; 10642998 AB - The USGS National Water-Quality Assessment Program is monitoring the effects of urbanization on stream ecosystems in 15 metropolitan areas. Preliminary analysis of 1999 data reveals that rapid degradation of stream ecosystems occurs early in the process of watershed urbanization. Early degradation is also associated with deforestation and other processes that modify hydrology, stream temperature, and habitat. The magnitude of stream ecosystem response is generally greater when forests or rangeland are urbanized than when agricultural areas planted in row crops are urbanized. JF - USGS Fact Sheet 042-02 AU - Couch, Carol AU - Hamilton, Pixie Y1 - 2002/05// PY - 2002 DA - May 2002 PB - USGS, The Boulevard Kidlington Oxford OX5 1GB KW - Environment Abstracts KW - DEFORESTATION KW - URBANIZATION KW - MONITORING, WATER KW - WATER POLLUTION INDICATORS KW - URBAN WATER RESOURCES KW - STREAMS KW - AQUATIC ECOSYSTEMS KW - WATER POLLUTION EFFECTS KW - ENA 07:General UR - http://libproxy.lib.unc.edu/login?url=http://search.proquest.com/docview/14655915?accountid=14244 L2 - http://vb3lk7eb4t.search.serialssolutions.com/?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&rfr_id=info:sid/ProQ%3Aenvabstractsmodule&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=report&rft.jtitle=&rft.atitle=&rft.au=Ivahnenko%2C+T%3BGrady%2C+S+J%3BDelzer%2C+G+C&rft.aulast=Ivahnenko&rft.aufirst=T&rft.date=2001-01-01&rft.volume=&rft.issue=&rft.spage=&rft.isbn=&rft.btitle=Design+of+a+National+Survey+of+Methyl+tert-Butyl+Ether+and+Other+Volatile+Organic+Compounds+in+Drinking-Water+Sources&rft.title=Design+of+a+National+Survey+of+Methyl+tert-Butyl+Ether+and+Other+Volatile+Organic+Compounds+in+Drinking-Water+Sources&rft.issn=&rft_id=info:doi/ L2 - http://www.csa.com/htbin/envabs.cgi?pdf=03-09955.pdf LA - English DB - ProQuest Environmental Science Collection N1 - Date revised - 2009-08-01 N1 - Document feature - |n 1 |t maps N1 - Last updated - 2011-12-15 N1 - SubjectsTermNotLitGenreText - DEFORESTATION; URBAN WATER RESOURCES; URBANIZATION; MONITORING, WATER; STREAMS; AQUATIC ECOSYSTEMS; WATER POLLUTION INDICATORS; WATER POLLUTION EFFECTS ER - TY - RPRT T1 - AEP 765-KV TRANSMISSION LINE CONSTRUCTION, JACKSONS FERRY, VIRGINIA TO OCEANA, WEST VIRGINIA (DRAFT SUPPLEMENT TO THE DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT OF JUNE 1996). AN - 36412746; 9284 AB - PURPOSE: The construction by the American Electric Power Company (AEP) of a 90-mile 765-kilovolt (kV) electric transmission line crossing 11 miles of federal land within a 200-foot right-of-way, located in central western Virginia and southern West Virginia, is proposed. The transmission line would affect lands under the jurisdiction of the Forest Service (the George Washington and Jefferson national forests), the National Park Service (the Appalachian National Scenic Trail), and the Army Corps of Engineers (the New River and R.D. Bailey Lake Flowage Easement Land). The line would help meet the anticipated demand for electric power in the region and increase system reliability. Issues of concern include the effects on water resources, cultural resources, human health and safety, air quality and noise, recreational trails and trail users, other recreational, social and economic resources, land use and land use plans, aesthetic and visual resources, plant and animal resources, and geology, soils, and minerals. Fourteen alternatives, including a No Action Alternative (Alternative 14, the preferred alternative of the Forest Service and the National Park Service; the Army Corps of Engineers has not identified an agency preferred alternative), were considered in the draft EIS of June 1996. This draft supplement considers six alternatives in details, including AEP's proposed route (Alternative 1), four route alternatives, and a No Action Alternative (Alternative 6). AEP's proposed transmission line route would extend 89.8 miles from Jackson Ferry, Virginia to Oceana, West Virginia. The other route alternatives would extend 89.7 to 89.9 miles, connecting the same termini. POSITIVE IMPACTS: Increased availability of electric power to AEP's service area would increase reliability and reduce outages and voltage drops, and could stimulate growth in the area, increasing employment, local expenditures, and increased tax revenues. Project construction would create 35 jobs on average, with a peak requirement of 100, increasing area construction-related income by $90.1 million. NEGATIVE IMPACTS: Irretrievable incompatibility with sensitive land uses and features would occur, such as the New River, the Appalachian Trail, and residences. The visual effects of the action alternatives would be high, adverse, and long-lasting, especially in such recreational areas as the Appalachian Trail, the New River, and various parks, mountains, lookouts, and highways. The National Park Service has determined that the adverse visual impacts of crossing the New River within the Wild and Scenic study area would be unacceptable. In addition, the proposed action would not comply with the Jefferson National Forest Land and Resource Management Plan, particularly as it would apply to visual resources. The action alternatives would adversely affect wildlife habitat, recreation, karst terrain, noise levels, soils resource, water resources, and vegetation. It could also adversely affect wetlands and floodplains, aquatic biological resources, land use, social and economic values, archaeological resources, cultural attachment, human health and safety, and federal and state proposed, endangered, threatened, and sensitive species and state heritage list species. LEGAL MANDATES: Endangered Species Act of 1973 (16 U.S.C. 668), Federal Land Policy and Management Act of 1976 (43 U.S.C. 1701 et seq.), Federal Water Pollution Control Act of 1972 (33 U.S.C. 1251 et seq.), National Trails System Act of 1968 (16 U.S.C. 1241 et seq.), River and Harbor Act of 1968 (33 U.S.C. 401). PRIOR REFERENCES: For the abstract of the draft EIS, see 96-0227D, Volume 20, Number 3. JF - EPA number: 020168, Volume 1 (Summary)--51 pages and maps, Volume II (Report)--327 pages and maps, Volume III (Report)--551 pages, Volume IV (Appendices)--473 pages, April 26, 2002 PY - 2002 KW - Energy KW - Air Quality KW - Biologic Assessments KW - Cultural Resources Assessments KW - Forests KW - Health Hazard Analyses KW - Impact Monitoring Plans KW - Land Use KW - Recreation KW - Rivers KW - Scenic Areas KW - Socioeconomic Assessments KW - Trails KW - Transmission Lines KW - Vegetation KW - Visual Resources KW - Water Resources KW - Wild and Scenic Rivers KW - Appalachian National Scenic Trail KW - George Washington National Forest KW - Guyandotte River KW - Jefferson National Forest KW - New River KW - Virginia KW - West Virginia KW - Federal Water Pollution Control Act of 1972, Permit Section 404 KW - Endangered Species Act of 1973, as amended, Compliance KW - Federal Land Policy and Management Act of 1976, Compliance KW - National Trails System Act of 1968, Compliance KW - River and Harbor Act of 1968, Project Authorization UR - http://libproxy.lib.unc.edu/login?url=http://search.proquest.com/docview/36412746?accountid=14244 L2 - http://vb3lk7eb4t.search.serialssolutions.com/?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&rfr_id=info:sid/Environmental+Impact+Statements%3A+Digests&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=report&rft.jtitle=&rft.atitle=&rft.au=&rft.aulast=&rft.aufirst=&rft.date=2002-04-26&rft.volume=&rft.issue=&rft.spage=&rft.isbn=&rft.btitle=AEP+765-KV+TRANSMISSION+LINE+CONSTRUCTION%2C+JACKSONS+FERRY%2C+VIRGINIA+TO+OCEANA%2C+WEST+VIRGINIA+%28DRAFT+SUPPLEMENT+TO+THE+DRAFT+ENVIRONMENTAL+IMPACT+STATEMENT+OF+JUNE+1996%29.&rft.title=AEP+765-KV+TRANSMISSION+LINE+CONSTRUCTION%2C+JACKSONS+FERRY%2C+VIRGINIA+TO+OCEANA%2C+WEST+VIRGINIA+%28DRAFT+SUPPLEMENT+TO+THE+DRAFT+ENVIRONMENTAL+IMPACT+STATEMENT+OF+JUNE+1996%29.&rft.issn=&rft_id=info:doi/ LA - English DB - ProQuest Environmental Science Collection N1 - Name - Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Roanoke, Virginia; DA N1 - Date revised - 2006-05-01 N1 - SuppNotes - Draft. Preparation date: April 26, 2002 N1 - Last updated - 2011-12-16 ER - TY - RPRT T1 - SMOKY CANYON MINE, PANELS B & C, CARIBOU-TARGHEE NATIONAL FOREST, IDAHO (FINAL SUPPLEMENT TO THE FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT OF 1982). AN - 36411074; 9273 AB - PURPOSE: The development of panels B and C at the J.R. Simplot Company's Smoky Canyon Mine in the Caribou-Targhee National Forest, Caribou County of southeastern Idaho is proposed. The impacts of the mine, which is located approximately 10 miles west of Afton, Wyoming, were reviewed in draft and final EISs issued in 1981 and 1982, respectively. The record of decision issued in 1983 permitted the development of the federal phosphate leases with five open-pit mine panels known as panels A, B, C, D, and E. The applicant's proposed action would involve development of two mine pits and the associated haul roads and overburden disposal areas. Approximately 93.77 million tons of overburden rock and phosphate ore would be excavated using standard open-pit methods over a 4.6-year period. The overburden would be used to backfill the new open pits as well as complete the backfilling of nearby Panel A. Remaining overburden would be placed in an external overburden disposal area located immediately south of Panel B on a ridge top. The two new panels and the external overburden disposal area would be located within the approximate boundaries of the facilities as described in the 1982 final EIS. Use of existing support and mill facilities would continue. These actions were included in 1983 record of decision for the entire mine. This final supplemental EIS reviews potential impacts from selenium and impacts to newly listed threatened, endangered, and sensitive species and updates previous impact analyses for other resources. Three alternatives to the proposed action, including a No Action Alternative, which would involve refusal to issue a permit to mine the two panels under consideration, are also addressed in the supplement. The preferred alternative (Alternative A) would include all components of the proposed action, but would eliminate disposal of seleniferous overburden within the external overburden disposal site. Non-seleniferus overburden would be paced in the external overburden disposal facility, which, due to that fact, would not require capping. POSITIVE IMPACTS: Mining would increase the supply of an important chemical product used for fertilizer and industrial purposes. Seleniferous overburden would be placed only in the pit backfills, which would cover 478 acres as compared to 722 acres under the applicant's proposal. NEGATIVE IMPACTS: Mining of the new panels under the preferred alternative would result in 618 acres of new disturbance of soil and the associated vegetation and wildlife habitat. Habitat for federally protected animal species, including bird species, would be affected by soil disturbances and possible releases of toxins. A small amount of wetland would be lost. Less than five percent of the Pole Canyon grazing allotment would be removed from grazing and hunting activities would be precluded during mining. Soil and other project-related disturbance would be extended by 10 months as compared to the applicant's proposal. New mining would require rehandling 13 percent of the overburden, compared to four percent for the proposed action. The economics of higher mining costs involved in this greater rehandling quantity would likely result in revisions to the mining plan to reduce the stripping ratio, yielding less recoverable phosphate. Seleniferous overburden could be leached by infiltration of precipitation and resulting infiltration from the bottom of the overburden fills would likely to have concentrations of cadmium, manganese, selenium, sulfate, and total dissolved solids in exceedence of groundwater quality standards. Visual impacts of the mining activities would also exceed standards for the national forest. LEGAL MANDATES: Federal Land Policy and Management Act of 1976 (43 U.S.C. 1701 et seq.), Federal Water Pollution Control Act of 1972 (33 U.S.C. 1251 et seq.), and National Forest Management Act of 1976 (16 U.S.C. 1600 et seq.). PRIOR REFERENCES: For the abstract of the draft supplemental EIS, see 01-0390D, Volume 25, Number 4. JF - EPA number: 020157, Final Supplemental EIS--13,017 pages and maps, April 23, 2002 PY - 2002 KW - Land Use KW - Agency number: FES 02-7 KW - Birds KW - Disposal KW - Endangered Species (Animals) KW - Forests KW - Geologic Surveys KW - Grazing KW - Hazardous Wastes KW - Hunting Management KW - Impact Assessment Methodology KW - Leasing KW - Mines KW - Mining KW - Vegetation KW - Visual Resources KW - Water Quality KW - Water Quality Assessments KW - Water Quality Standards Violations KW - Wildlife Habitat KW - Caribou-Targhee National Forest KW - Idaho KW - Federal Land Policy and Management Act of 1976, Compliance KW - Federal Water Pollution Control Act of 1972, Section 404 Permits KW - National Forest Management Act of 1976, Compliance UR - http://libproxy.lib.unc.edu/login?url=http://search.proquest.com/docview/36411074?accountid=14244 L2 - http://vb3lk7eb4t.search.serialssolutions.com/?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&rfr_id=info:sid/Environmental+Impact+Statements%3A+Digests&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=report&rft.jtitle=&rft.atitle=&rft.au=&rft.aulast=&rft.aufirst=&rft.date=2002-04-23&rft.volume=&rft.issue=&rft.spage=&rft.isbn=&rft.btitle=SMOKY+CANYON+MINE%2C+PANELS+B+%26+C%2C+CARIBOU-TARGHEE+NATIONAL+FOREST%2C+IDAHO+%28FINAL+SUPPLEMENT+TO+THE+FINAL+ENVIRONMENTAL+IMPACT+STATEMENT+OF+1982%29.&rft.title=SMOKY+CANYON+MINE%2C+PANELS+B+%26+C%2C+CARIBOU-TARGHEE+NATIONAL+FOREST%2C+IDAHO+%28FINAL+SUPPLEMENT+TO+THE+FINAL+ENVIRONMENTAL+IMPACT+STATEMENT+OF+1982%29.&rft.issn=&rft_id=info:doi/ LA - English DB - ProQuest Environmental Science Collection N1 - Name - Department of the Interior, Bureau of Land Management, Pocatello, Idaho; DA N1 - Date revised - 2006-05-01 N1 - SuppNotes - Final. Preparation date: April 23, 2002 N1 - Last updated - 2011-12-16 ER - TY - RPRT T1 - NEWMONT MINING CORPORATION'S SOUTH OPERATIONS AREA PROJECT AMENDMENT, ELK AND EUREKA COUNTIES, NEVADA. AN - 36416686; 9272 AB - PURPOSE: The issuance of a permit for continued mining and associated dewatering operations at Newmont Gold Corporation's South Operations Area in Elk and Eureka counties, Nevada is proposed. The South Operations Area consists of the Gold Quarry, Mac, and Tusc open-pit gold mines, as well as associated milling and watering, facilities located in northeastern Nevada approximately six miles northwest of Carlin. Newmont has been mining at this location since 1981. In 1993, the applicant implemented an extensive mitigation plan, which has proven effective in mitigating potential impacts and, in some cases, improving the environment in the vicinity of the mine. Four alternatives, including the applicant's proposed action, two modifications of the applicant's proposal, and a No Action Alternative, are considered in this final EIS. The applicant's proposal would provide for additional mining to a depth of approximately 350 feet below the currently approved operating level of the Gold Quarry mine; continuing to dewater the mine and discharge groundwater, at a rate no greater than 25,000 gallons per minute, directly into Maggie Creek six miles above its confluence with the Humboldt River; expanding waste rock disposal facilities and leach facilities, and constructing associated ancillary facilities. POSITIVE IMPACTS: Several million ounces of gold would be mined, contributing significantly to the national stocks of this precious metal. Backfilling the Mac pit would reduce the extent of waste rock disposal facilities required by six acres. Mining operations would continue to employ local workers and provide tax revenues to the affected counties. NEGATIVE IMPACTS: Total incremental disturbance under the preferred alternative would affect 1,392 acres of soils and vegetation and the associated wildlife habitat and recreational opportunities, though 1,253 acres would be reclaimed. Approximately 526 million tons of waste rock and ore would be removed from the Gold Quarry pit and dumped at rock disposal facilities, at leach processing facilities, at a tailings facility, or in the Mac pit, altering the topography and landscape of the affected sites. One sinkhole has been documented in the area affected by the Gold Quarry mine. Areas identified as susceptible to sinkhole development include the large area underlain by carbonate rock located north of the Gold Quarry pit. Approximately 495,000 acre-feet of groundwater would be removed through dewatering concurrent with mining activities, causing further decline in groundwater levels, incremental reduction of flows in or complete loss of springs. Five springs and seep sites would be likely to be affected. Two streams would experience loss of reduction or elimination of baseflow both during and after dewatering, affecting aquatic habitat and fisheries and 3.39 acres of wetland. Loss of baseflow and loss of the springs and seeps would affect three livestock grazing allotments. Discharges to Maggie Creek would increase the extent of the associated floodplain and water quality degradation could affect Lahontan cutthroat trout, a federally protected species. LEGAL MANDATES: Federal Land Policy and Management Act of 1976 (43 U.S.C. 1701 et seq.) and Mineral and Mining Policy Act of 1970 (30 U.S.C. 21a). PRIOR REFERENCES: For the abstract of the draft EIS, see 00-358D, Volume 24, Number 4. JF - EPA number: 020156, Final EIS 541 pages and maps; Comments and Responses--295 pages, April 19, 2002 PY - 2002 KW - Land Use KW - Agency number: BLM/EL/PL-00/015+1793.4 KW - Creeks KW - Employment KW - Endangered Species (Animals) KW - Fish KW - Impact Assessment Methodology KW - Metals KW - Mineral Resources KW - Mining KW - Reclamation KW - Recreation Resources KW - Soils KW - Streams KW - Vegetation KW - Visual Resources KW - Visual Resources Surveys KW - Waste Disposal KW - Water Quality KW - Wetlands KW - Wildlife Habitat KW - Nevada KW - Federal Land Policy and Management Act of 1976, Compliance KW - Mining and Mineral Policy Act of 1970, Compliance UR - http://libproxy.lib.unc.edu/login?url=http://search.proquest.com/docview/36416686?accountid=14244 L2 - http://vb3lk7eb4t.search.serialssolutions.com/?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&rfr_id=info:sid/Environmental+Impact+Statements%3A+Digests&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=report&rft.jtitle=&rft.atitle=&rft.au=&rft.aulast=&rft.aufirst=&rft.date=2002-04-19&rft.volume=&rft.issue=&rft.spage=&rft.isbn=&rft.btitle=NEWMONT+MINING+CORPORATION%27S+SOUTH+OPERATIONS+AREA+PROJECT+AMENDMENT%2C+ELK+AND+EUREKA+COUNTIES%2C+NEVADA.&rft.title=NEWMONT+MINING+CORPORATION%27S+SOUTH+OPERATIONS+AREA+PROJECT+AMENDMENT%2C+ELK+AND+EUREKA+COUNTIES%2C+NEVADA.&rft.issn=&rft_id=info:doi/ LA - English DB - ProQuest Environmental Science Collection N1 - Name - Department of the Interior, Bureau of Land Management, Elko, Nevada; DOI N1 - Date revised - 2006-05-01 N1 - SuppNotes - Final. Preparation date: April 19, 2002 N1 - Last updated - 2011-12-16 ER - TY - RPRT T1 - NATIONAL COAL HERITAGE AREA MANAGEMENT ACTION PLAN, BOONE, CABELL, FAYETTE, LOGAN, MCDOWELL, MERCER, MINGO, RALEIGH, SUMMERS, WAYNE, and WYOMING COUNTIES WEST VIRGINIA. AN - 36416304; 9264 AB - PURPOSE: The establishment of a strategic management plan for the National Coal Heritage Area in 11 counties in southern West Virginia is proposed. The area, which encompasses over 5,000 square miles, includes Boone, Cabell, Fayette, Logan, McDowell, Mercer, Mingo, Raleigh, Summers, Wayne, and Wyoming counties. The area is bordered on the southwest by the Kentucky state line, on the southeast by the Virginia state line, and on the south by other counties in West Virginia. Additionally, a small portion of the area borders the Ohio state line near Huntington, West Virginia. The area is characterized by some of the most rugged topography of any area in West Virginia, where the landscape, culture, and history of the region were altered significantly due to the extraction and transportation of bituminous coal. The area has undergone a boom-and-bust economy over the last century due to fluctuations in the coal mining market. Currently the area has a per capita income that is significantly less than the national average and an unemployment rate that is significantly higher. Four alternatives, including a No Action Alternative (Alternative D), are considered in this draft EIS. All action alternatives would provide for the continuation of conservation, preservation and interpretation activities, protection of physical and cultural resources, partnering and community agency cooperation, improvements to public access, marketing activities, and creation of a central organizational entity to provide the management and oversight necessary to raise funds and implement the plan. Alternative A, the environmentally preferred alternative, would provide for linkages of cultural resources along transportation routes in the form of visitor and destination centers and experience zones. Alternative B would provide for development of a single, large-scale visitor and interpretive center located at the region's transportation crossroads at the intersection of Interstate 77 (I-77) and I-64. Alternative C, the agency's preferred alternative, would constitute a combination of alternatives A and B. POSITIVE IMPACTS: The agency's preferred alternative would best meet the intent of the legislation establishing the National Coal Heritage Area, which is to develop and implement integrated cultural, historic, and land resource management policies and programs to retain, enhance, and interpret significant values of the lands, water, and structures of the area. Alternative C would provide visitors several options for exploring the 11-county area and provide for a strong central leadership structure. The plan would also improve employment levels and other economic indicators in the area. NEGATIVE IMPACTS: Alternative C would result in some degradation of historic and archaeological resources due to disturbance by visitors, as visitation rates would increase significantly. Increase visitor levels would also increase traffic on roads serving the area. The plan could impair the historic integrity of the visitor center and the associated museum. Construction of the visitor center and destination centers could damage natural resources and cause land use conflicts. Facilities could also mar visual aesthetics in the area. LEGAL MANDATES: Omnibus Public Lands and Natural Forest Adjustments Act (P.L. 100-699). JF - EPA number: 020148, 171 pages, April 16, 2002 PY - 2002 KW - Parks, Refuges and Forests KW - Agency number: DES 02-16 KW - Archaeological Sites KW - Coal KW - Land Management KW - Land Use KW - National Parks KW - Cultural Resources KW - Cultural Resources Surveys KW - Employment KW - Historic Districts KW - Mining KW - Museums KW - Visual Resources KW - Water Quality Assessments KW - Wildlife Surveys KW - West Virginia KW - National Coal Heritage Area KW - National Coal Heritage Area Act of 1996, Project Authorization KW - Omnibus Public Lands and Natural Forest Adjustments Act, Project Authorization UR - http://libproxy.lib.unc.edu/login?url=http://search.proquest.com/docview/36416304?accountid=14244 L2 - http://vb3lk7eb4t.search.serialssolutions.com/?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&rfr_id=info:sid/Environmental+Impact+Statements%3A+Digests&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=report&rft.jtitle=&rft.atitle=&rft.au=&rft.aulast=&rft.aufirst=&rft.date=2002-04-16&rft.volume=&rft.issue=&rft.spage=&rft.isbn=&rft.btitle=NATIONAL+COAL+HERITAGE+AREA+MANAGEMENT+ACTION+PLAN%2C+BOONE%2C+CABELL%2C+FAYETTE%2C+LOGAN%2C+MCDOWELL%2C+MERCER%2C+MINGO%2C+RALEIGH%2C+SUMMERS%2C+WAYNE%2C+and+WYOMING+COUNTIES+WEST+VIRGINIA.&rft.title=NATIONAL+COAL+HERITAGE+AREA+MANAGEMENT+ACTION+PLAN%2C+BOONE%2C+CABELL%2C+FAYETTE%2C+LOGAN%2C+MCDOWELL%2C+MERCER%2C+MINGO%2C+RALEIGH%2C+SUMMERS%2C+WAYNE%2C+and+WYOMING+COUNTIES+WEST+VIRGINIA.&rft.issn=&rft_id=info:doi/ LA - English DB - ProQuest Environmental Science Collection N1 - Name - Department of the Interior, National Park Service, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania; DOI N1 - Date revised - 2006-05-01 N1 - SuppNotes - Draft. Preparation date: April 16, 2002 N1 - Last updated - 2011-12-16 ER - TY - RPRT T1 - GRAND STAIRCASE-ESCALANTE NATIONAL MONUMENT, KANAB, UTAH: 3R MINERALS COAL BED CANYON MINE. AN - 36413012; 9262 AB - PURPOSE: The approval of a Notice of Intent to Revise Mining Operations, submitted to the Bureau of Land Management (BLM) by 3R Minerals in 1999, in relation to the excavation and processing of zirconium and titanium sands in Alvey Wash, Garfield County, Utah is proposed. The mine site is located four miles southwest of the town of Escalante at the junction of Alvey Wash, Coal Bed Canyon, and Alvey Wash Road. The modifications would include a 100-foot by 150-foot area, located adjacent to the wash, which would be graded for a pad and processing facility. This area would be covered by three to four inches of gravel. The pad would accommodate the processing facility along with a personnel/security trailer, vehicle parking and loading areas, water well, water storage pond, topsoil storage area, concentrate and tailings piles, and a diesel generator. The diesel generator would be the source of power for all equipment and facilities related to mining. The graveled area would be fenced in order to provide security for equipment. The pad would be located near the road and away from the active wash bottom. Alluvial sands containing titanium and zirconium would be excavated from the active wash bottom of Alvey Wash. Excavated sand would be transported to the fenced processing pad to be screened to remove oversized material. After the sized material passed through the screening deck, it would be conveyed to a tank where it would be mixed with water to create a slurry. The slurry would then be run through a bank of approximately 34 gravity spiral separators to segregate the waste material (sand containing quartz) and other light materials from the ore concentrate via gravity; this represents the standard technology. Water would be decanted off the materials leaving one storage pile of waste material and one storage pile of concentrate. Approximately 90 percent of the water used would be recycled into a lined storage pond, which would have a diameter of 20 feet and a depth of five feet. Processing water would be provided by a new on-site well. Oversized material from the screening process and light materials from the spiral separators would be placed back into the open excavations. The concentrated sands would be loaded onto haul trucks and transported to the Iron Springs load out at Ceder City, where the sands would be placed on the Union Pacific Rail Line. Two to five workers would be employed at the site. Mining activity would be conducted during good weather months, approximately 130 to 150 days per year. At this time, the duration of the mine operation cannot be estimated due to the possibility of mineral regeneration during flash flooding events. Reclamation activities would be concurrent with mining operations. Over sized material and unwanted light sand fractions would be returned to the streambed as mining proceeded. The pad would be reclaimed at the end of the project, all equipment and fencing would be removed, the site would be graded and seeded, and the well plugged. In addition to the proposed action (Alternative A), outlined above, three other alternatives, including a No Action Alternative (Alternative C), which would deny approval of the notice, are considered in this final EIS. The preferred alternative (Alternative B) would involve minor modifications to the applicant's proposal to promote public safety and reduce environmental impacts. Alternative D would prohibit mining in the wash altogether. POSITIVE IMPACTS: Approval of the Notice of Intent under the preferred would allow efficient removal of zirconium and titanium from the wash bottom sands, providing economic benefits to the applicant and increasing the supply of these rare metals. The project would also increase the knowledge base concerning mineral occurrence and provide an opportunity to study reclamation and recovery of disturbed sites. NEGATIVE IMPACTS: The revised mine plan would result in the disturbance of 4.8 acres of habitat, including an excavation area extending 880 feet at a width of 180 feet in the active wash bottom of Alvey Wash. The disturbed area would occur within a Utah Wilderness Inventory Unit and two BLM Wilderness Inventory Units. Surface disturbance would increase the risk of encroachment by non-native plant species. Noise generated by equipment would exceed federal standards for outdoor areas within 2,600 feet of the site. Trucks hauling waste from the site would generate noise, affecting local communities. Noise would also affect nesting raptors. Use of the water well would result in localized drawdown of the groundwater table, though other users would not be affected. The visual impact of the project would exceed federal standards. The visual and noise impacts of the project would degrade recreational experiences in the vicinity of the wash, including within the Smoky Mountain Scenic Backway. LEGAL MANDATES: Federal Land Policy and Management Act of 1976 (43 U.S.C. 1701 et seq.) and Utah Schools and Lands Exchange Act of 1998 (P.L. 105-335). PRIOR REFERENCES: For the abstract of the draft EIS, see 00-0362D, Volume 24, Number 4. JF - EPA number: 020146, 237 pages, April 10, 2002 PY - 2002 KW - Parks, Refuges and Forests KW - Agency number: BLM/UT/GI-00/08+1330 KW - Birds KW - Creeks KW - Metals KW - Mining KW - Noise Standards Violations KW - Recreation Resources KW - Research KW - Scenic Areas KW - Tailings KW - Vegetation KW - Visual Resources KW - Wells KW - Wilderness KW - Wildlife Habitat KW - Wildlife Surveys KW - Grand Staircase-Escalante National Monument KW - Utah KW - Federal Land Policy and Management Act of 1976, Compliance KW - Utah Schools and Lands Exchange Act of 1998, Compliance UR - http://libproxy.lib.unc.edu/login?url=http://search.proquest.com/docview/36413012?accountid=14244 L2 - http://vb3lk7eb4t.search.serialssolutions.com/?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&rfr_id=info:sid/Environmental+Impact+Statements%3A+Digests&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=report&rft.jtitle=&rft.atitle=&rft.au=&rft.aulast=&rft.aufirst=&rft.date=2002-04-10&rft.volume=&rft.issue=&rft.spage=&rft.isbn=&rft.btitle=GRAND+STAIRCASE-ESCALANTE+NATIONAL+MONUMENT%2C+KANAB%2C+UTAH%3A+3R+MINERALS+COAL+BED+CANYON+MINE.&rft.title=GRAND+STAIRCASE-ESCALANTE+NATIONAL+MONUMENT%2C+KANAB%2C+UTAH%3A+3R+MINERALS+COAL+BED+CANYON+MINE.&rft.issn=&rft_id=info:doi/ LA - English DB - ProQuest Environmental Science Collection N1 - Name - Department of the Interior, Bureau of Land Management, Salt Lake City, Utah; DOI N1 - Date revised - 2006-05-01 N1 - SuppNotes - Final. Preparation date: April 10, 2002 N1 - Last updated - 2011-12-16 ER - TY - RPRT T1 - TRAINING RANGE FOR THE MONTANA AIR NATIONAL GUARD IN BLAINE OR PHILLIPS COUNTY, MONTANA. AN - 36412121; 9256 AB - PURPOSE: The development of an air-to-ground training range in Blaine or Phillips County, Montana is proposed by the Air National Guard. The new training range would support the 120th Fighter Wing of the Montana National Guard that flies F-16 aircrafts based at Great Falls International Airport. The range would be approximately three miles by five miles in size and used for air-to-ground training with inert (nonexplosive) training munitions. The training targets would be located within a one-square-mile area near the center of the range. The remainder of the training range would serve as a safety buffer zone. Components of the proposed action would include airspace modification, increased aircraft activities in the existing airspace, use of inert training munitions, use of laser targeting systems and mobile truck-mounted electronic emitters, and ground activities, including new infrastructure, targets, roads, and firebreaks. No full-scale explosive munitions would be used. As a result of a systematic siting process and input from the public, a No Action Alternative and three location alternatives are carried forward for detailed consideration in this final EIS. Alternative 1 would be located in Blaine County. Each action alternative would be equally viable from an operational standpoint. Alternatives 2 and 3 would be located in Phillips County. The preferred alternative is Alternative 1, which has been adjusted with respect to location due to cultural concerns expressed by the Fort Belknap Indian Community. POSITIVE IMPACTS: The proposed action would improve the current air-to-ground training efficiency for the 120th Fighter Wing. Use of the local training range would increase training time as opposed to time spent flying to more distant ranges, thereby enhancing training effectiveness, and reduce the distance traveled to conduct air-to-ground training, thereby resulting in potential cost savings. The location of the training range under the preferred alternative would have positive socioeconomic impact with respect to the local communities. NEGATIVE IMPACTS: Use of the training area could have impacts on wildlife habitat. Aircraft noise within the airspace would affect local populations of humans and wildlife. Approximately 40 acres of previously disturbed grassland would be affected by construction activities. PRIOR REFERENCES: For the abstract of the draft EIS, see 01-0363D, Volume 25, Number 4. JF - EPA number: 020139, Volume I--319 pages, Volume II-329 pages, April 5, 2002 PY - 2002 KW - Air Transportation KW - Aircraft KW - Aircraft Noise KW - Air Quality KW - Biologic Assessments KW - Cultural Resources KW - Indian Reservations KW - Land Use KW - Military Facilities (Air Force) KW - Military Operations (Air Force) KW - Ranges KW - Safety KW - Socioeconomic Assessments KW - Visual Resources KW - Water Resources KW - Wildlife Habitat KW - Montana UR - http://libproxy.lib.unc.edu/login?url=http://search.proquest.com/docview/36412121?accountid=14244 L2 - http://vb3lk7eb4t.search.serialssolutions.com/?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&rfr_id=info:sid/Environmental+Impact+Statements%3A+Digests&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=report&rft.jtitle=&rft.atitle=&rft.au=&rft.aulast=&rft.aufirst=&rft.date=2002-04-05&rft.volume=&rft.issue=&rft.spage=&rft.isbn=&rft.btitle=TRAINING+RANGE+FOR+THE+MONTANA+AIR+NATIONAL+GUARD+IN+BLAINE+OR+PHILLIPS+COUNTY%2C+MONTANA.&rft.title=TRAINING+RANGE+FOR+THE+MONTANA+AIR+NATIONAL+GUARD+IN+BLAINE+OR+PHILLIPS+COUNTY%2C+MONTANA.&rft.issn=&rft_id=info:doi/ LA - English DB - ProQuest Environmental Science Collection N1 - Name - Air National Guard, Andrews Air Force Base, Maryland; ANG N1 - Date revised - 2006-05-01 N1 - SuppNotes - Final. Preparation date: April 5, 2002 N1 - Last updated - 2011-12-16 ER - TY - RPRT T1 - WHITE RIVER AMPHITHEATRE, THE MUCKLESHOOT INDIAN RESERVATION, KINGS COUNTY, WASHINGTON STATE. AN - 36441602; 9255 AB - PURPOSE: The Muckleshoot Indian Tribe proposes to construct a 20,000-seat open-air amphitheatre on the Muckleshoot Indian Reservation in the western (Seattle-Tacoma) area of Washington State. The Seattle-Tacoma area is one of five metropolitan areas with a population of over 2.0 million lacking a large outdoor amphitheatre. The Muckleshoot Tribe, which currently has approximately 1,600 enrolled members, is located on the six-square-mile Muckleshoot Indian Reservation, approximately 25 miles southeast of Seattle between the cities of Auburn and Enumclaw. The Tribe and Bill Graham Presents (BGP) entered into a management agreement that provides that the Tribe would own and BGP would manage the facilities. Construction began in 1997, but was suspended in July 1998 to allow the Bureau of Indian Affairs, the Army Corps of Engineers, and the Washington Department of Transportation to conduct further environmental reviews. Five alternatives, including the No Action Alternative (Alternative 1), are considered in this final EIS. In addition to the 20,000-seat amphitheatre proposed by the Tribe, action alternatives include development of a gravel quarry along with the amphitheatre, construction of a 10,000-seat amphitheatre, and restoration of the current construction site following removal of the unfinished facilities. The Tribes proposal would locate the facility on a 95-acre tract bounded by State Route 164 on the east, Southeast 408th Street on the south, the White River bluffs on the west, and Southeast 404th Street on the north. Approximately 45 acres within the site has already been developed toward the completion of the amphitheatre facilities, including partial construction of the amphitheatre and complete construction of a stormwater pond. The approximately 45 acres of undisturbed area on the site consist of undeveloped grassland. With respect to the entire site, approximately 70 acres would be converted to structures and surface parking for 6,322 to 7,300 vehicles, while the remaining 25 acres would be devoted to landscaping and buffers, including a shielding berm along the southern boundary. Support facilities would include a ticket and administrative office, public rest rooms, concession stands, cafes, a center bar, a loading dock, and a hospitality area for performers. The Canoe Lodge, to be located within the complex, would be used for Tribal meetings and small events and as a restaurant during concert events. Completion of the amphitheatre would require seven months, plus an additional two to three months for start-up and owner equipment setup. All facilities would be completed by the spring of 2001, ready for operation during the summer 2001 concert season. The facility would provide a venue for 30 to 40 concerts per year. POSITIVE IMPACTS: The economically competitive performing arts center would serve the greater Seattle-Tacoma concert market and provide for cultural and educational events and community gatherings and events for the Tribe. The amphitheatre would also provide additional revenues for the Tribe, which has suffered due to declining federal funding in recent years. Newly created jobs would ease unemployment among Tribe members. NEGATIVE IMPACTS: Unless removed and reclaimed, the facility would displace grassland, constituting the chief land use of the site. Less than 0.33 acres of wetlands would be filled, and this impact would be mitigated by the creation of approximately 1.5 acres of wetlands on the site. Noise and light and glare during use of the facility would constitute a minor impact. Traffic levels generated by concerts and other events would constitute a major impact. LEGAL MANDATES: Federal Water Pollution Control Act of 1972 (33 U.S.C. 1251 et seq.). PRIOR REFERENCES: For the abstract of the draft EIS, see 99-0419D, Volume 23, Number 4. JF - EPA number: 020138, Volume I--631 pages and maps, Volume IIA--722 pages and maps, Volume IIB--867 pages and maps, Volume IIIA--557 pages, Volume IIIB--535 pages, April 4, 2002 PY - 2002 KW - Urban and Social Programs KW - Air Quality Assessments KW - Biologic Assessments KW - Cultural Resources KW - Employment KW - Geologic Assessments KW - Gravel KW - Indian Reservations KW - Noise Assessments KW - Quarries KW - Recreation Facilities KW - Socioeconomic Assessments KW - Traffic Analyses KW - Transportation Surveys KW - Vegetation KW - Wetlands KW - Muckleshoot Indian Reservation KW - Washington KW - Federal Water Pollution Control Act of 1972, NPDES Permits UR - http://libproxy.lib.unc.edu/login?url=http://search.proquest.com/docview/36441602?accountid=14244 L2 - http://vb3lk7eb4t.search.serialssolutions.com/?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&rfr_id=info:sid/Environmental+Impact+Statements%3A+Digests&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=report&rft.jtitle=&rft.atitle=&rft.au=&rft.aulast=&rft.aufirst=D&rft.date=2001-01-01&rft.volume=&rft.issue=&rft.spage=&rft.isbn=&rft.btitle=Debris+Avalanche+at+Forest+Falls%2C+San+Bernardino+County%2C+California%2C+July+11%2C+1999.+Version+1.0&rft.title=Debris+Avalanche+at+Forest+Falls%2C+San+Bernardino+County%2C+California%2C+July+11%2C+1999.+Version+1.0&rft.issn=&rft_id=info:doi/ LA - English DB - ProQuest Environmental Science Collection N1 - Name - Department of the Interior, Bureau of Indian Affairs, Portland, Oregon; DOI N1 - Date revised - 2006-05-01 N1 - SuppNotes - Final. Preparation date: April 4, 2002 N1 - Last updated - 2011-12-16 ER - TY - RPRT T1 - WHITE RIVER AMPHITHEATRE, THE MUCKLESHOOT INDIAN RESERVATION, KINGS COUNTY, WASHINGTON STATE. [Part 4 of 4] T2 - WHITE RIVER AMPHITHEATRE, THE MUCKLESHOOT INDIAN RESERVATION, KINGS COUNTY, WASHINGTON STATE. AN - 36378343; 9255-020138_0004 AB - PURPOSE: The Muckleshoot Indian Tribe proposes to construct a 20,000-seat open-air amphitheatre on the Muckleshoot Indian Reservation in the western (Seattle-Tacoma) area of Washington State. The Seattle-Tacoma area is one of five metropolitan areas with a population of over 2.0 million lacking a large outdoor amphitheatre. The Muckleshoot Tribe, which currently has approximately 1,600 enrolled members, is located on the six-square-mile Muckleshoot Indian Reservation, approximately 25 miles southeast of Seattle between the cities of Auburn and Enumclaw. The Tribe and Bill Graham Presents (BGP) entered into a management agreement that provides that the Tribe would own and BGP would manage the facilities. Construction began in 1997, but was suspended in July 1998 to allow the Bureau of Indian Affairs, the Army Corps of Engineers, and the Washington Department of Transportation to conduct further environmental reviews. Five alternatives, including the No Action Alternative (Alternative 1), are considered in this final EIS. In addition to the 20,000-seat amphitheatre proposed by the Tribe, action alternatives include development of a gravel quarry along with the amphitheatre, construction of a 10,000-seat amphitheatre, and restoration of the current construction site following removal of the unfinished facilities. The Tribes proposal would locate the facility on a 95-acre tract bounded by State Route 164 on the east, Southeast 408th Street on the south, the White River bluffs on the west, and Southeast 404th Street on the north. Approximately 45 acres within the site has already been developed toward the completion of the amphitheatre facilities, including partial construction of the amphitheatre and complete construction of a stormwater pond. The approximately 45 acres of undisturbed area on the site consist of undeveloped grassland. With respect to the entire site, approximately 70 acres would be converted to structures and surface parking for 6,322 to 7,300 vehicles, while the remaining 25 acres would be devoted to landscaping and buffers, including a shielding berm along the southern boundary. Support facilities would include a ticket and administrative office, public rest rooms, concession stands, cafes, a center bar, a loading dock, and a hospitality area for performers. The Canoe Lodge, to be located within the complex, would be used for Tribal meetings and small events and as a restaurant during concert events. Completion of the amphitheatre would require seven months, plus an additional two to three months for start-up and owner equipment setup. All facilities would be completed by the spring of 2001, ready for operation during the summer 2001 concert season. The facility would provide a venue for 30 to 40 concerts per year. POSITIVE IMPACTS: The economically competitive performing arts center would serve the greater Seattle-Tacoma concert market and provide for cultural and educational events and community gatherings and events for the Tribe. The amphitheatre would also provide additional revenues for the Tribe, which has suffered due to declining federal funding in recent years. Newly created jobs would ease unemployment among Tribe members. NEGATIVE IMPACTS: Unless removed and reclaimed, the facility would displace grassland, constituting the chief land use of the site. Less than 0.33 acres of wetlands would be filled, and this impact would be mitigated by the creation of approximately 1.5 acres of wetlands on the site. Noise and light and glare during use of the facility would constitute a minor impact. Traffic levels generated by concerts and other events would constitute a major impact. LEGAL MANDATES: Federal Water Pollution Control Act of 1972 (33 U.S.C. 1251 et seq.). PRIOR REFERENCES: For the abstract of the draft EIS, see 99-0419D, Volume 23, Number 4. JF - EPA number: 020138, Volume I--631 pages and maps, Volume IIA--722 pages and maps, Volume IIB--867 pages and maps, Volume IIIA--557 pages, Volume IIIB--535 pages, April 4, 2002 PY - 2002 VL - 4 KW - Urban and Social Programs KW - Air Quality Assessments KW - Biologic Assessments KW - Cultural Resources KW - Employment KW - Geologic Assessments KW - Gravel KW - Indian Reservations KW - Noise Assessments KW - Quarries KW - Recreation Facilities KW - Socioeconomic Assessments KW - Traffic Analyses KW - Transportation Surveys KW - Vegetation KW - Wetlands KW - Muckleshoot Indian Reservation KW - Washington KW - Federal Water Pollution Control Act of 1972, NPDES Permits UR - http://libproxy.lib.unc.edu/login?url=http://search.proquest.com/docview/36378343?accountid=14244 L2 - http://vb3lk7eb4t.search.serialssolutions.com/?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&rfr_id=info:sid/Environmental+Impact+Statements%3A+Full+Text&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=report&rft.jtitle=&rft.atitle=&rft.au=&rft.aulast=&rft.aufirst=&rft.date=2002-04-04&rft.volume=&rft.issue=&rft.spage=&rft.isbn=&rft.btitle=WHITE+RIVER+AMPHITHEATRE%2C+THE+MUCKLESHOOT+INDIAN+RESERVATION%2C+KINGS+COUNTY%2C+WASHINGTON+STATE.&rft.title=WHITE+RIVER+AMPHITHEATRE%2C+THE+MUCKLESHOOT+INDIAN+RESERVATION%2C+KINGS+COUNTY%2C+WASHINGTON+STATE.&rft.issn=&rft_id=info:doi/ LA - English DB - ProQuest Environmental Science Collection N1 - Name - Department of the Interior, Bureau of Indian Affairs, Portland, Oregon; DOI N1 - Date revised - 2006-05-01 N1 - SuppNotes - Final. Preparation date: April 4, 2002 N1 - Last updated - 2011-12-16 ER - TY - RPRT T1 - WHITE RIVER AMPHITHEATRE, THE MUCKLESHOOT INDIAN RESERVATION, KINGS COUNTY, WASHINGTON STATE. [Part 1 of 4] T2 - WHITE RIVER AMPHITHEATRE, THE MUCKLESHOOT INDIAN RESERVATION, KINGS COUNTY, WASHINGTON STATE. AN - 36378135; 9255-020138_0001 AB - PURPOSE: The Muckleshoot Indian Tribe proposes to construct a 20,000-seat open-air amphitheatre on the Muckleshoot Indian Reservation in the western (Seattle-Tacoma) area of Washington State. The Seattle-Tacoma area is one of five metropolitan areas with a population of over 2.0 million lacking a large outdoor amphitheatre. The Muckleshoot Tribe, which currently has approximately 1,600 enrolled members, is located on the six-square-mile Muckleshoot Indian Reservation, approximately 25 miles southeast of Seattle between the cities of Auburn and Enumclaw. The Tribe and Bill Graham Presents (BGP) entered into a management agreement that provides that the Tribe would own and BGP would manage the facilities. Construction began in 1997, but was suspended in July 1998 to allow the Bureau of Indian Affairs, the Army Corps of Engineers, and the Washington Department of Transportation to conduct further environmental reviews. Five alternatives, including the No Action Alternative (Alternative 1), are considered in this final EIS. In addition to the 20,000-seat amphitheatre proposed by the Tribe, action alternatives include development of a gravel quarry along with the amphitheatre, construction of a 10,000-seat amphitheatre, and restoration of the current construction site following removal of the unfinished facilities. The Tribes proposal would locate the facility on a 95-acre tract bounded by State Route 164 on the east, Southeast 408th Street on the south, the White River bluffs on the west, and Southeast 404th Street on the north. Approximately 45 acres within the site has already been developed toward the completion of the amphitheatre facilities, including partial construction of the amphitheatre and complete construction of a stormwater pond. The approximately 45 acres of undisturbed area on the site consist of undeveloped grassland. With respect to the entire site, approximately 70 acres would be converted to structures and surface parking for 6,322 to 7,300 vehicles, while the remaining 25 acres would be devoted to landscaping and buffers, including a shielding berm along the southern boundary. Support facilities would include a ticket and administrative office, public rest rooms, concession stands, cafes, a center bar, a loading dock, and a hospitality area for performers. The Canoe Lodge, to be located within the complex, would be used for Tribal meetings and small events and as a restaurant during concert events. Completion of the amphitheatre would require seven months, plus an additional two to three months for start-up and owner equipment setup. All facilities would be completed by the spring of 2001, ready for operation during the summer 2001 concert season. The facility would provide a venue for 30 to 40 concerts per year. POSITIVE IMPACTS: The economically competitive performing arts center would serve the greater Seattle-Tacoma concert market and provide for cultural and educational events and community gatherings and events for the Tribe. The amphitheatre would also provide additional revenues for the Tribe, which has suffered due to declining federal funding in recent years. Newly created jobs would ease unemployment among Tribe members. NEGATIVE IMPACTS: Unless removed and reclaimed, the facility would displace grassland, constituting the chief land use of the site. Less than 0.33 acres of wetlands would be filled, and this impact would be mitigated by the creation of approximately 1.5 acres of wetlands on the site. Noise and light and glare during use of the facility would constitute a minor impact. Traffic levels generated by concerts and other events would constitute a major impact. LEGAL MANDATES: Federal Water Pollution Control Act of 1972 (33 U.S.C. 1251 et seq.). PRIOR REFERENCES: For the abstract of the draft EIS, see 99-0419D, Volume 23, Number 4. JF - EPA number: 020138, Volume I--631 pages and maps, Volume IIA--722 pages and maps, Volume IIB--867 pages and maps, Volume IIIA--557 pages, Volume IIIB--535 pages, April 4, 2002 PY - 2002 VL - 1 KW - Urban and Social Programs KW - Air Quality Assessments KW - Biologic Assessments KW - Cultural Resources KW - Employment KW - Geologic Assessments KW - Gravel KW - Indian Reservations KW - Noise Assessments KW - Quarries KW - Recreation Facilities KW - Socioeconomic Assessments KW - Traffic Analyses KW - Transportation Surveys KW - Vegetation KW - Wetlands KW - Muckleshoot Indian Reservation KW - Washington KW - Federal Water Pollution Control Act of 1972, NPDES Permits UR - http://libproxy.lib.unc.edu/login?url=http://search.proquest.com/docview/36378135?accountid=14244 L2 - http://vb3lk7eb4t.search.serialssolutions.com/?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&rfr_id=info:sid/Environmental+Impact+Statements%3A+Full+Text&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=report&rft.jtitle=&rft.atitle=&rft.au=&rft.aulast=&rft.aufirst=&rft.date=2002-04-04&rft.volume=&rft.issue=&rft.spage=&rft.isbn=&rft.btitle=WHITE+RIVER+AMPHITHEATRE%2C+THE+MUCKLESHOOT+INDIAN+RESERVATION%2C+KINGS+COUNTY%2C+WASHINGTON+STATE.&rft.title=WHITE+RIVER+AMPHITHEATRE%2C+THE+MUCKLESHOOT+INDIAN+RESERVATION%2C+KINGS+COUNTY%2C+WASHINGTON+STATE.&rft.issn=&rft_id=info:doi/ LA - English DB - ProQuest Environmental Science Collection N1 - Name - Department of the Interior, Bureau of Indian Affairs, Portland, Oregon; DOI N1 - Date revised - 2006-05-01 N1 - SuppNotes - Final. Preparation date: April 4, 2002 N1 - Last updated - 2011-12-16 ER - TY - RPRT T1 - WHITE RIVER AMPHITHEATRE, THE MUCKLESHOOT INDIAN RESERVATION, KINGS COUNTY, WASHINGTON STATE. [Part 3 of 4] T2 - WHITE RIVER AMPHITHEATRE, THE MUCKLESHOOT INDIAN RESERVATION, KINGS COUNTY, WASHINGTON STATE. AN - 36377828; 9255-020138_0003 AB - PURPOSE: The Muckleshoot Indian Tribe proposes to construct a 20,000-seat open-air amphitheatre on the Muckleshoot Indian Reservation in the western (Seattle-Tacoma) area of Washington State. The Seattle-Tacoma area is one of five metropolitan areas with a population of over 2.0 million lacking a large outdoor amphitheatre. The Muckleshoot Tribe, which currently has approximately 1,600 enrolled members, is located on the six-square-mile Muckleshoot Indian Reservation, approximately 25 miles southeast of Seattle between the cities of Auburn and Enumclaw. The Tribe and Bill Graham Presents (BGP) entered into a management agreement that provides that the Tribe would own and BGP would manage the facilities. Construction began in 1997, but was suspended in July 1998 to allow the Bureau of Indian Affairs, the Army Corps of Engineers, and the Washington Department of Transportation to conduct further environmental reviews. Five alternatives, including the No Action Alternative (Alternative 1), are considered in this final EIS. In addition to the 20,000-seat amphitheatre proposed by the Tribe, action alternatives include development of a gravel quarry along with the amphitheatre, construction of a 10,000-seat amphitheatre, and restoration of the current construction site following removal of the unfinished facilities. The Tribes proposal would locate the facility on a 95-acre tract bounded by State Route 164 on the east, Southeast 408th Street on the south, the White River bluffs on the west, and Southeast 404th Street on the north. Approximately 45 acres within the site has already been developed toward the completion of the amphitheatre facilities, including partial construction of the amphitheatre and complete construction of a stormwater pond. The approximately 45 acres of undisturbed area on the site consist of undeveloped grassland. With respect to the entire site, approximately 70 acres would be converted to structures and surface parking for 6,322 to 7,300 vehicles, while the remaining 25 acres would be devoted to landscaping and buffers, including a shielding berm along the southern boundary. Support facilities would include a ticket and administrative office, public rest rooms, concession stands, cafes, a center bar, a loading dock, and a hospitality area for performers. The Canoe Lodge, to be located within the complex, would be used for Tribal meetings and small events and as a restaurant during concert events. Completion of the amphitheatre would require seven months, plus an additional two to three months for start-up and owner equipment setup. All facilities would be completed by the spring of 2001, ready for operation during the summer 2001 concert season. The facility would provide a venue for 30 to 40 concerts per year. POSITIVE IMPACTS: The economically competitive performing arts center would serve the greater Seattle-Tacoma concert market and provide for cultural and educational events and community gatherings and events for the Tribe. The amphitheatre would also provide additional revenues for the Tribe, which has suffered due to declining federal funding in recent years. Newly created jobs would ease unemployment among Tribe members. NEGATIVE IMPACTS: Unless removed and reclaimed, the facility would displace grassland, constituting the chief land use of the site. Less than 0.33 acres of wetlands would be filled, and this impact would be mitigated by the creation of approximately 1.5 acres of wetlands on the site. Noise and light and glare during use of the facility would constitute a minor impact. Traffic levels generated by concerts and other events would constitute a major impact. LEGAL MANDATES: Federal Water Pollution Control Act of 1972 (33 U.S.C. 1251 et seq.). PRIOR REFERENCES: For the abstract of the draft EIS, see 99-0419D, Volume 23, Number 4. JF - EPA number: 020138, Volume I--631 pages and maps, Volume IIA--722 pages and maps, Volume IIB--867 pages and maps, Volume IIIA--557 pages, Volume IIIB--535 pages, April 4, 2002 PY - 2002 VL - 3 KW - Urban and Social Programs KW - Air Quality Assessments KW - Biologic Assessments KW - Cultural Resources KW - Employment KW - Geologic Assessments KW - Gravel KW - Indian Reservations KW - Noise Assessments KW - Quarries KW - Recreation Facilities KW - Socioeconomic Assessments KW - Traffic Analyses KW - Transportation Surveys KW - Vegetation KW - Wetlands KW - Muckleshoot Indian Reservation KW - Washington KW - Federal Water Pollution Control Act of 1972, NPDES Permits UR - http://libproxy.lib.unc.edu/login?url=http://search.proquest.com/docview/36377828?accountid=14244 L2 - http://vb3lk7eb4t.search.serialssolutions.com/?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&rfr_id=info:sid/Environmental+Impact+Statements%3A+Full+Text&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=report&rft.jtitle=&rft.atitle=&rft.au=&rft.aulast=&rft.aufirst=&rft.date=2002-04-04&rft.volume=&rft.issue=&rft.spage=&rft.isbn=&rft.btitle=WHITE+RIVER+AMPHITHEATRE%2C+THE+MUCKLESHOOT+INDIAN+RESERVATION%2C+KINGS+COUNTY%2C+WASHINGTON+STATE.&rft.title=WHITE+RIVER+AMPHITHEATRE%2C+THE+MUCKLESHOOT+INDIAN+RESERVATION%2C+KINGS+COUNTY%2C+WASHINGTON+STATE.&rft.issn=&rft_id=info:doi/ LA - English DB - ProQuest Environmental Science Collection N1 - Name - Department of the Interior, Bureau of Indian Affairs, Portland, Oregon; DOI N1 - Date revised - 2006-05-01 N1 - SuppNotes - Final. Preparation date: April 4, 2002 N1 - Last updated - 2011-12-16 ER - TY - RPRT T1 - WHITE RIVER AMPHITHEATRE, THE MUCKLESHOOT INDIAN RESERVATION, KINGS COUNTY, WASHINGTON STATE. [Part 2 of 4] T2 - WHITE RIVER AMPHITHEATRE, THE MUCKLESHOOT INDIAN RESERVATION, KINGS COUNTY, WASHINGTON STATE. AN - 36368491; 9255-020138_0002 AB - PURPOSE: The Muckleshoot Indian Tribe proposes to construct a 20,000-seat open-air amphitheatre on the Muckleshoot Indian Reservation in the western (Seattle-Tacoma) area of Washington State. The Seattle-Tacoma area is one of five metropolitan areas with a population of over 2.0 million lacking a large outdoor amphitheatre. The Muckleshoot Tribe, which currently has approximately 1,600 enrolled members, is located on the six-square-mile Muckleshoot Indian Reservation, approximately 25 miles southeast of Seattle between the cities of Auburn and Enumclaw. The Tribe and Bill Graham Presents (BGP) entered into a management agreement that provides that the Tribe would own and BGP would manage the facilities. Construction began in 1997, but was suspended in July 1998 to allow the Bureau of Indian Affairs, the Army Corps of Engineers, and the Washington Department of Transportation to conduct further environmental reviews. Five alternatives, including the No Action Alternative (Alternative 1), are considered in this final EIS. In addition to the 20,000-seat amphitheatre proposed by the Tribe, action alternatives include development of a gravel quarry along with the amphitheatre, construction of a 10,000-seat amphitheatre, and restoration of the current construction site following removal of the unfinished facilities. The Tribes proposal would locate the facility on a 95-acre tract bounded by State Route 164 on the east, Southeast 408th Street on the south, the White River bluffs on the west, and Southeast 404th Street on the north. Approximately 45 acres within the site has already been developed toward the completion of the amphitheatre facilities, including partial construction of the amphitheatre and complete construction of a stormwater pond. The approximately 45 acres of undisturbed area on the site consist of undeveloped grassland. With respect to the entire site, approximately 70 acres would be converted to structures and surface parking for 6,322 to 7,300 vehicles, while the remaining 25 acres would be devoted to landscaping and buffers, including a shielding berm along the southern boundary. Support facilities would include a ticket and administrative office, public rest rooms, concession stands, cafes, a center bar, a loading dock, and a hospitality area for performers. The Canoe Lodge, to be located within the complex, would be used for Tribal meetings and small events and as a restaurant during concert events. Completion of the amphitheatre would require seven months, plus an additional two to three months for start-up and owner equipment setup. All facilities would be completed by the spring of 2001, ready for operation during the summer 2001 concert season. The facility would provide a venue for 30 to 40 concerts per year. POSITIVE IMPACTS: The economically competitive performing arts center would serve the greater Seattle-Tacoma concert market and provide for cultural and educational events and community gatherings and events for the Tribe. The amphitheatre would also provide additional revenues for the Tribe, which has suffered due to declining federal funding in recent years. Newly created jobs would ease unemployment among Tribe members. NEGATIVE IMPACTS: Unless removed and reclaimed, the facility would displace grassland, constituting the chief land use of the site. Less than 0.33 acres of wetlands would be filled, and this impact would be mitigated by the creation of approximately 1.5 acres of wetlands on the site. Noise and light and glare during use of the facility would constitute a minor impact. Traffic levels generated by concerts and other events would constitute a major impact. LEGAL MANDATES: Federal Water Pollution Control Act of 1972 (33 U.S.C. 1251 et seq.). PRIOR REFERENCES: For the abstract of the draft EIS, see 99-0419D, Volume 23, Number 4. JF - EPA number: 020138, Volume I--631 pages and maps, Volume IIA--722 pages and maps, Volume IIB--867 pages and maps, Volume IIIA--557 pages, Volume IIIB--535 pages, April 4, 2002 PY - 2002 VL - 2 KW - Urban and Social Programs KW - Air Quality Assessments KW - Biologic Assessments KW - Cultural Resources KW - Employment KW - Geologic Assessments KW - Gravel KW - Indian Reservations KW - Noise Assessments KW - Quarries KW - Recreation Facilities KW - Socioeconomic Assessments KW - Traffic Analyses KW - Transportation Surveys KW - Vegetation KW - Wetlands KW - Muckleshoot Indian Reservation KW - Washington KW - Federal Water Pollution Control Act of 1972, NPDES Permits UR - http://libproxy.lib.unc.edu/login?url=http://search.proquest.com/docview/36368491?accountid=14244 L2 - http://vb3lk7eb4t.search.serialssolutions.com/?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&rfr_id=info:sid/Environmental+Impact+Statements%3A+Full+Text&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=report&rft.jtitle=&rft.atitle=&rft.au=&rft.aulast=&rft.aufirst=&rft.date=2002-04-04&rft.volume=&rft.issue=&rft.spage=&rft.isbn=&rft.btitle=WHITE+RIVER+AMPHITHEATRE%2C+THE+MUCKLESHOOT+INDIAN+RESERVATION%2C+KINGS+COUNTY%2C+WASHINGTON+STATE.&rft.title=WHITE+RIVER+AMPHITHEATRE%2C+THE+MUCKLESHOOT+INDIAN+RESERVATION%2C+KINGS+COUNTY%2C+WASHINGTON+STATE.&rft.issn=&rft_id=info:doi/ LA - English DB - ProQuest Environmental Science Collection N1 - Name - Department of the Interior, Bureau of Indian Affairs, Portland, Oregon; DOI N1 - Date revised - 2006-05-01 N1 - SuppNotes - Final. Preparation date: April 4, 2002 N1 - Last updated - 2011-12-16 ER - TY - RPRT T1 - CAPITAL BELTWAY STUDY, FROM I-95/I-395/I-495 INTERCHANGE TO AMERICAN LEGION BRIDGE, FAIRFAX COUNTY, VIRGINIA. AN - 36410892; 9250 AB - PURPOSE: The improvement of a 14-mile section of Interstate 495 (I-495), also known as the Capital Beltway, in Fairfax County, Virginia is proposed. The study corridor extends from the I-95/I-395/I-495 interchange to the American Legion Bridge. The Beltway was originally designed to serve through traffic bypassing the District of Columbia. However, since its completion in 1964, the growth of the metropolitan area and changes in travel patterns have made the Beltway an integral part of the regional transportation system. Rather than functioning as a bypass, the facility is now used primarily for travel to and from destinations within the region. The highway carries more traffic than any other road in Virginia. Six alternatives, including a No Action Alternative, are considered in this draft EIS. The project would also include improvements to portions of roadways that intersect and connect to the Beltway via existing interchanges at Braddock Road, Little River Turnpike, Gallows Road, Arlington Boulevard, I-66, Leesburg Pike, Chain Bridge Road, Dulles Access/Toll Road, Georgetown Pike, and the George Washington Memorial Parkway. The build alternatives would involve addition of varying numbers of high-occupancy vehicle (HOV) lanes to the facility and options regarding the abovementioned interchange improvements. Rights-of-way acquisition costs are estimated to range from $250 million to $423 million, depending on the alternative selected. Construction costs are expected to range from $2.25 billion to $2.83 billion. POSITIVE IMPACTS: The project would provide for safer and more efficient travel on this circumferential route around the District of Columbia and complete the regional HOV network. Modifications to connecting and intersecting roadways would integrate the proposed Beltway and interchange improvements with existing or planned roadway designs and traffic patterns. The project would decrease cut-through traffic in local communities adjacent to the affected section of the Beltway. Air quality within the corridor would improve significantly. NEGATIVE IMPACTS: Depending on the alternative selected, the project would require 103 to 168 acres of new rights-of-way, displacing 206 to 258 residences and 19 to 32 businesses as well as one nursing home and, possibly, two tennis courts. In addition, 4.62 to 5.06 acres of wetlands, over 8,000 linear feet of stream, five to 5.5 acres of floodplain, Seven public parks would be affected, resulting in the loss of 15.05 to 19.88 acres of parkland. One cultural resource site would be affected. From seven to nine hazardous waste sites would be encountered during construction. Traffic-generated noise would exceed federal standards in the vicinity of 3,672 to 3,879 residential receptor sites. LEGAL MANDATES: Department of Transportation Act of 1966, as amended (49 U.S.C. 1651 et seq.), Federal Water Pollution Control Act of 1972 (33 U.S.C. 1251 et seq.), National Historic Preservation Act of 1966, as amended (16 U.S.C. 470 et seq.), and Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisition Policies Act of 1970 (42 U.S.C. 4601). JF - EPA number: 020133, Draft EIS--391 pages, Map supplement, April 2, 2002 PY - 2002 KW - Roads and Railroads KW - Agency number: FHWA-VA-EIS-02-02-D KW - Archaeological Sites KW - Cost Assessments KW - Cultural Resources KW - Floodplains KW - Hazardous Wastes KW - Highways KW - Highway Structures KW - Hospitals KW - Noise Standards Violations KW - Parks KW - Relocations-Property Acquisitions KW - Safety KW - Section 4(f) Statements KW - Streams KW - Traffic Analyses KW - Wetlands KW - Virginia KW - Federal Water Pollution Control Act of 1972, Section 404 Permits KW - Department of Transportation Act of 1966, Parks KW - National Historic Preservation Act of 1966, Archaeological Sites KW - Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisition Policies Act of 1970, Compliance UR - http://libproxy.lib.unc.edu/login?url=http://search.proquest.com/docview/36410892?accountid=14244 L2 - http://vb3lk7eb4t.search.serialssolutions.com/?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&rfr_id=info:sid/Environmental+Impact+Statements%3A+Digests&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=report&rft.jtitle=&rft.atitle=&rft.au=&rft.aulast=&rft.aufirst=&rft.date=2002-04-02&rft.volume=&rft.issue=&rft.spage=&rft.isbn=&rft.btitle=CAPITAL+BELTWAY+STUDY%2C+FROM+I-95%2FI-395%2FI-495+INTERCHANGE+TO+AMERICAN+LEGION+BRIDGE%2C+FAIRFAX+COUNTY%2C+VIRGINIA.&rft.title=CAPITAL+BELTWAY+STUDY%2C+FROM+I-95%2FI-395%2FI-495+INTERCHANGE+TO+AMERICAN+LEGION+BRIDGE%2C+FAIRFAX+COUNTY%2C+VIRGINIA.&rft.issn=&rft_id=info:doi/ LA - English DB - ProQuest Environmental Science Collection N1 - Name - Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration; DOT N1 - Date revised - 2006-05-01 N1 - SuppNotes - Draft. Preparation date: April 2, 2002 N1 - Last updated - 2011-12-16 ER - TY - GEN T1 - Trends in Enrollment: Fall 2001 Update. Informational Memorandum. AN - 62298183; ED464589 AB - This memorandum contains tables of data about enrollment in institutions in University of Wisconsin (UW) System institutions in fall 2001 and some information about trends over time. The fall 2001 full-time equivalent (FTE) enrollment of 133,701 was up 2,316 (1.8%) from fall 2000. The fall 2001 headcount enrollment of 159,433 was up 2,457 (1.6%) from fall 2000. The UW System exceeded its fall 2001 FTE enrollment target by 1,864 FTE. Seven institutions were within 1% of their FTE enrollment targets, but seven exceeded their targets by more than 1%. An appendix contains a detailed breakdown of fall 2001 enrollment by UW institution (14 institutions). Data on enrollment are presented in eight tables. (SLD) Y1 - 2002/04// PY - 2002 DA - April 2002 SP - 41 PB - University of Wisconsin System, Office of Policy Analysis and Research, 1534 Van Hise Hall, 1200 Linden Drive, Madison, WI 53706. Tel: 608-262-6441. For full text: http://www.uwsa.edu/opar. KW - University of Wisconsin KW - ERIC, Resources in Education (RIE) KW - State Universities KW - Enrollment Trends KW - Enrollment KW - Public Colleges KW - Higher Education UR - http://libproxy.lib.unc.edu/login?url=http://search.proquest.com/docview/62298183?accountid=14244 LA - English DB - ERIC N1 - Last updated - 2017-02-24 ER - TY - RPRT T1 - WINTER USE PLAN FOR THE YELLOWSTONE AND GRAND TETON NATIONAL PARKS AND JOHN D. ROCKEFELLER JR., MEMORIAL PARKWAY, IDAHO, MONTANA, AND WYOMING (DRAFT SUPPLEMENT TO THE FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT OF OCTOBER 2000). AN - 36398775; 9247 AB - PURPOSE: The implementation of a winter use management plan for Yellowstone National Park (YNP), Grand Teton National Park (GTNP), and John D. Rockefeller, Jr. Memorial Parkway in Idaho, Montana, and Wyoming is proposed. YNP, encompassing 2.22 million acres, and GTNP, comprising 310,000 acres, form the core of the Greater Yellowstone Ecosystem, the last large, nearly intact ecosystem in the northern temperate zone. Seven alternatives, including the No Action Alternative (Alternative A), were considered in the final EIS of October 2000. The concept under the preferred alternative (Alternative G) would emphasize clean, quiet access to the parks using the technologies available today. The plan would allow oversnow access on all routes currently available only via snowcoach managed by the National Park Service. Other key changes in recreational opportunities would include elimination of winter plowing on the route connecting Colter Bay to Flagg Ranch, designating Flagg Ranch as a destination to be accessed via oversnow transport, elimination of all winter motorized use on Jackson Lake, prohibition of backcountry use within important big horn sheep winter habitat, and implementation of an information program in cooperation with local communities. The alternative would address the full range of issues regarding safety, natural resource impacts, and visitor experience and access. Snowmobile users would be provided with means of accessing the park by a different mode of transport. Noise levels for any activity would be limited to no more than 75 decibels in the short-term and no more than 70 decibels eventually. Late-night oversnow travel would be prohibited. A total of 16 miles of new nonmotorized trail would be established. This draft supplement to the final EIS evaluates three alternatives to the previous decision, which is incorporated in the supplement as the current management or No Action Alternative (Alternative 1a). Alternative 1b would implement the same measures as Alternative 1a, but implementation would be delayed for one year. Alternative 2 would maintain snowmobile use on all existing roads, but at a reduced level in three years from the West Entrance and potentially increased levels from other entrances, but new technology would be used to reduce air pollutant emissions and noise from snowmobiles. Alternative 3 would allow snowmobiles on all major, but not all, snow roads, using the same sort of new technology as under Alternative 2 and enforcing reduced use levels in some areas. POSITIVE IMPACTS: The plan would ensure that visitors have a range of quality winter experiences and settings at their disposal, while improving visitor safety significantly. Closure of bighorn sheep areas could benefit wolverines, and effects related to groomed surfaces would decrease in the GTNP, benefiting martens. Sound levels in the park would generally decrease. Recreational experiences would be offered in appropriate settings, preventing significant adverse impacts to sensitive natural, cultural, and recreational resources. Winter recreation would complement the unique aspects of each landscape within the ecosystem. Visitors would be informed regarding safe participation in winter use activities that would not damage resources. Snowmobile noise and air and water pollutant emissions would be minimized, and damage to wetlands and other habitat by oversnow vehicles would decline significantly. NEGATIVE IMPACTS: The plan would result in minor negative effects on local and state economies and major adverse impacts to small communities within the Greater Yellowstone Area. Nonmarket visitation would decline due to access restrictions, particularly in the areas associated with Grassy Lake Road and Jackson Lake would reduce visitation to these area. Use of snowcoaches could continue to displace lynx as routes pass through linx habitat, but effects of snowcoaches would be less than those of snowmobiles. Earlier opening dates would increase the potential for conflicts between grizzly bear and visitors. LEGAL MANDATES: Executive Orders 11644 and 11989, General Authorities Act (16 U.S.C. 1a(1)-1a(8)), and National Park Service Organic Act of 1916 (16 U.S.C. 1, 2-4). PRIOR REFERENCES: For the abstracts of the draft and final EISs, see 99-0375, Volume 23, Number 4 and 01-0020F Volume 25, Number 1. JF - EPA number: 020130, Volume 1--365 pages and maps, Volume 2--322 pages, April 1, 2002 PY - 2002 KW - Parks, Refuges and Forests KW - Air Quality KW - Cultural Resources KW - Endangered Species (Animals) KW - Geothermal Resources KW - Highways KW - Impact Monitoring Plans KW - Land Management KW - Motor Vehicles KW - National Parks KW - Recreation Facilities KW - Recreation Resources KW - Recreation Resources Management KW - Recreation Resources Surveys KW - Roads KW - Safety KW - Ski Areas KW - Trails KW - Transportation KW - Water Quality KW - Wetlands KW - Wildlife Management KW - Grand Teton National Park KW - Idaho KW - Montana KW - Wyoming KW - Yellowstone National Park KW - Executive Order 11644, Compliance KW - Executive Order 11989, Compliance UR - http://libproxy.lib.unc.edu/login?url=http://search.proquest.com/docview/36398775?accountid=14244 L2 - http://vb3lk7eb4t.search.serialssolutions.com/?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&rfr_id=info:sid/Environmental+Impact+Statements%3A+Digests&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=report&rft.jtitle=&rft.atitle=&rft.au=&rft.aulast=&rft.aufirst=&rft.date=2002-04-01&rft.volume=&rft.issue=&rft.spage=&rft.isbn=&rft.btitle=WINTER+USE+PLAN+FOR+THE+YELLOWSTONE+AND+GRAND+TETON+NATIONAL+PARKS+AND+JOHN+D.+ROCKEFELLER+JR.%2C+MEMORIAL+PARKWAY%2C+IDAHO%2C+MONTANA%2C+AND+WYOMING+%28DRAFT+SUPPLEMENT+TO+THE+FINAL+ENVIRONMENTAL+IMPACT+STATEMENT+OF+OCTOBER+2000%29.&rft.title=WINTER+USE+PLAN+FOR+THE+YELLOWSTONE+AND+GRAND+TETON+NATIONAL+PARKS+AND+JOHN+D.+ROCKEFELLER+JR.%2C+MEMORIAL+PARKWAY%2C+IDAHO%2C+MONTANA%2C+AND+WYOMING+%28DRAFT+SUPPLEMENT+TO+THE+FINAL+ENVIRONMENTAL+IMPACT+STATEMENT+OF+OCTOBER+2000%29.&rft.issn=&rft_id=info:doi/ LA - English DB - ProQuest Environmental Science Collection N1 - Name - Department of the Interior, National Park Service, Lakewood, Colorado; DOI N1 - Date revised - 2006-05-01 N1 - SuppNotes - Draft. Preparation date: April 1, 2002 N1 - Last updated - 2011-12-16 ER - TY - RPRT T1 - GREAT BASIN NATIONAL PARK VISITOR CENTER, WHITE PINE COUNTY, NEVADA, (DRAFT SUPPLEMENTAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT FOR THE AMENDMENT OF THE GENERAL MANAGEMENT PLAN OF 1993). AN - 36422831; 9239 AB - PURPOSE: A amendment to the general management plan governing development and use of the Great Basin National Park, located in White Pine County, Nevada, is proposed to allow for construction of a visitor learning center. The 200,000-square-mile Great Basin physiographic region consists of more than 90 wide valley basins separated by 160 long, parallel, north/south-trending mountain ranges. The 77,082-acre Great Basin National Park lies at the heart of this vast region in the Snake Range in east-central Nevada, approximately 300 miles north of Las Vegas and 250 miles southwest of Salt Lake City, Utah. The plan proposed in the December 1992 final EIS, addressed management zoning, visitor use and development, natural resource management, cultural resource management, and land protection. The plan focuses on diversifying visitor opportunities by expanding interpretation of significant features in the park and in the Great Basin physiographic region, improving access to and within the park, providing a new visitor center, and offering new ways to view and appreciate the park's many resources. Most visitors continue to concentrate in the Lehman Cave and Wheeler Park areas, and two subzones were established in these areas to accommodate modern and semi-primitive day uses. The southern portion of the park was opened to more backcountry use by including large areas in the semi-primitive subzone, and trails were built to allow visitors to hike the entire length of the park from north to south. Areas with special resource needs and concerns, in particular the alpine and subalpine areas above 10,500 feet, were included in the protected natural area and research natural area subzones. The remainder of the park was designated as a primitive subzone. Grazing of domestic livestock continue under the enabling legislation except in the semiprimitive day-use area, protected natural area, and research natural area subzones. All valid mining claims are recognized. Historic resources of particular interest in the plan include the Lehman orchard, Lehman aqueduct, Rhodes cabin, Osceola ditch, and Johnson mill and mine. Land protection measures focus on visual resources, trailheads, eastern and western boundary adjustments, and rights- of-way. The currently proposed amendment would result in the construction of a visitor center within an 80-acre site on Baker Ridge. The facility would be between 9,500 square and 11,500 square feet and could consist of one or as many as three separate buildings. In addition to the proposed action, two alternatives, including a No Action Alternative, are considered in this draft supplemental EIS. POSITIVE IMPACTS: The visitor center would concentrate and consolidate National Park Service (NPS) functions in one location, provide more convenient access for the visiting public, eliminate potential impacts to park resources resulting from the construction of new facilities within the park, and follow newer NPS planning guidelines that encourage construction of facilities outside of the park unit. NEGATIVE IMPACTS: Construction of the center would directly impact archaeological site 26WP2016 and indirectly impact the other three sites within the 80-acre parcel. LEGAL MANDATES: National Historic Preservation Act of 1966, as amended (16 U.S.C. 470 et seq.). PRIOR REFERENCES: For the abstracts of the draft and final EISs, see 910402D, Volume 15, Number 6 and 92-0460F, Volume 16, Number 6. JF - EPA number: 020122, 75 pages, March 26, 2002 PY - 2002 KW - Parks, Refuges and Forests KW - Archaeological Sites KW - Buildings KW - Cultural Resources KW - Cultural Resources Assessments KW - Land Management KW - Parks KW - Recreation Resources KW - Recreation Resources Management KW - Socioeconomic Assessments KW - Traffic Analyses KW - Visual Resources KW - Wildlife KW - Wildlife Habitat KW - Water Quality Assessments KW - Wetlands KW - Great Basin National Park KW - Nevada KW - National Historic Preservation Act of 1966, Archaeological Sites UR - http://libproxy.lib.unc.edu/login?url=http://search.proquest.com/docview/36422831?accountid=14244 L2 - http://vb3lk7eb4t.search.serialssolutions.com/?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&rfr_id=info:sid/Environmental+Impact+Statements%3A+Digests&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=report&rft.jtitle=&rft.atitle=&rft.au=&rft.aulast=&rft.aufirst=&rft.date=2002-03-26&rft.volume=&rft.issue=&rft.spage=&rft.isbn=&rft.btitle=GREAT+BASIN+NATIONAL+PARK+VISITOR+CENTER%2C+WHITE+PINE+COUNTY%2C+NEVADA%2C+%28DRAFT+SUPPLEMENTAL+ENVIRONMENTAL+IMPACT+STATEMENT+FOR+THE+AMENDMENT+OF+THE+GENERAL+MANAGEMENT+PLAN+OF+1993%29.&rft.title=GREAT+BASIN+NATIONAL+PARK+VISITOR+CENTER%2C+WHITE+PINE+COUNTY%2C+NEVADA%2C+%28DRAFT+SUPPLEMENTAL+ENVIRONMENTAL+IMPACT+STATEMENT+FOR+THE+AMENDMENT+OF+THE+GENERAL+MANAGEMENT+PLAN+OF+1993%29.&rft.issn=&rft_id=info:doi/ LA - English DB - ProQuest Environmental Science Collection N1 - Name - Department of the Interior, National Park Service, Baker, Nevada; DOI N1 - Date revised - 2006-05-01 N1 - SuppNotes - Draft. Preparation date: March 26, 2002 N1 - Last updated - 2011-12-16 ER - TY - RPRT T1 - RECREATION AREA MANAGEMENT PLAN AND AMENDMENT TO THE CALIFORNIA DESERT CONSERVATION AREA PLAN: IMPERIAL SAND DUNES RECREATION AREA, IMPERIAL AND YUMA COUNTIES, CALIFORNIA. AN - 36411325; 9231 AB - PURPOSE: The modification of the management plan for the 227,000-acre Imperial Sand Dune Recreation Area of the California Desert Area, Imperial County, California. The recreation area lies approximately 25 miles west of the Colorado River and immediately north of the Mexican border. The plan modification would include designation of management areas, assignment of recreation opportunity spectrum classifications to those management areas, enhancement of efforts to encourage a safe and enjoyable recreational experience for visitors, and public education about off-highway vehicle (OHV) use in the context of the recreational, cultural, and biological resources of the area. Four alternatives, including a No Action Alternative (Alternative 1), which would continue the current management regime, are considered in this draft EIS. Management actions that are common to all action alternatives would include maintenance and management of the area as a unique recreational locale; development of a public relations program with respect to cultural and natural resources and safety; implementation principles of adaptive management; implementation of dust control measures on wash roads and installation of air monitoring equipment; establish various public safety regulations and visitor use limitations, including limitations on OHV use; allowance of commercial vending Friday through Sunday from October 1 through May 31; prohibition of nonrecreational commercial activities during holidays; development or retrofitting of various access and maintenance facilities, all of which would occur outside of primitive areas; and establish and monitor a user fee structure. Variation amongst the alternatives largely is represented by differences in designations for the primary management areas, which include the Mammoth area, North Algodones Dunes, the Gecko and Glamis areas, the adaptive management area, the Ogilby area, Dune Buggy Flats, Buttercup, and the buffer area. POSITIVE IMPACTS: Any alternative would provide for the conservation of the unique recreational opportunities afforded by the area. Road and OHV access into and within the area would be controlled to allow for a balance of recreational opportunity, public safety protection, and resource protection. The area would continue to contribute to regional tourism-related income. Action alternatives would result in the improvement of air quality in the area. NEGATIVE IMPACTS: Under certain alternatives, special status plants and wildlife would be impacted. The alternatives vary in the level of land and vegetation disturbance by OHVs that would be expected. Access to some areas could be more restricted than at present. LEGAL MANDATES: California Desert Protection Act of 1994 (P.L. 103-433) and Federal Land Policy and Management Act of 1976 (43 U.S.C. 1701 et seq.) JF - EPA number: 020114, 461 pages, March 21, 2002 PY - 2002 KW - Urban and Social Programs KW - Air Quality Assessments KW - Biologic Assessments KW - Desert Land KW - Dunes KW - Endangered Species (Animals) KW - Endangered Species (Plants) KW - Erosion KW - Land Management KW - Motor Vehicles KW - Recreation Facilities KW - Recreation Resources KW - Recreation Resources Management KW - Safety KW - Vegetation KW - California KW - Sand Dunes Recreation Area KW - California Desert Protection Act of 1994, Compliance KW - Federal Land Policy and Management Act of 1976, Compliance UR - http://libproxy.lib.unc.edu/login?url=http://search.proquest.com/docview/36411325?accountid=14244 L2 - http://vb3lk7eb4t.search.serialssolutions.com/?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&rfr_id=info:sid/Environmental+Impact+Statements%3A+Digests&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=report&rft.jtitle=&rft.atitle=&rft.au=&rft.aulast=&rft.aufirst=&rft.date=2002-03-21&rft.volume=&rft.issue=&rft.spage=&rft.isbn=&rft.btitle=RECREATION+AREA+MANAGEMENT+PLAN+AND+AMENDMENT+TO+THE+CALIFORNIA+DESERT+CONSERVATION+AREA+PLAN%3A+IMPERIAL+SAND+DUNES+RECREATION+AREA%2C+IMPERIAL+AND+YUMA+COUNTIES%2C+CALIFORNIA.&rft.title=RECREATION+AREA+MANAGEMENT+PLAN+AND+AMENDMENT+TO+THE+CALIFORNIA+DESERT+CONSERVATION+AREA+PLAN%3A+IMPERIAL+SAND+DUNES+RECREATION+AREA%2C+IMPERIAL+AND+YUMA+COUNTIES%2C+CALIFORNIA.&rft.issn=&rft_id=info:doi/ LA - English DB - ProQuest Environmental Science Collection N1 - Name - Department of the Interior, Bureau of Land Management, El Centro, California; DOI N1 - Date revised - 2006-05-01 N1 - SuppNotes - Draft. Preparation date: March 21, 2002 N1 - Last updated - 2011-12-16 ER - TY - RPRT T1 - SANTO DOMINGO PUEBLO, PROPOSED LAND EXCHANGE, SANDOVAL AND SANTA FE COUNTIES, NEW MEXICO. AN - 36398951; 9230 AB - PURPOSE: The implementation of a land exchange between the Bureau of Land Management (BLM) and the Santo Domingo Pueblo in New Mexico is proposed. The exchange would involve approximately 7,376 acres of federal surface and subsurface estate north of County Road 252 A (formerly State Road 22) and south of the Santo Domingo Reservation and private lands of equal value, yet to be acquired by the Pueblo, within high priority acquisition areas, as identified in the Rio Puerco and Taos resource management plans. Three alternatives, including a No Action Alternative (Alternative C), are considered in this final EIS. Under the proposed action (Alternative A), the federal land would be transferred with reservation of a conservation easement on all land except 1,300 acres. Under Alternative B, the land would be transferred without a reservation of a conservation easement. Alternative B would assume the development of sand and gravel mining operations on 2,600 acres and development of residential and commercial uses on 1,500 acres. Land of equivalent value would be transferred to the BLM by the Pueblo under either action alternative. POSITIVE IMPACTS: Completing the exchange would enhance BLM's land ownership consolidation in the area. The exchange would also help reduce conflicts between public land users and private land owners, eliminate inappropriate development of private inholdings in specially designated areas, and increase BLM's management flexibility. In addition, the Santo Domingo Pueblo would acquire lands that have been identified as having significant traditional cultural values to the group. Approximately 31 million cubic yards of sand and gravel would be accessible for development under the proposed action, providing $34.6 in income to tribal interests. All lands transferred by the BLM would be available for livestock grazing, multiple-use recreation by the members of the Pueblo NEGATIVE IMPACTS: The proposed action would result in the disturbance of 1,300 acres of wildlife habitat due to mining activities. Sand and gravel mining would result in the consumption of five acre-feet of water annually. Approximately 129 million cubic yards of sand and gravel worth $1.7 million would be rendered unavailable for development. None of the area transferred by the BLM would be available to access by the general public. Federal visual resource protection would be lost. LEGAL MANDATES: Federal Land Policy and Management Act of 1976 (43 U.S.C. 1701 et seq.). PRIOR REFERENCES: For the abstract of the draft EIS, see 01-0019D, Volume 25, Number 1. JF - EPA number: 020113, 105 pages, March 21, 2002 PY - 2002 KW - Land Use KW - Agency number: BLM/NM/PL-02-004-7122 KW - Biologic Assessments KW - Commercial Zones KW - Cultural Resources KW - Geologic Assessments KW - Gravel KW - Grazing KW - Housing KW - Hydrologic Assessments KW - Indian Reservations KW - Land Acquisitions KW - Land Management KW - Livestock KW - Mining KW - Property Disposition KW - Recreation Resources KW - Sand KW - Visual Resources KW - Wildlife KW - New Mexico KW - Federal Land Policy and Management Act of 1976, Compliance UR - http://libproxy.lib.unc.edu/login?url=http://search.proquest.com/docview/36398951?accountid=14244 L2 - http://vb3lk7eb4t.search.serialssolutions.com/?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&rfr_id=info:sid/Environmental+Impact+Statements%3A+Digests&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=report&rft.jtitle=&rft.atitle=&rft.au=&rft.aulast=&rft.aufirst=&rft.date=2002-03-21&rft.volume=&rft.issue=&rft.spage=&rft.isbn=&rft.btitle=SANTO+DOMINGO+PUEBLO%2C+PROPOSED+LAND+EXCHANGE%2C+SANDOVAL+AND+SANTA+FE+COUNTIES%2C+NEW+MEXICO.&rft.title=SANTO+DOMINGO+PUEBLO%2C+PROPOSED+LAND+EXCHANGE%2C+SANDOVAL+AND+SANTA+FE+COUNTIES%2C+NEW+MEXICO.&rft.issn=&rft_id=info:doi/ LA - English DB - ProQuest Environmental Science Collection N1 - Name - Department of the Interior, Bureau of Land Management, Albuquerque, New Mexico; DOI N1 - Date revised - 2006-05-01 N1 - SuppNotes - Final. Preparation date: March 21, 2002 N1 - Last updated - 2011-12-16 ER - TY - RPRT T1 - MARY MCLEOD BETHUNE COUNCIL HOUSE NATIONAL HISTORIC SITE GENERAL MANAGEMENT PLAN, WASHINGTON, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA. AN - 36419270; 9219 AB - PURPOSE: The implementation of a general management plan for the Mary McLeod Bethune Council House National Historic Site in Washington, District of Columbia is proposed. Mary McLeod Bethune was a renowned educator, organizer, national political leader, president of the National Association of Colored Women, and founder of the National Council of Negro Women. What is now the Mary McLeod Bethune Council National Historic Site was her official Washington address from 1943 to 1949. It is at this site that Dr. Bethune achieved her greatest national and international recognition. At this site, the first headquarters of the National Council of Negro Women, Dr. Bethune and the council spearheaded the strategies and developed the programs that advanced the interests of African-American women and the black community. The site is also the location of the National Archives for Black Women's History. Four alternatives, including the No Action Alternative (Alternative 1), are considered in this final EIS. Alternative 2, the preferred alternative, would expand interpretation of the house and the life of Dr. Bethune and the archives. The plan would recommend the purchase and rehabilitation of an adjacent row house to provide space for orientation activities, restrooms, and office space. Administrative functions would be separate from the visitor areas. Many of the archival collections would be moved to the Museum Resource Center. The interpretation program would be broad and balanced. The plan would direct management of the site for the next 10 to 15 years. Cost of implementing the preferred alternative is estimated at approximately $2.4 million. POSITIVE IMPACTS: Moving visitor orientation to an adjacent building would provide additional visitor services while slightly decreasing the impacts of visitors with respect to the historic structure. In addition, the proposed changes to the archives would expand the audience that could be reached via electronic media and would allow the archives to become a significant state-of-the-art research institution. The interpretation program would provide more in-depth treatment of Dr. Bethune's role as a public figure and organizer. NEGATIVE IMPACTS: Minor changes in the house proper would alter its historic character somewhat. Visitors using private automobiles would find difficulty parking due to lack of space in the area. Increasing the square footage of the site would increase maintenance and utility sites. One or more occupants in the structure to be acquired would be displaced. One or more occupants of a residential structure could be displaced. LEGAL MANDATES: Public Law 97-329, Public Law 102-88, Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisition Policies Act of 1970 (42 U.S.C. 4601). PRIOR REFERENCES: For the abstract of the draft EIS, see 01-0402D, Volume 25, Number 4. JF - EPA number: 020104, 167 pages, March 14, 2002 PY - 2002 KW - Urban and Social Programs KW - Cost Assessments KW - Cultural Resources KW - Cultural Resources Management KW - Hazardous Wastes KW - Historic Sites KW - Minorities KW - Museums KW - Parking KW - Relocations-Property Acquisitions KW - Vegetation KW - Water Resources KW - Wildlife KW - District of Columbia KW - Public Law 97-329, Compliance KW - Public Law 102-88, Project Authorization KW - Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisition Policies Act of 1970, Compliance UR - http://libproxy.lib.unc.edu/login?url=http://search.proquest.com/docview/36419270?accountid=14244 L2 - http://vb3lk7eb4t.search.serialssolutions.com/?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&rfr_id=info:sid/Environmental+Impact+Statements%3A+Digests&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=report&rft.jtitle=&rft.atitle=Statistical+summary&rft.au=Smith%2C+Stephen+D&rft.aulast=Smith&rft.aufirst=Stephen&rft.date=2001-01-01&rft.volume=29&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=2&rft.isbn=&rft.btitle=&rft.title=Journal+of+Critical+Care&rft.issn=08839441&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016%2Fj.jcrc.2013.10.009 LA - English DB - ProQuest Environmental Science Collection N1 - Name - Department of the Interior, National Park Service, Washington, District of Columbia; DOI N1 - Date revised - 2006-05-01 N1 - SuppNotes - Final. Preparation date: March 14, 2002 N1 - Last updated - 2011-12-16 ER - TY - RPRT T1 - I-94 JACKSON FREEWAY MODERNIZATION PROJECT, M-60 TO SARGENT ROAD, JACKSON COUNTY, MICHIGAN. AN - 36410693; 9215 AB - PURPOSE: The improvement of a nine-mile segment of Interstate 94 (I-94) through the Jackson urban area of Jackson County, Michigan is proposed. Four alternatives, including a No Action Alternative, are considered in detail in this EIS. Alternative I would provide road improvements align the existing alignment throughout the entire project areas, including construction of three continuous travel lanes in each direction, with a fourth auxiliary lane within some sections. The BL interchange would be relocated and combined with the Sargent Road Interchange. All bridges in the project corridor would be replaced. Modifications to local roads in the area would include modifications of elevation (profile), shifting centerline alignments, and addition of travel lanes. The major difference distinguishing Alternative II from Alternative I would involve interchange configuration designs. The major differences distinguishing Alternative III from Alternative I would involve the locations of the auxiliary lanes and interchange configurations. Costs of Alternatives I, II, and III are estimated at $345 million, $465 million, and $440 million, respectively; all cost figures are in 2001 dollars. POSITIVE IMPACTS: The project would improve and modernize deteriorating road segments and bridges, enhance travel efficiency and roadway capacity, and improve motorist safety by upgrading roadway geometrics. Minor economic benefits would result from better access and minor improvements in pedestrian and bicycle circulation would be realized. Response times for emergency vehicles using I-94 would decrease. NEGATIVE IMPACTS: Depending on the alternative selected, the rights-of-way requirements, ranging from 61 to 122 acres, would result in the displacement of 2.9 acres of prime farmland, 10 to 15 acres of active farmland, four to 18 residences, seven to 11 businesses, and parking spaces at three to five properties. The project would also affect 3.6 to 3.8 acres of floodplain, 31.5 to 36.5 acres of wetlands, up to 1.5 acres of Indiana bat habitat, and one historic site. Traffic-generated noise would exceed federal standards in the vicinity of 223 to 229 sensitive receptors. It is as yet inconclusive as to whether impacts would disproportionally affect minority and/or low-income populations. Construction workers would encounter five or six hazardous materials sites. LEGAL MANDATES: Department of Transportation Act of 1966, as amended (49 U.S.C. 1651 et seq.), Federal Water Pollution Control Act of 1972 (33 U.S.C. 1251 et seq.), and Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisition Policies Act of 1970 (42 U.S.C. 4601). JF - EPA number: 020100, 291 pages and maps, March 11, 2002 PY - 2002 KW - Roads and Railroads KW - Agency number: FHWA-MI-EIS-02-01-D KW - Bridges KW - Endangered Species (Animals) KW - Farmlands KW - Floodplains KW - Highways KW - Highway Structures KW - Historic Sites KW - Minorities KW - Noise Standards Violations KW - Parking KW - Relocation Plans KW - Relocations-Property Acquisitions KW - Safety KW - Section 4(f) Statements KW - Wetlands KW - Michigan KW - Department of Transportation Act of 1966, Historic Sites KW - Federal Water Pollution Control Act of 1972, Section 404 Permits KW - Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisition Policies Act of 1970, Compliance UR - http://libproxy.lib.unc.edu/login?url=http://search.proquest.com/docview/36410693?accountid=14244 L2 - http://vb3lk7eb4t.search.serialssolutions.com/?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&rfr_id=info:sid/Environmental+Impact+Statements%3A+Digests&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=report&rft.jtitle=&rft.atitle=&rft.au=&rft.aulast=&rft.aufirst=&rft.date=2002-03-11&rft.volume=&rft.issue=&rft.spage=&rft.isbn=&rft.btitle=I-94+JACKSON+FREEWAY+MODERNIZATION+PROJECT%2C+M-60+TO+SARGENT+ROAD%2C+JACKSON+COUNTY%2C+MICHIGAN.&rft.title=I-94+JACKSON+FREEWAY+MODERNIZATION+PROJECT%2C+M-60+TO+SARGENT+ROAD%2C+JACKSON+COUNTY%2C+MICHIGAN.&rft.issn=&rft_id=info:doi/ LA - English DB - ProQuest Environmental Science Collection N1 - Name - Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration, Lansing, Michigan; DOT N1 - Date revised - 2006-05-01 N1 - SuppNotes - Draft. Preparation date: March 11, 2002 N1 - Last updated - 2011-12-16 ER - TY - RPRT T1 - GENERAL MANAGEMENT PLAN, GRAND PORTAGE NATIONAL MONUMENT, COOK COUNTY, MINNESOTA. AN - 36412033; 9220 AB - PURPOSE: The implementation of a general management plan for the Grand Portage National Monument in Cook County, Minnesota is proposed. The Monument consists of a nine-mile trail on the northwestern periphery of the Great Lakes-St. Lawrence River drainage connecting the lake shore to Fort Charlotte. The trail an important setting for the activities of the northern fur trade, a dynamic enterprise that forged diverse relationships between American Indian and non-Indian peoples as early as the 17th Century. Fort Charlotte was an embarkation point for voyagers heading west and a gathering point for furs going east. The portage was the most direct route from the Great Lakes into the Canadian inteior. Several falls and cataracts cobked use of the Pigeon River by voyagers requiring the creation of the portage. Five alternatives, including a No Action Alternative (Alternative A), are considered in this draft EIS. The preferred alternative (Alterantive E) would focus on three activity centers, namely the heritage center, the stockade, and a new Ojibwe Cultural Demonstration Shelter. In an effort to integrate the national monument into the community, the National ark Service and the Grand Portage Band would develop a "gateway" to the community of Grand Portage at the intersection of State Route 61 and County Road 17. This landscaped, redesigned intersection would welcome visitors to the comunity, the national monument, and the Grand Portage Casino. A new year-round heritage center would be built to introduce visitors to the national monument and to take modern functions out of the stockade. An Ojibwe Cultural Demonstration Shelter would interpret the rich and long-term story of the Ojibwe heritage, including contemporary heritage activities. Three structures would be reconstructed in the stockade area, and all other known structures would be outlined on the ground to help interpretive staff provide a more exciting and comprehensive story. The Fort Charlotte campsites would be upgraded. The Mount Rose trail would become a loop trail connecting to the new heritage center. The portage trail, which would also become a portion of a loop train connecting with the stockade and the 20th century Ojibwe village site, would be restored to a semblance of its historic appearance. Estimated cost of the preferred alternative is in excess of $15 million. Costs of additional staff requirements are estimated at $355,000 per year. POSITIVE IMPACTS: Amongst the alternatives, Alternative E would offer the most intense interpretation of the monument's historical and cultural significance. An optimum balance would be struck between interpretation of the fur trade and the Ojibwe heritage and culture. The upper portions of the portage trail would continue to have a high degree of integrity, and removing the housing and maintenance buildings and rehabilitating the trail would enhance the historic setting. Active maintenance of the 20th century village landscape would allow them to exist in perpetuity. Connecting the portage trail to an overall interpretive trail would improve access to the portage and the community. NEGATIVE IMPACTS: Increased visitation expected under Alternative E would increase wear on and other damage to the trails and vegetation and would increase the risk of damage to archaeological resources. Construction of the heritage center and Monument headquarters could affect three state-listed protected plant species. Blasting during construction could cause cliff faces to crumble or screen slopes to slide. The heritage center parking lot could change the shading and moisture retention of adjacent sites that provide soil for the listed plants. LEGAL MANDATES: National Park Service Organic Act of 1916 (PL Chapter 408, 39 Stat 535) and Public Law 89-910. JF - EPA number: 020105, 188 pages, March 5, 2002 PY - 2002 KW - Parks, Refuges and Forests KW - Agency number: DES 02-08 KW - Archaeological Sites KW - Air Quality KW - Cost Assessments KW - Cultural Resources Surveys KW - Endangered Species (Plants) KW - Floodplains KW - Historic Sites KW - Indian Reservations KW - Land Management KW - Parking KW - Recreation KW - Trails KW - Water Quality KW - Wetlands KW - Grand Portage National Monument KW - Minnesota KW - National Park Service Organic Act of 1916, Compliance KW - Public Law 89-910, Project Authorization UR - http://libproxy.lib.unc.edu/login?url=http://search.proquest.com/docview/36412033?accountid=14244 L2 - http://vb3lk7eb4t.search.serialssolutions.com/?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&rfr_id=info:sid/Environmental+Impact+Statements%3A+Digests&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=report&rft.jtitle=&rft.atitle=&rft.au=&rft.aulast=&rft.aufirst=&rft.date=2002-03-05&rft.volume=&rft.issue=&rft.spage=&rft.isbn=&rft.btitle=GENERAL+MANAGEMENT+PLAN%2C+GRAND+PORTAGE+NATIONAL+MONUMENT%2C+COOK+COUNTY%2C+MINNESOTA.&rft.title=GENERAL+MANAGEMENT+PLAN%2C+GRAND+PORTAGE+NATIONAL+MONUMENT%2C+COOK+COUNTY%2C+MINNESOTA.&rft.issn=&rft_id=info:doi/ LA - English DB - ProQuest Environmental Science Collection N1 - Name - Department of the Interior, National Park Service, Grand Marais, Minnesota; DOI N1 - Date revised - 2006-05-01 N1 - SuppNotes - Draft. Preparation date: March 5, 2002 N1 - Last updated - 2011-12-16 ER - TY - RPRT T1 - BOULDER CITY/US 93 CORRIDOR STUDY, CLARK COUNTY, NEVADA. AN - 36408699; 9208 AB - PURPOSE: The improvement of 10.4 miles of US 93 in the vicinity of Boulder City, Clark County, Nevada is proposed. The study corridor extends from US 95 in the city of Henderson on the west to a point 4.7 miles east of downtown Boulder City at the planned western end of the Hoover Dam Bypass project. Within the study corridor, US 93 varies from a four-lane divided roadway to a two-lane roadway, with numerous business driveway access points and cross streets. The various roadway cross-sections and other deficiencies result in peak hour traffic congestion and a high accident rate. Four alternatives, including a No Action Alternative (Alternative A), are considered in this draft EIS. Alternative B would involve a general widening of existing US 93 and other roadway improvements within the study corridor limits. The alternative would make improvements to the existing 11 miles of roadway, mostly within the existing US 93 rights-of-way. The improved facility would consist of a four-lane divided freeway. Alternative C would provide a new through-town freeway connecting the western and eastern study termini. It would consist of a continuous four-lane, controlled-access freeway parallel to existing US 93. Alternative D would provide a southern bypass of Boulder City. It would consist of a continuous four-lane, controlled access divided freeway bypassing the developed area of the city to the south. Depending on the action alternative considered, costs of the project range from $220 million to $345 million in 2002 dollars. POSITIVE IMPACTS: The project would provide overall transportation improvements within the corridor, improving regional mobility and reducing the number of accidents affecting users of the facility. Local circulation and access would be maintained or improved. Noise levels and air pollution emissions along the existing corridor would decline regardless of the action alterative selected. NEGATIVE IMPACTS: Rights-of-way requirements for the action alternatives would result in the displacement of 327 to 679 acres of wildlife habitat, including habitat for Gila monsters and bats under Alternative D, up to 5.82 acres of wetlands and 14.2 acres of Waters of the U.S., and 10.4 to 29.9 acres of floodplain, Five businesses would be displaced under Alternative B. Two to six archaeological sites and six to 10 historic sites would be affected by the project. The project would affect one acre of the River Mountains Loop Trail, 76 acres of a planned public golf course, and/or 85 acres of the Lake Mead National Recreation Area. Water quality in the desert washes that drain the project area could be degraded due to stormwater runoff from the highway. LEGAL MANDATES: Department of Transportation Act of 1966, as amended (49 U.S.C. 1651 et seq.), National Historic Preservation Act of 1966, as amended (16 U.S.C. 470 et seq.), and Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisition Policies Act of 1970 (42 U.S.C. 4601). JF - EPA number: 020093, 569 pages and maps, March 4, 2002 PY - 2002 KW - Roads and Railroads KW - Agency number: FHWA-NV-EIS-00-02-D KW - Archaeological Sites KW - Desert Land KW - Floodplains KW - Highways KW - Highway Structures KW - Historic Sites KW - Land Use KW - Recreation Facilities KW - Recreation Resources KW - Relocations-Property Acquisitions KW - Section 4(f) Statements KW - Trails KW - Visual Resources KW - Water Quality KW - Water Resources KW - Wetlands KW - Wildlife Habitat KW - Lake Mead National Recreation Area KW - Nevada KW - Department of Transportation Act of 1966, Compliance KW - National Historic Preservation Act of 1966, Archaeologic Sites KW - National Historic Preservation Act of 1966, Historic Sites KW - Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisition Policies Act of 1970, Compliance UR - http://libproxy.lib.unc.edu/login?url=http://search.proquest.com/docview/36408699?accountid=14244 L2 - http://vb3lk7eb4t.search.serialssolutions.com/?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&rfr_id=info:sid/Environmental+Impact+Statements%3A+Digests&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=book&rft.jtitle=&rft.atitle=&rft.au=&rft.aulast=&rft.aufirst=&rft.date=2001-01-01&rft.volume=&rft.issue=&rft.spage=&rft.isbn=&rft.btitle=Minerals+yearbook%3B+metals+and+minerals+1999&rft.title=Minerals+yearbook%3B+metals+and+minerals+1999&rft.issn=00768952&rft_id=info:doi/ LA - English DB - ProQuest Environmental Science Collection N1 - Name - Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration, Carson City, Nevada; DOT N1 - Date revised - 2006-05-01 N1 - SuppNotes - Draft. Preparation date: March 4, 2002 N1 - Last updated - 2011-12-16 ER - TY - GEN T1 - Teacher's Packet to the Golden Spike National Historic Site. AN - 62163496; ED479234 AB - One reason the Mormons, who wanted to be left alone, migrated to the Utah territory was its isolation. But that changed in 1869, when the new transcontinental railroad came to Utah. The completion of the transcontinental railroad not only made it easier to transport people and goods across the country, it also put an end to the hard work of thousands of immigrant workers and U.S. citizens who constructed the railroad. Its completion was cause for much celebration, which is why the Golden Spike Ceremony took place. This teacher's packet contains 18 exercises: (1) "How the Transcontinental Railroad Affected Utah"; (2) "Worksheet"; (3) "Reenactment of the Golden Spike Ceremony"; (4) "Script for 4th through 6th Grade"; (5) "Script for 7th through 9th Grade"; (6) "The First Transcontinental Railroad"; (7) "History Page"; (8) "Word Search"; (9) "Word Search Answer Key"; (10) "Worksheet" (for older students); (11) "Worksheet" (for younger students); (12) "Locomotive Operations Page"; (13) "Locomotive Diagram and Worksheet"; (14) "Locomotive Diagram Answer Key"; (15) "Locomotive Crossword Puzzle"; (16 "Answer Key"; (17) "Fun Pages"; and (18) "Pages to Color". (BT) Y1 - 2002/03// PY - 2002 DA - March 2002 SP - 51 PB - Golden Spike National Historic Site, P.O. Box 897, Brigham City, UT 84302. Tel: 435-471-2209; Web site: http://www.nps.gov/gosp/home.html. For full text: http://www.nps.gov/gosp/research/teacher_index.html. KW - Mormons KW - Utah KW - ERIC, Resources in Education (RIE) KW - Practitioners KW - Teachers KW - Intermediate Grades KW - Heritage Education KW - Rail Transportation KW - Social Studies KW - Language Arts KW - Middle Schools KW - Educational Games KW - Student Educational Objectives KW - Primary Sources KW - Curriculum Enrichment KW - Geography KW - United States History KW - Historic Sites UR - http://libproxy.lib.unc.edu/login?url=http://search.proquest.com/docview/62163496?accountid=14244 LA - English DB - ERIC N1 - Last updated - 2017-02-24 ER - TY - BOOK T1 - Acoustic Doppler Velocity Measurements Collected Near the Southern Nevada Water System Intake, Lake Mead, Nevada AN - 21000935; 7322186 AB - The Southern Nevada Water Authority requested the Bureau of Reclamation's Water Resources Research Laboratory to collect acoustic Doppler velocity profiles near the Southern Nevada Water System's intake on Saddle Island to determine its withdrawal characteristics from Lake Mead for stratified and destratified reservoir conditions. Understanding the withdrawal characteristics is important to the operations of the Southern Nevada Water System's water treatment facilities. JF - Acoustic Doppler Velocity Measurements Collected Near the Southern Nevada Water System Intake, Lake Mead, Nevada. [np]. Mar 2002. AU - Vermeyen, T B Y1 - 2002/03// PY - 2002 DA - March 2002 PB - U.S. Department of the Interior, Bureau of Reclamation USA KW - ASFA 2: Ocean Technology Policy & Non-Living Resources; Water Resources Abstracts KW - Selective Withdrawal KW - Water reservoirs KW - Acoustics KW - Laboratories KW - Velocity KW - Water resources KW - USA, Mead L. KW - USA, Nevada KW - Freshwater KW - Reclamation KW - Lakes KW - Water treatment KW - Velocity profiles KW - Profiles KW - Land Reclamation KW - Reservoirs KW - Water authorities KW - Water Resources KW - Q2 09201:General KW - SW 3060:Water treatment and distribution UR - http://libproxy.lib.unc.edu/login?url=http://search.proquest.com/docview/21000935?accountid=14244 L2 - http://vb3lk7eb4t.search.serialssolutions.com/?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&rfr_id=info:sid/Water+Resources+Abstracts&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=report&rft.jtitle=&rft.atitle=&rft.au=&rft.aulast=&rft.aufirst=&rft.date=2001-01-01&rft.volume=&rft.issue=&rft.spage=&rft.isbn=&rft.btitle=NORTH+BAJA+PIPELINE+PROJECT%2C+ARIZONA+AND+CALIFORNIA+%28FERC+DOCKET+NOS.+CP01-2-000+AND+CP01-23-000.%29&rft.title=NORTH+BAJA+PIPELINE+PROJECT%2C+ARIZONA+AND+CALIFORNIA+%28FERC+DOCKET+NOS.+CP01-2-000+AND+CP01-23-000.%29&rft.issn=&rft_id=info:doi/ LA - English DB - ProQuest Environmental Science Collection N1 - Date revised - 2007-04-01 N1 - Last updated - 2016-12-21 ER - TY - RPRT T1 - DEVILS LAKE, NORTH DAKOTA, AN - 36410360; 9195 AB - PURPOSE: The implementation of a flood control plan to address the rising surface levels of Devils Lake in North Dakota is proposed. The study area encompasses approximately 3,800 square miles within the Devils Lake drainage basin and almost 900 miles of the Sheyenne River and the Red River of the North, extending into Canada. As of January 2002, the surface of Devils Lake was at elevation 1447.1 feet above mean sea level, which is near the high stage in recorded history. The lake has risen 25 feet over the past eight years. The waterbody is a terminal lake with no outlet at the current elevation. That lake has naturally spilled into the Sheyenne River several times in geologic history. The last spill is estimated to have occurred 900 to 1,200 years ago. Due to lake level rises, more than 500 homes have been destroyed or relocated and over $350 million in federal emergency funding has been expended to relocate residents, raise roads, and build levees to combat the flooding. Structural and nonstructural alternatives to reduce urban, infrastructure, and agricultural flood damage were developed, including upper basin storage and various infrastructure protection measures. A number of structural outlet alternatives were considered. After consideration, four alternatives, including a No Action Alternative, have been carried forward for consideration in this draft EIS. The preliminarily selected alternative would involve construction of a 300-cubic-foot-per-second outlet at Pelican Lake. The facility would consist of pumping plants, an open channel, and a buried pipeline. More specifically, the project would involve provision of an open channel extending 6.1 miles from Pelican Lake to the north side of Minnewaukan; a pump station located on the north side of Minnewaukan to convey water through a pressure pipeline; three 48-inch-diameter pipes extending 3.3 miles from the pump station to the south-southwest; a single 84-inch-diameter reinforced concrete pressure pipe extending 4.2 miles from the above-mentioned pipeline to the divide between the Devils Lake basin and the Sheyenne River basin; a reservoir for transition from pressure pipeline to gravity pipeline flows and for discharge control for the outlet to the Sheyenne River; seven miles of reinforced concrete pressure pipe, generally following the alignment of Peterson Coulee, discharging into the Sheyenne River; a channel between Dry Lake and Big Coulee; minor modifications to Highways 19 and 281; acquisition of permanent interests at monitoring sites along the Sheyenne River; and small gauging stations upstream and downstream of the outlet pipe on the Sheyenne River. Cost of the Pelican Lake 300-cfs outlet is estimated at $97.7 million, and the benefit-cost ratio is estimated at 0.37. POSITIVE IMPACTS: The outlet and associated facilities would allow for the conveyance of water that would normally backup in Devils Lake to the Sheyenne River, thereby preventing future flooding around the lake shoreline and downstream along the Sheyenne River. Prevention of natural overflow of the lake through use of the controlled outlet would also preclude the possibility of releases of water containing extraordinarily high levels of sulfate into the Sheyenne River below the lake. NEGATIVE IMPACTS: There is a 50 percent chance that the lake level would remain steady regardless of the project, obviating the need for the project and rendering the expenditure on the project a total loss. The outlet would have only a limited effecton lake levels. The use of the outlet would raise sulfate and salinity levels in the river, potentially affecting a source of drinking and irrigation water. Salinity levels in soils downstream of the lake would also increase. Outlet facilities would mar visual aesthetics in the area. Approximately 133 acres of farmland would be displaced. The decline in lake levels would have a deleterious effect on spawning and nursery habitat. River stage increases could affect 112,000 acres of riparian lands along the Sheyenne River as well as associated cultural resources. All impacts affecting the Sheyenne River would affect the Fort Totten Indian Reservation, residents of which have expressed opposition to the outlet. Minnesota and Canada have expressed opposition to the outlet for water quality and biota transfer reasons. LEGAL MANDATES: Emergency Supplemental Act of 2000 (P.L. 106-246), Emergency Supplemental Appropriations Act of 1997 for Recovery from Natural Disasters, and for Overseas Peacekeeping Efforts (P.L 105-18), Energy and Water Development Appropriation Act of 1998 (P.L. 105-62), Energy and Water Development Appropriation Act of 1999 (P.L. 105-245), Energy and Water Development Appropriation Act of 2000 (P.L. 106-60), Energy and Water Development Appropriation Act of 2001 (P.L. 106-377), and Federal Water Pollution Control Act of 1972 (33 U.S.C. 1251 et seq.), JF - EPA number: 020080, Draft EIS--452 pages, Appendices--631 pages, February 27, 2002 PY - 2002 KW - Water KW - Channels KW - Cost Assessments KW - Diversion Structures KW - Dredging KW - Farmlands KW - Fish KW - Flood Control KW - Highways KW - Indian Reservations KW - Lakes KW - Hydraulic Assessments KW - Hydrologic Assessments KW - Pipelines KW - Reservoirs KW - Rivers KW - Salinity KW - Section 404(b) Statements KW - Visual Resources KW - Water Quality KW - Water Quality Assessments KW - Water Supply KW - Wetlands KW - Wildlife Habitat KW - Canada KW - Devils Lake KW - Minnesota KW - North Dakota KW - Red River of the North KW - Sheyenne River KW - Emergency Supplemental Act of 2000, Project Authorization KW - Emergency Supplemental Appropriations Act of 1997 for Recovery from Natural Disasters, and for Overseas Peacekeeping Efforts, Project Authorization KW - Energy and Water Development Appropriation Act of 1998, Project Authorization KW - Energy and Water Development Appropriation Act of 1999, Project Authorization KW - Energy and Water Development Appropriation Act of 2000, Project Authorization UR - http://libproxy.lib.unc.edu/login?url=http://search.proquest.com/docview/36410360?accountid=14244 L2 - http://vb3lk7eb4t.search.serialssolutions.com/?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&rfr_id=info:sid/Environmental+Impact+Statements%3A+Digests&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=report&rft.jtitle=&rft.atitle=&rft.au=&rft.aulast=&rft.aufirst=&rft.date=2001-01-01&rft.volume=24&rft.issue=8&rft.spage=10&rft.isbn=&rft.btitle=&rft.title=CRM+%28Washington%2C+D.C.%29&rft.issn=10684999&rft_id=info:doi/ LA - English DB - ProQuest Environmental Science Collection N1 - Name - Department of the Army, Corps of Engineers, St. Paul, Minnesota; ARMY N1 - Date revised - 2006-05-01 N1 - SuppNotes - Draft. Preparation date: February 27, 2002 N1 - Last updated - 2011-12-16 ER - TY - RPRT T1 - NEWMONT MINING COMPANY LEEVILLE PROJECT, ELKO AND EUREKA COUNTY, NEVADA. AN - 36410010; 9188 AB - PURPOSE: The development of an underground gold mine, to be known as the Leeville Project, at a site in the Carlin Trend approximately 20 miles northwest of Carlin in Eureka County, Nevada is proposed. The Newmont Mining Company submitted a plan of operations for the mine in April 1997. The mine would involve the sinking of five shafts to a depth of approximately 2,500 feet from the suface to access three main ore bodies. Ancillary mine facilities developed to support underground operations would include shaft hoists, a waste rock disposal facility, a refractory ore stockpile, facilities to support backfill of mined-out stopes, installation and operation of mine dewatering wells, a water treatment plant, and a pipeline /canal system to discharge excess mine water to existing infiltration and irrigation systems in the Boulder Valley. Ore and waste rock would be drilled, blasted, and hoisted to the surface. Most mined-out stopes would be backfilled with cemented rockfill. Development waste rock would be used for stope backfill whenever possible. Ore would be hauled directly to processing facilities at the refractory ore treatment plant located at Newmont's South Operations Area or placed in a refractory ore stockpile approximately 0.5 mile west of the production shaft. Temporary refractory ore stockpiles would be developed in accordance with Newmont's Refractory Ore Stockpile and Waste Rock Dump Design, Construction, and Monitoring Plan. All facilities and surface disturbance would be reclaimed following completion of mining activities. The mine would have a project life of 18 years, during which 18 million tons of ore and waste rock would be generated. In addition to the proposed action and a No Action Alternative, this draft EIS analyzes three alternatives, including: A) eliminate the canal portion of the water discharge facilities; B) backfilling of shafts; and C) relocation of the waste rock disposal facility and refractory ore stockpile. The preferred alternative incorporates portions of the proposed action and all three action alternatives. POSITIVE IMPACTS: The mine would produce a substantial amount of gold, contributing to the nation's reserves of this precious metal. Water removed during dewatering of the mine would be put to beneficial use as irrigation water. The project would continue to provide direct and indirect employment opportunities and result in continue tax base contributions. NEGATIVE IMPACTS: Aproximately 486 acres of soil and rangeland vegetation and the associated wildlife habitat and recreational resource would be disturbed by mining activities, including 33 acres of private land and 453 acres of public land. Grazing opportunities would be lost on 264 acres providing 36 animal unit months of forage. Noxious weeds could invade the disturbed area. Habitat for federally protected gashawks, burrowing owls, sage grouse, and ferruginous hawks would be affected by mining. Lahontan cutthroat trout, springsnails, spotted frogs, and California floaters have not been documented in any stream segments directly impacted by the project, but some of these species could be located in the overall drawdown area. Potential discharge of acidic water from waste rock disposal facilities could threaten soil and groundwater. Removal of groundwater via dewatering wells would increase the depth of aquifer drawdown already occurring due to mining elsewhere in the area and delay restoration of 70 acres of wetlands and riparian zones potentially impacted by existing dewatering activities in the Carlin Trend. Stream flow and related fish habitat recovery would also be delayed due to dewatering. Though 31 cultural resource sites are located in the area, none are eligible for inclusion in the National Register of Historic Places. LEGAL MANDATES: Federal Land Policy and Management Act of 1976 (43 U.S.C. 1701 et seq.), Federal Water Pollution Control Act of 1972 (33 U.S.C. 1251 et seq.), General Mining Law of 1872, as amended (30 U.S.C. 21 et seq.), and Mining and Minerals Policy Act of 1970 (30 U.S.C. 21a). JF - EPA number: 020073, 327 pages and maps, February 21, 2002 PY - 2002 KW - Land Use KW - Agency number: DES-02-6 KW - Acids KW - Birds KW - Cultural Resources KW - Employment KW - Endangered Species (Animals) KW - Farmlands KW - Fish KW - Grazing KW - Irrigation KW - Metals KW - Mining KW - Mines KW - Pipelines KW - Ranges KW - Reclamation KW - Recreation Resources KW - Tailings KW - Vegetation KW - Waste Disposal KW - Water Quality KW - Wetlands KW - Wildlife Habitat KW - Nevada KW - Federal Land Policy and Management Act of 1976, Compliance KW - Federal Water Pollution Control Act of 1972, Section 404 Permits KW - General Mining Law of 1872, Compliance KW - Mining and Minerals Policy Act of 1970, Compliance UR - http://libproxy.lib.unc.edu/login?url=http://search.proquest.com/docview/36410010?accountid=14244 L2 - http://vb3lk7eb4t.search.serialssolutions.com/?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&rfr_id=info:sid/Environmental+Impact+Statements%3A+Digests&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=report&rft.jtitle=&rft.atitle=&rft.au=&rft.aulast=&rft.aufirst=&rft.date=2002-02-21&rft.volume=&rft.issue=&rft.spage=&rft.isbn=&rft.btitle=NEWMONT+MINING+COMPANY+LEEVILLE+PROJECT%2C+ELKO+AND+EUREKA+COUNTY%2C+NEVADA.&rft.title=NEWMONT+MINING+COMPANY+LEEVILLE+PROJECT%2C+ELKO+AND+EUREKA+COUNTY%2C+NEVADA.&rft.issn=&rft_id=info:doi/ LA - English DB - ProQuest Environmental Science Collection N1 - Name - Department of the Interior, Bureau of Land Management, Elko, Nevada; DOI N1 - Date revised - 2006-05-01 N1 - SuppNotes - Draft. Preparation date: February 21, 2002 N1 - Last updated - 2011-12-16 ER - TY - RPRT T1 - LOWER SNAKE RIVER JUVENILE SALMON MIGRATION, WASHINGTON. AN - 36422083; 9187 AB - PURPOSE: The implementation of a plan to improve juvenile salmon passage in the lower Snake River in Washington is proposed. The existing hydrosystem facilities of the Lower Snake River Project are the Lower Granite, Lower Monumental, and Ice Harbor dams and reservoirs. These are multiple-use facilities providing for inland waterway navigation, hydropower generation, irrigation, recreation, and fish and wildlife enhancement. Project facilities include dams and reservoirs, hydroelectric power plants, transmission lines, navigation channels and locks, juvenile and adult fish passage structures, fish hatcheries, parks and recreational facilities, lands dedicated to project operations, and areas set aside as wildlife habitat. The project was originally designed and constructed with adult passage facilities at the four dams, and juvenile passage facilities were provided shortly after the dams were constructed. Options considered over the years have included reservoir drawdown, alteration of turbine operations, spills for juvenile salmon passage, gas abatement measures to prevent gas supersaturation lethal to salmon during runs, flow augmentation, fish hatcheries, surface bypass collectors. Four alternatives, including a No Action Alternative (Alternative 1), are considered in this final EIS. Alternative 2 would continue existing hydrosystem operations and maximum transport of juvenile salmon, but without surface collectors. Alternative 3, the preferred alternative, would continue the existing hydrosystem operations and maximum transport of juvenile salmon, but with major system improvements that could be accomplished without drawdowns. Alternative 4 would involve drawdown of the four lower Snake River Reservoirs to restore natural river conditions. Alternative 4 would involve breaching of all four dams. POSITIVE IMPACTS: Breaching of the dams would restore the river to its natural condition, allowing juvenile salmon to pass freely up and down the river. Other action alternatives would provide for varying levels of enhanced fish passage to a lesser degree. Retention of the dams would allow their continued use for economic and recreational purposes. NEGATIVE IMPACTS: Breaching of the dams would eliminate the economic and recreational benefits provided by dam operations and degrade area aesthetics in the near-term. Erosion caused by reservoir operations would add sediment to the river basin. Falling water at river system dams would continue to contribute to dissolved gas supersaturation. Blowing dust generated by exposed reservoir sediments would add to ambient dust from other sources. LEGAL MANDATES: Endangered Species Act of 1973, as amended (16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.), Federal Water Pollution Control Act of 1972 (33 U.S.C. 1251 et seq.), Fish and Wildlife Coordination Act of 1958 (P.L. 85-624), Flood Control Act of 1970 (P.L. 91-611), Pacific Northwest Electric Power Planning and Conservation Act of 1980 (P.L. 96-501), Public Law 79-14, River and Harbor Act of 1945, Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (P.L. 99-662), and Water Supply Act. PRIOR REFERENCES: For the abstract of the draft EIS, see 00-0242D, Volume 24, Number 2. JF - EPA number: 020072, Summary--52 pages, Part I--300 pages, Part II--529 pages, Appendix A--297 pages, Appendix B--272 pages, Appendix C--142 pages, Appendix D--345 pages and maps, Appendix F--422 pages and maps, Appendices F-H--322 pages and maps, Appendix I--336 pages and maps, Appendix J--132 pages and maps, Appendix K--26 pages and maps, Appendix L--314 pages, Appendix N-P--278 pages and maps, Appendix Q-T--261 pages, Appendix S--105 pages (oversize), Appendix U--297 pages, CD-ROM, February 19, 2002 PY - 2002 KW - Parks, Refuges and Forests KW - Cultural Resources Surveys KW - Dams KW - Electric Power KW - Erosion KW - Fish KW - Fisheries Surveys KW - Historic Sites KW - Hydraulic Assessments KW - Hydrologic Assessments KW - Hydrology KW - Impact Assessment Methodology KW - Irrigation KW - Navigation KW - Recreation Resources KW - Reservoirs KW - Rivers KW - Section 404(b) Statements KW - Sediment KW - Socioeconomic Assessments KW - Water Quality KW - Water Quality Assessments KW - Wildlife Management KW - Snake River KW - Washington KW - Endangered Species Act of 1973, Compliance KW - Federal Water Pollution Control Act of 1972, Section 404 Permits KW - Fish and Wildlife Coordination Act of 1958, Compliance KW - Flood Control Act of 1970, Project Authorization KW - Pacific Northwest Electric Power Planning and Conservation Act of 1980, Compliance UR - http://libproxy.lib.unc.edu/login?url=http://search.proquest.com/docview/36422083?accountid=14244 L2 - http://vb3lk7eb4t.search.serialssolutions.com/?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&rfr_id=info:sid/Environmental+Impact+Statements%3A+Digests&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=report&rft.jtitle=&rft.atitle=&rft.au=&rft.aulast=&rft.aufirst=&rft.date=2002-02-19&rft.volume=&rft.issue=&rft.spage=&rft.isbn=&rft.btitle=LOWER+SNAKE+RIVER+JUVENILE+SALMON+MIGRATION%2C+WASHINGTON.&rft.title=LOWER+SNAKE+RIVER+JUVENILE+SALMON+MIGRATION%2C+WASHINGTON.&rft.issn=&rft_id=info:doi/ LA - English DB - ProQuest Environmental Science Collection N1 - Name - Department of the Army, Corps of Engineers, Walla Walla, Washington; ARMY N1 - Date revised - 2006-05-01 N1 - SuppNotes - Final. Preparation date: February 19, 2002 N1 - Last updated - 2011-12-16 ER - TY - RPRT T1 - WALLULA POWER PROJECT AND WALLULA-MCNARY TRANSMISSION LINE PROJECT, WALLA WALLA COUNTY, WASHINGTON. [Part 1 of 1] T2 - WALLULA POWER PROJECT AND WALLULA-MCNARY TRANSMISSION LINE PROJECT, WALLA WALLA COUNTY, WASHINGTON. AN - 36382203; 9186-020071_0001 AB - PURPOSE: The construction and operation of a 1,300-megawatt (MW) natural gas-fired, combined-cycle combustion gas turbine generator in the northwestern portion of Walla Walla County, Washington are proposed. The Western Systems Coordinating Council forecasts a 2.1 percent per year increase in peak power demand between 1999 and 2009 for the Nothwest Power Pool, which includes Washington, Oregon, Idaho, and Utah as well as the Canadian provinces of British Columbia and Alberta and portions of Montana, Wyoming, Nevada, and California. the Northwest Power Planning Council predicts a 24 percent probability of one or more "generatin insufficiency events" in the Northwest by 2003. These projections suggest a shortfall future energy supply of between 3,000 and 6,000 MW. The 175.48-acre Wallula Power Project site lies eight miles south of the city of Pasco, two miles north of the unincorporated community of Wallula, and seven miles southeast of the unincorporated community of Burbank. The plant itself would require 97 acres within the site. The power plant would consist of two independent 650-MW power blocks with backup systems to maintain overall plant reliability and availability. Natural gas would be burned to fuel a gas turbine engine that would drive a generatorr to produce electrical energy. Hot exhausst gas produced by the combustion turbine would be used to boil water in a heat recovery steam generator (HRSG). Steam produced by the HRSG would turn another turbine generator to produce additional electrical energy. Exhaust steam exiting each turbine would be directedd into a water-cooled condenser, where it would be cooled until it condensed back into water. The condensate would drain into a collection tank, then pumped from the tank back to the two HRSGs, where it would again be used to generate steam. Natural gas would be supplied to the project site via a 5.9-mile pipeline interconnection constructed and operated by PG&E Gas Transmission-Northwest. Makeup water would be supplied via a 4.6-mile pipeline extending from the existing 10 Boise Cascade Corporatioin fiber farm water wells. Firm transmission of power generated by the project would require construction of a new 500-kilovolt transmission line and a switchyard near Smiths Harbor and upgrading of the existing McNary Substation. Approximately 5.1 miles of new transmission line would extend from the proposed generataion plant to the new switchyard, and approximately 28 miles of new transmission line would be provided adjacent to an existing line from the Smiths Harbor Switchyard to the McNary Substation. In addition to the proposed action and a No Action Alternative, transmission line design and alignment options are also considered in this draft EIS. POSITIVE IMPACTS: The generator would provide low-cost energy to meet the growing needs of the Pacific Northwest and other interconnected electric transmission areas where electric energy is in demand. NEGATIVE IMPACTS: Project facilities would lie in an area characterized by seismic activity. Generation of power would result in the release of particulate matter in nonattainment area for this pollutant. To offset the production of 303 tons of particulates per year, the operator of the plant would acquire 1,300 acres of active farmland and retire if for agricultural use. Groundwater pumping could exacerbate drawdown at the Iowa Beef Processors well. Approximately 1,700 acres of cottonwood plantation and irrigation cropland would be purchased or leased as part of water rights acquisitions for the plant, resulting in the conversion of this land to dryland grasses /shrubs, fallow land, or grazing land for the life of the project. Halting of irrigation on the project site could have indirect impacts on wetlands. Transmission towers could discourage recreational users of the Wallula Habitat Management Unit and Wanaket Wildlife Area. Hazardous materials, including amonia, would be used at the site. LEGAL MANDATES: Bonneville Project Act of 1937 (16 U.S.C. 832(a) et seq.). JF - EPA number: 020071, Draft EIS--621 pages and maps, Appendices-267 pages and maps, February 15, 2002 PY - 2002 VL - 1 KW - Energy KW - Agency number: DOE/EIS-0330 KW - Air Quality Standards Violations KW - Cultural Resources Assessments KW - Electric Generators KW - Electric Power KW - Farmlands KW - Grazing KW - Hazardous Materials KW - Health Hazard Analyses KW - Impact Assessment Methodology KW - Land Acquisitions KW - Leasing KW - Natural Gas KW - Particulates KW - Power Plants KW - Recreation Resources KW - Seismic Surveys KW - Transmission Lines KW - Visual Resources KW - Visual Resources Surveys KW - Wells KW - Wetlands KW - Wildlife Surveys KW - Washington KW - Bonneville Project Act of 1937, Project Authorization UR - http://libproxy.lib.unc.edu/login?url=http://search.proquest.com/docview/36382203?accountid=14244 L2 - http://vb3lk7eb4t.search.serialssolutions.com/?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&rfr_id=info:sid/Environmental+Impact+Statements%3A+Full+Text&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=report&rft.jtitle=&rft.atitle=&rft.au=&rft.aulast=&rft.aufirst=J&rft.date=2000-12-31&rft.volume=&rft.issue=&rft.spage=&rft.isbn=&rft.btitle=&rft.title=&rft.issn=&rft_id=info:doi/ LA - English DB - ProQuest Environmental Science Collection N1 - Name - Department of Energy, Bonneville Power Administration, Portland, Oregon; DOE N1 - Date revised - 2006-05-01 N1 - SuppNotes - Draft. Preparation date: February 15, 2002 N1 - Last updated - 2011-12-16 ER - TY - RPRT T1 - MONTANA STATEWISE DRAFT OIL AND GAS ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT AND AMENDMENT OF THE POWDER RIVER AND BILLINGS RESOURCES MANAGEMENT PLANS. AN - 36412552; 9175 AB - PURPOSE: The implementation of a plan for the management of federal and state coalbed methane gas (CBM) administered by the Miles City and Billings field offices of the Bureau of Land Management and the state of Montana are proposed. The plan would address resource manaegment in the Powder River Resource Management Plan (RMP) Area, including Powder River, Carter, and Treasure counties and portions of Big Horn, Custer, and Rosebud counties, and the Billings RMP Area, includign Carbon, Golden Valley, Musselshell, Stillwter, Sweet Grass, Wheatland and Yellowstone counties and the remaining poertion of Big Horn County. The combined planning area encompasses 1.5 million acres of federally managed surface and 5.0 million acres of federal ineral estate. Five alternatives, including a No Action Alternative (Alternative A), are considered in this draft EIS. The preferred alternative (Alternative E) would allow for CBM exploration and development on federal, state, and/or fee mineral resource areas subject to agency decisions, lease stipulations, permit requirements, and surface owner agreements. Operators would be required to submit a project plan outlining the proposed development of an area when requesting CBM well densities greater than one well per 640 acres. All shallow coal seams would have vertical wells installed. For deeper coal seams, the operator would drill directionally or demonstrate in the project plan why directional drilling was not necessary or feasible. Operators would develop single or multiple coal seams per their plans; however, there would be only one well bore per coal seem per designated spacing restriction. Operators would be required to demonstrate in their project plan how impacts to surface resources would be minimized or mitigated. Stipulations regarding release of water during dewatering and release of air pollutants from equipment would also be incorporated into the plans. All mining areas would be reclaimed. POSITIVE IMPACTS: The CBM produced in the area would provide a substantial energy resource, reducing the nation's dependence on foreign sources of oil and natural gas. Exploration and production activities would employ local workers and otherwise contribute to the local and regional economies in the area. NEGATIVE IMPACTS: Development facilities would displace wildlife habitat and farmland and could affect cultural resources. Discharges of sodium could damage soil and degrade water quality in surface and groundwater flows. Compressors and other equipment would generate air pollutants and noise. Transmission lines associated with resource development would mar visual aesthetics in the area. Monitoring wells would be required on land that abuts a Native American reservation. Well development could result in drawdown of the local aquifer. LEGAL MANDATES: Federal Land Policy and Management Act of 1976 (43 U.S.C. 1701 et seq.). JF - EPA number: 020060, 517 pages, February 7, 2002 PY - 2002 KW - Energy KW - Agency number: BLM/MT/PL-02/003 KW - Air Quality KW - Coal KW - Drilling KW - Hydrologic Assessments KW - Impact Monitoring Plans KW - Indian Reservations KW - Leasing KW - Mineral Resources KW - Mineral Resources Management KW - Mining KW - Natural Gas KW - Socioeconomic Assessments KW - Soils Surveys KW - Transmission Lines KW - Vegetation Surveys KW - Visual Resources KW - Water Quality KW - Wells KW - Wildlife Surveys KW - Montana KW - Powder River KW - Federal Land Policy and Management Act of 1976, Compliance UR - http://libproxy.lib.unc.edu/login?url=http://search.proquest.com/docview/36412552?accountid=14244 L2 - http://vb3lk7eb4t.search.serialssolutions.com/?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&rfr_id=info:sid/Environmental+Impact+Statements%3A+Digests&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=report&rft.jtitle=&rft.atitle=&rft.au=&rft.aulast=&rft.aufirst=&rft.date=2002-02-07&rft.volume=&rft.issue=&rft.spage=&rft.isbn=&rft.btitle=MONTANA+STATEWISE+DRAFT+OIL+AND+GAS+ENVIRONMENTAL+IMPACT+STATEMENT+AND+AMENDMENT+OF+THE+POWDER+RIVER+AND+BILLINGS+RESOURCES+MANAGEMENT+PLANS.&rft.title=MONTANA+STATEWISE+DRAFT+OIL+AND+GAS+ENVIRONMENTAL+IMPACT+STATEMENT+AND+AMENDMENT+OF+THE+POWDER+RIVER+AND+BILLINGS+RESOURCES+MANAGEMENT+PLANS.&rft.issn=&rft_id=info:doi/ LA - English DB - ProQuest Environmental Science Collection N1 - Name - Department of the Interior, Bureau of Land Management, Billings, Montana; DOI N1 - Date revised - 2006-05-01 N1 - SuppNotes - Draft. Preparation date: February 7, 2002 N1 - Last updated - 2011-12-16 ER - TY - JOUR T1 - Economic prefeasibility studies of mining in the Koyukuk mining district, Northern Alaska AN - 52041047; 2003-000151 AB - Mining and processing cost analyses were conducted on nine mineral development scenarios for the Koyukuk Mining District study. The district is located on the upper portion of the Koyukuk River basin. Resources and recoverable metal values (RMV) needed to make these deposits yield a 15% Discounted Cash-Flow Rate-Of-Return (DCFROR) were modeled. Economic modeling for surface-mined placer gold deposits indicated the RMV ranged from $18.43 per loose cubic yard (lcy) for a 243 loose cubic yards per day (lcy/d) operation to $4.23/lcy for a 1,941 lcy/d operation supported by a 10-mile (mi) road. The RMV ranged from $25.49/lcy for a 243 lcy/d operation to $4.84/lcy for a 1,941 lcy/d operation supported by a 50 mi road. The RMV ranged from $35.05/lcy for a 243 lcy/d operation to $5.63/lcy for a 1,941 lcy/d operation supported by a 100 mi road. The RMV ranged from $18.35/lcy for a 243 lcy/d operation to $4.62/lcy for a 1,941 lcy/d air supported operation approximately 200 mi from Fairbanks. Modeling for surface-mined placer gold deposits indicated the RMV ranged from $16.82/lcy for a 243 lcy/d operation to $4.11/lcy for a 1,941 lcy/d operation supported by a 10 mi winter trail. The RMV ranged from $17.61/lcy for a 243 lcy/d operation to $4.18/lcy for a 1,941 lcy/d operation supported by a 50 mi winter trail. The RMV ranged from $18.55/lcy for a 243 lcy/d operation to $4.30/lcy for a 1,941 lcy/d operation supported by a 100 mi winter trail. Modeling for underground-mined placer gold deposits indicated the RMV ranged from $19.73/lcy for a 243 lcy/d operation to $6.41/lcy for a 1,941 lcy/d operation supported by a 10 mi road. The RMV ranged from $26.82/lcy for a 243 lcy/d operation to $7.04/lcy for a 1,941 lcy/d 1,941 lcy/d operation supported by a 50 mi road. The RMV ranged from $36.04/lcy for a 243 lcy/d operation to $7.82/lcy for a 1,941 lcy/d operation supported by a 100 mi road. The RMV ranged from $18.19/lcy for a 243 lcy/d operation to $6.33/lcy for a 1,941 lcy/d air supported operation approximately 200 mi from Fairbanks. Modeling for underground-mined placer gold deposits indicated the RMV ranged from $18.19/lcy for a 243 lcy/d operation to $6.28/lcy for a 1,941 lcy/d operation supported by a 10 mi winter trail. RMV ranged from $18.86/lcy for a 243 lcy/d operation to $6.37/lcy for a 1,941 lcy/d operation supported by a 50 mi winter trail. The RMV ranged from $19.99/lcy for a 243 lcy/d operation to $6.51/lcy for a 1,941 lcy/d operation supported by a 100 mi winter trail. Modeling indicated that for an increment in RMV ranging from $2.18/lcy for a 243 lcy/d operation to $0.25/lcy for a 1,941 lcy/d operation, a backhoe and laborer can be added to the gold placer mine models. Modeling for copper porphyry deposits indicated the RMV ranged from $90 per short ton (st) for a 3,913 short tons per day (stpd) operation to $37/st for a 31,309 stpd operation. Modeling for copper skarn underground mines indicated the RMV ranged from $561/st for a 114 stpd operation to $299/st for a 912 stpd operation. Economic modeling for copper skarn surface mines indicated the RMV ranged from $455/st for a 114 stpd operation to $242/st for a 912 stpd operation. Modeling for mineralized quartz vein deposits indicated the RMV ranged from $2,688/st for a 4 stpd operation to $538/st for a 36 stpd operation with an on-site mill. The RMV ranged from $1,596/st for a 4 stpd operation to $502/st for a 36 stpd operation which shipped ore directly to a smelter. Modeling for massive sulfide deposits indicated the RMV ranged from $832/st for a 56 stpd operation to $368/st for a 452 stpd operation. JF - BLM - Alaska Technical Report AU - Coldwell, James R Y1 - 2002/02// PY - 2002 DA - February 2002 SP - 51 PB - U. S. Department of the Interior, Bureau of Land Management, Alaska State Office, Anchorage, AK KW - Type: site location maps KW - United States KW - mining KW - underground mining KW - transportation KW - mineral economics KW - production KW - evaluation KW - potential deposits KW - mining geology KW - metamorphic rocks KW - Koyukuk mining district KW - mineralization KW - gold ores KW - copper ores KW - skarn KW - mines KW - Koyukuk River basin KW - veins KW - cost KW - quartz veins KW - models KW - massive sulfide deposits KW - reserves KW - Northern Alaska KW - metal ores KW - massive deposits KW - Alaska KW - metasomatic rocks KW - 27A:Economic geology, geology of ore deposits UR - http://libproxy.lib.unc.edu/login?url=http://search.proquest.com/docview/52041047?accountid=14244 L2 - http://vb3lk7eb4t.search.serialssolutions.com/?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&rfr_id=info:sid/GeoRef&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=book&rft.jtitle=&rft.atitle=&rft.au=Coldwell%2C+James+R&rft.aulast=Coldwell&rft.aufirst=James&rft.date=2002-02-01&rft.volume=&rft.issue=&rft.spage=&rft.isbn=&rft.btitle=Economic+prefeasibility+studies+of+mining+in+the+Koyukuk+mining+district%2C+Northern+Alaska&rft.title=Economic+prefeasibility+studies+of+mining+in+the+Koyukuk+mining+district%2C+Northern+Alaska&rft.issn=&rft_id=info:doi/ L2 - http://www.blm.gov/ak/st/en/info/gen_pubs/tr.html LA - English DB - GeoRef N1 - Copyright - GeoRef, Copyright 2012, American Geosciences Institute. N1 - Date revised - 2003-01-01 N1 - Number of references - 62 N1 - PubXState - AK N1 - Document feature - illus. incl. 13 tables N1 - SuppNotes - Includes 2 appendices N1 - Last updated - 2012-06-07 N1 - CODEN - #04969 N1 - SubjectsTermNotLitGenreText - Alaska; copper ores; cost; evaluation; gold ores; Koyukuk mining district; Koyukuk River basin; massive deposits; massive sulfide deposits; metal ores; metamorphic rocks; metasomatic rocks; mineral economics; mineralization; mines; mining; mining geology; models; Northern Alaska; potential deposits; production; quartz veins; reserves; skarn; transportation; underground mining; United States; veins ER - TY - RPRT T1 - SCHULTZ-HANFORD AREA TRANSMISSION LINE PROJECT, WASHINGTON. AN - 36436935; 9165 AB - PURPOSE: The construction and operation of a 500-kilovolt (kV) transmission line in central Washington is proposed by the Bonneville Power Administration (BPA). The project would increase transmission system capacity north of Hanford. Since the mid-1990's, the transmission lines in central Washington have grown increasingly constrained. During spring and early summer months, the amount of power that needs to move through this area has exceeded the carrying capacity of the existing transmission lines. Not having enough transmission capacity can compromise safety and decrease transmission reliability. Four construction alternatives and a No Action Alternative are considered in this draft EIS. Each construction alternative begins at BPA's Schultz Substation approximately nine miles north of Ellensburg. The alternatives terminate in northern Benton County at one of two locations, namely, BPA's Hanford Substation or a new substation (Wautoma Substation) just east of the Benton REA Blackrock Substation. The preferred alternative (Alternative 2) would extend approximately 67 miles and terminate at the Wautoma Substation. Approximately 27 miles of the route would directly parallel an existing transmission line, with approximately eight of those miles being a rebuild of the existing line to double-circuit to hold both the existing and new transmission lines; this would reduce rights-of-way impacts and the need for new access roads through agricultural land and rangeland. New rights-of-way would be 150 feet wide throughout most of the corridor. New roads would be located within the right-of-way wherever possible. Some additions and modifications would occur at the Schultz Substation. The new Wautoma Substation would be placed two miles south of Highway 24 at the intersection of the new transmission line and the Hanford-Ostrander 500-kV and Hanford-John Day 500-kV lines. The new transmission system would be integrated into the BPA communications system. POSITIVE IMPACTS: The new transmission line would allow BPA to maintain transmission system reliability, optimize transmission system usage, minimize environmental impacts and costs, and meet a crucial system capacity deadlines in the area set for late 2004. NEGATIVE IMPACTS: The preferred alternative could affect 28 wetlands and would require placement of one structure within the Columbia River floodplain and construction of a new access road within the Caribou Creek floodplain. Habitat for Umtanum wild buckwheat, Ute ladies' tresses, northern wormwood, basalt daisy, and several BLM sensitive species. Two state-designated high-quality plant communities would be impacted. Moderately disturbed shrub-steppe habitat would also be distubed. Ten fish-bearing streams would be traversed. The new line would affect residential housing and quarry activities and traverse areas used for military exercises, farming, and the Columbia National Wildlife Refuge. The line would also mar visual aesthetics in areas traversed, including areas used by recreationists. A total of 36 sensitive archaeological areas could be affected. LEGAL MANDATES: National Environmental Policy Act of 1969, as amended (49 U.S.C. 303). JF - EPA number: 020049, Draft EIS--488 pages and maps, Appendices--217 pages, February 1, 2002 PY - 2002 KW - Energy KW - Archaeological Sites KW - Cultural Resources Assessments KW - Electric Power KW - Endangered Species (Plants) KW - Farmlands KW - Fish KW - Fisheries Surveys KW - Floodplains KW - Health Hazard Analyses KW - Recreation Resources KW - Transmission Lines KW - Vegetation Surveys KW - Visual Resources KW - Wetlands KW - Wildlife Surveys KW - Washington KW - National Environmental Policy Act of 1969, as amended, Complience UR - http://libproxy.lib.unc.edu/login?url=http://search.proquest.com/docview/36436935?accountid=14244 L2 - http://vb3lk7eb4t.search.serialssolutions.com/?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&rfr_id=info:sid/Environmental+Impact+Statements%3A+Digests&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=report&rft.jtitle=&rft.atitle=&rft.au=&rft.aulast=&rft.aufirst=&rft.date=2000-12-21&rft.volume=&rft.issue=&rft.spage=&rft.isbn=&rft.btitle=ACQUISITION+OF+ADDITIONAL+WATER+FOR+MEETING+THE+SAN+JOAQUIN+RIVER+AGREEMENT+FLOW+OBJECTIVES+2001-2010%3B+CALAVERAS%2C+MARIPOSA%2C+MERCED%2C+SAN+JOAQUIN%2C+STANISLAUS%2C+AND+TOULUMNE+COUNTIES%2C+CALIFORNIA+%28DRAFT+SUPPLEMENT+TO+THE+FINAL+ENVIRONMENTAL+IMPACT+STATEMENT+OF+JANUARY+1999%29.&rft.title=ACQUISITION+OF+ADDITIONAL+WATER+FOR+MEETING+THE+SAN+JOAQUIN+RIVER+AGREEMENT+FLOW+OBJECTIVES+2001-2010%3B+CALAVERAS%2C+MARIPOSA%2C+MERCED%2C+SAN+JOAQUIN%2C+STANISLAUS%2C+AND+TOULUMNE+COUNTIES%2C+CALIFORNIA+%28DRAFT+SUPPLEMENT+TO+THE+FINAL+ENVIRONMENTAL+IMPACT+STATEMENT+OF+JANUARY+1999%29.&rft.issn=&rft_id=info:doi/ LA - English DB - ProQuest Environmental Science Collection N1 - Name - Department of Energy, Bonneville Power Administration, Portland, Oregon; DA N1 - Date revised - 2006-05-01 N1 - SuppNotes - Draft. Preparation date: February 1, 2002 N1 - Last updated - 2011-12-16 ER - TY - RPRT T1 - SCHULTZ-HANFORD AREA TRANSMISSION LINE PROJECT, WASHINGTON. [Part 2 of 2] T2 - SCHULTZ-HANFORD AREA TRANSMISSION LINE PROJECT, WASHINGTON. AN - 36379515; 9165-020049_0002 AB - PURPOSE: The construction and operation of a 500-kilovolt (kV) transmission line in central Washington is proposed by the Bonneville Power Administration (BPA). The project would increase transmission system capacity north of Hanford. Since the mid-1990's, the transmission lines in central Washington have grown increasingly constrained. During spring and early summer months, the amount of power that needs to move through this area has exceeded the carrying capacity of the existing transmission lines. Not having enough transmission capacity can compromise safety and decrease transmission reliability. Four construction alternatives and a No Action Alternative are considered in this draft EIS. Each construction alternative begins at BPA's Schultz Substation approximately nine miles north of Ellensburg. The alternatives terminate in northern Benton County at one of two locations, namely, BPA's Hanford Substation or a new substation (Wautoma Substation) just east of the Benton REA Blackrock Substation. The preferred alternative (Alternative 2) would extend approximately 67 miles and terminate at the Wautoma Substation. Approximately 27 miles of the route would directly parallel an existing transmission line, with approximately eight of those miles being a rebuild of the existing line to double-circuit to hold both the existing and new transmission lines; this would reduce rights-of-way impacts and the need for new access roads through agricultural land and rangeland. New rights-of-way would be 150 feet wide throughout most of the corridor. New roads would be located within the right-of-way wherever possible. Some additions and modifications would occur at the Schultz Substation. The new Wautoma Substation would be placed two miles south of Highway 24 at the intersection of the new transmission line and the Hanford-Ostrander 500-kV and Hanford-John Day 500-kV lines. The new transmission system would be integrated into the BPA communications system. POSITIVE IMPACTS: The new transmission line would allow BPA to maintain transmission system reliability, optimize transmission system usage, minimize environmental impacts and costs, and meet a crucial system capacity deadlines in the area set for late 2004. NEGATIVE IMPACTS: The preferred alternative could affect 28 wetlands and would require placement of one structure within the Columbia River floodplain and construction of a new access road within the Caribou Creek floodplain. Habitat for Umtanum wild buckwheat, Ute ladies' tresses, northern wormwood, basalt daisy, and several BLM sensitive species. Two state-designated high-quality plant communities would be impacted. Moderately disturbed shrub-steppe habitat would also be distubed. Ten fish-bearing streams would be traversed. The new line would affect residential housing and quarry activities and traverse areas used for military exercises, farming, and the Columbia National Wildlife Refuge. The line would also mar visual aesthetics in areas traversed, including areas used by recreationists. A total of 36 sensitive archaeological areas could be affected. LEGAL MANDATES: National Environmental Policy Act of 1969, as amended (49 U.S.C. 303). JF - EPA number: 020049, Draft EIS--488 pages and maps, Appendices--217 pages, February 1, 2002 PY - 2002 VL - 2 KW - Energy KW - Archaeological Sites KW - Cultural Resources Assessments KW - Electric Power KW - Endangered Species (Plants) KW - Farmlands KW - Fish KW - Fisheries Surveys KW - Floodplains KW - Health Hazard Analyses KW - Recreation Resources KW - Transmission Lines KW - Vegetation Surveys KW - Visual Resources KW - Wetlands KW - Wildlife Surveys KW - Washington KW - National Environmental Policy Act of 1969, as amended, Complience UR - http://libproxy.lib.unc.edu/login?url=http://search.proquest.com/docview/36379515?accountid=14244 L2 - http://vb3lk7eb4t.search.serialssolutions.com/?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&rfr_id=info:sid/Environmental+Impact+Statements%3A+Full+Text&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=report&rft.jtitle=&rft.atitle=&rft.au=&rft.aulast=&rft.aufirst=&rft.date=2002-02-01&rft.volume=&rft.issue=&rft.spage=&rft.isbn=&rft.btitle=SCHULTZ-HANFORD+AREA+TRANSMISSION+LINE+PROJECT%2C+WASHINGTON.&rft.title=SCHULTZ-HANFORD+AREA+TRANSMISSION+LINE+PROJECT%2C+WASHINGTON.&rft.issn=&rft_id=info:doi/ LA - English DB - ProQuest Environmental Science Collection N1 - Name - Department of Energy, Bonneville Power Administration, Portland, Oregon; DA N1 - Date revised - 2006-05-01 N1 - SuppNotes - Draft. Preparation date: February 1, 2002 N1 - Last updated - 2011-12-16 ER - TY - RPRT T1 - SCHULTZ-HANFORD AREA TRANSMISSION LINE PROJECT, WASHINGTON. [Part 1 of 2] T2 - SCHULTZ-HANFORD AREA TRANSMISSION LINE PROJECT, WASHINGTON. AN - 36378418; 9165-020049_0001 AB - PURPOSE: The construction and operation of a 500-kilovolt (kV) transmission line in central Washington is proposed by the Bonneville Power Administration (BPA). The project would increase transmission system capacity north of Hanford. Since the mid-1990's, the transmission lines in central Washington have grown increasingly constrained. During spring and early summer months, the amount of power that needs to move through this area has exceeded the carrying capacity of the existing transmission lines. Not having enough transmission capacity can compromise safety and decrease transmission reliability. Four construction alternatives and a No Action Alternative are considered in this draft EIS. Each construction alternative begins at BPA's Schultz Substation approximately nine miles north of Ellensburg. The alternatives terminate in northern Benton County at one of two locations, namely, BPA's Hanford Substation or a new substation (Wautoma Substation) just east of the Benton REA Blackrock Substation. The preferred alternative (Alternative 2) would extend approximately 67 miles and terminate at the Wautoma Substation. Approximately 27 miles of the route would directly parallel an existing transmission line, with approximately eight of those miles being a rebuild of the existing line to double-circuit to hold both the existing and new transmission lines; this would reduce rights-of-way impacts and the need for new access roads through agricultural land and rangeland. New rights-of-way would be 150 feet wide throughout most of the corridor. New roads would be located within the right-of-way wherever possible. Some additions and modifications would occur at the Schultz Substation. The new Wautoma Substation would be placed two miles south of Highway 24 at the intersection of the new transmission line and the Hanford-Ostrander 500-kV and Hanford-John Day 500-kV lines. The new transmission system would be integrated into the BPA communications system. POSITIVE IMPACTS: The new transmission line would allow BPA to maintain transmission system reliability, optimize transmission system usage, minimize environmental impacts and costs, and meet a crucial system capacity deadlines in the area set for late 2004. NEGATIVE IMPACTS: The preferred alternative could affect 28 wetlands and would require placement of one structure within the Columbia River floodplain and construction of a new access road within the Caribou Creek floodplain. Habitat for Umtanum wild buckwheat, Ute ladies' tresses, northern wormwood, basalt daisy, and several BLM sensitive species. Two state-designated high-quality plant communities would be impacted. Moderately disturbed shrub-steppe habitat would also be distubed. Ten fish-bearing streams would be traversed. The new line would affect residential housing and quarry activities and traverse areas used for military exercises, farming, and the Columbia National Wildlife Refuge. The line would also mar visual aesthetics in areas traversed, including areas used by recreationists. A total of 36 sensitive archaeological areas could be affected. LEGAL MANDATES: National Environmental Policy Act of 1969, as amended (49 U.S.C. 303). JF - EPA number: 020049, Draft EIS--488 pages and maps, Appendices--217 pages, February 1, 2002 PY - 2002 VL - 1 KW - Energy KW - Archaeological Sites KW - Cultural Resources Assessments KW - Electric Power KW - Endangered Species (Plants) KW - Farmlands KW - Fish KW - Fisheries Surveys KW - Floodplains KW - Health Hazard Analyses KW - Recreation Resources KW - Transmission Lines KW - Vegetation Surveys KW - Visual Resources KW - Wetlands KW - Wildlife Surveys KW - Washington KW - National Environmental Policy Act of 1969, as amended, Complience UR - http://libproxy.lib.unc.edu/login?url=http://search.proquest.com/docview/36378418?accountid=14244 L2 - http://vb3lk7eb4t.search.serialssolutions.com/?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&rfr_id=info:sid/Environmental+Impact+Statements%3A+Full+Text&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=report&rft.jtitle=&rft.atitle=&rft.au=&rft.aulast=&rft.aufirst=&rft.date=2002-02-01&rft.volume=&rft.issue=&rft.spage=&rft.isbn=&rft.btitle=SCHULTZ-HANFORD+AREA+TRANSMISSION+LINE+PROJECT%2C+WASHINGTON.&rft.title=SCHULTZ-HANFORD+AREA+TRANSMISSION+LINE+PROJECT%2C+WASHINGTON.&rft.issn=&rft_id=info:doi/ LA - English DB - ProQuest Environmental Science Collection N1 - Name - Department of Energy, Bonneville Power Administration, Portland, Oregon; DA N1 - Date revised - 2006-05-01 N1 - SuppNotes - Draft. Preparation date: February 1, 2002 N1 - Last updated - 2011-12-16 ER - TY - RPRT T1 - TRUNK HIGHWAY (TH) 169 IN CROW WING AND MILLE LACS COUNTIES, MINNESOTA. AN - 36439533; 9162 AB - PURPOSE: The improvement of 22.7 miles of Trunk Highway (TH) 169 from TH 27 north of Onamia to the intersection of TH 18 and TH 6 northwest of the city of Barrison in Crow Wing and Mille Lacs counties, Minnesota is proposed. TH 169 is a major north-south highway within the Natinal Highway System, provides important linkage between Interstate 94 and the Twin Cities metropolitan area, north to the Central Lakes Region of Minnesota. It is also an important economic corridor connecting regional trade centers. Tourist travel along the study segment of TH 169 creates high season peaks that commonly cause substantial travel delays and unsafe driving conditions. The existing two-lane highway does not meet design standards for the type and volume of traffic it carries. Other highway characteristics demonstrating the need to improve TH 169 include high crash rates, a large number of direct access points, pedestrian safety hazards, and heavy congestion. The proposed improvements would include the construction of a four-lane limited-access highway between the project study termini. Six alternatives, including a No-Build Alternative (Alternative 1), are considered in this draft EIS. Build alternatives largely represent differences in alignment Depending on the build alternative selected, estimated cost of the project ranges from $100.5 million and $112.6 million and the benefit-cost ratio ranges from 0.6 to 2.4. POSITIVE IMPACTS: The project would increase the capacity of TH 169 and improve the facility's safety and design, maintaining movility and connectivity for highway users. NEGATIVE IMPACTS: Depending on the build alternative selected, rights-of-way requirements would result in the displacement of 210 to 1,100 acres of land overall, 51 to 88 residences, eight to 29 businesses, 0.5 to 17 acres of Tribal Trust land, 82.4 to 267 acres of wetlands, 37 to 69 prime farmland sites, and up to 1.5 acres of old-growth forest. Habitat for red-shoulder hawk, northern pike, bald eagles, and up to two state-listed protected plant species could be affected. Social impacts could include impacts to Native American community resources, burial sites, community accessibility, and the Onamia School complex. The faciity would encroach upon Kathio State Park and could affect Rum River State Forest, Pike Point boat landing/rest area, and the Garrison Concourse. Traffic-generated noise levels would exceed federal standards in the vicinity of 242 to 320 residential receptor sites during daytime hours and 401 to 469 residential receptor sites during nighttime hours. The increase in impervious surface would result in increased runoff that could affect sensitive lake ecologies in the corridor's drainage area. Two alternatives could affect the southern terminus of the Rum River, which is designated as a wild and scenic river. The project could affect five to 16 historic sites, three to 54 archaeological sites, the Kathio Historic District/National Historic Landmark, and the Mille Lacs Area Cultural Landscape. >From three to 11 mapped and an unknown number of unmapped contaminated sites would be encountered during construction. LEGAL MANDATES: Department of Transportation Act of 1966, as amended (49 U.S.C. 1651 et seq.), Federal Water Pollution Control Act of 1972 (33 U.S.C. 1251 et seq.), National Historic Preservation Act of 1966, as amended (16 U.S.C. 470 et seq.), and Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisition Policies Act of 1970 (42 U.S.C. 4601). JF - EPA number: 020046, 258 pages and maps, January 31, 2002 PY - 2002 KW - Roads and Railroads KW - Agency number: FHWA-MN-EIS-02-01-D KW - Archaeological Sites KW - Cemeteries KW - Cultural Resources KW - Endangered Species (Animals) KW - Endangered Species (Plants) KW - Farmlands KW - Fish KW - Forests KW - Highways KW - Historic Sites KW - Indian Reservations KW - Lakes KW - Noise Standards Violations KW - Parks KW - Recreation Facilities KW - Recreation Resources KW - Relocations-Property Acquisitions KW - Safety KW - Section 4(f) Statements KW - Water Quality KW - Wetlands KW - Wild and Scenic Rivers KW - Wildlife Habitat KW - Minnesota KW - Department of Transportation Act of 1966, Parks KW - Federal Water Pollution Control Act of 1972, Section 404 Permits KW - Federal Water Pollution Control Act of 1972, NPDES Permits KW - National Historic Preservation Act of 1966, Archaeological Sites KW - National Historic Preservation Act of 1966, Historic Sites UR - http://libproxy.lib.unc.edu/login?url=http://search.proquest.com/docview/36439533?accountid=14244 L2 - http://vb3lk7eb4t.search.serialssolutions.com/?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&rfr_id=info:sid/Environmental+Impact+Statements%3A+Digests&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=report&rft.jtitle=&rft.atitle=&rft.au=&rft.aulast=&rft.aufirst=&rft.date=2002-01-31&rft.volume=&rft.issue=&rft.spage=&rft.isbn=&rft.btitle=TRUNK+HIGHWAY+%28TH%29+169+IN+CROW+WING+AND+MILLE+LACS+COUNTIES%2C+MINNESOTA.&rft.title=TRUNK+HIGHWAY+%28TH%29+169+IN+CROW+WING+AND+MILLE+LACS+COUNTIES%2C+MINNESOTA.&rft.issn=&rft_id=info:doi/ LA - English DB - ProQuest Environmental Science Collection N1 - Name - Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration, St. Paul, Minnesota; DOT N1 - Date revised - 2006-05-01 N1 - SuppNotes - Draft. Preparation date: January 31, 2002 N1 - Last updated - 2011-12-16 ER - TY - RPRT T1 - TRUNK HIGHWAY (TH) 169 IN CROW WING AND MILLE LACS COUNTIES, MINNESOTA. [Part 1 of 1] T2 - TRUNK HIGHWAY (TH) 169 IN CROW WING AND MILLE LACS COUNTIES, MINNESOTA. AN - 36388068; 9162-020046_0001 AB - PURPOSE: The improvement of 22.7 miles of Trunk Highway (TH) 169 from TH 27 north of Onamia to the intersection of TH 18 and TH 6 northwest of the city of Barrison in Crow Wing and Mille Lacs counties, Minnesota is proposed. TH 169 is a major north-south highway within the Natinal Highway System, provides important linkage between Interstate 94 and the Twin Cities metropolitan area, north to the Central Lakes Region of Minnesota. It is also an important economic corridor connecting regional trade centers. Tourist travel along the study segment of TH 169 creates high season peaks that commonly cause substantial travel delays and unsafe driving conditions. The existing two-lane highway does not meet design standards for the type and volume of traffic it carries. Other highway characteristics demonstrating the need to improve TH 169 include high crash rates, a large number of direct access points, pedestrian safety hazards, and heavy congestion. The proposed improvements would include the construction of a four-lane limited-access highway between the project study termini. Six alternatives, including a No-Build Alternative (Alternative 1), are considered in this draft EIS. Build alternatives largely represent differences in alignment Depending on the build alternative selected, estimated cost of the project ranges from $100.5 million and $112.6 million and the benefit-cost ratio ranges from 0.6 to 2.4. POSITIVE IMPACTS: The project would increase the capacity of TH 169 and improve the facility's safety and design, maintaining movility and connectivity for highway users. NEGATIVE IMPACTS: Depending on the build alternative selected, rights-of-way requirements would result in the displacement of 210 to 1,100 acres of land overall, 51 to 88 residences, eight to 29 businesses, 0.5 to 17 acres of Tribal Trust land, 82.4 to 267 acres of wetlands, 37 to 69 prime farmland sites, and up to 1.5 acres of old-growth forest. Habitat for red-shoulder hawk, northern pike, bald eagles, and up to two state-listed protected plant species could be affected. Social impacts could include impacts to Native American community resources, burial sites, community accessibility, and the Onamia School complex. The faciity would encroach upon Kathio State Park and could affect Rum River State Forest, Pike Point boat landing/rest area, and the Garrison Concourse. Traffic-generated noise levels would exceed federal standards in the vicinity of 242 to 320 residential receptor sites during daytime hours and 401 to 469 residential receptor sites during nighttime hours. The increase in impervious surface would result in increased runoff that could affect sensitive lake ecologies in the corridor's drainage area. Two alternatives could affect the southern terminus of the Rum River, which is designated as a wild and scenic river. The project could affect five to 16 historic sites, three to 54 archaeological sites, the Kathio Historic District/National Historic Landmark, and the Mille Lacs Area Cultural Landscape. >From three to 11 mapped and an unknown number of unmapped contaminated sites would be encountered during construction. LEGAL MANDATES: Department of Transportation Act of 1966, as amended (49 U.S.C. 1651 et seq.), Federal Water Pollution Control Act of 1972 (33 U.S.C. 1251 et seq.), National Historic Preservation Act of 1966, as amended (16 U.S.C. 470 et seq.), and Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisition Policies Act of 1970 (42 U.S.C. 4601). JF - EPA number: 020046, 258 pages and maps, January 31, 2002 PY - 2002 VL - 1 KW - Roads and Railroads KW - Agency number: FHWA-MN-EIS-02-01-D KW - Archaeological Sites KW - Cemeteries KW - Cultural Resources KW - Endangered Species (Animals) KW - Endangered Species (Plants) KW - Farmlands KW - Fish KW - Forests KW - Highways KW - Historic Sites KW - Indian Reservations KW - Lakes KW - Noise Standards Violations KW - Parks KW - Recreation Facilities KW - Recreation Resources KW - Relocations-Property Acquisitions KW - Safety KW - Section 4(f) Statements KW - Water Quality KW - Wetlands KW - Wild and Scenic Rivers KW - Wildlife Habitat KW - Minnesota KW - Department of Transportation Act of 1966, Parks KW - Federal Water Pollution Control Act of 1972, Section 404 Permits KW - Federal Water Pollution Control Act of 1972, NPDES Permits KW - National Historic Preservation Act of 1966, Archaeological Sites KW - National Historic Preservation Act of 1966, Historic Sites UR - http://libproxy.lib.unc.edu/login?url=http://search.proquest.com/docview/36388068?accountid=14244 L2 - http://vb3lk7eb4t.search.serialssolutions.com/?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&rfr_id=info:sid/Environmental+Impact+Statements%3A+Full+Text&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=report&rft.jtitle=&rft.atitle=&rft.au=&rft.aulast=&rft.aufirst=&rft.date=2002-01-31&rft.volume=&rft.issue=&rft.spage=&rft.isbn=&rft.btitle=FORT+DAVIS+GENERAL+MANAGEMENT+PLAN%2C+FORT+DAVIS%2C+TEXAS.&rft.title=FORT+DAVIS+GENERAL+MANAGEMENT+PLAN%2C+FORT+DAVIS%2C+TEXAS.&rft.issn=&rft_id=info:doi/ LA - English DB - ProQuest Environmental Science Collection N1 - Name - Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration, St. Paul, Minnesota; DOT N1 - Date revised - 2006-05-01 N1 - SuppNotes - Draft. Preparation date: January 31, 2002 N1 - Last updated - 2011-12-16 ER - TY - RPRT T1 - TABLE MOUNTAIN WIND GENERATING FACILITY, NEVADA. AN - 36411766; 9430 AB - PURPOSE: The development of a nominal 150- to 205-megawatt wind-powered electrical generation facility, involving arrays of wind turbine generators and ancillary facilities at a site approximately 20 miles south of Las Vegas, Nevada. Over the past year, the California-Mexico Power Area has experienced rolling blackouts due to a shortage of generated power in the area. These experiences demonstrate that even with the assumption of future generation and transmission expansion projects, statewide and local reliability problems exist in the short-term. The facility site is situated at the south end of the Spring Mountain Range between the communities of Goodsprings, Sandy Valley, Jean, and Primm, Nevada. Table Mountain Wind Company, LLC, a joint venture between Global Renewable Energy Partners, Inc. and Siemens Energy and Automation, Inc., has applied to the Bureau of Land Management for a 20-year right-of-way grant to construct, operate, and maintain the facility on approximately 325 acres of public land located approximately six miles west of the junction of Interstate 15 and the community of Jean. Four alternatives, including a No Action Alternative, are considered in this final EIS. The proposed project would constitute a merchant plant, providing energy via Valley Electric Association's transmission system to service the growing demand in the southern Nevada area. However, once the facility system has entered into Nevada's power transmission system, the electricity generated by the project could also be wheeled to service customers on the electrical grid in other states. The facility would consist of an array of 153 wind turbine generators that would be located along the ridgelines of Table Mountain, Shenandoah Peak, and an area north of Wilson Pass. The generators would be a combination of the 900-kilowatt NEG Micon generators, rated at 800 kilowatts for the site, and 1,500-kilowatt NEG Micon generators. The generators would be supported on 140- to 290-foot conical tubular steel towers, with a foundation diameter of approximately 15 feet spaced at a minimum of 500 feet. Rotor diameters would range between 180 and 280 feet. The facility would operate up 24 hours per day, 365 days per year, with an annual generating capacity of more than 460 million kilowatt-hours at maximum build-out. Ancillary facilities would include 34.5-kilovolt transmission lines, access and service roads, underground electric collection lines and communications cables, meteorological towers, a substation, and a communications control building. POSITIVE IMPACTS: The facility would provide wind-generated electricity to help meet the existing electricity needs in southern Nevada and demonstrate the ability of wind energy to provide a reliable, economical, and environmentally acceptable energy resource in the region. The facility would provide full-time employment for 20 workers over it's 20-year life. Construction activities could result in the discovery of new fossils. The replacement of sources of energy dependent on fossil fuel would reduce the emission of air pollutants in the region. NEGATIVE IMPACTS: The project would result in the disturbance of 654 acres of land during construction, though 429 acres would be reclaimed after completion of construction. Human activities at and in the vicinity of the site would result in increased bighorn sheep mortality, and operation of the generators and the presence of transmission lines could increase avian and bat mortality significantly. LEGAL MANDATES: Federal Land Policy and Management Act of 1976 (43 U.S.C. 1701 et seq.). PRIOR REFERENCES: For the abstract of the draft EIS, see 02-0122D, Volume 26, Number 2. JF - EPA number: 020317, 373 pages and maps, January 24, 2002 PY - 2002 KW - Energy KW - Agency number: FES 01-21 KW - Biologic Assessments KW - Biologic Surveys KW - Birds KW - Cultural Resources Surveys KW - Electric Generators KW - Electric Power KW - Employment KW - Health Hazard Analyses KW - Land Use KW - Soils KW - Transportation Surveys KW - Transmission Lines KW - Vegetation KW - Visual Resources KW - Visual Resources Surveys KW - Wildlife KW - Wildlife Surveys KW - Nevada KW - Federal Land Policy and Management Act of 1976, Compliance UR - http://libproxy.lib.unc.edu/login?url=http://search.proquest.com/docview/36411766?accountid=14244 L2 - http://vb3lk7eb4t.search.serialssolutions.com/?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&rfr_id=info:sid/Environmental+Impact+Statements%3A+Digests&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=report&rft.jtitle=&rft.atitle=&rft.au=&rft.aulast=&rft.aufirst=&rft.date=2002-01-24&rft.volume=&rft.issue=&rft.spage=&rft.isbn=&rft.btitle=TABLE+MOUNTAIN+WIND+GENERATING+FACILITY%2C+NEVADA.&rft.title=TABLE+MOUNTAIN+WIND+GENERATING+FACILITY%2C+NEVADA.&rft.issn=&rft_id=info:doi/ LA - English DB - ProQuest Environmental Science Collection N1 - Name - Department of the Interior, Bureau of Land Management, Las Vegas, Nevada; DOI N1 - Date revised - 2006-05-01 N1 - SuppNotes - Final. Preparation date: January 24, 2002 N1 - Last updated - 2011-12-16 ER - TY - RPRT T1 - TABLE MOUNTAIN WIND GENERATING FACILITY, NEVADA. [Part 1 of 4] T2 - TABLE MOUNTAIN WIND GENERATING FACILITY, NEVADA. AN - 36378008; 9153-020036_0001 AB - PURPOSE: The development of a nominal 150- to 205-megawatt wind-powered electrical generation facility, involving arrays of wind turbine generators and ancillary facilities at a site approximately 20 miles south of Las Vegas, Nevada. Over the past year, the California-Mexico Power Area has experienced rolling blackouts due to a shortage of generated power in the area. These experiences demonstrate that even with the assumption of future generation and transmission expansion projects, statewide and local reliability problems exist in the short-term. The facility site is situated at the south end of the Spring Mountain Range between the communities of Goodsprings, Sandy Valley, Jean, and Primm, Nevada. Table Mountain Wind Company, LLC., a joint venture between Global Renewable Energy Partners, Inc. and Siemens Energy and Automation, Inc., has applied to the Bureau of Land Management for a 20-year right-of-way grant to construct, operate, and maintain the facility on approximately 325 acres of public land located approximately six miles west of the junction of Interstate 15 and the community of Jean. Four alternatives, including a No Action Alternative, are considered in this draft EIS. The proposed project would constitute a merchant plant, providing energy via Valley Electric Association's transmission system to service the growing demand in the southern Nevada area. However, once the facility system has entered into Nevada's power transmission system, the electricity generated by the project could also be wheeled to service customers on the electrical grid in other states. The facility would consist of an array of 153 wind turbine generators that would be located along the ridgelines of Table Mountain, Shenandoah Peak, and an area north of Wilson Pass. The generators would be a combination of the 900-kilowatt NEG Micon generators, rated at 800 kilowatts for the site, and 1,500-kilowatt NEG Micon generators. The generators would be supported on 140- to 290-foot conical tubular steel towers, with a foundation diameter of approximately 15 feet spaced at a minimum of 500 feet. Rotor diameters would range between 180 and 280 feet. The facility would operate up 24 hours per day, 365 days per year, with an annual generating capacity of more than 460 million kilowatt-hours at maximum build-out. Ancillary facilities would include 34.5-kilovolt transmission lines, access and service roads, underground electric collection lines and communications cables, meteorological towers, a substation, and a communications control building. POSITIVE IMPACTS: The facility would provide wind-generated electricity to help meet the existing electricity needs in southern Nevada and demonstrate the ability of wind energy to provide a reliable, economical, and environmentally acceptable energy resource in the region. The facility would provide full-time employment for 20 workers over it's 20-year life. Construction activities could result in the discovery of new fossils. The replacement of sources of energy dependent on fossil fuel would reduce the emission of air pollutants in the region. NEGATIVE IMPACTS: The project would result in the disturbance of 654 acres of land during construction, though 429 acres would be reclaimed after completion of construction. Human activities at and in the vicinity of the site would result in increased bighorn sheep mortality, and operation of the generators and the presence of transmission lines could increase avian and bat mortality significantly. LEGAL MANDATES: Federal Land Policy and Management Act of 1976 (43 U.S.C. 1701 et seq.). JF - EPA number: 020036, Draft EIS--266 pages and maps, Appendices A-E--307 pages, Appendices F-H--171 pages, January 24, 2002 PY - 2002 VL - 1 KW - Energy KW - Agency number: DES02-3 KW - Biologic Assessments KW - Biologic Surveys KW - Birds KW - Electric Generators KW - Electric Power KW - Employment KW - Health Hazard Analyses KW - Land Use KW - Transportation Surveys KW - Transmission Lines KW - Vegetation KW - Visual Resources KW - Visual Resources Surveys KW - Wildlife KW - Nevada KW - Federal Land Policy and Management Act of 1976, Compliance UR - http://libproxy.lib.unc.edu/login?url=http://search.proquest.com/docview/36378008?accountid=14244 L2 - http://vb3lk7eb4t.search.serialssolutions.com/?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&rfr_id=info:sid/Environmental+Impact+Statements%3A+Full+Text&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=report&rft.jtitle=&rft.atitle=&rft.au=&rft.aulast=&rft.aufirst=&rft.date=2002-01-24&rft.volume=&rft.issue=&rft.spage=&rft.isbn=&rft.btitle=TABLE+MOUNTAIN+WIND+GENERATING+FACILITY%2C+NEVADA.&rft.title=TABLE+MOUNTAIN+WIND+GENERATING+FACILITY%2C+NEVADA.&rft.issn=&rft_id=info:doi/ LA - English DB - ProQuest Environmental Science Collection N1 - Name - Department of the Interior, Bureau of Land Management, Las Vegas, Nevada; DOI N1 - Date revised - 2006-05-01 N1 - SuppNotes - Draft. Preparation date: January 24, 2002 N1 - Last updated - 2011-12-16 ER - TY - RPRT T1 - TABLE MOUNTAIN WIND GENERATING FACILITY, NEVADA. [Part 4 of 4] T2 - TABLE MOUNTAIN WIND GENERATING FACILITY, NEVADA. AN - 36374675; 9153-020036_0004 AB - PURPOSE: The development of a nominal 150- to 205-megawatt wind-powered electrical generation facility, involving arrays of wind turbine generators and ancillary facilities at a site approximately 20 miles south of Las Vegas, Nevada. Over the past year, the California-Mexico Power Area has experienced rolling blackouts due to a shortage of generated power in the area. These experiences demonstrate that even with the assumption of future generation and transmission expansion projects, statewide and local reliability problems exist in the short-term. The facility site is situated at the south end of the Spring Mountain Range between the communities of Goodsprings, Sandy Valley, Jean, and Primm, Nevada. Table Mountain Wind Company, LLC., a joint venture between Global Renewable Energy Partners, Inc. and Siemens Energy and Automation, Inc., has applied to the Bureau of Land Management for a 20-year right-of-way grant to construct, operate, and maintain the facility on approximately 325 acres of public land located approximately six miles west of the junction of Interstate 15 and the community of Jean. Four alternatives, including a No Action Alternative, are considered in this draft EIS. The proposed project would constitute a merchant plant, providing energy via Valley Electric Association's transmission system to service the growing demand in the southern Nevada area. However, once the facility system has entered into Nevada's power transmission system, the electricity generated by the project could also be wheeled to service customers on the electrical grid in other states. The facility would consist of an array of 153 wind turbine generators that would be located along the ridgelines of Table Mountain, Shenandoah Peak, and an area north of Wilson Pass. The generators would be a combination of the 900-kilowatt NEG Micon generators, rated at 800 kilowatts for the site, and 1,500-kilowatt NEG Micon generators. The generators would be supported on 140- to 290-foot conical tubular steel towers, with a foundation diameter of approximately 15 feet spaced at a minimum of 500 feet. Rotor diameters would range between 180 and 280 feet. The facility would operate up 24 hours per day, 365 days per year, with an annual generating capacity of more than 460 million kilowatt-hours at maximum build-out. Ancillary facilities would include 34.5-kilovolt transmission lines, access and service roads, underground electric collection lines and communications cables, meteorological towers, a substation, and a communications control building. POSITIVE IMPACTS: The facility would provide wind-generated electricity to help meet the existing electricity needs in southern Nevada and demonstrate the ability of wind energy to provide a reliable, economical, and environmentally acceptable energy resource in the region. The facility would provide full-time employment for 20 workers over it's 20-year life. Construction activities could result in the discovery of new fossils. The replacement of sources of energy dependent on fossil fuel would reduce the emission of air pollutants in the region. NEGATIVE IMPACTS: The project would result in the disturbance of 654 acres of land during construction, though 429 acres would be reclaimed after completion of construction. Human activities at and in the vicinity of the site would result in increased bighorn sheep mortality, and operation of the generators and the presence of transmission lines could increase avian and bat mortality significantly. LEGAL MANDATES: Federal Land Policy and Management Act of 1976 (43 U.S.C. 1701 et seq.). JF - EPA number: 020036, Draft EIS--266 pages and maps, Appendices A-E--307 pages, Appendices F-H--171 pages, January 24, 2002 PY - 2002 VL - 4 KW - Energy KW - Agency number: DES02-3 KW - Biologic Assessments KW - Biologic Surveys KW - Birds KW - Electric Generators KW - Electric Power KW - Employment KW - Health Hazard Analyses KW - Land Use KW - Transportation Surveys KW - Transmission Lines KW - Vegetation KW - Visual Resources KW - Visual Resources Surveys KW - Wildlife KW - Nevada KW - Federal Land Policy and Management Act of 1976, Compliance UR - http://libproxy.lib.unc.edu/login?url=http://search.proquest.com/docview/36374675?accountid=14244 L2 - http://vb3lk7eb4t.search.serialssolutions.com/?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&rfr_id=info:sid/Environmental+Impact+Statements%3A+Full+Text&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=report&rft.jtitle=&rft.atitle=&rft.au=&rft.aulast=&rft.aufirst=&rft.date=2000-12-08&rft.volume=&rft.issue=&rft.spage=&rft.isbn=&rft.btitle=INTERIOR+COLUMBIA+RIVER+ECOSYSTEM+MANAGEMENT+PROJECT%2C+INTERIOR+COLUMBIA+BASIN%3B+IDAHO%2C+MONTANA%2C+OREGON%2C+AND+WASHINGTON.&rft.title=INTERIOR+COLUMBIA+RIVER+ECOSYSTEM+MANAGEMENT+PROJECT%2C+INTERIOR+COLUMBIA+BASIN%3B+IDAHO%2C+MONTANA%2C+OREGON%2C+AND+WASHINGTON.&rft.issn=&rft_id=info:doi/ LA - English DB - ProQuest Environmental Science Collection N1 - Name - Department of the Interior, Bureau of Land Management, Las Vegas, Nevada; DOI N1 - Date revised - 2006-05-01 N1 - SuppNotes - Draft. Preparation date: January 24, 2002 N1 - Last updated - 2011-12-16 ER - TY - RPRT T1 - TABLE MOUNTAIN WIND GENERATING FACILITY, NEVADA. [Part 2 of 4] T2 - TABLE MOUNTAIN WIND GENERATING FACILITY, NEVADA. AN - 36372489; 9153-020036_0002 AB - PURPOSE: The development of a nominal 150- to 205-megawatt wind-powered electrical generation facility, involving arrays of wind turbine generators and ancillary facilities at a site approximately 20 miles south of Las Vegas, Nevada. Over the past year, the California-Mexico Power Area has experienced rolling blackouts due to a shortage of generated power in the area. These experiences demonstrate that even with the assumption of future generation and transmission expansion projects, statewide and local reliability problems exist in the short-term. The facility site is situated at the south end of the Spring Mountain Range between the communities of Goodsprings, Sandy Valley, Jean, and Primm, Nevada. Table Mountain Wind Company, LLC., a joint venture between Global Renewable Energy Partners, Inc. and Siemens Energy and Automation, Inc., has applied to the Bureau of Land Management for a 20-year right-of-way grant to construct, operate, and maintain the facility on approximately 325 acres of public land located approximately six miles west of the junction of Interstate 15 and the community of Jean. Four alternatives, including a No Action Alternative, are considered in this draft EIS. The proposed project would constitute a merchant plant, providing energy via Valley Electric Association's transmission system to service the growing demand in the southern Nevada area. However, once the facility system has entered into Nevada's power transmission system, the electricity generated by the project could also be wheeled to service customers on the electrical grid in other states. The facility would consist of an array of 153 wind turbine generators that would be located along the ridgelines of Table Mountain, Shenandoah Peak, and an area north of Wilson Pass. The generators would be a combination of the 900-kilowatt NEG Micon generators, rated at 800 kilowatts for the site, and 1,500-kilowatt NEG Micon generators. The generators would be supported on 140- to 290-foot conical tubular steel towers, with a foundation diameter of approximately 15 feet spaced at a minimum of 500 feet. Rotor diameters would range between 180 and 280 feet. The facility would operate up 24 hours per day, 365 days per year, with an annual generating capacity of more than 460 million kilowatt-hours at maximum build-out. Ancillary facilities would include 34.5-kilovolt transmission lines, access and service roads, underground electric collection lines and communications cables, meteorological towers, a substation, and a communications control building. POSITIVE IMPACTS: The facility would provide wind-generated electricity to help meet the existing electricity needs in southern Nevada and demonstrate the ability of wind energy to provide a reliable, economical, and environmentally acceptable energy resource in the region. The facility would provide full-time employment for 20 workers over it's 20-year life. Construction activities could result in the discovery of new fossils. The replacement of sources of energy dependent on fossil fuel would reduce the emission of air pollutants in the region. NEGATIVE IMPACTS: The project would result in the disturbance of 654 acres of land during construction, though 429 acres would be reclaimed after completion of construction. Human activities at and in the vicinity of the site would result in increased bighorn sheep mortality, and operation of the generators and the presence of transmission lines could increase avian and bat mortality significantly. LEGAL MANDATES: Federal Land Policy and Management Act of 1976 (43 U.S.C. 1701 et seq.). JF - EPA number: 020036, Draft EIS--266 pages and maps, Appendices A-E--307 pages, Appendices F-H--171 pages, January 24, 2002 PY - 2002 VL - 2 KW - Energy KW - Agency number: DES02-3 KW - Biologic Assessments KW - Biologic Surveys KW - Birds KW - Electric Generators KW - Electric Power KW - Employment KW - Health Hazard Analyses KW - Land Use KW - Transportation Surveys KW - Transmission Lines KW - Vegetation KW - Visual Resources KW - Visual Resources Surveys KW - Wildlife KW - Nevada KW - Federal Land Policy and Management Act of 1976, Compliance UR - http://libproxy.lib.unc.edu/login?url=http://search.proquest.com/docview/36372489?accountid=14244 L2 - http://vb3lk7eb4t.search.serialssolutions.com/?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&rfr_id=info:sid/Environmental+Impact+Statements%3A+Full+Text&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=report&rft.jtitle=&rft.atitle=&rft.au=&rft.aulast=&rft.aufirst=&rft.date=2002-01-24&rft.volume=&rft.issue=&rft.spage=&rft.isbn=&rft.btitle=TABLE+MOUNTAIN+WIND+GENERATING+FACILITY%2C+NEVADA.&rft.title=TABLE+MOUNTAIN+WIND+GENERATING+FACILITY%2C+NEVADA.&rft.issn=&rft_id=info:doi/ LA - English DB - ProQuest Environmental Science Collection N1 - Name - Department of the Interior, Bureau of Land Management, Las Vegas, Nevada; DOI N1 - Date revised - 2006-05-01 N1 - SuppNotes - Draft. Preparation date: January 24, 2002 N1 - Last updated - 2011-12-16 ER - TY - RPRT T1 - COOS COUNTY NATURAL GAS PIPELINE, OREGON. AN - 36436453; 9141 AB - PURPOSE: The construction of a natural gas pipeline approximately 60 miles in length from near Roseburg to Coos Bay, Coos County, Oregon is proposed. The pipeline would traverse three miles of federal land administered by the Bureau of Land Management (BLM); hence, a perpetual or renewable rights-of-way easement is necessary for implementation of the project. Lacking natural gas, cities within Coos County depend on electricity, oil, or propane. In February 1999, ECONorthwest published a study forecasting the economic impacts of supplying natural gas to the county that indicated the dynamic efficiency effect of the proposed action. Three alternatives, including a No Action Alternative, are considered in this draft EIS. The proposed action would involve the construction, operation, and maintenance of a 12-inch-diameter pipeline, operating at a pressure of from 500 to 800 pounds per square inch, within existing rights-of-way designated for road or utility corridors. The pipeline would begin at an existing natural gas pipeline a few miles south of Rosenburg and terminate in the city of Coos Bay where a distribution facility would be constructed. The project would include construction of pipeline laterals to supply natural gas to the communities of Coquille, Myrtle Point and, possibly, Bandon; the routes of these laterals have not yet been finalized. The system would have a capacity of transporting 70 million cubic feet of natural gas per day. The other action alternative would involve laying the pipeline along a different alignment. Under the No Action Alternative, the rights-of-way easement would not be granted; nevertheless, the county would go ahead with construction of the pipeline, avoiding BLM lands. Cost of the proposed action is estimated at $34.0 million. POSITIVE IMPACTS: Due to the dynamic efficiency effects of providing natural gas to the county, customers would save over $6.7 million annually by the 10th year of operation of the system. Pipeline construction and operation would create jobs in the short- and long-term. NEGATIVE IMPACTS: The pipeline would be constructed in an area providing habitat for three federally protected species, namely, the marbled murrelet, the northern spotted owl, and the bald eagle. The pipeline would traverse 188 streams and one wetland and lie adjacent to two miles of floodplain. Soil productivity would be reduced on 56 acres of affected lands. Financing the project would increase property taxes by $19 per county resident. LEGAL MANDATES: Federal Water Pollution Control Act of 1972 (33 U.S.C. 1251 et seq.) and Mineral Leasing Act of 1920, amendments (P.L. 94-377). JF - EPA number: 020024, 267 pages and maps, January 16, 2002 PY - 2002 KW - Energy KW - Agency number: BLM/OR/WA/PL-02/002+1792 KW - Birds KW - Cultural Resources Surveys KW - Easements KW - Employment KW - Endangered Species (Animals) KW - Floodplains KW - Geologic Assessments KW - Natural Gas KW - Pipelines KW - Soils KW - Wetlands KW - Wildlife Surveys KW - Oregon KW - Federal Water Pollution Control Act of 1972, Section 404 Permits KW - Mineral Leasing Act of 1920, Project Authorization UR - http://libproxy.lib.unc.edu/login?url=http://search.proquest.com/docview/36436453?accountid=14244 L2 - http://vb3lk7eb4t.search.serialssolutions.com/?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&rfr_id=info:sid/Environmental+Impact+Statements%3A+Digests&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=report&rft.jtitle=&rft.atitle=&rft.au=&rft.aulast=&rft.aufirst=&rft.date=2002-01-16&rft.volume=&rft.issue=&rft.spage=&rft.isbn=&rft.btitle=COOS+COUNTY+NATURAL+GAS+PIPELINE%2C+OREGON.&rft.title=COOS+COUNTY+NATURAL+GAS+PIPELINE%2C+OREGON.&rft.issn=&rft_id=info:doi/ LA - English DB - ProQuest Environmental Science Collection N1 - Name - Department of the Interior, Bureau of Land Management, North Bend, Oregon; DOI N1 - Date revised - 2006-05-01 N1 - SuppNotes - Draft. Preparation date: January 16, 2002 N1 - Last updated - 2011-12-16 ER - TY - RPRT T1 - COOS COUNTY NATURAL GAS PIPELINE, OREGON. [Part 1 of 3] T2 - COOS COUNTY NATURAL GAS PIPELINE, OREGON. AN - 36386597; 9141-020024_0001 AB - PURPOSE: The construction of a natural gas pipeline approximately 60 miles in length from near Roseburg to Coos Bay, Coos County, Oregon is proposed. The pipeline would traverse three miles of federal land administered by the Bureau of Land Management (BLM); hence, a perpetual or renewable rights-of-way easement is necessary for implementation of the project. Lacking natural gas, cities within Coos County depend on electricity, oil, or propane. In February 1999, ECONorthwest published a study forecasting the economic impacts of supplying natural gas to the county that indicated the dynamic efficiency effect of the proposed action. Three alternatives, including a No Action Alternative, are considered in this draft EIS. The proposed action would involve the construction, operation, and maintenance of a 12-inch-diameter pipeline, operating at a pressure of from 500 to 800 pounds per square inch, within existing rights-of-way designated for road or utility corridors. The pipeline would begin at an existing natural gas pipeline a few miles south of Rosenburg and terminate in the city of Coos Bay where a distribution facility would be constructed. The project would include construction of pipeline laterals to supply natural gas to the communities of Coquille, Myrtle Point and, possibly, Bandon; the routes of these laterals have not yet been finalized. The system would have a capacity of transporting 70 million cubic feet of natural gas per day. The other action alternative would involve laying the pipeline along a different alignment. Under the No Action Alternative, the rights-of-way easement would not be granted; nevertheless, the county would go ahead with construction of the pipeline, avoiding BLM lands. Cost of the proposed action is estimated at $34.0 million. POSITIVE IMPACTS: Due to the dynamic efficiency effects of providing natural gas to the county, customers would save over $6.7 million annually by the 10th year of operation of the system. Pipeline construction and operation would create jobs in the short- and long-term. NEGATIVE IMPACTS: The pipeline would be constructed in an area providing habitat for three federally protected species, namely, the marbled murrelet, the northern spotted owl, and the bald eagle. The pipeline would traverse 188 streams and one wetland and lie adjacent to two miles of floodplain. Soil productivity would be reduced on 56 acres of affected lands. Financing the project would increase property taxes by $19 per county resident. LEGAL MANDATES: Federal Water Pollution Control Act of 1972 (33 U.S.C. 1251 et seq.) and Mineral Leasing Act of 1920, amendments (P.L. 94-377). JF - EPA number: 020024, 267 pages and maps, January 16, 2002 PY - 2002 VL - 1 KW - Energy KW - Agency number: BLM/OR/WA/PL-02/002+1792 KW - Birds KW - Cultural Resources Surveys KW - Easements KW - Employment KW - Endangered Species (Animals) KW - Floodplains KW - Geologic Assessments KW - Natural Gas KW - Pipelines KW - Soils KW - Wetlands KW - Wildlife Surveys KW - Oregon KW - Federal Water Pollution Control Act of 1972, Section 404 Permits KW - Mineral Leasing Act of 1920, Project Authorization UR - http://libproxy.lib.unc.edu/login?url=http://search.proquest.com/docview/36386597?accountid=14244 L2 - http://vb3lk7eb4t.search.serialssolutions.com/?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&rfr_id=info:sid/Environmental+Impact+Statements%3A+Full+Text&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=report&rft.jtitle=&rft.atitle=&rft.au=&rft.aulast=&rft.aufirst=&rft.date=2000-12-08&rft.volume=&rft.issue=&rft.spage=&rft.isbn=&rft.btitle=DISPOSAL+OF+PORTIONS+OF+THE+FORMER+HOMESTEAD+AIR+FORCE+BASE%2C+MIAMI-DADE+COUNTY%2C+FLORIDA+%28FINAL+SUPPLEMENT+TO+THE+FINAL+ENVIRONMENTAL+IMPACT+STATEMENT+OF+FEBRUARY+1994%29.&rft.title=DISPOSAL+OF+PORTIONS+OF+THE+FORMER+HOMESTEAD+AIR+FORCE+BASE%2C+MIAMI-DADE+COUNTY%2C+FLORIDA+%28FINAL+SUPPLEMENT+TO+THE+FINAL+ENVIRONMENTAL+IMPACT+STATEMENT+OF+FEBRUARY+1994%29.&rft.issn=&rft_id=info:doi/ LA - English DB - ProQuest Environmental Science Collection N1 - Name - Department of the Interior, Bureau of Land Management, North Bend, Oregon; DOI N1 - Date revised - 2006-05-01 N1 - SuppNotes - Draft. Preparation date: January 16, 2002 N1 - Last updated - 2011-12-16 ER - TY - RPRT T1 - COOS COUNTY NATURAL GAS PIPELINE, OREGON. [Part 2 of 3] T2 - COOS COUNTY NATURAL GAS PIPELINE, OREGON. AN - 36375066; 9141-020024_0002 AB - PURPOSE: The construction of a natural gas pipeline approximately 60 miles in length from near Roseburg to Coos Bay, Coos County, Oregon is proposed. The pipeline would traverse three miles of federal land administered by the Bureau of Land Management (BLM); hence, a perpetual or renewable rights-of-way easement is necessary for implementation of the project. Lacking natural gas, cities within Coos County depend on electricity, oil, or propane. In February 1999, ECONorthwest published a study forecasting the economic impacts of supplying natural gas to the county that indicated the dynamic efficiency effect of the proposed action. Three alternatives, including a No Action Alternative, are considered in this draft EIS. The proposed action would involve the construction, operation, and maintenance of a 12-inch-diameter pipeline, operating at a pressure of from 500 to 800 pounds per square inch, within existing rights-of-way designated for road or utility corridors. The pipeline would begin at an existing natural gas pipeline a few miles south of Rosenburg and terminate in the city of Coos Bay where a distribution facility would be constructed. The project would include construction of pipeline laterals to supply natural gas to the communities of Coquille, Myrtle Point and, possibly, Bandon; the routes of these laterals have not yet been finalized. The system would have a capacity of transporting 70 million cubic feet of natural gas per day. The other action alternative would involve laying the pipeline along a different alignment. Under the No Action Alternative, the rights-of-way easement would not be granted; nevertheless, the county would go ahead with construction of the pipeline, avoiding BLM lands. Cost of the proposed action is estimated at $34.0 million. POSITIVE IMPACTS: Due to the dynamic efficiency effects of providing natural gas to the county, customers would save over $6.7 million annually by the 10th year of operation of the system. Pipeline construction and operation would create jobs in the short- and long-term. NEGATIVE IMPACTS: The pipeline would be constructed in an area providing habitat for three federally protected species, namely, the marbled murrelet, the northern spotted owl, and the bald eagle. The pipeline would traverse 188 streams and one wetland and lie adjacent to two miles of floodplain. Soil productivity would be reduced on 56 acres of affected lands. Financing the project would increase property taxes by $19 per county resident. LEGAL MANDATES: Federal Water Pollution Control Act of 1972 (33 U.S.C. 1251 et seq.) and Mineral Leasing Act of 1920, amendments (P.L. 94-377). JF - EPA number: 020024, 267 pages and maps, January 16, 2002 PY - 2002 VL - 2 KW - Energy KW - Agency number: BLM/OR/WA/PL-02/002+1792 KW - Birds KW - Cultural Resources Surveys KW - Easements KW - Employment KW - Endangered Species (Animals) KW - Floodplains KW - Geologic Assessments KW - Natural Gas KW - Pipelines KW - Soils KW - Wetlands KW - Wildlife Surveys KW - Oregon KW - Federal Water Pollution Control Act of 1972, Section 404 Permits KW - Mineral Leasing Act of 1920, Project Authorization UR - http://libproxy.lib.unc.edu/login?url=http://search.proquest.com/docview/36375066?accountid=14244 L2 - http://vb3lk7eb4t.search.serialssolutions.com/?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&rfr_id=info:sid/Environmental+Impact+Statements%3A+Full+Text&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=report&rft.jtitle=&rft.atitle=&rft.au=&rft.aulast=&rft.aufirst=&rft.date=2002-01-16&rft.volume=&rft.issue=&rft.spage=&rft.isbn=&rft.btitle=COOS+COUNTY+NATURAL+GAS+PIPELINE%2C+OREGON.&rft.title=COOS+COUNTY+NATURAL+GAS+PIPELINE%2C+OREGON.&rft.issn=&rft_id=info:doi/ LA - English DB - ProQuest Environmental Science Collection N1 - Name - Department of the Interior, Bureau of Land Management, North Bend, Oregon; DOI N1 - Date revised - 2006-05-01 N1 - SuppNotes - Draft. Preparation date: January 16, 2002 N1 - Last updated - 2011-12-16 ER - TY - RPRT T1 - COOS COUNTY NATURAL GAS PIPELINE, OREGON. [Part 3 of 3] T2 - COOS COUNTY NATURAL GAS PIPELINE, OREGON. AN - 36368287; 9141-020024_0003 AB - PURPOSE: The construction of a natural gas pipeline approximately 60 miles in length from near Roseburg to Coos Bay, Coos County, Oregon is proposed. The pipeline would traverse three miles of federal land administered by the Bureau of Land Management (BLM); hence, a perpetual or renewable rights-of-way easement is necessary for implementation of the project. Lacking natural gas, cities within Coos County depend on electricity, oil, or propane. In February 1999, ECONorthwest published a study forecasting the economic impacts of supplying natural gas to the county that indicated the dynamic efficiency effect of the proposed action. Three alternatives, including a No Action Alternative, are considered in this draft EIS. The proposed action would involve the construction, operation, and maintenance of a 12-inch-diameter pipeline, operating at a pressure of from 500 to 800 pounds per square inch, within existing rights-of-way designated for road or utility corridors. The pipeline would begin at an existing natural gas pipeline a few miles south of Rosenburg and terminate in the city of Coos Bay where a distribution facility would be constructed. The project would include construction of pipeline laterals to supply natural gas to the communities of Coquille, Myrtle Point and, possibly, Bandon; the routes of these laterals have not yet been finalized. The system would have a capacity of transporting 70 million cubic feet of natural gas per day. The other action alternative would involve laying the pipeline along a different alignment. Under the No Action Alternative, the rights-of-way easement would not be granted; nevertheless, the county would go ahead with construction of the pipeline, avoiding BLM lands. Cost of the proposed action is estimated at $34.0 million. POSITIVE IMPACTS: Due to the dynamic efficiency effects of providing natural gas to the county, customers would save over $6.7 million annually by the 10th year of operation of the system. Pipeline construction and operation would create jobs in the short- and long-term. NEGATIVE IMPACTS: The pipeline would be constructed in an area providing habitat for three federally protected species, namely, the marbled murrelet, the northern spotted owl, and the bald eagle. The pipeline would traverse 188 streams and one wetland and lie adjacent to two miles of floodplain. Soil productivity would be reduced on 56 acres of affected lands. Financing the project would increase property taxes by $19 per county resident. LEGAL MANDATES: Federal Water Pollution Control Act of 1972 (33 U.S.C. 1251 et seq.) and Mineral Leasing Act of 1920, amendments (P.L. 94-377). JF - EPA number: 020024, 267 pages and maps, January 16, 2002 PY - 2002 VL - 3 KW - Energy KW - Agency number: BLM/OR/WA/PL-02/002+1792 KW - Birds KW - Cultural Resources Surveys KW - Easements KW - Employment KW - Endangered Species (Animals) KW - Floodplains KW - Geologic Assessments KW - Natural Gas KW - Pipelines KW - Soils KW - Wetlands KW - Wildlife Surveys KW - Oregon KW - Federal Water Pollution Control Act of 1972, Section 404 Permits KW - Mineral Leasing Act of 1920, Project Authorization UR - http://libproxy.lib.unc.edu/login?url=http://search.proquest.com/docview/36368287?accountid=14244 L2 - http://vb3lk7eb4t.search.serialssolutions.com/?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&rfr_id=info:sid/Environmental+Impact+Statements%3A+Full+Text&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=report&rft.jtitle=&rft.atitle=&rft.au=&rft.aulast=&rft.aufirst=&rft.date=2002-01-16&rft.volume=&rft.issue=&rft.spage=&rft.isbn=&rft.btitle=COOS+COUNTY+NATURAL+GAS+PIPELINE%2C+OREGON.&rft.title=COOS+COUNTY+NATURAL+GAS+PIPELINE%2C+OREGON.&rft.issn=&rft_id=info:doi/ LA - English DB - ProQuest Environmental Science Collection N1 - Name - Department of the Interior, Bureau of Land Management, North Bend, Oregon; DOI N1 - Date revised - 2006-05-01 N1 - SuppNotes - Draft. Preparation date: January 16, 2002 N1 - Last updated - 2011-12-16 ER - TY - RPRT T1 - ZORTMAN AND LANDUSKY MINES RECLAMATION PLAN MODIFICATIONS AND MINE LIFE EXTENSIONS, PHILLIPS COUNTY, MONTANA (FINAL SUPPLEMENT TO THE FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT OF MARCH 1996). AN - 36418898; 9131 AB - PURPOSE: The continuation and expansion of Zortman Mining, Inc., (ZMI) mining operations at both the Zortman and Landusky mines, located in Phillips County, Montana, is proposed. On May 11, 1992, ZMI submitted an application to the Lewiston District of the Bureau of Land Management (BLM) and the Montana Department of Environmental Quality to expand mining operations at the mines in Montana's Little Rocky Mountains. Seven alternatives, including the company's proposal and a No Action Alternative, were considered in the final EIS of March 1996. The five other agency alternatives involved various combinations of approval or rejection of mine expansion, acceptance of company reclamation plan, and adoption of one of several agency reclamation strategies. Issues identified through public scoping included Native American religious concerns, acid rock drainage, reclamation, and socioeconomics. The proposed plan included the expansion of existing mine pits to access sulfide ore; a 150-acre, 60-million-ton waste rock disposal area; crushing facilities; a two-and-one-half-mile conveyor system; a 200-acre, 80-million-ton leach pad; a new processing plant and ponds; a limestone quarry; and other associated facilities. Total disturbance was to increase from the existing 401 acres to about 1,292 acres. The operation was located on private and BLM-managed land. The preferred alternative (Alternative 7) was similar to the company's proposal for both mine expansion and modification of reclamation plans, but with agency mitigation added in order to reduce or avoid adverse impacts. Zortman Mining, Inc. declared bankruptcy, requiring that the Bureau of Land Management and the Montana Department of Environmental Quality oversee reclamation at the mine sites. This final supplemental EIS presents 12 reclamation plans, including six for reclamation of the Zortman mine and six for reclamation of the Landusky mine. Preferred alternatives are identified. POSITIVE IMPACTS: The proposed action would correct inadequacies in the existing reclamation plans: it has become apparent that the current approved reclamation plans are not adequate to limit or prevent the development of acid rock drainage from the present mine facilities. NEGATIVE IMPACTS: Existing and possible additional adverse water quality and aquatic habitat impacts would result from acid rock drainage, as well as from potential leakage of heap leach process solution from storage ponds and other contaminant drainage events. Socioeconomic effects of mine closure and reclamation would be substantial. LEGAL MANDATES: Federal Land Policy and Management Act of 1976 (43 U.S.C. 1701 et seq.) and Surface Mining Control and Reclamation Act of 1977 (30 U.S.C. 1201 et seq.). PRIOR REFERENCES: For the abstracts of the draft and final EISs, see 95-0325D, Volume 19, Number 4 and 96-0124F, Volume 20, Number 2. For the abstract of the draft supplemental EIS, see 01-0262D, Volume 25, Number 3. JF - EPA number: 020014, 968 pages and maps, January 9, 2002 PY - 2002 KW - Land Use KW - Acids KW - Air Quality KW - Buildings KW - Crushing and Grinding KW - Cultural Resources KW - Drainage KW - Fisheries KW - Hazardous Wastes KW - Mining KW - Quarries KW - Reclamation Mining KW - Reservoirs KW - Socioeconomic Assessments KW - Storage KW - Tailings KW - Waste Disposal KW - Water Quality KW - Wildlife Habitat KW - Montana KW - Federal Land Policy and Management Act of 1976, Project Authorization KW - Surface Mining Control and Reclamation act of 1977, Program Authorization UR - http://libproxy.lib.unc.edu/login?url=http://search.proquest.com/docview/36418898?accountid=14244 L2 - http://vb3lk7eb4t.search.serialssolutions.com/?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&rfr_id=info:sid/Environmental+Impact+Statements%3A+Digests&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=report&rft.jtitle=&rft.atitle=&rft.au=&rft.aulast=&rft.aufirst=&rft.date=2000-12-07&rft.volume=&rft.issue=&rft.spage=&rft.isbn=&rft.btitle=COLVILLE+INDIAN+RESERVATION+INTEGRATED+RESOURCE+MANAGEMENT+PLAN%2C+FERRY+AND+OKANOGAN+COUNTIES%2C+WASHINGTON.&rft.title=COLVILLE+INDIAN+RESERVATION+INTEGRATED+RESOURCE+MANAGEMENT+PLAN%2C+FERRY+AND+OKANOGAN+COUNTIES%2C+WASHINGTON.&rft.issn=&rft_id=info:doi/ LA - English DB - ProQuest Environmental Science Collection N1 - Name - Department of the Interior, Bureau of Land Management, Malta, Montana; DOI N1 - Date revised - 2006-05-01 N1 - SuppNotes - Final. Preparation date: January 9, 2002 N1 - Last updated - 2011-12-16 ER - TY - RPRT T1 - PLANNING AMENDMENT FOR THE POWDER RIVER BASIN OIL AND GAS PROJECT, CAMPBELL, CONVERSE, JOHNSON, AND SHERIDAN COUNTIES, WYOMING. AN - 36411046; 9134 AB - PURPOSE: The development of additional coal bed methane (CBM) resources in Campbell, Converse, Johnson, and Sheridan counties, Wyoming is proposed by a group of oil and gas companies known collectively as the Powder River Basin Companies. The companies would develop resources in the Powder River Basin. In general, the companies would drill, complete, operate, and reclaim almost 39,400 new natural gas wells and construct, operate, and reclaim various ancillary facilities needed to support the new wells, including roads, pipelines for gathering gas and produced water, and electrical utilities and compressors. Gas extraction would occur within a project area encompassing nearly 8.0 million acres and 18 fourth-order watersheds. The project would affect both public and private lands. The companies hold valid federal, state, and private leases for oil and natural gas extraction in the project area. Three alternatives, including a No Action Alternative (Alternative 3), are considered in this draft EIS. Alternative 1 would effect the lease developments as outlined above. Alternative 2 would provide for the same number of CBM and conventional wells as the proposed action, but would include options for two additional water-handling methods, specifically, one emphasizing infiltration and the other emphasizing treatment for beneficial uses. Alternative 2 would also involve consideration of two air quality options, specifically the use of electrical power to drive 50 percent of the booster compression or use of electrical power to drive 100 percent of the booster compression. Either action alternative would require the construction of 6,657 miles of road improvements and 10,619 miles of two-track road development, 14,127 mils of two- to three-inch-diameter polyproplyene pipeline, 5,311 miles of 12-inch-diameter polyproplyene pipeline, 1,036 miles of 12-inch-diameter steel pipeline, and 5,311 miles of overhead electric transmission line. Compressor units and water-handling facilities would also be required. Alternative 1 is the preferred alternative. Estimated cost of implementing the preferred alternative is $8.28 billion. POSITIVE IMPACTS: Extraction of an estimated 16 trillion cubic feet of CBM and 220 million barrels of oil equivalent would help meet the nation's future energy needs. New CBM activities would provide 2.4 million workdays for construction, 1.8 million workdays for operation and maintenance, and 1.4 million workdays for reclamation and abandonment activities. New non-CBM activities would provide 96,800 workdays for construction, 73,600 workdays for operation and maintenance, and 19,200 workdays for reclamation and abandonment activities. Increases in the amount of available surface water would provide increased water for reservoirs, irrigation, and other beneficial purposes. NEGATIVE IMPACTS: New CBM facilities would disturb 211,992 acres in the short-term and 108,799 acres in the long-term. New non-CBM facilities would disturb 17,599 acres in the short-term and 14,402 acres in the long-term. Groundwater removal would result in drawdown of the Fort Union Formation, Deep Wasatch Sands, and Shallow Wasatch Sands, resulting in declines in well water levels. Increased surface flows would result in erosion. Habitat disturbances could affect big game, raptors, sage and plains short-tailed goose, waterfowl, aquatic species, black-tailed prairie dog, and mountain plover. As many as 430 historic sites could be affected. Rangeland resources would be displaced on 229,591 acres in the short-term and 123,201 acres in the long-term. Facilities would mar visual aesthetics and otherwise degrade the recreational value of the area. LEGAL MANDATES: Federal Land Policy and Management Act of 1976 (43 U.S.C. 1701 et seq.), Federal Onshore Oil and Gas Leasing Reform Act of 1987 (36 CFR 228 1990), and Mineral Leasing Act of 1920, amendments (P.L. 94-377). JF - EPA number: 020017, Volume 1--591 pages and maps, Volume 2--101 pages, January 9, 2002 PY - 2002 KW - Energy KW - Agency number: BLM/WY/PL-02/0031+1310 KW - Biologic Assessments KW - Electric Power KW - Employment KW - Endangered Species (Animals) KW - Historic Sites KW - Impact Monitoring Plans KW - Irrigation KW - Leasing KW - Natural Gas KW - Oil Production KW - Pipelines KW - Pumping Plants KW - Ranges KW - Reclamation KW - Soils Surveys KW - Transmission Lines KW - Vegetation KW - Visual Resources KW - Water Quality KW - Water Quality Assessments KW - Watersheds KW - Wells KW - Wildlife Habitat KW - Powder River Basin KW - Wyoming KW - Federal Land Policy and Management Act of 1976, Compliance KW - Federal Onshore Oil and Gas Leasing Reform Act of 1987, Compliance KW - Mineral Leasing Act of 1920, Project Authorization UR - http://libproxy.lib.unc.edu/login?url=http://search.proquest.com/docview/36411046?accountid=14244 L2 - http://vb3lk7eb4t.search.serialssolutions.com/?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&rfr_id=info:sid/Environmental+Impact+Statements%3A+Digests&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=report&rft.jtitle=&rft.atitle=&rft.au=&rft.aulast=&rft.aufirst=&rft.date=2002-01-09&rft.volume=&rft.issue=&rft.spage=&rft.isbn=&rft.btitle=PLANNING+AMENDMENT+FOR+THE+POWDER+RIVER+BASIN+OIL+AND+GAS+PROJECT%2C+CAMPBELL%2C+CONVERSE%2C+JOHNSON%2C+AND+SHERIDAN+COUNTIES%2C+WYOMING.&rft.title=PLANNING+AMENDMENT+FOR+THE+POWDER+RIVER+BASIN+OIL+AND+GAS+PROJECT%2C+CAMPBELL%2C+CONVERSE%2C+JOHNSON%2C+AND+SHERIDAN+COUNTIES%2C+WYOMING.&rft.issn=&rft_id=info:doi/ LA - English DB - ProQuest Environmental Science Collection N1 - Name - Department of the Interior, Bureau of Land Management, Buffalo, Wyoming; DOI N1 - Date revised - 2006-05-01 N1 - SuppNotes - Draft. Preparation date: January 9, 2002 N1 - Last updated - 2011-12-16 ER - TY - RPRT T1 - PLAN AMENDMENT FOR THE POWDER RIVER BASIN OIL AND GAS PROJECT, CAMPBELL, CONVERSE, JOHNSON, AND SHERIDAN COUNTIES, WYOMING. [Part 3 of 4] T2 - PLAN AMENDMENT FOR THE POWDER RIVER BASIN OIL AND GAS PROJECT, CAMPBELL, CONVERSE, JOHNSON, AND SHERIDAN COUNTIES, WYOMING. AN - 36344257; 9895-030017_0003 AB - PURPOSE: The development of additional coal bed methane (CBM) resources in Campbell, Converse, Johnson, and Sheridan counties, Wyoming is proposed by a group of oil and gas companies known collectively as the Powder River Basin Companies. The companies would develop resources in the Powder River Basin. In general, the companies would drill, complete, operate, and reclaim almost 39,400 new natural gas wells and construct, operate, and reclaim various ancillary facilities needed to support the new wells, including roads, pipelines for gathering gas and produced water, and electrical utilities and compressors. Gas extraction would occur within a project area encompassing nearly 8.0 million acres and 18 fourth-order watersheds. The project would affect both public and private lands. The companies hold valid federal, state, and private leases for oil and natural gas extraction in the project area. Three alternatives, including a No Action Alternative (Alternative 3), are considered in this final EIS. Alternative 1 would effect the lease developments as outlined above. Alternative 2 would provide for the same number of CBM and conventional wells as the proposed action, but would include options for two additional water-handling methods, specifically, one emphasizing infiltration and the other emphasizing treatment for beneficial uses. Alternative 2 would also involve consideration of two air quality options, specifically the use of electrical power to drive 50 percent of the booster compression or use of electrical power to drive 100 percent of the booster compression. Either action alternative would require the construction of 6,657 miles of road improvements and 10,619 miles of two-track road development, 14,127 mils of two- to three-inch-diameter polyproplyene pipeline, 5,311 miles of 12-inch-diameter polyproplyene pipeline, 1,036 miles of 12-inch-diameter steel pipeline, and 5,311 miles of overhead electric transmission line. Compressor units and water-handling facilities would also be required. The preferred alternative is a revision of Alternative 2, with respect to the water-handling and air quality options. POSITIVE IMPACTS: Extraction of an estimated 16 trillion cubic feet of CBM and 220 million barrels of oil equivalent would help meet the nation's future energy needs. New CBM activities would provide 2.4 million workdays for construction, 1.8 million workdays for operation and maintenance, and 1.4 million workdays for reclamation and abandonment activities. New non-CBM activities would provide 96,800 workdays for construction, 73,600 workdays for operation and maintenance, and 19,200 workdays for reclamation and abandonment activities. Increases in the amount of available surface water would provide increased water for reservoirs, irrigation, and other beneficial purposes. NEGATIVE IMPACTS: New CBM facilities would disturb 211,992 acres in the short-term and 108,799 acres in the long-term. New non-CBM facilities would disturb 17,599 acres in the short-term and 14,402 acres in the long-term. Groundwater removal would result in drawdown of the Fort Union Formation, Deep Wasatch Sands, and Shallow Wasatch Sands, resulting in declines in well water levels. Increased surface flows would result in erosion. Habitat disturbances could affect big game, raptors, sage and plains short-tailed goose, waterfowl, aquatic species, black-tailed prairie dog, and mountain plover. As many as 430 historic sites could be affected. Rangeland resources would be displaced on 229,591 acres in the short-term and 123,201 acres in the long-term. Facilities would mar visual aesthetics and otherwise degrade the recreational value of the area. LEGAL MANDATES: Federal Land Policy and Management Act of 1976 (43 U.S.C. 1701 et seq.), Federal Onshore Oil and Gas Leasing Reform Act of 1987 (36 CFR 228 1990), and Mineral Leasing Act of 1920, amendments (P.L. 94-377). PRIOR REFERENCES: For the abstract of the draft EIS, see 02-0278D, Volume 26, Number 3. JF - EPA number: 030017, Volume 1--601 pages and maps, Volume 2--641 pages and maps, Volume 3--344 pages, Volume 4--512 pages, January 9, 2002 PY - 2002 VL - 3 KW - Energy KW - Agency number: BLM/WY/PL-03/004+1310 KW - Air Quality Assessments KW - Biologic Assessments KW - Electric Power KW - Employment KW - Endangered Species (Animals) KW - Historic Sites KW - Irrigation KW - Leasing KW - Natural Gas KW - Oil Production KW - Pipelines KW - Pumping Plants KW - Ranges KW - Reclamation KW - Soils Surveys KW - Transmission Lines KW - Vegetation KW - Visual Resources KW - Water Quality KW - Water Quality Assessments KW - Watersheds KW - Wells KW - Wildlife Habitat KW - Powder River Basin KW - Wyoming KW - Federal Land Policy and Management Act of 1976, Compliance KW - Federal Onshore Oil and Gas Leasing Reform Act of 1987, Compliance KW - Mineral Leasing Act of 1920, Project Authorization UR - http://libproxy.lib.unc.edu/login?url=http://search.proquest.com/docview/36344257?accountid=14244 L2 - http://vb3lk7eb4t.search.serialssolutions.com/?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&rfr_id=info:sid/Environmental+Impact+Statements%3A+Full+Text&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=report&rft.jtitle=&rft.atitle=&rft.au=&rft.aulast=&rft.aufirst=&rft.date=2002-01-09&rft.volume=&rft.issue=&rft.spage=&rft.isbn=&rft.btitle=PLAN+AMENDMENT+FOR+THE+POWDER+RIVER+BASIN+OIL+AND+GAS+PROJECT%2C+CAMPBELL%2C+CONVERSE%2C+JOHNSON%2C+AND+SHERIDAN+COUNTIES%2C+WYOMING.&rft.title=PLAN+AMENDMENT+FOR+THE+POWDER+RIVER+BASIN+OIL+AND+GAS+PROJECT%2C+CAMPBELL%2C+CONVERSE%2C+JOHNSON%2C+AND+SHERIDAN+COUNTIES%2C+WYOMING.&rft.issn=&rft_id=info:doi/ LA - English DB - ProQuest Environmental Science Collection N1 - Name - Department of the Interior, Bureau of Land Management, Buffalo, Wyoming; DOI N1 - Date revised - 2006-05-01 N1 - SuppNotes - Final. Preparation date: January 9, 2002 N1 - Last updated - 2011-12-16 ER - TY - RPRT T1 - PLAN AMENDMENT FOR THE POWDER RIVER BASIN OIL AND GAS PROJECT, CAMPBELL, CONVERSE, JOHNSON, AND SHERIDAN COUNTIES, WYOMING. [Part 1 of 4] T2 - PLAN AMENDMENT FOR THE POWDER RIVER BASIN OIL AND GAS PROJECT, CAMPBELL, CONVERSE, JOHNSON, AND SHERIDAN COUNTIES, WYOMING. AN - 36342078; 9895-030017_0001 AB - PURPOSE: The development of additional coal bed methane (CBM) resources in Campbell, Converse, Johnson, and Sheridan counties, Wyoming is proposed by a group of oil and gas companies known collectively as the Powder River Basin Companies. The companies would develop resources in the Powder River Basin. In general, the companies would drill, complete, operate, and reclaim almost 39,400 new natural gas wells and construct, operate, and reclaim various ancillary facilities needed to support the new wells, including roads, pipelines for gathering gas and produced water, and electrical utilities and compressors. Gas extraction would occur within a project area encompassing nearly 8.0 million acres and 18 fourth-order watersheds. The project would affect both public and private lands. The companies hold valid federal, state, and private leases for oil and natural gas extraction in the project area. Three alternatives, including a No Action Alternative (Alternative 3), are considered in this final EIS. Alternative 1 would effect the lease developments as outlined above. Alternative 2 would provide for the same number of CBM and conventional wells as the proposed action, but would include options for two additional water-handling methods, specifically, one emphasizing infiltration and the other emphasizing treatment for beneficial uses. Alternative 2 would also involve consideration of two air quality options, specifically the use of electrical power to drive 50 percent of the booster compression or use of electrical power to drive 100 percent of the booster compression. Either action alternative would require the construction of 6,657 miles of road improvements and 10,619 miles of two-track road development, 14,127 mils of two- to three-inch-diameter polyproplyene pipeline, 5,311 miles of 12-inch-diameter polyproplyene pipeline, 1,036 miles of 12-inch-diameter steel pipeline, and 5,311 miles of overhead electric transmission line. Compressor units and water-handling facilities would also be required. The preferred alternative is a revision of Alternative 2, with respect to the water-handling and air quality options. POSITIVE IMPACTS: Extraction of an estimated 16 trillion cubic feet of CBM and 220 million barrels of oil equivalent would help meet the nation's future energy needs. New CBM activities would provide 2.4 million workdays for construction, 1.8 million workdays for operation and maintenance, and 1.4 million workdays for reclamation and abandonment activities. New non-CBM activities would provide 96,800 workdays for construction, 73,600 workdays for operation and maintenance, and 19,200 workdays for reclamation and abandonment activities. Increases in the amount of available surface water would provide increased water for reservoirs, irrigation, and other beneficial purposes. NEGATIVE IMPACTS: New CBM facilities would disturb 211,992 acres in the short-term and 108,799 acres in the long-term. New non-CBM facilities would disturb 17,599 acres in the short-term and 14,402 acres in the long-term. Groundwater removal would result in drawdown of the Fort Union Formation, Deep Wasatch Sands, and Shallow Wasatch Sands, resulting in declines in well water levels. Increased surface flows would result in erosion. Habitat disturbances could affect big game, raptors, sage and plains short-tailed goose, waterfowl, aquatic species, black-tailed prairie dog, and mountain plover. As many as 430 historic sites could be affected. Rangeland resources would be displaced on 229,591 acres in the short-term and 123,201 acres in the long-term. Facilities would mar visual aesthetics and otherwise degrade the recreational value of the area. LEGAL MANDATES: Federal Land Policy and Management Act of 1976 (43 U.S.C. 1701 et seq.), Federal Onshore Oil and Gas Leasing Reform Act of 1987 (36 CFR 228 1990), and Mineral Leasing Act of 1920, amendments (P.L. 94-377). PRIOR REFERENCES: For the abstract of the draft EIS, see 02-0278D, Volume 26, Number 3. JF - EPA number: 030017, Volume 1--601 pages and maps, Volume 2--641 pages and maps, Volume 3--344 pages, Volume 4--512 pages, January 9, 2002 PY - 2002 VL - 1 KW - Energy KW - Agency number: BLM/WY/PL-03/004+1310 KW - Air Quality Assessments KW - Biologic Assessments KW - Electric Power KW - Employment KW - Endangered Species (Animals) KW - Historic Sites KW - Irrigation KW - Leasing KW - Natural Gas KW - Oil Production KW - Pipelines KW - Pumping Plants KW - Ranges KW - Reclamation KW - Soils Surveys KW - Transmission Lines KW - Vegetation KW - Visual Resources KW - Water Quality KW - Water Quality Assessments KW - Watersheds KW - Wells KW - Wildlife Habitat KW - Powder River Basin KW - Wyoming KW - Federal Land Policy and Management Act of 1976, Compliance KW - Federal Onshore Oil and Gas Leasing Reform Act of 1987, Compliance KW - Mineral Leasing Act of 1920, Project Authorization UR - http://libproxy.lib.unc.edu/login?url=http://search.proquest.com/docview/36342078?accountid=14244 L2 - http://vb3lk7eb4t.search.serialssolutions.com/?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&rfr_id=info:sid/Environmental+Impact+Statements%3A+Full+Text&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=report&rft.jtitle=&rft.atitle=&rft.au=&rft.aulast=&rft.aufirst=&rft.date=2000-12-06&rft.volume=&rft.issue=&rft.spage=&rft.isbn=&rft.btitle=GENERAL+MANAGEMENT+PLAN%2C+SANTA+MONICA+MOUNTAINS+NATIONAL+RECREATION+AREA%2C+LOS+ANGELES+COUNTY%2C+CALIFORNIA.&rft.title=GENERAL+MANAGEMENT+PLAN%2C+SANTA+MONICA+MOUNTAINS+NATIONAL+RECREATION+AREA%2C+LOS+ANGELES+COUNTY%2C+CALIFORNIA.&rft.issn=&rft_id=info:doi/ LA - English DB - ProQuest Environmental Science Collection N1 - Name - Department of the Interior, Bureau of Land Management, Buffalo, Wyoming; DOI N1 - Date revised - 2006-05-01 N1 - SuppNotes - Final. Preparation date: January 9, 2002 N1 - Last updated - 2011-12-16 ER - TY - RPRT T1 - PLAN AMENDMENT FOR THE POWDER RIVER BASIN OIL AND GAS PROJECT, CAMPBELL, CONVERSE, JOHNSON, AND SHERIDAN COUNTIES, WYOMING. [Part 2 of 4] T2 - PLAN AMENDMENT FOR THE POWDER RIVER BASIN OIL AND GAS PROJECT, CAMPBELL, CONVERSE, JOHNSON, AND SHERIDAN COUNTIES, WYOMING. AN - 36341782; 9895-030017_0002 AB - PURPOSE: The development of additional coal bed methane (CBM) resources in Campbell, Converse, Johnson, and Sheridan counties, Wyoming is proposed by a group of oil and gas companies known collectively as the Powder River Basin Companies. The companies would develop resources in the Powder River Basin. In general, the companies would drill, complete, operate, and reclaim almost 39,400 new natural gas wells and construct, operate, and reclaim various ancillary facilities needed to support the new wells, including roads, pipelines for gathering gas and produced water, and electrical utilities and compressors. Gas extraction would occur within a project area encompassing nearly 8.0 million acres and 18 fourth-order watersheds. The project would affect both public and private lands. The companies hold valid federal, state, and private leases for oil and natural gas extraction in the project area. Three alternatives, including a No Action Alternative (Alternative 3), are considered in this final EIS. Alternative 1 would effect the lease developments as outlined above. Alternative 2 would provide for the same number of CBM and conventional wells as the proposed action, but would include options for two additional water-handling methods, specifically, one emphasizing infiltration and the other emphasizing treatment for beneficial uses. Alternative 2 would also involve consideration of two air quality options, specifically the use of electrical power to drive 50 percent of the booster compression or use of electrical power to drive 100 percent of the booster compression. Either action alternative would require the construction of 6,657 miles of road improvements and 10,619 miles of two-track road development, 14,127 mils of two- to three-inch-diameter polyproplyene pipeline, 5,311 miles of 12-inch-diameter polyproplyene pipeline, 1,036 miles of 12-inch-diameter steel pipeline, and 5,311 miles of overhead electric transmission line. Compressor units and water-handling facilities would also be required. The preferred alternative is a revision of Alternative 2, with respect to the water-handling and air quality options. POSITIVE IMPACTS: Extraction of an estimated 16 trillion cubic feet of CBM and 220 million barrels of oil equivalent would help meet the nation's future energy needs. New CBM activities would provide 2.4 million workdays for construction, 1.8 million workdays for operation and maintenance, and 1.4 million workdays for reclamation and abandonment activities. New non-CBM activities would provide 96,800 workdays for construction, 73,600 workdays for operation and maintenance, and 19,200 workdays for reclamation and abandonment activities. Increases in the amount of available surface water would provide increased water for reservoirs, irrigation, and other beneficial purposes. NEGATIVE IMPACTS: New CBM facilities would disturb 211,992 acres in the short-term and 108,799 acres in the long-term. New non-CBM facilities would disturb 17,599 acres in the short-term and 14,402 acres in the long-term. Groundwater removal would result in drawdown of the Fort Union Formation, Deep Wasatch Sands, and Shallow Wasatch Sands, resulting in declines in well water levels. Increased surface flows would result in erosion. Habitat disturbances could affect big game, raptors, sage and plains short-tailed goose, waterfowl, aquatic species, black-tailed prairie dog, and mountain plover. As many as 430 historic sites could be affected. Rangeland resources would be displaced on 229,591 acres in the short-term and 123,201 acres in the long-term. Facilities would mar visual aesthetics and otherwise degrade the recreational value of the area. LEGAL MANDATES: Federal Land Policy and Management Act of 1976 (43 U.S.C. 1701 et seq.), Federal Onshore Oil and Gas Leasing Reform Act of 1987 (36 CFR 228 1990), and Mineral Leasing Act of 1920, amendments (P.L. 94-377). PRIOR REFERENCES: For the abstract of the draft EIS, see 02-0278D, Volume 26, Number 3. JF - EPA number: 030017, Volume 1--601 pages and maps, Volume 2--641 pages and maps, Volume 3--344 pages, Volume 4--512 pages, January 9, 2002 PY - 2002 VL - 2 KW - Energy KW - Agency number: BLM/WY/PL-03/004+1310 KW - Air Quality Assessments KW - Biologic Assessments KW - Electric Power KW - Employment KW - Endangered Species (Animals) KW - Historic Sites KW - Irrigation KW - Leasing KW - Natural Gas KW - Oil Production KW - Pipelines KW - Pumping Plants KW - Ranges KW - Reclamation KW - Soils Surveys KW - Transmission Lines KW - Vegetation KW - Visual Resources KW - Water Quality KW - Water Quality Assessments KW - Watersheds KW - Wells KW - Wildlife Habitat KW - Powder River Basin KW - Wyoming KW - Federal Land Policy and Management Act of 1976, Compliance KW - Federal Onshore Oil and Gas Leasing Reform Act of 1987, Compliance KW - Mineral Leasing Act of 1920, Project Authorization UR - http://libproxy.lib.unc.edu/login?url=http://search.proquest.com/docview/36341782?accountid=14244 L2 - http://vb3lk7eb4t.search.serialssolutions.com/?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&rfr_id=info:sid/Environmental+Impact+Statements%3A+Full+Text&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=report&rft.jtitle=&rft.atitle=&rft.au=&rft.aulast=&rft.aufirst=&rft.date=2002-01-09&rft.volume=&rft.issue=&rft.spage=&rft.isbn=&rft.btitle=PLAN+AMENDMENT+FOR+THE+POWDER+RIVER+BASIN+OIL+AND+GAS+PROJECT%2C+CAMPBELL%2C+CONVERSE%2C+JOHNSON%2C+AND+SHERIDAN+COUNTIES%2C+WYOMING.&rft.title=PLAN+AMENDMENT+FOR+THE+POWDER+RIVER+BASIN+OIL+AND+GAS+PROJECT%2C+CAMPBELL%2C+CONVERSE%2C+JOHNSON%2C+AND+SHERIDAN+COUNTIES%2C+WYOMING.&rft.issn=&rft_id=info:doi/ LA - English DB - ProQuest Environmental Science Collection N1 - Name - Department of the Interior, Bureau of Land Management, Buffalo, Wyoming; DOI N1 - Date revised - 2006-05-01 N1 - SuppNotes - Final. Preparation date: January 9, 2002 N1 - Last updated - 2011-12-16 ER - TY - RPRT T1 - PLAN AMENDMENT FOR THE POWDER RIVER BASIN OIL AND GAS PROJECT, CAMPBELL, CONVERSE, JOHNSON, AND SHERIDAN COUNTIES, WYOMING. [Part 4 of 4] T2 - PLAN AMENDMENT FOR THE POWDER RIVER BASIN OIL AND GAS PROJECT, CAMPBELL, CONVERSE, JOHNSON, AND SHERIDAN COUNTIES, WYOMING. AN - 36338247; 9895-030017_0004 AB - PURPOSE: The development of additional coal bed methane (CBM) resources in Campbell, Converse, Johnson, and Sheridan counties, Wyoming is proposed by a group of oil and gas companies known collectively as the Powder River Basin Companies. The companies would develop resources in the Powder River Basin. In general, the companies would drill, complete, operate, and reclaim almost 39,400 new natural gas wells and construct, operate, and reclaim various ancillary facilities needed to support the new wells, including roads, pipelines for gathering gas and produced water, and electrical utilities and compressors. Gas extraction would occur within a project area encompassing nearly 8.0 million acres and 18 fourth-order watersheds. The project would affect both public and private lands. The companies hold valid federal, state, and private leases for oil and natural gas extraction in the project area. Three alternatives, including a No Action Alternative (Alternative 3), are considered in this final EIS. Alternative 1 would effect the lease developments as outlined above. Alternative 2 would provide for the same number of CBM and conventional wells as the proposed action, but would include options for two additional water-handling methods, specifically, one emphasizing infiltration and the other emphasizing treatment for beneficial uses. Alternative 2 would also involve consideration of two air quality options, specifically the use of electrical power to drive 50 percent of the booster compression or use of electrical power to drive 100 percent of the booster compression. Either action alternative would require the construction of 6,657 miles of road improvements and 10,619 miles of two-track road development, 14,127 mils of two- to three-inch-diameter polyproplyene pipeline, 5,311 miles of 12-inch-diameter polyproplyene pipeline, 1,036 miles of 12-inch-diameter steel pipeline, and 5,311 miles of overhead electric transmission line. Compressor units and water-handling facilities would also be required. The preferred alternative is a revision of Alternative 2, with respect to the water-handling and air quality options. POSITIVE IMPACTS: Extraction of an estimated 16 trillion cubic feet of CBM and 220 million barrels of oil equivalent would help meet the nation's future energy needs. New CBM activities would provide 2.4 million workdays for construction, 1.8 million workdays for operation and maintenance, and 1.4 million workdays for reclamation and abandonment activities. New non-CBM activities would provide 96,800 workdays for construction, 73,600 workdays for operation and maintenance, and 19,200 workdays for reclamation and abandonment activities. Increases in the amount of available surface water would provide increased water for reservoirs, irrigation, and other beneficial purposes. NEGATIVE IMPACTS: New CBM facilities would disturb 211,992 acres in the short-term and 108,799 acres in the long-term. New non-CBM facilities would disturb 17,599 acres in the short-term and 14,402 acres in the long-term. Groundwater removal would result in drawdown of the Fort Union Formation, Deep Wasatch Sands, and Shallow Wasatch Sands, resulting in declines in well water levels. Increased surface flows would result in erosion. Habitat disturbances could affect big game, raptors, sage and plains short-tailed goose, waterfowl, aquatic species, black-tailed prairie dog, and mountain plover. As many as 430 historic sites could be affected. Rangeland resources would be displaced on 229,591 acres in the short-term and 123,201 acres in the long-term. Facilities would mar visual aesthetics and otherwise degrade the recreational value of the area. LEGAL MANDATES: Federal Land Policy and Management Act of 1976 (43 U.S.C. 1701 et seq.), Federal Onshore Oil and Gas Leasing Reform Act of 1987 (36 CFR 228 1990), and Mineral Leasing Act of 1920, amendments (P.L. 94-377). PRIOR REFERENCES: For the abstract of the draft EIS, see 02-0278D, Volume 26, Number 3. JF - EPA number: 030017, Volume 1--601 pages and maps, Volume 2--641 pages and maps, Volume 3--344 pages, Volume 4--512 pages, January 9, 2002 PY - 2002 VL - 4 KW - Energy KW - Agency number: BLM/WY/PL-03/004+1310 KW - Air Quality Assessments KW - Biologic Assessments KW - Electric Power KW - Employment KW - Endangered Species (Animals) KW - Historic Sites KW - Irrigation KW - Leasing KW - Natural Gas KW - Oil Production KW - Pipelines KW - Pumping Plants KW - Ranges KW - Reclamation KW - Soils Surveys KW - Transmission Lines KW - Vegetation KW - Visual Resources KW - Water Quality KW - Water Quality Assessments KW - Watersheds KW - Wells KW - Wildlife Habitat KW - Powder River Basin KW - Wyoming KW - Federal Land Policy and Management Act of 1976, Compliance KW - Federal Onshore Oil and Gas Leasing Reform Act of 1987, Compliance KW - Mineral Leasing Act of 1920, Project Authorization UR - http://libproxy.lib.unc.edu/login?url=http://search.proquest.com/docview/36338247?accountid=14244 L2 - http://vb3lk7eb4t.search.serialssolutions.com/?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&rfr_id=info:sid/Environmental+Impact+Statements%3A+Full+Text&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=report&rft.jtitle=&rft.atitle=&rft.au=&rft.aulast=&rft.aufirst=&rft.date=2002-01-09&rft.volume=&rft.issue=&rft.spage=&rft.isbn=&rft.btitle=PLAN+AMENDMENT+FOR+THE+POWDER+RIVER+BASIN+OIL+AND+GAS+PROJECT%2C+CAMPBELL%2C+CONVERSE%2C+JOHNSON%2C+AND+SHERIDAN+COUNTIES%2C+WYOMING.&rft.title=PLAN+AMENDMENT+FOR+THE+POWDER+RIVER+BASIN+OIL+AND+GAS+PROJECT%2C+CAMPBELL%2C+CONVERSE%2C+JOHNSON%2C+AND+SHERIDAN+COUNTIES%2C+WYOMING.&rft.issn=&rft_id=info:doi/ LA - English DB - ProQuest Environmental Science Collection N1 - Name - Department of the Interior, Bureau of Land Management, Buffalo, Wyoming; DOI N1 - Date revised - 2006-05-01 N1 - SuppNotes - Final. Preparation date: January 9, 2002 N1 - Last updated - 2011-12-16 ER - TY - RPRT T1 - PLAN AMENDMENT FOR THE POWDER RIVER BASIN OIL AND GAS PROJECT, CAMPBELL, CONVERSE, JOHNSON, AND SHERIDAN COUNTIES, WYOMING. AN - 16360854; 9895 AB - PURPOSE: The development of additional coal bed methane (CBM) resources in Campbell, Converse, Johnson, and Sheridan counties, Wyoming is proposed by a group of oil and gas companies known collectively as the Powder River Basin Companies. The companies would develop resources in the Powder River Basin. In general, the companies would drill, complete, operate, and reclaim almost 39,400 new natural gas wells and construct, operate, and reclaim various ancillary facilities needed to support the new wells, including roads, pipelines for gathering gas and produced water, and electrical utilities and compressors. Gas extraction would occur within a project area encompassing nearly 8.0 million acres and 18 fourth-order watersheds. The project would affect both public and private lands. The companies hold valid federal, state, and private leases for oil and natural gas extraction in the project area. Three alternatives, including a No Action Alternative (Alternative 3), are considered in this final EIS. Alternative 1 would effect the lease developments as outlined above. Alternative 2 would provide for the same number of CBM and conventional wells as the proposed action, but would include options for two additional water-handling methods, specifically, one emphasizing infiltration and the other emphasizing treatment for beneficial uses. Alternative 2 would also involve consideration of two air quality options, specifically the use of electrical power to drive 50 percent of the booster compression or use of electrical power to drive 100 percent of the booster compression. Either action alternative would require the construction of 6,657 miles of road improvements and 10,619 miles of two-track road development, 14,127 mils of two- to three-inch-diameter polyproplyene pipeline, 5,311 miles of 12-inch-diameter polyproplyene pipeline, 1,036 miles of 12-inch-diameter steel pipeline, and 5,311 miles of overhead electric transmission line. Compressor units and water-handling facilities would also be required. The preferred alternative is a revision of Alternative 2, with respect to the water-handling and air quality options. POSITIVE IMPACTS: Extraction of an estimated 16 trillion cubic feet of CBM and 220 million barrels of oil equivalent would help meet the nation's future energy needs. New CBM activities would provide 2.4 million workdays for construction, 1.8 million workdays for operation and maintenance, and 1.4 million workdays for reclamation and abandonment activities. New non-CBM activities would provide 96,800 workdays for construction, 73,600 workdays for operation and maintenance, and 19,200 workdays for reclamation and abandonment activities. Increases in the amount of available surface water would provide increased water for reservoirs, irrigation, and other beneficial purposes. NEGATIVE IMPACTS: New CBM facilities would disturb 211,992 acres in the short-term and 108,799 acres in the long-term. New non-CBM facilities would disturb 17,599 acres in the short-term and 14,402 acres in the long-term. Groundwater removal would result in drawdown of the Fort Union Formation, Deep Wasatch Sands, and Shallow Wasatch Sands, resulting in declines in well water levels. Increased surface flows would result in erosion. Habitat disturbances could affect big game, raptors, sage and plains short-tailed goose, waterfowl, aquatic species, black-tailed prairie dog, and mountain plover. As many as 430 historic sites could be affected. Rangeland resources would be displaced on 229,591 acres in the short-term and 123,201 acres in the long-term. Facilities would mar visual aesthetics and otherwise degrade the recreational value of the area. LEGAL MANDATES: Federal Land Policy and Management Act of 1976 (43 U.S.C. 1701 et seq.), Federal Onshore Oil and Gas Leasing Reform Act of 1987 (36 CFR 228 1990), and Mineral Leasing Act of 1920, amendments (P.L. 94-377). PRIOR REFERENCES: For the abstract of the draft EIS, see 02-0278D, Volume 26, Number 3. JF - EPA number: 030017, Volume 1--601 pages and maps, Volume 2--641 pages and maps, Volume 3--344 pages, Volume 4--512 pages, January 9, 2002 PY - 2002 KW - Energy KW - Agency number: BLM/WY/PL-03/004+1310 KW - Air Quality Assessments KW - Biologic Assessments KW - Electric Power KW - Employment KW - Endangered Species (Animals) KW - Historic Sites KW - Irrigation KW - Leasing KW - Natural Gas KW - Oil Production KW - Pipelines KW - Pumping Plants KW - Ranges KW - Reclamation KW - Soils Surveys KW - Transmission Lines KW - Vegetation KW - Visual Resources KW - Water Quality KW - Water Quality Assessments KW - Watersheds KW - Wells KW - Wildlife Habitat KW - Powder River Basin KW - Wyoming KW - Federal Land Policy and Management Act of 1976, Compliance KW - Federal Onshore Oil and Gas Leasing Reform Act of 1987, Compliance KW - Mineral Leasing Act of 1920, Project Authorization UR - http://libproxy.lib.unc.edu/login?url=http://search.proquest.com/docview/16360854?accountid=14244 L2 - http://vb3lk7eb4t.search.serialssolutions.com/?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&rfr_id=info:sid/Environmental+Impact+Statements%3A+Digests&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=report&rft.jtitle=&rft.atitle=&rft.au=&rft.aulast=&rft.aufirst=&rft.date=2000-12-01&rft.volume=&rft.issue=&rft.spage=&rft.isbn=&rft.btitle=&rft.title=USGS+Fact+Sheet+135-00&rft.issn=&rft_id=info:doi/ LA - English DB - ProQuest Environmental Science Collection N1 - Name - Department of the Interior, Bureau of Land Management, Buffalo, Wyoming; DOI N1 - Date revised - 2006-05-01 N1 - SuppNotes - Final. Preparation date: January 9, 2002 N1 - Last updated - 2014-01-30 ER - TY - RPRT T1 - FLAT CANYON COAL LEASE TRACT (UTU-77114), FERRON-PRICE RANGER DISTRICT, MANTI-LA SAL NATIONAL FOREST, SANPETE AND EMERY COUNTIES UTAH. AN - 16349431; 9132 AB - PURPOSE: The leasing of federal coal estate within the Flat Canyon Federal Coal Lease Tract (UTU-77114) in the Ferron-Price Ranger District, Manti-La Sai National Forest, Sanpete and Emery counties, Utah is proposed. The tract encompasses 2,692.16 acres of federal coal reserves within the Wasatch Plateau Coal Field. The lease application, submitted by Canyon Fuel Company, LLC would potentially add adjacent recoverable coal reserves to the permit area for the Skyline Mine and extend the mine life an estimated nine to 12 years. If leased to Canyon Fuel, the company would extend their underground coal workings to the west into the tract and beyond into private coal reserves. Two coal seams could be mined over the majority of the project area. Recoverable reserves within the tract and the adjacent area are estimated at approximately 36 million tons. An annual production rate of 3.0 to 4.0 million tons would be expected. The proposed action is to offer the tract for competitive leasing, with special coal lease stipulations to protect natural resources. The reasonably foreseeable development scenario products underground coal mining within the tract and adjacent private holdings, including some minor surface developments consisting of two ventilation shafts and 10 coal exploration drill holes. Key issues identified during scoping include those related to structures and facilities, surface and groundwater quality, subsidence, vegetation and wildlife habitat, recreational resources, visual quality, and socioeconomics. Four alternatives, including a No Action Alternative (Alternative A), are considered in this final EIS. Depending on the action alternative considered, the coal would be leased under standard lease terms or under such terms with special stipulations to protect non-mineral natural resources. One alternative (Alternative C) would prohibit actions that would result in subsidence of perennial drainages, Boulger Dam and Reservoir, State Route 264, and the Flat Canyon Campground. Alternative C would allow for recovery of only 18 to 20 million tons of coal and extend the mine life by only five to seven years. The preferred alternative is a combination of alternatives B-prime and C. POSITIVE IMPACTS: The coal would be used for generation of electricity, other industrial uses. The lease plan would maximize economic returns to national, state and local economies and prevent the bypassing of mineable coal reserves adjacent to an existing mine that may otherwise not be mined. NEGATIVE IMPACTS: Mine water discharge would increase from 2,600 gallons per minute (gpm) to 4,000 gpm. Vent shafts and exploration holes would disturb 12.1 acres of land and vegetation and the associated wildlife habitat. Longwall subsidence would cause land surface depressions two to 14 feet in some areas and could result in seismic ground shaking. Under two alternatives, the Boulger Dam and Reservoir would be affected by subsidence of up to 13 feet, resulting in the potential for dam failure, resulting in severe downstream flooding. The dam would be out of service for up to 12 years, resulting in damages valued at $390,000. Subsidence at Flat Canyon Cabins and Swens Canyon Cabins could result in $360,000 in damages. Mining induced seismicity could damage Hunt Dam and Reservoir. Total dissolved solids and phosphorous loading within Scofield Reservoir would increase. Flows in Price River could decline as much as five percent. LEGAL MANDATES: Federal Land Policy and Management Act of 1976 (43 U.S.C. 1701 et seq.), Mineral Leasing Act of 1920, amendments (P.L. 94-377), National Forest Management Act of 1976 (16 U.S.C. 1600 et seq.), and Surface Mining Control and Reclamation Act of 1977 (30 PRIOR REFERENCES: For the abstract of the draft EIS, see 01-0264D, Volume 25, Number 3. JF - EPA number: 020015, Record of Decision--67 Final EIS--287 pages and maps, January 9, 2002 PY - 2002 KW - Land Use KW - Dams KW - Coal KW - Forests KW - Impact Monitoring Plans KW - Leasing KW - Mineral Resources KW - Mineral Resources Management KW - Mining KW - Recreation Facilities KW - Reservoirs KW - Subsidence KW - Vegetation KW - Water Quality KW - Water Quality Assessments KW - Wildlife Habitat KW - Manti-La Sal National Forest KW - Utah KW - Federal Land Policy and Management Act of 1976, Compliance KW - Mineral Leasing Act of 1920, Compliance KW - National Forest Management Act of 1976, Compliance KW - Surface Mining Control and Reclamation Act of 1977, Compliance UR - http://libproxy.lib.unc.edu/login?url=http://search.proquest.com/docview/16349431?accountid=14244 L2 - http://vb3lk7eb4t.search.serialssolutions.com/?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&rfr_id=info:sid/Environmental+Impact+Statements%3A+Digests&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=report&rft.jtitle=&rft.atitle=&rft.au=&rft.aulast=&rft.aufirst=&rft.date=2002-01-09&rft.volume=&rft.issue=&rft.spage=&rft.isbn=&rft.btitle=FLAT+CANYON+COAL+LEASE+TRACT+%28UTU-77114%29%2C+FERRON-PRICE+RANGER+DISTRICT%2C+MANTI-LA+SAL+NATIONAL+FOREST%2C+SANPETE+AND+EMERY+COUNTIES+UTAH.&rft.title=FLAT+CANYON+COAL+LEASE+TRACT+%28UTU-77114%29%2C+FERRON-PRICE+RANGER+DISTRICT%2C+MANTI-LA+SAL+NATIONAL+FOREST%2C+SANPETE+AND+EMERY+COUNTIES+UTAH.&rft.issn=&rft_id=info:doi/ LA - English DB - ProQuest Environmental Science Collection N1 - Name - Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Price, Utah; DA N1 - Date revised - 2006-05-01 N1 - SuppNotes - Final. Preparation date: January 9, 2002 N1 - Last updated - 2011-12-16 ER - TY - GEN T1 - Fort McHenry National Monument and Historic Shrine. Teacher's Guide. AN - 62193800; ED467470 AB - This teacher's guide explores Fort McHenry and the British attack on Baltimore Harbor (Maryland) in 1814. The guide contains 11 lessons: (1) "Where in the World Is Baltimore?" (no handout-use classroom resources); (2) "Why Baltimore?" (Handout-Why Baltimore?); (3) "Now Where Do We Place the Fort?" (Handout-Map of Patapsco River/Baltimore Harbor); (4) "The Star Fort" (Handout-Diagram of Fort McHenry; Handout-The Star Fort); (5) "Defenders of Fort McHenry" (Handout-The Defenders); (6) "An African American Soldier Defends Fort McHenry" (Handout-A Black Soldier Defends Fort McHenry); (7) "Fort McHenry Measurements Today" (Handout-Fort McHenry Today: Wall Measurements); (8) "The Great Garrison Flag" (Handout-Great Garrison Flag); (9) "Francis Scott Key" (Handout-Francis Scott Key); (10) "The Star-Spangled Banner" (Handout-"Star-Spangled Banner"); and (11) "History of Fort McHenry" (Handout-History of Fort McHenry). An extensive bibliography contains references about the flag, Francis Scott Key, and the War of 1812. A teacher's guide evaluation sheet also is attached. (BT) AU - Rogers, Jim Y1 - 2002/01/07/ PY - 2002 DA - 2002 Jan 07 SP - 37 PB - United States Department of the Interior, National Park Service, Fort McHenry National Monument & Historic Shrine, Baltimore, MD 21230-5393. For full text: http://www.nps.gov/fomc/tguide/Contents.htm/. KW - Maryland (Baltimore) KW - Site Visits KW - Star Spangled Banner KW - ERIC, Resources in Education (RIE) KW - Teachers KW - Practitioners KW - Heritage Education KW - Built Environment KW - Student Research KW - Social Studies KW - Teaching Guides KW - Student Educational Objectives KW - Primary Sources KW - United States History KW - Historic Sites KW - Middle Schools UR - http://libproxy.lib.unc.edu/login?url=http://search.proquest.com/docview/62193800?accountid=14244 LA - English DB - ERIC N1 - Last updated - 2017-02-24 ER - TY - RPRT T1 - FINGER LAKES NATIONAL FOREST OIL AND GAS LEASING, GREEN MOUNTAIN AND FINGER LAKES NATIONAL FORESTS, NEW YORK. AN - 36411153; 9127 AB - PURPOSE: The designation of lands available for leasing and subsequent exploration for and development of oil and gas resources within the Finger Lakes National Forest (FLNF) of New York is proposed. The analysis area consists of all sub watersheds located between Seneca Lake and Cayuga Lake, some of which are located to the north and south of the forest, all lands known as the FLNF, and split estates. Key issues identified during scoping include those related to air quality, wildlife and wildlife habitat, soil and water resources, noise levels, visual resources, economic conditions, and social conditions. Five alternatives, including a No Action Alternative (Alternative 4), are considered in this final EIS. Under the preferred alternative (Alternative 2), the Forest Service would consent to lease and the Bureau of Land Management (BLM), in turn, would lease 16,036 acres of the forest for exploration of and development purposes. In addition, the BLM would lease 47 acres of split estates. The 16,036 acres are contained in management areas 1.2A, 1.2B, 1.3, 2.1, 3.1, 8.1, and 9.2. Of the 16,036 total acres in the forest, 2,836 would be unavailable for leasing. Surface occupancy could occur on the majority of the areas offered for leasing. In addition, 24 acres of split estates would also be open for surface occupancy. Operating restrictions would include reclamation of disturbed lands with native species, use of pressure switches on wells, gating of access roads, fencing of drill pits and wellhead/tank batteries, implementation of sediment control measures, well testing and monitoring, and implementation of standard operating procedures. POSITIVE IMPACTS: Leasing of the oil and gas resources for development would help provide for the nation's energy needs and reduce dependence on foreign sources of these resources. Exploration and development activities would employ local and regional workers and otherwise contribute to the regional economy. Gross annual receipts of $3.2 to $11.7 would be realized over the 25-year production cycle. Royalty payments to the federal government would amount to $400,000 to $1.4 million per year, and state and local entities would also benefit from taxes and revenue sharing. Lease development would provide for 400 person-years of employment in well construction and operation, resulting in personal income amounting to $14 million. NEGATIVE IMPACTS: In the event of an uncontrolled blowout, flows of formation fluids (brine, natural gas, and oil) would escape from the wellbore, a situation that would affect soil and water quality and could result in explosions and fire. Construction of access roads, well pads, and pipelines and the use of trucks and other heavy equipment in drilling and production activities could affect soils locally, causing erosion, compaction, and contamination at and near well sites. Project facilities, including pipelines, could conflict with shrubland and timber land management goals, as well as recreational uses of the forest due to noise and visual impacts. Seven residential communities could be directly affected by noise, visual, and other impacts. Heritage resources could be affected. Shrub and forested habitat would be disturbed in the short-term and some acreage of such habitat would be eliminated over the long-term. Habitat for federally protected species would be affected. LEGAL MANDATES: Federal Onshore Oil and Gas Leasing Reform Act of 1987 (36 CFR 228E), Mineral Leasing Act for Acquired Lands of 1947 (30 U.S.C. 351-359), and National Forest Management Act of 1976 (16 U.S.C. 1600 et seq.). PRIOR REFERENCES: For the abstract of the draft EIS, see 01-0246D, Volume 25, Number 3. JF - EPA number: 020010, Final EIS--492 pages, Response to Comments--103 pages, January 7, 2002 PY - 2002 KW - Energy KW - Employment KW - Endangered Species (Animals) KW - Erosion KW - Fires KW - Forests KW - Leasing KW - Mineral Resources KW - Mineral Resources Management KW - Natural Gas KW - Noise KW - Oil Production KW - Pipelines KW - Reclamation KW - Roads KW - Timber Management KW - Visual Resources KW - Water Quality KW - Wildlife Habitat KW - Finger Lakes National Forest KW - Green Mountain National Forest KW - New York KW - Federal Onshore Oil and Gas Leasing Reform Act of 1987, Compliance KW - Mineral Leasing Act for Acquired Lands of 1947, Compliance KW - National Forest Management Act of 1976, Compliance UR - http://libproxy.lib.unc.edu/login?url=http://search.proquest.com/docview/36411153?accountid=14244 L2 - http://vb3lk7eb4t.search.serialssolutions.com/?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&rfr_id=info:sid/Environmental+Impact+Statements%3A+Digests&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=report&rft.jtitle=&rft.atitle=&rft.au=&rft.aulast=&rft.aufirst=&rft.date=2002-01-07&rft.volume=&rft.issue=&rft.spage=&rft.isbn=&rft.btitle=FINGER+LAKES+NATIONAL+FOREST+OIL+AND+GAS+LEASING%2C+GREEN+MOUNTAIN+AND+FINGER+LAKES+NATIONAL+FORESTS%2C+NEW+YORK.&rft.title=FINGER+LAKES+NATIONAL+FOREST+OIL+AND+GAS+LEASING%2C+GREEN+MOUNTAIN+AND+FINGER+LAKES+NATIONAL+FORESTS%2C+NEW+YORK.&rft.issn=&rft_id=info:doi/ LA - English DB - ProQuest Environmental Science Collection N1 - Name - Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Hector, New York; DA N1 - Date revised - 2006-05-01 N1 - SuppNotes - Final. Preparation date: January 7, 2002 N1 - Last updated - 2011-12-16 ER - TY - RPRT T1 - PHOENIX PROJECT, LANDER COUNTY, NEVADA. AN - 36421642; 9118 AB - PURPOSE: The expansion of the current gold, silver, and copper mining and beneficiation operations proposed by the Battle Mountain Gold Company in Lander County, Nevada is proposed. The company is a wholly owned subsidiary of the Newmont Mining Company. The project, known as the Phoenix Project lies in Copper Canyon approximately 12 miles southwest of Battle Mountain. The applicant's proposal and a No Action Alternative are considered in this final EIS. The applicant's proposal would involve developing the Phoenix and Reona pits and expanding the existing Midas and Iron Canyon pits. Mining the ore deposits would be coupled with excavating and processing of low-grade gold ore stockpiles associated with previous mining operations. Heap-leach-grade ore would be processed at the existing and proposed expansion of the Reona heap leach facility. Mill-grade ore would be processed at proposed crushing, grinding, and milling facilities, The crushing/milling facilities would supply mined ore to a precious metal recovery plant. Tailings would be deposited at a new lined tailings facility south of Copper Canyon. The heap leach and tailings facilities would be designated as zero-discharge facilities. The plan would also involve closure and reclamation of the previous copper heap leach facilities, lining and isolating the previous copper tailings facility, and backfilling three existing open pits. The project would have an operational life of up to 28 years, followed by five years of reclamation activities. POSITIVE IMPACTS: The project would result in the recovery of approximately 5.2 million ounces of gold, 27 million ounces of silver, and 360 million pounds of copper. In addition to providing valuable minerals important to maintaining national supplies of these resources, the project would employ 300 to 350 workers during the development phase and 250 to 270 workers during the operational phase. NEGATIVE IMPACTS: The expansion activities would result in disturbance of approximately 4,295 acres of public and private lands, and the associated grazing land and wildlife habitat, in the Copper Canyon area. A total of 7,073 acres of vegetation, involving five plant communities, would be disturbed in the short-term. The project would result in the generation of approximately 135 million tons of tailings material, 910 million tons of waste rock, and 50 million tons of spent heap leach material. The geologic terrain of the area would be permanently altered. The project would require pumping of 150- to 1,500-gallons-per-minute from the groundwater table over the first 24 years of development. Near the end of the mining period, pit dewatering would result in a maximum aquifer drawdown of 650 feet in the upper Copper Canyon area and over 50 in the chloride migration well field area. Drawdown could affect the 10 inventoried perennial streams and six surface water rights in the area. Seventeen cultural resource sites eligible and four sites potentially eligible for inclusion in the National Register of Historic Places would be affected. Two sites of potential cultural importance to Native Americans could be affected. The influx of workers and their families would place stress on some community services, including schools. LEGAL MANDATES: Federal Land Policy and Management Act of 1976 (43 U.S.C. 1701 et seq.). PRIOR REFERENCES: For the abstract of the draft EIS, see 01-0133D, Volume 25, Number 2. JF - EPA number: 020001, 561 pages and maps, January 3, 2002 PY - 2002 KW - Land Use KW - Agency number: BLM/BM/PL-01/003+1793 KW - Archaeological Sites KW - Cultural Resources KW - Crushing and Grinding KW - Employment KW - Geologic Assessments KW - Grazing KW - Metals KW - Mining KW - Reclamation KW - Ranges KW - Schools KW - Tailings KW - Vegetation KW - Vegetation Surveys KW - Waste Disposal KW - Water Quality Assessments KW - Wildlife Habitat KW - Nevada KW - Federal Land Policy and Management Act of 1976, Compliance UR - http://libproxy.lib.unc.edu/login?url=http://search.proquest.com/docview/36421642?accountid=14244 L2 - http://vb3lk7eb4t.search.serialssolutions.com/?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&rfr_id=info:sid/Environmental+Impact+Statements%3A+Digests&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=report&rft.jtitle=&rft.atitle=&rft.au=&rft.aulast=&rft.aufirst=&rft.date=2002-01-03&rft.volume=&rft.issue=&rft.spage=&rft.isbn=&rft.btitle=PHOENIX+PROJECT%2C+LANDER+COUNTY%2C+NEVADA.&rft.title=PHOENIX+PROJECT%2C+LANDER+COUNTY%2C+NEVADA.&rft.issn=&rft_id=info:doi/ LA - English DB - ProQuest Environmental Science Collection N1 - Name - Department of the Interior, Bureau of Land Management, Battle Mountain, Nevada; DOI N1 - Date revised - 2006-05-01 N1 - SuppNotes - Final. Preparation date: January 3, 2002 N1 - Last updated - 2011-12-16 ER - TY - RPRT T1 - LEMHI PASS NATIONAL HISTORIC LANDMARK MANAGEMENT PLAN, DILLON RANGER DISTRICT, BEAVERHEAD-DEERLODGE NATIONAL FOREST, MONTANA AND LEADORE RANGER DISTRICT, SALMON-CHALLIS NATIONAL FOREST, IDAHO. AN - 36421870; 9117 AB - PURPOSE: The implementation of a management plan for the Lemhi Pass National Historic Landmark in the Dillon Ranger District of the Beaverhead-Deerlodge National Forest, Montana and the Dilllon Ranger District of the Salmon-Challis National Forest, Idaho is proposed. For centuries, Lemhi Pass has been an important route of travel over the Continental Divide between the Lemhi Valley in Idaho and the Horse Prairie Valley in Montana. In 1805, the Lewis and Clark expedition crossed Lemhi Pass on their westward journey. The pass was designated a National Historic Landmark for its significance to the Lewis and Clark expedition; it is an important section of the 3,700-mile Lewis and Clark National Historic Trail. Nearly 200 years after the passage of the expedition, the pass has retained its natural appearance. Present facilities at the site are inadequate to provide access to and enjoyment of the area and to protect the natural features that support the historic character of the area. Six alternatives, including a No Action Alternative (Alternative 2), which would continue the existing management regime, are considered in this final EIS. All action alternatives would address scenery and recreation management, traffic safety, travel management, visitor programs and services, and vegetation management. The preferred alternative (Alternative 9) would fit within standards for rehabilitation of historic properties, altering or adding facilities to the historic landscape to meet changing uses while retaining the landmark's historic character. More specifically, the plan would include the withdrawal of the landmark and adjoining lands, encompassing a total of 1,505.29 acres, from mineral entry; implement a low to moderate level of development over the next 20 years, while providing supplemental facilities for the 2003-2006 bicentennial commemoration; provide visitor facilities, including road improvements and parking, on the Montana side of the pass; provide additional facilities at the Sacajawea Memorial Camp, which be operated for day use only through the bicentennial; provide a Westward View parking area/interpretative site and a 0.3-mile trail to an overlook; provide interpretative facilities and a parking area in Lemhi Pass; authorize outfitter and/or guide services, educational institutions, and/or a concession compatible with the historic interpretation opportunities at the site; and emphasize off-site visitor education. POSITIVE IMPACTS: In addition to preserving the historic route of the Lewis and Clark expedition, the plan would provide for public access to and enjoyment of the area. This is particularly appropriate based on renewed interest sparked by the national bicentennial commemoration of the expedition. NEGATIVE IMPACTS: Increasing visitation and new facilities, particularly during the bicentennial commemoration, would result in some impacts to the natural character of the landmark and some trampling of vegetation and soil compaction. Facility construction would result in a slight net loss of sagebrush/grassland and forest habitat. Habitat changes could significantly affect Canada lynx, which use the pass as a movement corridor. Road changes would probably affect the historic stage road just west of the pass. Other facility changes would also alter the historic setting. Mineral entry withdrawals would preclude access to the affected lands for economically viable removal of minerals. LEGAL MANDATES: National Forest Management Act of 1976 (16 U.S.C. 1600 et seq.) and National Historic Preservation Act of 1966, as amended (16 U.S.C. 470 et seq.). PRIOR REFERENCES: For the abstract of the draft EIS, see 01-0142D, Volume 25, Number 2. JF - EPA number: 020000, 276 pages, January 2, 2002 PY - 2002 KW - Parks, Refuges and Forests KW - Endangered Species (Animals) KW - Forests KW - Historic Sites KW - Mineral Resources KW - Parking KW - Recreation Facilities KW - Recreation Resources KW - Recreation Resources Management KW - Scenic Areas KW - Trails KW - Vegetation KW - Wildlife Habitat KW - Beaverhead-Deerlodge National Forest KW - Idaho KW - Montana KW - Salmon-Challis National Forest KW - National Historic Preservation Act of 1966, Historic Sites KW - National Forest Management Act of 1976, Compliance UR - http://libproxy.lib.unc.edu/login?url=http://search.proquest.com/docview/36421870?accountid=14244 L2 - http://vb3lk7eb4t.search.serialssolutions.com/?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&rfr_id=info:sid/Environmental+Impact+Statements%3A+Digests&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=report&rft.jtitle=&rft.atitle=&rft.au=&rft.aulast=&rft.aufirst=&rft.date=2002-01-02&rft.volume=&rft.issue=&rft.spage=&rft.isbn=&rft.btitle=LEMHI+PASS+NATIONAL+HISTORIC+LANDMARK+MANAGEMENT+PLAN%2C+DILLON+RANGER+DISTRICT%2C+BEAVERHEAD-DEERLODGE+NATIONAL+FOREST%2C+MONTANA+AND+LEADORE+RANGER+DISTRICT%2C+SALMON-CHALLIS+NATIONAL+FOREST%2C+IDAHO.&rft.title=LEMHI+PASS+NATIONAL+HISTORIC+LANDMARK+MANAGEMENT+PLAN%2C+DILLON+RANGER+DISTRICT%2C+BEAVERHEAD-DEERLODGE+NATIONAL+FOREST%2C+MONTANA+AND+LEADORE+RANGER+DISTRICT%2C+SALMON-CHALLIS+NATIONAL+FOREST%2C+IDAHO.&rft.issn=&rft_id=info:doi/ LA - English DB - ProQuest Environmental Science Collection N1 - Name - Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Dillon, Montana and Leadore, Idaho; DA N1 - Date revised - 2006-05-01 N1 - SuppNotes - Final. Preparation date: January 2, 2002 N1 - Last updated - 2011-12-16 ER - TY - GEN T1 - Springwood: Birthplace and Home to Franklin D. Roosevelt. Teaching with Historic Places. AN - 62295498; ED463231 AB - Springwood, the birthplace and home of Franklin Delano Roosevelt, is a large, rambling structure faced with stucco and fieldstone, situated in a landscaped clearing on a bluff overlooking the Hudson River. Roosevelt was born there to a family of wealth and position on January 30, 1882. It is the only site in the U.S. where a president was born, maintained a lifelong connection, and lies buried. This lesson, one of a series that brings the stories of historic places into classrooms across the country, is based on the National Register of Historic Places registration file for the "Home of Franklin Delano Roosevelt National Historic Site" and other source material. The lesson can be used in U.S. history, social studies, and geography courses in units on FDR's presidency, the Great Depression, the New Deal, and World War II. It is divided into eight sections: "About This Lesson" (gives student objectives, materials needed); "Getting Started: Inquiry Question"; "Setting the Stage: Historical Context"; "Locating the Site: Maps" (New York State and surrounding area; Springwood); "Determining the Facts: Readings" (Early Years and Influences; Physical Challenge and the Road Ahead; Political Life in an Era of Crisis; International Scene at Hyde Park); "Visual Evidence: Images" (Aerial View of Springwood;. Springwood; WPA Flood Project, 1937; Roosevelts with King George VI and Queen Elizabeth; Four Freedoms Poster); "Putting It All Together: Activities" (Lifestyles; Remembering When); and "Supplementary Resources." (BT) AU - Scholl, Charlotte Ofca Y1 - 2002 PY - 2002 DA - 2002 SP - 37 PB - Teaching with Historic Places, National Register of Historic Places, National Park Service, 1849 C Street, N.W., Suite NC400, Washington, DC 20240. For full text: http://www.cr.nps.gov/nr/twhp/wwwlps/lessons/82springwood/82 springwood.htm. KW - National Register of Historic Places KW - New York (Hyde Park) KW - Roosevelt (Franklin D) KW - Hudson River KW - National History Standards KW - ERIC, Resources in Education (RIE) KW - Practitioners KW - Teachers KW - Heritage Education KW - Presidents of the United States KW - Housing KW - Built Environment KW - Social Studies KW - Elementary Secondary Education KW - Student Educational Objectives KW - Primary Sources KW - Curriculum Enrichment KW - United States History KW - Historic Sites UR - http://libproxy.lib.unc.edu/login?url=http://search.proquest.com/docview/62295498?accountid=14244 LA - English DB - ERIC N1 - Last updated - 2017-02-24 ER - TY - GEN T1 - Chicago's Columbus Park: The Prairie Idealized. Teaching with Historic Places. AN - 62293702; ED463214 AB - Twenty-four year old Jens Jensen came to the United States, settled in Chicago (Illinois), and promptly fell in love with the Midwest's prairie landscape. Although some thought that prairie was boring, monotonous, and ordinary, Jensen saw great beauty in the tree-filled groves, long winding rivers, natural rock formations and waterfalls, and the flat stretches filled with colorful native grasses and wild flowers. Jens Jensen began designing Chicago's Columbus Park in 1915 on a 150-acre parcel of land, where he attempted to interpret the native landscape of Illinois as comprehensively as possible. This lesson is based on the National Register of Historic Places registration file, "Columbus Park." The lesson can be used to teach units on landscape design, urbanization, and conservationism in the early 20th century, or in an interdisciplinary unit on indigenous regional plants and leisure time combining biology and sociology. It is divided into: "About This Lesson"; "Getting Started: Inquiry Question"; "Setting the Stage: Historical Context"; "Locating the Site: Maps" (West Park System, Chicago, 1917; Jensen's Original Plan for Columbus Park); "Determining the Facts: Readings" (An American Garden; Columbus Park--The Prairie Idealized; Beauty of the Wild); "Visual Evidence: Images" (Recent Photograph of the Prairie; Stone Outcropping, c. 1910; Natural Prairie River, c. 1911; Excavation of the Lagoon 1916; Lagoon with Boaters, c. 1920; Council Ring with Children, 1920s; Original Swimming Hole with Children, c. 1935); "Putting It All Together: Activities" (Save That Site; Green Scene); and "Supplementary Resources." (BT) AU - Bachrach, Julia Sniderman AU - Nathan, Jo Ann Y1 - 2002 PY - 2002 DA - 2002 SP - 33 PB - Teaching with Historic Places, National Register of Historic Places, National Park Service, 1849 C Street NW, Suite NC400, Washington, DC 20240. For full text: http://www.cr.nps.gov/nr/twhp/wwwlps/lessons/81columbus/81columbus.htm. KW - Illinois (Chicago) KW - Landscapes KW - National Register of Historic Places KW - Prairies KW - ERIC, Resources in Education (RIE) KW - Practitioners KW - Teachers KW - Heritage Education KW - Cultural Context KW - Social Studies KW - Secondary Education KW - Physical Environment KW - Student Research KW - Parks KW - Conservation (Environment) KW - Student Educational Objectives KW - Primary Sources KW - Interdisciplinary Approach KW - Curriculum Enrichment KW - Historic Sites UR - http://libproxy.lib.unc.edu/login?url=http://search.proquest.com/docview/62293702?accountid=14244 LA - English DB - ERIC N1 - Last updated - 2017-02-24 ER - TY - GEN T1 - The Freeman School: Building Prairie Communities. Teaching with Historic Places. AN - 62293217; ED463215 AB - The Freeman School, originally called the Red-Brick School House, served the community of Blakely Township, Nebraska from 1872 to 1967. It is representative of the one-room schools that once dotted the western landscape of the United States. The Freeman School served not only as an educational center but also as the church, a meeting hall, the township polling place, and as the social and political center of the community. At present, the National Park Service maintains and preserves this historic structure. This lesson is based on the National Register of Historic Places registration file "Freeman Homestead and Freeman School" and other sources. The lesson can be used in U.S. history, social studies, and geography courses in units on westward expansion and homesteading, the history of education in the United States, early mapping of lands, and studies of U.S. cultural developments. It is divided into: "About This Lesson"; "Getting Started: Inquiry Question"; "Setting the Stage: Historical Context"; "Locating the Site: Maps" (Plat Map of Blakely Township); "Determining the Facts: Readings" (Red Brick School; Community's Experience; Treasurer's Account Book); "Visual Evidence: Images" (Red Brick School; Teacher and Pupils, 1914; Children in Front of School, 1913; Interior of Freeman School; Children at Play); "Putting It All Together: Activities" (And Today in the School; To Preserve or Not to Preserve; How Did My Town Grow?); and "Supplementary Resources." (BT) AU - Lange-Daggs, Lorna Y1 - 2002 PY - 2002 DA - 2002 SP - 34 PB - Teaching with Historic Places, National Register of Historic Places, National Park Service, 1849 C Street NW, Suite NC400, Washington, DC 20240. For full text: http://www.cr.nps.gov/nr/twhp/wwwlps/lessons/80homestead/80homestead.htm. KW - Homesteading KW - National Register of Historic Places KW - Prairies KW - Westward Movement (United States) KW - ERIC, Resources in Education (RIE) KW - Practitioners KW - Teachers KW - Heritage Education KW - Cultural Context KW - Built Environment KW - Social Studies KW - Community Development KW - Secondary Education KW - One Teacher Schools KW - Student Research KW - School Buildings KW - Student Educational Objectives KW - Primary Sources KW - Curriculum Enrichment KW - Geography KW - United States History KW - Historic Sites UR - http://libproxy.lib.unc.edu/login?url=http://search.proquest.com/docview/62293217?accountid=14244 LA - English DB - ERIC N1 - Last updated - 2017-02-24 ER - TY - GEN T1 - The National Register of Historic Places. AN - 62287962; ED464874 AB - This journal contains articles and materials to help teachers instruct students about U.S. historical and cultural heritage. Articles and materials are: "The National Register of Historic Places Today" (C. D. Shull); "The (Economic) Value of National Register Listing" (D. D. Rypkema); "The National Register and Heritage Areas" (B. Barrett); "Heritage Tourism" (C. M. Hargrove); "National Register's Role in BLM's Cultural Heritage Program" (K. Winthrop); "HABS/HAER and the National Register--A Symbiotic Relationship" (C. LaVoie); "Integration Is the Key" (J. H. Sprinkle, Jr.); "National Register--A Road Map to Preserving Sense of Place" (F. L. Oaks); "How a Florida CLG Uses the National Register" (J. S, Matthews; B. Jeffrey; R. D. Smith); "Boom Times in Colorado and Their Effect on the National Register" (M. Wolfe); "Cultural Landscapes and the National Register" (C. Goetcheus); "Georgia's Agricultural Heritage and the National Register" (D. P. Messick; J. W. Joseph); "Documenting Minnesota's Agricultural Heritage--The Nansen Historic District" (D. Gimmestad); "Multiple Property Documentation for Planning and Interpreting Archeological Resources" (E. M. Seibert); "Historic Residential Suburbs in the National Resources" (L. F. McClelland); "Public Housing in the United States, 1933-1949" (P. R. Lusignan); "Using the National Register as a Teaching Tool" (W. B. Morton III); "Spreading the Word--Fulfilling the National Register's Mission Online" (B. L. Savage); "Taking It on the Road--National Register Documentation Becomes Available over the Internet" (S. D. Pope);"Researchers Take Advantage of the National Register Collection" (R. Quaide and H. Cushman); "Section 106 and the National Register" (T. H. Klein); "Discover Our Shared Heritage" (P. Andrus); and "Placing Students in the Past To Understand the Present" (B. M. Boland). (BT) AU - Greenberg, Ronald M. Y1 - 2002 PY - 2002 DA - 2002 SP - 54 PB - CRM, U.S. Department of the Interior, National Park Service, 1849 C Street, NW, Suite 350NC, Washington, D.C. 20240. Tel: 202-343-3411; Fax: 202-343-5260; e-mail: crmmag@nps.gov. For full text: http://www.nps.gov/. VL - 25 IS - 1 KW - National Register of Historic Places KW - Cultural Resources KW - ERIC, Resources in Education (RIE) KW - Practitioners KW - Teachers KW - Intermediate Grades KW - Heritage Education KW - Instructional Effectiveness KW - Cultural Awareness KW - Social Studies KW - Material Culture KW - Student Educational Objectives KW - Primary Sources KW - United States History KW - Historic Sites KW - Secondary Education UR - http://libproxy.lib.unc.edu/login?url=http://search.proquest.com/docview/62287962?accountid=14244 LA - English DB - ERIC N1 - Last updated - 2017-02-24 ER - TY - BOOK T1 - Currents and Undercurrents: An Administrative History of Lake Roosevelt National Recreation Area. AN - 62207001; ED476001 AB - The 1,259-mile Columbia River flows out of Canada and across eastern Washington state, forming the border between Washington and Oregon. In 1941 the federal government dammed the Columbia River at the north end of Grand Coulee, creating a man-made reservoir named Lake Roosevelt that inundated homes, farms, and businesses, and disrupted the lives of many. Although Congress never enacted specific authorization to create a park, it passed generic legislation that gave the Park Service authority at the National Recreation Area (NRA). Lake Roosevelt's shoreline totals more than 500 miles of cliffs and gentle slopes. The Lake Roosevelt National Recreation Area (LARO) was officially created in 1946. This historical study documents the long and complex story of the establishment of LARO and how it has been managed since its creation. Following informational materials and an introduction, the study's chapters are: (1)"When Rivers Ran Free"; (2) "The River Becomes a Lake"; (3) "A Long Road Lies Ahead: Establishing Lake Roosevelt National Recreation Area"; (4) "Agreements and Disagreements: From Tri-Party Agreement to Multi-Party Agreement"; (6) "Family Vacation Lake: Recreation Planning and Management"; (7) "Building and Maintaining the Park: Administrative and Visitor Facilities"; (8) "Changing Stories: Interpretation"; (9) "From Simple to Complex: Cultural Resources Management"; (10) "An Uphill Struggle: Natural Resources Management"; (11) "Regaining Ground: Leases and Special Use Permits"; and (12) "Echoes of the Past: Future Issues." Includes seven appendices and an extensive bibliography. (BT) AU - McKay, Kathryn L. AU - Renk, Nancy F. Y1 - 2002/01// PY - 2002 DA - January 2002 SP - 589 PB - Lake Roosevelt Recreation Area, 1008 Crest Drive, Coulee Dam, WA 99116. KW - Cultural Resources KW - Management Practices KW - National Park Service KW - Reservoirs KW - ERIC, Resources in Education (RIE) KW - Rivers KW - Land Use KW - Recreational Facilities KW - Physical Geography KW - Government Role KW - Social Studies KW - Parks KW - Higher Education KW - United States History UR - http://libproxy.lib.unc.edu/login?url=http://search.proquest.com/docview/62207001?accountid=14244 LA - English DB - ERIC N1 - Last updated - 2017-02-24 ER - TY - GEN T1 - These Honored Dead: The Battle of Rivers Bridge and Civil War Combat Casualties. Teaching with Historic Places. AN - 62203772; ED467873 AB - Encountering the U.S. Civil War on a smaller, human scale makes the conflict more approachable, vivid, and real. Rivers Bridge State Historic Site (South Carolina) offers a glimpse of the Civil War on such a scale. The small area allows visitors to comprehend the entire battlefield, its tactics, and to see how veteran troops near the end of the war sought to avoid high casualties. The relatively few casualties, most identified through historical research, are people, not numbers, and they convey the true human tragedy of this battle and all of the Civil War battles. This lesson plan, based on the National Register of Historic Places file for Rivers Bridge can be used in teaching U.S. history, social studies, or geography units on the Civil War or the South. The lesson cites educational objectives and materials needed. It is divided into eight sections: (1) "About This Lesson"; (2) "Getting Started: Inquiry Question"; (3) "Setting the Stage: Historical Context"; (4) "Locating the Site: Maps" (Battlefield at Rivers Bridge); (5) "Determining the Facts: Readings" (Surviving on the Battlefield, 1965; Official Reports; Soldiers' Accounts); (6) "Visual Evidence: Images" (Sherman's March through South Carolina; Rivers Bridge Battlefield; Pvt. Edgar W. Cherry, 1865; Edgar W. Cherry, ca. 1890; Confederate Monument (front); Confederate Monument (rear)); (7) "Putting It All Together: Activities" (Your Account of a Civil War Battle; Following the Local Boys through the War; Memories of War; Monuments); and (8) "Supplementary Resources." (BT) AU - Bell, Dan Y1 - 2002 PY - 2002 DA - 2002 SP - 35 PB - Teaching with Historic Places, National Register of Historic Places, National Park Service, 1849 C Street NW, Ste. NC400, Washington, DC 20240. For full text: http://www.cr.nps.gov/nr/twhp/wwwlps/lessons/94rivers/94rivers.htm/. KW - Site Visits KW - South Carolina KW - National History Standards KW - National Register of Historic Places KW - ERIC, Resources in Education (RIE) KW - Teachers KW - Practitioners KW - Intermediate Grades KW - Heritage Education KW - Social Studies KW - Secondary Education KW - Civil War (United States) KW - Student Educational Objectives KW - Primary Sources KW - Curriculum Enrichment KW - State History KW - Geography KW - United States History KW - Historic Sites UR - http://libproxy.lib.unc.edu/login?url=http://search.proquest.com/docview/62203772?accountid=14244 LA - English DB - ERIC N1 - Last updated - 2017-02-24 ER - TY - GEN T1 - Savannah, Georgia: The Lasting Legacy of Colonial City Planning. Teaching with Historic Places. AN - 62201581; ED467870 AB - Strolling through the old city of Savannah, Georgia's rigid, grid pattern streets, down its linear brick walkways, past over 1,100 residential and public buildings of unparalleled architectural richness and diversity, visitors and residents come to appreciate the original plan that has existed intact since Savannah's founding in 1733. Twenty-four tree-shaded, park-like open spaces called squares are the essence of the city. Savannah is one of the few surviving colonial city plans in the United States, a testament to the ingenuity of Georgia's founders. This lesson is based on the National Register of Historic Places file for "Savannah Historic District." The lesson plan can be used to teach U.S. colonial history, the antebellum era and the cotton economy, and the rise of cities in the United States. It cites relevant National History Standards, objectives for students, and materials needed. The lesson plan is divided into eight sections: (1) "About This Lesson"; (2) "Getting Started: Inquiry Questions"; (3) "Setting the Stage: Historical Context"; (4) "Locating the Site: Maps" (British and Spanish Claims in the Southeast; Portion of the Southeast Atlantic Coastline); (5) "Determining the Facts: Readings" (Establishing Savannah; The City Plan and How It Was Built; Good Intentions Don't Always Last); (6) "Visual Evidence: Images" (View of Savannah, 1734; Detail from View of Savannah; Savannah, 1800; Savannah, 1818; Panorama of Savannah, 1837); (7) "Putting It All Together: Activities" (Draw the City Plan of Savannah; Then and Now in Your Town); and (8)"Supplementary Resources." (BT) AU - Kratzer, Judson Y1 - 2002 PY - 2002 DA - 2002 SP - 35 PB - Teaching with Historic Places, National Register of Historic Places, National Park Service, 1849 C Street NW, Suite NC400, Washington, DC 20240. Tel: 202-208-6843. For full text: http://www.cr.nps.gov/nr/twhp/wwwlps/lessons/83savannah/83savannah.htm/. KW - Historical Preservation KW - National History Standards KW - National Register of Historic Places KW - Antebellum Period (United States) KW - Georgia (Savannah) KW - ERIC, Resources in Education (RIE) KW - Teachers KW - Practitioners KW - Intermediate Grades KW - Heritage Education KW - Urban Planning KW - Colonial History (United States) KW - Built Environment KW - Social Studies KW - Secondary Education KW - Local History KW - Student Educational Objectives KW - Primary Sources KW - Curriculum Enrichment KW - Historic Sites UR - http://libproxy.lib.unc.edu/login?url=http://search.proquest.com/docview/62201581?accountid=14244 LA - English DB - ERIC N1 - Last updated - 2017-02-24 ER - TY - GEN T1 - Saratoga: The Tide Turns on the Frontier. Teaching with Historic Places. AN - 62201542; ED467874 AB - In 1777, out of the confusion, fear, and chaos of battle, soldiers of the Continental Army forged a victory over professional British and German soldiers near Saratoga (New York). The two battles fought there changed the course of the American Revolution and insured the independence of the former British colonies that became the United States of America. This lesson plan, based on materials from the archives at Saratoga National Historical Park, can be used in U.S. history, social studies, and geography courses in units on the American Revolution or New York state history. The lesson lists educational objectives and materials needed. It is divided into eight sections: (1) "About This Lesson"; (2) "Getting Started: Inquiry Question"; (3) "Setting the Stage: Historical Context"; (4) "Locating the Site: Maps" (New York and Surrounding Region; Campaign for the Lake Champlain-Hudson Valley); (5) "Determining the Facts: Readings" (Battles of Saratoga; 18th-Century Warfare; Voices of Battle); (6) "Visual Evidence: Images" (Saratoga National Historical Park; Bemis Heights Today; Catherine Schuyler Torches a Wheatfield; "Capitulation de Burgoyne a Saratoga"); (7) "Putting It All Together: Activities" (Council of War; War Continues; Soldiers and Settlement); and (8) "Supplementary Resources." (BT) AU - Parillo, James Y1 - 2002 PY - 2002 DA - 2002 SP - 34 PB - Teaching with Historic Places, National Register of Historic Places, National Park Service, 1849 C Street NW, Ste. NC400, Washington, DC 20240. For full text: http://www.cr.nps.gov/nr/twhp/wwwlps/lessons/93saratoga/93saratoga.htm/. KW - Site Visits KW - National History Standards KW - National Register of Historic Places KW - New York KW - ERIC, Resources in Education (RIE) KW - Teachers KW - Practitioners KW - Intermediate Grades KW - Heritage Education KW - Social Studies KW - Secondary Education KW - Student Educational Objectives KW - Revolutionary War (United States) KW - Primary Sources KW - Curriculum Enrichment KW - State History KW - Geography KW - United States History KW - Historic Sites UR - http://libproxy.lib.unc.edu/login?url=http://search.proquest.com/docview/62201542?accountid=14244 LA - English DB - ERIC N1 - Last updated - 2017-02-24 ER - TY - GEN T1 - Coffeyville, Kansas: The Town That Stopped the Dalton Gang. Teaching with Historic Places. AN - 62201405; ED471524 AB - By 1890 the legendary outlaws of the 1870s and 1880s were mostly dead or in prison. When Luther Perkins erected his new bank building in Coffeyville, Kansas, a bank robbery was the farthest thing from his mind. But the Dalton cousins, former Coffeyville residents, were interested in the bank because they wanted to outdo the James gang by using the town as a setting for a spectacular double bank robbery. The robbery ended, however, with four of the five outlaws dead. Coffeyville became famous in the nation as the town that stopped the Daltons. This lesson is based on a National Register of Historic Places file, on studies of outlaws of the U.S. West, and on a contemporary description of the robbery. The lesson can be used in U.S. history, social studies, and geography courses and in units on the post-Civil War era, the settlement and culture of the West, or Kansas history. It cites educational objectives and lists materials needed. It is divided into eight sections: (1) "About This Lesson"; (2) "Getting Started: Inquiry Question"; (3) "Setting the Stage: Historical Context"; (4) "Locating the Site: Maps" (Coffeyville, Kansas and Surrounding Area); (5) "Determining the Facts: Readings" (Renegades and Outlaws; Dalton Gang; People of Coffeyville Say 'Enough!'); (6) "Visual Evidence: Images" (C.M. Condon and Company Bank, 1892; Condon Bank after the Attempted Robbery; 'Death Alley,' Coffeyville, Kansas; Bodies of the Dalton Gang After the Shoot-Out; Condon National Bank Building Today); (7) "Putting It All Together: Activities" (Myth of the Outlaw; Taking the Law into Our Own Hands; Locally Famous Events in the Community); and (8) "Supplementary Resources." (BT) AU - Hunter, Kathleen Y1 - 2002 PY - 2002 DA - 2002 SP - 33 PB - Teaching with Historic Places, National Register of Historic Places, National Park Service, 1849 C Street, NW, Suite NC400, Washington, DC 20240. For full text: http://www.cr.nps.gov/nr/twhp/wwwlps/lessons/. KW - National History Standards KW - National Register of Historic Places KW - ERIC, Resources in Education (RIE) KW - Practitioners KW - Teachers KW - Heritage Education KW - Social Studies KW - Student Educational Objectives KW - Primary Sources KW - United States History KW - Historic Sites KW - Middle Schools KW - Secondary Education UR - http://libproxy.lib.unc.edu/login?url=http://search.proquest.com/docview/62201405?accountid=14244 LA - English DB - ERIC N1 - Last updated - 2017-02-24 ER - TY - GEN T1 - Making Connections. A Curriculum and Activity Guide to Mammoth Cave National Park. [Grades] 4-5. AN - 62201172; ED468212 AB - The National Park Service originated with the passage of the Organic Act of 1916. Since then the National Park Service and the U.S. government have designated many places to be protected, either because of their historical significance or natural significance to the nation. In Kentucky, Mammoth Cave National Park is one of four national parks. Each National Park Service area has its own unique cultural, biological, and geological significance. Cultural heritage (people), vegetation (plants), wildlife (animals), and landforms (rocks) are the reasons the parks were set aside. This multidisciplinary activity guide for Mammoth Cave National Park is for students in grades 4 and 5. The guide provides detailed instructions for implementation of the diverse activities. It is divided into three charts: (1) "Subject Chart"; (2) "Setting Chart"; and (3) "KERA Goals Chart"; and 10 activities: (1) "Plotting Protected Places"; (2) "Exploring Emblems"; (3) "Acorn Mix-Up"; (4) "Case of the Mysterious Rocks"; (5) "Current Song"; (6) "Clear as Mud"; (7) "Kentucky Capsules"; (8) "In Remembrance"; (9) "Findings from the Field"; and (10) "Cover All!" (BT) Y1 - 2002 PY - 2002 DA - 2002 SP - 78 PB - Mammoth Cave National Park, P.O. Box 7, Mammoth Cave, KY 42259. Tel: 270-758-2251; Fax: 270-773-2111; e-mail: MACA_Park_Information@nps.gov. For full text: http://www.nps.gov/maca/learnhome/curricula.htm/. KW - Site Visits KW - Kentucky KW - ERIC, Resources in Education (RIE) KW - Teachers KW - Practitioners KW - Intermediate Grades KW - Heritage Education KW - Environmental Education KW - Social Studies KW - Natural Resources KW - Grade 5 KW - Physical Environment KW - Grade 4 KW - Geology KW - Student Educational Objectives KW - Primary Sources KW - Interdisciplinary Approach UR - http://libproxy.lib.unc.edu/login?url=http://search.proquest.com/docview/62201172?accountid=14244 LA - English DB - ERIC N1 - Last updated - 2017-02-24 ER - TY - GEN T1 - The Washington Monument: Tribute in Stone. Teaching with Historic Places. AN - 62200668; ED468410 AB - The Washington Monument (District of Columbia) is one of the most recognizable structures in the United States. Its prominence comes because it commemorates George Washington, who remains one of this country's most admired leaders. The history of the monument reflects Washington's contributions to the development of the United States and shows how people have debated the best way to honor important citizens. The lesson is based on the National Register of Historic Places registration file for the Washington Monument, the visitor's guide to the monument, source material about George Washington, and the structure built to honor him. The lesson plan can be used in teaching units on the American Revolution, the early Federal period, or the formation of a national identity, a collective memory, and interpretations of the past. The lesson is divided into eight sections: (1) "About This Lesson"; (2) "Getting Started" (Photograph Analysis Worksheet); (3) "Locating the Site: Maps" (Portion of L'Enfant Plan for Washington); (4) "Determining the Facts: Readings and Documents" (George Washington and the Early Republic; Samuel Blodgett's Broadside; Construction of the Monument; Finishing the Monument); (5) "Visual Evidence: Images" (The Washington Monument; Robert Mills's Design for the Washington Monument; The Washington Monument during the Civil War; Alternative Designs for the Washington Monument); (6) "Setting the Stage"; (7) "Putting It All Together: Activities" (Qualities of a Leader; Designing a Memorial; Local Memorial Study); and (8) "Summary." (MR) AU - Kopin, Stephanie A. Y1 - 2002 PY - 2002 DA - 2002 SP - 22 PB - Teaching with Historic Places, National Register of Historic Places, National Park Service, 1849 C Street NW, Suite NC400, Washington, DC 20240. Tel: 202-208-6843. For full text: http://www.cr.nps.gov/nr/twhp/wwwlps/lessons/62wash/62wash.htm. KW - National Register of Historic Places KW - Washington (George) KW - Washington Monument KW - Memorials KW - ERIC, Resources in Education (RIE) KW - Practitioners KW - Teachers KW - Heritage Education KW - Presidents of the United States KW - Built Environment KW - Social Studies KW - History Instruction KW - Primary Sources KW - United States History KW - Historic Sites KW - Middle Schools KW - Secondary Education UR - http://libproxy.lib.unc.edu/login?url=http://search.proquest.com/docview/62200668?accountid=14244 LA - English DB - ERIC N1 - Last updated - 2017-02-24 ER - TY - GEN T1 - The Emerald Necklace: Boston's Green Connection. Teaching with Historic Places. AN - 62199752; ED468216 AB - In 1870, Boston, Massachusetts, was an overcrowded, noisy, and dirty city. Concerned with the health and happiness of Bostonians restricted to these unhealthy surroundings, the city hired Frederick Law Olmsted to design a park system. The series of parks he designed over the next several years is known as the Emerald Necklace. From lovely waterways to botanical gardens to peaceful meadows to tree museums, each plays a vital role in linking the citizens of Boston together through nature. This lesson plan, based on the National Register of Historic Places registration file, "Olmstead Park System" and other sources, can be used in U.S. history, social studies, and geography courses or in units on urban expansion in the late 19th century or city planning. The lesson cites National History Standards and lists educational objectives and materials needed. It is divided into eight sections: (1) "About This Lesson"; (2) "Getting Started: Inquiry Question"; (3) "Setting the Stage: Historical Context"; (4) "Locating the Site: Maps" (Boston, 1775; Boston Today); (5) "Determining the Facts: Readings" (Boston's First Parks; Green Connection; Creating the Jewels of the Emerald Necklace); (6) "Visual Evidence: Images" (19th-century Boston; Emerald Necklace; Dredging the Back Bay, 1882; Muddy River, 1892; Muddy River, 1920); (7) "Putting It All Together: Activities" (Plan Your Own Greenway; Parks Brochure; Landscape Fun); and (8) "Supplementary Resources." (BT) AU - Marsh, Lisa AU - Snow, Pamela Y1 - 2002 PY - 2002 DA - 2002 SP - 30 PB - Teaching with Historic Places, National Register of Historic Places, National Park Service, 1849 C Street NW, Ste. NC400, Washington, DC 20240. For full text: http://www.cr.nps.gov/nr/twhp/wwwlps/lessons/86bostonparks/86bostonparks.htm/. KW - Massachusetts (Boston) KW - National History Standards KW - National Register of Historic Places KW - ERIC, Resources in Education (RIE) KW - Teachers KW - Practitioners KW - Intermediate Grades KW - Heritage Education KW - Social Studies KW - Secondary Education KW - Physical Environment KW - Local History KW - Parks KW - Teaching Guides KW - Urban Environment KW - Student Educational Objectives KW - Primary Sources KW - Curriculum Enrichment KW - United States History KW - Historic Sites UR - http://libproxy.lib.unc.edu/login?url=http://search.proquest.com/docview/62199752?accountid=14244 LA - English DB - ERIC N1 - Last updated - 2017-02-24 ER - TY - GEN T1 - Making Connections. A Curriculum and Activity Guide to Mammoth Cave National Park. [Grades] K-3. AN - 62199396; ED467625 AB - Kentucky's Mammoth Cave National Park is important because of its diversity of life on the surface and underground. Some of the plants in the park include trees such as oaks, hickories, tulip poplars, sycamores, and many types of bushes. The animal population is also very diverse and includes bats, squirrels, deer, raccoons, opossums, chipmunks, and many birds. The main rocks found in the park are limestone, sandstone, shale, and gypsum. The most important link that ties it all together is the water, the Green River on the surface and the groundwater in the cave. This multidisciplinary activity guide for Mammoth Cave National Park contains activities for students in grades K-3. All the activities in the guide provide detailed instructions for student implementation. The guide consists of three parts: (1) "Subject Chart"; (2) "Setting Chart"; and (3) "KERA Goals Chart." It also included ten activities: (1) "Park Puzzle"; (2) "Mammoth Cave Mobile"; (3) "Nature/Unnature Walk"; (4) "Shapes of the Season"; (5) "Tasty Trees"; (6) "Squirrels Need a Home or Bats Need a Cave"; (7) "A Place Protected"; (8) "Clay Caves"; (9) "Webbing the Wonders"; and (10) "Card Conclusion." (BT) Y1 - 2002 PY - 2002 DA - 2002 SP - 60 PB - Mammoth Cave National Park, P.O. Box 7, Mammoth Cave, KY 42259. Tel: 270-758-2251; Fax: 270-773-2111; e-mail: MACA_Park_Information@nps.gov. For full text: http://www.nps.gov/maca/learnhome/curricula.htm/. KW - Kentucky KW - Site Visits KW - ERIC, Resources in Education (RIE) KW - Teachers KW - Practitioners KW - Heritage Education KW - Natural Resources KW - Primary Education KW - Physical Environment KW - Environmental Education KW - Social Studies KW - Geology KW - Student Educational Objectives KW - Primary Sources KW - Interdisciplinary Approach UR - http://libproxy.lib.unc.edu/login?url=http://search.proquest.com/docview/62199396?accountid=14244 LA - English DB - ERIC N1 - Last updated - 2017-02-24 ER - TY - GEN T1 - The Battle of Midway: Turning the Tide in the Pacific. Teaching with Historic Places. AN - 62198983; ED467872 AB - Inhabited by humans for less than a century, Midway Atoll dominated the world news for a brief time in the early summer of 1942. These tiny Pacific islands were the focus of a brutal struggle between the Japanese Imperial Navy and the U.S. Pacific Fleet. The U.S. victory here ended Japan's seemingly unstoppable advance across the Pacific and began a U.S. offensive that would end 3 years later at the doorstep of the home islands. This lesson plan is based on the National Historic Landmark file "World War II Facilities at Midway" and historic accounts of the campaign. The lesson can be used in U.S. history, social studies, and geography courses in units about World War II. It cites relevant National History Standards, objectives for students, and materials needed. The lesson is divided into eight sections: (1) "About This Lesson"; (2) "Getting Started: Inquiry Questions"; (3) "Setting the Stage: Historical Context"; (4) "Locating the Site: Maps" (Japanese Offensive, 1941-42; Midway Atoll); (5) "Determining the Facts: Readings" (Out of Obscurity; Battle of Midway; Voices from Midway); (6) "Visual Evidence: Images" (Midway Atoll, 1941; Midway after Japanese Attack, 1942; Bombing of U.S. Carrier Yorktown, 1942; Dive Bombers, 1942; Bombers on Midway, 1942; Ammunition Magazine on Midway); (7) "Putting It All Together: Activities" (Victory or Defeat?; Technology and Warfare; Remembering the Middle of Midway; Local War Memorials); and (8) "Supplementary Resources." (BT) AU - Hunter, Kathleen Y1 - 2002 PY - 2002 DA - 2002 SP - 36 PB - Teaching with Historic Places, National Register of Historic Places, National Park Service, 1849 C Street NW, Suite NC400, Washington, DC 20240. Tel: 202-208-6843. For full text: http://www.cr.nps.gov/nr/twhp/wwwlps/lessons/90midway/90midway.htm/. KW - National Historic Landmarks Program KW - National History Standards KW - ERIC, Resources in Education (RIE) KW - Teachers KW - Practitioners KW - Intermediate Grades KW - Heritage Education KW - Geographic Location KW - Social Studies KW - World War II KW - Secondary Education KW - Teaching Guides KW - Student Educational Objectives KW - Primary Sources KW - Curriculum Enrichment KW - Geography KW - United States History KW - Historic Sites UR - http://libproxy.lib.unc.edu/login?url=http://search.proquest.com/docview/62198983?accountid=14244 LA - English DB - ERIC N1 - Last updated - 2017-02-24 ER - TY - GEN T1 - The Siege of Port Hudson: "Forty Days and Nights in the Wilderness of Death." Revised. Teaching with Historic Places. AN - 62198880; ED471479 AB - This lesson describes and discusses the U.S. Civil War Siege of Port Hudson (Louisiana). Based on the National Register of Historic Places registration file, "Port Hudson Battlefield," the lesson cites objectives and lists materials for students, and provides information for a site visit. It contains eight sections: (1) "About this Lesson"; (2) "Getting Started: Inquiry Question"; (3)"Setting the Stage: Historical Context"; (4) "Locating the Site: Maps" (The Mississippi Valley; Port Hudson and Its Defenses); (5) "Determining the Facts: Readings" (The Setting for Siege; The Mule Diet at Port Hudson; The Account of Pvt. Henry T. Johns; The Letters of John William DeForest); (6) "Visual Evidence: Images" (Confederate Cannon inside Port Hudson; Confederate 'Rat Holes' within the Fort; Confederate Earthworks; Federal Siege Camp in a Ravine; Federal Artillery Battery; African-American Troops at Port Hudson); (7) "Putting It All Together: Activities" (The Life of a Soldier; The Hero; Debating Siege Warfare; Your Community Under Attack); and (8) "Supplementary Resources." (RJC) AU - Potts, Gregg AU - Bergeron, Arthur W. Y1 - 2002 PY - 2002 DA - 2002 SP - 39 PB - Teaching with Historic Places, National Register of Historic Places, National Park Service, 1849 C Street NW, Suite NC400, Washington, DC 20240. For full text: http://www.cr.nps.gov/nr/twhp/wwwlps/lessons/. KW - Military History KW - National Register of Historic Places KW - ERIC, Resources in Education (RIE) KW - Practitioners KW - Teachers KW - Heritage Education KW - War KW - Social Studies KW - Material Culture KW - History Instruction KW - Civil War (United States) KW - Primary Sources KW - United States History KW - Historic Sites KW - Middle Schools KW - Secondary Education UR - http://libproxy.lib.unc.edu/login?url=http://search.proquest.com/docview/62198880?accountid=14244 LA - English DB - ERIC N1 - Last updated - 2017-02-24 ER - TY - GEN T1 - The Battle of Mill Springs: The Civil War Divides a Border State. Revised. Teaching with Historic Places. AN - 62198691; ED471482 AB - This teaching guide provides a teaching unit that has been adapted from materials published as part of the National Register of Historic Places'"Teaching with Historic Places" lesson plan series. The lesson describes and discusses the U.S. Civil War Battle of Mill Springs (Kentucky). The lesson plan contains eight sections: (1) "About the Lesson"; (2) "Getting Started: Inquiry Question"; (3) "Setting the Stage: Historical Context"; (4) "Locating the Site: Maps" (Ohio River Valley, 1860; Kentucky and Surrounding Region); (5) "Determining the Facts: Readings" (Kentucky's Importance; Battle of Mill Springs; Remembering Those Who Died at Mill Springs); (6) "Visual Evidence: Images" (Death of General Zollicoffer; Mill Springs Battlefield Today; Zollie Tree; Mill Springs National Cemetery); (7) Putting It All Together: Activities" (Choosing Sides; Soldiers' View; Community Action); and (8) "Supplementary Resources." (RJC) AU - Turpen, William P. AU - Nicholas, Ronald Y1 - 2002 PY - 2002 DA - 2002 SP - 28 PB - Teaching with Historic Places, National Register of Historic Places, National Park Service, 1849 C Street NW, Suite NC400, Washington, DC 20240. For full text: http://www.cr.nps.gov/nr/twhp/wwwlps/lessons/. KW - Military History KW - National Register of Historic Places KW - ERIC, Resources in Education (RIE) KW - Practitioners KW - Teachers KW - Heritage Education KW - Social Studies KW - Material Culture KW - History Instruction KW - Civil War (United States) KW - Primary Sources KW - United States History KW - Historic Sites KW - Middle Schools KW - Secondary Education UR - http://libproxy.lib.unc.edu/login?url=http://search.proquest.com/docview/62198691?accountid=14244 LA - English DB - ERIC N1 - Last updated - 2017-02-24 ER - TY - GEN T1 - Carnegie Libraries: The Future Made Bright. Revised. Teaching with Historic Places. AN - 62198255; ED471480 AB - This lesson describes and discusses the impact on Carnegie Libraries in U.S. history. The lesson plan contains eight sections: (1) "About this Lesson"; (2) "Getting Started: Inquiry Question"; (3) "Setting the Stage: Historical Context"; (4) "Locating the Site: Maps" (Carnegie Libraries in the United States, 1920); (5) "Determining the Facts: Readings" (Andrew Carnegie; Applying for a Carnegie Library; Obtaining a Carnegie Library; Examples of Carnegie Libraries; Distribution of Carnegie Libraries, 1920); (6) "Visual Evidence: Images" (Sample Library Building Plans; Medford Free Public Library, Medford, Wisconsin; Carnegie Free Library, Connellsville, Pennsylvania; Richfield Public Library, Richfield, Utah; Carnegie Library, Spokane, Washington; Carnegie Library, Girard, Kansas;'Harpers Weekly,' March 30, 1901); (7) "Putting It All Together: Activities" (Additional Research on Carnegie; Famous Philanthropists; Spending a Fortune; Libraries in the Local Community); and (8) "Supplementary Resources." (RJC) AU - Copp, Roberta Y1 - 2002 PY - 2002 DA - 2002 SP - 41 PB - Teaching with Historic Places, National Register of Historic Places, National Park Service, 1849 C Street, NW, Suite NC400, Washington, DC 20240. For full text: http://www.cr.nps.gov/nr/twhp/wwwlps/lessons/. KW - Carnegie (Andrew) KW - National Register of Historic Places KW - ERIC, Resources in Education (RIE) KW - Practitioners KW - Teachers KW - Built Environment KW - Private Financial Support KW - Social Studies KW - Social History KW - Public Libraries KW - History Instruction KW - Elementary Secondary Education KW - Philanthropic Foundations KW - Primary Sources KW - United States History KW - Historic Sites UR - http://libproxy.lib.unc.edu/login?url=http://search.proquest.com/docview/62198255?accountid=14244 LA - English DB - ERIC N1 - Last updated - 2017-02-24 ER - TY - GEN T1 - Thurmond: A Town Born from Coal Mines and Railroads. Teaching with Historic Places. AN - 62198207; ED467869 AB - Deep in the rugged coal fields of West Virginia, the rumble of a steam locomotive mingles with the sound of the New River crashing through its steep rocky gorge. With brakes squealing, the train passes a signal and slows for its approach into the town of Thurmond (West Virginia). This lesson plan is based on the National Register of Historic Places file "Thurmond Historic District," and other source materials about railroading in the New River Gorge. The lesson, which can be used in units on transportation history and community development, helps students understand how important these transportation services were to an otherwise inaccessible region. It cites National History Standards for grades 5-12, objectives for students, and materials needed. The lesson is divided into eight sections: (1) "About This Lesson"; (2) "Getting Started: Inquiry Questions"; (3) "Setting the Stage: Historical Context"; (4) "Locating the Site: Maps" (Chesapeake and Ohio Railroad; Coal Mine Connection); (5) "Determining the Facts: Readings" (A Railroad Town; Behind the Scenes; A Ballad); (6) "Visual Evidence: Images" (Thurmond, c. 1920; Layout of Thurmond; Postcard Picture of Thurmond Depot; Ticket Office at a C&O Depot); (7) "Putting It All Together: Activities" (Role Play; Recognizing Others; Transportation Then and Now); and (8) "Supplementary Resources." (BT) AU - Doktorski, Cynthia Y1 - 2002 PY - 2002 DA - 2002 SP - 29 PB - Teaching with Historic Places, National Register of Historic Places, National Park Service, 1849 C Street NW, Suite NC400, Washington, DC 20240. Tel: 202-208-6843. For full text: http://www.cr.nps.gov/nr/twhp/wwwlps/lessons/28thurmond/28thurmond.htm/. KW - National History Standards KW - National Register of Historic Places KW - ERIC, Resources in Education (RIE) KW - Teachers KW - Practitioners KW - Intermediate Grades KW - Heritage Education KW - Rail Transportation KW - Social Studies KW - Coal KW - Secondary Education KW - Municipalities KW - Student Educational Objectives KW - Primary Sources KW - Curriculum Enrichment KW - United States History KW - Historic Sites UR - http://libproxy.lib.unc.edu/login?url=http://search.proquest.com/docview/62198207?accountid=14244 LA - English DB - ERIC N1 - Last updated - 2017-02-24 ER - TY - GEN T1 - Waterford, Virginia: From Mill Town to National Historic Landmark. Teaching with Historic Places. AN - 62198176; ED467871 AB - Waterford, Virginia, preserves the ambiance and many of the structures that characterized it during its heyday as a flour milling town in the 19th century. The village has changed so little in shape and size that founder Amos Janney would find it recognizable. He could stroll from his 1733 home to the area of his original mill and then on to the Quaker meeting house he founded in 1741. This lesson plan is based on the National Register of Historic Places file "Waterford Historic District" and materials in the collection of the Waterford Foundation. The lesson, which focuses on changing life in a Quaker agricultural community and mill town, can be used in U.S. history, social studies, and geography courses in a unit about early industrialization or to illustrate how communities adapt to economic change. It cites relevant National History Standards, objectives for students, and materials needed. The lesson is divided into eight sections: (1) "About This Lesson"; (2) "Getting Started: Inquiry Questions"; (3) "Setting the Stage: Historical Context"; (4) "Locating the Site: Maps" (Loudoun County, Virginia, 1870s; Waterford and Surrounding Farms, 1853); (5) "Determining the Facts: Readings" (Waterford: From Mill Town to National Historic Landmark; Early 19th Century Wheat Farming near Waterford; Waterford's Mill Ledger); (6) "Visual Evidence: Images" (Plan of Waterford, 1853; Mill and Miller's House, 1882; Mill and Miller's House Today; View down Main Street, c. 1862; View down Main Street Today; Quaker Meeting House); (7) "Putting It All Together: Activities" (Step Back in Time; Waterford, Then and Now; Change over Time in Your Town); and (8) "Supplementary Resources." (BT) AU - Souders, Bronwen Y1 - 2002 PY - 2002 DA - 2002 SP - 33 PB - Teaching with Historic Places, National Register of Historic Places, National Park Service, 1849 C Street NW, Suite NC400, Washington, DC 20240. Tel: 202-208-6843. For full text: http://www.cr.nps.gov/nr/twhp/wwwlps/lessons/88waterford/88waterford.htm/. KW - National Register of Historic Places KW - Historical Preservation KW - National History Standards KW - ERIC, Resources in Education (RIE) KW - Teachers KW - Practitioners KW - Intermediate Grades KW - Heritage Education KW - Geographic Location KW - Built Environment KW - Social Studies KW - Community Change KW - Secondary Education KW - Municipalities KW - Local History KW - Student Educational Objectives KW - Primary Sources KW - Curriculum Enrichment KW - Geography KW - Historic Sites UR - http://libproxy.lib.unc.edu/login?url=http://search.proquest.com/docview/62198176?accountid=14244 LA - English DB - ERIC N1 - Last updated - 2017-02-24 ER - TY - GEN T1 - The War Relocation Camps of World War II: When Fear Was Stronger Than Justice. Teaching with Historic Places. AN - 62198139; ED467868 AB - In spite of facing continual discrimination, Japanese and Japanese Americans living on the U.S. west coast made lives for themselves. On December 7, 1941, everything changed. After the attack on Pearl Harbor (Hawaii), individuals saw every Japanese or Japanese American as a potential spy, ready and willing to assist in a mainland invasion at any moment. In February 1942, President Franklin Roosevelt signed an executive order that moved nearly 120,000 Japanese and Japanese Americans into 10 isolated relocation centers in Arizona, Arkansas, California, Colorado, Idaho, Utah, and Wyoming. This lesson is based on the National Register of Historic Places files "Manzanar War Relocation Center" and "Rowher Relocation Center Memorial Cemetery," and other related materials. The lesson can be used in an U.S. history unit about World War II or in a social studies unit about human rights. It cites National History Standards, objectives for students, and materials needed. The lesson is divided into eight sections: (1) "About This Lesson"; (2) "Getting Started: Inquiry Questions"; (3) "Setting the Stage: Historical Context"; (4) "Locating the Site: Maps" (South Pacific in 1942; War Relocation Centers in the U.S.); (5) "Determining the Facts: Readings" (Fear!; "To All Persons of Japanese Ancestry...; Life in Relocation Centers); (6) "Visual Evidence: Images" (Residential Block Layouts; Evacuees Arriving, Manzanar, 1942; Residential Block, Rowher, 1943; Typical Barracks Room, Manzanar, 1942; Mess Hall, Manzanar, 1942; Remains of Security Fence, Manzanar; Manzanar with Mt. Williamson in Background, 1942; Monument to the Men of the 100th Battalion/442nd Combat Team, Rowher Memorial); (7) "Putting It All Together: Activities" (Rights of Citizens; Being There; Reactions; Lest We Forget); and (8) "Supplementary Resources." (BT) AU - Hunter, Kathleen Y1 - 2002 PY - 2002 DA - 2002 SP - 41 PB - Teaching with Historic Places, National Register of Historic Places, National Park Service, 1849 C Street NW, Suite NC400, Washington, DC 20240. Tel: 202-208-6843. For full text: http://www.cr.nps.gov/nr/twhp/wwwlps/lessons/89manzanar/89manzanar.htm/. KW - National Register of Historic Places KW - Japanese Relocation Camps KW - National History Standards KW - ERIC, Resources in Education (RIE) KW - Teachers KW - Practitioners KW - Intermediate Grades KW - Heritage Education KW - Civil Liberties KW - Social Studies KW - World War II KW - Secondary Education KW - Japanese Americans KW - Relocation KW - Student Educational Objectives KW - Primary Sources KW - Curriculum Enrichment KW - United States History KW - Historic Sites UR - http://libproxy.lib.unc.edu/login?url=http://search.proquest.com/docview/62198139?accountid=14244 LA - English DB - ERIC N1 - Last updated - 2017-02-24 ER - TY - GEN T1 - The Joseph Bellamy House: Great Awakening in Puritan New England. Teaching with Historic Places. AN - 62197973; ED467875 AB - The small rural town of Bethlehem, Connecticut, contains pristine examples of modest 18th-century houses that surround a charming village green. Opposite the village green, the Reverend Joseph Bellamy's immense white clapboard house rises from a hilltop, an imposing presence that makes the village appear diminutive. The house stands today as a reminder of Bellamy's role as a leading preacher, author, and educator in New England from 1740 to 1790 and of the great awakening in Puritan New England. This lesson plan, based on the National Register of Historic Places file, "Joseph Bellamy House," and other sources on the Great Awakening and Joseph Bellamy, can be used in U.S. history, social studies, and geography courses in units on religion in the colonies. The lesson helps students gain a deeper understanding of the great awakening and the role Puritan ministers played in 18th-century New England. It cites U.S. history standards and lists educational objectives and materials needed. The lesson is divided into eight sections: (1) "About This Lesson"; (2) "Getting Started: Inquiry Question"; (3) "Setting the Stage: Historical Context"; (4) "Locating the Site: Maps" (Colonial Connecticut; Original Lost for Sale in North Purchase); (5) "Determining the Facts: Readings" (Great Awakening; Joseph Bellamy; Insight into Joseph Bellamy); (6) "Visual Evidence: Images" (View of the Center of Bethlehem, 1836; Conjectured Floor Plan of the Bellamy House; Modern Floor Plan of the Bellamy-Ferriday House; Bellamy-Ferriday House; Reverend Joseph's Pulpit; Old Cemetery); (7) "Putting It All Together: Activities" (Letter Writing; Gravestone Design; Historical Research in the Community); and (8) "Supplementary Resources." (BT) AU - Pape, Barbara Bradbury Y1 - 2002 PY - 2002 DA - 2002 SP - 34 PB - Teaching with Historic Places, National Register of Historic Places, National Park Service, 1849 C Street NW, Ste. NC400, Washington, DC 20240. For full text: http://www.cr.nps.gov/nr/twhp/wwwlps/lessons/85bellamy/85bellamy.htm/. KW - Site Visits KW - Connecticut KW - National History Standards KW - National Register of Historic Places KW - Puritanism KW - ERIC, Resources in Education (RIE) KW - Teachers KW - Practitioners KW - Intermediate Grades KW - Heritage Education KW - Colonial History (United States) KW - Built Environment KW - Social Studies KW - Secondary Education KW - Religious Cultural Groups KW - Student Educational Objectives KW - Religion Studies KW - Primary Sources KW - Curriculum Enrichment KW - State History KW - Historic Sites UR - http://libproxy.lib.unc.edu/login?url=http://search.proquest.com/docview/62197973?accountid=14244 LA - English DB - ERIC N1 - Last updated - 2017-02-24 ER - TY - GEN T1 - The Hispano Ranchos of Northern New Mexico: Continuity and Change. Teaching with Historic Places. AN - 62197930; ED469756 AB - Northern New Mexico boasts river valleys surrounded by snow covered mountains. But it is also harsh and unforgiving. One settler called it a "glorious hell." The "Hispanos," as the early Spanish settlers and their descendants were called, and the "Anglos," the immigrants from the east, were often in conflict. The physical fabric of their early ranchos, which combines the traditions of both cultural groups, testifies to the Hispanos' age-old heritage and to their ability to adapt to change. Some of the small subsistence farms (ranchos), created in the mid-19th century, survive in the mountain valleys of the Pecos and Mora rivers. This lesson plan is based on the Valencia Ranch Historic/Archeological District, the La Cueva Historic District, and other sources. The lesson plan can be used in U.S. history, social studies, and geography courses in units on settlement of the West or New Mexico history, and in units on cultural diversity. It is divided into eight sections: (1) "About This Lesson"; (2) "Getting Started: Inquiry Question"; (3) "Setting the Stage: Historical Context"; (4) "Locating the Site: Maps" (Northern Provinces of New Spain; Spanish Settlement in New Mexico, 1769); (5) "Determining the Facts: Readings" (Hispanos and Anglos; Continuity and Change in the Valleys; Valencia and La Cueva Ranchos); (6) Visual Evidence: Images" (Traditional Hispano House; Plan of a Traditional House; Main House, Valencia Rancho; Romero House, La Cueva Rancho; Valencia Rancho; Aerial View of the Valencia Rancho); (7) "Putting It All Together: Activities" (Comparing Early Building Techniques; Traditional Building and Cultural Identity; Continuity and Change in the Community); and (8) "Supplementary Resources." (BT) AU - Koman, Rita G. Y1 - 2002 PY - 2002 DA - 2002 SP - 32 PB - Teaching with Historic Places, National Register of Historic Places, National Park Service, 1849 C Street NW, Suite NC400, Washington, DC 20240. Tel: 202-208-6843. For full text: http://www.cr.nps.gov/nr/twhp/wwwlps/lessons/96ranchos/96ranchos.htm. KW - National History Standards KW - National Register of Historic Places KW - New Mexico KW - Westward Movement (United States) KW - ERIC, Resources in Education (RIE) KW - Practitioners KW - Teachers KW - Heritage Education KW - Cultural Pluralism KW - Land Settlement KW - Built Environment KW - Student Research KW - Social Studies KW - Student Educational Objectives KW - Primary Sources KW - State History KW - Historic Sites KW - Secondary Education UR - http://libproxy.lib.unc.edu/login?url=http://search.proquest.com/docview/62197930?accountid=14244 LA - English DB - ERIC N1 - Last updated - 2017-02-24 ER - TY - GEN T1 - Clash of the Titans: Booker T. Washington and W. E. B. Du Bois. Curriculum Based Education Program, Grade 11. AN - 62197481; ED467297 AB - The Booker T. Washington National Monument preserves and protects the birth site and childhood home of Booker T. Washington while interpreting his life experiences and significance in U.S. history as the most powerful African American between 1895 and 1915. The programs and activities included in this guide about the Booker T. Washington and W. E. B Du Bois are designed to meet the curriculum requirements specified in the Standards of Learning for Virginia Public Schools. This curriculum unit for 11th grade compares and contrasts Washington and Du Bois, two prominent African American leaders who had opposing views on many topics. The guide explores the impact these two men had on the modern civil rights movement in the United States. Engaging in the unit's pre-visit, on-site, and post-visit activities, students focus on the differing ideas about civil rights held by Du Bois and Washington. The activities in the unit enable students to investigate, research, and participate in hands-on learning experiences. Each program content page details how the park can serve as a classroom. The unit describes activities and gives specific objectives for each lesson. (Contains a 13-item booklist and informational materials.) (BT) Y1 - 2002 PY - 2002 DA - 2002 SP - 36 PB - Booker T. Washington National Monument, 12130 Booker T. Washington Highway, Hardy, VA 24101. Tel: 540-721-2094; Fax: 540-721-8311; e-mail: BOWA_Rangers_3@nps.gov. For full text: http://www.nps.gov/bowa/pdffiles/ClashoftheTitans.pdf/. KW - Site Visits KW - Virginia Standards of Learning Program KW - Washington (Booker T) KW - Du Bois (W E B) KW - ERIC, Resources in Education (RIE) KW - Practitioners KW - Teachers KW - Heritage Education KW - Black Achievement KW - Grade 11 KW - Blacks KW - Black Leadership KW - Social Studies KW - Black History KW - High Schools KW - Student Research KW - Student Educational Objectives KW - Primary Sources KW - Curriculum Enrichment KW - United States History KW - Historic Sites KW - State Standards UR - http://libproxy.lib.unc.edu/login?url=http://search.proquest.com/docview/62197481?accountid=14244 LA - English DB - ERIC N1 - Last updated - 2017-02-24 ER - TY - RPRT T1 - Building Exemplary Schools for Tomorrow. Fingertip Facts, 2002. AN - 62197108; ED470954 AB - This booklet provides concise information about the schools, colleges and universities, and other educational programs and activities of the Bureau of Indian Affairs (BIA), Office of Indian Education Programs (OIEP). During the 2001-02 school year, OIEP directly served 48,166 K-12 students in 185 schools operated by the BIA or by tribes with BIA funding and indirectly served over 400,000 students through various educational programs. The 26 BIA-funded tribally controlled colleges and the 2 BIA-operated postsecondary institutions enrolled approximately 31,600 students. The Family and Child Education (FACE) program, which serves Indian families with children aged 0-3, expanded from 22 to 32 schools. There are approximately 2,115 educational facilities maintained by the BIA and employing approximately 4,800 teachers, administrators, and other personnel. This booklet provides an overview of OIEP, its mission, U.S. government-tribal relations, and BIA students and schools. A report card presents 2001 educational indicators for BIA schools. Contact information is provided for education line officers, Center for School Improvement education specialists, OIEP School Reform field education specialists, special education coordinators, and tribally controlled colleges. The booklet describes the American Indian Education Foundation, other programs supportive of Indian education, sections of federal legislation relevant to BIA schools, BIA responsibilities, major special education activities of the BIA, federal programs serving eligible Indian students, higher education scholarships and grants for Indian students, and BIA branches and programs. (SV) Y1 - 2002 PY - 2002 DA - 2002 SP - 26 KW - Bureau of Indian Affairs Schools KW - Office of Indian Education Programs KW - ERIC, Resources in Education (RIE) KW - Program Descriptions KW - Tribally Controlled Education KW - Public Agencies KW - Federal Aid KW - Preschool Education KW - Federal Programs KW - Elementary Secondary Education KW - Higher Education KW - American Indian Education KW - Administrative Organization UR - http://libproxy.lib.unc.edu/login?url=http://search.proquest.com/docview/62197108?accountid=14244 LA - English DB - ERIC N1 - Last updated - 2017-02-24 ER - TY - GEN T1 - Paleontology. A Curriculum and Activity Guide to Mammoth Cave National Park. [Grades] 1-12. AN - 62197042; ED468213 AB - Mammoth Cave (Kentucky) was designated as a national park in 1941 because of its beautiful hills and valleys, scenic rivers, and the vast cave system located within its boundaries. Outstanding physiographic features include karst terrains, sandstone capped plateaus, and bluffs overlooking rivers and streams, which provide an unusually wide variety of ecological elements. The Park is part of what is believed to be the most diverse cave ecosystem in the world. This curriculum and activity guide for paleontological study (an examination of the remains of living things) in Mammoth Cave National Park provides information about the National Park Service. The unit is divided into the four parts: (1) "Our Geological Past" (Kitchen Geology, grades 4-6; Weathering and Erosion, grades 4-6; Paleo Time Line, grades 6-12; Time Lapse, grades 6-12); (2) "Fossilization" (Create a Fossil, grades 1-4; Tales of the Dead, grades 6-12; How Do You Become a Fossil? grades 1-6; Crinoid Race, grades 6-9; Fossil Identification, grades 6-12); (3) "Adaptations" (Race for Survival, grades 1-8; Survival of the Fittest, grades 6-12); and (4) "Human Influences" (Shoe Box Midden Dig, grades 6-12; Fossil Search, grades 4-9; Exploring the Past: A Field Trip into Mammoth Cave, grades 6-12). Contains a glossary. (BT) Y1 - 2002 PY - 2002 DA - 2002 SP - 96 PB - Mammoth Cave National Park, P.O. Box 7, Mammoth Cave, KY 42259. Tel: 270-758-2251; Fax: 270-773-2111; e-mail: MACA_Park_Information@nps.gov. For full text: http://www.nps.gov/maca/learnhome/curricula.htm/. KW - Kentucky KW - Site Visits KW - ERIC, Resources in Education (RIE) KW - Teachers KW - Practitioners KW - Heritage Education KW - Ecology KW - Natural Resources KW - Physical Geography KW - Physical Environment KW - Environmental Education KW - Social Studies KW - Elementary Secondary Education KW - Student Educational Objectives KW - Primary Sources KW - Paleontology UR - http://libproxy.lib.unc.edu/login?url=http://search.proquest.com/docview/62197042?accountid=14244 LA - English DB - ERIC N1 - Last updated - 2017-02-24 ER - TY - GEN T1 - Going-to-the-Sun Road: A Model of Landscape Engineering. Teaching with Historic Places. AN - 62196548; ED475083 AB - Soaring mountain peaks, glaciers, deep-blue lakes, and lush forests delight the senses of visitors who drive on Going-to-the-Sun Road through Glacier National Park in northwestern Montana. The construction of the Going-to-the-Sun-Road, dedicated in 1933, made this experience available to the many visitors who come to the park by car. Building this transmountain road, literally carved out of the precipitous mountainside for 12 of its 50-mile length, was a challenging and dangerous task. Its designers and builders learned valuable lessons that were applied to many such scenic roads to follow. This lesson is based on National Historic Landmark documentation, National Register of Historic Places, and other sources. The lesson may be used in U.S. history, social studies, and geography courses in units on conservation and the environment or the influence of the automobile on popular culture. It is divided into eight sections: (1) "About This Lesson"; (2) "Getting Started: Inquiry Question"; (3) "Setting the Stage: Historical Context"; (4) "Locating the Site: Maps" (Montana; Glacier National Park); (5) "Determining the Facts: Readings" (Surveying Going-to-the-Sun Road; Building Going-to-the-Sun Road; Preserving the Landscape); (6) "Visual Evidence: Images" (Going-to-the-Sun Road; Area near Logan Pass; Building the Granite Creek Retaining Wall; Triple Arches; Construction Equipment; View of the Garden Wall; Going-to-the-Sun Road); (7) "Putting It All Together: Activities" (Use a Park or Preserve It?; Working in a Park; Investigating the Local Community); and (8)"Supplementary Resources." (BT) AU - Metcalf, Fay Y1 - 2002 PY - 2002 DA - 2002 SP - 37 PB - Teaching with Historic Places, National Register of Historic Places, National Park Service, 1849 C Street, NW, Suite NC400, Washington, DC 20240. Tel: 202-208-6843; e-mail: cwss_comments@nps.gov. For full text: http://www.cr.nps.gov/nr/twhp/wwwlps/lessons/95sunroad/95sunroad.htm. KW - Montana KW - National History Standards KW - National Register of Historic Places KW - ERIC, Resources in Education (RIE) KW - Practitioners KW - Teachers KW - Social Studies KW - Student Educational Objectives KW - Interdisciplinary Approach KW - Curriculum Enrichment KW - State History KW - Road Construction KW - Geography KW - United States History KW - Historic Sites KW - Secondary Education UR - http://libproxy.lib.unc.edu/login?url=http://search.proquest.com/docview/62196548?accountid=14244 LA - English DB - ERIC N1 - Last updated - 2017-02-24 ER - TY - GEN T1 - Hopewell Furnace: A Pennsylvania Iron-Making Plantation. Teaching with Historic Places. AN - 62196468; ED469755 AB - The rhythmic noises of the turning water wheel and the roar of the furnace blast never stopped at Hopewell Furnace (Pennsylvania) during its years of operation (1771-1883). As long as the furnace was in blast, the ironworkers' jobs were safe. In case of trouble, they could escape to the woods, fields, and creeks of rural Pennsylvania. Now a national historic site, Hopewell Furnace lies in a setting of forested hills and valleys along a French Creek in Berks County in southeastern Pennsylvania. It provides a glimpse into the early days of the iron and steel industry that played a central role in the growth of the United States as an industrial nation. This lesson plan on Hopewell Furnace can be used in U.S. history, social studies, and geography courses in units on the growth of the U.S. economy during the early national period. The lesson plan is divided into eight sections: (1) "About This Lesson"; (2) "Getting Started: Inquiry Question"; (3) "Setting the Stage: Historical Context"; (4) "Locating the Site: Maps" (Pennsylvania and Surrounding Areas; Southeastern Pennsylvania); (5) "Determining the Facts: Readings" (Works at Hopewell Furnace; Owner and Iron Master; Hopewell Furnace Community); (6) "Visual Evidence: Images" (19th Century Blast Furnace in Operation; 'Jumping the Pit,' 1936; Artist's View of Hopewell Furnace, 1950s; Ironmaster's House with Outbuildings; Tenant Houses; Typical Hopewell Furnace Products); (7) "Putting It All Together: Activities" (Working at Hopewell; Economic History in the Local Community); and (8) "Supplementary Resources." (BT) AU - Koman, Rita G. Y1 - 2002 PY - 2002 DA - 2002 SP - 34 PB - Hopewell Furnace National Historic Site, 2 Mark Bird Lane, Elverson, PA 19520. Tel: 610-582-8773; Fax: 610-582-2768; e-mail: HOFU_Superintendent@nps.gov. For full text: http://www.cr.nps.gov/nr/twhp/wwwlps/lessons/97hopewell/97hopewell.htm. KW - Pennsylvania KW - National History Standards KW - National Register of Historic Places KW - ERIC, Resources in Education (RIE) KW - Teachers KW - Practitioners KW - Intermediate Grades KW - Heritage Education KW - Built Environment KW - Industrialization KW - Social Studies KW - Student Educational Objectives KW - Primary Sources KW - United States History KW - Historic Sites KW - Secondary Education UR - http://libproxy.lib.unc.edu/login?url=http://search.proquest.com/docview/62196468?accountid=14244 LA - English DB - ERIC N1 - Last updated - 2017-02-24 ER - TY - GEN T1 - Chesterwood: The Workshop of an American Sculptor. Teaching with Historic Places. AN - 62196381; ED471477 AB - The late 19th- and early 20th-century sculptor, Daniel Chester French, spent 34 summers working daily at Chesterwood (Stockbridge, Massachusetts), his summer studio and home. The workplace was designed specifically for creating monumental public structures, works such as the "Abraham Lincoln" that forms the centerpiece of the Lincoln Memorial in Washington, DC. But beyond the open door of his studio, French could admire a panoramic view of the rolling Berkshire Hills. This lesson is based on the Daniel Chester French Home and Studio file. The lesson can be used in U.S. history, social studies, and geography courses in units on late 19th and early 20th century reform and urban movements or in an introduction to U.S. art history. It contains eight sections: (1) "About This Lesson"; (2) "Getting Started: Inquiry Question"; (3) "Setting the Stage: Historical Context"; (4) "Locating the Site: Maps" (Stockbridge and Surrounding Area); (5) "Determining the Facts: Readings" (The Sculptor: Daniel Chester French; Chesterwood: Home and Workplace; Working on the 'Abraham Lincoln' for the Lincoln Memorial); (6) "Visual Evidence: Images" (Bird's-eye View of Chesterwood; French's Studio at Chesterwood; Main House at Chesterwood; Interior of the Workroom Today; Sculpture on Railroad Track, 1905; 'Minute Man'; 'Abraham Lincoln' Being Installed at the Lincoln Memorial, 1922; Sketch Model of 'Abraham Lincoln'; Working Model of 'Abraham Lincoln'; Detail, 'Abraham Lincoln,' Washington, DC); (7) "Putting It All Together: Activities" (Reading a Sculpture; Sculpture as Work; Public Art in the Community); and (8) "Supplementary Resources." (BT) AU - Koman, Rita Y1 - 2002 PY - 2002 DA - 2002 SP - 40 PB - Teaching with Historic Places, National Register of Historic Places, National Park Service, 1849 C Street, NW, Suite NC400, Washington, DC 20240. For full text: http://www.cr.nps.gov/nr/twhp/wwwlps/lessons/. KW - National Register of Historic Places KW - French (Daniel Chester) KW - ERIC, Resources in Education (RIE) KW - Practitioners KW - Teachers KW - Heritage Education KW - Artists KW - Built Environment KW - Sculpture KW - Social Studies KW - Student Educational Objectives KW - Primary Sources KW - Curriculum Enrichment KW - United States History KW - Historic Sites KW - Secondary Education UR - http://libproxy.lib.unc.edu/login?url=http://search.proquest.com/docview/62196381?accountid=14244 LA - English DB - ERIC N1 - Last updated - 2017-02-24 ER - TY - GEN T1 - The Battle of Bunker Hill: Now We Are at War. Revised. Teaching with Historic Places. AN - 62196326; ED471481 AB - This lesson describes and discusses the Battle of Bunker Hill (Massachusetts), which took place during the Revolutionary War. The lesson plan contains eight sections: (1) "About this Lesson"; (2) "Getting Started: Inquiry Question"; (3) "Setting the Stage: Historical Context"; (4) "Locating the Site: Maps" (Boston Area Today; Boston Area, 1776); (5) "Determining the Facts: Readings" (Setting the Stage for Battle; Battle of Bunker Hill); (6) "Visual Evidence: Images" (Charlestown Peninsula; Battle of Bunker Hill; Redoubt Atop Breed's Hill); (7) Putting It All Together: Activities" (Rebellion--Then and Now; Community Issues); and "Supplementary Resources." (RJC) AU - Brue, Sandy Y1 - 2002 PY - 2002 DA - 2002 SP - 29 PB - Teaching with Historic Places, National Register of Historic Places, National Park Service, 1849 C Street NW, Suite NC400, Washington, DC 20240. For full text: http://www.cr.nps.gov/nr/twhp/wwwlps/lessons/. KW - Military History KW - National Register of Historic Places KW - Massachusetts KW - ERIC, Resources in Education (RIE) KW - Practitioners KW - Teachers KW - Map Skills KW - Colonial History (United States) KW - War KW - Social Studies KW - History Instruction KW - Revolutionary War (United States) KW - Primary Sources KW - Geography KW - United States History KW - Middle Schools KW - Secondary Education UR - http://libproxy.lib.unc.edu/login?url=http://search.proquest.com/docview/62196326?accountid=14244 LA - English DB - ERIC N1 - Last updated - 2017-02-24 ER - TY - GEN T1 - To Be a Slave: The Boyhood of Booker T. Washington. AN - 62195304; ED467295 AB - The Booker T. Washington National Monument preserves and protects the birth site and childhood home of Booker T. Washington, while interpreting his life experiences and significance in U.S. history as the most powerful African American between 1895 and 1915. The park provides a resource for public education and a focal point for continuing discussions about the legacies of Booker T. Washington and the evolving context of race in U.S. society. It is the mission of Booker T. Washington National Monument's education program to satisfy the curriculum needs specified in the Standards of Learning for Virginia Public Schools by utilizing the park as a classroom. Through engaging in pre-visit, on-site, and post-visit activities, students in grades K-1 focus on learning concepts appropriate to their grade level while being introduced to Booker T. Washington and his life as a slave. The activities enable students to investigate, research, and participate in hands-on learning experiences. During the site visit students learn about the cultural diversity that makes up Franklin County (Virginia). By learning about the past and the life of Booker T. Washington, individuals can understand the context of race in U.S. society better. Each program content page details how the national monument can serve as a classroom. The guide describes unit activities and gives specific objectives for each lesson. (Contains a 7-item monument booklist, a 14-item children's booklist, a 7-item adult booklist, and additional informational materials.) (BT) Y1 - 2002 PY - 2002 DA - 2002 SP - 32 PB - Booker T. Washington National Monument, 12130 Booker T. Washington Highway, Hardy, VA 24101. Tel: 540-721-2094; Fax: 540-721-8311; e-mail: BOWA_Rangers_3@nps.gov. For full text: http://www.nps.gov/bowa/pdffiles/ToBeASlave.pdf/. KW - Washington (Booker T) KW - Site Visits KW - Virginia Standards of Learning Program KW - ERIC, Resources in Education (RIE) KW - Practitioners KW - Teachers KW - Heritage Education KW - Black Achievement KW - Primary Education KW - Blacks KW - Social Studies KW - Black History KW - National Parks KW - Student Research KW - Student Educational Objectives KW - Primary Sources KW - Curriculum Enrichment KW - United States History KW - Historic Sites KW - State Standards UR - http://libproxy.lib.unc.edu/login?url=http://search.proquest.com/docview/62195304?accountid=14244 LA - English DB - ERIC N1 - Last updated - 2017-02-24 ER - TY - GEN T1 - War on the Home Front: Hardships on the Burroughs Plantation. AN - 62194851; ED467296 AB - The Booker T. Washington National Monument preserves and protects the birth site and childhood home of Booker T. Washington while interpreting his life experiences and significance in U.S. history as the most powerful African American between 1895 and 1915. The programs and activities included in this guide about the Burroughs Plantation (Virginia) are designed to meet the curriculum requirements specified in the Standards of Learning for Virginia Public Schools. This unit for students in grades 4-5 contains activities to introduce students to the impact of the Civil War, especially as it affected those living on the Burroughs Plantation. Engaging in the pre-visit, on-site, and post-site visit activities in the guide, students focus on learning concepts appropriate to their grade level while developing an appreciation for the problems and hardships of rural Virginia plantation life over a century ago. The activities enable students to investigate, research, and participate in hands-on learning experiences. Each program content page in the guide details how the park and its sites can serve as a classroom. The guide describes unit activities and gives specific objectives for each lesson. (Contains a 14-item children's booklist, a 7-item adult booklist, and other informational material.) (BT) Y1 - 2002 PY - 2002 DA - 2002 SP - 30 PB - Booker T. Washington National Monument, 12130 Booker T. Washington Highway, Hardy, VA 24101. Tel: 540-721-2094; Fax: 540-721-8311; e-mail: BOWA_Rangers_3@nps.gov. For full text: http://www.nps.gov/bowa/pdffiles/WarontheHomeFront.pdf/. KW - Site Visits KW - Virginia Standards of Learning Program KW - Washington (Booker T) KW - ERIC, Resources in Education (RIE) KW - Practitioners KW - Teachers KW - Intermediate Grades KW - Heritage Education KW - Black Achievement KW - Blacks KW - Social Studies KW - Student Research KW - Civil War (United States) KW - Student Educational Objectives KW - Primary Sources KW - Curriculum Enrichment KW - United States History KW - Historic Sites KW - State Standards UR - http://libproxy.lib.unc.edu/login?url=http://search.proquest.com/docview/62194851?accountid=14244 LA - English DB - ERIC N1 - Last updated - 2017-02-24 ER - TY - GEN T1 - Thomas Jefferson's Plan for the University of Virginia: Lessons from the Lawn. Teaching with Historic Places. AN - 62193121; ED467471 AB - This lesson is based on the National Register of Historic Places registration file, "University of Virginia Historic District," and other primary and secondary materials about Thomas Jefferson and the ctreation of the University of Virginia. Thomas Jefferson did not begin the effort of designing the University of Virginia (Charlottesville) until late in his life. The education of the common man had occupied his thoughts for decades. Jefferson imagined that an academic village clustered around a tree-lined lawn would provide an ideal setting in which to pursue higher education. When the Virginia legislature authorized a state university in 1818, the retired U.S. President finally was able to dedicate his intellect, time, and energy to creating this new kind of educational institution. By the time he finished with his design, Jefferson had invented a uniquely American setting for higher education, the college campus. This lesson plan contains eight sections: (1) "About This Lesson"; (2) "Getting Started: Inquiry Question"; (3) "Setting the Stage: Historical Context"; (4) "Locating the Site: Maps" (Virginia and Washington, DC; Charlottesville area, 1877); (5) "Determining the Facts: Readings" (Education as the Keystone to the New Democracy; Building the Academical Village; Jefferson's Philosophy of Education); (6) "Visual Evidence: Images" (College of New Jersey, Princeton, 1764; University of Virginia, 1826; Plan of the University of Virginia, 1825; Study for Anatomical Theatre, c. 1825; Students on the Lawn, 19th Century; Aerial View of the Lawn, 1997); (7) "Putting It All Together: Activities" (Village for Learning; Local Schools; Education through the Generations); and (8) "Supplementary Resources." (BT) AU - Hughes, Mary AU - Wilson, Sara Y1 - 2002 PY - 2002 DA - 2002 SP - 37 PB - Teaching with Historic Places, National Register of Historic Places, National Park Service, 1849 C Street, NW, Suite NC400, Washington, DC 20240. For full text: http://www.cr.nps.gov/nr/twhp/wwwlps/lessons/92uva/92uva.htm. KW - Jefferson (Thomas) KW - National Register of Historic Places KW - Site Visits KW - University of Virginia KW - ERIC, Resources in Education (RIE) KW - Practitioners KW - Teachers KW - Intermediate Grades KW - Heritage Education KW - Presidents of the United States KW - Built Environment KW - Social Studies KW - Higher Education KW - Secondary Education KW - Student Research KW - Student Educational Objectives KW - Primary Sources KW - United States History KW - Historic Sites UR - http://libproxy.lib.unc.edu/login?url=http://search.proquest.com/docview/62193121?accountid=14244 LA - English DB - ERIC N1 - Last updated - 2017-02-24 ER - TY - GEN T1 - Mount Auburn Cemetery: A New American Landscape. Teaching with Historic Places. AN - 62192953; ED466433 AB - Land was at a premium during the first quarter of the 19th century in the newly incorporated city of Boston (Massachusetts). Among the first priorities was the development of a safer, healthier city. Boston's burial grounds were seriously overcrowded, and additional space was no longer available within the city limits. Attitudes about death and burial were changing significantly around this time. Mount Auburn Cemetery, founded in 1831, reflected these changing ideas about death, and at the same time addressed the problem of an overcrowded city. Located about four miles outside of Boston, Mount Auburn Cemetery provided ample space for burials amid a tranquil, natural setting. This lesson plan looks at cemeteries and attitudes toward death and burial. The lesson plan is divided into eight sections: (1) "About This Lesson"; (2) "Getting Started: Inquiry Question"; (3) "Setting the Stage: Historical Context"; (4) "Locating the Site: Maps" (Boston and Vicinity, 1830; Mount Auburn Cemetery, 1847); (5) "Determining the Facts: Readings" (Founding Vision: A 'Garden of Graves'; The Landscape: Art and Nature; A Place for the Living: Leisure, Learning and Mourning); (6) "Visual Evidence: Images" (Engraved Views of Copp's Hill, Boston, 1851; Engraved View of Lowell Lot, 1847; Engraved View of Stow Gardens, circa 1760; Engraved View of Gossler Lot, 1847; Stereographic View of Jones Lot, 1860s; Engraved View of Appleton Lot, 1847; Mount Auburn Guide Book, 1856); (7) "Putting It All Together: Activities" (Map Mania; Location Is Everything; Observing the Landscape); and (8)"Supplementary Resources". The lesson plan can be used in U.S. history, social studies, and geography courses in units on urbanization and reform movements. (BT) AU - Heywood, Janet AU - Breitkreutz, Cathleen Lambert Y1 - 2002 PY - 2002 DA - 2002 SP - 35 PB - Teaching with Historic Places, National Register of Historic Places, National Park Service, 1849 C Street, NW, Suite NC400, Washington, DC 20240. For full text: http://www.cr.nps.gov/nr/twhp/wwwlps/lessons/84mountauburn/84mountauburn.htm. KW - National History Standards KW - National Register of Historic Places KW - Nineteenth Century KW - Cemeteries KW - ERIC, Resources in Education (RIE) KW - Teachers KW - Practitioners KW - Intermediate Grades KW - Heritage Education KW - Death KW - Urbanization KW - Built Environment KW - Social Studies KW - Secondary Education KW - Local History KW - History Instruction KW - Student Educational Objectives KW - United States History KW - Historic Sites KW - Bereavement UR - http://libproxy.lib.unc.edu/login?url=http://search.proquest.com/docview/62192953?accountid=14244 LA - English DB - ERIC N1 - Last updated - 2017-02-24 ER - TY - GEN T1 - The Battle of Glorieta Pass: A Shattered Dream. Teaching with Historic Places. AN - 62191489; ED466432 AB - Henry Hopkins Sibley shared his nation's destiny of spanning the American continent from the Atlantic to the Pacific. Sibley's nation was the Confederate States of America, and Confederate President Jefferson Davis shared Sibley's vision of southern manifest destiny. President Davis authorized Sibley to raise volunteers for the Confederate Army of New Mexico, since Sibley's object was to conquer New Mexico and go on to Colorado and California. But the Confederate troops encountered major obstacles they had not foreseen, including cold weather and dry landscape, a distrustful Hispanic population, Apache warriors, and a determined, quickly assembled Union volunteer force. In Glorieta Pass (New Mexico), on March 28, 1862, the dream of a Confederate Western Empire ended. This lesson plan contains eight sections: (1) "About This Lesson"; (2) "Getting Started: Inquiry Question"; (3) "Setting the Stage: Historical Context"; (4) "Locating the Site: Maps" (Southwest United States in 1862); (5) "Determining the Facts: Readings" (Gettysburg of the West; A Soldier's Experience; Reports of the Battle of Glorieta Pass); (6) "Visual Evidence: Images" (Battles of Apache Canyon and Glorieta Pass; Fight at Pigeon's Ranch; Pigeon's Ranch, 1880; Glorieta Pass Battlefield Today); (7) "Putting It All Together: Activities" (Consider Life as a Soldier; Impact of the Confederate Invasion; War Memorials in the Local Community); and (8) "Supplementary Resources." The lesson can be used in U.S. history, social studies, and geography courses in units on westward expansion and the U.S. Civil War. (BT) AU - McBride, James AU - Reed, Judy Y1 - 2002 PY - 2002 DA - 2002 SP - 34 PB - Teaching with Historic Places, National Register of Historic Places, National Park Service, 1849 C Street, NW, Suite NC400, Washington, DC 20240. For full text: http://www.cr.nps.gov/nr/twhp/wwwlps/lessons/91glorieta/91glorieta.htm. KW - Confederate States of America KW - Manifest Destiny KW - National Register of Historic Places KW - Westward Movement (United States) KW - ERIC, Resources in Education (RIE) KW - Teachers KW - Practitioners KW - Intermediate Grades KW - Heritage Education KW - Social Studies KW - History Instruction KW - Civil War (United States) KW - Student Educational Objectives KW - United States History KW - Historic Sites KW - Secondary Education UR - http://libproxy.lib.unc.edu/login?url=http://search.proquest.com/docview/62191489?accountid=14244 LA - English DB - ERIC N1 - Last updated - 2017-02-24 ER - TY - GEN T1 - Escalante Pueblo Curriculum: An Educator's Guide to the Exhibits and Sites at the Anasazi Heritage Center. AN - 62152375; ED480027 AB - Colorado's residents are reminded of the land's past residents, the Northern San Juan Ancestral Puebloans. Their artifacts are encountered throughout the state. What can people learn from the Ancestral Puebloans about how to live on this landscape? The "Escalante Pueblo Curriculum" is designed to enhance a teacher's options for educational activities at the Anasazi Heritage Center (Dolores, Colorado). The curriculum's broad learning goals are to help students: appreciate why archaeology and site conservation are important; understand the processes archaeologists use to study and interpret past people and lifeways; and picture the day-to-day life of the Northern San Juan Ancestral Puebloans. The curriculum is divided into four parts: (1) "The Field Trip Core" (Museum Adventures; Family Life: Listening to How People Lived; Gallery Walk: Learning from the Main Gallery Exhibits; Ancient Neighbors: Touring Dominguez and Escalante Sites); (2) "In-Depth Thematic Sections" (Pueblo Culture--Experiencing the Lifeways of a People; Corn Is Life: A Weave of Religion, Economy, and Community; A Sense of Place: Perceiving the Landscape); (3) "The Nurturing Environment--Discovering Relationships between People and Nature" (Feathered Friends: Bird Watching and Views on Birds; Nature's Harvest: Investigating Plants and Their Uses); (4) "Archaeology in Action Doing and Thinking Archaeology Science" (Why Build on the Hill?: Inquiring about Escalante; Context and Clues: Analyzing Rooms with Artifacts; and Mapping and Measuring: Estimating Population through Site Area). Contains four appendices: standards information, a glossary, annotated bibliography and readings, and teacher evaluation form. (BT) AU - Craig, Suzan M. Y1 - 2002 PY - 2002 DA - 2002 SP - 166 PB - Bureau of Land Management, Anasazi Heritage Center, 27501 Highway 184, Dolores, CO 81323. Tel: 970-882-4811; Fax: 970-882-7035. For full text: http://www.co.blm.gov/ahc/epc.pdf. SN - 1878178164 KW - Colorado KW - Site Visits KW - Anasazi (Anthropological Label) KW - Artifacts KW - ERIC, Resources in Education (RIE) KW - Practitioners KW - Teachers KW - Intermediate Grades KW - Heritage Education KW - American Indian Culture KW - Museums KW - Material Culture KW - Middle Schools KW - Thematic Approach KW - Archaeology KW - Student Educational Objectives KW - Primary Sources KW - Field Trips KW - Curriculum Enrichment KW - State Standards UR - http://libproxy.lib.unc.edu/login?url=http://search.proquest.com/docview/62152375?accountid=14244 LA - English DB - ERIC N1 - Last updated - 2017-02-24 ER - TY - JOUR T1 - America's Civil War; challenges, perspectives, opportunities AN - 51962869; 2003-055650 JF - CRM (Washington, D.C.) A2 - Sanfilippo, Pamela K. Y1 - 2002 PY - 2002 DA - 2002 SP - 47 PB - U. S. Department of the Interior, National Park Service, Cultural Resources, Washington, DC VL - 25 IS - 4 SN - 1068-4999, 1068-4999 KW - United States KW - protection KW - history KW - archaeology KW - military geology KW - American Civil War KW - wars KW - artifacts KW - 24:Quaternary geology UR - http://libproxy.lib.unc.edu/login?url=http://search.proquest.com/docview/51962869?accountid=14244 L2 - http://vb3lk7eb4t.search.serialssolutions.com/?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&rfr_id=info:sid/GeoRef&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=book&rft.jtitle=&rft.atitle=&rft.au=&rft.aulast=&rft.aufirst=&rft.date=2000-10-10&rft.volume=&rft.issue=&rft.spage=&rft.isbn=&rft.btitle=WINTER+USE+PLAN+FOR+THE+YELLOWSTONE+AND+GRAND+TETON+NATIONAL+PARKS+AND+JOHN+D.+ROCKEFELLER%2C+JR.%2C+MEMORIAL+PARKWAY%3B+FREMONT+COUNTY%2C+IDAHO%2C+GALLATIN+AND+PARK+COUNTIES%2C+MONTANA%2C+AND+PARK+AND+TETON+COUNTIES%2C+WYOMING.&rft.title=WINTER+USE+PLAN+FOR+THE+YELLOWSTONE+AND+GRAND+TETON+NATIONAL+PARKS+AND+JOHN+D.+ROCKEFELLER%2C+JR.%2C+MEMORIAL+PARKWAY%3B+FREMONT+COUNTY%2C+IDAHO%2C+GALLATIN+AND+PARK+COUNTIES%2C+MONTANA%2C+AND+PARK+AND+TETON+COUNTIES%2C+WYOMING.&rft.issn=&rft_id=info:doi/ L2 - http://www.nps.gov/history/crm/ LA - English DB - GeoRef N1 - Copyright - GeoRef, Copyright 2012, American Geosciences Institute. N1 - Date revised - 2003-01-01 N1 - PubXState - DC N1 - Document feature - illus. N1 - SuppNotes - Individual paper within scope is cited separately N1 - Last updated - 2012-06-07 N1 - SubjectsTermNotLitGenreText - American Civil War; archaeology; artifacts; history; military geology; protection; United States; wars ER - TY - JOUR T1 - Viewing the Civil War through a geological window AN - 51961138; 2003-055651 JF - CRM (Washington, D.C.) AU - Higgins, Bob A2 - Sanfilippo, Pamela K. Y1 - 2002 PY - 2002 DA - 2002 SP - 21 EP - 25 PB - U. S. Department of the Interior, National Park Service, Cultural Resources, Washington, DC VL - 25 IS - 4 SN - 1068-4999, 1068-4999 KW - United States KW - petrology KW - Virginia KW - Mississippi KW - surficial geology KW - Eastern U.S. KW - wars KW - history KW - topography KW - military geology KW - tunnels KW - American Civil War KW - Mississippi River KW - Pennsylvania KW - 13:Areal geology UR - http://libproxy.lib.unc.edu/login?url=http://search.proquest.com/docview/51961138?accountid=14244 L2 - http://vb3lk7eb4t.search.serialssolutions.com/?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&rfr_id=info:sid/ProQ%3Ageorefmodule&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.jtitle=CRM+%28Washington%2C+D.C.%29&rft.atitle=Viewing+the+Civil+War+through+a+geological+window&rft.au=Higgins%2C+Bob&rft.aulast=Higgins&rft.aufirst=Bob&rft.date=2002-01-01&rft.volume=25&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=21&rft.isbn=&rft.btitle=&rft.title=CRM+%28Washington%2C+D.C.%29&rft.issn=10684999&rft_id=info:doi/ L2 - http://www.nps.gov/history/crm/ LA - English DB - GeoRef N1 - Copyright - GeoRef, Copyright 2012, American Geosciences Institute. N1 - Date revised - 2003-01-01 N1 - Number of references - 9 N1 - PubXState - DC N1 - Document feature - illus. incl. sketch map N1 - Last updated - 2012-06-07 N1 - SubjectsTermNotLitGenreText - American Civil War; Eastern U.S.; history; military geology; Mississippi; Mississippi River; Pennsylvania; petrology; surficial geology; topography; tunnels; United States; Virginia; wars ER - TY - JOUR T1 - Research reveals dinosaurs and other fossil wildlife at Big Bend AN - 51843481; 2004-042544 JF - Park Science AU - Anonymous Y1 - 2002 PY - 2002 DA - 2002 SP - 7 PB - National Park Service, U.S. Department of the Interior, Corvallis, OR VL - 21 IS - 2 SN - 0735-9462, 0735-9462 KW - United States KW - Diapsida KW - Cretaceous KW - Upper Cretaceous KW - Ornithopoda KW - Archosauria KW - Richardoestesia isosceles KW - Theropoda KW - Ceratopsia KW - dinosaurs KW - Hadrosauridae KW - Chordata KW - Brewster County Texas KW - Texas KW - Richardoestesia KW - teeth KW - Mesozoic KW - Reptilia KW - paleoenvironment KW - Big Bend National Park KW - Saurischia KW - Saurornitholestes KW - Vertebrata KW - Ornithischia KW - Tetrapoda KW - 11:Vertebrate paleontology UR - http://libproxy.lib.unc.edu/login?url=http://search.proquest.com/docview/51843481?accountid=14244 L2 - http://vb3lk7eb4t.search.serialssolutions.com/?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&rfr_id=info:sid/ProQ%3Ageorefmodule&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.jtitle=USGS+Fact+Sheet+FS-154-00&rft.atitle=Chinese+Tallow%3A+Invading+the+Southeastern+Coastal+Plain&rft.au=&rft.aulast=&rft.aufirst=&rft.date=2000-10-01&rft.volume=&rft.issue=&rft.spage=&rft.isbn=&rft.btitle=&rft.title=USGS+Fact+Sheet+FS-154-00&rft.issn=&rft_id=info:doi/ L2 - http://www2.nature.nps.gov/ParkScience/ LA - English DB - GeoRef N1 - Copyright - GeoRef, Copyright 2012, American Geosciences Institute. N1 - Date revised - 2004-01-01 N1 - PubXState - OR N1 - Document feature - illus. N1 - Last updated - 2012-06-07 N1 - SubjectsTermNotLitGenreText - Archosauria; Big Bend National Park; Brewster County Texas; Ceratopsia; Chordata; Cretaceous; Diapsida; dinosaurs; Hadrosauridae; Mesozoic; Ornithischia; Ornithopoda; paleoenvironment; Reptilia; Richardoestesia; Richardoestesia isosceles; Saurischia; Saurornitholestes; teeth; Tetrapoda; Texas; Theropoda; United States; Upper Cretaceous; Vertebrata ER - TY - JOUR T1 - Hindsight makes better foresight; paleontology as a new tool for conservation AN - 51843058; 2004-042546 JF - Park Science AU - Chure, Dan Y1 - 2002 PY - 2002 DA - 2002 SP - 43 EP - 46 PB - National Park Service, U.S. Department of the Interior, Corvallis, OR VL - 21 IS - 2 SN - 0735-9462, 0735-9462 KW - United States KW - biodiversity KW - Quaternary KW - Australasia KW - national parks KW - public lands KW - Cenozoic KW - conservation KW - DNA KW - extinction KW - ecology KW - Australia KW - fossil record KW - 08:General paleontology UR - http://libproxy.lib.unc.edu/login?url=http://search.proquest.com/docview/51843058?accountid=14244 L2 - http://vb3lk7eb4t.search.serialssolutions.com/?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&rfr_id=info:sid/ProQ%3Ageorefmodule&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.jtitle=Park+Science&rft.atitle=Hindsight+makes+better+foresight%3B+paleontology+as+a+new+tool+for+conservation&rft.au=Chure%2C+Dan&rft.aulast=Chure&rft.aufirst=Dan&rft.date=2002-01-01&rft.volume=21&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=43&rft.isbn=&rft.btitle=&rft.title=Park+Science&rft.issn=07359462&rft_id=info:doi/ L2 - http://www2.nature.nps.gov/ParkScience/ LA - English DB - GeoRef N1 - Copyright - GeoRef, Copyright 2012, American Geosciences Institute. N1 - Date revised - 2004-01-01 N1 - Number of references - 8 N1 - PubXState - OR N1 - Document feature - illus. N1 - Last updated - 2012-06-07 N1 - SubjectsTermNotLitGenreText - Australasia; Australia; biodiversity; Cenozoic; conservation; DNA; ecology; extinction; fossil record; national parks; public lands; Quaternary; United States ER - TY - JOUR T1 - Atmospheric nitrogen deposition; implications for managers of Western U.S. parks AN - 51842359; 2004-042545 JF - Park Science AU - Meixner, Thomas AU - Allen, Edith B AU - Tonnessen, Kathy AU - Fenn, Mark AU - Poth, Mark Y1 - 2002 PY - 2002 DA - 2002 SP - 30 EP - 33 PB - National Park Service, U.S. Department of the Interior, Corvallis, OR VL - 21 IS - 2 SN - 0735-9462, 0735-9462 KW - United States KW - soils KW - hydrology KW - biomass KW - human activity KW - pollution KW - national parks KW - public lands KW - environmental analysis KW - nitrogen KW - deposition KW - atmospheric transport KW - Western U.S. KW - ecology KW - 22:Environmental geology UR - http://libproxy.lib.unc.edu/login?url=http://search.proquest.com/docview/51842359?accountid=14244 L2 - http://vb3lk7eb4t.search.serialssolutions.com/?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&rfr_id=info:sid/ProQ%3Ageorefmodule&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.jtitle=Park+Science&rft.atitle=Atmospheric+nitrogen+deposition%3B+implications+for+managers+of+Western+U.S.+parks&rft.au=Meixner%2C+Thomas%3BAllen%2C+Edith+B%3BTonnessen%2C+Kathy%3BFenn%2C+Mark%3BPoth%2C+Mark&rft.aulast=Meixner&rft.aufirst=Thomas&rft.date=2002-01-01&rft.volume=21&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=30&rft.isbn=&rft.btitle=&rft.title=Park+Science&rft.issn=07359462&rft_id=info:doi/ L2 - http://www2.nature.nps.gov/ParkScience/ LA - English DB - GeoRef N1 - Copyright - GeoRef, Copyright 2012, American Geosciences Institute. N1 - Date revised - 2004-01-01 N1 - PubXState - OR N1 - Document feature - illus. N1 - Last updated - 2012-06-07 N1 - SubjectsTermNotLitGenreText - atmospheric transport; biomass; deposition; ecology; environmental analysis; human activity; hydrology; national parks; nitrogen; pollution; public lands; soils; United States; Western U.S. ER - TY - RPRT T1 - Our vanishing past; the crisis of cultural and paleontological resources on BLM lands AN - 51789518; 2004-078375 JF - Our vanishing past; the crisis of cultural and paleontological resources on BLM lands Y1 - 2002 PY - 2002 DA - 2002 SP - 133 VL - BLM/WO/GI-02/004 KW - United States KW - U. S. Bureau of Land Management KW - public policy KW - government agencies KW - artifacts KW - Cenozoic KW - conservation KW - Western U.S. KW - dinosaurs KW - Chordata KW - archaeology KW - Quaternary KW - geologic sites KW - human activity KW - Mammalia KW - public lands KW - Mesozoic KW - Reptilia KW - history KW - archaeological sites KW - land management KW - fossils KW - Vertebrata KW - Tetrapoda KW - preservation KW - land use KW - 22:Environmental geology UR - http://libproxy.lib.unc.edu/login?url=http://search.proquest.com/docview/51789518?accountid=14244 L2 - http://vb3lk7eb4t.search.serialssolutions.com/?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&rfr_id=info:sid/GeoRef&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=book&rft.jtitle=&rft.atitle=&rft.au=&rft.aulast=&rft.aufirst=&rft.date=2002-01-01&rft.volume=&rft.issue=&rft.spage=&rft.isbn=&rft.btitle=Mineral+investigation+in+the+Stikine+area%2C+central+southeast+Alaska%2C+1997-1998&rft.title=Mineral+investigation+in+the+Stikine+area%2C+central+southeast+Alaska%2C+1997-1998&rft.issn=&rft_id=info:doi/ LA - English DB - GeoRef N1 - Copyright - GeoRef, Copyright 2012, American Geosciences Institute. N1 - Date revised - 2004-01-01 N1 - Availability - U. S. Department of the Interior, Bureau of Land Management, Printed Materials Distribution Service, Denver, CO, United States N1 - Document feature - illus. N1 - Last updated - 2012-06-07 ER - TY - RPRT T1 - Effect of Drought on Streamflow and Stream-Water Quality in Colorado, July through September 2002 AN - 21018686; 7550827 AB - During 2002, Colorado experienced the States worst drought since 1977. In 2003, the U.S. Geological Survey entered into cooperative agreement with the Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment to evaluate the general effects of drought on the water quality of streams in Colorado during summer 2002 by analyzing a water-quality data set obtained during summer 2002 in cooperation with a variety of State and local governments. Water samples were collected at 148 stream sites in Colorado and were measured or analyzed for field properties, major ions, nutrients, organic carbon, bacteria, and dissolved and total recoverable metals. JF - Scientific Investigations Report. United States Geological Survey AU - Chafin, D T AU - Druliner, AD Y1 - 2002///0, PY - 2002 DA - 0, 2002 SP - 143 PB - United States Geological Survey KW - Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts; Pollution Abstracts; ASFA 2: Ocean Technology Policy & Non-Living Resources; Water Resources Abstracts KW - USGS-SIR-2006-5322 KW - Drought (2002) KW - Colorado KW - Effects KW - Water quality KW - Streams KW - Water samples KW - 148 stream sites KW - water quality KW - Water sampling KW - geological surveys KW - Organic carbon KW - Geological Surveys KW - Drought KW - Freshwater KW - Environmental factors KW - Flow rates KW - Public health KW - Public Health KW - Varieties KW - Environmental effects KW - cooperatives KW - Droughts KW - Metals KW - Ions KW - Organic Carbon KW - Water Quality KW - Streamflow KW - Stream flow KW - USA, Colorado KW - Geological surveys KW - summer KW - P 2000:FRESHWATER POLLUTION KW - Q2 09171:Dynamics of lakes and rivers KW - SW 3030:Effects of pollution KW - M2 556.16:Runoff (556.16) UR - http://libproxy.lib.unc.edu/login?url=http://search.proquest.com/docview/21018686?accountid=14244 L2 - http://vb3lk7eb4t.search.serialssolutions.com/?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&rfr_id=info:sid/Pollution+Abstracts&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=report&rft.jtitle=&rft.atitle=&rft.au=Chafin%2C+D+T%3BDruliner%2C+AD&rft.aulast=Chafin&rft.aufirst=D&rft.date=2002-01-01&rft.volume=&rft.issue=&rft.spage=143&rft.isbn=&rft.btitle=Effect+of+Drought+on+Streamflow+and+Stream-Water+Quality+in+Colorado%2C+July+through+September+2002&rft.title=Effect+of+Drought+on+Streamflow+and+Stream-Water+Quality+in+Colorado%2C+July+through+September+2002&rft.issn=&rft_id=info:doi/ LA - English DB - ProQuest Environmental Science Collection N1 - Date revised - 2007-09-01 N1 - SuppNotes - Order this product from NTIS by: phone at 1-800-553-NTIS (U.S. customers); (703)605-6000 (other countries); fax at (703)605-6900; e-mail: orders[at]ntis.gov. NTIS Prices: PC A08 I1: 5322; Prepared in cooperation with Colorado Dept. of Public Health and Environment, Denver. N1 - Last updated - 2016-05-27 ER - TY - RPRT T1 - Geochemistry of the Little Lost River Drainage Basin, Idaho AN - 20982582; 6261718 AB - The U.S. Geological Survey and Idaho State University, in cooperation with the U.S. Department of Energy, are conducting studies to describe the chemical character of ground water that moves as underflow from drainage basins into the Snake River Plain aquifer (SRPA) system at and near the Idaho National Engineering and Environmental Laboratory (INEEL) and the effects of these recharge waters on the geochemistry of the SRPA system. Each of these recharge waters has a hydro-chemical character related to geochemical processes, especially water-rock interactions that occur during migration to the SRPA. Results of these studies will benefit ongoing and planned geochemical modeling of the SRPA at the INEEL by providing model input on the hydro-chemical character of water from each drainage basin. For this study, water samples were collected from six wells and two surface-water sites from the Little Lost River drainage basin during 2000 and analyzed for selected inorganic constituents, dissolved organic carbon, stable isotopes, tritium, and selected gross measurements of radioactivity. JF - Water Resources Investigations Report. United States Geological Survey Y1 - 2002///0, PY - 2002 DA - 0, 2002 SP - 40 PB - United States Geological Survey KW - ASFA 2: Ocean Technology Policy & Non-Living Resources; Water Resources Abstracts KW - USGS-WRI-02-4120 KW - Aquifers KW - Rivers KW - Water Analysis KW - Drainage KW - Catchment Areas KW - Geochemistry KW - Water resources KW - River basins KW - Freshwater KW - Environmental factors KW - Model Studies KW - USA, Idaho, Sawtooth Valley, Snake R. KW - Tritium KW - USA, Idaho, Little Lost R. KW - Dissolved organic carbon KW - Radioactivity KW - Groundwater KW - Groundwater Recharge KW - SW 0880:Chemical processes KW - Q2 09183:Physics and chemistry UR - http://libproxy.lib.unc.edu/login?url=http://search.proquest.com/docview/20982582?accountid=14244 L2 - http://vb3lk7eb4t.search.serialssolutions.com/?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&rfr_id=info:sid/Water+Resources+Abstracts&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=report&rft.jtitle=&rft.atitle=&rft.au=&rft.aulast=&rft.aufirst=&rft.date=2002-01-01&rft.volume=&rft.issue=&rft.spage=40&rft.isbn=&rft.btitle=Geochemistry+of+the+Little+Lost+River+Drainage+Basin%2C+Idaho&rft.title=Geochemistry+of+the+Little+Lost+River+Drainage+Basin%2C+Idaho&rft.issn=&rft_id=info:doi/ LA - English DB - ProQuest Environmental Science Collection N1 - Date revised - 2006-10-01 N1 - SuppNotes - Product reproduced from digital image. Order this product from NTIS by: phone at 1-800-553-NTIS (U.S. customers); (703)605-6000 (other countries); fax at (703)605-6900; e-mail: orders[at]ntis.gov. NTIS Prices: PC A04/MF A01 N1 - Last updated - 2016-12-21 ER - TY - RPRT T1 - Periphyton Communities in Streams of the Ozark Plateaus and Their Relations to Selected Environmental Factors AN - 20729133; 6261890 AB - The purpose of this report is to present relations between periphyton (within this report defined as attached benthic algae, including blue-green algae or cyanobacteria) community characteristics, and physical, chemical, and biological factors for representative sections (reaches) of selected Ozark Plateaus (Ozark) streams. A limited discussion of macroalgae (primarily attached or floating filaments) abundance and distribution among Ozark streams is included in this report. The emphasis of the NAWQA Program is water quality; hence, the relation of periphyton communities to water quality is an important focus of this report. However, periphyton community characteristics related to water quality must be considered in conjunction with differences in other physical and biological factors because these factors are known to affect periphyton communities in streams. JF - Water Resources Investigations Report. United States Geological Survey AU - Petersen, J C AU - Femmer Y1 - 2002///0, PY - 2002 DA - 0, 2002 PB - United States Geological Survey KW - Microbiology Abstracts C: Algology, Mycology & Protozoology; Pollution Abstracts; ASFA 1: Biological Sciences & Living Resources; Water Resources Abstracts KW - USGS-WRI-02-4210 KW - water quality KW - Phytobenthos KW - Abundance KW - USA, Arkansas, Ozark Plateau KW - Water resources KW - Freshwater KW - Water quality KW - Streams KW - Environmental factors KW - Filaments KW - Algae KW - Rivers KW - environmental factors KW - Quantitative distribution KW - Water Quality KW - plateaus KW - Community composition KW - Cyanobacteria KW - Periphyton KW - Cyanophyta KW - abundance KW - Q1 08462:Benthos KW - P 2000:FRESHWATER POLLUTION KW - SW 3030:Effects of pollution KW - K 03450:Ecology UR - http://libproxy.lib.unc.edu/login?url=http://search.proquest.com/docview/20729133?accountid=14244 L2 - http://vb3lk7eb4t.search.serialssolutions.com/?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&rfr_id=info:sid/Pollution+Abstracts&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=report&rft.jtitle=&rft.atitle=&rft.au=Petersen%2C+J+C%3BFemmer&rft.aulast=Petersen&rft.aufirst=J&rft.date=2002-01-01&rft.volume=&rft.issue=&rft.spage=&rft.isbn=&rft.btitle=Periphyton+Communities+in+Streams+of+the+Ozark+Plateaus+and+Their+Relations+to+Selected+Environmental+Factors&rft.title=Periphyton+Communities+in+Streams+of+the+Ozark+Plateaus+and+Their+Relations+to+Selected+Environmental+Factors&rft.issn=&rft_id=info:doi/ LA - English DB - ProQuest Environmental Science Collection N1 - Date revised - 2006-07-01 N1 - SuppNotes - Order this product from NTIS by: phone at 1-800-553-NTIS (U.S. customers); (703)605-6000 (other countries); fax at (703)605-6900; e-mail: orders[at]ntis.gov. NTIS Prices: AV A06; This document is color dependent and/or in landscape layout. It is currently available on CD-ROM and paper only. N1 - Last updated - 2016-12-22 ER - TY - RPRT T1 - Geophysical Logging to Determine Construction, Contributing Zones, and Appropriate Use of Water Levels Measured in Confined- Aquifer Network Wells, San Luis Valley, Colorado, 1998-2000 AN - 20717437; 6261781 AB - Geophysical logs were recorded in 32 wells in the confined- aquifer monitoring well network maintained by the Rio Grande Water Conservation District. Logging results were used to determine well construction, zones contributing water to the wells, and the purposes for which the ground-water levels measured in the wells can be used. The confined-aquifer well network consists of 42 flowing and nonflowing wells. This network consists of wells used to supply water for irrigation, household use, wildlife refuge supply, and stock use, and wells for water-level monitoring. Geophysical logs recorded in the wells included video, caliper, water specific conductance, water temperature, and water flow. JF - Water Resources Investigations Report. United States Geological Survey AU - Brendle, D L Y1 - 2002///0, PY - 2002 DA - 0, 2002 PB - United States Geological Survey KW - Sustainability Science Abstracts; Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts; Water Resources Abstracts KW - USGS-WRI-02-4058 KW - Aquifers KW - Water conservation KW - Water Supply KW - Water temperatures KW - households KW - Geophysics KW - Conductance KW - valleys KW - Wildlife KW - Irrigation KW - logging KW - Water Level KW - Water Table KW - irrigation water KW - Water table fluctuations KW - USA, Colorado KW - water levels KW - USA, Colorado, San Luis Valley KW - water flow KW - Water wells KW - Monitoring KW - Groundwater KW - water temperature KW - M3 1010:Issues in Sustainable Development KW - SW 2040:Groundwater management KW - M2 556.3:Groundwater Hydrology (556.3) UR - http://libproxy.lib.unc.edu/login?url=http://search.proquest.com/docview/20717437?accountid=14244 L2 - http://vb3lk7eb4t.search.serialssolutions.com/?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&rfr_id=info:sid/Sustainability+Science+Abstracts&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=report&rft.jtitle=&rft.atitle=&rft.au=&rft.aulast=&rft.aufirst=&rft.date=2000-09-27&rft.volume=&rft.issue=&rft.spage=&rft.isbn=&rft.btitle=CONSTRUCTION+INTO+THE+POWDER+RIVER+BASIN%2C+POWDER+RIVER+BASIN+EXPANSION+PROJECT%3B+BLUE+EARTH%2C+BROWN%2C+DODGE%2C+LINCOLN%2C+LYON%2C+NICOLLET%2C+OLMSTED%2C+REDWOOD%2C+STEELE%2C+WASECA%2C+AND+WINONA+COUNTIES%2C+MINNESOTA%2C+BEADLE%2C+BROOKINGS%2C+CUSTER%2C+FALL+RIVER%2C+HAAKON%2C+HAND%2C+HUGHES%2C+HYDE%2C+JACKSON%2C+KINGSBURY%2C+PENNINGTON%2C+AND+STANLEY+COUNTIES%2C+SOUTH+DAKOTA%2C+AND+CAMPBELL%2C+CONVERSE%2C+NIOBRARA%2C+AND+WESTON+COUNTIES%2C+WYOMING.&rft.title=CONSTRUCTION+INTO+THE+POWDER+RIVER+BASIN%2C+POWDER+RIVER+BASIN+EXPANSION+PROJECT%3B+BLUE+EARTH%2C+BROWN%2C+DODGE%2C+LINCOLN%2C+LYON%2C+NICOLLET%2C+OLMSTED%2C+REDWOOD%2C+STEELE%2C+WASECA%2C+AND+WINONA+COUNTIES%2C+MINNESOTA%2C+BEADLE%2C+BROOKINGS%2C+CUSTER%2C+FALL+RIVER%2C+HAAKON%2C+HAND%2C+HUGHES%2C+HYDE%2C+JACKSON%2C+KINGSBURY%2C+PENNINGTON%2C+AND+STANLEY+COUNTIES%2C+SOUTH+DAKOTA%2C+AND+CAMPBELL%2C+CONVERSE%2C+NIOBRARA%2C+AND+WESTON+COUNTIES%2C+WYOMING.&rft.issn=&rft_id=info:doi/ LA - English DB - ProQuest Environmental Science Collection N1 - Date revised - 2006-12-01 N1 - SuppNotes - Order this product from NTIS by: phone at 1-800-553-NTIS (U.S. customers); (703)605-6000 (other countries); fax at (703)605-6900; e-mail: orders[at]ntis.gov. NTIS Prices: AV A05; This document is color dependent and/or in landscape layout. It is currently only available on CD-ROM. Prepared in cooperation with Colorado Div. of Water Resources, Denver. N1 - Last updated - 2016-12-21 ER - TY - RPRT T1 - Relation of Environmental Characteristics to the Composition of Aquatic Assemblages along a Gradient of Urban Land Use in New Jersey, 1996-98. National Water-Quality Assessment Program AN - 20713768; 6261848 AB - This report evaluates the most sensitive environmental and biological features in impaired basins, develops predictive models of stream degradation for urban watersheds, and identifies the important environmental factors that affect the distribution of fish, invertebrate, and algal assemblages along an urban land-use gradient. It includes a description of field, analytical, and statistical methods, lists of the fish, invertebrate, and algal assemblages sampled, and evaluates the relation of aquatic- assemblage structure to a suite of environmental parameters (that is, hydrology, water quality, physical habitat, and surrounding landscape features). JF - Water Resources Investigations Report. United States Geological Survey AU - Kennen, J G AU - Ayers, MA Y1 - 2002///0, PY - 2002 DA - 0, 2002 PB - United States Geological Survey KW - ASFA 3: Aquatic Pollution & Environmental Quality; Pollution Abstracts; Microbiology Abstracts C: Algology, Mycology & Protozoology; Water Resources Abstracts KW - USGS-WRI-02-4069 KW - Land Use KW - Prediction KW - water quality KW - Resource management KW - Statistics KW - USA, New Jersey KW - Degradation KW - Ecological distribution KW - Basins KW - Water resources KW - Invertebrates KW - Freshwater KW - Watersheds KW - Water quality KW - Streams KW - Environmental factors KW - Stream Degradation KW - invertebrates KW - Models KW - Hydrologic Models KW - Assessments KW - Hydrology KW - Urban areas KW - Algae KW - Environmental surveys KW - environmental factors KW - Landscape KW - Water Quality KW - Habitat KW - Land use KW - Fish KW - Water Resources KW - P 2000:FRESHWATER POLLUTION KW - SW 3010:Identification of pollutants KW - Q5 08502:Methods and instruments KW - K 03450:Ecology UR - http://libproxy.lib.unc.edu/login?url=http://search.proquest.com/docview/20713768?accountid=14244 L2 - http://vb3lk7eb4t.search.serialssolutions.com/?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&rfr_id=info:sid/Aquatic+Science+%26+Fisheries+Abstracts+%28ASFA%29+3%3A+Aquatic+Pollution+%26+Environmental+Quality&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=report&rft.jtitle=&rft.atitle=&rft.au=Kennen%2C+J+G%3BAyers%2C+MA&rft.aulast=Kennen&rft.aufirst=J&rft.date=2002-01-01&rft.volume=&rft.issue=&rft.spage=&rft.isbn=&rft.btitle=Relation+of+Environmental+Characteristics+to+the+Composition+of+Aquatic+Assemblages+along+a+Gradient+of+Urban+Land+Use+in+New+Jersey%2C+1996-98.+National+Water-Quality+Assessment+Program&rft.title=Relation+of+Environmental+Characteristics+to+the+Composition+of+Aquatic+Assemblages+along+a+Gradient+of+Urban+Land+Use+in+New+Jersey%2C+1996-98.+National+Water-Quality+Assessment+Program&rft.issn=&rft_id=info:doi/ LA - English DB - ProQuest Environmental Science Collection N1 - Date revised - 2006-10-01 N1 - SuppNotes - Available on CD-Rom and in paper copy only. Order this product from NTIS by: phone at 1-800-553-NTIS (U.S. customers); (703)605- 6000 (other countries); fax at (703)605-6900; e-mail: orders[at]ntis.gov. NTIS Prices: AV A06; This document is color dependent and/or in landscape layout. It is currently only available on CD-ROM. N1 - Last updated - 2016-12-22 ER - TY - RPRT T1 - Third U.S. Geological Survey Wildland Fire Science Workshop, Denver, Colorado, November 12-15, 2002 AN - 20163258; 7293824 AB - Contents include: Executive Summary; Preface, Introduction; Summary of the Third Wildland Fire-Science Workshop; Summary and Conclusions; Reference Cited; Appendix A-Agenda for Pre-Workshop Field Trip; Appendix B-Workshop Agenda; Appendix C-List of Workshop Attendees by Agency; Appendix D-Poster Session Abstracts; Appendix E-White Paper on Pre-Fire Risk Assessment and Fuels Mapping; Appendix F-White Paper on Post-Fire Effects, Including Physical and Biological; Appendix G-White Paper on Rehabilitation and Restoration; Appendix H-White Paper on a USGS Fire Response Plan and Tables. JF - Scientific Investigations Report. United States Geological Survey AU - Livingston, R K Y1 - 2002 PY - 2002 DA - 2002 SP - 84 PB - United States Geological Survey KW - Sustainability Science Abstracts KW - USGS-SIR-2004-5005 KW - Meetings KW - Forest fires KW - Fire management KW - Fire prevention KW - Reduction KW - Risks KW - Fuels KW - Wildfires KW - Risk assessment KW - Fires KW - USA, Colorado KW - wildland fire KW - Wildfire KW - USA, Colorado, Denver KW - geological surveys KW - Mapping KW - M3 1010:Issues in Sustainable Development UR - http://libproxy.lib.unc.edu/login?url=http://search.proquest.com/docview/20163258?accountid=14244 L2 - http://vb3lk7eb4t.search.serialssolutions.com/?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&rfr_id=info:sid/Sustainability+Science+Abstracts&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=report&rft.jtitle=&rft.atitle=&rft.au=&rft.aulast=&rft.aufirst=&rft.date=2000-09-25&rft.volume=&rft.issue=&rft.spage=&rft.isbn=&rft.btitle=CORTINA+INTEGRATED+WASTE+MANAGEMENT+PROJECT%2C+CORTINA+INDIAN+RANCHERIA+OF+WINTUN+INDIANS%2C+COLUSA+COUNTY%2C+CALIFORNIA.&rft.title=CORTINA+INTEGRATED+WASTE+MANAGEMENT+PROJECT%2C+CORTINA+INDIAN+RANCHERIA+OF+WINTUN+INDIANS%2C+COLUSA+COUNTY%2C+CALIFORNIA.&rft.issn=&rft_id=info:doi/ LA - English DB - ProQuest Environmental Science Collection N1 - Date revised - 2009-09-01 N1 - SuppNotes - Product reproduced from digital image. Order this product from NTIS by: phone at 1-800-553-NTIS (U.S. customers); (703)605-6000 (other countries); fax at (703)605-6900; e-mail: orders[at]ntis.gov. NTIS Prices: PC A06/MF A01 N1 - Last updated - 2015-03-30 ER - TY - RPRT T1 - Water Resources Data Alabama, Water Year 2001 AN - 19976583; 7295019 AB - This volume of the annual hydrologic data report of Alabama is one of a series of annual reports that document hydrologic data gathered from the U.S. Geological Survey's surface- and ground- water data-collection network in each State, Puerto Rico, and the Trust Territories. These records of streamflow, ground-water levels, and quality of water provide the hydrologic information needed by State, local and Federal agencies, and the private sector for developing and managing our Nation's land and water resources. JF - Water Data Report. United States Geological Survey AU - Pearman, J L AU - Sricklin, V E AU - Psinakis, W L Y1 - 2002///0, PY - 2002 DA - 0, 2002 SP - 688 PB - United States Geological Survey KW - Pollution Abstracts; ASFA 2: Ocean Technology Policy & Non-Living Resources; Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts; Water Resources Abstracts KW - USGS-WDR-AL-01-1 KW - Water resources KW - Water quality KW - Hydrology data KW - Alabama KW - Water year KW - Surface water KW - Ground water KW - Water levels KW - Water discharge KW - Streams KW - Lakes KW - Reservoirs KW - Wells KW - Gaging stations KW - Stream flow KW - Sediments KW - Turbitity KW - Precipitation KW - Water temperature KW - Dissolved oxygen KW - Water analysis KW - Sampling sites KW - water quality KW - territory KW - Water resources data KW - Data reports KW - Water Resources Data KW - Groundwater Pollution KW - Hydrologic data KW - Flow rates KW - USA, Alabama KW - Networks KW - Geology KW - Hydrologic Data KW - ASW, Greater Antilles, Puerto Rico KW - Annual reports KW - Streamflow KW - private sector KW - Water management KW - Governments KW - Home range KW - Groundwater KW - Resource development KW - Water Resources KW - P 2000:FRESHWATER POLLUTION KW - SW 0835:Streamflow and runoff KW - M2 556.18:Water Management (556.18) KW - Q2 09261:General UR - http://libproxy.lib.unc.edu/login?url=http://search.proquest.com/docview/19976583?accountid=14244 L2 - http://vb3lk7eb4t.search.serialssolutions.com/?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&rfr_id=info:sid/Pollution+Abstracts&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=report&rft.jtitle=&rft.atitle=&rft.au=Pearman%2C+J+L%3BSricklin%2C+V+E%3BPsinakis%2C+W+L&rft.aulast=Pearman&rft.aufirst=J&rft.date=2002-01-01&rft.volume=&rft.issue=&rft.spage=688&rft.isbn=&rft.btitle=Water+Resources+Data+Alabama%2C+Water+Year+2001&rft.title=Water+Resources+Data+Alabama%2C+Water+Year+2001&rft.issn=&rft_id=info:doi/ LA - English DB - ProQuest Environmental Science Collection N1 - Date revised - 2007-04-01 N1 - SuppNotes - Product reproduced from digital image. Order this product from NTIS by: phone at 1-800-553-NTIS (U.S. customers); (703)605-6000 (other countries); fax at (703)605-6900; e-mail: orders[at]ntis.gov. NTIS Prices: PC A99/MF A06 N1 - Last updated - 2016-05-27 ER - TY - RPRT T1 - Selected Ground-Water Data for Yucca Mountain Region, Southern Nevada and Eastern California, Through December 1998 AN - 19976335; 7292824 AB - The U.S. Geological Survey, in support of the U.S. Department of Energy, Yucca Mountain Site Characterization Project, collects, compiles, and summarizes hydrologic data in the Yucca Mountain region. The data are collected to allow assessments of groundwater resources during studies to determine the potential suitability of Yucca Mountain for storing high level nuclear waste. Data on ground-water levels at 34 wells and a fissure (Devils Hole), ground-water discharge at 5 springs and a flowing well, and total reported groundwater withdrawals within Crater Flat, Jackass Flats, Mercury Valley, and the Amargosa Desert are presented for calendar year 1998. Data collected prior to 1998 are graphically presented and data collected by other agencies (or as part of other Geological Survey programs) are included to further indicate variations of ground-water levels, discharges, and withdrawals through time. JF - Open-file Report. U.S. Geological Survey Y1 - 2002///0, PY - 2002 DA - 0, 2002 SP - 98 PB - United States Geological Survey KW - Pollution Abstracts; Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts; Water Resources Abstracts KW - USGS-OFR-99-250 KW - Hydrology KW - Ground water KW - California KW - Nevada KW - Data collection KW - Discharge data KW - Withdrawal data KW - Quality assurance KW - Sites KW - Procedures KW - Equipment KW - Water-level data KW - Yucca Mountain Region KW - Jackass Flats KW - Selective Withdrawal KW - Meteorite craters KW - Groundwater hydrology KW - USA, Nevada, Yucca Mt. KW - Mercury's craters KW - geological surveys KW - Groundwater Pollution KW - Hydrologic data KW - USA, Nevada KW - Geological Surveys KW - Mountains KW - Radioactive waste disposal underground KW - Assessments KW - USA, California KW - Hydrologic Data KW - Craters KW - valleys KW - Groundwater withdrawal KW - Radioactive wastes KW - Groundwater resources KW - USA, Nevada, Devils Hole KW - craters KW - Deserts KW - Mercury KW - Groundwater pollution KW - Groundwater KW - SW 5010:Network design KW - P 2000:FRESHWATER POLLUTION KW - M2 556.3:Groundwater Hydrology (556.3) UR - http://libproxy.lib.unc.edu/login?url=http://search.proquest.com/docview/19976335?accountid=14244 L2 - http://vb3lk7eb4t.search.serialssolutions.com/?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&rfr_id=info:sid/Pollution+Abstracts&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=report&rft.jtitle=&rft.atitle=&rft.au=&rft.aulast=&rft.aufirst=&rft.date=2002-01-01&rft.volume=&rft.issue=&rft.spage=98&rft.isbn=&rft.btitle=Selected+Ground-Water+Data+for+Yucca+Mountain+Region%2C+Southern+Nevada+and+Eastern+California%2C+Through+December+1998&rft.title=Selected+Ground-Water+Data+for+Yucca+Mountain+Region%2C+Southern+Nevada+and+Eastern+California%2C+Through+December+1998&rft.issn=&rft_id=info:doi/ LA - English DB - ProQuest Environmental Science Collection N1 - Date revised - 2007-04-01 N1 - SuppNotes - Product reproduced from digital image. Order this product from NTIS by: phone at 1-800-553-NTIS (U.S. customers); (703)605-6000 (other countries); fax at (703)605-6900; e-mail: orders[at]ntis.gov. NTIS Prices: PC A06/MF A02; Sponsored by Department of Energy, Washington, DC. N1 - Last updated - 2016-05-27 ER - TY - RPRT T1 - Streamflow and Nutrient Data for the Yazoo River below Steele Bayou near Long Lake, Mississippi, 1996-2000 AN - 19938139; 6261899 AB - This report describes the complex hydrology of the lower Yazoo River and the methods and procedures used to compute streamflow, statistical descriptions of the concentrations of nitrogen and phosphorus in the Yazoo River, and the methods and results of load computations for nitrogen and phosphorus. The concentrations of nitrogen and phosphorus in the Yazoo River are compared to data collected earlier from a site upstream of the current location as well as data collected from the Mississippi River. The water- quality data are based on water samples collected from the Yazoo River from February 1996 through December 2000. Annual loads of nitrogen and phosphorous were computed by using ESTIMATOR software that uses multivariate regression. JF - Water Resources Investigations Report. United States Geological Survey AU - Runner AU - Turnipseed, D P AU - Coupe, R H Y1 - 2002///0, PY - 2002 DA - 0, 2002 PB - United States Geological Survey KW - Pollution Abstracts; ASFA 2: Ocean Technology Policy & Non-Living Resources; Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts; Water Resources Abstracts KW - USGS-WRI-02-4215 KW - Water sampling KW - Water Pollution Sources KW - Statistical analysis KW - Phosphorus KW - Water resources KW - Freshwater KW - Water quality KW - Flow rates KW - USA, Mississippi, Yazoo R. KW - Computer programs KW - Nutrients in river water KW - upstream KW - Lakes KW - Hydrology KW - Hydrologic Data KW - Rivers KW - River flow KW - Water Quality KW - River discharge KW - Pollution Load KW - Streamflow KW - North America, Mississippi R. KW - USA, Minnesota, Long L. KW - Phosphorus in river water KW - Nutrients (mineral) KW - Nitrogen in river water KW - Nitrogen KW - M2 556.5:Surface Water Hydrology (556.5) KW - Q2 09184:Composition of water KW - P 2000:FRESHWATER POLLUTION KW - SW 3020:Sources and fate of pollution KW - Q2 09171:Dynamics of lakes and rivers UR - http://libproxy.lib.unc.edu/login?url=http://search.proquest.com/docview/19938139?accountid=14244 L2 - http://vb3lk7eb4t.search.serialssolutions.com/?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&rfr_id=info:sid/Pollution+Abstracts&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=report&rft.jtitle=&rft.atitle=&rft.au=Runner%3BTurnipseed%2C+D+P%3BCoupe%2C+R+H&rft.aulast=Runner&rft.aufirst=&rft.date=2002-01-01&rft.volume=&rft.issue=&rft.spage=&rft.isbn=&rft.btitle=Streamflow+and+Nutrient+Data+for+the+Yazoo+River+below+Steele+Bayou+near+Long+Lake%2C+Mississippi%2C+1996-2000&rft.title=Streamflow+and+Nutrient+Data+for+the+Yazoo+River+below+Steele+Bayou+near+Long+Lake%2C+Mississippi%2C+1996-2000&rft.issn=&rft_id=info:doi/ LA - English DB - ProQuest Environmental Science Collection N1 - Date revised - 2006-07-01 N1 - SuppNotes - Order this product from NTIS by: phone at 1-800-553-NTIS (U.S. customers); (703)605-6000 (other countries); fax at (703)605-6900; e-mail: orders[at]ntis.gov. NTIS Prices: AV A04; This document is color dependent and/or in landscape layout. It is currently available on CD-ROM and paper only. N1 - Last updated - 2016-12-21 ER - TY - RPRT T1 - Occurrence and Status of Volatile Organic Compounds in Ground Water from Rural, Untreated, Self-Supplied Domestic Wells in the United States, 1986-99 AN - 19937315; 6261806 AB - The purpose of this report is to provide information on the occurence and status of VOCs at or above 0.2 (microgram per liter) in samples of ground water from the rural, self-supplied domestic wells collected by NAWQA during 1986-99, or existing data compiled by NAWQA. Occurence information is given for: (1) all VOCs as a single group, (2) seven groups of VOCs, and (3) 55 individual VOCs. Information also is presented on occurence and status of individual VOCs and mixtures of VOCs using no assessment level. Occurence describes the presence or absence of VOCs, detection frequencies, ranges of concentrations, and areal patterns of occurence. Status compares VOC concentrations to federally established drinking-water standards, health criteria, and taste /odor thresholds. JF - Water Resources Investigations Report. United States Geological Survey AU - Moran, MJ AU - Lapham, W W AU - Rowe, B L AU - Zogorski, J S Y1 - 2002///0, PY - 2002 DA - 0, 2002 PB - United States Geological Survey KW - Pollution Abstracts; Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts; Water Resources Abstracts KW - USGS-WRI-02-4085 KW - Organic compounds in water KW - Water Quality KW - Water Supply KW - Groundwater Pollution KW - Volatile organic compounds in groundwater KW - Domestic Water KW - Odors KW - Well Water KW - Chemical composition of groundwater KW - USA KW - Assessments KW - Water wells KW - Organic Compounds KW - Groundwater KW - Drinking water KW - Hydrologic Data KW - Volatile organic compounds KW - Rural areas KW - P 2000:FRESHWATER POLLUTION KW - SW 3020:Sources and fate of pollution KW - M2 556.3:Groundwater Hydrology (556.3) UR - http://libproxy.lib.unc.edu/login?url=http://search.proquest.com/docview/19937315?accountid=14244 L2 - http://vb3lk7eb4t.search.serialssolutions.com/?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&rfr_id=info:sid/Pollution+Abstracts&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=report&rft.jtitle=&rft.atitle=&rft.au=&rft.aulast=&rft.aufirst=&rft.date=2000-09-11&rft.volume=&rft.issue=&rft.spage=&rft.isbn=&rft.btitle=NORTH+BANK+HABITAT+MANAGEMENT+AREA+AND+AREA+OF+CRITICAL+ENVIRONMENTAL+CONCERN%2C+DOUGLAS+COUNTY%2C+OREGON.&rft.title=NORTH+BANK+HABITAT+MANAGEMENT+AREA+AND+AREA+OF+CRITICAL+ENVIRONMENTAL+CONCERN%2C+DOUGLAS+COUNTY%2C+OREGON.&rft.issn=&rft_id=info:doi/ LA - English DB - ProQuest Environmental Science Collection N1 - Date revised - 2006-12-01 N1 - SuppNotes - Order this product from NTIS by: phone at 1-800-553-NTIS (U.S. customers); (703)605-6000 (other countries); fax at (703)605-6900; e-mail: orders[at]ntis.gov. NTIS Prices: AV A05; This document is color dependent and/or in landscape layout. It is currently only available on CD-ROM. N1 - Last updated - 2016-12-21 ER - TY - RPRT T1 - Geohydrology and Ground-Water Quality, Big Elk Creek Basin, Chester County, Pennsylvania, and Cecil County, Maryland AN - 19937265; 6261784 AB - This report presents and interprets groundwater quantity and quality data for the Big Elk Creek Basin in Chester County, Pa., and Cecil County, Md. The report focuses primarily on the Pennsylvania part of the basin. The report describes the geohydrology of aquifers in the basin and presents a summary of ground-water quality. Basin water budgets for the calendar years 1998 and 1999 are presented using streamflow data from the USGS streamflow-measurement station on Big Elk Creek and ground-water- level and precipitation data collected for this study. JF - Water Resources Investigations Report. United States Geological Survey AU - Sloto, R A Y1 - 2002///0, PY - 2002 DA - 0, 2002 SP - 92 PB - United States Geological Survey KW - Pollution Abstracts; ASFA 3: Aquatic Pollution & Environmental Quality; ASFA 2: Ocean Technology Policy & Non-Living Resources; Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts; Water Resources Abstracts KW - USGS-WRI-02-4057 KW - Aquifers KW - Catchment area KW - Precipitation data KW - Water reservoirs KW - USA, Pennsylvania, Big Elk Creek KW - Water Pollution Sources KW - Groundwater quality KW - Water budget KW - Rainfall KW - Hydrologic Budget KW - Basins KW - Groundwater Pollution KW - Groundwater Basins KW - water budget KW - Freshwater KW - Water quality KW - Flow rates KW - Ground water KW - Stream Pollution KW - Streamflow data KW - USA, Maryland KW - Hydrologic Data KW - Rivers KW - elk KW - Water Quality KW - River discharge KW - River basins KW - Precipitation KW - Stream flow KW - USA, Pennsylvania KW - Geohydrology KW - Groundwater KW - P 2000:FRESHWATER POLLUTION KW - SW 3020:Sources and fate of pollution KW - Q2 09171:Dynamics of lakes and rivers KW - Q5 08502:Methods and instruments KW - M2 556.3:Groundwater Hydrology (556.3) UR - http://libproxy.lib.unc.edu/login?url=http://search.proquest.com/docview/19937265?accountid=14244 L2 - http://vb3lk7eb4t.search.serialssolutions.com/?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&rfr_id=info:sid/Aquatic+Science+%26+Fisheries+Abstracts+%28ASFA%29+3%3A+Aquatic+Pollution+%26+Environmental+Quality&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=unknown&rft.jtitle=&rft.atitle=Remarks+of+Kevin+Gover%2C+Assistant+Secretary--Indian+Affairs%2C+Department+of+the+Interior%2C+at+the+Ceremony+Acknowledging+the+175th+Anniversary+of+the+Establishment+of+the+Bureau+of+Indian+Affairs.&rft.au=Gover%2C+Kevin&rft.aulast=Gover&rft.aufirst=Kevin&rft.date=2000-09-08&rft.volume=&rft.issue=&rft.spage=&rft.isbn=&rft.btitle=&rft.title=&rft.issn=&rft_id=info:doi/ LA - English DB - ProQuest Environmental Science Collection N1 - Date revised - 2006-09-01 N1 - SuppNotes - Product reproduced from digital image. Order this product from NTIS by: phone at 1-800-553-NTIS (U.S. customers); (703)605-6000 (other countries); fax at (703)605-6900; e-mail: orders[at]ntis.gov. NTIS Prices: PC A06/MF A01 N1 - Last updated - 2016-12-21 ER - TY - RPRT T1 - Pesticides in Surface Water of the Yakima River Basin, Washington, 1998-2000. Their Occurrence and an Assessment of Factors Affecting Concentrations and Loads AN - 19937186; 6261773 AB - The occurrence, distribution, and transport of pesticides in surface water of the Yakima River Basin were assessed using data collected during 1999-2000 as part of the U.S. Geological Survey National Water-Quality Assessment (NAWQA) Program. Samples were collected at 34 sites located throughout the basin in August 1999 using a Lagrangian sampling design. Samples also were collected weekly and monthly from May 1999 through January 2000 at three of the sites. This report includes data for 47 pesticide compounds from the analysis of filtered water using ocadecyl (C-18) solid- phase extraction and gas chromatography/ mass spectrometry. A total of 25 pesticide compounds were detected in samples collected during the study. Detection frequencies ranged from about 1 percent for ethalfluralin, ethoprophos, and lindane to 82 percent for atrazine. Maximum concentrations of azinphos-methyl, carbaryl, diazinon, para,para- dichlorodiphenyldichloroethylene (p,p-DDE), and lindane exceeded chronic-toxicity guidelines for the protection of freshwater aquatic life. Twenty pesticide compounds were detected during sampling in August 1999. Atrazine was the most widely detected herbicide, and azinphos-methyl was the most widely detected insecticide. The median number of sites at which a particular pesticide compound was detected was six. Pesticide compounds detected at more than six sites include malathion, and p,p-DDE. Because many factors affect the transport of pesticides from areas of application to surface water, there was not a simple correspondence between pesticide occurrence and use in the Yakima River Basin. JF - Water Resources Investigations Report. United States Geological Survey AU - Embrey, S S AU - Ebbert, J C Y1 - 2002///0, PY - 2002 DA - 0, 2002 PB - United States Geological Survey KW - Pollution Abstracts; ASFA 3: Aquatic Pollution & Environmental Quality; Water Resources Abstracts KW - USGS-WRI-01-4211 KW - Water Pollution KW - Aquatic organisms KW - water quality KW - River Basins KW - Water Sampling KW - Carbaryl KW - Basins KW - Surface Water KW - Freshwater KW - Water quality KW - Water analysis KW - Malathion KW - USA, Washington KW - Insecticides KW - Gas chromatography KW - Freshwater pollution KW - River basins KW - Pollution surveys KW - Mass Spectrometry KW - Water sampling KW - Water Analysis KW - Chromatographic techniques KW - Surface water KW - geological surveys KW - Mass spectrometry KW - Azinphos-methyl KW - Gas Chromatography KW - guidelines KW - USA, Washington, Yakima R. basin KW - Pollution detection KW - Lindane KW - Herbicides KW - Analytical Methods KW - Atrazine KW - Pesticides KW - Diazinon KW - P 2000:FRESHWATER POLLUTION KW - SW 3020:Sources and fate of pollution KW - Q5 08502:Methods and instruments UR - http://libproxy.lib.unc.edu/login?url=http://search.proquest.com/docview/19937186?accountid=14244 L2 - http://vb3lk7eb4t.search.serialssolutions.com/?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&rfr_id=info:sid/Aquatic+Science+%26+Fisheries+Abstracts+%28ASFA%29+3%3A+Aquatic+Pollution+%26+Environmental+Quality&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=report&rft.jtitle=&rft.atitle=&rft.au=Embrey%2C+S+S%3BEbbert%2C+J+C&rft.aulast=Embrey&rft.aufirst=S&rft.date=2002-01-01&rft.volume=&rft.issue=&rft.spage=&rft.isbn=&rft.btitle=Pesticides+in+Surface+Water+of+the+Yakima+River+Basin%2C+Washington%2C+1998-2000.+Their+Occurrence+and+an+Assessment+of+Factors+Affecting+Concentrations+and+Loads&rft.title=Pesticides+in+Surface+Water+of+the+Yakima+River+Basin%2C+Washington%2C+1998-2000.+Their+Occurrence+and+an+Assessment+of+Factors+Affecting+Concentrations+and+Loads&rft.issn=&rft_id=info:doi/ LA - English DB - ProQuest Environmental Science Collection N1 - Date revised - 2005-08-01 N1 - SuppNotes - Order this product from NTIS by: phone at 1-800-553-NTIS (U.S. customers); (703)605-6000 (other countries); fax at (703)605-6900; e-mail: orders[at]ntis.gov. NTIS Prices: AV A05 N1 - Last updated - 2016-12-21 ER - TY - RPRT T1 - Historical Contributions of Phosphorus from Natural and Agricultural Sources and Implications for Stream Water Quality, Cheney Reservoir Watershed, South-Central Kansas AN - 19937119; 6261764 AB - An examination of soil cores collected from 43 nonagricultural coring sites in the Cheney Reservoir watershed of south-central Kansas was conducted by the U.S. Geological Survey in September 1999. The cores were collected as part of an ongoing cooperative study with the city of Wichita, Kansas. The 43 sites (mostly cemeteries) were thought to have total phosphorus concentrations in the soil that are representative of natural conditions (unaffected by human activity). The purpose of this report is to present the analysis and evaluation of these soil cores, to quantify the phosphorus contributions to Cheney Reservoir from natural and agricultural sources, and to provide estimates of stream-water-quality response to natural concentrations of total phosphorus in the soil. JF - Water Resources Investigations Report. United States Geological Survey AU - Pope, L M AU - Milligan, C R AU - Mau, D P Y1 - 2002///0, PY - 2002 DA - 0, 2002 PB - United States Geological Survey KW - Pollution Abstracts; ASFA 3: Aquatic Pollution & Environmental Quality; Water Resources Abstracts KW - USGS-WRI-02-4021 KW - Water Pollution KW - water quality KW - Historical account KW - Agricultural Runoff KW - Water reservoirs KW - USA, Kansas, Wichita KW - Water Pollution Sources KW - geological surveys KW - Reservoir Sites KW - Phosphorus KW - Man-induced effects KW - Geological Surveys KW - Freshwater KW - Watersheds KW - Water quality KW - Streams KW - Soil KW - Cores KW - Reservoirs KW - cooperatives KW - Agricultural runoff KW - Urban areas KW - Pollution detection KW - Nonpoint Pollution Sources KW - Environmental impact KW - USA, Kansas KW - Water pollution KW - Fate KW - Geological surveys KW - Human factors KW - Water Resources KW - Q5 08503:Characteristics, behavior and fate KW - P 2000:FRESHWATER POLLUTION KW - SW 3020:Sources and fate of pollution UR - http://libproxy.lib.unc.edu/login?url=http://search.proquest.com/docview/19937119?accountid=14244 L2 - http://vb3lk7eb4t.search.serialssolutions.com/?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&rfr_id=info:sid/Aquatic+Science+%26+Fisheries+Abstracts+%28ASFA%29+3%3A+Aquatic+Pollution+%26+Environmental+Quality&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=report&rft.jtitle=&rft.atitle=&rft.au=Pope%2C+L+M%3BMilligan%2C+C+R%3BMau%2C+D+P&rft.aulast=Pope&rft.aufirst=L&rft.date=2002-01-01&rft.volume=&rft.issue=&rft.spage=&rft.isbn=&rft.btitle=Historical+Contributions+of+Phosphorus+from+Natural+and+Agricultural+Sources+and+Implications+for+Stream+Water+Quality%2C+Cheney+Reservoir+Watershed%2C+South-Central+Kansas&rft.title=Historical+Contributions+of+Phosphorus+from+Natural+and+Agricultural+Sources+and+Implications+for+Stream+Water+Quality%2C+Cheney+Reservoir+Watershed%2C+South-Central+Kansas&rft.issn=&rft_id=info:doi/ LA - English DB - ProQuest Environmental Science Collection N1 - Date revised - 2006-08-01 N1 - SuppNotes - Order this product from NTIS by: phone at 1-800-553-NTIS (U.S. customers); (703)605-6000 (other countries); fax at (703)605-6900; e-mail: orders[at]ntis.gov. NTIS Prices: AV A04; This document is color dependent and/or in landscape layout. It is currently only available on CD-ROM. Prepared in cooperation with City of Wichita, KS. N1 - Last updated - 2016-12-21 ER - TY - RPRT T1 - Arsenic Loads and Source Areas in and along Bear Creek, Park County, Montana, September 2000 AN - 19937079; 6261719 AB - This report quantifies arsenic loading to Bear Creek and identifies the principal source areas using the results of a tracer-injection and synoptic-sampling study conducted in Bear Creek during September 2000. Arsenic loads were calculated for mainstem sites along the approximately 3-mile long study reach by combining streamflow determined by tracer-injection methods with concentration data determined in synoptic water-quality samples. JF - Water Resources Investigations Report. United States Geological Survey AU - Thamke, J N AU - Wotan, T R AU - Nimick, DA Y1 - 2002///0, PY - 2002 DA - 0, 2002 SP - 36 PB - United States Geological Survey KW - Pollution Abstracts; Water Resources Abstracts KW - USGS-WRI-02-4074 KW - water quality KW - Arsenic KW - Water Pollution Sources KW - Pollution Load KW - Streamflow KW - Streams KW - Flow rates KW - Tracers KW - USA, Colorado, Denver, Bear Creek KW - bears KW - Hydrologic Data KW - USA, Montana KW - P 2000:FRESHWATER POLLUTION KW - SW 3020:Sources and fate of pollution UR - http://libproxy.lib.unc.edu/login?url=http://search.proquest.com/docview/19937079?accountid=14244 L2 - http://vb3lk7eb4t.search.serialssolutions.com/?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&rfr_id=info:sid/Pollution+Abstracts&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=report&rft.jtitle=&rft.atitle=&rft.au=Thamke%2C+J+N%3BWotan%2C+T+R%3BNimick%2C+DA&rft.aulast=Thamke&rft.aufirst=J&rft.date=2002-01-01&rft.volume=&rft.issue=&rft.spage=36&rft.isbn=&rft.btitle=Arsenic+Loads+and+Source+Areas+in+and+along+Bear+Creek%2C+Park+County%2C+Montana%2C+September+2000&rft.title=Arsenic+Loads+and+Source+Areas+in+and+along+Bear+Creek%2C+Park+County%2C+Montana%2C+September+2000&rft.issn=&rft_id=info:doi/ LA - English DB - ProQuest Environmental Science Collection N1 - Date revised - 2006-12-01 N1 - SuppNotes - Product reproduced from digital image. Order this product from NTIS by: phone at 1-800-553-NTIS (U.S. customers); (703)605-6000 (other countries); fax at (703)605-6900; e-mail: orders[at]ntis.gov. NTIS Prices: PC A04/MF A01; Prepared in cooperation with Forest Service, Missoula, MT. Region 1., Montana Environmental Quality Council, Helena. and Environmental Careers Organization, Novi, MI. N1 - Last updated - 2016-12-21 ER - TY - RPRT T1 - Water Resources Data for Virginia Water Year 2002. Volume 2: Ground-Water Level and Ground-Water Quality Records AN - 19936484; 7295058 AB - Water-resources data for the 2002 water year for Virginia consist of records of water levels and water quality of ground- water wells. This report (Volume 2. Ground-Water-Level and Ground- Water-Quality Records) contains water levels at 302 observation wells and water quality at 48 wells. Locations of these wells are shown on figures 4, 5, 6, 7 and 8. The data in this report represent that part of the National Water Data System collected by the U.S. Geological Survey and cooperating State and Federal agencies in Virginia. JF - Water Data Report. United States Geological Survey AU - White, R K AU - Powell, ED AU - Guyer, J R Y1 - 2002///0, PY - 2002 DA - 0, 2002 SP - 376 PB - United States Geological Survey KW - Pollution Abstracts; Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts; Water Resources Abstracts KW - USGS-WDR/VA-02-2 KW - Hydrology KW - Virginia KW - Ground water KW - Water quality KW - Water levels KW - Monitoring wells KW - Hydrologic data KW - Chemical analysis KW - Water temperatures KW - Discharge(Water) KW - Gaging stations KW - Sampling KW - Water analysis KW - Water table KW - Tables(Data) KW - water quality KW - Water resources data KW - geological surveys KW - Water Quality KW - Water resources KW - USA, Virginia KW - Water Resources Data KW - Groundwater Pollution KW - Water Level KW - Geological Surveys KW - Observation Wells KW - water levels KW - Water wells KW - Groundwater KW - P 2000:FRESHWATER POLLUTION KW - SW 3020:Sources and fate of pollution KW - M2 556.18:Water Management (556.18) UR - http://libproxy.lib.unc.edu/login?url=http://search.proquest.com/docview/19936484?accountid=14244 L2 - http://vb3lk7eb4t.search.serialssolutions.com/?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&rfr_id=info:sid/Pollution+Abstracts&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=report&rft.jtitle=&rft.atitle=&rft.au=White%2C+R+K%3BPowell%2C+ED%3BGuyer%2C+J+R&rft.aulast=White&rft.aufirst=R&rft.date=2002-01-01&rft.volume=&rft.issue=&rft.spage=376&rft.isbn=&rft.btitle=Water+Resources+Data+for+Virginia+Water+Year+2002.+Volume+2%3A+Ground-Water+Level+and+Ground-Water+Quality+Records&rft.title=Water+Resources+Data+for+Virginia+Water+Year+2002.+Volume+2%3A+Ground-Water+Level+and+Ground-Water+Quality+Records&rft.issn=&rft_id=info:doi/ LA - English DB - ProQuest Environmental Science Collection N1 - Date revised - 2007-04-01 N1 - SuppNotes - Product reproduced from digital image. Order this product from NTIS by: phone at 1-800-553-NTIS (U.S. customers); (703)605-6000 (other countries); fax at (703)605-6900; e-mail: orders[at]ntis.gov. NTIS Prices: PC A18/MF A03; See also PB2002-103090. Sponsored by Virginia Dept. of Environmental Quality, Charlottesville. Water Div. N1 - Last updated - 2016-05-27 ER - TY - RPRT T1 - Quality of Shallow Ground Water in Areas of Recent Residential and Commercial Development, Wichita, Kansas, 2000 AN - 19933008; 6261879 AB - Water samples from 30 randomly distributed monitoring wells in areas of recent residential and commercial development (1960 - 96), Wichita, Kansas, were collected in 2000 as part of the High Plains Regional Ground-Water Study conducted by the U.S. Geological Survey's National Water-Quality Assessment (NAWQA) Program. The samples were analyzed for about 170 water-quality constituents that included chlorofluorocarbons, physical properties, dissolved solids and major ions, nutrients and dissolved organic car-bon, trace elements, pesticide compounds, and volatile organic compounds. The purpose of this report is to provide an assessment of water quality in recharge to shallow ground water underlying areas of recent residential and commercial development and to determine the relation of ground-water quality to overlying urban land use. JF - Water Resources Investigations Report. United States Geological Survey AU - Pope, L M AU - Bruce, B W AU - Rasmussen, P P AU - Milligan, C R Y1 - 2002///0, PY - 2002 DA - 0, 2002 PB - United States Geological Survey KW - Pollution Abstracts; Water Resources Abstracts KW - USGS-WRI-02-4228 KW - Dissolved Solids KW - water quality KW - Urbanization KW - Water sampling KW - USA, Kansas, Wichita KW - Water Analysis KW - Water Pollution Sources KW - Water Sampling KW - Groundwater Pollution KW - Nutrients KW - USA, Wyoming, High Plains KW - Trace elements KW - Chlorofluorocarbons KW - Assessments KW - Physical Properties KW - Dissolved solids KW - Geology KW - plains KW - Urban areas KW - Ions KW - Fate of Pollutants KW - USA, Kansas KW - nutrients KW - Pesticides KW - Water wells KW - Groundwater KW - Groundwater Recharge KW - Volatile organic compounds KW - P 2000:FRESHWATER POLLUTION KW - SW 3020:Sources and fate of pollution UR - http://libproxy.lib.unc.edu/login?url=http://search.proquest.com/docview/19933008?accountid=14244 L2 - http://vb3lk7eb4t.search.serialssolutions.com/?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&rfr_id=info:sid/Pollution+Abstracts&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=report&rft.jtitle=&rft.atitle=&rft.au=Pope%2C+L+M%3BBruce%2C+B+W%3BRasmussen%2C+P+P%3BMilligan%2C+C+R&rft.aulast=Pope&rft.aufirst=L&rft.date=2002-01-01&rft.volume=&rft.issue=&rft.spage=&rft.isbn=&rft.btitle=Quality+of+Shallow+Ground+Water+in+Areas+of+Recent+Residential+and+Commercial+Development%2C+Wichita%2C+Kansas%2C+2000&rft.title=Quality+of+Shallow+Ground+Water+in+Areas+of+Recent+Residential+and+Commercial+Development%2C+Wichita%2C+Kansas%2C+2000&rft.issn=&rft_id=info:doi/ LA - English DB - ProQuest Environmental Science Collection N1 - Date revised - 2006-09-01 N1 - SuppNotes - Order this product from NTIS by: phone at 1-800-553-NTIS (U.S. customers); (703)605-6000 (other countries); fax at (703)605-6900; e-mail: orders[at]ntis.gov. NTIS Prices: AV A06; This document is color dependent and/or in landscape layout. It is currently available on CD-ROM and paper only. N1 - Last updated - 2016-12-21 ER - TY - RPRT T1 - Environmental Characteristics and Geographic Information System Applications for the Development of Nutrient Thresholds in Oklahoma Streams AN - 19932908; 6261816 AB - The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency has developed nutrient criteria using ecoregions to manage and protect rivers and streams in the United States. Individual states and tribes are encouraged by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency to modify or improve upon the ecoregion approach. The Oklahoma Water Resources Board uses a dichotomous process that stratifies streams using environmental characteristics such as stream order and stream slope. This process is called the Use Support Assessment Protocols, subchapter 15. The Use Support Assessment Protocols can be used to identify streams threatened by excessive amounts of nutrients, dependent upon a beneficial use designation for each stream. The Use Support Assessment Protocols, subchapter 15 uses nutrient and environmental characteristic thresholds developed from a study conducted in the Netherlands, but the Oklahoma Water Resources Board wants to modify the thresholds to reflect hydrologic and ecological conditions relevant to Oklahoma streams and rivers. JF - Water Resources Investigations Report. United States Geological Survey AU - Masoner, J R AU - Haggard, B E AU - Rea, A Y1 - 2002///0, PY - 2002 DA - 0, 2002 SP - 52 PB - United States Geological Survey KW - Pollution Abstracts; ASFA 3: Aquatic Pollution & Environmental Quality; ASFA 2: Ocean Technology Policy & Non-Living Resources; Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts; Water Resources Abstracts KW - USGS-WRI-02-4191 KW - Water sampling KW - Remote sensing KW - Water resources KW - Nutrients KW - Freshwater KW - Water quality KW - Streams KW - USA, Oklahoma KW - Assessments KW - Geographic Information Systems (GIS) KW - Netherlands KW - Geographical Information Systems KW - Rivers KW - Environmental assessment KW - Water Quality KW - Environmental Protection KW - Stream Order KW - Environmental legislation KW - Environmental protection KW - Water pollution KW - EPA KW - Ecological conditions KW - Water management KW - Geographic information systems KW - Nutrients (mineral) KW - GIS KW - Water Resources KW - M2 556.53:Rivers, Streams, Canals (556.53) KW - P 2000:FRESHWATER POLLUTION KW - SW 3020:Sources and fate of pollution KW - Q2 09171:Dynamics of lakes and rivers KW - Q5 08502:Methods and instruments UR - http://libproxy.lib.unc.edu/login?url=http://search.proquest.com/docview/19932908?accountid=14244 L2 - http://vb3lk7eb4t.search.serialssolutions.com/?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&rfr_id=info:sid/Aquatic+Science+%26+Fisheries+Abstracts+%28ASFA%29+3%3A+Aquatic+Pollution+%26+Environmental+Quality&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.jtitle=USGS+Fact+Sheet+114-00&rft.atitle=Monitoring+the+Effectiveness+of+Urban+Best+Management+Practices+in+Improving+Water+Quality+of+Engelsby+Brook%2C+Burlington%2C+Vermont&rft.au=&rft.aulast=&rft.aufirst=&rft.date=2000-09-01&rft.volume=&rft.issue=&rft.spage=&rft.isbn=&rft.btitle=&rft.title=USGS+Fact+Sheet+114-00&rft.issn=&rft_id=info:doi/ LA - English DB - ProQuest Environmental Science Collection N1 - Date revised - 2006-09-01 N1 - SuppNotes - Product reproduced from digital image. Order this product from NTIS by: phone at 1-800-553-NTIS (U.S. customers); (703)605-6000 (other countries); fax at (703)605-6900; e-mail: orders[at]ntis.gov. NTIS Prices: PC A05/MF A01; Prepared in cooperation with Agricultural Research Service, Washington, DC. N1 - Last updated - 2016-12-21 ER - TY - RPRT T1 - Attenuation of Runoff and Chemical Loads in Grass Filter Strips at Two Cattle Feedlots, Minnesota, 1995-98 AN - 19932624; 6261892 AB - Attenuation of cattle feedlot runoff in two grass-covered filter strips in Minnesota was estimated by measuring chemical loads into and out of the strips. Filter strips of the Bock and Sanborn sites were 60-m long and 20-m wide and received run-off from cattle feedlots that supported 35 and 225 cattle, respectively. Feedlot and filter-strip runoff were measured using flumes with stage sensors. Water samples were collected using automated samplers. Attenuation values were calculated from four storm-runoff events. Ground water sampled beneath and outside the filter strips indicated some infiltration losses of sulfate, chloride, and nitrogen at the Bock site where soil permeability was greater than at the Sanborn site. Chemical constituents in the filter-strip runoff, and their corresponding ranges of attenuation were as follows: chemical oxygen demand, 30-81 percent; dissolved chloride, 6-79 percent; dissolved sulfate, 3-82 percent; dissolved ammonia nitrogen, 33-80 percent; suspended ammonia plus organic nitrogen, 29-85 percent; dissolved organic nitrogen, 14-75 percent; suspended phosphorus, 24-82 percent; dissolved phosphorus, 14-72 percent; and fecal coliform bacteria, 18-79 percent. The ranges seem to be affected by barriers of direct contact of the runoff water with the soil. This varies seasonally by coverage of the soil by ice in winter and vegetation in summer months. Greater attenuation values occurred in October and May when mats of wilted, flat-lying grass covered the filter strips; attenuation values were less during the summer when tall growing grass covered the filter strips. JF - Water Resources Investigations Report. United States Geological Survey AU - Komor, S C AU - Hansen, D S Y1 - 2002///0, PY - 2002 DA - 0, 2002 SP - 24 PB - United States Geological Survey KW - natural attenuation KW - Pollution Abstracts; Water Resources Abstracts KW - USGS-WRI-03-4036 KW - Sulfates KW - dissolved organic phosphorus KW - Water sampling KW - Sensors KW - Grasses KW - Phosphorus KW - Chlorides KW - Feedlots KW - Soil KW - Water Pollution Prevention KW - organic nitrogen KW - Fecal coliforms KW - Water Pollution Treatment KW - Ammonia KW - Vegetation KW - Chemical oxygen demand KW - soil permeability KW - USA, Minnesota KW - Filters KW - Cattle KW - Infiltration KW - summer KW - Groundwater KW - Runoff KW - Nitrogen KW - P 2000:FRESHWATER POLLUTION KW - SW 3020:Sources and fate of pollution UR - http://libproxy.lib.unc.edu/login?url=http://search.proquest.com/docview/19932624?accountid=14244 L2 - http://vb3lk7eb4t.search.serialssolutions.com/?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&rfr_id=info:sid/Pollution+Abstracts&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=report&rft.jtitle=&rft.atitle=&rft.au=Komor%2C+S+C%3BHansen%2C+D+S&rft.aulast=Komor&rft.aufirst=S&rft.date=2002-01-01&rft.volume=&rft.issue=&rft.spage=24&rft.isbn=&rft.btitle=Attenuation+of+Runoff+and+Chemical+Loads+in+Grass+Filter+Strips+at+Two+Cattle+Feedlots%2C+Minnesota%2C+1995-98&rft.title=Attenuation+of+Runoff+and+Chemical+Loads+in+Grass+Filter+Strips+at+Two+Cattle+Feedlots%2C+Minnesota%2C+1995-98&rft.issn=&rft_id=info:doi/ LA - English DB - ProQuest Environmental Science Collection N1 - Date revised - 2006-09-01 N1 - SuppNotes - Product reproduced from digital image. Order this product from NTIS by: phone at 1-800-553-NTIS (U.S. customers); (703)605-6000 (other countries); fax at (703)605-6900; e-mail: orders[at]ntis.gov. NTIS Prices: PC A03/MF A01; Prepared in cooperation with Minnesota Pollution Control Agency, St. Paul. N1 - Last updated - 2016-12-21 ER - TY - RPRT T1 - Use of Isotopes to Identify Sources of Ground Water, Estimate Ground-Water-Flow Rates, and Assess Aquifer Vulnerability in the Calumet Region of Northwestern Indiana and Northeastern Illinois AN - 19932593; 6261861 AB - This report describes the results of an investigation designed to characterize ground-water recharge and flow rates and vulnerability of the aquifers to contamination in a heavily industrialized area of northwestern Indiana and northeastern Illinois. Water samples were collected from a well network distributed across northwestern Indiana and northeastern Illinois. Samples were collected from 26 wells during July 1997 and from 21 different wells and Lake Michigan between January 2000 and April 2001. Thirty-six of the sampled wells were screened in unconsolidated deposits and 16 were finished in bedrock. Samples were analyzed for concentrations of tritium and helium and isotopic abundances of oxygen and hydrogen. Absolute and relative ages of ground water, computed from sample results, were used to address project objectives. JF - Water Resources Investigations Report. United States Geological Survey AU - Kay, R T AU - Bayless, E R AU - Solak, R A Y1 - 2002///0, PY - 2002 DA - 0, 2002 SP - 74 PB - United States Geological Survey KW - Pollution Abstracts; Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts; Water Resources Abstracts KW - USGS-WRI-02-4213 KW - Aquifers KW - Isotopes KW - Water sampling KW - Water Analysis KW - Groundwater Pollution KW - Hydrogen KW - Flow rates KW - Lakes KW - Flow Rates KW - USA, Michigan, Calumet KW - absolute age KW - Vulnerability KW - Aquifer flow KW - USA, Illinois KW - Well Data KW - USA, Indiana KW - Oxygen KW - USA, Michigan L. KW - Tritium KW - Isotopic Tracers KW - Water wells KW - Helium KW - Groundwater pollution KW - vulnerability KW - Groundwater KW - Groundwater Recharge KW - Groundwater Movement KW - M2 556:General (556) KW - P 2000:FRESHWATER POLLUTION KW - SW 0840:Groundwater UR - http://libproxy.lib.unc.edu/login?url=http://search.proquest.com/docview/19932593?accountid=14244 L2 - http://vb3lk7eb4t.search.serialssolutions.com/?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&rfr_id=info:sid/Pollution+Abstracts&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=report&rft.jtitle=&rft.atitle=&rft.au=Kay%2C+R+T%3BBayless%2C+E+R%3BSolak%2C+R+A&rft.aulast=Kay&rft.aufirst=R&rft.date=2002-01-01&rft.volume=&rft.issue=&rft.spage=74&rft.isbn=&rft.btitle=Use+of+Isotopes+to+Identify+Sources+of+Ground+Water%2C+Estimate+Ground-Water-Flow+Rates%2C+and+Assess+Aquifer+Vulnerability+in+the+Calumet+Region+of+Northwestern+Indiana+and+Northeastern+Illinois&rft.title=Use+of+Isotopes+to+Identify+Sources+of+Ground+Water%2C+Estimate+Ground-Water-Flow+Rates%2C+and+Assess+Aquifer+Vulnerability+in+the+Calumet+Region+of+Northwestern+Indiana+and+Northeastern+Illinois&rft.issn=&rft_id=info:doi/ LA - English DB - ProQuest Environmental Science Collection N1 - Date revised - 2006-12-01 N1 - SuppNotes - Product reproduced from digital image. Order this product from NTIS by: phone at 1-800-553-NTIS (U.S. customers); (703)605-6000 (other countries); fax at (703)605-6900; e-mail: orders[at]ntis.gov. NTIS Prices: PC A05/MF A01; Prepared in cooperation with Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. N1 - Last updated - 2016-12-21 ER - TY - RPRT T1 - Water Quality in the Little Sac River Basin near Springfield, Missouri, 1999-2001 AN - 19932138; 6261814 AB - The Little Sac River, north of Springfield, Missouri, flows through mainly agricultural and forest land. However, the quality of the river water is a concern because the river flows into Stockton Lake, which is a supplemental drinking water source for Springfield. Larch bacterial densities and nutrient concentrations are primary concerns to the water quality of the river. JF - Water Resources Investigations Report. United States Geological Survey AU - Smith, B J Y1 - 2002///0, PY - 2002 DA - 0, 2002 PB - United States Geological Survey KW - Microbiology Abstracts B: Bacteriology; Pollution Abstracts; ASFA 3: Aquatic Pollution & Environmental Quality; Water Resources Abstracts KW - USGS-WRI-02-4154 KW - water quality KW - River Basins KW - USA, Missouri, Stockton L. KW - Water Pollution Sources KW - nutrient concentrations KW - Forests KW - Water resources KW - Nutrients KW - Freshwater KW - Water quality KW - Lakes KW - Drinking Water KW - USA, Missouri, Little Sac R. KW - Larix KW - USA, Missouri KW - River Flow KW - Freshwater pollution KW - Rivers KW - Bacteria KW - Water Quality KW - River basins KW - Land use KW - River water KW - Drinking water KW - Nutrient concentrations KW - Water Resources KW - Q5 08503:Characteristics, behavior and fate KW - P 2000:FRESHWATER POLLUTION KW - SW 3020:Sources and fate of pollution KW - J 02450:Ecology UR - http://libproxy.lib.unc.edu/login?url=http://search.proquest.com/docview/19932138?accountid=14244 L2 - http://vb3lk7eb4t.search.serialssolutions.com/?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&rfr_id=info:sid/Aquatic+Science+%26+Fisheries+Abstracts+%28ASFA%29+3%3A+Aquatic+Pollution+%26+Environmental+Quality&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=report&rft.jtitle=&rft.atitle=&rft.au=Smith%2C+B+J&rft.aulast=Smith&rft.aufirst=B&rft.date=2002-01-01&rft.volume=&rft.issue=&rft.spage=&rft.isbn=&rft.btitle=Water+Quality+in+the+Little+Sac+River+Basin+near+Springfield%2C+Missouri%2C+1999-2001&rft.title=Water+Quality+in+the+Little+Sac+River+Basin+near+Springfield%2C+Missouri%2C+1999-2001&rft.issn=&rft_id=info:doi/ LA - English DB - ProQuest Environmental Science Collection N1 - Date revised - 2005-08-01 N1 - SuppNotes - Order this product from NTIS by: phone at 1-800-553-NTIS (U.S. customers); (703)605-6000 (other countries); fax at (703)605-6900; e-mail: orders[at]ntis.gov. NTIS Prices: AV A05; This document is color dependent and/or in landscape layout. It is currently only available on CD-ROM. N1 - Last updated - 2016-12-21 ER - TY - RPRT T1 - Preliminary Estimates of Spatially Distributed Net Infiltration and Recharge for the Death Valley Region, Nevada- California AN - 19932083; 6261808 AB - A three-dimensional ground-water flow model has been developed to evaluate the Death Valley regional flow system, which includes ground water beneath the Nevada Test Site. Estimates of spatially distributed net infiltration and recharge are needed to define upper boundary conditions. This study presents a preliminary application of a conceptual and numerical model of net infiltration. The model was developed in studies at Yucca Mountain, Nevada, which is located in the approximate center of the Death Valley ground-water flow system. The conceptual model describes the effects of precipitation, runoff, evapotranspiration, and redistribution of water in the shallow unsaturated zone on predicted rates of net infiltration; precipitation and soil depth are the two most significant variables. The conceptual model was tested using a preliminary numerical model based on energy- and water-balance calculations. Daily precipitation for 1980 through 1995, averaging 202 millimeters per year over the 39,556 square kilometers area of the ground-water flow model, was input to the numerical model to simulate net infiltration ranging from zero for a soil thickness greater than 6 meters to over 350 millimeters per year for thin soils at high elevations in the Spring Mountains overlying permeable bedrock. Estimated average net infiltration over the entire ground-water flow model domain is 7.8 millimeters per year. To evaluate the application of the net-infiltration model developed on a local scale at Yucca Mountain, to net-infiltration estimates representing the magnitude and distribution of recharge on a regional scale, the net-infiltration results were compared with recharge estimates obtained using empirical methods. Comparison of model results with previous estimates of basinwide recharge suggests that the net-infiltration estimates obtained using this model may overestimate recharge because of uncertainty in modeled precipitation, bedrock permeability, and soil properties for locations such as the Spring Mountains. Although this model is preliminary and uncalibrated, it provides a first approximation of the spatial distribution of net infiltration for the Death Valley region under current climatic conditions. JF - Water Resources Investigations Report. United States Geological Survey AU - Hevesi, JA AU - Flint, AL AU - Flint, LE Y1 - 2002///0, PY - 2002 DA - 0, 2002 PB - United States Geological Survey KW - Pollution Abstracts; Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts; Water Resources Abstracts KW - USGS-WRI-02-4010 KW - Groundwater hydrology KW - USA, Nevada, Yucca Mt. KW - Spatial distribution KW - Rainfall KW - climatic conditions KW - USA, Nevada KW - Spatial Distribution KW - Boundary conditions KW - Climatic conditions KW - USA, California, Death Valley KW - Mountains KW - Soil KW - spatial distribution KW - soil depth KW - Permeability KW - Numerical models KW - soil properties KW - Soil properties KW - USA, California KW - Daily precipitation KW - Groundwater Management KW - Mortality KW - Mathematical models KW - valleys KW - Groundwater flow KW - Evapotranspiration KW - Precipitation KW - boundary conditions KW - Groundwater flow models KW - Aquifer recharge KW - Infiltration KW - Groundwater pollution KW - Groundwater KW - Groundwater Recharge KW - Groundwater Movement KW - P 2000:FRESHWATER POLLUTION KW - SW 0840:Groundwater KW - M2 556.3:Groundwater Hydrology (556.3) UR - http://libproxy.lib.unc.edu/login?url=http://search.proquest.com/docview/19932083?accountid=14244 L2 - http://vb3lk7eb4t.search.serialssolutions.com/?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&rfr_id=info:sid/Pollution+Abstracts&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=report&rft.jtitle=&rft.atitle=&rft.au=Hevesi%2C+JA%3BFlint%2C+AL%3BFlint%2C+LE&rft.aulast=Hevesi&rft.aufirst=JA&rft.date=2002-01-01&rft.volume=&rft.issue=&rft.spage=&rft.isbn=&rft.btitle=Preliminary+Estimates+of+Spatially+Distributed+Net+Infiltration+and+Recharge+for+the+Death+Valley+Region%2C+Nevada-+California&rft.title=Preliminary+Estimates+of+Spatially+Distributed+Net+Infiltration+and+Recharge+for+the+Death+Valley+Region%2C+Nevada-+California&rft.issn=&rft_id=info:doi/ LA - English DB - ProQuest Environmental Science Collection N1 - Date revised - 2006-12-01 N1 - SuppNotes - Order this product from NTIS by: phone at 1-800-553-NTIS (U.S. customers); (703)605-6000 (other countries); fax at (703)605-6900; e-mail: orders[at]ntis.gov. NTIS Prices: AV A04; This document is color dependent and/or in landscape layout. It is currently only available on CD-ROM. Prepared in cooperation with Department of Energy, Las Vegas, NV. Nevada Operations Office. N1 - Last updated - 2016-12-21 ER - TY - RPRT T1 - Concentrations of Escherichia coli in Streams in the Ohio River Watershed in Indiana, May-August 2000 AN - 19931996; 6261797 AB - Water samples collected from 40 stream sites in the Ohio River Watershed in Indiana from May through August 2000 were analyzed for concentrations of Escherichia coli (E. coli) bacteria. Each site was sampled five times in a 30-day period. Concentrations of E. coli in 72 of the 200 samples exceeded the State of Indiana single-sample standard of 235 colonies per 100 milliliters for waters used for recreation. A five-sample geometric mean of concentrations was computed for each site. Concentrations in samples from 24 of the 40 sites exceeded the State of Indiana standard for a five-sample geometric mean of 125 colonies per 100 milliliters for waters used for recreation. Samples collected from 34 sites had E. coli concentrations that exceeded either or both the single-sample standard and the five sample geometric mean standard. JF - Water Resources Investigations Report. United States Geological Survey AU - Silcox, CA AU - Robinson, BA Y1 - 2002///0, PY - 2002 DA - 0, 2002 SP - 56 PB - United States Geological Survey KW - Pollution Abstracts; Microbiology Abstracts B: Bacteriology; ASFA 3: Aquatic Pollution & Environmental Quality; Water Resources Abstracts KW - USGS-WRI-02-4064 KW - Pollution monitoring KW - Water sampling KW - Water Pollution Sources KW - Water Analysis KW - Water resources KW - Freshwater KW - Watersheds KW - Streams KW - Public health KW - Water Quality Standards KW - Colonies KW - Escherichia coli KW - Stream Pollution KW - USA, Ohio R. KW - Rivers KW - Bacteria KW - Water pollution KW - USA, Indiana KW - Escherichia Coli KW - Recreation KW - Water management KW - USA, Kentucky, Ohio R. KW - P 2000:FRESHWATER POLLUTION KW - SW 3020:Sources and fate of pollution KW - J 02320:Cell Biology KW - Q5 08502:Methods and instruments UR - http://libproxy.lib.unc.edu/login?url=http://search.proquest.com/docview/19931996?accountid=14244 L2 - http://vb3lk7eb4t.search.serialssolutions.com/?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&rfr_id=info:sid/Aquatic+Science+%26+Fisheries+Abstracts+%28ASFA%29+3%3A+Aquatic+Pollution+%26+Environmental+Quality&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=report&rft.jtitle=&rft.atitle=&rft.au=Silcox%2C+CA%3BRobinson%2C+BA&rft.aulast=Silcox&rft.aufirst=CA&rft.date=2002-01-01&rft.volume=&rft.issue=&rft.spage=56&rft.isbn=&rft.btitle=Concentrations+of+Escherichia+coli+in+Streams+in+the+Ohio+River+Watershed+in+Indiana%2C+May-August+2000&rft.title=Concentrations+of+Escherichia+coli+in+Streams+in+the+Ohio+River+Watershed+in+Indiana%2C+May-August+2000&rft.issn=&rft_id=info:doi/ LA - English DB - ProQuest Environmental Science Collection N1 - Date revised - 2006-09-01 N1 - SuppNotes - Product reproduced from digital image. Order this product from NTIS by: phone at 1-800-553-NTIS (U.S. customers); (703)605-6000 (other countries); fax at (703)605-6900; e-mail: orders[at]ntis.gov. NTIS Prices: PC A05/MF A01; Prepared in cooperation with Indiana Dept. of Environmental Management, Indianapolis. N1 - Last updated - 2016-12-21 ER - TY - RPRT T1 - Sources of Metal Loads to the Alamosa River and Estimation of Seasonal and Annual Metal Loads for the Alamosa River Basin, Colorado, 1995-97 AN - 19931928; 6261791 AB - Metal contamination in the upper Alamosa River Basin has occurred for decades from the Summitville Mine site, from other smaller mines, and from natural, metal-enriched acidic drainage in the basin. In 1995, the need to quantify contamination from various source areas in the basin and to quantify the spatial, seasonal, and annual metal loads in the basin was identified. Data collection occurred from 1995 through 1997 at numerous sites to address data gaps. Metal loads were calculated and the percentages of metal load contributions from tributaries to three risk exposure areas were determined. Additionally, a modified time- interval method was used to estimate seasonal and annual metal loads in the Alamosa River and Wightman Fork. JF - Water Resources Investigations Report. United States Geological Survey AU - Ortiz, R AU - Edelmann, P AU - Ferguson, S AU - Stogner, R Y1 - 2002///0, PY - 2002 DA - 0, 2002 SP - 60 PB - United States Geological Survey KW - Pollution Abstracts; ASFA 3: Aquatic Pollution & Environmental Quality; Water Resources Abstracts KW - USGS-WRI-02-4128 KW - Metals KW - River Basins KW - Data collection KW - Contamination KW - Water Pollution Sources KW - Heavy metals KW - Acid Mine Drainage KW - Catchment Areas KW - Pollution Load KW - Basins KW - River basins KW - Data collections KW - Freshwater KW - Mines KW - USA, Colorado KW - Sulfur dioxide KW - Mine Wastes KW - Mining KW - Seasonal variations KW - Pollution data KW - Data Collections KW - Q5 08503:Characteristics, behavior and fate KW - P 2000:FRESHWATER POLLUTION KW - SW 3020:Sources and fate of pollution UR - http://libproxy.lib.unc.edu/login?url=http://search.proquest.com/docview/19931928?accountid=14244 L2 - http://vb3lk7eb4t.search.serialssolutions.com/?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&rfr_id=info:sid/Aquatic+Science+%26+Fisheries+Abstracts+%28ASFA%29+3%3A+Aquatic+Pollution+%26+Environmental+Quality&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=report&rft.jtitle=&rft.atitle=&rft.au=Ortiz%2C+R%3BEdelmann%2C+P%3BFerguson%2C+S%3BStogner%2C+R&rft.aulast=Ortiz&rft.aufirst=R&rft.date=2002-01-01&rft.volume=&rft.issue=&rft.spage=60&rft.isbn=&rft.btitle=Sources+of+Metal+Loads+to+the+Alamosa+River+and+Estimation+of+Seasonal+and+Annual+Metal+Loads+for+the+Alamosa+River+Basin%2C+Colorado%2C+1995-97&rft.title=Sources+of+Metal+Loads+to+the+Alamosa+River+and+Estimation+of+Seasonal+and+Annual+Metal+Loads+for+the+Alamosa+River+Basin%2C+Colorado%2C+1995-97&rft.issn=&rft_id=info:doi/ LA - English DB - ProQuest Environmental Science Collection N1 - Date revised - 2005-08-01 N1 - SuppNotes - Product reproduced from digital image. Order this product from NTIS by: phone at 1-800-553-NTIS (U.S. customers); (703)605-6000 (other countries); fax at (703)605-6900; e-mail: orders[at]ntis.gov. NTIS Prices: PC A05/MF A01 N1 - Last updated - 2016-12-21 ER - TY - RPRT T1 - Hydrology and Water Quality of Geneva Lake, Walworth County, Wisconsin AN - 19931857; 6261778 AB - As part of continuing efforts to improve the water quality of Geneva Lake, a collaborative effort between the U.S. Geological Survey, the Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources, and the Geneva Lake Environmental Agency was initiated in 1997 to document the present quality of the lake and its sediments, compute detailed hydrologic and nutrient (primarily phosphorus) budgets for the lake, estimate how changes in nutrient loading may affect water quality, and describe changes in the lake over the past 170 years by comparing water quality measured in this study with historical measurements and sediment-core information. This report presents the results of this collaborative study. JF - Water Resources Investigations Report. United States Geological Survey AU - Robertson, D M AU - Goddard, G L AU - Mergener, E A AU - Rose, W J AU - Garrison, P J Y1 - 2002///0, PY - 2002 DA - 0, 2002 PB - United States Geological Survey KW - Pollution Abstracts; ASFA 2: Ocean Technology Policy & Non-Living Resources; ASFA 3: Aquatic Pollution & Environmental Quality; Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts; Water Resources Abstracts KW - USGS-WRI-02-4039 KW - water quality KW - Historical account KW - Report literature KW - Water Analysis KW - Water Pollution Sources KW - geological surveys KW - Nutrient loading KW - Phosphorus KW - Nutrients KW - Europe, Leman L. KW - Freshwater KW - USA, Wisconsin KW - Water quality KW - Natural Resources KW - Lakes KW - Hydrology KW - Sediment transport KW - Transport processes KW - budgets KW - Environmental monitoring KW - Sediment pollution KW - Water Quality KW - Pollution Load KW - USA, Wisconsin, Geneva L. KW - Sediments KW - Natural resources KW - Lake sediment core analysis KW - Nutrients (mineral) KW - Sediment load KW - Monitoring KW - Water Resources KW - M2 556.55:Lakes, Reservoirs, Ponds (556.55) KW - P 2000:FRESHWATER POLLUTION KW - SW 3020:Sources and fate of pollution KW - Q2 09171:Dynamics of lakes and rivers KW - Q5 08502:Methods and instruments UR - http://libproxy.lib.unc.edu/login?url=http://search.proquest.com/docview/19931857?accountid=14244 L2 - http://vb3lk7eb4t.search.serialssolutions.com/?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&rfr_id=info:sid/Aquatic+Science+%26+Fisheries+Abstracts+%28ASFA%29+3%3A+Aquatic+Pollution+%26+Environmental+Quality&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=report&rft.jtitle=&rft.atitle=&rft.au=Robertson%2C+D+M%3BGoddard%2C+G+L%3BMergener%2C+E+A%3BRose%2C+W+J%3BGarrison%2C+P+J&rft.aulast=Robertson&rft.aufirst=D&rft.date=2002-01-01&rft.volume=&rft.issue=&rft.spage=&rft.isbn=&rft.btitle=Hydrology+and+Water+Quality+of+Geneva+Lake%2C+Walworth+County%2C+Wisconsin&rft.title=Hydrology+and+Water+Quality+of+Geneva+Lake%2C+Walworth+County%2C+Wisconsin&rft.issn=&rft_id=info:doi/ LA - English DB - ProQuest Environmental Science Collection N1 - Date revised - 2006-09-01 N1 - SuppNotes - Available on CD-ROM and in paper copy only. Order this product from NTIS by: phone at 1-800-553-NTIS (U.S. customers); (703)605- 6000 (other countries); fax at (703)605-6900; e-mail: orders[at]ntis.gov. NTIS Prices: AV A06; This document is color dependent and/or in landscape layout. It is currently only available on CD-ROM. N1 - Last updated - 2016-12-21 ER - TY - RPRT T1 - Geohydrology, Water Quality, and Simulation of Ground-Water Flow in the Vicinity of a Former Waste-Oil Refinery near Westville, Indiana, 1997-2000 AN - 19931821; 6261755 AB - Geohydrologic and water-quality data collected during 1997 through 2000 in the vicinity of a former waste-oil refinery near Westville, Indiana, define a plume of 1,4-dioxane in ground water that extends to the southwest approximately 0.8 miles from the refinery site. Concentrations of 1,4-dioxane in the plume ranged from 3 to 31,000 micrograms per liter. Ground water containing 1,4- dioxane is discharged to Crumpacker Ditch, approximately one-half mile west of the refinery site. Concentrations of 1,4-dioxane detected in surface water ranged from 8 to 140 micrograms per liter; 1,4-dioxane also is transported in ground water beneath the ditch. The study area is underlain by glacial deposits of sand and gravel that overlie lacustrine clay and shale. The sand and gravel deposits form an extensive aquifer ranging from 148 to 215 feet thick in the study area. Ground water generally flows from northeast to southwest and the depth to water ranges from about 3 to 36 feet below land surface. The average horizontal hydraulic conductivity of the aquifer, determined from a multiple-well aquifer test, was 121 feet per day, and the transmissivity was 18,600 feet squared per day. JF - Water Resources Investigations Report. United States Geological Survey AU - Duwelius, R F AU - Yeskis, D J AU - Wilson, J T AU - Robinson, BA Y1 - 2002///0, PY - 2002 DA - 0, 2002 SP - 174 PB - United States Geological Survey KW - Pollution Abstracts; Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts; Water Resources Abstracts KW - USGS-WRI-01-4221 KW - Aquifers KW - Hydraulic conductivity KW - water quality KW - Hydraulics KW - Path of Pollutants KW - Surface water KW - Groundwater quality KW - Groundwater Pollution KW - Refineries KW - Water quality KW - Permeability Coefficient KW - Sand KW - Glacial deposits KW - Plumes KW - Clay KW - Simulation KW - Transmissivity KW - USA, Indiana KW - Oil Refineries KW - Numerical simulations KW - Aquifer Testing KW - Geohydrology KW - Groundwater KW - Groundwater Movement KW - P 2000:FRESHWATER POLLUTION KW - SW 3020:Sources and fate of pollution KW - M2 556.3:Groundwater Hydrology (556.3) UR - http://libproxy.lib.unc.edu/login?url=http://search.proquest.com/docview/19931821?accountid=14244 L2 - http://vb3lk7eb4t.search.serialssolutions.com/?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&rfr_id=info:sid/Pollution+Abstracts&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=report&rft.jtitle=&rft.atitle=&rft.au=Duwelius%2C+R+F%3BYeskis%2C+D+J%3BWilson%2C+J+T%3BRobinson%2C+BA&rft.aulast=Duwelius&rft.aufirst=R&rft.date=2002-01-01&rft.volume=&rft.issue=&rft.spage=174&rft.isbn=&rft.btitle=Geohydrology%2C+Water+Quality%2C+and+Simulation+of+Ground-Water+Flow+in+the+Vicinity+of+a+Former+Waste-Oil+Refinery+near+Westville%2C+Indiana%2C+1997-2000&rft.title=Geohydrology%2C+Water+Quality%2C+and+Simulation+of+Ground-Water+Flow+in+the+Vicinity+of+a+Former+Waste-Oil+Refinery+near+Westville%2C+Indiana%2C+1997-2000&rft.issn=&rft_id=info:doi/ LA - English DB - ProQuest Environmental Science Collection N1 - Date revised - 2006-09-01 N1 - SuppNotes - Product reproduced from digital image. Order this product from NTIS by: phone at 1-800-553-NTIS (U.S. customers); (703)605-6000 (other countries); fax at (703)605-6900; e-mail: orders[at]ntis.gov. NTIS Prices: PC A09/MF A02; Prepared in cooperation with Environmental Protection Agency, Chicago, IL. Region V. N1 - Last updated - 2016-12-21 ER - TY - RPRT T1 - Simulation of Ground-Water Flow and Potential Contaminant Transport at Area 6 Landfill, Naval Air Station Whidbey Island, Island County, Washington AN - 19931747; 6261734 AB - A three-dimensional finite-difference steady-state ground- water flow model was developed to simulate hydraulic conditions at the Area 6 Landfill, Naval Air Station Whidbey Island, near Oak Harbor, Washington. Remediation efforts were started in 1995 in an attempt to contain trichloroethene and other contaminants in the ground water. The model was developed as a tool to test the effectiveness of the pump-and-treat remediation efforts as well as alternative remediation strategies. The model utilized stratigraphic data from approximately 76 Navy and 19 private wells to define the geometry of the shallow, intermediate, and deep aquifers and the intervening confining layers. JF - Water Resources Investigations Report. United States Geological Survey AU - Simonds, F W Y1 - 2002///0, PY - 2002 DA - 0, 2002 PB - United States Geological Survey KW - Pollution Abstracts; Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts; Water Resources Abstracts KW - USGS-WRI-01/4252 KW - Aquifers KW - Hydraulics KW - Groundwater hydrology KW - Bioremediation KW - Path of Pollutants KW - Landfills KW - Groundwater Pollution KW - Model Testing KW - USA, Washington KW - Islands KW - Finite Element Method KW - Waste disposal sites KW - USA, Washington, Whidbey I. KW - Groundwater flow KW - Simulation KW - Numerical simulations KW - Groundwater flow models KW - Remediation KW - water flow KW - Groundwater pollution KW - Groundwater KW - Contaminants KW - Harbors KW - Groundwater Movement KW - P 2000:FRESHWATER POLLUTION KW - SW 3020:Sources and fate of pollution KW - M2 556.34:Groundwater Flow (556.34) UR - http://libproxy.lib.unc.edu/login?url=http://search.proquest.com/docview/19931747?accountid=14244 L2 - http://vb3lk7eb4t.search.serialssolutions.com/?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&rfr_id=info:sid/Pollution+Abstracts&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=report&rft.jtitle=&rft.atitle=&rft.au=Simonds%2C+F+W&rft.aulast=Simonds&rft.aufirst=F&rft.date=2002-01-01&rft.volume=&rft.issue=&rft.spage=&rft.isbn=&rft.btitle=Simulation+of+Ground-Water+Flow+and+Potential+Contaminant+Transport+at+Area+6+Landfill%2C+Naval+Air+Station+Whidbey+Island%2C+Island+County%2C+Washington&rft.title=Simulation+of+Ground-Water+Flow+and+Potential+Contaminant+Transport+at+Area+6+Landfill%2C+Naval+Air+Station+Whidbey+Island%2C+Island+County%2C+Washington&rft.issn=&rft_id=info:doi/ LA - English DB - ProQuest Environmental Science Collection N1 - Date revised - 2006-12-01 N1 - SuppNotes - Order this product from NTIS by: phone at 1-800-553-NTIS (U.S. customers); (703)605-6000 (other countries); fax at (703)605-6900; e-mail: orders[at]ntis.gov. NTIS Prices: AV A05 N1 - Last updated - 2016-12-21 ER - TY - RPRT T1 - Effects of Atmospheric Nitrogen Deposition in the Rocky Mountains of Colorado and Southern Wyoming: A Synthesis and Critical Assessment of Published Results AN - 19930091; 6261904 AB - This report provides a synthesis and critical assessment of published results on the effects of atmospheric nitrogen (N) deposition in the Rocky Mountains of Colorado and southern Wyoming. The report includes levels and trends in wet and dry atmospheric deposition of nitrogen, stream and lake nitrogen chemistry, subsurface nitrogen-cycling processes, and effects on terrestrial vegetation, aquatic biota, and amphibians. JF - Water Resources Investigations Report. United States Geological Survey AU - Burns, DA Y1 - 2002///0, PY - 2002 DA - 0, 2002 SP - 48 PB - United States Geological Survey KW - Pollution Abstracts; Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts; Water Resources Abstracts KW - USGS-WRI-02-4066 KW - Air Pollution KW - USA, Wyoming KW - Water Pollution Sources KW - Amphibians KW - Vegetation KW - Water quality KW - Streams KW - amphibians KW - North America, Rocky Mts. KW - Mountains KW - USA, Colorado KW - Biota KW - Pollutant deposition KW - Lakes KW - Nitrogen deposition KW - Atmospheric chemistry KW - Deposition KW - Nitrogen KW - M2 551.510.42:Air Pollution (551.510.42) KW - P 0000:AIR POLLUTION KW - SW 3020:Sources and fate of pollution UR - http://libproxy.lib.unc.edu/login?url=http://search.proquest.com/docview/19930091?accountid=14244 L2 - http://vb3lk7eb4t.search.serialssolutions.com/?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&rfr_id=info:sid/Pollution+Abstracts&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=report&rft.jtitle=&rft.atitle=&rft.au=Burns%2C+DA&rft.aulast=Burns&rft.aufirst=DA&rft.date=2002-01-01&rft.volume=&rft.issue=&rft.spage=48&rft.isbn=&rft.btitle=Effects+of+Atmospheric+Nitrogen+Deposition+in+the+Rocky+Mountains+of+Colorado+and+Southern+Wyoming%3A+A+Synthesis+and+Critical+Assessment+of+Published+Results&rft.title=Effects+of+Atmospheric+Nitrogen+Deposition+in+the+Rocky+Mountains+of+Colorado+and+Southern+Wyoming%3A+A+Synthesis+and+Critical+Assessment+of+Published+Results&rft.issn=&rft_id=info:doi/ LA - English DB - ProQuest Environmental Science Collection N1 - Date revised - 2006-09-01 N1 - SuppNotes - Product reproduced from digital image. Order this product from NTIS by: phone at 1-800-553-NTIS (U.S. customers); (703)605-6000 (other countries); fax at (703)605-6900; e-mail: orders[at]ntis.gov. NTIS Prices: PC A04/MF A01; Prepared in cooperation with National Park Service, Denver, CO. Rocky Mountain Regional Office. N1 - Last updated - 2016-12-21 ER - TY - RPRT T1 - Response of the St. Croix River Pools, Wisconsin and Minnesota, to Various Phosphorus-Loading Scenarios AN - 19930053; 6261867 AB - The pools in the lower reach of the St. Croix National Scenic Riverway, Wisconsin and Minnesota, and the adjoining Lake Mallalieu, are eutrophic because of high phosphorus loading. To determine how changes in phosphorus loading would affect the trophic status of these pools, the water-quality model, BATHTUB, was used to simulate existing (1999) water quality and simulate the water quality with various phosphorus-loading scenarios. Water quality in the pools may respond differently during different flow regimens; therefore, sensitivity and scenario evaluations were performed not only for 1999, but also for a simulated period with relatively low flows throughout the basin (using flow data from 1996). JF - Water Resources Investigations Report. United States Geological Survey AU - Robertson, B M AU - Lenz, B N Y1 - 2002///0, PY - 2002 DA - 0, 2002 PB - United States Geological Survey KW - Pollution Abstracts; ASFA 3: Aquatic Pollution & Environmental Quality; Water Resources Abstracts KW - USGS-WRI-02-4181 KW - Water Pollution KW - water quality KW - Eutrophic waters KW - Eutrophication KW - Phosphorus KW - Basins KW - Nutrients KW - Freshwater KW - USA, Wisconsin KW - Water quality KW - Lakes KW - Trophic structure KW - Freshwater pollution KW - Rivers KW - Sensitivity KW - Water Quality KW - Pollution Load KW - USA, Minnesota KW - Trophic levels KW - Eutrophic Lakes KW - Q5 08503:Characteristics, behavior and fate KW - P 2000:FRESHWATER POLLUTION KW - SW 3020:Sources and fate of pollution UR - http://libproxy.lib.unc.edu/login?url=http://search.proquest.com/docview/19930053?accountid=14244 L2 - http://vb3lk7eb4t.search.serialssolutions.com/?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&rfr_id=info:sid/Aquatic+Science+%26+Fisheries+Abstracts+%28ASFA%29+3%3A+Aquatic+Pollution+%26+Environmental+Quality&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=report&rft.jtitle=&rft.atitle=&rft.au=Robertson%2C+B+M%3BLenz%2C+B+N&rft.aulast=Robertson&rft.aufirst=B&rft.date=2002-01-01&rft.volume=&rft.issue=&rft.spage=&rft.isbn=&rft.btitle=Response+of+the+St.+Croix+River+Pools%2C+Wisconsin+and+Minnesota%2C+to+Various+Phosphorus-Loading+Scenarios&rft.title=Response+of+the+St.+Croix+River+Pools%2C+Wisconsin+and+Minnesota%2C+to+Various+Phosphorus-Loading+Scenarios&rft.issn=&rft_id=info:doi/ LA - English DB - ProQuest Environmental Science Collection N1 - Date revised - 2005-08-01 N1 - SuppNotes - Order this product from NTIS by: phone at 1-800-553-NTIS (U.S. customers); (703)605-6000 (other countries); fax at (703)605-6900; e-mail: orders[at]ntis.gov. NTIS Prices: AV A04; This document is color dependent and/or in landscape layout. It is currently available on CD-ROM and paper only. N1 - Last updated - 2016-12-21 ER - TY - RPRT T1 - Preliminary Assessment of Using Tree-Tissue Analysis and Passive Diffusion Samplers to Evaluate Trichloroethene Contamination of Ground Water at Site SS-34N, McChord Air Force Base, Washington, 2001 AN - 19929251; 6261873 AB - This report presents the results of a preliminary study at site SS-34N on McChord AFB to assess the feasibility of (1) using concentrations of TCE in tree tissue to assess the source and areal extent of TCE contamination in ground water at the site; and (2)using passive-diffusion samplers to collect ground-water samples for analysis of TCE concentrations. Tissue samples were collected from 20 trees at the site, and PDSs were installed in three existing monitoring wells in the study area. JF - Water Resources Investigations Report. United States Geological Survey Y1 - 2002///0, PY - 2002 DA - 0, 2002 SP - 24 PB - United States Geological Survey KW - Pollution Abstracts; Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts; Water Resources Abstracts KW - USGS-WRI-02-4274 KW - Feasibility studies KW - Plant Tissues KW - Water Pollution KW - Contamination KW - Trees KW - Groundwater Pollution KW - Samplers KW - Tissue Analysis KW - USA, Washington KW - Groundwater pollution KW - Diffusion KW - Trichloroethylene KW - Groundwater KW - M2 551.510.42:Air Pollution (551.510.42) KW - P 2000:FRESHWATER POLLUTION KW - SW 3020:Sources and fate of pollution UR - http://libproxy.lib.unc.edu/login?url=http://search.proquest.com/docview/19929251?accountid=14244 L2 - http://vb3lk7eb4t.search.serialssolutions.com/?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&rfr_id=info:sid/Pollution+Abstracts&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=report&rft.jtitle=&rft.atitle=&rft.au=&rft.aulast=&rft.aufirst=&rft.date=2002-01-01&rft.volume=&rft.issue=&rft.spage=24&rft.isbn=&rft.btitle=Preliminary+Assessment+of+Using+Tree-Tissue+Analysis+and+Passive+Diffusion+Samplers+to+Evaluate+Trichloroethene+Contamination+of+Ground+Water+at+Site+SS-34N%2C+McChord+Air+Force+Base%2C+Washington%2C+2001&rft.title=Preliminary+Assessment+of+Using+Tree-Tissue+Analysis+and+Passive+Diffusion+Samplers+to+Evaluate+Trichloroethene+Contamination+of+Ground+Water+at+Site+SS-34N%2C+McChord+Air+Force+Base%2C+Washington%2C+2001&rft.issn=&rft_id=info:doi/ LA - English DB - ProQuest Environmental Science Collection N1 - Date revised - 2006-12-01 N1 - SuppNotes - Product reproduced from digital image. Order this product from NTIS by: phone at 1-800-553-NTIS (U.S. customers); (703)605-6000 (other countries); fax at (703)605-6900; e-mail: orders[at]ntis.gov. NTIS Prices: PC A03/MF A01 N1 - Last updated - 2016-12-21 ER - TY - RPRT T1 - Water Quality of the Mississippian Carbonate Aquifer in Parts of Middle Tennessee and Northern Alabama, 1999 AN - 19929223; 6261845 AB - This report describes the occurrence and distribution of nutrients, fecal-indicator bacteria, pesticides, and VOCs from 34 ground-water sites sampled in the Eastern Highland Rim subunit of the LTEN. In addition to summarizing data for these constituents, the purpose of this report is to qualitatively characterize the susceptibility of ground water in the study area to contamination by comparing these data to data collected for similar NAWQA studies across the Nation. This report also describes the effects of natural setting (site characteristics, hydrogeology, and soil properties) and human activities (land use) on ground-water quality. JF - Water Resources Investigations Report. United States Geological Survey AU - Kingsbury, JA AU - Shelton, J M Y1 - 2002///0, PY - 2002 DA - 0, 2002 PB - United States Geological Survey KW - Pollution Abstracts; Water Resources Abstracts KW - USGS-WRI-02-4083 KW - Aquifers KW - water quality KW - Contamination KW - Water Quality KW - Groundwater Pollution KW - Land use KW - nutrients KW - USA, Alabama KW - USA, Tennessee KW - soil properties KW - Pesticides KW - Geohydrology KW - Groundwater pollution KW - Soil Properties KW - Human factors KW - Groundwater KW - Hydrologic Data KW - Volatile organic compounds KW - Data Collections KW - P 2000:FRESHWATER POLLUTION KW - SW 3020:Sources and fate of pollution UR - http://libproxy.lib.unc.edu/login?url=http://search.proquest.com/docview/19929223?accountid=14244 L2 - http://vb3lk7eb4t.search.serialssolutions.com/?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&rfr_id=info:sid/Pollution+Abstracts&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=report&rft.jtitle=&rft.atitle=&rft.au=Kingsbury%2C+JA%3BShelton%2C+J+M&rft.aulast=Kingsbury&rft.aufirst=JA&rft.date=2002-01-01&rft.volume=&rft.issue=&rft.spage=&rft.isbn=&rft.btitle=Water+Quality+of+the+Mississippian+Carbonate+Aquifer+in+Parts+of+Middle+Tennessee+and+Northern+Alabama%2C+1999&rft.title=Water+Quality+of+the+Mississippian+Carbonate+Aquifer+in+Parts+of+Middle+Tennessee+and+Northern+Alabama%2C+1999&rft.issn=&rft_id=info:doi/ LA - English DB - ProQuest Environmental Science Collection N1 - Date revised - 2006-12-01 N1 - SuppNotes - Available on CD-ROM and in paper copy only. Order this product from NTIS by: phone at 1-800-553-NTIS (U.S. customers); (703)605- 6000 (other countries); fax at (703)605-6900; e-mail: orders[at]ntis.gov. NTIS Prices: AV A04; This document is color dependent and/or in landscape layout. It is currently only available on CD-ROM. N1 - Last updated - 2016-12-21 ER - TY - RPRT T1 - Use of Temperature, Pressure, and Water Potential Data to Estimate Infiltration and Monitor Percolation in Pagany Wash Associated with the Winter of 1997-98 El Nino Precipitation, Yucca Mountain, Nevada AN - 19929102; 6261783 AB - Temperature, pressure, and water potential monitoring in two vertical boreholes at Pagany Wash near Yucca Mountain in Nevada indicated infiltration and deep percolation through and alluvium. Temperature data indicated that the annual temperature wave was measurable to a depth of 12.2 meters. Water potential values ranged from -3 to -1 bars. Temperature, pressure, and water potential disruptions were measured at a depth of 35.2 meters. The disruptions were interpreted to be the result of the percolation of infiltrated water associated with the winter of 1997-98 El Nino precipitation. JF - Water Resources Investigations Report. United States Geological Survey AU - LeCain, G D AU - Lu, N AU - Kurzmack, M Y1 - 2002///0, PY - 2002 DA - 0, 2002 PB - United States Geological Survey KW - Pollution Abstracts; ASFA 2: Ocean Technology Policy & Non-Living Resources; Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts; Water Resources Abstracts KW - USGS-WRI-02-4035 KW - Groundwater hydrology KW - USA, Nevada, Yucca Mt. KW - Rainfall KW - Water resources KW - USA, Nevada KW - Soil Water KW - Freshwater KW - water potential KW - Boreholes KW - Alluvial deposits KW - Winter KW - Mountains KW - Percolation KW - El Nino KW - Hydrology KW - Water Potentials KW - Seepages KW - Pressure KW - Hydrologic Data KW - Temperature data KW - El Nino phenomena KW - Inflow KW - Temperature KW - Precipitation KW - winter KW - boreholes KW - Infiltration KW - Groundwater pollution KW - Q2 09243:Structure, mechanics and thermodynamics KW - SW 0845:Water in soils KW - P 2000:FRESHWATER POLLUTION KW - M2 556.3:Groundwater Hydrology (556.3) UR - http://libproxy.lib.unc.edu/login?url=http://search.proquest.com/docview/19929102?accountid=14244 L2 - http://vb3lk7eb4t.search.serialssolutions.com/?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&rfr_id=info:sid/Pollution+Abstracts&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=report&rft.jtitle=&rft.atitle=&rft.au=LeCain%2C+G+D%3BLu%2C+N%3BKurzmack%2C+M&rft.aulast=LeCain&rft.aufirst=G&rft.date=2002-01-01&rft.volume=&rft.issue=&rft.spage=&rft.isbn=&rft.btitle=Use+of+Temperature%2C+Pressure%2C+and+Water+Potential+Data+to+Estimate+Infiltration+and+Monitor+Percolation+in+Pagany+Wash+Associated+with+the+Winter+of+1997-98+El+Nino+Precipitation%2C+Yucca+Mountain%2C+Nevada&rft.title=Use+of+Temperature%2C+Pressure%2C+and+Water+Potential+Data+to+Estimate+Infiltration+and+Monitor+Percolation+in+Pagany+Wash+Associated+with+the+Winter+of+1997-98+El+Nino+Precipitation%2C+Yucca+Mountain%2C+Nevada&rft.issn=&rft_id=info:doi/ LA - English DB - ProQuest Environmental Science Collection N1 - Date revised - 2006-09-01 N1 - SuppNotes - Available on CD-ROM and in paper copy only. Order this product from NTIS by: phone at 1-800-553-NTIS (U.S. customers); (703)605- 6000 (other countries); fax at (703)605-6900; e-mail: orders[at]ntis.gov. NTIS Prices: AV A04; This document is color dependent and/or in landscape layout. It is currently only available on CD-ROM. N1 - Last updated - 2016-12-21 ER - TY - RPRT T1 - Ground-Water Monitoring Plan, Water Quality, and Variability of Agricultural Chemicals in the Missouri River Alluvial Aquifer near the City of Independence, Missouri, Well Field, 1998-2000 AN - 19928586; 6261815 AB - A detailed ground-water sampling plan was developed and executed for 64 monitoring wells in the city of Independence well field to characterize ground-water quality in the 10-year zone of contribution. Samples were collected from monitoring wells, combined Independence well field pumpage, and the Missouri River at St. Joseph, Missouri, from 1998 through 2000. JF - Water Resources Investigations Report. United States Geological Survey AU - Kelly, B P Y1 - 2002///0, PY - 2002 DA - 0, 2002 PB - United States Geological Survey KW - Pollution Abstracts; ASFA 3: Aquatic Pollution & Environmental Quality; Water Resources Abstracts KW - USGS-WRI-02-4096 KW - Aquifers KW - water quality KW - Pollution monitoring KW - USA, Missouri R. KW - Water sampling KW - Agricultural pollution KW - Water Sampling KW - Water Quality KW - Groundwater Pollution KW - Freshwater KW - Water quality KW - Agrochemicals KW - Agricultural Chemicals KW - Wells KW - USA, Missouri KW - Water wells KW - Groundwater pollution KW - Pumpage KW - Monitoring KW - Alluvial Aquifers KW - Groundwater KW - Agricultural runoff KW - Urban areas KW - Q5 08503:Characteristics, behavior and fate KW - P 2000:FRESHWATER POLLUTION KW - SW 3020:Sources and fate of pollution UR - http://libproxy.lib.unc.edu/login?url=http://search.proquest.com/docview/19928586?accountid=14244 L2 - http://vb3lk7eb4t.search.serialssolutions.com/?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&rfr_id=info:sid/Aquatic+Science+%26+Fisheries+Abstracts+%28ASFA%29+3%3A+Aquatic+Pollution+%26+Environmental+Quality&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=report&rft.jtitle=&rft.atitle=&rft.au=Kelly%2C+B+P&rft.aulast=Kelly&rft.aufirst=B&rft.date=2002-01-01&rft.volume=&rft.issue=&rft.spage=&rft.isbn=&rft.btitle=Ground-Water+Monitoring+Plan%2C+Water+Quality%2C+and+Variability+of+Agricultural+Chemicals+in+the+Missouri+River+Alluvial+Aquifer+near+the+City+of+Independence%2C+Missouri%2C+Well+Field%2C+1998-2000&rft.title=Ground-Water+Monitoring+Plan%2C+Water+Quality%2C+and+Variability+of+Agricultural+Chemicals+in+the+Missouri+River+Alluvial+Aquifer+near+the+City+of+Independence%2C+Missouri%2C+Well+Field%2C+1998-2000&rft.issn=&rft_id=info:doi/ LA - English DB - ProQuest Environmental Science Collection N1 - Date revised - 2005-08-01 N1 - SuppNotes - Order this product from NTIS by: phone at 1-800-553-NTIS (U.S. customers); (703)605-6000 (other countries); fax at (703)605-6900; e-mail: orders[at]ntis.gov. NTIS Prices: AV A06; This document is color dependent and/or in landscape layout. It is currently only available on CD-ROM. N1 - Last updated - 2016-12-21 ER - TY - RPRT T1 - Spatial Patterns and Temporal Variability in Water Quality from City of Albuquerque Drinking-Water Supply Wells and Piezometer Nests, with Implications for the Ground-Water Flow System AN - 19928573; 6261794 AB - This report examines water-quality data for City drinking- water supply wells and deep piezometer nests to improve understanding of the regional geohydrologic framework. Water-level data for the deep piezometer nests were also examined to better define the ground-water flow system and its response to ground- water pumpage. Examination of water-quality data is limited to a subset of 10 water-quality parameters (dissolved solids, calcium, sodium, bicarbonate, sulfate, chloride, silica, arsenic, field pH, and water temperature) selected to represent major-element and trace-element chemistry and physical properties of water from the aquifer. These 10 water-quality parameters are examined for spatial patterns, both areally and with depth, and implications for ground-water source areas and flow paths. JF - Water Resources Investigations Report. United States Geological Survey AU - Bexfield, L M AU - Anderholm, S K Y1 - 2002///0, PY - 2002 DA - 0, 2002 SP - 112 PB - United States Geological Survey KW - Sustainability Science Abstracts; ASFA 2: Ocean Technology Policy & Non-Living Resources; Pollution Abstracts; Water Resources Abstracts; Human Population KW - USGS-WRI-01-4244 KW - Sulfates KW - water quality KW - Aquifer KW - Chlorophylls KW - Calcium KW - Water Supply KW - Water resources KW - Water quality KW - Water supplies KW - Piezometers KW - pH effects KW - pH KW - Water Level KW - Water temperature KW - USA, New Mexico, Albuquerque KW - Groundwater KW - Aquifers KW - Chlorides KW - Groundwater Pollution KW - nests KW - Well Water KW - spatial distribution KW - Drinking Water KW - bicarbonates KW - silica KW - Dissolved solids KW - Groundwater Management KW - Urban areas KW - Urban environments KW - Arsenic KW - Bicarbonates KW - Temporal variations KW - Water supply KW - Sodium KW - Physical properties KW - Silica KW - Water wells KW - Drinking water KW - Groundwater Movement KW - water temperature KW - Q2 09263:Topography and morphology KW - M3 1010:Issues in Sustainable Development KW - P 2000:FRESHWATER POLLUTION KW - M1 125:Population Health-Environment Relations KW - SW 3020:Sources and fate of pollution UR - http://libproxy.lib.unc.edu/login?url=http://search.proquest.com/docview/19928573?accountid=14244 L2 - http://vb3lk7eb4t.search.serialssolutions.com/?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&rfr_id=info:sid/Sustainability+Science+Abstracts&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=report&rft.jtitle=&rft.atitle=&rft.au=Bexfield%2C+L+M%3BAnderholm%2C+S+K&rft.aulast=Bexfield&rft.aufirst=L&rft.date=2002-01-01&rft.volume=&rft.issue=&rft.spage=112&rft.isbn=&rft.btitle=Spatial+Patterns+and+Temporal+Variability+in+Water+Quality+from+City+of+Albuquerque+Drinking-Water+Supply+Wells+and+Piezometer+Nests%2C+with+Implications+for+the+Ground-Water+Flow+System&rft.title=Spatial+Patterns+and+Temporal+Variability+in+Water+Quality+from+City+of+Albuquerque+Drinking-Water+Supply+Wells+and+Piezometer+Nests%2C+with+Implications+for+the+Ground-Water+Flow+System&rft.issn=&rft_id=info:doi/ LA - English DB - ProQuest Environmental Science Collection N1 - Date revised - 2006-12-01 N1 - SuppNotes - Product reproduced from digital image. Order this product from NTIS by: phone at 1-800-553-NTIS (U.S. customers); (703)605-6000 (other countries); fax at (703)605-6900; e-mail: orders[at]ntis.gov. NTIS Prices: PC A07/MF A02 N1 - Last updated - 2016-12-22 ER - TY - RPRT T1 - Water-Quality and Physical Characteristics of Streams in the Treyburn Development Area of Falls Lake Watershed, North Carolina, 1994-98 AN - 19928540; 6261748 AB - The purpose of this report is to characterize water-quality trends in selected streams flowing in or near the Treyburn development and identify nutrient and sediment loads at each site. The extent to which development affects water quality in Treyburn drainages also is described. An assessment of the condition of the benthic macroinvertebrate community at selected sites is presented. In addition, the channel geometry of selected streams in the Treyburn development is described to provide baseline data on physical stream characteristics and to relate those data to the condition of the benthic macroinvertebrate community. JF - Water Resources Investigations Report. United States Geological Survey AU - Oblinger, C J AU - Cuffney, T F AU - Meador, M R AU - Garrett, R G Y1 - 2002///0, PY - 2002 DA - 0, 2002 PB - United States Geological Survey KW - Pollution Abstracts; ASFA 3: Aquatic Pollution & Environmental Quality; ASFA 2: Ocean Technology Policy & Non-Living Resources; Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts; Water Resources Abstracts KW - USGS-WRI-02-4046 KW - USA, North Carolina KW - water quality KW - Water Pollution Sources KW - Macroinvertebrates KW - Freshwater KW - Watersheds KW - Water quality KW - Streams KW - Lakes KW - Baseline studies KW - River water quality KW - Assessments KW - Catchment basins KW - Hydrography KW - Stream Pollution KW - Sediment transport KW - Sediment pollution KW - Drainage KW - Water Quality KW - River discharge KW - Sediments KW - drainage water KW - Sediment load KW - Nutrients (mineral) KW - Zoobenthos KW - Benthos KW - M2 556.53:Rivers, Streams, Canals (556.53) KW - P 2000:FRESHWATER POLLUTION KW - SW 3020:Sources and fate of pollution KW - Q2 09171:Dynamics of lakes and rivers KW - Q5 08502:Methods and instruments UR - http://libproxy.lib.unc.edu/login?url=http://search.proquest.com/docview/19928540?accountid=14244 L2 - http://vb3lk7eb4t.search.serialssolutions.com/?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&rfr_id=info:sid/Aquatic+Science+%26+Fisheries+Abstracts+%28ASFA%29+3%3A+Aquatic+Pollution+%26+Environmental+Quality&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=report&rft.jtitle=&rft.atitle=&rft.au=Oblinger%2C+C+J%3BCuffney%2C+T+F%3BMeador%2C+M+R%3BGarrett%2C+R+G&rft.aulast=Oblinger&rft.aufirst=C&rft.date=2002-01-01&rft.volume=&rft.issue=&rft.spage=&rft.isbn=&rft.btitle=Water-Quality+and+Physical+Characteristics+of+Streams+in+the+Treyburn+Development+Area+of+Falls+Lake+Watershed%2C+North+Carolina%2C+1994-98&rft.title=Water-Quality+and+Physical+Characteristics+of+Streams+in+the+Treyburn+Development+Area+of+Falls+Lake+Watershed%2C+North+Carolina%2C+1994-98&rft.issn=&rft_id=info:doi/ LA - English DB - ProQuest Environmental Science Collection N1 - Date revised - 2006-09-01 N1 - SuppNotes - Order this product from NTIS by: phone at 1-800-553-NTIS (U.S. customers); (703)605-6000 (other countries); fax at (703)605-6900; e-mail: orders[at]ntis.gov. NTIS Prices: AV A06; This document is color dependent and/or in landscape layout. It is currently only available on CD-ROM. Prepared in cooperation with North Carolina Dept. of Natural Resources and Environmental Management, Raleigh. N1 - Last updated - 2016-12-21 ER - TY - RPRT T1 - Effects of Hardened Low Water Crossings on Steam Habitat, Water Quality, and Periphyton in Four Streams at the Fort Polk Military Reservation, Vernon Parish, Louisiana, October 1998 through November 1999 AN - 19927933; 6261905 AB - This report documents the effects of hardened low-water crossings on stream habitat, water quality, and periphyton in four streams at the Reservation. Descriptive information and data on the watersheds and streams are included. Field, laboratory, and statistical methods used in the collection of water-quality and periphyton data by the USGS are described, and all data collected are presented. Knowledge of upstream and downstream water-quality conditions before and after modification of the low-water crossings will aid the U.S. Army in assessing potential effects of crossing modifications on small streams draining the Reservation. JF - Water Resources Investigations Report. United States Geological Survey AU - Tollett, R W AU - Bryan, B W AU - Bryan, C F Y1 - 2002///0, PY - 2002 DA - 0, 2002 PB - United States Geological Survey KW - Pollution Abstracts; Microbiology Abstracts C: Algology, Mycology & Protozoology; ASFA 3: Aquatic Pollution & Environmental Quality; Water Resources Abstracts KW - USGS-WRI-02-4291 KW - water quality KW - Statistics KW - Water Pollution Sources KW - Steam KW - Man-induced effects KW - Water resources KW - Statistical Methods KW - Freshwater KW - Water quality KW - Watersheds KW - Streams KW - upstream KW - USA, Louisiana KW - Stream Pollution KW - Military KW - Data processing KW - Construction KW - Water Quality KW - Habitat KW - Ecosystem disturbance KW - Aquatic Habitats KW - downstream KW - Periphyton KW - P 2000:FRESHWATER POLLUTION KW - SW 3020:Sources and fate of pollution KW - Q5 08504:Effects on organisms KW - K 03450:Ecology KW - Q5 08521:Mechanical and natural changes UR - http://libproxy.lib.unc.edu/login?url=http://search.proquest.com/docview/19927933?accountid=14244 L2 - http://vb3lk7eb4t.search.serialssolutions.com/?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&rfr_id=info:sid/Aquatic+Science+%26+Fisheries+Abstracts+%28ASFA%29+3%3A+Aquatic+Pollution+%26+Environmental+Quality&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=report&rft.jtitle=&rft.atitle=&rft.au=Tollett%2C+R+W%3BBryan%2C+B+W%3BBryan%2C+C+F&rft.aulast=Tollett&rft.aufirst=R&rft.date=2002-01-01&rft.volume=&rft.issue=&rft.spage=&rft.isbn=&rft.btitle=Effects+of+Hardened+Low+Water+Crossings+on+Steam+Habitat%2C+Water+Quality%2C+and+Periphyton+in+Four+Streams+at+the+Fort+Polk+Military+Reservation%2C+Vernon+Parish%2C+Louisiana%2C+October+1998+through+November+1999&rft.title=Effects+of+Hardened+Low+Water+Crossings+on+Steam+Habitat%2C+Water+Quality%2C+and+Periphyton+in+Four+Streams+at+the+Fort+Polk+Military+Reservation%2C+Vernon+Parish%2C+Louisiana%2C+October+1998+through+November+1999&rft.issn=&rft_id=info:doi/ LA - English DB - ProQuest Environmental Science Collection N1 - Date revised - 2006-07-01 N1 - SuppNotes - Order this product from NTIS by: phone at 1-800-553-NTIS (U.S. customers); (703)605-6000 (other countries); fax at (703)605-6900; e-mail: orders[at]ntis.gov. NTIS Prices: AV A06; This document is color dependent and/or in landscape layout. It is currently available on CD-ROM and paper only. CD-ROM contains a 76 page document. N1 - Last updated - 2016-12-21 ER - TY - RPRT T1 - Simulated Ground-Water Flow, Naval Air Warfare Center, West Trenton, New Jersey AN - 19927866; 6261841 AB - The effectiveness of ground-water pumping by the use of recovery wells in preventing contaminated ground water at the Naval Air Warfare Center (NAWC), West Trenton, N.J., from moving off the NAWC property was evaluated by use of a digital model of ground-water flow. The finite-difference, three-dimensional, porous-medium model uses the MODFLOW code to solve the ground- water-flow equation. Ground-water flowpaths from areas at and near contaminated well sites for a no-pumping and two recovery-well- pumping scenarios were computed using the post-processor MODPATH. JF - Water Resources Investigations Report. United States Geological Survey AU - Lewis-Brown, J C AU - Rice, DE Y1 - 2002///0, PY - 2002 DA - 0, 2002 PB - United States Geological Survey KW - Pollution Abstracts; Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts; Water Resources Abstracts KW - USGS-WRI-02-4019 KW - USA, New Jersey KW - Groundwater Mining KW - Groundwater flow KW - Groundwater Pollution KW - Soil contamination KW - Pumping tests KW - Wells KW - Groundwater models KW - Remediation KW - Water wells KW - Groundwater pollution KW - Pumping KW - Groundwater KW - Groundwater Movement KW - Water Resources KW - P 2000:FRESHWATER POLLUTION KW - SW 3020:Sources and fate of pollution KW - M2 556.34:Groundwater Flow (556.34) UR - http://libproxy.lib.unc.edu/login?url=http://search.proquest.com/docview/19927866?accountid=14244 L2 - http://vb3lk7eb4t.search.serialssolutions.com/?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&rfr_id=info:sid/Pollution+Abstracts&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=report&rft.jtitle=&rft.atitle=&rft.au=Lewis-Brown%2C+J+C%3BRice%2C+DE&rft.aulast=Lewis-Brown&rft.aufirst=J&rft.date=2002-01-01&rft.volume=&rft.issue=&rft.spage=&rft.isbn=&rft.btitle=Simulated+Ground-Water+Flow%2C+Naval+Air+Warfare+Center%2C+West+Trenton%2C+New+Jersey&rft.title=Simulated+Ground-Water+Flow%2C+Naval+Air+Warfare+Center%2C+West+Trenton%2C+New+Jersey&rft.issn=&rft_id=info:doi/ LA - English DB - ProQuest Environmental Science Collection N1 - Date revised - 2006-12-01 N1 - SuppNotes - Available on CD-ROM and in paper copy only. Order this product from NTIS by: phone at 1-800-553-NTIS (U.S. customers); (703)605- 6000 (other countries); fax at (703)605-6900; e-mail: orders[at]ntis.gov. NTIS Prices: AV A05; This document is color dependent and/or in landscape layout. It is currently only available on CD-ROM. Prepared in cooperation with Department of the Navy, Washington, DC. N1 - Last updated - 2016-12-21 ER - TY - RPRT T1 - Hyrogeology and Leachate Plume Delineation at a Closed Municipal Landfill, Norman, Oklahoma AN - 19927820; 6261817 AB - The City of Norman operated a solid-waste municipal landfill at two sites in the Canadian River alluvium in Cleveland County, Oklahoma from 1970 to 1985. The sites, referred to as the west and east cells of the landfill, were originally excavations in the unconsolidated alluvial deposits and were not lined. Analysis of ground-water samples indicate that leachate from the west cell is discharging into an adjacent abandoned river channel, referred to as the slough, and is migrating downgradient in ground water toward the Canadian River. The report describes the hydrogeologic features at the landfill, including the topography of the bedrock, water-level changes in the alluvial aquifer, and delineates the leachate plume using specific conductance data. JF - Water Resources Investigations Report. United States Geological Survey AU - Becker, C J Y1 - 2002///0, PY - 2002 DA - 0, 2002 SP - 44 PB - United States Geological Survey KW - Pollution Abstracts; Water Resources Abstracts KW - USGS-WRI-01-4168 KW - USA, Ohio, Cleveland KW - Aquifers KW - Alluvial Deposits KW - USA, New Mexico, Canadian R. KW - Landfills KW - USA, Oklahoma, Norman KW - Groundwater Pollution KW - Water Level KW - USA, Oklahoma KW - Channels KW - Waste disposal sites KW - Geohydrology KW - Groundwater KW - Leachates KW - Plumes KW - Topography KW - Urban areas KW - P 2000:FRESHWATER POLLUTION KW - SW 3020:Sources and fate of pollution UR - http://libproxy.lib.unc.edu/login?url=http://search.proquest.com/docview/19927820?accountid=14244 L2 - http://vb3lk7eb4t.search.serialssolutions.com/?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&rfr_id=info:sid/Pollution+Abstracts&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=report&rft.jtitle=&rft.atitle=&rft.au=Becker%2C+C+J&rft.aulast=Becker&rft.aufirst=C&rft.date=2002-01-01&rft.volume=&rft.issue=&rft.spage=44&rft.isbn=&rft.btitle=Hyrogeology+and+Leachate+Plume+Delineation+at+a+Closed+Municipal+Landfill%2C+Norman%2C+Oklahoma&rft.title=Hyrogeology+and+Leachate+Plume+Delineation+at+a+Closed+Municipal+Landfill%2C+Norman%2C+Oklahoma&rft.issn=&rft_id=info:doi/ LA - English DB - ProQuest Environmental Science Collection N1 - Date revised - 2006-12-01 N1 - SuppNotes - Product reproduced from digital image. Order this product from NTIS by: phone at 1-800-553-NTIS (U.S. customers); (703)605-6000 (other countries); fax at (703)605-6900; e-mail: orders[at]ntis.gov. NTIS Prices: PC A04/MF A01 N1 - Last updated - 2016-12-21 ER - TY - RPRT T1 - Nitrogen and Phosphorus in Streams of the Great Miami River Basin, Ohio, 1998-2000 AN - 19927235; 6261886 AB - This report describes and quantifies major sources of nutrients (nitrogen and phosphorus) in the Great Miami River Basin, describes spatial and temporal variations in nutrient concentrations at selected monitoring sites, lists estimated loads and yields of nutrients from five stream site monitored, and relates observed loads and yields to selected environmental factors and land use. Instream concentrations of nutrients are based on analyses of water samples collected from three tributaries of the Great Miami River and from two main-stem sites. JF - Water Resources Investigations Report. United States Geological Survey AU - Reutter, D C Y1 - 2002///0, PY - 2002 DA - 0, 2002 PB - United States Geological Survey KW - Pollution Abstracts; ASFA 2: Ocean Technology Policy & Non-Living Resources; Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts; Water Resources Abstracts KW - USGS-WRI-02-4297 KW - River Basins KW - Water sampling KW - Water Pollution Sources KW - nutrient concentrations KW - Phosphorus KW - Water resources KW - Nutrients KW - Freshwater KW - Water quality KW - Streams KW - Chemistry of river water KW - Stream Pollution KW - Tributaries KW - Rivers KW - environmental factors KW - Temporal variations KW - USA, Ohio, Great Miami R. KW - Pollution Load KW - River basins KW - Land use KW - nutrients KW - Phosphorus in river water KW - Nutrients (mineral) KW - USA, Ohio KW - Monitoring KW - Nitrogen in river water KW - Nitrogen KW - M2 556:General (556) KW - P 2000:FRESHWATER POLLUTION KW - Q2 09184:Composition of water KW - SW 3020:Sources and fate of pollution UR - http://libproxy.lib.unc.edu/login?url=http://search.proquest.com/docview/19927235?accountid=14244 L2 - http://vb3lk7eb4t.search.serialssolutions.com/?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&rfr_id=info:sid/Pollution+Abstracts&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=report&rft.jtitle=&rft.atitle=&rft.au=Reutter%2C+D+C&rft.aulast=Reutter&rft.aufirst=D&rft.date=2002-01-01&rft.volume=&rft.issue=&rft.spage=&rft.isbn=&rft.btitle=Nitrogen+and+Phosphorus+in+Streams+of+the+Great+Miami+River+Basin%2C+Ohio%2C+1998-2000&rft.title=Nitrogen+and+Phosphorus+in+Streams+of+the+Great+Miami+River+Basin%2C+Ohio%2C+1998-2000&rft.issn=&rft_id=info:doi/ LA - English DB - ProQuest Environmental Science Collection N1 - Date revised - 2006-07-01 N1 - SuppNotes - Order this product from NTIS by: phone at 1-800-553-NTIS (U.S. customers); (703)605-6000 (other countries); fax at (703)605-6900; e-mail: orders[at]ntis.gov. NTIS Prices: AV A06; This document is color dependent and/or in landscape layout. It is currently available on CD-ROM and paper only. N1 - Last updated - 2016-12-21 ER - TY - RPRT T1 - Assessment of Environmental Factors Affecting Fecal-Coliform Concentrations in Hampton/Seabrook Harbor, New Hampshire, 2000-01 AN - 19927202; 6261898 AB - Environmental factors that affect concentrations of fecal- coliform bacteria were investigated by the U.S. Geological Survey, in cooperation with the New Hampshire Department of Environmental Services, at Hamptom/Seabrook Harbor in the towns of Hampton, Hampton Falls, and Seabrook, N.H. Hampton/Seabrook Harbor and nearby tributaries constitute one of the most productive shellfish habitats in New Hampshire. Water samples and data on other environmental factors were collected from the Harbor and tributaries on a routine and precipitation-event basis from March 2000 through December 2001. Water samples were analyzed for fecal- coliform concentrations. Data for other environmental factors collected included rainfall, salinity, turbidity, water temperature, wind speed, wind direction, air temperature, qualitative counts on bird populations, and basin characteristics such as area served by municipal sewer, on-site septic systems, and population density. These environmental factors were tested to determine if any relations were present with fecal-coliform concentrations in water. JF - Water Resources Investigations Report. United States Geological Survey AU - Deacon, J R AU - Nash, W C Y1 - 2002///0, PY - 2002 DA - 0, 2002 PB - United States Geological Survey KW - Pollution Abstracts; ASFA 3: Aquatic Pollution & Environmental Quality; Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts; Water Resources Abstracts KW - USGS-WRI-02-4252 KW - Water sampling KW - air temperature KW - Water Analysis KW - Rainfall KW - Water Sampling KW - geological surveys KW - Population density KW - Basins KW - Water resources KW - Microbial contamination KW - Septic tanks KW - Environmental factors KW - Air temperature KW - Water temperatures KW - Wind speed KW - Salinity KW - Sewers KW - USA, New Hampshire KW - Tributaries KW - ANW, USA, New Hampshire, Seabrook KW - Marine KW - Bacteria KW - environmental factors KW - Coliforms KW - Water Quality KW - USA, New Hampshire, Seabrook KW - Habitat KW - Wind direction KW - Harbours KW - Water pollution KW - Aves KW - towns KW - Marine molluscs KW - Shellfish KW - Birds KW - Harbors KW - water temperature KW - Turbidity KW - Q5 08503:Characteristics, behavior and fate KW - P 2000:FRESHWATER POLLUTION KW - SW 3020:Sources and fate of pollution KW - M2 551.510:General Atmospheric Structure (551.510) UR - http://libproxy.lib.unc.edu/login?url=http://search.proquest.com/docview/19927202?accountid=14244 L2 - http://vb3lk7eb4t.search.serialssolutions.com/?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&rfr_id=info:sid/Aquatic+Science+%26+Fisheries+Abstracts+%28ASFA%29+3%3A+Aquatic+Pollution+%26+Environmental+Quality&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=report&rft.jtitle=&rft.atitle=&rft.au=Deacon%2C+J+R%3BNash%2C+W+C&rft.aulast=Deacon&rft.aufirst=J&rft.date=2002-01-01&rft.volume=&rft.issue=&rft.spage=&rft.isbn=&rft.btitle=Assessment+of+Environmental+Factors+Affecting+Fecal-Coliform+Concentrations+in+Hampton%2FSeabrook+Harbor%2C+New+Hampshire%2C+2000-01&rft.title=Assessment+of+Environmental+Factors+Affecting+Fecal-Coliform+Concentrations+in+Hampton%2FSeabrook+Harbor%2C+New+Hampshire%2C+2000-01&rft.issn=&rft_id=info:doi/ LA - English DB - ProQuest Environmental Science Collection N1 - Date revised - 2006-12-01 N1 - SuppNotes - Order this product from NTIS by: phone at 1-800-553-NTIS (U.S. customers); (703)605-6000 (other countries); fax at (703)605-6900; e-mail: orders[at]ntis.gov. NTIS Prices: AV A03; This document is color dependent and/or in landscape layout. It is currently available on CD-ROM and paper only. N1 - Last updated - 2016-12-21 ER - TY - RPRT T1 - Water-Quality, Biological, and Habitat Assessment of the Boeuf River Basin, Southeastern Arkansas, 1994-96 AN - 19927154; 6261885 AB - The purpose of this report is to describe the results of a water-quality and biological investigation of selected drainages in the Boeuf River Basin of southeastern Arkansas. Water quality is assessed using water-quality data collected during three types of sampling efforts-a synoptic sampling of 25 sites during relatively low flow conditions during November through December 1994, stormwater runoff sampling of a forested area and a cotton field during January 1995 through December 1996, and sampling of a catfish pond discharge in April and May of 1995. Biological benthic macroinvertebrate and habitat information for the 25 synoptic sites also used in the assessment. JF - Water Resources Investigations Report. United States Geological Survey AU - Barks, S AU - Petersen, J C AU - Usrey, F D Y1 - 2002///0, PY - 2002 DA - 0, 2002 SP - 46 PB - United States Geological Survey KW - Pollution Abstracts; ASFA 3: Aquatic Pollution & Environmental Quality; Water Resources Abstracts KW - USGS-WRI-02-4187 KW - Water Pollution KW - water quality KW - River Basins KW - Cotton KW - Storm Runoff KW - Water Sampling KW - Macroinvertebrates KW - Freshwater KW - Freshwater fish KW - Water quality KW - Ponds KW - Stormwater runoff KW - Biological surveys KW - Water Quality KW - River discharge KW - River basins KW - Habitat KW - Pollution surveys KW - Aquatic Habitats KW - Catfish Ponds KW - USA, Arkansas KW - Zoobenthos KW - P 2000:FRESHWATER POLLUTION KW - SW 3020:Sources and fate of pollution KW - Q5 08502:Methods and instruments UR - http://libproxy.lib.unc.edu/login?url=http://search.proquest.com/docview/19927154?accountid=14244 L2 - http://vb3lk7eb4t.search.serialssolutions.com/?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&rfr_id=info:sid/Aquatic+Science+%26+Fisheries+Abstracts+%28ASFA%29+3%3A+Aquatic+Pollution+%26+Environmental+Quality&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=report&rft.jtitle=&rft.atitle=&rft.au=Barks%2C+S%3BPetersen%2C+J+C%3BUsrey%2C+F+D&rft.aulast=Barks&rft.aufirst=S&rft.date=2002-01-01&rft.volume=&rft.issue=&rft.spage=46&rft.isbn=&rft.btitle=Water-Quality%2C+Biological%2C+and+Habitat+Assessment+of+the+Boeuf+River+Basin%2C+Southeastern+Arkansas%2C+1994-96&rft.title=Water-Quality%2C+Biological%2C+and+Habitat+Assessment+of+the+Boeuf+River+Basin%2C+Southeastern+Arkansas%2C+1994-96&rft.issn=&rft_id=info:doi/ LA - English DB - ProQuest Environmental Science Collection N1 - Date revised - 2005-08-01 N1 - SuppNotes - Product reproduced from digital image. Order this product from NTIS by: phone at 1-800-553-NTIS (U.S. customers); (703)605-6000 (other countries); fax at (703)605-6900; e-mail: orders[at]ntis.gov. NTIS Prices: PC A04/MF A01 N1 - Last updated - 2016-12-21 ER - TY - RPRT T1 - Assessments of Aquifer Sensitivity on Navajo Nation and Adjacent Lands and Ground-Water Vulnerability to Pesticide Contamination on the Navajo Indian Irrigation Project, Arizona, New Mexcio and Utah AN - 19927104; 6261839 AB - The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency requested that the Navajo Nation conduct an assessment of aquifer sensitivity on Navajo Nation lands and an assessment of ground-water vulnerability to pesticide contamination on the Navajo Indian Irrigation Project. Navajo Nation lands include about 17,000 square miles in northeastern Arizona, northwestern New Mexico, and Southeastern Utah. The Navajo Indian Irrigation Project began operation in 1976; presently (2001) about 62,000 acres are available for irrigated agriculture. Numerous pesticides have been used on the Navajo Indian Irrigation Project during its operation. JF - Water Resources Investigations Report. United States Geological Survey AU - Blanchard, P J Y1 - 2002///0, PY - 2002 DA - 0, 2002 PB - United States Geological Survey KW - Pollution Abstracts; Water Resources Abstracts KW - USGS-WRI-02-4051 KW - USA, Utah KW - Aquifers KW - Sensitivity KW - USA, New Mexico KW - Contamination KW - Water Pollution Sources KW - Irrigation KW - agriculture KW - Groundwater Pollution KW - EPA KW - Assessments KW - Irrigation Operation KW - Pesticides KW - USA, Arizona KW - Groundwater pollution KW - vulnerability KW - Vulnerability KW - Groundwater KW - P 2000:FRESHWATER POLLUTION KW - SW 3020:Sources and fate of pollution UR - http://libproxy.lib.unc.edu/login?url=http://search.proquest.com/docview/19927104?accountid=14244 L2 - http://vb3lk7eb4t.search.serialssolutions.com/?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&rfr_id=info:sid/Pollution+Abstracts&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=report&rft.jtitle=&rft.atitle=&rft.au=Blanchard%2C+P+J&rft.aulast=Blanchard&rft.aufirst=P&rft.date=2002-01-01&rft.volume=&rft.issue=&rft.spage=&rft.isbn=&rft.btitle=Assessments+of+Aquifer+Sensitivity+on+Navajo+Nation+and+Adjacent+Lands+and+Ground-Water+Vulnerability+to+Pesticide+Contamination+on+the+Navajo+Indian+Irrigation+Project%2C+Arizona%2C+New+Mexcio+and+Utah&rft.title=Assessments+of+Aquifer+Sensitivity+on+Navajo+Nation+and+Adjacent+Lands+and+Ground-Water+Vulnerability+to+Pesticide+Contamination+on+the+Navajo+Indian+Irrigation+Project%2C+Arizona%2C+New+Mexcio+and+Utah&rft.issn=&rft_id=info:doi/ LA - English DB - ProQuest Environmental Science Collection N1 - Date revised - 2006-12-01 N1 - SuppNotes - Order this product from NTIS by: phone at 1-800-553-NTIS (U.S. customers); (703)605-6000 (other countries); fax at (703)605-6900; e-mail: orders[at]ntis.gov. NTIS Prices: AV A04; This document is color dependent and/or in landscape layout. It is currently only available on CD-ROM. Sponsored by Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. N1 - Last updated - 2016-12-21 ER - TY - RPRT T1 - Nutrient Dynamics in Five Off-Stream Reservoirs in the Lower South Platte River Basin, March-September 1995. National Water Quality Assessment Program AN - 19926929; 6261804 AB - In 1991, the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) began a study of the South Platte River Basin as part of the National Water-Quality Assessment (NAWQA) The purposes of this report are to (1) describe the spatial and temporal variation in nutrient concentrations in five off-stream reservoirs in the lower South Platte River Basin, (2) determine whether the reservoirs are a source or a sink of nutrients in irrigation-supply water, and (3) determine how the nutrient dynamics in the reservoirs differ from one another. Data collected for this study include depth profiles of water temperature, dissolved oxygen, pH, and specific conductance; nutrient species concentrations in the water column, bottom sediments, and inflow and outflow canals; and chlorophyll-a concentrations. These data were collected during the irrigation season from March through September 1995 at five sites each in Riverside, Jackson, Prewitt, and Julesburg Reservoirs and at six sites in North Sterling Reservoir. JF - Water Resources Investigations Report. United States Geological Survey AU - Sprague, LA Y1 - 2002///0, PY - 2002 DA - 0, 2002 PB - United States Geological Survey KW - Pollution Abstracts; ASFA 3: Aquatic Pollution & Environmental Quality; Water Resources Abstracts KW - USGS-WRI-02-4142 KW - water quality KW - River Basins KW - USA, Colorado, South Platte River Basin KW - Water reservoirs KW - Water Pollution Sources KW - geological surveys KW - Reservoir Sites KW - nutrient concentrations KW - outflow KW - Nutrients KW - Freshwater KW - Water quality KW - Dissolved oxygen KW - Assessments KW - USA, Colorado, Lower South Platte R. KW - inflow KW - Reservoirs KW - pH KW - Pollution data KW - nutrient dynamics KW - Sediment chemistry KW - Temporal variations KW - Irrigation KW - Dissolved Oxygen KW - Water Quality KW - River basins KW - Pollution surveys KW - Sediments KW - Canals KW - water column KW - Nutrients (mineral) KW - water temperature KW - Q5 08503:Characteristics, behavior and fate KW - P 2000:FRESHWATER POLLUTION KW - SW 3020:Sources and fate of pollution UR - http://libproxy.lib.unc.edu/login?url=http://search.proquest.com/docview/19926929?accountid=14244 L2 - http://vb3lk7eb4t.search.serialssolutions.com/?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&rfr_id=info:sid/Aquatic+Science+%26+Fisheries+Abstracts+%28ASFA%29+3%3A+Aquatic+Pollution+%26+Environmental+Quality&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=report&rft.jtitle=&rft.atitle=&rft.au=Sprague%2C+LA&rft.aulast=Sprague&rft.aufirst=LA&rft.date=2002-01-01&rft.volume=&rft.issue=&rft.spage=&rft.isbn=&rft.btitle=Nutrient+Dynamics+in+Five+Off-Stream+Reservoirs+in+the+Lower+South+Platte+River+Basin%2C+March-September+1995.+National+Water+Quality+Assessment+Program&rft.title=Nutrient+Dynamics+in+Five+Off-Stream+Reservoirs+in+the+Lower+South+Platte+River+Basin%2C+March-September+1995.+National+Water+Quality+Assessment+Program&rft.issn=&rft_id=info:doi/ LA - English DB - ProQuest Environmental Science Collection N1 - Date revised - 2005-08-01 N1 - SuppNotes - Order this product from NTIS by: phone at 1-800-553-NTIS (U.S. customers); (703)605-6000 (other countries); fax at (703)605-6900; e-mail: orders[at]ntis.gov. NTIS Prices: AV A06; This document is color dependent and/or in landscape layout. It is currently only available on CD-ROM. N1 - Last updated - 2016-12-21 ER - TY - RPRT T1 - Evaluation of Borehole Geophysical Logging, Aquifer-Isolation Tests, Distribution of Contaminants, and Water-Level Measurements at the North Penn Area 5 Superfund Site, Bucks and Montgomery Counties, Pennsylvania AN - 19926879; 6261741 AB - This report describes the results of borehole geophysical logging and aquifer-isolation (packer) test at the North Penn Area 5 Superfund Site. Caliper, natural-gamma, single-point-resistance, fluid-resistivity, fluid-temperature, and heatpulse-flow-meter logs were run in 32 boreholes. Digital acoustic-televiewer logs were run in 32 boreholes. Borehole television surveys were run in 32 boleholes. The report identifies water-bearing zones and intervals of vertical borehole flow. Aquifer-isolation tests were performed in four boreholes. Samples for water-quality analyses for volatile organic compounds (VOC's) were collected from discrete zones in four boleholes to determine the distribution of contamination. This report also presents a potentiometric-surface map of the site on July 13, 1998. JF - Water Resources Investigations Report. United States Geological Survey AU - Bird, PH AU - Conger, R W Y1 - 2002///0, PY - 2002 DA - 0, 2002 PB - United States Geological Survey KW - Pollution Abstracts; Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts; Water Resources Abstracts KW - USGS-WRI02-4261 KW - Aquifers KW - water quality KW - Groundwater quality KW - Organic compounds in water KW - Groundwater Pollution KW - Boreholes KW - Logging KW - Pollutants KW - USA, Pennsylvania, Bucks Cty. KW - Television KW - Geophysics KW - Aquifer flow KW - Superfund KW - logging KW - Volatile organic compounds in groundwater KW - USA, Pennsylvania, Montgomery Cty. KW - Water Level KW - boreholes KW - USA, Pennsylvania KW - Aquifer Testing KW - Organic Compounds KW - Contaminants KW - Volatile organic compounds KW - Water Resources KW - P 2000:FRESHWATER POLLUTION KW - SW 3020:Sources and fate of pollution KW - M2 556.3:Groundwater Hydrology (556.3) UR - http://libproxy.lib.unc.edu/login?url=http://search.proquest.com/docview/19926879?accountid=14244 L2 - http://vb3lk7eb4t.search.serialssolutions.com/?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&rfr_id=info:sid/Pollution+Abstracts&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=report&rft.jtitle=&rft.atitle=&rft.au=Bird%2C+PH%3BConger%2C+R+W&rft.aulast=Bird&rft.aufirst=PH&rft.date=2002-01-01&rft.volume=&rft.issue=&rft.spage=&rft.isbn=&rft.btitle=Evaluation+of+Borehole+Geophysical+Logging%2C+Aquifer-Isolation+Tests%2C+Distribution+of+Contaminants%2C+and+Water-Level+Measurements+at+the+North+Penn+Area+5+Superfund+Site%2C+Bucks+and+Montgomery+Counties%2C+Pennsylvania&rft.title=Evaluation+of+Borehole+Geophysical+Logging%2C+Aquifer-Isolation+Tests%2C+Distribution+of+Contaminants%2C+and+Water-Level+Measurements+at+the+North+Penn+Area+5+Superfund+Site%2C+Bucks+and+Montgomery+Counties%2C+Pennsylvania&rft.issn=&rft_id=info:doi/ LA - English DB - ProQuest Environmental Science Collection N1 - Date revised - 2006-12-01 N1 - SuppNotes - Order this product from NTIS by: phone at 1-800-553-NTIS (U.S. customers); (703)605-6000 (other countries); fax at (703)605-6900; e-mail: orders[at]ntis.gov. NTIS Prices: AV A06 AG: Agency USGS-WRI; This document is color dependent and/or in landscape layout. It is currently only available on CD-ROM. Prepared in cooperation with Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. N1 - Last updated - 2016-12-21 ER - TY - RPRT T1 - Water-Quality Assessment of the Rio Grande Valley, Colorado, New Mexico, and Texas: Surface-Water Quality, Shallow Ground-Water Quality, and Factors Affecting Water Quality in the Rincon Valley, South-Central New Mexico, 1994-95 AN - 19926846; 6261895 AB - The conceptual model of the Madison and Minnelusa aquifers in the Rapid City area synthesizes the physical geography, hydraulic properties, and ground-water flow components of these important aquifers. The Madison hydrogeologic unit includes the karstic Madison aquifer, which is defined as the upper, more permeable 100 to 200 ft of the Madison Limestone, and the Madison confining unit, which consists of the lower, less permeable part of the Madison Limestone and the Englewood Formation. Overlying the Madison hydrogeologic unit is the Minnelusa hydrogeologic unit, which includes the Minnelusa aquifer in the upper, more permeable 200 to 300 ft and the Minnelusa confining unit in the lower, less permeable part. The Madison and Minnelusa hydrogeologic units outcrop in the study area on the eastern flank of the Black Hills where recharge occurs from streamflow losses and areal recharge. The conceptual model describes streamflow recharge, areal recharge, ground-water flow, storage in aquifers and confining units, unsaturated areas, leakage between aquifers, discharge from artesian springs, and regional outflow. JF - Water Resources Investigations Report. United States Geological Survey AU - Anderholm, S K Y1 - 2002///0, PY - 2002 DA - 0, 2002 PB - United States Geological Survey KW - Pollution Abstracts; ASFA 3: Aquatic Pollution & Environmental Quality; Water Resources Abstracts KW - USGS-WRI-02-4188 KW - Aquifers KW - Water Pollution KW - Hydraulics KW - hills KW - water quality KW - Limestone KW - Surface water KW - outflow KW - Water resources KW - Groundwater Pollution KW - Surface Water KW - Freshwater KW - USA, Wisconsin, Madison KW - Water quality KW - Flow rates KW - Ground water KW - Geography KW - Hydraulic Properties KW - Urban areas KW - Rivers KW - USA, New Mexico KW - Leakage KW - USA, Texas, Rio Grande R. KW - valleys KW - River discharge KW - Streamflow KW - Model Studies KW - Storage KW - USA, Colorado KW - Geohydrology KW - USA, Colorado, Rio Grande R. KW - USA, South Dakota, Black Hills KW - USA, Texas KW - USA, New Mexico, Rio Grande R. KW - Groundwater KW - Groundwater Recharge KW - Groundwater Movement KW - P 2000:FRESHWATER POLLUTION KW - SW 3020:Sources and fate of pollution KW - Q5 08501:General UR - http://libproxy.lib.unc.edu/login?url=http://search.proquest.com/docview/19926846?accountid=14244 L2 - http://vb3lk7eb4t.search.serialssolutions.com/?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&rfr_id=info:sid/Aquatic+Science+%26+Fisheries+Abstracts+%28ASFA%29+3%3A+Aquatic+Pollution+%26+Environmental+Quality&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=report&rft.jtitle=&rft.atitle=&rft.au=Anderholm%2C+S+K&rft.aulast=Anderholm&rft.aufirst=S&rft.date=2002-01-01&rft.volume=&rft.issue=&rft.spage=&rft.isbn=&rft.btitle=Water-Quality+Assessment+of+the+Rio+Grande+Valley%2C+Colorado%2C+New+Mexico%2C+and+Texas%3A+Surface-Water+Quality%2C+Shallow+Ground-Water+Quality%2C+and+Factors+Affecting+Water+Quality+in+the+Rincon+Valley%2C+South-Central+New+Mexico%2C+1994-95&rft.title=Water-Quality+Assessment+of+the+Rio+Grande+Valley%2C+Colorado%2C+New+Mexico%2C+and+Texas%3A+Surface-Water+Quality%2C+Shallow+Ground-Water+Quality%2C+and+Factors+Affecting+Water+Quality+in+the+Rincon+Valley%2C+South-Central+New+Mexico%2C+1994-95&rft.issn=&rft_id=info:doi/ LA - English DB - ProQuest Environmental Science Collection N1 - Date revised - 2006-10-01 N1 - SuppNotes - Order this product from NTIS by: phone at 1-800-553-NTIS (U.S. customers); (703)605-6000 (other countries); fax at (703)605-6900; e-mail: orders[at]ntis.gov. NTIS Prices: AV A07; This document is color dependent and/or in landscape layout. It is currently available on CD-ROM and paper only. Sponsored by Geological Survey, Denver, CO. National Water-Quality Assessment Program. N1 - Last updated - 2016-12-21 ER - TY - RPRT T1 - Guidance on the Use of Passive-Vapor-Diffusion Samplers to Detect Volatile Organic Compounds in Ground-Water-Discharge Areas, and Example Applications in New England AN - 19926808; 6261881 AB - Polyethylene-membrane passive-vapor diffusion samplers, or PVD samplers, have been shown to be an effective and economical reconnaissance tool for detecting and identifying volatile organic compounds (VOCs) in bottom sediments of surface-water bodies in areas of ground-water discharge. The PVD samplers consist of an empty glass vial enclosed in two layers of polyethylene membrane tubing. When samplers are placed in contaminated sediments, the air in the vial equilibrates with VOCs in pore water. Analysis of the vapor indicates the presence or absence of VOCs and the likely magnitude of concentrations in pore water. detected to more than 1,000,000 parts per billion by volume. These results provided insights about contaminant distributions and ground-water-flow patterns in discharge areas, and have guided the design of focused characterization activities. JF - Water Resources Investigations Report. United States Geological Survey AU - Church, P E AU - Vroblesky, DA AU - Lyford, F P AU - Willey, R E Y1 - 2002///0, PY - 2002 DA - 0, 2002 PB - United States Geological Survey KW - Pollution Abstracts; Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts; ASFA 3: Aquatic Pollution & Environmental Quality; Water Resources Abstracts KW - USGS-WRI-02-4186 KW - Pore water KW - Groundwater Discharge KW - Surface water KW - Freshwater KW - Distribution Patterns KW - Vapors KW - Pollutants KW - USA, New England KW - Economics KW - Ground water KW - Volatile compounds KW - Sediment Contamination KW - Diffusion KW - Sediment pollution KW - Membranes KW - Groundwater flow KW - Volatile organic compounds in groundwater KW - Interstitial Water KW - Samplers KW - Sediments KW - Air pollution KW - Groundwater pollution KW - Organic Compounds KW - Organic compounds KW - Groundwater KW - Groundwater Movement KW - Volatile organic compounds KW - Q5 08503:Characteristics, behavior and fate KW - P 2000:FRESHWATER POLLUTION KW - SW 3010:Identification of pollutants KW - M2 556.34:Groundwater Flow (556.34) UR - http://libproxy.lib.unc.edu/login?url=http://search.proquest.com/docview/19926808?accountid=14244 L2 - http://vb3lk7eb4t.search.serialssolutions.com/?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&rfr_id=info:sid/Aquatic+Science+%26+Fisheries+Abstracts+%28ASFA%29+3%3A+Aquatic+Pollution+%26+Environmental+Quality&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=report&rft.jtitle=&rft.atitle=&rft.au=Church%2C+P+E%3BVroblesky%2C+DA%3BLyford%2C+F+P%3BWilley%2C+R+E&rft.aulast=Church&rft.aufirst=P&rft.date=2002-01-01&rft.volume=&rft.issue=&rft.spage=&rft.isbn=&rft.btitle=Guidance+on+the+Use+of+Passive-Vapor-Diffusion+Samplers+to+Detect+Volatile+Organic+Compounds+in+Ground-Water-Discharge+Areas%2C+and+Example+Applications+in+New+England&rft.title=Guidance+on+the+Use+of+Passive-Vapor-Diffusion+Samplers+to+Detect+Volatile+Organic+Compounds+in+Ground-Water-Discharge+Areas%2C+and+Example+Applications+in+New+England&rft.issn=&rft_id=info:doi/ LA - English DB - ProQuest Environmental Science Collection N1 - Date revised - 2006-10-01 N1 - SuppNotes - Order this product from NTIS by: phone at 1-800-553-NTIS (U.S. customers); (703)605-6000 (other countries); fax at (703)605-6900; e-mail: orders[at]ntis.gov. NTIS Prices: AV A06; This document is color dependent and/or in landscape layout. It is currently available on CD-ROM and paper only. Prepared in cooperation with Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. N1 - Last updated - 2016-12-21 ER - TY - RPRT T1 - Simulation of Ground-Water Flow in the Silurian-Devonian Aquifer, Cedar Falls, Iowa AN - 19926736; 6261840 AB - The Silurian-Devonian bedrock aquifer in the Cedar Falls, Iowa, area provides large quantities of good quality ground water for municipal water suppliers as well as private residential users. The highly transmissive nature of the Silurian-Devonian aquifer material, due to fractures and karst features in the area and areas of thin, overlying Quaternary deposits, results in a groundwater supply vulnerable to contamination. To address these concerns, the US. Geological Survey, in cooperation with Cedar Falls Utilities, conducted a study from 1998 to 2001 to evaluate the hydrogeology and simulate the ground-water flow in the Silurian-Devonian bedrock aquifer in the Cedar Falls area. JF - Water Resources Investigations Report. United States Geological Survey AU - Turco, MJ Y1 - 2002///0, PY - 2002 DA - 0, 2002 PB - United States Geological Survey KW - Pollution Abstracts; Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts; Water Resources Abstracts KW - USGS-WRI-02-4081 KW - Aquifers KW - Municipal water supplies KW - geological surveys KW - Hydrogeology KW - Water Supply KW - Groundwater Pollution KW - Karst KW - Utilities KW - Quaternary deposits KW - Municipal Water KW - Aquifer flow KW - Bedrock KW - quaternary KW - Groundwater flow KW - Simulation KW - Groundwater supply KW - Transmissivity KW - Numerical simulations KW - USA, Iowa KW - Groundwater models KW - Geohydrology KW - Groundwater pollution KW - Water wells KW - vulnerability KW - Groundwater KW - Groundwater Movement KW - P 2000:FRESHWATER POLLUTION KW - SW 0840:Groundwater KW - M2 556.34:Groundwater Flow (556.34) UR - http://libproxy.lib.unc.edu/login?url=http://search.proquest.com/docview/19926736?accountid=14244 L2 - http://vb3lk7eb4t.search.serialssolutions.com/?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&rfr_id=info:sid/Pollution+Abstracts&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=report&rft.jtitle=&rft.atitle=&rft.au=Turco%2C+MJ&rft.aulast=Turco&rft.aufirst=MJ&rft.date=2002-01-01&rft.volume=&rft.issue=&rft.spage=&rft.isbn=&rft.btitle=Simulation+of+Ground-Water+Flow+in+the+Silurian-Devonian+Aquifer%2C+Cedar+Falls%2C+Iowa&rft.title=Simulation+of+Ground-Water+Flow+in+the+Silurian-Devonian+Aquifer%2C+Cedar+Falls%2C+Iowa&rft.issn=&rft_id=info:doi/ LA - English DB - ProQuest Environmental Science Collection N1 - Date revised - 2006-12-01 N1 - SuppNotes - Order this product from NTIS by: phone at 1-800-553-NTIS (U.S. customers); (703)605-6000 (other countries); fax at (703)605-6900; e-mail: orders[at]ntis.gov. NTIS Prices: AV A04; This document is color dependent and/or in landscape layout. It is currently only available on CD-ROM. N1 - Last updated - 2016-12-21 ER - TY - RPRT T1 - Water Quality of the Mahoning River and Selected Tributaries in Youngstown, Ohio AN - 19926383; 6261780 AB - The lower reaches of the Mahoning River in Youngstown, Ohio, have been characterized by the Ohio Environmental Protection Agency (OEPA) as historically having poor water quality. Most wastewater-treatment plants (WWTPs) in the watershed did not provide secondary sewage treatment until the late 1980s. By the late 1990s, the Mahoning River still received sewer overflow discharges from 101 locations within the city of Youngstown, Ohio. The Mahoning River in Youngstown and Mill Creek, a principal tributary to the Mahoning River in Youngstown, have not met biotic index criteria since the earliest published assessment by OEPA in1980. Youngstown and the OEPA are working together toward the goal of meeting water-quality standards in the Mahoning River. The U.S. Geological Survey collected information to help both parties assess water quality in the area of Youngstown and to estimate bacteria and inorganic nitrogen contributions from sewer-overflow discharges to the Mahoning River. Two monitoring networks were established in the lower Mahoning River: the first to evaluate hydrology and microbiological and chemical water quality and the second to assess indices of fish and aquatic-macroinver tebrate- community health. Water samples and water-quality data were collected from May through October 1999 and 2000to evaluate where, when, and for how long water quality was affected by sewer- overflow discharges. Water samples were collected during dry- and wet-weather flow, and biotic indices were assessed during the first year(1999). JF - Water Resources Investigations Report. United States Geological Survey AU - Stoeckel, D M AU - Covert, SA Y1 - 2002///0, PY - 2002 DA - 0, 2002 SP - 56 PB - United States Geological Survey KW - Pollution Abstracts; ASFA 3: Aquatic Pollution & Environmental Quality; Water Resources Abstracts KW - USGS-WRI-02-4122 KW - Historical account KW - water quality KW - Pollution monitoring KW - Water sampling KW - Water Pollution Sources KW - geological surveys KW - Freshwater KW - Water quality KW - Watersheds KW - Wastewater Pollution KW - Water Quality Standards KW - Water treatment KW - Sewers KW - Hydrology KW - Stream Pollution KW - Sewage treatment KW - Pollution data KW - Urban areas KW - Freshwater pollution KW - Rivers KW - Bacteria KW - Water Quality KW - Water quality standards KW - Pollution surveys KW - EPA KW - USA, Ohio, Mahoning R. KW - overflow KW - Wastewater Disposal KW - Fish KW - USA, Ohio KW - Monitoring KW - Waste water KW - Wastewater Treatment KW - Nitrogen KW - P 2000:FRESHWATER POLLUTION KW - SW 3020:Sources and fate of pollution KW - Q5 08502:Methods and instruments UR - http://libproxy.lib.unc.edu/login?url=http://search.proquest.com/docview/19926383?accountid=14244 L2 - http://vb3lk7eb4t.search.serialssolutions.com/?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&rfr_id=info:sid/Aquatic+Science+%26+Fisheries+Abstracts+%28ASFA%29+3%3A+Aquatic+Pollution+%26+Environmental+Quality&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=report&rft.jtitle=&rft.atitle=&rft.au=Stoeckel%2C+D+M%3BCovert%2C+SA&rft.aulast=Stoeckel&rft.aufirst=D&rft.date=2002-01-01&rft.volume=&rft.issue=&rft.spage=56&rft.isbn=&rft.btitle=Water+Quality+of+the+Mahoning+River+and+Selected+Tributaries+in+Youngstown%2C+Ohio&rft.title=Water+Quality+of+the+Mahoning+River+and+Selected+Tributaries+in+Youngstown%2C+Ohio&rft.issn=&rft_id=info:doi/ LA - English DB - ProQuest Environmental Science Collection N1 - Date revised - 2005-08-01 N1 - SuppNotes - Product reproduced from digital image. Order this product from NTIS by: phone at 1-800-553-NTIS (U.S. customers); (703)605-6000 (other countries); fax at (703)605-6900; e-mail: orders[at]ntis.gov. NTIS Prices: PC A05/MF A01 N1 - Last updated - 2016-12-21 ER - TY - RPRT T1 - Trends in Surface-Water Quality in Connecticut, 1989-98 AN - 19926294; 6261735 AB - A trend in surface-water quality is a change over time in the biological, chemical, or physical characteristics of the water. Identification of water-quality trends is useful in targeting areas for further study, investigating possible causes of changes in water quality, planning remediation of water-quality problems, and evaluating effects of remediation. The U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) and the Connecticut Department of Environmental Protection (DEP) have worked together during the last three decades to monitor water-quality conditions in Connecticut. The long-term cooperative program between USGS and the DEP has provided a substantial database of water-quality records that can be used for trend analysis. The data from this network are suitable for a statewide trend study on a number of different physical properties, chemical constituents, and bacteria. In 1998, the USGS and the Connecticut DEP began a cooperative project to assess recent trends in surface-water quality in Connecticut. JF - Water Resources Investigations Report. United States Geological Survey AU - Colombo, MJ AU - Todd Trench, EC Y1 - 2002///0, PY - 2002 DA - 0, 2002 SP - 50 PB - United States Geological Survey KW - Pollution Abstracts; Microbiology Abstracts B: Bacteriology; ASFA 3: Aquatic Pollution & Environmental Quality; Water Resources Abstracts KW - USGS-WRI-02-4012 KW - Water Pollution KW - water quality KW - Pollution monitoring KW - Bioremediation KW - USA, Connecticut KW - Water Pollution Sources KW - Surface water KW - geological surveys KW - Water resources KW - Freshwater KW - Chemical Properties KW - Water quality KW - Computer programs KW - Long-term planning KW - Biological Properties KW - Physical Properties KW - Cooperatives KW - cooperatives KW - Rivers KW - Physical characteristics KW - Data processing KW - Water Quality KW - Environmental impact KW - Biological properties KW - Water pollution KW - Environmental protection KW - Physical properties KW - Databases KW - Remediation KW - Chemical properties KW - Water Resources KW - P 2000:FRESHWATER POLLUTION KW - SW 3010:Identification of pollutants KW - Q5 08502:Methods and instruments KW - J 02450:Ecology UR - http://libproxy.lib.unc.edu/login?url=http://search.proquest.com/docview/19926294?accountid=14244 L2 - http://vb3lk7eb4t.search.serialssolutions.com/?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&rfr_id=info:sid/Aquatic+Science+%26+Fisheries+Abstracts+%28ASFA%29+3%3A+Aquatic+Pollution+%26+Environmental+Quality&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=report&rft.jtitle=&rft.atitle=&rft.au=Colombo%2C+MJ%3BTodd+Trench%2C+EC&rft.aulast=Colombo&rft.aufirst=MJ&rft.date=2002-01-01&rft.volume=&rft.issue=&rft.spage=50&rft.isbn=&rft.btitle=Trends+in+Surface-Water+Quality+in+Connecticut%2C+1989-98&rft.title=Trends+in+Surface-Water+Quality+in+Connecticut%2C+1989-98&rft.issn=&rft_id=info:doi/ LA - English DB - ProQuest Environmental Science Collection N1 - Date revised - 2006-08-01 N1 - SuppNotes - Product reproduced from digital image. Order this product from NTIS by: phone at 1-800-553-NTIS (U.S. customers); (703)605-6000 (other countries); fax at (703)605-6900; e-mail: orders[at]ntis.gov. NTIS Prices: PC A04/MF A01; Prepared in cooperation with Connecticut Dept. of Environmental Protection, Hartford. N1 - Last updated - 2016-12-21 ER - TY - RPRT T1 - Organochlorine Compounds and Trace Elements in Fish Tissue and Streambed Sediment in the Mobile River Basin, Alabama, Mississippi, and Georgia, 1998. National Water Quality Assessment Program AN - 19926259; 6261807 AB - During the summer of 1998, as part of the National Water- Quality Assessment Program, a survey was conducted to determine which organochlorine compounds and trace elements occur in fish tissues and streambed sediments in the Mobile River Basin, which includes parts of Alabama, Mississippi, Georgia, and Tennessee. The data collected were compared to guidelines related to wildlife, land use, and to 1991 and 1994 National Water-Quality Assessment Program Study-Unit data. Twenty-one sites were sampled in subbasins of the Mobile River Basin. The subbasins ranged in size from about 9 to 22,000 square miles and were dominated by either a single land use or a combination of land uses. The major land-use categories were urban, agriculture, and forest. JF - Water Resources Investigations Report. United States Geological Survey AU - Zappia, H Y1 - 2002///0, PY - 2002 DA - 0, 2002 PB - United States Geological Survey KW - Pollution Abstracts; ASFA 3: Aquatic Pollution & Environmental Quality; Water Resources Abstracts KW - USGS-WRI-02-4160 KW - Land Use KW - Tissues KW - water quality KW - River Basins KW - USA, Georgia, Mobile R. basin KW - Organochlorine compounds KW - Water Pollution Sources KW - Fluvial Sediments KW - Forests KW - Freshwater KW - Freshwater fish KW - Water quality KW - Streams KW - Trace elements KW - guidelines KW - urban agriculture KW - Sediment Contamination KW - USA, Tennesee, Mobile R. basin KW - Sediment pollution KW - Chlorine compounds KW - Wildlife KW - Water Quality KW - USA, Georgia KW - Trace Elements KW - River basins KW - Pollution surveys KW - Land use KW - USA, Tennessee KW - Bioaccumulation KW - USA, Alabama, Mobile R. KW - Quality control KW - USA, Mississippi KW - summer KW - Fish KW - USA, Mississippi, Mobile R. basin KW - Q5 08503:Characteristics, behavior and fate KW - P 2000:FRESHWATER POLLUTION KW - SW 3020:Sources and fate of pollution UR - http://libproxy.lib.unc.edu/login?url=http://search.proquest.com/docview/19926259?accountid=14244 L2 - http://vb3lk7eb4t.search.serialssolutions.com/?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&rfr_id=info:sid/Aquatic+Science+%26+Fisheries+Abstracts+%28ASFA%29+3%3A+Aquatic+Pollution+%26+Environmental+Quality&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=report&rft.jtitle=&rft.atitle=&rft.au=Zappia%2C+H&rft.aulast=Zappia&rft.aufirst=H&rft.date=2002-01-01&rft.volume=&rft.issue=&rft.spage=&rft.isbn=&rft.btitle=Organochlorine+Compounds+and+Trace+Elements+in+Fish+Tissue+and+Streambed+Sediment+in+the+Mobile+River+Basin%2C+Alabama%2C+Mississippi%2C+and+Georgia%2C+1998.+National+Water+Quality+Assessment+Program&rft.title=Organochlorine+Compounds+and+Trace+Elements+in+Fish+Tissue+and+Streambed+Sediment+in+the+Mobile+River+Basin%2C+Alabama%2C+Mississippi%2C+and+Georgia%2C+1998.+National+Water+Quality+Assessment+Program&rft.issn=&rft_id=info:doi/ LA - English DB - ProQuest Environmental Science Collection N1 - Date revised - 2005-08-01 N1 - SuppNotes - Availble on CD-ROM and in paper copy only. Order this product from NTIS by: phone at 1-800-553-NTIS (U.S. customers); (703)605- 6000 (other countries); fax at (703)605-6900; e-mail: orders[at]ntis.gov. NTIS Prices: AV A06; This document is color dependent and/or in landscape layout. It is currently only available on CD-ROM. N1 - Last updated - 2016-12-21 ER - TY - RPRT T1 - Water-Quality Assessment of Part of the Upper Mississippi River Basin, Minnesota and Wisconsin: Trace Elements in Streambed Sediment and Fish Livers, 1995-96. National Water-Quality Assessment Program AN - 19926258; 6261733 AB - Trace elements were analyzed in streambed sediment and fish livers in part of the Upper Mississippi River Basin as part of the U.S. Geological Survey's National Water-Quality Assessment Program. The purpose of this report was to describe the occurrence and distribution of trace elements, describe the relations of concentrations measured to natural and anthropogenic factors, and describe any relation between concentrations in streambed sediment and fish livers. The study unit included the part of the Upper Mississippi River Basin from the river's source in northern Minnesota to the outlet of Lake Pepin, a natural lake on the river located near Red Wing, Minnesota. Streambed sediment samples were collected from 27 sites located throughout the study unit, and fish were obtained from 25 sites. JF - Water Resources Investigations Report. United States Geological Survey AU - Kroening, SE AU - Fallon, J D AU - Lee, KE Y1 - 2002///0, PY - 2002 DA - 0, 2002 SP - 40 PB - United States Geological Survey KW - Pollution Abstracts; ASFA 3: Aquatic Pollution & Environmental Quality; Water Resources Abstracts KW - USGS-WRI-00-4031 KW - water quality KW - Pollution monitoring KW - River Basins KW - Water Pollution Sources KW - Fluvial Sediments KW - Anthropogenic factors KW - Freshwater KW - USA, Wisconsin KW - Freshwater fish KW - Water quality KW - Streams KW - Trace elements KW - Lakes KW - Assessments KW - Sediment Contamination KW - Geology KW - Sediment pollution KW - anthropogenic factors KW - Water Quality KW - USA, Minnesota, Pepin L. KW - Trace Elements KW - River basins KW - USA, Mississippi R. basin KW - USA, Minnesota KW - Water pollution KW - Bioaccumulation KW - Liver KW - Fish KW - Q5 08503:Characteristics, behavior and fate KW - P 2000:FRESHWATER POLLUTION KW - SW 3020:Sources and fate of pollution UR - http://libproxy.lib.unc.edu/login?url=http://search.proquest.com/docview/19926258?accountid=14244 L2 - http://vb3lk7eb4t.search.serialssolutions.com/?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&rfr_id=info:sid/Aquatic+Science+%26+Fisheries+Abstracts+%28ASFA%29+3%3A+Aquatic+Pollution+%26+Environmental+Quality&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=report&rft.jtitle=&rft.atitle=&rft.au=Kroening%2C+SE%3BFallon%2C+J+D%3BLee%2C+KE&rft.aulast=Kroening&rft.aufirst=SE&rft.date=2002-01-01&rft.volume=&rft.issue=&rft.spage=40&rft.isbn=&rft.btitle=Water-Quality+Assessment+of+Part+of+the+Upper+Mississippi+River+Basin%2C+Minnesota+and+Wisconsin%3A+Trace+Elements+in+Streambed+Sediment+and+Fish+Livers%2C+1995-96.+National+Water-Quality+Assessment+Program&rft.title=Water-Quality+Assessment+of+Part+of+the+Upper+Mississippi+River+Basin%2C+Minnesota+and+Wisconsin%3A+Trace+Elements+in+Streambed+Sediment+and+Fish+Livers%2C+1995-96.+National+Water-Quality+Assessment+Program&rft.issn=&rft_id=info:doi/ LA - English DB - ProQuest Environmental Science Collection N1 - Date revised - 2005-08-01 N1 - SuppNotes - Product reproduced from digital image. Order this product from NTIS by: phone at 1-800-553-NTIS (U.S. customers); (703)605-6000 (other countries); fax at (703)605-6900; e-mail: orders[at]ntis.gov. NTIS Prices: PC A04/MF A01 N1 - Last updated - 2016-12-21 ER - TY - RPRT T1 - Metal Concentrations and Sources in the Miller Creek Watershed, Park County, Montana, August 2000 AN - 19926226; 6261714 AB - The purpose of this report is to characterize metal concentrations and identify possible sources contributing metals to Miller Creek during low flow. This study was conducted during August 28-31, 2000. Surface-water samples were collected at 55 mainstem and inflow sites along Miller Creek (fig. 2) and analyzed for pH, major ions, and metals. Streambed-sediment samples were collected at 16 sites and analyzed for metal concentrations. JF - Water Resources Investigations Report. United States Geological Survey Y1 - 2002///0, PY - 2002 DA - 0, 2002 PB - United States Geological Survey KW - Pollution Abstracts; ASFA 3: Aquatic Pollution & Environmental Quality; Water Resources Abstracts KW - USGS-WRI-02-4148 KW - Pollution monitoring KW - Water Pollution Sources KW - Surface water KW - Water resources KW - Stream pollution KW - Freshwater KW - Water quality KW - Watersheds KW - Streams KW - Metal concentrations KW - Sediment Contamination KW - inflow KW - USA, Montana KW - pH KW - Rivers KW - Ions KW - Metals KW - Sediment pollution KW - Fate of Pollutants KW - Low Flow KW - Hydrogen Ion Concentration KW - Water pollution KW - P 2000:FRESHWATER POLLUTION KW - SW 3020:Sources and fate of pollution KW - Q5 08502:Methods and instruments UR - http://libproxy.lib.unc.edu/login?url=http://search.proquest.com/docview/19926226?accountid=14244 L2 - http://vb3lk7eb4t.search.serialssolutions.com/?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&rfr_id=info:sid/Aquatic+Science+%26+Fisheries+Abstracts+%28ASFA%29+3%3A+Aquatic+Pollution+%26+Environmental+Quality&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=report&rft.jtitle=&rft.atitle=&rft.au=&rft.aulast=&rft.aufirst=&rft.date=2002-01-01&rft.volume=&rft.issue=&rft.spage=&rft.isbn=&rft.btitle=Metal+Concentrations+and+Sources+in+the+Miller+Creek+Watershed%2C+Park+County%2C+Montana%2C+August+2000&rft.title=Metal+Concentrations+and+Sources+in+the+Miller+Creek+Watershed%2C+Park+County%2C+Montana%2C+August+2000&rft.issn=&rft_id=info:doi/ LA - English DB - ProQuest Environmental Science Collection N1 - Date revised - 2006-09-01 N1 - SuppNotes - Available on CD-ROM and in paper copy only. Order this product from NTIS by: phone at 1-800-553-NTIS (U.S. customers); (703)605- 6000 (other countries); fax at (703)605-6900; e-mail: orders[at]ntis.gov. NTIS Prices: AV A04; This document is color dependent and/or in landscape layout. It is currently only available on CD-ROM. Prepared in cooperation with Forest Service, Portland, OR. Pacific Northwest Region. N1 - Last updated - 2016-12-21 ER - TY - RPRT T1 - Water-Quality Data Analysis of the Upper Gunnison River Watershed, Colorado, 1989-99 AN - 19926192; 6261751 AB - This report presents the results of the compilation and analysis of available water-quality data for the upper Gunnison River watershed. The retrospective water-quality analysis was limited to water-quality data in an electronic (computerized database) format and included only samples gathered from October 1969 to December 1999. These water-quality data were gathered and reported by the USGS, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA), Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment (CDPHE), National Park Service (NPS), U.S. Forest Service (USFS), Colorado Department of Natural Resources, and the Bureau of Reclamation. For selected water-quality properties and constituents in the watershed, this report presents a data summary, spatial distribution evaluation, comparison to Federal and State standards, and analyzes relations between land-use practices and water quality. JF - Water Resources Investigations Report. United States Geological Survey AU - Gurdak, J J AU - Greve, AI AU - Spahr, N E Y1 - 2002///0, PY - 2002 DA - 0, 2002 PB - United States Geological Survey KW - Pollution Abstracts; ASFA 3: Aquatic Pollution & Environmental Quality; Water Resources Abstracts KW - USGS-WRI-02-4001 KW - Land Use KW - Water Pollution KW - water quality KW - Pollution monitoring KW - Resource management KW - Geographical distribution KW - reclamation KW - national parks KW - Forests KW - Freshwater KW - Spatial Distribution KW - Watersheds KW - Water quality KW - Public health KW - spatial distribution KW - Natural Resources KW - Water Quality Standards KW - Public Health KW - USA, Colorado, Gunnison Gorge, Gunnison R. KW - Pollution data KW - Data Collections KW - Rivers KW - Water Quality KW - Environmental Protection KW - Data collections KW - Water quality standards KW - Pollution surveys KW - Land use KW - Environmental protection KW - EPA KW - USA, Colorado KW - USA, Colorado, Gunnison R. KW - Natural resources KW - P 2000:FRESHWATER POLLUTION KW - SW 3020:Sources and fate of pollution KW - Q5 08502:Methods and instruments UR - http://libproxy.lib.unc.edu/login?url=http://search.proquest.com/docview/19926192?accountid=14244 L2 - http://vb3lk7eb4t.search.serialssolutions.com/?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&rfr_id=info:sid/Aquatic+Science+%26+Fisheries+Abstracts+%28ASFA%29+3%3A+Aquatic+Pollution+%26+Environmental+Quality&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=report&rft.jtitle=&rft.atitle=&rft.au=Gurdak%2C+J+J%3BGreve%2C+AI%3BSpahr%2C+N+E&rft.aulast=Gurdak&rft.aufirst=J&rft.date=2002-01-01&rft.volume=&rft.issue=&rft.spage=&rft.isbn=&rft.btitle=Water-Quality+Data+Analysis+of+the+Upper+Gunnison+River+Watershed%2C+Colorado%2C+1989-99&rft.title=Water-Quality+Data+Analysis+of+the+Upper+Gunnison+River+Watershed%2C+Colorado%2C+1989-99&rft.issn=&rft_id=info:doi/ LA - English DB - ProQuest Environmental Science Collection N1 - Date revised - 2005-08-01 N1 - SuppNotes - Order this product from NTIS by: phone at 1-800-553-NTIS (U.S. customers); (703)605-6000 (other countries); fax at (703)605-6900; e-mail: orders[at]ntis.gov. NTIS Prices: AV A05; This document is color dependent and/or in landscape layout. It is currently only available on CD-ROM. Prepared in cooperation with Bureau of Reclamation, Denver, CO. Colorado River Water Conservation District. N1 - Last updated - 2016-12-21 ER - TY - RPRT T1 - Occurence and Distribution of Microbiological Contamination and Enteric Viruses in Shallow Ground Water in Baltimore and Harford Counties, Maryland AN - 19926122; 6261723 AB - The U.S. Geological Survey, in cooperation with the Maryland Department of the Environment and the Wisconsin State Laboratory of Hygiene, conducted a study to characterize the occurrence and distribution of viral contamination in small (withdrawing less than 10,000 gallons per day) public water supply wells screened in the shallow aquifer in the Piedmont Physiographic province in Baltimore and Harford Counties, Maryland. Two hundred sixty-three small public water-supply wells were in operation in these counties during the spring of 2000. Ninety-one of these sites were selected for sampling using a methodology that distributed the samples evenly over the population and the spatial extent of the study area. Each site, and its potential susceptibility to microbiological contamination, was evaluated with regard to hole depth, casing interval, and open interval. Each site was evaluated using characteristics such as on-site geology and on-site land use. JF - Water Resources Investigations Report. United States Geological Survey AU - Banks, WSL AU - Battigelli, DA Y1 - 2002///0, PY - 2002 DA - 0, 2002 PB - United States Geological Survey KW - Pollution Abstracts; Microbiology Abstracts A: Industrial & Applied Microbiology; Virology & AIDS Abstracts; Water Resources Abstracts KW - USGS-WRI-01-4216 KW - Aquifers KW - Springs KW - Contamination KW - USA, Maryland, Harford Cty. KW - Cooperation KW - Viruses KW - geological surveys KW - Water Supply KW - Water resources KW - Groundwater Pollution KW - USA, Maryland, Baltimore KW - Microbial contamination KW - USA, Wisconsin KW - Spatial Distribution KW - Water supplies KW - Well Water KW - Microbiological Studies KW - Ground water KW - Geology KW - Sampling KW - USA, Maryland, Baltimore Cty. KW - physiographic provinces KW - Land use KW - Groundwater pollution KW - Water wells KW - Groundwater KW - Hygiene KW - A 01340:Antibiotics & Antimicrobials KW - V 22490:Miscellaneous KW - P 2000:FRESHWATER POLLUTION KW - SW 3020:Sources and fate of pollution UR - http://libproxy.lib.unc.edu/login?url=http://search.proquest.com/docview/19926122?accountid=14244 L2 - http://vb3lk7eb4t.search.serialssolutions.com/?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&rfr_id=info:sid/Industrial+and+Applied+Microbiology+Abstracts+%28Microbiology+A%29&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=report&rft.jtitle=&rft.atitle=&rft.au=Banks%2C+WSL%3BBattigelli%2C+DA&rft.aulast=Banks&rft.aufirst=WSL&rft.date=2002-01-01&rft.volume=&rft.issue=&rft.spage=&rft.isbn=&rft.btitle=Occurence+and+Distribution+of+Microbiological+Contamination+and+Enteric+Viruses+in+Shallow+Ground+Water+in+Baltimore+and+Harford+Counties%2C+Maryland&rft.title=Occurence+and+Distribution+of+Microbiological+Contamination+and+Enteric+Viruses+in+Shallow+Ground+Water+in+Baltimore+and+Harford+Counties%2C+Maryland&rft.issn=&rft_id=info:doi/ LA - English DB - ProQuest Environmental Science Collection N1 - Date revised - 2006-12-01 N1 - SuppNotes - Order this product from NTIS by: phone at 1-800-553-NTIS (U.S. customers); (703)605-6000 (other countries); fax at (703)605-6900; e-mail: orders[at]ntis.gov. NTIS Prices: AV A04; This document is color dependent and/or in landscape layout. It is currently only available on CD-ROM. Prepared in cooperation with Maryland Dept. of the Environment, Baltimore. N1 - Last updated - 2016-12-21 ER - TY - RPRT T1 - Geology, Hydrology, and Water Quality in the Vicinity of a Brownfield Redevelopment Site in Canton, Illinois AN - 19925975; 6261515 AB - This report describes the results of an investigation of the hydrogeology and water quality in the vicinity of the Canton Brownfield site. The results of geophysical logging, two series of water-level measurements, slug testing, and water-quality sampling from 11 monitoring wells installed in the study area for this investigation are presented. In addition, this report presents the results of geotechnical, mineralogic, and stratigraphic analysis of lithologic sampling from soil borings in the study area. The report describes the geology, stratigraphy, and hydrology in the study area, identifies the directions and estimates the rate of ground-water flow, describes ground-water quality, and identifies potential factors that affect hydrology and water quality in the unconsolidated deposits underlying the study area. JF - Open-file Report. U.S. Geological Survey AU - Kay, R T AU - Cornue, D B AU - Ursic, J R Y1 - 2002///0, PY - 2002 DA - 0, 2002 SP - 42 PB - United States Geological Survey KW - Pollution Abstracts; ASFA 3: Aquatic Pollution & Environmental Quality; ASFA 2: Ocean Technology Policy & Non-Living Resources; Sustainability Science Abstracts; Water Resources Abstracts KW - USGS-OFR-01-307 KW - Water Pollution KW - water quality KW - Development projects KW - Pollution monitoring KW - Pollution clean-up KW - Freshwater KW - Water quality KW - Restoration KW - Soil KW - Ground water KW - Hydrology KW - Geology KW - Sampling KW - Geophysics KW - Land reclamation KW - Brownfields KW - stratigraphy KW - USA, Illinois KW - Water Quality KW - Stratigraphy KW - logging KW - Land use KW - Water pollution KW - Environmental protection KW - Environmental restoration KW - Monitoring KW - Groundwater KW - Groundwater Movement KW - soil KW - Q5 08503:Characteristics, behavior and fate KW - P 2000:FRESHWATER POLLUTION KW - M3 1010:Issues in Sustainable Development KW - SW 3010:Identification of pollutants KW - Q2 09171:Dynamics of lakes and rivers UR - http://libproxy.lib.unc.edu/login?url=http://search.proquest.com/docview/19925975?accountid=14244 L2 - http://vb3lk7eb4t.search.serialssolutions.com/?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&rfr_id=info:sid/Aquatic+Science+%26+Fisheries+Abstracts+%28ASFA%29+3%3A+Aquatic+Pollution+%26+Environmental+Quality&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=report&rft.jtitle=&rft.atitle=&rft.au=Kay%2C+R+T%3BCornue%2C+D+B%3BUrsic%2C+J+R&rft.aulast=Kay&rft.aufirst=R&rft.date=2002-01-01&rft.volume=&rft.issue=&rft.spage=42&rft.isbn=&rft.btitle=Geology%2C+Hydrology%2C+and+Water+Quality+in+the+Vicinity+of+a+Brownfield+Redevelopment+Site+in+Canton%2C+Illinois&rft.title=Geology%2C+Hydrology%2C+and+Water+Quality+in+the+Vicinity+of+a+Brownfield+Redevelopment+Site+in+Canton%2C+Illinois&rft.issn=&rft_id=info:doi/ LA - English DB - ProQuest Environmental Science Collection N1 - Date revised - 2007-02-01 N1 - SuppNotes - Order this product from NTIS by: Phone at 1-800-553-NTIS (U.S. Customers); (703)605-6000 (Other countries); fax at (703)605-6900; email: orders[at]ntis.gov N1 - Last updated - 2016-12-21 ER - TY - RPRT T1 - Detection of Fresh Gound Water and a Contaminant Plume Beneath Red Brook Harbor, Cape Cod, Massachusetts. 2000 AN - 19925732; 6261865 AB - Trichloroethene and tetrachloroethene were detected in ground water in a vertical interval from about 68 to 176 feet below sea level beneath the shoreline where the contaminant plume emanating from a capped landfill on the Massachusetts Military Reservation intersects Red Brook Harbor. JF - Water Resources Investigations Report. United States Geological Survey AU - Mccobb, T D AU - Leblanc Y1 - 2002///0, PY - 2002 DA - 0, 2002 PB - United States Geological Survey KW - Pollution Abstracts; Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts; Water Resources Abstracts KW - USGS-WRI-02-4166 KW - Sea level KW - Water Analysis KW - Landfills KW - Groundwater flow KW - Groundwater Pollution KW - Chemical oxygen demand KW - Pollutants KW - Waste disposal sites KW - USA, Massachusetts, Cape Cod KW - Groundwater pollution KW - ANW, USA, Massachusetts, Cape Cod KW - Trichloroethylene KW - Tetrachloroethylene KW - Harbors KW - Military KW - Groundwater KW - Contaminants KW - Plumes KW - Water Resources KW - M2 556:General (556) KW - P 2000:FRESHWATER POLLUTION KW - SW 3020:Sources and fate of pollution UR - http://libproxy.lib.unc.edu/login?url=http://search.proquest.com/docview/19925732?accountid=14244 L2 - http://vb3lk7eb4t.search.serialssolutions.com/?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&rfr_id=info:sid/Pollution+Abstracts&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=report&rft.jtitle=&rft.atitle=&rft.au=Mccobb%2C+T+D%3BLeblanc&rft.aulast=Mccobb&rft.aufirst=T&rft.date=2002-01-01&rft.volume=&rft.issue=&rft.spage=&rft.isbn=&rft.btitle=Detection+of+Fresh+Gound+Water+and+a+Contaminant+Plume+Beneath+Red+Brook+Harbor%2C+Cape+Cod%2C+Massachusetts.+2000&rft.title=Detection+of+Fresh+Gound+Water+and+a+Contaminant+Plume+Beneath+Red+Brook+Harbor%2C+Cape+Cod%2C+Massachusetts.+2000&rft.issn=&rft_id=info:doi/ LA - English DB - ProQuest Environmental Science Collection N1 - Date revised - 2006-12-01 N1 - SuppNotes - Order this product from NTIS by: phone at 1-800-553-NTIS (U.S. customers); (703)605-6000 (other countries); fax at (703)605-6900; e-mail: orders[at]ntis.gov. NTIS Prices: AV A04; This document is color dependent and/or in landscape layout. It is currently available on CD-ROM and paper only. Prepared in cooperation with Air Force Center for Environmental Excellence, Brooks AFB, TX. N1 - Last updated - 2016-12-21 ER - TY - RPRT T1 - Case Study of the Environmental Signature of a Recently Abandoned, Carbonate-Hosted Replacement Deposit: The Clayton Mine, Idaho AN - 19925378; 6261504 AB - The Clayton mine (Fig. 1) is a silver-lead-zinc replacement deposit in the Bayhorse mining district in Custer County, Idaho. The mine was last operated by Clayton Silver Mines, Inc. through 1986. The modern mill at the mine site is along Kinnikinic Creek, which drains into the Salmon River at Clayton, about 1.5 miles (2.4 km) downstream from the mine. The mill produced a lead concentrate by selective flotation that contained 35 to 45 percent lead and 3,400 to 6,800 g/t silver (Hillman, 1986). Mill tailings were placed as terraces along steep slopes within the narrow stream valley, extending to the edge of creek. Prior to the most recent mining activity, a historic smelter, on the north bank of the Salmon River at the town of Clayton, processed ores from a number of mines in the district and dumped slag directly into the river. The smelter operated intermittently from the 1880s to 1902 (Wells, 1983). The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and the U.S. Bureau of Land Management (BLM) have been investigating environmental issues related to the abandoned mine site since the early 1990s (EPA, 2000a). In October, 2001, EPA completed a Time- Critical Removal Action to stabilize mine tailings to prevent erosion into Kinnikinic Creek, to control infiltration of water into tailings and seepage of water from tailings, and to minimize wind erosion (EPA 1999, 2001). USGS sampled solids and waters at the site in August, 1999 and repeated water sampling in August, 2000. Data for solids, surface waters, and leachates from composite mine waste and mill tailings are reported here, along with descriptive information from the literature, in the form of a geoenvironmental model for the deposit. Sample locations from global positioning system instruments (GPS) and laboratory numbers keyed to the National Geochemical Database (U.S. Geological Survey, 1997) are listed in Appendix A. Analytical methods and detection limits are given in the Appendix B. JF - Open-file Report. U.S. Geological Survey AU - Hammarstron, J M AU - Eppinger, R G AU - Gosen, Van, BS AU - Briggs, PH AU - Meier, AL Y1 - 2002///0, PY - 2002 DA - 0, 2002 SP - 48 PB - United States Geological Survey KW - Pollution Abstracts; Water Resources Abstracts KW - USGS-OFR-02-10 KW - Water sampling KW - Water Pollution Sources KW - Surface water KW - geological surveys KW - Streams KW - Lead KW - Mining wastes KW - mine tailings KW - Salmonidae KW - Data Collections KW - Rivers KW - Environmental Engineering KW - valleys KW - Geochemistry KW - Smelters KW - Mines KW - case studies KW - EPA KW - USA KW - USA, Idaho KW - Erosion KW - Infiltration KW - salmon KW - Mine Wastes KW - Mining KW - Leachates KW - Silver KW - P 2000:FRESHWATER POLLUTION KW - SW 3020:Sources and fate of pollution UR - http://libproxy.lib.unc.edu/login?url=http://search.proquest.com/docview/19925378?accountid=14244 L2 - http://vb3lk7eb4t.search.serialssolutions.com/?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&rfr_id=info:sid/Pollution+Abstracts&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=report&rft.jtitle=&rft.atitle=&rft.au=Hammarstron%2C+J+M%3BEppinger%2C+R+G%3BGosen%2C+Van%2C+BS%3BBriggs%2C+PH%3BMeier%2C+AL&rft.aulast=Hammarstron&rft.aufirst=J&rft.date=2002-01-01&rft.volume=&rft.issue=&rft.spage=48&rft.isbn=&rft.btitle=Case+Study+of+the+Environmental+Signature+of+a+Recently+Abandoned%2C+Carbonate-Hosted+Replacement+Deposit%3A+The+Clayton+Mine%2C+Idaho&rft.title=Case+Study+of+the+Environmental+Signature+of+a+Recently+Abandoned%2C+Carbonate-Hosted+Replacement+Deposit%3A+The+Clayton+Mine%2C+Idaho&rft.issn=&rft_id=info:doi/ LA - English DB - ProQuest Environmental Science Collection N1 - Date revised - 2006-12-01 N1 - SuppNotes - Order this product from NTIS by: Phone at 1-800-553-NTIS (U.S. Customers); (703)605-6000 (Other countries); fax at (703)605-6900; email: orders[at]ntis.gov N1 - Last updated - 2016-12-21 ER - TY - RPRT T1 - Water Quality of the Flint River Basin, Alabama and Tennessee, 1999-2000 AN - 19924816; 6261775 AB - The U.S. Geological Survey monitored eight stream sites in the Flint River Basin during the period January 1999 through May 2000, to characterize patterns in the occurrence of pesticides, fecal- indicator bacteria, and nutrients in relation to season and streamflow conditions and to land-use patterns. This study is part of the National Water-Quality Assessment Program, which was designed to assess water quality as it relates to various land uses. Every water sample collected from the Flint River Basin had detectable levels of at least two pesticides; 64 percent of the samples contained mixtures of at least five pesticides. In general, pesticides detected most frequently and at highest concentrations in streams corresponded to the pesticides with the highest rates of use in the watersheds. Detections of fluometuron, nonflurazon, and atrazine were more frequent (by a margin of 15 percent or more) in samples from the Flint River when compared with the frequencies of pesticide detections at 62 agricultural stream sites across the Nation. JF - Water Resources Investigations Report. United States Geological Survey AU - Hoos, AB AU - Garrett, J W AU - Knight, R R Y1 - 2002///0, PY - 2002 DA - 0, 2002 SP - 52 PB - United States Geological Survey KW - Pollution Abstracts; ASFA 3: Aquatic Pollution & Environmental Quality; Water Resources Abstracts KW - USGS-WRI-01-4185 KW - Land Use KW - water quality KW - Pollution monitoring KW - River Basins KW - Agricultural Runoff KW - Resource management KW - Water sampling KW - Water Pollution Sources KW - Agricultural pollution KW - geological surveys KW - Nutrients KW - Freshwater KW - Water quality KW - Watersheds KW - Streams KW - Water analysis KW - Flow rates KW - USA, Alabama KW - USA, Flint R. basin KW - Agricultural runoff KW - Rivers KW - Water Quality KW - Streamflow KW - Herbicides KW - River basins KW - Land use KW - USA, Georgia, Flint R. KW - nutrients KW - USA, Tennessee KW - Atrazine KW - Pesticides KW - P 2000:FRESHWATER POLLUTION KW - SW 3020:Sources and fate of pollution KW - Q5 08502:Methods and instruments UR - http://libproxy.lib.unc.edu/login?url=http://search.proquest.com/docview/19924816?accountid=14244 L2 - http://vb3lk7eb4t.search.serialssolutions.com/?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&rfr_id=info:sid/Aquatic+Science+%26+Fisheries+Abstracts+%28ASFA%29+3%3A+Aquatic+Pollution+%26+Environmental+Quality&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=report&rft.jtitle=&rft.atitle=&rft.au=Hoos%2C+AB%3BGarrett%2C+J+W%3BKnight%2C+R+R&rft.aulast=Hoos&rft.aufirst=AB&rft.date=2002-01-01&rft.volume=&rft.issue=&rft.spage=52&rft.isbn=&rft.btitle=Water+Quality+of+the+Flint+River+Basin%2C+Alabama+and+Tennessee%2C+1999-2000&rft.title=Water+Quality+of+the+Flint+River+Basin%2C+Alabama+and+Tennessee%2C+1999-2000&rft.issn=&rft_id=info:doi/ LA - English DB - ProQuest Environmental Science Collection N1 - Date revised - 2005-08-01 N1 - SuppNotes - Available on CD-ROM and in paper copy. Product reproduced from digital image. Order this product from NTIS by: phone at 1-800-553- NTIS (U.S. customers); (703)605-6000 (other countries); fax at (703)605-6900; e-mail: orders[at]ntis.gov. NTIS Prices: PC A05; This document is color dependent and/or in landscape layout. It is currently only available on CD-ROM. N1 - Last updated - 2016-12-21 ER - TY - RPRT T1 - Diazinon and Chlorpyrifos Loads in the San Joaquin River Basin, California, January and February 2000 AN - 19924766; 6261760 AB - The purpose of this report is to describe the loads of diazinon and chlorpyrifos in the San Joaquin Basin during January and February 2000. Loads, storm and nonstorm related, are compared with applications and storm runoff. 1994. A total of 13 sites were sampled weekly during nonstorm periods and more frequently during two storm periods. The sites included five major river and eight minor tributary sites. JF - Water Resources Investigations Report. United States Geological Survey AU - Kratzer, C R AU - Zamora, C AU - Knifong, D L Y1 - 2002///0, PY - 2002 DA - 0, 2002 PB - United States Geological Survey KW - Pollution Abstracts; ASFA 3: Aquatic Pollution & Environmental Quality; Water Resources Abstracts KW - USGS-WRI-02-4103 KW - Agricultural Runoff KW - River Basins KW - USA, California, San Joaquin Basin KW - Storm Runoff KW - Water Pollution Sources KW - Basins KW - Freshwater KW - Storms KW - Agricultural Chemicals KW - Stormwater runoff KW - USA, California KW - Agricultural runoff KW - Nonpoint Pollution Sources KW - Pollution Load KW - River basins KW - Water pollution KW - Chlorpyrifos KW - USA, California, San Joaquin R. basin KW - Pesticides KW - Diazinon KW - Q5 08503:Characteristics, behavior and fate KW - P 2000:FRESHWATER POLLUTION KW - SW 3020:Sources and fate of pollution UR - http://libproxy.lib.unc.edu/login?url=http://search.proquest.com/docview/19924766?accountid=14244 L2 - http://vb3lk7eb4t.search.serialssolutions.com/?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&rfr_id=info:sid/Aquatic+Science+%26+Fisheries+Abstracts+%28ASFA%29+3%3A+Aquatic+Pollution+%26+Environmental+Quality&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=report&rft.jtitle=&rft.atitle=&rft.au=Kratzer%2C+C+R%3BZamora%2C+C%3BKnifong%2C+D+L&rft.aulast=Kratzer&rft.aufirst=C&rft.date=2002-01-01&rft.volume=&rft.issue=&rft.spage=&rft.isbn=&rft.btitle=Diazinon+and+Chlorpyrifos+Loads+in+the+San+Joaquin+River+Basin%2C+California%2C+January+and+February+2000&rft.title=Diazinon+and+Chlorpyrifos+Loads+in+the+San+Joaquin+River+Basin%2C+California%2C+January+and+February+2000&rft.issn=&rft_id=info:doi/ LA - English DB - ProQuest Environmental Science Collection N1 - Date revised - 2005-08-01 N1 - SuppNotes - Order this product from NTIS by: phone at 1-800-553-NTIS (U.S. customers); (703)605-6000 (other countries); fax at (703)605-6900; e-mail: orders[at]ntis.gov. NTIS Prices: AV A04; This document is color dependent and/or in landscape layout. It is currently only available on CD-ROM. Prepared in cooperation with California Dept. of Pesticide Regulation, Sacramento. and California State Univ. Foundation, Sacramento. N1 - Last updated - 2016-12-21 ER - TY - RPRT T1 - Streamflow, Water Quality, and Quantification of Metal Loading in the Upper Tenmile Creek Watershed, Lewis and Clark County, West- Central Montana, September 1998 AN - 19924696; 6261721 AB - The purpose of this report is to present the results of a metal-loading study conducted on two reaches of the upper Tenmile Creek watershed during September 1998. These results describe the streamflow and quality of water in Tenmile Creek, quantify metal loads entering Tenmile Creek, and identify the predominant source areas contributing these metals. Along with the metal-loading results, this report also presents supplemental synoptic streamflow measurements that were made to determine if flow is lost from the channel along the lower reach of Tenmile Creek. JF - Water Resources Investigations Report. United States Geological Survey AU - Cleasby, TE AU - Nimick, DA Y1 - 2002///0, PY - 2002 DA - 0, 2002 SP - 74 PB - United States Geological Survey KW - Pollution Abstracts; ASFA 3: Aquatic Pollution & Environmental Quality; Water Resources Abstracts; ASFA 2: Ocean Technology Policy & Non-Living Resources KW - USGS-WRI-02-4072 KW - Water Pollution KW - water quality KW - Water Pollution Sources KW - Heavy metals KW - Water resources KW - Freshwater KW - Watersheds KW - Water quality KW - Streams KW - Flow rates KW - USA, Montana, Tenmile Creek KW - USA, Florida, Tenmile Creek KW - USA, Montana KW - Rivers KW - Metals KW - Water Quality KW - River discharge KW - Streamflow KW - Heavy Metals KW - Water pollution KW - Stream flow KW - Channels KW - Trace metals KW - Water Resources KW - Q5 08503:Characteristics, behavior and fate KW - P 2000:FRESHWATER POLLUTION KW - SW 3020:Sources and fate of pollution KW - Q2 09171:Dynamics of lakes and rivers UR - http://libproxy.lib.unc.edu/login?url=http://search.proquest.com/docview/19924696?accountid=14244 L2 - http://vb3lk7eb4t.search.serialssolutions.com/?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&rfr_id=info:sid/Aquatic+Science+%26+Fisheries+Abstracts+%28ASFA%29+3%3A+Aquatic+Pollution+%26+Environmental+Quality&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=report&rft.jtitle=&rft.atitle=&rft.au=Cleasby%2C+TE%3BNimick%2C+DA&rft.aulast=Cleasby&rft.aufirst=TE&rft.date=2002-01-01&rft.volume=&rft.issue=&rft.spage=74&rft.isbn=&rft.btitle=Streamflow%2C+Water+Quality%2C+and+Quantification+of+Metal+Loading+in+the+Upper+Tenmile+Creek+Watershed%2C+Lewis+and+Clark+County%2C+West-+Central+Montana%2C+September+1998&rft.title=Streamflow%2C+Water+Quality%2C+and+Quantification+of+Metal+Loading+in+the+Upper+Tenmile+Creek+Watershed%2C+Lewis+and+Clark+County%2C+West-+Central+Montana%2C+September+1998&rft.issn=&rft_id=info:doi/ LA - English DB - ProQuest Environmental Science Collection N1 - Date revised - 2006-08-01 N1 - SuppNotes - Product reproduced from digital image. Order this product from NTIS by: phone at 1-800-553-NTIS (U.S. customers); (703)605-6000 (other countries); fax at (703)605-6900; e-mail: orders[at]ntis.gov. NTIS Prices: PC A05/MF A01; See also PB2001-106238. Prepared in cooperation with Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. N1 - Last updated - 2016-12-21 ER - TY - RPRT T1 - Evaluation of Trends in pH in the Yampa River, Northwestern Colorado, 1950-2000 AN - 19923956; 6261836 AB - In 1999, the U.S. Geological Survey began a study of pH trends in the Yampa River from near its headwaters to its mouth. The study was prompted by an apparent historical increase in measured pH at the Yampa River near Maybell, from an average of about 7.6 in the 1950's and 1960's to about 8.3 in the 1980's and 1990's. if real, further increase could cause more frequent exceedances of the Colorado water-quality standard of 9.0 and adversely affect aquatic life in the Yampa River Basin, including Dinosaur National Monument. The principal conclusion of this study is that this apparent historical increase in measured pH was caused mostly by changes in measurement protocol. JF - Water Resources Investigations Report. United States Geological Survey AU - Chafin, D T Y1 - 2002///0, PY - 2002 DA - 0, 2002 SP - 50 PB - United States Geological Survey KW - Pollution Abstracts; ASFA 3: Aquatic Pollution & Environmental Quality; Water Resources Abstracts KW - USGS-WRI-02-4038 KW - Water Pollution KW - Historical account KW - Aquatic organisms KW - River Basins KW - geological surveys KW - USA, Colorado, Yampa R. KW - Freshwater KW - Ecological Effects KW - Water quality KW - Water analysis KW - Water Quality Standards KW - national monuments KW - dinosaurs KW - Pollution data KW - pH KW - Rivers KW - Aquatic Life KW - Hydrogen Ion Concentration KW - River basins KW - Water quality standards KW - USA, Colorado KW - Water Resources KW - P 2000:FRESHWATER POLLUTION KW - SW 3020:Sources and fate of pollution KW - Q5 08521:Mechanical and natural changes UR - http://libproxy.lib.unc.edu/login?url=http://search.proquest.com/docview/19923956?accountid=14244 L2 - http://vb3lk7eb4t.search.serialssolutions.com/?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&rfr_id=info:sid/Aquatic+Science+%26+Fisheries+Abstracts+%28ASFA%29+3%3A+Aquatic+Pollution+%26+Environmental+Quality&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=report&rft.jtitle=&rft.atitle=&rft.au=Chafin%2C+D+T&rft.aulast=Chafin&rft.aufirst=D&rft.date=2002-01-01&rft.volume=&rft.issue=&rft.spage=50&rft.isbn=&rft.btitle=Evaluation+of+Trends+in+pH+in+the+Yampa+River%2C+Northwestern+Colorado%2C+1950-2000&rft.title=Evaluation+of+Trends+in+pH+in+the+Yampa+River%2C+Northwestern+Colorado%2C+1950-2000&rft.issn=&rft_id=info:doi/ LA - English DB - ProQuest Environmental Science Collection N1 - Date revised - 2005-08-01 N1 - SuppNotes - Order this product from NTIS by: phone at 1-800-553-NTIS (U.S. customers); (703)605-6000 (other countries); fax at (703)605-6900; e-mail: orders[at]ntis.gov. NTIS Prices: PC A04/MF A01 N1 - Last updated - 2016-12-21 ER - TY - RPRT T1 - Priority-Pollutant Trace Elements in Streambed Sediments of the Cook Inlet Basin, Alaska, 1998-2000 AN - 19923052; 6261801 AB - This report describes the analysis of priority-pollutant trace element concentrations in streambed sediment samples collected in the Cook Inlet Basin during 1998 and 2000. JF - Water Resources Investigations Report. United States Geological Survey AU - Frenzel, SA Y1 - 2002///0, PY - 2002 DA - 0, 2002 PB - United States Geological Survey KW - Pollution Abstracts; ASFA 3: Aquatic Pollution & Environmental Quality; Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts; ASFA 2: Ocean Technology Policy & Non-Living Resources; Water Resources Abstracts KW - USGS-WRI-02-4163 KW - Water Pollution KW - Pollution monitoring KW - Water sampling and analysis KW - Report literature KW - Basins KW - Water resources KW - Streams KW - Trace elements KW - Sediment Contamination KW - Coastal inlets KW - USA, Alaska KW - Rivers KW - Sediment pollution KW - Streambeds KW - Water Quality KW - Trace Elements KW - Sediments KW - INE, USA, Alaska, Cook Inlet KW - River sediment pollution KW - USA, Alaska, Cook Inlet KW - Trace elements in river water KW - Water Resources KW - M2 556.53:Rivers, Streams, Canals (556.53) KW - P 2000:FRESHWATER POLLUTION KW - SW 3020:Sources and fate of pollution KW - Q2 09187:Geochemistry of sediments KW - Q5 08502:Methods and instruments UR - http://libproxy.lib.unc.edu/login?url=http://search.proquest.com/docview/19923052?accountid=14244 L2 - http://vb3lk7eb4t.search.serialssolutions.com/?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&rfr_id=info:sid/Aquatic+Science+%26+Fisheries+Abstracts+%28ASFA%29+3%3A+Aquatic+Pollution+%26+Environmental+Quality&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=report&rft.jtitle=&rft.atitle=&rft.au=Frenzel%2C+SA&rft.aulast=Frenzel&rft.aufirst=SA&rft.date=2002-01-01&rft.volume=&rft.issue=&rft.spage=&rft.isbn=&rft.btitle=Priority-Pollutant+Trace+Elements+in+Streambed+Sediments+of+the+Cook+Inlet+Basin%2C+Alaska%2C+1998-2000&rft.title=Priority-Pollutant+Trace+Elements+in+Streambed+Sediments+of+the+Cook+Inlet+Basin%2C+Alaska%2C+1998-2000&rft.issn=&rft_id=info:doi/ LA - English DB - ProQuest Environmental Science Collection N1 - Date revised - 2006-09-01 N1 - SuppNotes - Order this product from NTIS by: phone at 1-800-553-NTIS (U.S. customers); (703)605-6000 (other countries); fax at (703)605-6900; e-mail: orders[at]ntis.gov. NTIS Prices: AV A03; This document is color dependent and/or in landscape layout. It is currently only available on CD-ROM. N1 - Last updated - 2016-12-21 ER - TY - RPRT T1 - Natural Attenuation of Chlorinated Volatile Organic Compounds in Ground Water at Operable Unit 1, Naval Undersea Warfare Center, Division Keyport, Washington AN - 19922991; 6261752 AB - The U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) evaluated the natural attenuation of chlorinated volatile organic compounds (CVOCs) in ground water beneath the former landfill at Operable Unit 1 (OU 1), Naval Undersea Warfare Center, Division Keyport, Washington. The predominant contaminants in ground water are trichloroethene (TCE) and its degradation byproducts cis-1,2- dichloroethene (cisDCE) and vinyl chloride (VC). The Navy planted two hybrid poplar plantations on the landfill in spring of 1999 to remove and control the migration of CVOCs in shallow ground water. Previous studies provided evidence that microbial degradation processes also reduce CVOC concentrations in ground water at OU 1, so monitored natural attenuation is a potential alternative remedy if phytoremediation is ineffective. This report describes the current (2000) understanding of natural attenuation of CVOCs in ground water at OU 1 and the impacts that phytoremediation activities to date have had on attenuation processes. The evaluation is based on ground-water and surface-water chemistry data and hydrogeologic data collected at the site by the USGS and Navy contractors between 1991 and 2000. JF - Water Resources Investigations Report. United States Geological Survey AU - Dinicola, R S AU - Cox, SE AU - Landmeyer, JE AU - Bradley, P M Y1 - 2002///0, PY - 2002 DA - 0, 2002 PB - United States Geological Survey KW - Pollution Abstracts; Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts; Water Resources Abstracts KW - USGS-WRI-02-4119 KW - Groundwater hydrology KW - Degradation KW - Surface water KW - Landfills KW - geological surveys KW - Byproducts KW - Organic compounds in water KW - Groundwater Pollution KW - Migration KW - plantations KW - USA, Washington KW - Phytoremediation KW - Waste disposal sites KW - natural attenuation KW - Trichloroethylene KW - Vinyl chloride KW - migration KW - Water Pollution Treatment KW - Volatile organic compounds in groundwater KW - hybrids KW - Remediation KW - Geohydrology KW - Groundwater pollution KW - Organic Compounds KW - Groundwater KW - Volatile organic compounds KW - P 2000:FRESHWATER POLLUTION KW - SW 3070:Water quality control KW - M2 556.3:Groundwater Hydrology (556.3) UR - http://libproxy.lib.unc.edu/login?url=http://search.proquest.com/docview/19922991?accountid=14244 L2 - http://vb3lk7eb4t.search.serialssolutions.com/?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&rfr_id=info:sid/Pollution+Abstracts&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=report&rft.jtitle=&rft.atitle=&rft.au=Dinicola%2C+R+S%3BCox%2C+SE%3BLandmeyer%2C+JE%3BBradley%2C+P+M&rft.aulast=Dinicola&rft.aufirst=R&rft.date=2002-01-01&rft.volume=&rft.issue=&rft.spage=&rft.isbn=&rft.btitle=Natural+Attenuation+of+Chlorinated+Volatile+Organic+Compounds+in+Ground+Water+at+Operable+Unit+1%2C+Naval+Undersea+Warfare+Center%2C+Division+Keyport%2C+Washington&rft.title=Natural+Attenuation+of+Chlorinated+Volatile+Organic+Compounds+in+Ground+Water+at+Operable+Unit+1%2C+Naval+Undersea+Warfare+Center%2C+Division+Keyport%2C+Washington&rft.issn=&rft_id=info:doi/ LA - English DB - ProQuest Environmental Science Collection N1 - Date revised - 2006-12-01 N1 - SuppNotes - Order this product from NTIS by: phone at 1-800-553-NTIS (U.S. customers); (703)605-6000 (other countries); fax at (703)605-6900; e-mail: orders[at]ntis.gov. NTIS Prices: AV A08; This document is color dependent and/or in landscape layout. It is currently only available on CD-ROM. N1 - Last updated - 2016-12-21 ER - TY - RPRT T1 - Environmental Setting and Water-Quality Issues of the Mobile River Basin, Alabama, Georgia, Mississippi, and Tennessee AN - 19920479; 6261887 AB - This report describe the natural and cultural factors that are believed to control or have a large-scale or regional influence on the current water quality of the Mobile River Basin. This information defines the environmental setting, which will be evaluated as the first step in designing and conducting a multidisciplinary water-quality assessment of the basin. Historical and recent information collected from Federal, State, Local agencies are used as baseline information in the report. JF - Water Resources Investigations Report. United States Geological Survey AU - Johnson, G C AU - Kidd, R E AU - Journey, CA AU - Zappia, H AU - Atkins, J B Y1 - 2002///0, PY - 2002 DA - 0, 2002 PB - United States Geological Survey KW - Pollution Abstracts; ASFA 3: Aquatic Pollution & Environmental Quality; Water Resources Abstracts KW - USGS-WRI-02-4162 KW - Water Pollution KW - Historical account KW - water quality KW - River Basins KW - USA, Georgia, Mobile R. basin KW - Basins KW - Water resources KW - Freshwater KW - Water quality KW - Assessments KW - USA, Alabama, Mobile R. basin KW - USA, Tennessee, Mobile R. basin KW - Environmental surveys KW - Water Quality KW - Surveys KW - River basins KW - Pollution surveys KW - USA, Tennessee KW - USA, Alabama, Mobile R. KW - USA, Mississippi KW - USA, Mississippi, Mobile R. basin KW - culture KW - Water Resources KW - P 2000:FRESHWATER POLLUTION KW - SW 3020:Sources and fate of pollution KW - Q5 08502:Methods and instruments UR - http://libproxy.lib.unc.edu/login?url=http://search.proquest.com/docview/19920479?accountid=14244 L2 - http://vb3lk7eb4t.search.serialssolutions.com/?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&rfr_id=info:sid/Aquatic+Science+%26+Fisheries+Abstracts+%28ASFA%29+3%3A+Aquatic+Pollution+%26+Environmental+Quality&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=report&rft.jtitle=&rft.atitle=&rft.au=Johnson%2C+G+C%3BKidd%2C+R+E%3BJourney%2C+CA%3BZappia%2C+H%3BAtkins%2C+J+B&rft.aulast=Johnson&rft.aufirst=G&rft.date=2002-01-01&rft.volume=&rft.issue=&rft.spage=&rft.isbn=&rft.btitle=Environmental+Setting+and+Water-Quality+Issues+of+the+Mobile+River+Basin%2C+Alabama%2C+Georgia%2C+Mississippi%2C+and+Tennessee&rft.title=Environmental+Setting+and+Water-Quality+Issues+of+the+Mobile+River+Basin%2C+Alabama%2C+Georgia%2C+Mississippi%2C+and+Tennessee&rft.issn=&rft_id=info:doi/ LA - English DB - ProQuest Environmental Science Collection N1 - Date revised - 2005-08-01 N1 - SuppNotes - Order this product from NTIS by: phone at 1-800-553-NTIS (U.S. customers); (703)605-6000 (other countries); fax at (703)605-6900; e-mail: orders[at]ntis.gov. NTIS Prices: AV A05; This document is color dependent and/or in landscape layout. It is currently available on CD-ROM and paper only. N1 - Last updated - 2016-12-21 ER - TY - RPRT T1 - Ground-Water Quality in the Central High Plains Aquifer, Colorado, Kansas, New Mexico, Oklahoma, and Texas, 1999 AN - 19919537; 6261805 AB - The purpose of this report is to describe the ground-water quality of the central High Plains aquifer in parts of Colorado, Kansas, New Mexico, Oklahoma, and Texas. Water samples collected during April- August 1999 from 74 randomly distributed domestic water-supply wells in the central High Plains aquifer were analyzed to evaluate ground-water quality. Water samples from each well were analyzed for 186 constituents including: water properties, major ions, nutrients, dissolved organic carbon, trace elements, radon, volatile organic compounds, pesticides, and tritium. Many of these constituents are regulated in public drinking-water supplies by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) under the Safe Water Drinking Act. The study area extended from about Goodland, Kansas, south to Amarillo, Texas JF - Water Resources Investigations Report. United States Geological Survey AU - Becker, M F AU - Bruce, B W AU - Pope, L M AU - Andrews, W J Y1 - 2002///0, PY - 2002 DA - 0, 2002 PB - United States Geological Survey KW - Pollution Abstracts; Water Resources Abstracts KW - USGS-WRI-02-4112 KW - Aquifers KW - USA, Texas, Amarillo KW - Water sampling KW - Water Analysis KW - Water Sampling KW - Water Supply KW - Groundwater Pollution KW - USA, Wyoming, High Plains KW - Domestic Water KW - Trace elements KW - USA, Oklahoma KW - plains KW - Dissolved organic carbon KW - Ions KW - USA, New Mexico KW - USA, Wyoming KW - Well Data KW - Water Quality KW - Trace Elements KW - USA, Kansas KW - Radon KW - nutrients KW - EPA KW - USA, Colorado KW - Tritium KW - Pesticides KW - Water wells KW - USA, Texas KW - Organic Compounds KW - Drinking water KW - Groundwater KW - Volatile organic compounds KW - P 2000:FRESHWATER POLLUTION KW - SW 3020:Sources and fate of pollution UR - http://libproxy.lib.unc.edu/login?url=http://search.proquest.com/docview/19919537?accountid=14244 L2 - http://vb3lk7eb4t.search.serialssolutions.com/?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&rfr_id=info:sid/Pollution+Abstracts&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=report&rft.jtitle=&rft.atitle=&rft.au=Becker%2C+M+F%3BBruce%2C+B+W%3BPope%2C+L+M%3BAndrews%2C+W+J&rft.aulast=Becker&rft.aufirst=M&rft.date=2002-01-01&rft.volume=&rft.issue=&rft.spage=&rft.isbn=&rft.btitle=Ground-Water+Quality+in+the+Central+High+Plains+Aquifer%2C+Colorado%2C+Kansas%2C+New+Mexico%2C+Oklahoma%2C+and+Texas%2C+1999&rft.title=Ground-Water+Quality+in+the+Central+High+Plains+Aquifer%2C+Colorado%2C+Kansas%2C+New+Mexico%2C+Oklahoma%2C+and+Texas%2C+1999&rft.issn=&rft_id=info:doi/ LA - English DB - ProQuest Environmental Science Collection N1 - Date revised - 2006-12-01 N1 - SuppNotes - Order this product from NTIS by: phone at 1-800-553-NTIS (U.S. customers); (703)605-6000 (other countries); fax at (703)605-6900; e-mail: orders[at]ntis.gov. NTIS Prices: AV A05; Notes This document is color dependent and/or in landscape layout. It is currently only available on CD-ROM. N1 - Last updated - 2016-12-21 ER - TY - RPRT T1 - Estimation of Nitrogen Yields and Loads from Basins Draining to Long Island Sound, 1988-98 AN - 19919487; 6261793 AB - Monitoring data on total nitrogen concentrations and streamflow were used to estimate annual nonpoint nitrogen loads for 1988-98 at 28 monitoring sites and 26 unmonitored basins that drain to Long Island Sound. The estimated total nitrogen yields at monitoring sites were used with basin characteristics and ancillary data to develop a multiple-linear regression equation to estimate nonpoint nitrogen yields from monitored and unmonitored basins. The estimated nonpoint nitrogen load to Long Island Sound from the basins studied ranged from 21 million pounds in water year 1995 to 50 million pounds in water year 1990. JF - Water Resources Investigations Report. United States Geological Survey AU - Mullaney, J R AU - Schwarz, GE AU - Todd Trench, EC Y1 - 2002///0, PY - 2002 DA - 0, 2002 PB - United States Geological Survey KW - Pollution Abstracts; ASFA 3: Aquatic Pollution & Environmental Quality; Water Resources Abstracts KW - USGS-WRI-02-4044 KW - Water Pollution KW - Pollution monitoring KW - Basins KW - Water resources KW - Freshwater KW - Water quality KW - Watersheds KW - Flow rates KW - Yield KW - Hydrologic Data KW - Mathematical models KW - ANW, USA, Long Island Sound KW - Nonpoint Pollution Sources KW - Pollution Load KW - Fate KW - Water pollution KW - Stream flow KW - Monitoring KW - Stream Discharge KW - Nitrogen KW - Q5 08503:Characteristics, behavior and fate KW - P 2000:FRESHWATER POLLUTION KW - SW 3020:Sources and fate of pollution UR - http://libproxy.lib.unc.edu/login?url=http://search.proquest.com/docview/19919487?accountid=14244 L2 - http://vb3lk7eb4t.search.serialssolutions.com/?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&rfr_id=info:sid/Aquatic+Science+%26+Fisheries+Abstracts+%28ASFA%29+3%3A+Aquatic+Pollution+%26+Environmental+Quality&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=report&rft.jtitle=&rft.atitle=&rft.au=Mullaney%2C+J+R%3BSchwarz%2C+GE%3BTodd+Trench%2C+EC&rft.aulast=Mullaney&rft.aufirst=J&rft.date=2002-01-01&rft.volume=&rft.issue=&rft.spage=&rft.isbn=&rft.btitle=Estimation+of+Nitrogen+Yields+and+Loads+from+Basins+Draining+to+Long+Island+Sound%2C+1988-98&rft.title=Estimation+of+Nitrogen+Yields+and+Loads+from+Basins+Draining+to+Long+Island+Sound%2C+1988-98&rft.issn=&rft_id=info:doi/ LA - English DB - ProQuest Environmental Science Collection N1 - Date revised - 2006-08-01 N1 - SuppNotes - Order this product from NTIS by: phone at 1-800-553-NTIS (U.S. customers); (703)605-6000 (other countries); fax at (703)605-6900; e-mail: orders[at]ntis.gov. NTIS Prices: AV A06; This document is color dependent and/or in landscape layout. It is currently only available on CD-ROM. N1 - Last updated - 2016-12-21 ER - TY - RPRT T1 - Microbiological Quality of Water from Noncommunity Supply Wells in Carbonate and Crystalline Aquifers of Pennsylvania AN - 19919426; 6261742 AB - Contents include: Abstract; Introduction; Sampling design; Methods of study; Microbiological quality of ground water used for noncommunity water supply; Summary and conclusions; References cited; Appendix 1: Noncommunity supply well information for Pennsylvania; Appendix 2: Water-quality data for noncommunity supply wells in Pennsylvania; Illustrations; Tables and Conversion factors and Abbreviations. JF - Water Resources Investigations Report. United States Geological Survey AU - Lindsey, B D AU - Rasberry, J S AU - Zimmerman, T M Y1 - 2002///0, PY - 2002 DA - 0, 2002 SP - 40 PB - United States Geological Survey KW - Pollution Abstracts; Microbiology Abstracts A: Industrial & Applied Microbiology; Water Resources Abstracts KW - USGS-WRI-01-4268 KW - Aquifers KW - Water Pollution KW - water quality KW - Water Supply KW - Water resources KW - Freshwater KW - Water supplies KW - Microbiological Studies KW - Ground water KW - Sampling KW - Data processing KW - Carbonates KW - Water Quality KW - Appendix KW - Wells KW - USA, Pennsylvania KW - Water wells KW - Groundwater KW - carbonates KW - Water Resources KW - P 2000:FRESHWATER POLLUTION KW - A 01450:Environmental Pollution & Waste Treatment KW - SW 3010:Identification of pollutants UR - http://libproxy.lib.unc.edu/login?url=http://search.proquest.com/docview/19919426?accountid=14244 L2 - http://vb3lk7eb4t.search.serialssolutions.com/?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&rfr_id=info:sid/Industrial+and+Applied+Microbiology+Abstracts+%28Microbiology+A%29&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=report&rft.jtitle=&rft.atitle=&rft.au=Lindsey%2C+B+D%3BRasberry%2C+J+S%3BZimmerman%2C+T+M&rft.aulast=Lindsey&rft.aufirst=B&rft.date=2002-01-01&rft.volume=&rft.issue=&rft.spage=40&rft.isbn=&rft.btitle=Microbiological+Quality+of+Water+from+Noncommunity+Supply+Wells+in+Carbonate+and+Crystalline+Aquifers+of+Pennsylvania&rft.title=Microbiological+Quality+of+Water+from+Noncommunity+Supply+Wells+in+Carbonate+and+Crystalline+Aquifers+of+Pennsylvania&rft.issn=&rft_id=info:doi/ LA - English DB - ProQuest Environmental Science Collection N1 - Date revised - 2006-08-01 N1 - SuppNotes - Product reproduced from digital image. Order this product from NTIS by: phone at 1-800-553-NTIS (U.S. customers); (703)605-6000 (other countries); fax at (703)605-6900; e-mail: orders[at]ntis.gov. NTIS Prices: PC A04/MF A01; Prepared in cooperation with Pennsylvania Dept. of Environmental Protection, Harrisburg. N1 - Last updated - 2016-12-21 ER - TY - RPRT T1 - Pesticides Detected in Urban Streams during Rainstorms in King and Snohomish Counties, Washington, 1998 AN - 19919380; 6261731 AB - The U.S. Geological Survey and the Washington State Department of Ecology cooperated in sampling 13 sites in 10 urban watersheds during 3 storms in King County, Wash., in the spring of 1998. Twenty-six of the 98 pesticides and transformation products sampled for were detected. Twenty-three of the 26 were pesticides (17 herbicides, 5 insecticides, and 1 fungicides), and 3 were transformation products. The pesticides dichlobenil, 2,4-D, MCPP, Diazinon, and pentachlorophenol were detected at all of the urban study sites. JF - Water Resources Investigations Report. United States Geological Survey AU - Embrey, S S AU - Voss, F D Y1 - 2002///0, PY - 2002 DA - 0, 2002 SP - 38 PB - United States Geological Survey KW - Sustainability Science Abstracts; ASFA 3: Aquatic Pollution & Environmental Quality; Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts; Water Resources Abstracts; Human Population KW - USGS-WRI-00-4098 KW - 2,4-D KW - Urban Watersheds KW - Storm Runoff KW - Water Pollution Sources KW - Rainfall-runoff relationships KW - Water resources KW - Freshwater KW - Watersheds KW - Streams KW - Human impact KW - Ecology KW - USA, Washington KW - Insecticides KW - Stream Pollution KW - Sampling KW - Urban environments KW - Freshwater pollution KW - Rivers KW - USA, Washington, Snohomish Cty. KW - Herbicides KW - Rainstorms KW - Storm water KW - Geological surveys KW - Pesticides KW - Fungicides KW - Pesticides in river water KW - Diazinon KW - Urban environment KW - Q5 08503:Characteristics, behavior and fate KW - M2 556.53:Rivers, Streams, Canals (556.53) KW - M3 1010:Issues in Sustainable Development KW - M1 125:Population Health-Environment Relations KW - SW 3020:Sources and fate of pollution UR - http://libproxy.lib.unc.edu/login?url=http://search.proquest.com/docview/19919380?accountid=14244 L2 - http://vb3lk7eb4t.search.serialssolutions.com/?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&rfr_id=info:sid/Aquatic+Science+%26+Fisheries+Abstracts+%28ASFA%29+3%3A+Aquatic+Pollution+%26+Environmental+Quality&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=report&rft.jtitle=&rft.atitle=&rft.au=Embrey%2C+S+S%3BVoss%2C+F+D&rft.aulast=Embrey&rft.aufirst=S&rft.date=2002-01-01&rft.volume=&rft.issue=&rft.spage=38&rft.isbn=&rft.btitle=Pesticides+Detected+in+Urban+Streams+during+Rainstorms+in+King+and+Snohomish+Counties%2C+Washington%2C+1998&rft.title=Pesticides+Detected+in+Urban+Streams+during+Rainstorms+in+King+and+Snohomish+Counties%2C+Washington%2C+1998&rft.issn=&rft_id=info:doi/ LA - English DB - ProQuest Environmental Science Collection N1 - Date revised - 2006-07-01 N1 - SuppNotes - Product reproduced from digital image. Order this product from NTIS by: phone at 1-800-553-NTIS (U.S. customers); (703)605-6000 (other countries); fax at (703)605-6900; e-mail: orders[at]ntis.gov. NTIS Prices: PC A04/MF A01; Prepared in cooperation with Washington State Dept. of Ecology, Olympia. N1 - Last updated - 2016-12-21 ER - TY - RPRT T1 - Ground-Water Levels and Water-Quality Data from Monitoring Wells in Windham, Maine Water Years 1997-2001 AN - 19918970; 6261505 AB - Ongoing data collection in an established well network in Windham, Maine, serves as an indicator of the hydrologic and water- quality conditions in the aquifer. This report presents data collected from 1997 through 2001, including ground-water levels, measurements of water-quality field parameters, and concentrations of nutrients and arsenic. JF - Open-file Report. U.S. Geological Survey AU - Caldwell, J M Y1 - 2002///0, PY - 2002 DA - 0, 2002 SP - 28 PB - United States Geological Survey KW - Aquifers KW - Water wells KW - Pollution Abstracts; ASFA 3: Aquatic Pollution & Environmental Quality; Sustainability Science Abstracts; Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts; Water Resources Abstracts KW - USGS-OFR-02-145 KW - water quality KW - Pollution monitoring KW - USA, Maine, Windham KW - Groundwater Pollution KW - Nutrients KW - Freshwater KW - Groundwater levels KW - Water levels KW - Long-term records KW - Networks KW - Chemical pollution KW - Data Collections KW - Data collection KW - Arsenic KW - Data collections KW - Water supply KW - nutrients KW - Wells KW - Groundwater pollution KW - USA, Maine KW - Nutrients (mineral) KW - Monitoring KW - Groundwater KW - SW 5010:Network design KW - P 2000:FRESHWATER POLLUTION KW - M3 1010:Issues in Sustainable Development KW - M2 556.38:Groundwater Basins (556.38) KW - Q5 08502:Methods and instruments UR - http://libproxy.lib.unc.edu/login?url=http://search.proquest.com/docview/19918970?accountid=14244 L2 - http://vb3lk7eb4t.search.serialssolutions.com/?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&rfr_id=info:sid/Aquatic+Science+%26+Fisheries+Abstracts+%28ASFA%29+3%3A+Aquatic+Pollution+%26+Environmental+Quality&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=report&rft.jtitle=&rft.atitle=&rft.au=Caldwell%2C+J+M&rft.aulast=Caldwell&rft.aufirst=J&rft.date=2002-01-01&rft.volume=&rft.issue=&rft.spage=28&rft.isbn=&rft.btitle=Ground-Water+Levels+and+Water-Quality+Data+from+Monitoring+Wells+in+Windham%2C+Maine+Water+Years+1997-2001&rft.title=Ground-Water+Levels+and+Water-Quality+Data+from+Monitoring+Wells+in+Windham%2C+Maine+Water+Years+1997-2001&rft.issn=&rft_id=info:doi/ LA - English DB - ProQuest Environmental Science Collection N1 - Date revised - 2006-12-01 N1 - SuppNotes - Order this product from NTIS by: Phone at 1-800-553-NTIS (U.S. Customers); (703)605-6000 (Other countries); fax at (703)605-6900; email: orders[at]ntis.gov N1 - Last updated - 2016-12-21 ER - TY - RPRT T1 - Water-Quality and Ground-Water Hydrology of the Columbia/Eagle Bluffs Wetland Complex, Columbia, Missouri, 1992-99 AN - 19892099; 6261884 AB - In an effort to restore riverine wetlands along the Missouri River, the Missouri Department of Conservation constructed the 2,700-acre Eagle Bluffs Conservation Area. The primary water source for managing 1,200 wetland acres on the Eagle Bluffs Conservation Area is treated effluent received from a 91-acre constructed wastewater- treatment wetland operated by the city of Columbia, Missouri. The combined areas of the Eagle Bluffs Conservation Area and the wastewater- treatment wetland are termed the Columbia/ Eagle Bluffs Wetland Complex. The U.S. Geological Survey, in cooperation with the Missouri Department of Conservation and the city of Columbia, Missouri, collected samples quarterly from August 1992 to March 1999 from a monitoring network that included 33 ground-water sites and 4 surface-water sites to establish a baseline pre-effluent data set and to provide post- effluent data for trend analysis. JF - Water Resources Investigations Report. United States Geological Survey AU - Richards, J M Y1 - 2002///0, PY - 2002 DA - 0, 2002 PB - United States Geological Survey KW - Pollution Abstracts; ASFA 2: Ocean Technology Policy & Non-Living Resources; ASFA 3: Aquatic Pollution & Environmental Quality; Water Resources Abstracts KW - USGS-WRI-02-4227 KW - Water Pollution KW - water quality KW - Surface water KW - geological surveys KW - Statistical analysis KW - Groundwater Pollution KW - Freshwater KW - Artificial Wetlands KW - Sewage disposal KW - Baseline studies KW - Ground water KW - Hydrology KW - Wetlands KW - Urban areas KW - USA, Missouri R. KW - USA, Missouri, Columbia KW - Water Quality KW - Effluents KW - Water management KW - Conservation KW - Monitoring KW - Groundwater KW - Wastewater Treatment KW - P 2000:FRESHWATER POLLUTION KW - SW 3020:Sources and fate of pollution KW - Q2 09171:Dynamics of lakes and rivers KW - Q5 08521:Mechanical and natural changes UR - http://libproxy.lib.unc.edu/login?url=http://search.proquest.com/docview/19892099?accountid=14244 L2 - http://vb3lk7eb4t.search.serialssolutions.com/?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&rfr_id=info:sid/Aquatic+Science+%26+Fisheries+Abstracts+%28ASFA%29+3%3A+Aquatic+Pollution+%26+Environmental+Quality&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=report&rft.jtitle=&rft.atitle=&rft.au=Richards%2C+J+M&rft.aulast=Richards&rft.aufirst=J&rft.date=2002-01-01&rft.volume=&rft.issue=&rft.spage=&rft.isbn=&rft.btitle=Water-Quality+and+Ground-Water+Hydrology+of+the+Columbia%2FEagle+Bluffs+Wetland+Complex%2C+Columbia%2C+Missouri%2C+1992-99&rft.title=Water-Quality+and+Ground-Water+Hydrology+of+the+Columbia%2FEagle+Bluffs+Wetland+Complex%2C+Columbia%2C+Missouri%2C+1992-99&rft.issn=&rft_id=info:doi/ LA - English DB - ProQuest Environmental Science Collection N1 - Date revised - 2006-07-01 N1 - SuppNotes - Order this product from NTIS by: phone at 1-800-553-NTIS (U.S. customers); (703)605-6000 (other countries); fax at (703)605-6900; e-mail: orders[at]ntis.gov. NTIS Prices: AV A05; This document is color dependent and/or in landscape layout. It is currently available on CD-ROM and paper only. Sponsored by Missouri Dept. of Conservation, Columbia. N1 - Last updated - 2016-12-21 ER - TY - RPRT T1 - Characterization of Selenium in the Lower Gunnison River Basin, Colorado, 1988-2000 AN - 19892061; 6261833 AB - Selenium concentrations in certain water bodies in the lower Gunnison River Basin, including the lower Gunnison River and lower Uncompahgre River, have exceeded the Colorado water-quality standard of 5 micrograms per liter for selenium. A task force was formed in 1998 that consists of various government agencies, private irrigation companies, and local residents to address the selenium concerns in the lower Gunnison River Basin. The task force, working with the National Irrigation Water Quality Program, needed more detailed information on selenium loading in the basin to develop viable alternatives for remediating selenium in the lower Gunnison River Basin. JF - Water Resources Investigations Report. United States Geological Survey AU - Butler, D L AU - Leib, K J Y1 - 2002///0, PY - 2002 DA - 0, 2002 PB - United States Geological Survey KW - Pollution Abstracts; ASFA 3: Aquatic Pollution & Environmental Quality; Water Resources Abstracts KW - USGS-WRI-02-4151 KW - Irrigation water KW - water quality KW - River Basins KW - water bodies KW - Water Pollution Sources KW - Basins KW - Freshwater KW - Water quality KW - Selenium KW - Water Quality Standards KW - USA, Colorado, Gunnison Gorge, Gunnison R. KW - Freshwater pollution KW - Irrigation KW - River basins KW - Water quality standards KW - irrigation water KW - USA, Colorado KW - USA, Colorado, Gunnison R. KW - Irrigation Water KW - Water Resources KW - Government agencies KW - Q5 08503:Characteristics, behavior and fate KW - P 2000:FRESHWATER POLLUTION KW - SW 3020:Sources and fate of pollution UR - http://libproxy.lib.unc.edu/login?url=http://search.proquest.com/docview/19892061?accountid=14244 L2 - http://vb3lk7eb4t.search.serialssolutions.com/?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&rfr_id=info:sid/Aquatic+Science+%26+Fisheries+Abstracts+%28ASFA%29+3%3A+Aquatic+Pollution+%26+Environmental+Quality&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=report&rft.jtitle=&rft.atitle=&rft.au=Butler%2C+D+L%3BLeib%2C+K+J&rft.aulast=Butler&rft.aufirst=D&rft.date=2002-01-01&rft.volume=&rft.issue=&rft.spage=&rft.isbn=&rft.btitle=Characterization+of+Selenium+in+the+Lower+Gunnison+River+Basin%2C+Colorado%2C+1988-2000&rft.title=Characterization+of+Selenium+in+the+Lower+Gunnison+River+Basin%2C+Colorado%2C+1988-2000&rft.issn=&rft_id=info:doi/ LA - English DB - ProQuest Environmental Science Collection N1 - Date revised - 2005-08-01 N1 - SuppNotes - Available on CD-ROM and in paper copy only. Order this product from NTIS by: phone at 1-800-553-NTIS (U.S. customers); (703)605- 6000 (other countries); fax at (703)605-6900; e-mail: orders[at]ntis.gov. NTIS Prices: AV A04; This document is color dependent and/or in landscape layout. It is currently only available on CD-ROM. Prepared in cooperation with Shavano Soil Conservation District, CO. N1 - Last updated - 2016-12-21 ER - TY - RPRT T1 - Computed and Estimated Pollutant Loads, West Fork Trinity River, Fort Worth, Texas, 1997 AN - 19891757; 6261812 AB - Two models (described later in this report) have been developed to estimate the pollutant loads in storm runoff from urban basins in the Dallas-Fort Worth (DFW) metropolitan area, Texas. A deterministic model, the Watershed Management Model (WMM), estimates a total basin pollutant load by multiplying an event-mean concentration (EMC) by estimated runoff for each type of land use and then summing the loads for each land use (Rough River National Wet Weather Demonstration Project, 1998). A statistical model, developed by the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS), uses multi-variable regression equations to estimate pollutant loads in storm runoff. This report documents the derivation of estimated storm-runoff pollutant loads from the two models and compares the estimated loads with loads computed from measured data at USGS streamflow-gaging station 08048543 West Fork Trinity River at Beach Street, Forth Worth. The properties and constituents for which loads were computed are biochemical oxygen demand, chemical oxygen demand, suspended solids, dissolved solids, total nitrogen, total ammonia plus organic nitrogen (also known as total Kjeldahl nitrogen), total phosphorus, dissolved phosphorus, total recoverable copper, total recoverable lead, total recoverable zinc, and total diazinon. JF - Water Resources Investigations Report. United States Geological Survey AU - McKee, P W AU - McWreath, H C Y1 - 2002///0, PY - 2002 DA - 0, 2002 PB - United States Geological Survey KW - Pollution Abstracts; ASFA 3: Aquatic Pollution & Environmental Quality; Water Resources Abstracts KW - USGS-WRI-01-4253 KW - Land Use KW - Dissolved Solids KW - Storm Runoff KW - Heavy metals KW - Organic Loading KW - Phosphorus KW - Basins KW - Copper KW - Freshwater KW - Watersheds KW - USA, Texas, Fort Worth KW - Lead KW - organic phosphorus KW - ASW, USA, Texas KW - Rivers KW - Weather KW - Pollution Load KW - Chemical oxygen demand KW - Land use KW - Urban Areas KW - Urban Runoff KW - Biochemical oxygen demand KW - Runoff KW - Nitrogen KW - Water Pollution Sources KW - geological surveys KW - Chemical Oxygen Demand KW - Streams KW - USA, Texas, Trinity R. KW - Stormwater runoff KW - Watershed management KW - Dissolved solids KW - USA, Texas, Fort Worth, West Fork Trinity R. KW - organic nitrogen KW - metropolitan areas KW - River basin management KW - USA, Tennessee, Walker Branch, West Fork KW - Beaches KW - Mathematical models KW - Organic nitrogen KW - Suspended particulate matter KW - Biochemical Oxygen Demand KW - Water pollution KW - Diazinon KW - Q5 08503:Characteristics, behavior and fate KW - P 2000:FRESHWATER POLLUTION KW - SW 3020:Sources and fate of pollution UR - http://libproxy.lib.unc.edu/login?url=http://search.proquest.com/docview/19891757?accountid=14244 L2 - http://vb3lk7eb4t.search.serialssolutions.com/?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&rfr_id=info:sid/Aquatic+Science+%26+Fisheries+Abstracts+%28ASFA%29+3%3A+Aquatic+Pollution+%26+Environmental+Quality&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=report&rft.jtitle=&rft.atitle=&rft.au=McKee%2C+P+W%3BMcWreath%2C+H+C&rft.aulast=McKee&rft.aufirst=P&rft.date=2002-01-01&rft.volume=&rft.issue=&rft.spage=&rft.isbn=&rft.btitle=Computed+and+Estimated+Pollutant+Loads%2C+West+Fork+Trinity+River%2C+Fort+Worth%2C+Texas%2C+1997&rft.title=Computed+and+Estimated+Pollutant+Loads%2C+West+Fork+Trinity+River%2C+Fort+Worth%2C+Texas%2C+1997&rft.issn=&rft_id=info:doi/ LA - English DB - ProQuest Environmental Science Collection N1 - Date revised - 2005-08-01 N1 - SuppNotes - Available on CD-ROM and in paper copy only. Order this product from NTIS by: phone at 1-800-553-NTIS (U.S. customers); (703)605- 6000 (other countries); fax at (703)605-6900; e-mail: orders[at]ntis.gov. NTIS Prices: AV A03; This document is color dependent and/or in landscape layout. It is currently only available on CD-ROM. N1 - Last updated - 2016-12-21 ER - TY - RPRT T1 - Interactions between Surface Water and Ground Water and Effects on Mercury Transport in the North-Central Everglades AN - 19891705; 6261796 AB - The objective of the present investigation was to quantify interactions between surface water and ground water in the Everglades Nutrient Removal Project (ENR), a prototype project for the Stormwater Treatment Areas (STAs) that began operation in 1994. Determining the effect of ground water on the mercury balance off the ENR treatment wetland was an important additional objective. In order to broaden the relevance of conclusions to all parts of the north-central Everglades, interactions between surface water and ground water and mercury also were investigated in Water Conservation Area 2A (WCA-2A) and, to a lesser extent, in two other WCA basins, WCA-2B and WCA-3A. An important conclusion of this study is that creation of the WCA basins, and accompanying water-resources management, have appreciably increased both recharge and discharge in the north-central Everglades compared with pre-drainage conditions. JF - Water Resources Investigations Report. United States Geological Survey AU - Harvey, J W AU - Krupa, S L AU - Gefvert, C AU - Monney, R H AU - Choi, J AU - King, SA AU - Giddings, J B Y1 - 2002///0, PY - 2002 DA - 0, 2002 PB - United States Geological Survey KW - Pollution Abstracts; Sustainability Science Abstracts; Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts; Water Resources Abstracts KW - USGS-WRI-02-4050 KW - Recharge Basins KW - USA, Florida, Everglades KW - Water Pollution Treatment KW - Surface water KW - prototypes KW - Water conservation KW - Groundwater flow KW - Basins KW - Groundwater Pollution KW - Groundwater Basins KW - Surface-groundwater Relations KW - Nutrient Removal KW - Mercury KW - Wetlands KW - Groundwater KW - Mercury transport KW - M3 1010:Issues in Sustainable Development KW - P 2000:FRESHWATER POLLUTION KW - M2 556.38:Groundwater Basins (556.38) KW - SW 3020:Sources and fate of pollution UR - http://libproxy.lib.unc.edu/login?url=http://search.proquest.com/docview/19891705?accountid=14244 L2 - http://vb3lk7eb4t.search.serialssolutions.com/?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&rfr_id=info:sid/Sustainability+Science+Abstracts&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=report&rft.jtitle=&rft.atitle=&rft.au=Harvey%2C+J+W%3BKrupa%2C+S+L%3BGefvert%2C+C%3BMonney%2C+R+H%3BChoi%2C+J%3BKing%2C+SA%3BGiddings%2C+J+B&rft.aulast=Harvey&rft.aufirst=J&rft.date=2002-01-01&rft.volume=&rft.issue=&rft.spage=&rft.isbn=&rft.btitle=Interactions+between+Surface+Water+and+Ground+Water+and+Effects+on+Mercury+Transport+in+the+North-Central+Everglades&rft.title=Interactions+between+Surface+Water+and+Ground+Water+and+Effects+on+Mercury+Transport+in+the+North-Central+Everglades&rft.issn=&rft_id=info:doi/ LA - English DB - ProQuest Environmental Science Collection N1 - Date revised - 2006-12-01 N1 - SuppNotes - Order this product from NTIS by: phone at 1-800-553-NTIS (U.S. customers); (703)605-6000 (other countries); fax at (703)605-6900; e-mail: orders[at]ntis.gov. NTIS Prices: AV A06; This document is color dependent and/or in landscape layout. It is currently only available on CD-ROM. Prepared in cooperation with South Florida Water Management District, West Palm Beach. N1 - Last updated - 2016-12-21 ER - TY - RPRT T1 - Effects of Highway-Deicer Application on Ground-Water Quality in a Part of the Calumet Aquifer, Northwestern Indiana AN - 19891672; 6261787 AB - The effects of highway-deicer application on ground-water quality were studied at a site in northwestern Indiana using a variety of geochemical indicators. Site characteristics such as high snowfall rates; large quantities of applied deicers; presence of a high-traffic highway; a homogeneous, permeable, and unconfined aquifer; a shallow water table; a known ground-water- flow direction; and minimal potential for other sources of chloride and sodium to complicate source interpretation were used to select a study area where ground water was likely to be affected by deicer application. Forty-three monitoring wells were installed in an unconfined sand aquifer (the Calumet aquifer) near Beverly Shores in northwestern Indiana. Wells were installed along two transects that approximately paralleled groundwater flow in the Calumet aquifer and crossed US-12. US-12 is a highway that receives Indiana's highest level of maintenance to maintain safe driving conditions. Ground-water quality and water-level data collected from the monitoring wells, and precipitation and salt- application data were compiled from 1994 through 1997. JF - Water Resources Investigations Report. United States Geological Survey AU - Watson, L R AU - Bayless, E R AU - Buszka, P M AU - Wilson, J T Y1 - 2002///0, PY - 2002 DA - 0, 2002 SP - 158 PB - United States Geological Survey KW - Pollution Abstracts; Water Resources Abstracts; Sustainability Science Abstracts KW - USGS-WRI-01-4260 KW - shores KW - Aquifers KW - Chlorides KW - Groundwater Pollution KW - Water quality KW - shallow water KW - USA, Michigan, Calumet KW - Sand KW - Ground water KW - deicers KW - Highway Effects KW - Hydrologic Data KW - Highways KW - Deicers KW - Environmental assessment KW - Geochemistry KW - Maintenance KW - USA, Indiana KW - Sodium KW - Shallow water KW - Wells KW - Monitoring KW - Groundwater KW - Groundwater Movement KW - P 2000:FRESHWATER POLLUTION KW - SW 3020:Sources and fate of pollution KW - M3 1130:Water UR - http://libproxy.lib.unc.edu/login?url=http://search.proquest.com/docview/19891672?accountid=14244 L2 - http://vb3lk7eb4t.search.serialssolutions.com/?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&rfr_id=info:sid/Sustainability+Science+Abstracts&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=report&rft.jtitle=&rft.atitle=&rft.au=Watson%2C+L+R%3BBayless%2C+E+R%3BBuszka%2C+P+M%3BWilson%2C+J+T&rft.aulast=Watson&rft.aufirst=L&rft.date=2002-01-01&rft.volume=&rft.issue=&rft.spage=158&rft.isbn=&rft.btitle=Effects+of+Highway-Deicer+Application+on+Ground-Water+Quality+in+a+Part+of+the+Calumet+Aquifer%2C+Northwestern+Indiana&rft.title=Effects+of+Highway-Deicer+Application+on+Ground-Water+Quality+in+a+Part+of+the+Calumet+Aquifer%2C+Northwestern+Indiana&rft.issn=&rft_id=info:doi/ LA - English DB - ProQuest Environmental Science Collection N1 - Date revised - 2006-12-01 N1 - SuppNotes - Product reproduced from digital image. Order this product from NTIS by: phone at 1-800-553-NTIS (U.S. customers); (703)605-6000 (other countries); fax at (703)605-6900; e-mail: orders[at]ntis.gov. NTIS Prices: PC A09/MF A02; Prepared in cooperation with Indiana Dept. of Transportation, Indianapolis. N1 - Last updated - 2016-12-21 ER - TY - RPRT T1 - Physical Data and Biological Data for Algae, Aquatic Invertebrates, and Fish from Selected Reaches on the Carson and Truckee Rivers, Nevada and California, 1993-97 AN - 19855606; 7292831 AB - This report, a product of the National Water- Quality Assessment Program, is a compilation of physical data and biological data for algae, aquatic invertebrates, and fish collected in the Carson and Truckee River Basins, Nevada and California. Most of the data were collected between 1993 and 1996 at selected reaches on the Carson and Truckee Rivers. Algae and aquatic invertebrate samples were collected from cobble riffles, submerged woody-snag habitats, and from depositional areas such as pools. Between 1993 and 1996, fish and crayfish were collected from all wadeable habitats at each of seven basic-fixed sites using either electroshocking methods or seining. Additional fish and crayfish were collected at one site on the Truckee River in 1997. Fish were identified to species, measured for total and standard length, checked for anomalies, and weighed at the collection site. Fish were returned to the stream after measurements were taken. Measurements of water depth, stream velocity, determinations of substrate type and substrate embeddedness were made at each sampling site. Algae and aquatic invertebrate samples were sent to the U.S. Geological Survey National Water-Quality Laboratory for identification and enumeration. JF - Open-file Report. U.S. Geological Survey Y1 - 2002///0, PY - 2002 DA - 0, 2002 SP - 220 PB - United States Geological Survey KW - Entomology Abstracts; Microbiology Abstracts C: Algology, Mycology & Protozoology; ASFA 1: Biological Sciences & Living Resources; Pollution Abstracts; ASFA Marine Biotechnology Abstracts; Water Resources Abstracts KW - USGS-OFR-02-012 KW - Aquatic invertebrates KW - Algae KW - Physical data KW - Biological data KW - Fishes KW - Nevada KW - California KW - Data collection KW - Methods KW - Compilations KW - Sampling KW - Crayfish KW - Carson River KW - Truckee River KW - National Water Quality Assessment Program KW - Aquatic organisms KW - water quality KW - USA, California, Truckee R. KW - geological surveys KW - Cambaridae KW - USA, Nevada KW - Invertebrates KW - Freshwater fish KW - Streams KW - Habitats KW - Assessments KW - Substrate preferences KW - USA, Nevada, Truckee R. KW - Freshwater crustaceans KW - Substrates KW - Invertebrata KW - USA, California KW - Seining KW - Rivers KW - Biological surveys KW - Data processing KW - Velocity KW - River basins KW - Biometrics KW - Habitat KW - water depth KW - Quality control KW - Geological surveys KW - Length KW - Fish KW - seining KW - K 03410:Animal Diseases KW - Z 05300:General KW - P 2000:FRESHWATER POLLUTION KW - SW 0835:Streamflow and runoff KW - Q4 27770:Algae KW - Q1 08343:Taxonomy and morphology UR - http://libproxy.lib.unc.edu/login?url=http://search.proquest.com/docview/19855606?accountid=14244 L2 - http://vb3lk7eb4t.search.serialssolutions.com/?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&rfr_id=info:sid/Pollution+Abstracts&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=report&rft.jtitle=&rft.atitle=&rft.au=&rft.aulast=&rft.aufirst=&rft.date=2002-01-01&rft.volume=&rft.issue=&rft.spage=220&rft.isbn=&rft.btitle=Physical+Data+and+Biological+Data+for+Algae%2C+Aquatic+Invertebrates%2C+and+Fish+from+Selected+Reaches+on+the+Carson+and+Truckee+Rivers%2C+Nevada+and+California%2C+1993-97&rft.title=Physical+Data+and+Biological+Data+for+Algae%2C+Aquatic+Invertebrates%2C+and+Fish+from+Selected+Reaches+on+the+Carson+and+Truckee+Rivers%2C+Nevada+and+California%2C+1993-97&rft.issn=&rft_id=info:doi/ LA - English DB - ProQuest Environmental Science Collection N1 - Date revised - 2007-04-01 N1 - SuppNotes - Product reproduced from digital image. Order this product from NTIS by: phone at 1-800-553-NTIS (U.S. customers); (703)605-6000 (other countries); fax at (703)605-6900; e-mail: orders[at]ntis.gov. NTIS Prices: PC A11/MF A03 N1 - Last updated - 2016-05-27 ER - TY - RPRT T1 - 'Escherichia coli' at Ohio Bathing Beaches: Distribution, Sources, Wastewater Indicators, and Predictive Modeling AN - 19765430; 6261882 AB - This report describes field studies done throughout the recreational seasons (May through August) of 2000 and 2001 at six public bathing beaches in Ohio. Four types of studies were done - distribution, source, spatial, and routine studies. During all studies, water and (or) sediment samples were analyzed for E. coli concentrations. Additional water samples were collected to determine whether wastewater indicators could be used as surrogates for E. coli concentrations at bathing beaches. JF - Water Resources Investigations Report. United States Geological Survey AU - Francy, D S AU - Gifford, A M AU - Darner, R A Y1 - 2002///0, PY - 2002 DA - 0, 2002 SP - 60 PB - United States Geological Survey KW - Microbiology Abstracts B: Bacteriology; ASFA 3: Aquatic Pollution & Environmental Quality; Water Resources Abstracts KW - USGS-WRI-02-4285 KW - Water Analysis KW - Water Pollution Sources KW - Ecological distribution KW - Water Sampling KW - Indicators KW - Bathing KW - Water resources KW - Microbial contamination KW - Freshwater KW - Spatial Distribution KW - Wastewater Pollution KW - Lakes KW - Public Health KW - Escherichia coli KW - Modelling KW - Swimming KW - Beaches KW - Sediments KW - Water pollution KW - Model Studies KW - Escherichia Coli KW - Recreation KW - USA, Ohio KW - Waste water KW - Q5 08503:Characteristics, behavior and fate KW - SW 3050:Ultimate disposal of wastes KW - J 02450:Ecology UR - http://libproxy.lib.unc.edu/login?url=http://search.proquest.com/docview/19765430?accountid=14244 L2 - http://vb3lk7eb4t.search.serialssolutions.com/?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&rfr_id=info:sid/Aquatic+Science+%26+Fisheries+Abstracts+%28ASFA%29+3%3A+Aquatic+Pollution+%26+Environmental+Quality&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=report&rft.jtitle=&rft.atitle=&rft.au=Francy%2C+D+S%3BGifford%2C+A+M%3BDarner%2C+R+A&rft.aulast=Francy&rft.aufirst=D&rft.date=2002-01-01&rft.volume=&rft.issue=&rft.spage=60&rft.isbn=&rft.btitle=%27Escherichia+coli%27+at+Ohio+Bathing+Beaches%3A+Distribution%2C+Sources%2C+Wastewater+Indicators%2C+and+Predictive+Modeling&rft.title=%27Escherichia+coli%27+at+Ohio+Bathing+Beaches%3A+Distribution%2C+Sources%2C+Wastewater+Indicators%2C+and+Predictive+Modeling&rft.issn=&rft_id=info:doi/ LA - English DB - ProQuest Environmental Science Collection N1 - Date revised - 2006-12-01 N1 - SuppNotes - Product reproduced from digital image. Order this product from NTIS by: phone at 1-800-553-NTIS (U.S. customers); (703)605-6000 (other countries); fax at (703)605-6900; e-mail: orders[at]ntis.gov. NTIS Prices: PC A05/MF A01; Prepared in cooperation with Ohio Water Development Authority, Columbus. N1 - Last updated - 2016-12-21 ER - TY - RPRT T1 - Water Resources Data for New Jersey Water Year 2001. Volume 3. Water-Quality Data AN - 19585533; 7295055 AB - Water-resources data for the 2001 water year for New Jersey are presented in three volumes, and consists of records of stage, discharge, and quality of streams; stage and contents of lakes and reservoirs; and levels and quality of ground water. Volume 3 contains a summary of surface- and ground-water hydrologic conditions for the 2001 water year, a listing of current water- resources projects in New Jersey, a bibliography of water-related reports, articles and facts sheets for New Jersey completed by the Geological Survey in recent years, water-quality records of chemical analyses from 128 continuing-record surface-water stations, 29 miscellaneous surface-water sites, 53 ground-water sites, and records of daily statistics of temperature and other physical measurements from 44 continuous-recording stations. Locations of water-quality stations are shown in figures 22-24. Locations of miscellaneous water-quality sites are shown in figures 59-64. These data represent that part of the National Water Data System operated by the U.S. Geological Survey and cooperating federal, state, and local agencies in New Jersey. JF - Water Data Report. United States Geological Survey AU - DeLuca, MJ AU - Hoppe, H L AU - Doyle, HA AU - Gray, B J Y1 - 2002///0, PY - 2002 DA - 0, 2002 SP - 600 PB - United States Geological Survey KW - Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts; ASFA 3: Aquatic Pollution & Environmental Quality; Pollution Abstracts; Water Resources Abstracts KW - USGS-WDR-NJ-01-3 KW - Water resources KW - Hydrologic data KW - Water quality KW - New Jersey KW - Water year KW - Data collection KW - Surface water KW - Ground water KW - Hydrology KW - Streams KW - Sediments KW - Chemical analysis KW - Sampling sites KW - Gaging stations KW - Water chemistry KW - Lakes KW - Reservoirs KW - Water temperature KW - water quality KW - Statistics KW - Water resources data KW - Water reservoirs KW - USA, New Jersey KW - Data reports KW - geological surveys KW - Statistical analysis KW - Water Resources Data KW - Geological Surveys KW - Stages KW - Freshwater KW - Hydrologic Data KW - Temperature KW - River discharge KW - Bibliographies KW - Geological surveys KW - Groundwater KW - Q5 08503:Characteristics, behavior and fate KW - P 2000:FRESHWATER POLLUTION KW - SW 3020:Sources and fate of pollution KW - M2 556.18:Water Management (556.18) UR - http://libproxy.lib.unc.edu/login?url=http://search.proquest.com/docview/19585533?accountid=14244 L2 - http://vb3lk7eb4t.search.serialssolutions.com/?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&rfr_id=info:sid/Aquatic+Science+%26+Fisheries+Abstracts+%28ASFA%29+3%3A+Aquatic+Pollution+%26+Environmental+Quality&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=report&rft.jtitle=&rft.atitle=&rft.au=DeLuca%2C+MJ%3BHoppe%2C+H+L%3BDoyle%2C+HA%3BGray%2C+B+J&rft.aulast=DeLuca&rft.aufirst=MJ&rft.date=2002-01-01&rft.volume=&rft.issue=&rft.spage=600&rft.isbn=&rft.btitle=Water+Resources+Data+for+New+Jersey+Water+Year+2001.+Volume+3.+Water-Quality+Data&rft.title=Water+Resources+Data+for+New+Jersey+Water+Year+2001.+Volume+3.+Water-Quality+Data&rft.issn=&rft_id=info:doi/ LA - English DB - ProQuest Environmental Science Collection N1 - Date revised - 2007-04-01 N1 - SuppNotes - Product reproduced from digital image. Order this product from NTIS by: phone at 1-800-553-NTIS (U.S. customers); (703)605-6000 (other countries); fax at (703)605-6900; e-mail: orders[at]ntis.gov. NTIS Prices: PC$98.00/MF A06; Prepared in cooperation with New Jersey Dept. of Environmental Protection, Trenton. N1 - Last updated - 2016-05-27 ER - TY - RPRT T1 - Water Resources Data North Dakota, Water Year 2001. Volume 2. Ground Water AN - 19585505; 7295046 AB - Water-resources data for the 2001 water year for North Dakota consists of records of discharge, stage, and water quality for streams; contents, stage, and water quality for lakes and reservoirs; and water levels and water quality for ground-water wells. Volume 2 contains water-level records for 111 ground-water wells and water-quality records for 22 monitoring wells. These data represent that part of the National Water Data System operated by the U.S. Geological Survey and cooperating Federal, State, and local agencies in North Dakota. JF - Water Data Report. United States Geological Survey AU - Harkness, R E AU - Wald, J D Y1 - 2002///0, PY - 2002 DA - 0, 2002 PB - United States Geological Survey KW - Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts; Pollution Abstracts; Water Resources Abstracts KW - USGS-WDR-ND-01-2 KW - North Dakota KW - Water resources KW - Ground water KW - Surface waters KW - Hydrologic data KW - Chemical analysis KW - Water temperature KW - Sampling sites KW - Water levels KW - Water analysis KW - Water quality KW - Streams KW - Water wells KW - Lakes KW - Reservoirs KW - Discharge(Water) KW - Hydrology KW - Water chemistry KW - water quality KW - Water resources data KW - geological surveys KW - Water Quality KW - Water Level KW - Stages KW - Water Table KW - water levels KW - USA, North Dakota KW - Wells KW - Monitoring KW - Groundwater KW - P 2000:FRESHWATER POLLUTION KW - M2 556.18:Water Management (556.18) KW - SW 0840:Groundwater UR - http://libproxy.lib.unc.edu/login?url=http://search.proquest.com/docview/19585505?accountid=14244 L2 - http://vb3lk7eb4t.search.serialssolutions.com/?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&rfr_id=info:sid/Pollution+Abstracts&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=report&rft.jtitle=&rft.atitle=&rft.au=Harkness%2C+R+E%3BWald%2C+J+D&rft.aulast=Harkness&rft.aufirst=R&rft.date=2002-01-01&rft.volume=&rft.issue=&rft.spage=&rft.isbn=&rft.btitle=Water+Resources+Data+North+Dakota%2C+Water+Year+2001.+Volume+2.+Ground+Water&rft.title=Water+Resources+Data+North+Dakota%2C+Water+Year+2001.+Volume+2.+Ground+Water&rft.issn=&rft_id=info:doi/ LA - English DB - ProQuest Environmental Science Collection N1 - Date revised - 2007-04-01 N1 - SuppNotes - Available on CD-ROM and in paper copy only. Order this product from NTIS by: phone at 1-800-553-NTIS (U.S. customers); (703)605- 6000 (other countries); fax at (703)605-6900; e-mail: orders[at]ntis.gov. NTIS Prices: AV A10; This document is color dependent and/or in landscape layout. It is currently only available on CD-ROM. N1 - Last updated - 2016-05-27 ER - TY - RPRT T1 - Water Resources Data for Texas, Water Year 2001. Volume 4. Colorado River Basin, Lavaca River Basin, and Intervening Coastal Basins AN - 19585471; 7295037 AB - Water-resources data for the 2001 water year for Texas are presented in six volumes, and consist of records of stage, discharge, and water quality of streams and canals; stage, contents, and water-quality of lakes and reservoirs; and water levels and water quality of ground-water wells. Volume 4 contains records for water discharge at 66 gaging stations; stage and contents at 14 lakes and reservoirs; water quality at 41 gaging stations; and data for 12 partial-record stations comprised of 3 flood-hydrograph, 6 low-flow, 1 crest-stage, and 2 miscellaneous stations. Also included are lists of discontinued surface-water discharge or stage-only stations and discontinued surface-water quality stations. Additional water data were collected at various sites, not part of the systematic data-collection program, and are published as miscellaneous measurements. These data represent that part of the National Water Data System operated by the U.S. Geological Survey and cooperating Federal, State, and local agencies in Texas. Records for a few pertinent stations in the bordering States also are included. JF - Water Data Report. United States Geological Survey AU - Gandara, S C Y1 - 2002///0, PY - 2002 DA - 0, 2002 SP - 364 PB - United States Geological Survey KW - ASFA 2: Ocean Technology Policy & Non-Living Resources; Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts; Pollution Abstracts; Water Resources Abstracts KW - USGS-WDR-TX-01-4 KW - Texas KW - Surface waters KW - Hydrology KW - Hydrologic data KW - Discharge(Water) KW - Gaging stations KW - Water quality KW - Stage discharge relations KW - Water chemistry KW - Tables(Data) KW - Rivers KW - Chemical analysis KW - Coastal basins KW - water quality KW - River Basins KW - Water resources data KW - Water reservoirs KW - Surface water KW - Gaging Stations KW - Data reports KW - geological surveys KW - Basins KW - Water resources KW - Stages KW - Freshwater KW - Streams KW - ASW, USA, Texas KW - Reservoir water quality KW - Lakes KW - Hydrologic Data KW - Reservoirs KW - USA, Arizona, Colorado R. basin KW - Water Quality KW - River discharge KW - River basins KW - Water Level KW - Canals KW - Coastal zone KW - water levels KW - Geological surveys KW - Water wells KW - Governments KW - Groundwater KW - P 2000:FRESHWATER POLLUTION KW - SW 3020:Sources and fate of pollution KW - M2 556.18:Water Management (556.18) KW - Q2 09261:General UR - http://libproxy.lib.unc.edu/login?url=http://search.proquest.com/docview/19585471?accountid=14244 L2 - http://vb3lk7eb4t.search.serialssolutions.com/?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&rfr_id=info:sid/Pollution+Abstracts&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=report&rft.jtitle=&rft.atitle=&rft.au=Gandara%2C+S+C&rft.aulast=Gandara&rft.aufirst=S&rft.date=2002-01-01&rft.volume=&rft.issue=&rft.spage=364&rft.isbn=&rft.btitle=Water+Resources+Data+for+Texas%2C+Water+Year+2001.+Volume+4.+Colorado+River+Basin%2C+Lavaca+River+Basin%2C+and+Intervening+Coastal+Basins&rft.title=Water+Resources+Data+for+Texas%2C+Water+Year+2001.+Volume+4.+Colorado+River+Basin%2C+Lavaca+River+Basin%2C+and+Intervening+Coastal+Basins&rft.issn=&rft_id=info:doi/ LA - English DB - ProQuest Environmental Science Collection N1 - Date revised - 2007-04-01 N1 - SuppNotes - Product reproduced from digital image. Order this product from NTIS by: phone at 1-800-553-NTIS (U.S. customers); (703)605-6000 (other countries); fax at (703)605-6900; e-mail: orders[at]ntis.gov. NTIS Prices: PC A17/MF A03 N1 - Last updated - 2016-05-27 ER - TY - RPRT T1 - Water Resources Data California, Water Year 2001. Volume 4. Northern Central Valley Basins and the Great Basin from Honey Lake Basin to the Oregon State Line AN - 19585451; 7295026 AB - Water-resources data for the 2001 water year for California consist of records of stage, discharge, and water quality of streams, stage and contents in lakes and reservoirs, and water levels and water quality in wells. Volume 4 contains discharge records for 191 gaging stations, stage and contents for 53 lake and reservoirs, gage-height records for 1 station, and water quality for 18 stations. Also included are 3 miscellaneous partial- record sites, and 3 partial-record water-quality stations. These data represent that part of the National Water Data System operated by the U.S. Geological Survey and cooperating State and Federal agencies in California. JF - Water Data Report. United States Geological Survey AU - Rockwell, G L AU - Smithson, J R AU - Friebel, M F AU - Webster, MD Y1 - 2002///0, PY - 2002 DA - 0, 2002 SP - 486 PB - United States Geological Survey KW - ASFA 2: Ocean Technology Policy & Non-Living Resources; Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts; Pollution Abstracts; Water Resources Abstracts KW - USGS-WDR-CA-01-4 KW - California KW - Surface waters KW - Hydrology KW - Discharge(Water) KW - Gaging stations KW - Water quality KW - Flow rates KW - Water levels KW - Stage discharge relations KW - Lakes KW - Water chemistry KW - Temperatures KW - Northwestern Region(California) KW - water quality KW - Water resources data KW - Water reservoirs KW - Gaging Stations KW - Data reports KW - Lake basins KW - geological surveys KW - Basins KW - Water resources KW - Water Resources Data KW - Stages KW - Geological Surveys KW - Freshwater KW - Streams KW - lake basins KW - USA, California KW - Lake Basins KW - USA, Oregon KW - Hydrologic Data KW - Reservoirs KW - Water Quality KW - River discharge KW - USA, Great Basin KW - water levels KW - Geological surveys KW - Water wells KW - Governments KW - USA, California, Central Valley KW - P 2000:FRESHWATER POLLUTION KW - SW 3020:Sources and fate of pollution KW - M2 556.18:Water Management (556.18) KW - Q2 09261:General UR - http://libproxy.lib.unc.edu/login?url=http://search.proquest.com/docview/19585451?accountid=14244 L2 - http://vb3lk7eb4t.search.serialssolutions.com/?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&rfr_id=info:sid/Pollution+Abstracts&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=report&rft.jtitle=&rft.atitle=&rft.au=Rockwell%2C+G+L%3BSmithson%2C+J+R%3BFriebel%2C+M+F%3BWebster%2C+MD&rft.aulast=Rockwell&rft.aufirst=G&rft.date=2002-01-01&rft.volume=&rft.issue=&rft.spage=486&rft.isbn=&rft.btitle=Water+Resources+Data+California%2C+Water+Year+2001.+Volume+4.+Northern+Central+Valley+Basins+and+the+Great+Basin+from+Honey+Lake+Basin+to+the+Oregon+State+Line&rft.title=Water+Resources+Data+California%2C+Water+Year+2001.+Volume+4.+Northern+Central+Valley+Basins+and+the+Great+Basin+from+Honey+Lake+Basin+to+the+Oregon+State+Line&rft.issn=&rft_id=info:doi/ LA - English DB - ProQuest Environmental Science Collection N1 - Date revised - 2007-04-01 N1 - SuppNotes - Product reproduced from digital image. Order this product from NTIS by: phone at 1-800-553-NTIS (U.S. customers); (703)605-6000 (other countries); fax at (703)605-6900; e-mail: orders[at]ntis.gov. NTIS Prices: PC A22/MF A04 N1 - Last updated - 2016-05-27 ER - TY - RPRT T1 - Water Resources Data for Washington, Water Year 2001 AN - 19585413; 7295006 AB - Water resources data for the 2001 water year for Washington consist of records of stage, discharge, and water quality of streams; stage and contents of lakes and reservoirs; and water levels of wells. This report contains: water discharge for 239 gaging stations on streams, canals and drains; stage only records for 9 gaging stations; discharge data for 453 partial-record and miscellaneous sites; stage and (or) contents for 36 lakes and reservoirs; water-quality data for 40 surface-water sites; water levels for 37 observation wells; and water-quality data for 11 observation wells. JF - Water Data Report. United States Geological Survey AU - Kimbrough, R A AU - Ruppert, G P AU - Wiggins, W D AU - Smith, R R AU - Knowles, S M Y1 - 2002///0, PY - 2002 DA - 0, 2002 SP - 622 PB - United States Geological Survey KW - ASFA 2: Ocean Technology Policy & Non-Living Resources; Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts; Pollution Abstracts; Water Resources Abstracts KW - USGS-WDR/WA-01-1 KW - Washington(State) KW - Surface waters KW - Ground water KW - Hydrology KW - Discharge(Water) KW - Gaging stations KW - Water quality KW - Flow rates KW - Water levels KW - Lakes KW - Reservoirs KW - Rivers KW - Water temperature KW - Water chemistry KW - water quality KW - Water resources data KW - Water reservoirs KW - Surface water KW - Gaging Stations KW - Data reports KW - Reservoir Sites KW - Water resources KW - Water Resources Data KW - Stages KW - Freshwater KW - Streams KW - USA, Washington KW - Observation Wells KW - Hydrologic Data KW - River discharge KW - Canals KW - water levels KW - Water wells KW - P 2000:FRESHWATER POLLUTION KW - SW 3020:Sources and fate of pollution KW - M2 556.18:Water Management (556.18) KW - Q2 09261:General UR - http://libproxy.lib.unc.edu/login?url=http://search.proquest.com/docview/19585413?accountid=14244 L2 - http://vb3lk7eb4t.search.serialssolutions.com/?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&rfr_id=info:sid/Pollution+Abstracts&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=report&rft.jtitle=&rft.atitle=&rft.au=Kimbrough%2C+R+A%3BRuppert%2C+G+P%3BWiggins%2C+W+D%3BSmith%2C+R+R%3BKnowles%2C+S+M&rft.aulast=Kimbrough&rft.aufirst=R&rft.date=2002-01-01&rft.volume=&rft.issue=&rft.spage=622&rft.isbn=&rft.btitle=Water+Resources+Data+for+Washington%2C+Water+Year+2001&rft.title=Water+Resources+Data+for+Washington%2C+Water+Year+2001&rft.issn=&rft_id=info:doi/ LA - English DB - ProQuest Environmental Science Collection N1 - Date revised - 2007-04-01 N1 - SuppNotes - Product reproduced from digital image. Order this product from NTIS by: phone at 1-800-553-NTIS (U.S. customers); (703)605-6000 (other countries); fax at (703)605-6900; e-mail: orders[at]ntis.gov. NTIS Prices: PC A99/MF A06 N1 - Last updated - 2016-05-27 ER - TY - RPRT T1 - Water Resources Data for Arkansas, Water Year 2001 AN - 19584317; 7295054 AB - The Water Resources Division of the U.S. Geological Survey, in cooperation with State, Federal, and other local governmental agencies, obtains a large amount of data pertaining to the water resources of Arkansas each year. These data, accumulated during many water years, constitute a valuable data base for developing an improved understanding of the water resources of the State. Water resources data reported for the 2001 water year for Arkansas consist of records of discharge and water quality (physical measurements and chemical concentrations) of streams, water quality of lakes and ground-water levels and ground-water quality. Data from selected sites in Missouri and Oklahoma also are included. This report contains daily discharge records for 89 surface-water gaging stations, water-quality data for 70 surface- water stations and 5 wells, and water levels for 13 observation wells. Additional water data were collected at various sites, not part of the systematic data-collection program, and are published as miscellaneous measurements. JF - Water Data Report. United States Geological Survey AU - Porter, JE AU - Evans, DA AU - Remsing, L M Y1 - 2002///0, PY - 2002 DA - 0, 2002 SP - 412 PB - United States Geological Survey KW - ASFA 2: Ocean Technology Policy & Non-Living Resources; Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts; Pollution Abstracts; Water Resources Abstracts KW - USGS-WDR/AR-01-1 KW - Arkansas KW - Hydrologic data KW - Surface waters KW - Ground water KW - Water quality KW - Hydrology KW - Gaging stations KW - Water levels KW - Reservoirs KW - Water wells KW - Water chemistry KW - Water temperature KW - Tables(Data) KW - Lakes KW - Chemical analysis KW - Flow rate KW - Sediments KW - Sampling sites KW - Water analysis KW - Missouri KW - Oklahoma KW - water quality KW - Water resources data KW - Surface water KW - Gaging Stations KW - Data reports KW - geological surveys KW - Water resources KW - Water Resources Data KW - Geological Surveys KW - Freshwater KW - Streams KW - USA, Oklahoma KW - Observation Wells KW - USA, Missouri KW - Hydrologic Data KW - Data bases KW - Water Quality KW - River discharge KW - water levels KW - Geological surveys KW - USA, Arkansas KW - Governments KW - Groundwater KW - Resource development KW - Water Resources KW - P 2000:FRESHWATER POLLUTION KW - SW 3020:Sources and fate of pollution KW - M2 556.18:Water Management (556.18) KW - Q2 09261:General UR - http://libproxy.lib.unc.edu/login?url=http://search.proquest.com/docview/19584317?accountid=14244 L2 - http://vb3lk7eb4t.search.serialssolutions.com/?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&rfr_id=info:sid/Pollution+Abstracts&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=report&rft.jtitle=&rft.atitle=&rft.au=Porter%2C+JE%3BEvans%2C+DA%3BRemsing%2C+L+M&rft.aulast=Porter&rft.aufirst=JE&rft.date=2002-01-01&rft.volume=&rft.issue=&rft.spage=412&rft.isbn=&rft.btitle=Water+Resources+Data+for+Arkansas%2C+Water+Year+2001&rft.title=Water+Resources+Data+for+Arkansas%2C+Water+Year+2001&rft.issn=&rft_id=info:doi/ LA - English DB - ProQuest Environmental Science Collection N1 - Date revised - 2007-04-01 N1 - SuppNotes - Product reproduced from digital image. Order this product from NTIS by: phone at 1-800-553-NTIS (U.S. customers); (703)605-6000 (other countries); fax at (703)605-6900; e-mail: orders[at]ntis.gov. NTIS Prices: PC A19/MF A04 N1 - Last updated - 2016-05-27 ER - TY - RPRT T1 - Water Resources Data North Carolina, Water Year 2001. Volume 1B. Surface-Water Records AN - 19584304; 7295031 AB - Water-resources data for the 2001 water year for North Carolina consist of discharge records for 209 gaging stations; stage only records for 52 gaging stations; stage and contents for 62 lakes and reservoirs; water quality for 101 gaging stations and 91 miscellaneous sites; continuous daily tide stage at 4 sites and continuous precipitation at 98 sites. Additional water data were collected at 84 sites not involved in the systematic data- collection program, and are published as miscellaneous measurements. JF - Water Data Report. United States Geological Survey AU - Ragland, B C AU - Barker, R G AU - Robinson, J B Y1 - 2002///0, PY - 2002 DA - 0, 2002 SP - 682 PB - United States Geological Survey KW - ASFA 2: Ocean Technology Policy & Non-Living Resources; Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts; Pollution Abstracts; Water Resources Abstracts KW - USGS-WDR-NC-01-1B KW - Water resources KW - Hydrologic data KW - Water quality KW - New Jersey KW - Water year KW - Data collection KW - Surface water KW - Ground water KW - Hydrology KW - Streams KW - Sediments KW - Chemical analysis KW - Sampling sites KW - Gaging stations KW - Water chemistry KW - Lakes KW - Reservoirs KW - Water temperature KW - Flow rate KW - USA, North Carolina KW - water quality KW - Water resources data KW - Water reservoirs KW - Gaging Stations KW - Data reports KW - Reservoir Sites KW - Water Resources Data KW - Stages KW - Freshwater KW - Reservoir water quality KW - Discharge Measurement KW - Hydrologic Data KW - Water Quality KW - River discharge KW - Precipitation KW - Tides KW - P 2000:FRESHWATER POLLUTION KW - SW 3020:Sources and fate of pollution KW - M2 556.18:Water Management (556.18) KW - Q2 09261:General UR - http://libproxy.lib.unc.edu/login?url=http://search.proquest.com/docview/19584304?accountid=14244 L2 - http://vb3lk7eb4t.search.serialssolutions.com/?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&rfr_id=info:sid/Pollution+Abstracts&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=report&rft.jtitle=&rft.atitle=&rft.au=Ragland%2C+B+C%3BBarker%2C+R+G%3BRobinson%2C+J+B&rft.aulast=Ragland&rft.aufirst=B&rft.date=2002-01-01&rft.volume=&rft.issue=&rft.spage=682&rft.isbn=&rft.btitle=Water+Resources+Data+North+Carolina%2C+Water+Year+2001.+Volume+1B.+Surface-Water+Records&rft.title=Water+Resources+Data+North+Carolina%2C+Water+Year+2001.+Volume+1B.+Surface-Water+Records&rft.issn=&rft_id=info:doi/ LA - English DB - ProQuest Environmental Science Collection N1 - Date revised - 2007-04-01 N1 - SuppNotes - Product reproduced from digital image. Order this product from NTIS by: phone at 1-800-553-NTIS (U.S. customers); (703)605-6000 (other countries); fax at (703)605-6900; e-mail: orders[at]ntis.gov. NTIS Prices: PC A99/MF A06 N1 - Last updated - 2016-05-27 ER - TY - RPRT T1 - Water Resources Data for New Hampshire and Vermont, Water Year 2001 AN - 19584279; 7295024 AB - Water-resources data for the 2001 water year for New Hampshire and Vermont consists of stage, discharge, and water quality of streams; contents of lakes and reservoirs; and ground-water levels. This report contains discharge records for 75 gaging stations, stage records for 5 lakes, monthend contents for 2 lakes and reservoirs, water levels for 38 observation wells. Also included are data for 43 crest-stage partial-record stations. Additional water data were collected at various sites, which are not part of the systematic data-collection program and are published as miscellaneous measurements or under Supplemental National Water-Quality Assessment Data for Gaging Stations in New Hampshire and Vermont. A few pertinent stations in bordering states are also included in this report. These data represent that portion of the National Water Data System operated by the U.S. Geological Survey and cooperating State and Federal agencies in New Hampshire and Vermont. JF - Water Data Report. United States Geological Survey AU - Coakley, M F AU - Ward, S L AU - Hilgendorf, G S AU - Kiah, R G Y1 - 2002///0, PY - 2002 DA - 0, 2002 SP - 218 PB - United States Geological Survey KW - ASFA 2: Ocean Technology Policy & Non-Living Resources; Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts; Pollution Abstracts; Water Resources Abstracts KW - USGS-WDR/NH/VT-01-1 KW - New Hampshire KW - Vermont KW - Water resources KW - Hydrologic data KW - Discharge(Water) KW - Wateryear KW - Staging KW - Stage-Discharge Relations KW - Water quality KW - Lakes KW - Reserviors KW - Ground-water levels KW - Gaging stations KW - Wells KW - Water levels KW - Data collections KW - Water analysis KW - Chemical analysis KW - Surface water KW - Sediments KW - Sampling sites KW - Water temperature KW - Tables(Data) KW - water quality KW - Water resources data KW - Water reservoirs KW - Gaging Stations KW - Data reports KW - geological surveys KW - Stages KW - Geological Surveys KW - Freshwater KW - Streams KW - Observation Wells KW - USA, New Hampshire KW - Hydrologic Data KW - Discharge Measurement KW - Reservoirs KW - River discharge KW - water levels KW - Geological surveys KW - Water wells KW - Governments KW - Groundwater KW - USA, Vermont KW - P 2000:FRESHWATER POLLUTION KW - SW 3020:Sources and fate of pollution KW - M2 556.18:Water Management (556.18) KW - Q2 09261:General UR - http://libproxy.lib.unc.edu/login?url=http://search.proquest.com/docview/19584279?accountid=14244 L2 - http://vb3lk7eb4t.search.serialssolutions.com/?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&rfr_id=info:sid/Pollution+Abstracts&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=report&rft.jtitle=&rft.atitle=&rft.au=Coakley%2C+M+F%3BWard%2C+S+L%3BHilgendorf%2C+G+S%3BKiah%2C+R+G&rft.aulast=Coakley&rft.aufirst=M&rft.date=2002-01-01&rft.volume=&rft.issue=&rft.spage=218&rft.isbn=&rft.btitle=Water+Resources+Data+for+New+Hampshire+and+Vermont%2C+Water+Year+2001&rft.title=Water+Resources+Data+for+New+Hampshire+and+Vermont%2C+Water+Year+2001&rft.issn=&rft_id=info:doi/ LA - English DB - ProQuest Environmental Science Collection N1 - Date revised - 2007-04-01 N1 - SuppNotes - Also available on CD-ROM. Product reproduced from digital image. Order this product from NTIS by: phone at 1-800-553-NTIS (U.S. customers); (703)605-6000 (other countries); fax at (703)605- 6900; e-mail: orders[at]ntis.gov. NTIS Prices: PC A11/MF A03; See also PB2001-105383. N1 - Last updated - 2016-05-27 ER - TY - RPRT T1 - Water Resources Data California Water Year 2001. Volume 1. Southern Great Basin from Mexican Border to Mono Lake Basin, and Pacific Slope Basins from Tijuana River to Santa Maria River AN - 19584251; 7295017 AB - Water-resources data for the 2001 water year for California consist of records of stage, discharge, and water quality of streams, stage and contents in lakes and reservoirs, and water levels and water quality in wells. Volume 1 contains discharge records for 180 gaging stations and 13 crest-stage partial-record stations, stage and contents for 20 lakes and reservoirs, gage- height records for 2 stations, water quality for 37 streamflow- gaging stations and 2 partial-record stations, and precipitation data for 3 stations. These data represent that part of the National Water Data System operated by the U.S. Geological Survey and cooperating State and Federal agencies in California. JF - Water Data Report. United States Geological Survey AU - Agajanian, J AU - Rockwell, G L AU - Anderson, S W AU - Pope, G L Y1 - 2002///0, PY - 2002 DA - 0, 2002 SP - 520 PB - United States Geological Survey KW - ASFA 2: Ocean Technology Policy & Non-Living Resources; Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts; Pollution Abstracts; Water Resources Abstracts KW - USGS-WDR-CA-01-1 KW - California KW - Water resources KW - Hydrologic data KW - Chemical analysis KW - Discharge(Water) KW - Water quality KW - Streams KW - Lakes KW - Water lakes KW - Reservoirs KW - Wells KW - Gaging stations KW - Flow rate KW - River basins KW - Sediments KW - Stream flow KW - Precipitation(Atmosphere) KW - Tables(Data) KW - Water analysis KW - Surface waters KW - Sampling sites KW - Water temperatures KW - water quality KW - Precipitation data KW - Water resources data KW - Water reservoirs KW - Gaging Stations KW - Data reports KW - Lake basins KW - geological surveys KW - Basins KW - Stages KW - Freshwater KW - IS, Pacific KW - lake basins KW - INE, USA, California KW - Lake Basins KW - USA, California, Mono L. KW - Hydrologic Data KW - Discharge Measurement KW - Rivers KW - Water Quality KW - River discharge KW - USA, Great Basin KW - USA, California, Tijuana R. KW - water levels KW - Geological surveys KW - Water wells KW - Governments KW - P 2000:FRESHWATER POLLUTION KW - SW 3020:Sources and fate of pollution KW - M2 556.18:Water Management (556.18) KW - Q2 09261:General UR - http://libproxy.lib.unc.edu/login?url=http://search.proquest.com/docview/19584251?accountid=14244 L2 - http://vb3lk7eb4t.search.serialssolutions.com/?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&rfr_id=info:sid/Pollution+Abstracts&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=report&rft.jtitle=&rft.atitle=&rft.au=Agajanian%2C+J%3BRockwell%2C+G+L%3BAnderson%2C+S+W%3BPope%2C+G+L&rft.aulast=Agajanian&rft.aufirst=J&rft.date=2002-01-01&rft.volume=&rft.issue=&rft.spage=520&rft.isbn=&rft.btitle=Water+Resources+Data+California+Water+Year+2001.+Volume+1.+Southern+Great+Basin+from+Mexican+Border+to+Mono+Lake+Basin%2C+and+Pacific+Slope+Basins+from+Tijuana+River+to+Santa+Maria+River&rft.title=Water+Resources+Data+California+Water+Year+2001.+Volume+1.+Southern+Great+Basin+from+Mexican+Border+to+Mono+Lake+Basin%2C+and+Pacific+Slope+Basins+from+Tijuana+River+to+Santa+Maria+River&rft.issn=&rft_id=info:doi/ LA - English DB - ProQuest Environmental Science Collection N1 - Date revised - 2007-04-01 N1 - SuppNotes - Product reproduced from digital image. Order this product from NTIS by: phone at 1-800-553-NTIS (U.S. customers); (703)605-6000 (other countries); fax at (703)605-6900; e-mail: orders[at]ntis.gov. NTIS Prices: PC A23/MF A04; Water-data rept. (Annual), 1 Oct 00-30 Sep 01. N1 - Last updated - 2016-05-27 ER - TY - RPRT T1 - Water Resources Data Arizona, Water Year 2001 AN - 19584226; 7295008 AB - The Arizona District water data report includes records on both surface water and ground water in the State for water year 2001. Specifically, it contains: (1) Discharge records for 197 streamflow-gaging stations, for 29 crest-stage, partial-record streamflow stations, and 53 miscellaneous sites; (2) contents only records for 8 lakes and reservoirs; stage and (or) content records for 1 lake; (3) water-quality records for 16 continuous-record stations, 2 miscellaneous sites, and 155 wells; (4) ground-water levels and compaction values for 18 stations; and (5) water levels for 19 wells. JF - Water Data Report. United States Geological Survey AU - McCormack, H F AU - Fish, G G AU - Duet, N R AU - Evans, D W AU - Castillo, N K Y1 - 2002///0, PY - 2002 DA - 0, 2002 SP - 432 PB - United States Geological Survey KW - ASFA 2: Ocean Technology Policy & Non-Living Resources; Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts; Pollution Abstracts; Water Resources Abstracts KW - USGS-WDR-AZ-01-1 KW - Arizona KW - Surface water KW - Ground water KW - Hydrology KW - Discharge(Water) KW - Hydrologic data KW - Gaging stations KW - Water quality KW - Streamflow KW - Lakes KW - Reservoirs KW - Water levels KW - Chemical analysis KW - Water temperature KW - Tables(Data) KW - water quality KW - Water resources data KW - Water reservoirs KW - Data reports KW - Reservoir Sites KW - Water resources KW - Water Resources Data KW - Freshwater KW - Compaction KW - Flow rates KW - Hydrologic Data KW - River discharge KW - Water Level KW - Stream flow KW - water levels KW - Surface-groundwater Relations KW - Wells KW - USA, Arizona KW - Water wells KW - Groundwater KW - P 2000:FRESHWATER POLLUTION KW - M2 556.18:Water Management (556.18) KW - SW 6010:Structures KW - Q2 09261:General UR - http://libproxy.lib.unc.edu/login?url=http://search.proquest.com/docview/19584226?accountid=14244 L2 - http://vb3lk7eb4t.search.serialssolutions.com/?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&rfr_id=info:sid/Pollution+Abstracts&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=report&rft.jtitle=&rft.atitle=&rft.au=McCormack%2C+H+F%3BFish%2C+G+G%3BDuet%2C+N+R%3BEvans%2C+D+W%3BCastillo%2C+N+K&rft.aulast=McCormack&rft.aufirst=H&rft.date=2002-01-01&rft.volume=&rft.issue=&rft.spage=432&rft.isbn=&rft.btitle=Water+Resources+Data+Arizona%2C+Water+Year+2001&rft.title=Water+Resources+Data+Arizona%2C+Water+Year+2001&rft.issn=&rft_id=info:doi/ LA - English DB - ProQuest Environmental Science Collection N1 - Date revised - 2007-04-01 N1 - SuppNotes - Product reproduced from digital image. Order this product from NTIS by: phone at 1-800-553-NTIS (U.S. customers); (703)605-6000 (other countries); fax at (703)605-6900; e-mail: orders[at]ntis.gov. NTIS Prices: PC A20/MF A04 N1 - Last updated - 2016-05-27 ER - TY - RPRT T1 - Water Resources Data for Michigan, Water Year 2001 AN - 19584212; 7295004 AB - Water resources data for the 2001 water year for Michigan consists of records of stage, discharge, and water quality of streams; stage and contents of lakes and reservoirs; and water levels and water quality of ground-water wells. This report contains discharge records for 157 streamflow-gaging stations; stage only records for 2 stream-gaging stations and 25 lake-gaging stations; stage and contents for 1 reservoir; water-quality records for 38 streamflow-gaging stations; and water-level records for 47 ground-water wells. Also included are 30 crest-stage partial-record stations. Additional water data were collected at various sites not involved in the systematic data-collection program. Miscellaneous data were collected at 85 discharge measuring sites and 32 ground water special-study sites. These data represent that part of the National Water Data System collected by the U.S. Geological Survey and cooperating State, local, and Federal agencies in Michigan. JF - Water Data Report. United States Geological Survey AU - Blumer, S P AU - Behrendt, TE AU - Ellis, J M AU - Minnerick, R J AU - LeuVoy, R L Y1 - 2002///0, PY - 2002 DA - 0, 2002 SP - 468 PB - United States Geological Survey KW - ASFA 2: Ocean Technology Policy & Non-Living Resources; Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts; Pollution Abstracts; Water Resources Abstracts KW - USGS-WDR/MI-01/1 KW - Michigan KW - Hydrologic KW - Ground water KW - Surface water KW - Water quality KW - Discharge(Water) KW - Streamflow KW - Gaging stations KW - Lanes KW - Reservoirs KW - Data collection KW - Tables(Data) KW - water quality KW - Water resources data KW - Water reservoirs KW - Gauges KW - Data reports KW - geological surveys KW - Water resources KW - Water Resources Data KW - Stages KW - Geological Surveys KW - Freshwater KW - Streams KW - Water levels KW - Lakes KW - Water Quality KW - River discharge KW - Water Level KW - Water Table KW - USA, Michigan KW - water levels KW - Wells KW - Water wells KW - Groundwater KW - P 2000:FRESHWATER POLLUTION KW - SW 3020:Sources and fate of pollution KW - M2 556.18:Water Management (556.18) KW - Q2 09171:Dynamics of lakes and rivers UR - http://libproxy.lib.unc.edu/login?url=http://search.proquest.com/docview/19584212?accountid=14244 L2 - http://vb3lk7eb4t.search.serialssolutions.com/?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&rfr_id=info:sid/Pollution+Abstracts&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=report&rft.jtitle=&rft.atitle=&rft.au=Blumer%2C+S+P%3BBehrendt%2C+TE%3BEllis%2C+J+M%3BMinnerick%2C+R+J%3BLeuVoy%2C+R+L&rft.aulast=Blumer&rft.aufirst=S&rft.date=2002-01-01&rft.volume=&rft.issue=&rft.spage=468&rft.isbn=&rft.btitle=Water+Resources+Data+for+Michigan%2C+Water+Year+2001&rft.title=Water+Resources+Data+for+Michigan%2C+Water+Year+2001&rft.issn=&rft_id=info:doi/ LA - English DB - ProQuest Environmental Science Collection N1 - Date revised - 2007-04-01 N1 - SuppNotes - Product reproduced from digital image. Order this product from NTIS by: phone at 1-800-553-NTIS (U.S. customers); (703)605-6000 (other countries); fax at (703)605-6900; e-mail: orders[at]ntis.gov. NTIS Prices: PC A21/MF A04; See also PB2001-106513. N1 - Last updated - 2016-05-27 ER - TY - RPRT T1 - Water Resources Data for Florida, Water Year 2002 AN - 19583749; 7295064 AB - This report series for the 2002 water year for the state of Florida consists of records for continuous or daily discharge for 392 streams, periodic discharge for 15 streams, continuous or daily stage for 191 streams, periodic stage for 13 streams, peak stage and discharge for 33 streams, continuous or daily elevations for 14 lakes, periodic elevations for 49 lakes, continuous ground- water levels for 418 wells, periodic ground-water levels for 1,287 wells, and quality-of-water for 116 surface-water sites and 291 wells. This volume (Volume 4, Northwest Florida) contains records of continuous or daily discharge for 67 streams, periodic discharge for 1 stream, continuous or daily stage for 16 streams, periodic stage for 1 stream, peak stage and discharge for 29 streams, continuous or daily elevations for 1 lake, periodic elevations for 3 lakes, continuous ground-water levels for 2 wells, periodic ground-water levels for 3 wells, and quality-of- water for 5 surface-water sites and 0 wells. These data represent the National Water Data System records collected by the U.S. Geological Survey and cooperating local, State, and Federal agencies in Florida. JF - Water Data Report. United States Geological Survey Y1 - 2002///0, PY - 2002 DA - 0, 2002 SP - 188 PB - United States Geological Survey KW - ASFA 2: Ocean Technology Policy & Non-Living Resources; Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts; Water Resources Abstracts KW - USGS-WDR/FL-02-4 KW - Water resources KW - Florida KW - Surface waters KW - Ground waters KW - Water quality KW - Flow rates KW - Water levels KW - Water analysis KW - Monitoring wells KW - Lakes KW - Reservoirs KW - Elevations KW - Discharges KW - Chemical analysis KW - Tables(Data) KW - Water temperatures KW - Water resources data KW - USA, Florida KW - Data reports KW - River discharge KW - Stages KW - Water Level KW - Geological Surveys KW - Freshwater KW - Streams KW - Wells KW - Elevation KW - Geological surveys KW - Governments KW - Stream Discharge KW - Groundwater KW - M2 556.18:Water Management (556.18) KW - SW 6010:Structures KW - Q2 09261:General UR - http://libproxy.lib.unc.edu/login?url=http://search.proquest.com/docview/19583749?accountid=14244 L2 - http://vb3lk7eb4t.search.serialssolutions.com/?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&rfr_id=info:sid/Water+Resources+Abstracts&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=report&rft.jtitle=&rft.atitle=&rft.au=&rft.aulast=&rft.aufirst=&rft.date=2002-01-01&rft.volume=&rft.issue=&rft.spage=188&rft.isbn=&rft.btitle=Water+Resources+Data+for+Florida%2C+Water+Year+2002&rft.title=Water+Resources+Data+for+Florida%2C+Water+Year+2002&rft.issn=&rft_id=info:doi/ LA - English DB - ProQuest Environmental Science Collection N1 - Date revised - 2007-04-01 N1 - SuppNotes - Product reproduced from digital image. Order this product from NTIS by: phone at 1-800-553-NTIS (U.S. customers); (703)605-6000 (other countries); fax at (703)605-6900; e-mail: orders[at]ntis.gov. NTIS Prices: PC A10/MF A02 N1 - Last updated - 2016-05-27 ER - TY - RPRT T1 - Water Resources Data for Kansas, Water Year 2002 AN - 19583734; 7295060 AB - Water-resources data for the 2002 water year for Kansas consist of records of stage, discharge, and water quality of streams; elevation and contents of lakes and reservoirs; and water levels of ground-water wells. This report contains records for water discharge at 149 complete-record gaging stations; elevation and contents at 20 lakes and reservoirs; water quality records at 2 precipitation stations, water-level data at 18 observation wells; and records of specific conductance, pH, water temperature, dissolved oxygen, and turbidity at 11 gaging stations. Also included are discharge data for 26 high-flow partial-record stations, miscellaneous onsite water-quality data collected at 142 stations, and suspended-sediment concentration for 12 stations. These data represent that part of the National Water Information System collected by the U.S. Geological Survey in cooperation with local, State, and Federal agencies in Kansas. JF - Water Data Report. United States Geological Survey AU - Putnam, JE AU - Schneider Y1 - 2002///0, PY - 2002 DA - 0, 2002 SP - 558 PB - United States Geological Survey KW - ASFA 2: Ocean Technology Policy & Non-Living Resources; Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts; Pollution Abstracts; Water Resources Abstracts KW - USGS-WDR/KS-02-1 KW - Water resources KW - Kansas KW - Surface waters KW - Ground waters KW - Water quality KW - Flow rates KW - Water levels KW - Water analysis KW - Monitoring wells KW - Lakes KW - Reservoirs KW - Chemical analysis KW - Tables(Data) KW - Water temperatures KW - Oxygen isotopes in precipitation KW - water quality KW - Water resources data KW - Water reservoirs KW - Gaging Stations KW - Data reports KW - geological surveys KW - Freshwater KW - Streams KW - Dissolved oxygen KW - Reservoir water quality KW - Hydrologic Data KW - Discharge Measurement KW - pH KW - Water Quality KW - River discharge KW - USA, Kansas KW - Water Level KW - Precipitation KW - water levels KW - Elevation KW - Water wells KW - Governments KW - Groundwater KW - water temperature KW - Turbidity KW - Information systems KW - SW 5010:Network design KW - P 2000:FRESHWATER POLLUTION KW - M2 556.18:Water Management (556.18) KW - Q2 09261:General UR - http://libproxy.lib.unc.edu/login?url=http://search.proquest.com/docview/19583734?accountid=14244 L2 - http://vb3lk7eb4t.search.serialssolutions.com/?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&rfr_id=info:sid/Pollution+Abstracts&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=report&rft.jtitle=&rft.atitle=&rft.au=Putnam%2C+JE%3BSchneider&rft.aulast=Putnam&rft.aufirst=JE&rft.date=2002-01-01&rft.volume=&rft.issue=&rft.spage=558&rft.isbn=&rft.btitle=Water+Resources+Data+for+Kansas%2C+Water+Year+2002&rft.title=Water+Resources+Data+for+Kansas%2C+Water+Year+2002&rft.issn=&rft_id=info:doi/ LA - English DB - ProQuest Environmental Science Collection N1 - Date revised - 2007-04-01 N1 - SuppNotes - Product reproduced from digital image. Order this product from NTIS by: phone at 1-800-553-NTIS (U.S. customers); (703)605-6000 (other countries); fax at (703)605-6900; e-mail: orders[at]ntis.gov. NTIS Prices: PC A25/MF A04 N1 - Last updated - 2016-05-27 ER - TY - RPRT T1 - Water Resources Data for New York, Water Year, 2001. Volume 1. Eastern New York, Excluding Long Island AN - 19583707; 7295056 AB - Water resources data for the 2001 water year for New York consist of records of stage, discharge, and water quality of streams; stage, contents, and water quality of lakes and reservoirs; and ground-water levels. This volume contains records for water discharge at 144 gaging stations; stage only at 10 gaging stations; stage and contents at 4 gaging stations, and 18 other lakes and reservoirs; water quality at 34 gaging stations; and water levels at 7 observation wells. Also included are data for 34 crest-stage partial-record stations. Locations of all these sites are shown on figure 8. Additional water data were collected at various sites not involved in the systematic data-collection program, and are published as miscellaneous measurements and analyses. These data together with the data in volumes 2 and 3 represent that part of the National Water Data System operated by the U.S. Geological Survey in cooperation with State, Municipal, and Federal agencies in New York. JF - Water Data Report. United States Geological Survey AU - Butch, G K AU - Murray, P M AU - Robideau, JA AU - Gardner, JA Y1 - 2002///0, PY - 2002 DA - 0, 2002 SP - 603 PB - United States Geological Survey KW - ASFA 2: Ocean Technology Policy & Non-Living Resources; Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts; Pollution Abstracts; Water Resources Abstracts KW - USGS-WDR/NY-01-1 KW - New York KW - Surface waters KW - Ground water KW - Hydrology KW - Discharge(Water) KW - Gaging stations KW - Water quality KW - Flow rates KW - Water levels KW - Lakes KW - Reservoirs KW - Rivers KW - Water temperature KW - Water chemistry KW - Sediments KW - Stream flow KW - water quality KW - Water resources data KW - Water reservoirs KW - Gaging Stations KW - Data reports KW - geological surveys KW - Water resources KW - Water Resources Data KW - Stages KW - Geological Surveys KW - Freshwater KW - Streams KW - Reservoir water quality KW - Discharge Measurement KW - Water Quality KW - River discharge KW - water levels KW - Geological surveys KW - USA, New York, Long Island KW - Water wells KW - Governments KW - Groundwater KW - P 2000:FRESHWATER POLLUTION KW - SW 3020:Sources and fate of pollution KW - M2 556.18:Water Management (556.18) KW - Q2 09261:General UR - http://libproxy.lib.unc.edu/login?url=http://search.proquest.com/docview/19583707?accountid=14244 L2 - http://vb3lk7eb4t.search.serialssolutions.com/?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&rfr_id=info:sid/Pollution+Abstracts&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=report&rft.jtitle=&rft.atitle=&rft.au=Butch%2C+G+K%3BMurray%2C+P+M%3BRobideau%2C+JA%3BGardner%2C+JA&rft.aulast=Butch&rft.aufirst=G&rft.date=2002-01-01&rft.volume=&rft.issue=&rft.spage=603&rft.isbn=&rft.btitle=Water+Resources+Data+for+New+York%2C+Water+Year%2C+2001.+Volume+1.+Eastern+New+York%2C+Excluding+Long+Island&rft.title=Water+Resources+Data+for+New+York%2C+Water+Year%2C+2001.+Volume+1.+Eastern+New+York%2C+Excluding+Long+Island&rft.issn=&rft_id=info:doi/ LA - English DB - ProQuest Environmental Science Collection N1 - Date revised - 2007-04-01 N1 - SuppNotes - Product reproduced from digital image. Order this product from NTIS by: phone at 1-800-553-NTIS (U.S. customers); (703)605-6000 (other countries); fax at (703)605-6900; e-mail: orders[at]ntis.gov. NTIS Prices: PC A99/MF A06 N1 - Last updated - 2016-05-27 ER - TY - RPRT T1 - Water Resources Data for Missouri, Water Year 2001 AN - 19583687; 7295044 AB - The U.S. Geological Survey, Water Resources Division, in cooperation with local, State, and Federal agencies and organizations, obtains a large quantity of data pertaining to the water resources of Missouri each water year (October 1 to September 30). These data, accumulated during the water years, constitute a valuable data base for developing an improved understanding of the water resources of Missouri. Water-resources data for the 2001 water year for Missouri consist of records of stage, discharge, and water quality of streams; elevation at 12 lakes and reservoirs; water quality at 112 sampling stations (including 2 lakes); and data for 39 crest-stage stations. JF - Water Data Report. United States Geological Survey AU - Hauck, H S AU - Nagel, C D Y1 - 2002///0, PY - 2002 DA - 0, 2002 SP - 528 PB - United States Geological Survey KW - ASFA 2: Ocean Technology Policy & Non-Living Resources; Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts; Pollution Abstracts; Water Resources Abstracts KW - USGS-WDR/MO-01-1 KW - Missouri KW - Surface waters KW - Ground water KW - Hydrologic data KW - Hydrology KW - Discharge(Water) KW - Gaging stations KW - Water quality KW - Flow rates KW - Water temperature KW - Stage discharge relations KW - Chemical analysis KW - Tables(Data) KW - Sediments KW - Lakes KW - Reservoirs KW - Sampling KW - Water levels KW - Streams KW - Data collection KW - water quality KW - Water resources data KW - Water reservoirs KW - Data reports KW - geological surveys KW - Water resources KW - Water Resources Data KW - Stages KW - Freshwater KW - Reservoir water quality KW - USA, Missouri KW - Hydrologic Data KW - Data bases KW - Water Quality KW - River discharge KW - Developmental stages KW - Elevation KW - Governments KW - Resource development KW - Water Resources KW - Q2 09127:General papers on resources KW - P 2000:FRESHWATER POLLUTION KW - SW 0810:General KW - M2 556.18:Water Management (556.18) UR - http://libproxy.lib.unc.edu/login?url=http://search.proquest.com/docview/19583687?accountid=14244 L2 - http://vb3lk7eb4t.search.serialssolutions.com/?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&rfr_id=info:sid/Pollution+Abstracts&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=report&rft.jtitle=&rft.atitle=&rft.au=Hauck%2C+H+S%3BNagel%2C+C+D&rft.aulast=Hauck&rft.aufirst=H&rft.date=2002-01-01&rft.volume=&rft.issue=&rft.spage=528&rft.isbn=&rft.btitle=Water+Resources+Data+for+Missouri%2C+Water+Year+2001&rft.title=Water+Resources+Data+for+Missouri%2C+Water+Year+2001&rft.issn=&rft_id=info:doi/ LA - English DB - ProQuest Environmental Science Collection N1 - Date revised - 2007-04-01 N1 - SuppNotes - Product reproduced from digital image. Order this product from NTIS by: phone at 1-800-553-NTIS (U.S. customers); (703)605-6000 (other countries); fax at (703)605-6900; e-mail: orders[at]ntis.gov. NTIS Prices: PC A24/MF A04; See also PB2001-105028. N1 - Last updated - 2016-05-27 ER - TY - RPRT T1 - Water Resources Data for New York, Water Year 2002. Volume 1: Eastern New York Excluding Long Island AN - 19583661; 7295067 AB - Water resources data for the 2002 water year for New York consist of records of stage, discharge, and water quality of streams; stage, contents, and water quality of lakes and reservoirs; and ground-water levels. This volume contains records for water discharge at 147 gaging stations; stage only at 8 gaging stations; stage and contents at 4 gaging stations, and 18 other lakes and reservoirs; water quality at 29 gaging stations; and water levels at 14 observation wells. Also included are data for 32 crest-stage partial-record stations. Locations of all these sites are shown on figure 8. Additional water data were collected at various sites not involved in the systematic data-collection program, and are published as miscellaneous measurements and analyses. These data together with the data in volumes 2 and 3 represent that part of the National Water Data System operated by the U.S. Geological Survey in cooperation with State, Municipal, and Federal agencies in New York. JF - Water Data Report. United States Geological Survey AU - Butch, G K AU - Murray, P M AU - Hebert, G J AU - Weigel, J F Y1 - 2002///0, PY - 2002 DA - 0, 2002 SP - 548 PB - United States Geological Survey KW - ASFA 2: Ocean Technology Policy & Non-Living Resources; Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts; Pollution Abstracts; Water Resources Abstracts KW - USGS-WDR/NY-02-1 KW - New York KW - Stream flow KW - Ground water KW - Water supply KW - Water quality KW - Water resources KW - Lakes KW - Reservoirs KW - Chemical analysis KW - Sediments KW - Gaging stations KW - Data collection KW - Tables(Data) KW - Graphs(Charts) KW - water quality KW - Water resources data KW - Water reservoirs KW - Gaging Stations KW - Data reports KW - geological surveys KW - Water Resources Data KW - Stages KW - Geological Surveys KW - Freshwater KW - Streams KW - Water levels KW - Reservoir water quality KW - Discharge Measurement KW - Water Quality KW - River discharge KW - water levels KW - Geological surveys KW - USA, New York, Long Island KW - Water wells KW - Governments KW - Groundwater KW - P 2000:FRESHWATER POLLUTION KW - SW 3020:Sources and fate of pollution KW - M2 556.18:Water Management (556.18) KW - Q2 09261:General UR - http://libproxy.lib.unc.edu/login?url=http://search.proquest.com/docview/19583661?accountid=14244 L2 - http://vb3lk7eb4t.search.serialssolutions.com/?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&rfr_id=info:sid/Pollution+Abstracts&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=report&rft.jtitle=&rft.atitle=&rft.au=Butch%2C+G+K%3BMurray%2C+P+M%3BHebert%2C+G+J%3BWeigel%2C+J+F&rft.aulast=Butch&rft.aufirst=G&rft.date=2002-01-01&rft.volume=&rft.issue=&rft.spage=548&rft.isbn=&rft.btitle=Water+Resources+Data+for+New+York%2C+Water+Year+2002.+Volume+1%3A+Eastern+New+York+Excluding+Long+Island&rft.title=Water+Resources+Data+for+New+York%2C+Water+Year+2002.+Volume+1%3A+Eastern+New+York+Excluding+Long+Island&rft.issn=&rft_id=info:doi/ LA - English DB - ProQuest Environmental Science Collection N1 - Date revised - 2007-04-01 N1 - SuppNotes - Product reproduced from digital image. Order this product from NTIS by: phone at 1-800-553-NTIS (U.S. customers); (703)605-6000 (other countries); fax at (703)605-6900; e-mail: orders[at]ntis.gov. NTIS Prices: PC A24/MF A04; See also PB2003-106504. N1 - Last updated - 2016-05-27 ER - TY - RPRT T1 - Water Resources Data for Indiana, Water Year 2001 AN - 19583655; 7295040 AB - Water resources data for the 2001 water year for Indiana consists of records of discharge, stage, and water quality of streams and wells; reservoir stage for 8 stream stations, stage and contents for 1 reservoir, water quality for 1 stream, water temperature at 11 sites, sediment analysis for 1 stream, water levels for 78 lakes and 88 observation wells. Also included are records of miscellaneous discharge measurements, miscellaneous levels and miscellaneous water-quality, not part of the systematic data-collecting program. Data contained in this report represent that part of the National Water Data System operated by the U.S. Geological Survey in Indiana in cooperation with State and Federal agencies. JF - Water Data Report. United States Geological Survey AU - Stewart, JA AU - Keeton, C R AU - Hammil, LE AU - Nguyen, H T AU - Majors, D K Y1 - 2002///0, PY - 2002 DA - 0, 2002 SP - 708 PB - United States Geological Survey KW - ASFA 2: Ocean Technology Policy & Non-Living Resources; Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts; Pollution Abstracts; Water Resources Abstracts KW - USGS-WDR/IN-01-1 KW - Indiana KW - Water resources KW - Hydrologic data KW - Discharge water KW - Stage-discharge relations KW - Water levels KW - Water quality KW - Surface waters KW - Water analysis KW - Ground water KW - Gaging stations KW - Tables(Data) KW - National Water Data System KW - water quality KW - Water resources data KW - Water reservoirs KW - Water Temperature KW - Data reports KW - geological surveys KW - Water Resources Data KW - Stages KW - Geological Surveys KW - Freshwater KW - Streams KW - Sediment analysis KW - Water temperatures KW - Observation Wells KW - Reservoir water quality KW - Lakes KW - sediment analysis KW - Discharge Measurement KW - Reservoirs KW - Water Quality KW - River discharge KW - USA, Indiana KW - water levels KW - Geological surveys KW - Water wells KW - Governments KW - Stream Discharge KW - water temperature KW - P 2000:FRESHWATER POLLUTION KW - SW 3010:Identification of pollutants KW - M2 556.18:Water Management (556.18) KW - Q2 09261:General UR - http://libproxy.lib.unc.edu/login?url=http://search.proquest.com/docview/19583655?accountid=14244 L2 - http://vb3lk7eb4t.search.serialssolutions.com/?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&rfr_id=info:sid/Pollution+Abstracts&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=report&rft.jtitle=&rft.atitle=&rft.au=Stewart%2C+JA%3BKeeton%2C+C+R%3BHammil%2C+LE%3BNguyen%2C+H+T%3BMajors%2C+D+K&rft.aulast=Stewart&rft.aufirst=JA&rft.date=2002-01-01&rft.volume=&rft.issue=&rft.spage=708&rft.isbn=&rft.btitle=Water+Resources+Data+for+Indiana%2C+Water+Year+2001&rft.title=Water+Resources+Data+for+Indiana%2C+Water+Year+2001&rft.issn=&rft_id=info:doi/ LA - English DB - ProQuest Environmental Science Collection N1 - Date revised - 2007-04-01 N1 - SuppNotes - Product reproduced from digital image. Order this product from NTIS by: phone at 1-800-553-NTIS (U.S. customers); (703)605-6000 (other countries); fax at (703)605-6900; e-mail: orders[at]ntis.gov. NTIS is located at 5285 Port Royal Road, Springfield, VA, 22161, USA. NTIS Prices: PC A99/MF A06 N1 - Last updated - 2016-05-27 ER - TY - RPRT T1 - Water Resources Data for Georgia, 2002 (on CD-ROM) AN - 19583635; 7295059 AB - The 2002 Water Resources Data CDROM includes the ability to delineate drainage areas for selected surface water stations; the ability to perform a radial search of USGS stations and wells by latitude and longitude; and the incorporation of 10-digit watersheds (hydrologic units) for spatial analysis. The format on the CDROM is based on a geographic information system (GIS) user interface that allows the user to view map locations of they hydrologic monitoring stations, and networks within respective river basins. Several methods are provided for users to easily search for and retrieve data on various stations. Graphical summaries of the current water year for surface-water data or calendar year for ground-water and selected historical streamflow and ground-water-level data show seasonal and annual stream and ground-water characteristics. Users can view or print site information and data tables in the traditional paper format, or download data for use with other application data for use with other applications. Data Sets contained on this CD-ROM include: continuous daily mean water levels (at selected stations); continuous daily mean streamflow; continuous daily total precipitation; continuous daily water quality (turbidity is new for 2002); continuous ground-water levels; non-continuous peak streamflow; miscellaneous streamflow measurements; periodic surface-water quality; periodic ground-water quality; and historical continuous daily mean streamflow (all active and non- active sites). JF - Water Data Report. United States Geological Survey Y1 - 2002///0, PY - 2002 DA - 0, 2002 PB - United States Geological Survey KW - ASFA 2: Ocean Technology Policy & Non-Living Resources; Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts; Pollution Abstracts; Water Resources Abstracts KW - USGS-WDR/GA-02-1-CD, USGS-WDR/GA-02-2-CD KW - Streams KW - Hydrology KW - Georgia KW - Gaging stations KW - Stream flow KW - Discharge(Water) KW - Water levels KW - Lakes KW - Reservoirs KW - Water table KW - Water pollution KW - Surface waters KW - Water supply KW - CD-ROM KW - Water quality data KW - Hydrologic data KW - Historical account KW - water quality KW - Water resources data KW - Water Analysis KW - Surface water KW - Data reports KW - Remote sensing KW - Water resources KW - Water Resources Data KW - Freshwater KW - Watersheds KW - Water quality KW - Flow rates KW - Sulfur dioxide KW - Geographic Information Systems (GIS) KW - longitude KW - Hydrologic Data KW - Monitoring systems KW - Geographical Information Systems KW - spatial analysis KW - Streamflow measurements KW - Drainage KW - USA, Georgia KW - Streamflow KW - River basins KW - Water Level KW - Precipitation KW - water levels KW - Water wells KW - Geographic information systems KW - latitude KW - Groundwater KW - Turbidity KW - P 2000:FRESHWATER POLLUTION KW - SW 3010:Identification of pollutants KW - M2 556.18:Water Management (556.18) KW - Q2 09261:General UR - http://libproxy.lib.unc.edu/login?url=http://search.proquest.com/docview/19583635?accountid=14244 L2 - http://vb3lk7eb4t.search.serialssolutions.com/?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&rfr_id=info:sid/Pollution+Abstracts&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=report&rft.jtitle=&rft.atitle=&rft.au=&rft.aulast=&rft.aufirst=&rft.date=2002-01-01&rft.volume=&rft.issue=&rft.spage=&rft.isbn=&rft.btitle=Water+Resources+Data+for+Georgia%2C+2002+%28on+CD-ROM%29&rft.title=Water+Resources+Data+for+Georgia%2C+2002+%28on+CD-ROM%29&rft.issn=&rft_id=info:doi/ LA - English DB - ProQuest Environmental Science Collection N1 - Date revised - 2007-04-01 N1 - SuppNotes - Available on one CD-ROM disc. Order this product from NTIS by: phone at 1-800-553-NTIS (U.S. customers); (703)605-6000 (other countries); fax at (703)605-6900; e-mail: orders[at]ntis.gov. NTIS Prices: CD-ROM CP D01; See also PB2003-104692 and PB2003-104693. N1 - Last updated - 2016-05-27 ER - TY - RPRT T1 - Water Resources Data for New York, Water Year 2001. Volume 3. Western New York AN - 19583631; 7295027 AB - Water resources data for the 2001 water year for New York consist of records of stage, discharge, and water quality of streams; stage and contents of lakes and reservoirs; water levels and water quality of ground-water wells; and quantity and chemical quality of precipitation. This volume contains records for water discharge at 69 gaging stations; stage only at 15 gaging station; stage and contents at 6 gaging stations; water quality at 7 gaging stations, 26 wells, and 68 partial record station; water levels at 19 observation wells; daily precipitation totals at 2 sites, and chemical quality of precipitation at 2 sites. Also included are data from 41 crest-stage partial record stations. Locations of these sites are shown on figure 1. Additional water data were collected at various sites not involved in the systematic data collection program and are published as miscellaneous measurements. These data together with the data in Volumes 1 and 2 represent that part of the National Water Data System operated by the U.S. Geological Survey and cooperating State, local, and Federal agencies in New York. JF - Water Data Report. United States Geological Survey AU - Hornlein, J F AU - Szabo, C O AU - Sherwood, DA AU - McInnes, S K Y1 - 2002///0, PY - 2002 DA - 0, 2002 SP - 382 PB - United States Geological Survey KW - ASFA 2: Ocean Technology Policy & Non-Living Resources; Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts; Pollution Abstracts; Water Resources Abstracts KW - USGS-WDR-NY-01-3 KW - New York KW - Hydrologic data KW - Surface waters KW - Ground water KW - Water quality KW - Flow rates KW - Stream flow KW - Gaging stations KW - Lakes KW - Reservoirs KW - Chemical analysis KW - Sediments KW - Water analysis KW - Water temperature KW - Water levels KW - Water wells KW - Data collection KW - Water chemistry KW - Discharge(Water) KW - Tables(Data) KW - water quality KW - Water resources data KW - Water reservoirs KW - Gaging Stations KW - Data reports KW - geological surveys KW - Water resources KW - Water Resources Data KW - Stages KW - Freshwater KW - Streams KW - Observation Wells KW - Daily precipitation KW - Discharge Measurement KW - Water Quality KW - River discharge KW - Water Level KW - Precipitation KW - Data collections KW - USA, New York KW - water levels KW - Geological surveys KW - Governments KW - Groundwater KW - SW 5010:Network design KW - P 2000:FRESHWATER POLLUTION KW - M2 556.18:Water Management (556.18) KW - Q2 09261:General UR - http://libproxy.lib.unc.edu/login?url=http://search.proquest.com/docview/19583631?accountid=14244 L2 - http://vb3lk7eb4t.search.serialssolutions.com/?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&rfr_id=info:sid/Pollution+Abstracts&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=report&rft.jtitle=&rft.atitle=&rft.au=Hornlein%2C+J+F%3BSzabo%2C+C+O%3BSherwood%2C+DA%3BMcInnes%2C+S+K&rft.aulast=Hornlein&rft.aufirst=J&rft.date=2002-01-01&rft.volume=&rft.issue=&rft.spage=382&rft.isbn=&rft.btitle=Water+Resources+Data+for+New+York%2C+Water+Year+2001.+Volume+3.+Western+New+York&rft.title=Water+Resources+Data+for+New+York%2C+Water+Year+2001.+Volume+3.+Western+New+York&rft.issn=&rft_id=info:doi/ LA - English DB - ProQuest Environmental Science Collection N1 - Date revised - 2007-04-01 N1 - SuppNotes - Product reproduced from digital image. Order this product from NTIS by: phone at 1-800-553-NTIS (U.S. customers); (703)605-6000 (other countries); fax at (703)605-6900; e-mail: orders[at]ntis.gov. NTIS Prices: PC A18/MF A03 N1 - Last updated - 2016-05-27 ER - TY - RPRT T1 - Water Resources Data for Arkansas, Water Year 2002 AN - 19583622; 7295071 AB - The Water Resources Discipline of the U.S. Geological Survey, in cooperation with local, State, and other Federal agencies, obtains a large amount of data pertaining to the water resources of Arkansas each water year (October 1 through September 30). These data, accumulated during many water years, constitute a valuable database for developing an improved understanding of the water resources of the State. To make these data readily available to interested parties outside the U.S. Geological Survey, these data are published annually in this report series entitled 'Water Resources Data-Arkansas' and are stored in the U.S. Geological Survey National Water Information System (NWIS) and U.S. Environmental Protection Agency STORET databases. Water resources data reported for the 2002 water year for Arkansas consist of records of discharge and water quality (physical measurements and chemical concentrations) of streams, water quality of lakes, and groundwater levels and ground-water quality. Data from selected sites in Missouri and Oklahoma also are included. This report contains daily discharge records for 108 surface-water gaging stations and 87 partial-record stations; water-quality data for 65 surface-water stations and 5 wells, and water levels for 15 observation wells. Additional water data were collected at various sites, not part of the systematic data-collection program, and are published as miscellaneous measurements. JF - Water Data Report. United States Geological Survey Y1 - 2002///0, PY - 2002 DA - 0, 2002 SP - 465 PB - United States Geological Survey KW - ASFA 2: Ocean Technology Policy & Non-Living Resources; Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts; Pollution Abstracts; Water Resources Abstracts KW - USGS-WDR-AR-02-1 KW - Arkansas KW - Hydrologic data KW - Surface water KW - Ground water KW - Water quality KW - Flow rates KW - Gaging stations KW - Lakes KW - Chemical analysis KW - Sediments KW - Water temperatures KW - Sampling sites KW - Water levels KW - Water analysis KW - water quality KW - Water resources data KW - Data reports KW - geological surveys KW - Water resources KW - Water Resources Data KW - Geological Surveys KW - Freshwater KW - Groundwater Level KW - Streams KW - Groundwater levels KW - USA, Oklahoma KW - Observation Wells KW - USA, Missouri KW - Water Quality KW - River discharge KW - Environmental protection KW - Databases KW - EPA KW - water levels KW - Geological surveys KW - Water wells KW - USA, Arkansas KW - Governments KW - Stream Discharge KW - Groundwater KW - Resource development KW - Water Resources KW - Information systems KW - P 2000:FRESHWATER POLLUTION KW - SW 3020:Sources and fate of pollution KW - M2 556.18:Water Management (556.18) KW - Q2 09261:General UR - http://libproxy.lib.unc.edu/login?url=http://search.proquest.com/docview/19583622?accountid=14244 L2 - http://vb3lk7eb4t.search.serialssolutions.com/?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&rfr_id=info:sid/Pollution+Abstracts&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=report&rft.jtitle=&rft.atitle=&rft.au=&rft.aulast=&rft.aufirst=&rft.date=2002-01-01&rft.volume=&rft.issue=&rft.spage=465&rft.isbn=&rft.btitle=Water+Resources+Data+for+Arkansas%2C+Water+Year+2002&rft.title=Water+Resources+Data+for+Arkansas%2C+Water+Year+2002&rft.issn=&rft_id=info:doi/ LA - English DB - ProQuest Environmental Science Collection N1 - Date revised - 2007-04-01 N1 - SuppNotes - Product reproduced from digital image. Order this product from NTIS by: phone at 1-800-553-NTIS (U.S. customers); (703)605-6000 (other countries); fax at (703)605-6900; e-mail: orders[at]ntis.gov. NTIS Prices: PC A21/MF A04; See also report for 2003, PB2005-102913. N1 - Last updated - 2016-05-27 ER - TY - RPRT T1 - Water Resources Data North Carolina Water Year 2001. Volume 2. Ground-Water Records AN - 19583613; 7295048 AB - Water-quality data for the 2001 water year for North Carolina consist of records of ground-water levels and water quality of ground water; records of stage, discharge, and water quality of streams; and stage and contents of lakes and reservoirs. This report contains ground-water level data from 136 observation wells and ground-water-quality data from 68 wells. The collection of water-resources data in North Carolina is a part of the National Water-Data System operated by the U.S. Geological Survey in cooperation with State, municipal, and Federal agencies. JF - Water Data Report. United States Geological Survey AU - Howe, S S AU - Breton, P L AU - Chapman, MJ Y1 - 2002///0, PY - 2002 DA - 0, 2002 SP - 298 PB - United States Geological Survey KW - Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts; Pollution Abstracts; Water Resources Abstracts KW - USGS-WDR-NC-01-2 KW - North Carolina KW - Ground water KW - Hydrologic data KW - Hydrology KW - Water quality KW - Discharge(Water) KW - Streams KW - Lakes KW - Reservoirs KW - Chemical analysis KW - Water temperature KW - Sampling sites KW - Water levels KW - Water analysis KW - Water wells KW - Tables(Data) KW - USA, North Carolina KW - water quality KW - Water resources data KW - geological surveys KW - Water Quality KW - Water resources KW - Water Resources Data KW - Stages KW - Geological Surveys KW - Observation Wells KW - Groundwater KW - Hydrologic Data KW - P 2000:FRESHWATER POLLUTION KW - SW 3020:Sources and fate of pollution KW - M2 556.18:Water Management (556.18) UR - http://libproxy.lib.unc.edu/login?url=http://search.proquest.com/docview/19583613?accountid=14244 L2 - http://vb3lk7eb4t.search.serialssolutions.com/?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&rfr_id=info:sid/Pollution+Abstracts&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=report&rft.jtitle=&rft.atitle=&rft.au=Howe%2C+S+S%3BBreton%2C+P+L%3BChapman%2C+MJ&rft.aulast=Howe&rft.aufirst=S&rft.date=2002-01-01&rft.volume=&rft.issue=&rft.spage=298&rft.isbn=&rft.btitle=Water+Resources+Data+North+Carolina+Water+Year+2001.+Volume+2.+Ground-Water+Records&rft.title=Water+Resources+Data+North+Carolina+Water+Year+2001.+Volume+2.+Ground-Water+Records&rft.issn=&rft_id=info:doi/ LA - English DB - ProQuest Environmental Science Collection N1 - Date revised - 2007-04-01 N1 - SuppNotes - Product reproduced from digital image. Order this product from NTIS by: phone at 1-800-553-NTIS (U.S. customers); (703)605-6000 (other countries); fax at (703)605-6900; e-mail: orders[at]ntis.gov. NTIS Prices: PC A14/MF A03; Prepared in cooperation with North Carolina Dept. of Environment and Natural Resources, Raleigh. N1 - Last updated - 2016-05-27 ER - TY - RPRT T1 - Water Resources Data for Wyoming, Water Year 2001. Volume 1. Surface Water AN - 19583607; 7295052 AB - Water resources data for the 2001 water year for Wyoming consists of records of stage, discharge and water quality of streams; stage and contents of lakes and reservoirs, and water levels and water quality of ground water. Volume 1 of this report contains discharge records for 151 gaging stations, stage and contents for 12 lakes and reservoirs, and water quality for 33 gaging stations and 32 ungaged stations. Additional water data were collected at various sites, not part of the systematic data collection program, and are published as miscellaneous measurements. These data together with the data in Volume 2 represent part of the National Water Data System operated by the U.S. Geological Survey and cooperating State and Federal agencies in Wyoming. JF - Water Data Report. United States Geological Survey AU - Swanson, R B AU - Woodruff, R E AU - Laidlaw, G A AU - Watson, K R AU - Clark, M L Y1 - 2002///0, PY - 2002 DA - 0, 2002 SP - 592 PB - United States Geological Survey KW - ASFA 2: Ocean Technology Policy & Non-Living Resources; Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts; Pollution Abstracts; Water Resources Abstracts KW - USGS-WDR-WY-01-1 KW - Surface waters KW - Hydrology KW - Wyoming KW - Water resources KW - Hydrologic data KW - Discharge(Water) KW - Gaging stations KW - Water quality KW - Flow rates KW - Water levels KW - Stage discharge relations KW - Lakes KW - Rivers KW - River basins KW - Missouri River KW - Colorado River KW - Bear River KW - Snake River KW - Reservoirs KW - Water temperature KW - Water chemistry KW - Tables(Data) KW - water quality KW - Water resources data KW - Water reservoirs KW - Surface water KW - Gaging Stations KW - Data reports KW - geological surveys KW - Water Resources Data KW - Stages KW - Freshwater KW - Streams KW - Discharge Measurement KW - Data collection KW - USA, Wyoming KW - Water Quality KW - River discharge KW - Water Level KW - water levels KW - Geological surveys KW - Governments KW - Groundwater KW - SW 5010:Network design KW - P 2000:FRESHWATER POLLUTION KW - M2 556.18:Water Management (556.18) KW - Q2 09261:General UR - http://libproxy.lib.unc.edu/login?url=http://search.proquest.com/docview/19583607?accountid=14244 L2 - http://vb3lk7eb4t.search.serialssolutions.com/?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&rfr_id=info:sid/Pollution+Abstracts&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=report&rft.jtitle=&rft.atitle=&rft.au=Swanson%2C+R+B%3BWoodruff%2C+R+E%3BLaidlaw%2C+G+A%3BWatson%2C+K+R%3BClark%2C+M+L&rft.aulast=Swanson&rft.aufirst=R&rft.date=2002-01-01&rft.volume=&rft.issue=&rft.spage=592&rft.isbn=&rft.btitle=Water+Resources+Data+for+Wyoming%2C+Water+Year+2001.+Volume+1.+Surface+Water&rft.title=Water+Resources+Data+for+Wyoming%2C+Water+Year+2001.+Volume+1.+Surface+Water&rft.issn=&rft_id=info:doi/ LA - English DB - ProQuest Environmental Science Collection N1 - Date revised - 2007-04-01 N1 - SuppNotes - Also available on CD-ROM. Product reproduced from digital image. Order this product from NTIS by: phone at 1-800-553-NTIS (U.S. customers); (703)605-6000 (other countries); fax at (703)605- 6900; e-mail: orders[at]ntis.gov. NTIS Prices: PC A99/MF A06; See also PB2001-105575, Volume 1, Water Year 2000; and PB2002- 106757, Volume 2, Water Year 2001. N1 - Last updated - 2016-05-27 ER - TY - RPRT T1 - Water Resources Data, Florida Water Year 2001. Volume 4: Northwest Florida AN - 19583604; 7295005 AB - This volume of the annual hydrologic data report of Florida is one of a series of annual reports that document hydrologic data gathered from the U.S. Geological Survey's surface and ground- water data collection networks in each State, Puerto Rico, and the Trust Territories. These records of stream flow, ground-water levels, and quality of water provide the hydrologic information needed by State, local, and Federal agencies, and the private sector for developing and managing our Nation's land and water resources. Volume 4, Northwest Florida, contains records of continuous or daily discharge for 65 streams, periodic discharge for 1 stream, continuous or daily stage for 18 streams, periodic stage for 2 streams, peak stage or discharge for 0 streams, continuous or daily elevations for 1 lake, periodic elevations for 1 lake, continuous ground-water levels for 2 wells, periodic ground-water levels for 3 wells, and quality-of-water for 3 surface-water sites and 0 wells. These data represent the National Water Data System records collected by the U.S. Geological Survey and cooperating local, State, and Federal agencies in Florida. JF - Water Data Report. United States Geological Survey Y1 - 2002///0, PY - 2002 DA - 0, 2002 PB - United States Geological Survey KW - ASFA 2: Ocean Technology Policy & Non-Living Resources; Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts; Water Resources Abstracts KW - USGS-WDR-FL-01-04-CD KW - Hydrologic data KW - Surface water KW - Ground water KW - Water quality KW - Flow rate KW - Chemical analysis KW - Gauging stations KW - Lakes KW - Reservoirs KW - Sediments KW - Elevations KW - Samplings KW - Water temperatures KW - Water levels KW - Water wells KW - CD-ROM KW - Water Resources Division KW - Water resources data KW - USA, Florida KW - Data reports KW - Annual reports KW - River discharge KW - Water resources KW - Stages KW - Freshwater KW - Streams KW - Stream flow KW - Water management KW - Wells KW - Elevation KW - Governments KW - Stream Discharge KW - Groundwater KW - Resource development KW - Hydrologic Data KW - ASW, Greater Antilles, Puerto Rico KW - Data Collections KW - Q2 09127:General papers on resources KW - SW 0835:Streamflow and runoff KW - M2 556.18:Water Management (556.18) UR - http://libproxy.lib.unc.edu/login?url=http://search.proquest.com/docview/19583604?accountid=14244 L2 - http://vb3lk7eb4t.search.serialssolutions.com/?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&rfr_id=info:sid/Water+Resources+Abstracts&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=report&rft.jtitle=&rft.atitle=&rft.au=&rft.aulast=&rft.aufirst=&rft.date=2002-01-01&rft.volume=&rft.issue=&rft.spage=&rft.isbn=&rft.btitle=Water+Resources+Data%2C+Florida+Water+Year+2001.+Volume+4%3A+Northwest+Florida&rft.title=Water+Resources+Data%2C+Florida+Water+Year+2001.+Volume+4%3A+Northwest+Florida&rft.issn=&rft_id=info:doi/ LA - English DB - ProQuest Environmental Science Collection N1 - Date revised - 2007-04-01 N1 - SuppNotes - This product requires ADOBE Acrobat software. If your machine is configured to utilize autorun, and an html browser is installed, the CD-ROM should automatically open with the file 'index.html' with your default browser. If you have no browser installed or experience problems using the CD, open the readm.txt file for help. NTIS Prices: CD-ROM CP D01; Documentation is included and not sold separately, PB2003- 100409. Date of coverage is Oct 1, 2000 - September 30, 2001. N1 - Last updated - 2016-05-27 ER - TY - RPRT T1 - Water Resources Data for South Dakota, Water Year 2001 AN - 19583586; 7295039 AB - Water-resources data for the 2001 water year for South Dakota consists of records of stage, discharge, and water quality of streams; stage, contents, and water quality of lakes and reservoirs; precipitation; and water levels in wells. This report contains discharge records for 128 streamflow-gaging stations; stage and contents records for 10 lakes and reservoirs, stage for 12 streams and 2 lakes, water-quality records for 3 streamflow- gaging stations, 2 daily sediment stations, 3 wells, 9 ungaged stream sites, 5 lakes, 1 sewage lagoon, and 1 precipitation site; water levels for 7 wells; daily precipitation records at 4 sites; and 68 partial-record crest-stage gage sites. Additional water data were collected at various sites, not part of the systematic data-collection program, and are published as miscellaneous measurements and analyses. These data represent that part of the National Water Data System operated by the U.S. Geological Survey and cooperating State and Federal agencies in South Dakota. JF - Water Data Report. United States Geological Survey AU - Burr, MJ AU - Teller, R W AU - Neitzert, K M Y1 - 2002///0, PY - 2002 DA - 0, 2002 SP - 506 PB - United States Geological Survey KW - ASFA 2: Ocean Technology Policy & Non-Living Resources; Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts; Pollution Abstracts; Water Resources Abstracts KW - USGS-WDR-SD-01-1 KW - Surface waters KW - Ground water KW - Hydrology KW - South Dakota KW - Hydrologic data KW - Discharge(Water) KW - Gaging stations KW - Water quality KW - Flow rates KW - Water levels KW - Lakes KW - Reservoirs KW - Sediments KW - Water temperature KW - Water analysis KW - Water sampling KW - Chemical analysis KW - Water wells KW - Water chemistry KW - Tables(Data) KW - Precipitation KW - water quality KW - Water resources data KW - Water reservoirs KW - Data reports KW - geological surveys KW - Reservoir Sites KW - Water resources KW - Stages KW - Freshwater KW - Streams KW - Lagoons KW - Sewage disposal KW - Daily precipitation KW - USA, South Dakota KW - Sediment pollution KW - Water Quality KW - River discharge KW - Water Level KW - Gages KW - water levels KW - Geological surveys KW - Governments KW - Stream Discharge KW - SW 3040:Wastewater treatment processes KW - P 2000:FRESHWATER POLLUTION KW - M2 556.18:Water Management (556.18) KW - Q2 09261:General UR - http://libproxy.lib.unc.edu/login?url=http://search.proquest.com/docview/19583586?accountid=14244 L2 - http://vb3lk7eb4t.search.serialssolutions.com/?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&rfr_id=info:sid/Pollution+Abstracts&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=report&rft.jtitle=&rft.atitle=&rft.au=Burr%2C+MJ%3BTeller%2C+R+W%3BNeitzert%2C+K+M&rft.aulast=Burr&rft.aufirst=MJ&rft.date=2002-01-01&rft.volume=&rft.issue=&rft.spage=506&rft.isbn=&rft.btitle=Water+Resources+Data+for+South+Dakota%2C+Water+Year+2001&rft.title=Water+Resources+Data+for+South+Dakota%2C+Water+Year+2001&rft.issn=&rft_id=info:doi/ LA - English DB - ProQuest Environmental Science Collection N1 - Date revised - 2007-04-01 N1 - SuppNotes - Product reproduced from digital image. Order this product from NTIS by: phone at 1-800-553-NTIS (U.S. customers); (703)605-6000 (other countries); fax at (703)605-6900; e-mail: orders[at]ntis.gov. NTIS Prices: PC A23/MF A04; See also PB2001-104576. N1 - Last updated - 2016-05-27 ER - TY - RPRT T1 - Water Resources Data for Maryland and Delaware Water Year 2001. Volume 2: Ground-Water Data AN - 19583567; 7295051 AB - Water resources data for the 2001 water year for Maryland and Delaware consist of records of water levels and water quality of ground-water wells. This report (Volume 2. Ground-Water Data) contains water levels at 379 observation wells, discharge records for 5 springs, and water quality at 238 wells and 10 springs. Locations of ground-water level wells are shown on figures 5 and 6. Locations of groundwater- quality sites are shown on figure 7. The data in this report represent that part of the National Water Data System collected by the U.S. Geological Survey and cooperating State, local, and Federal agencies in Maryland and Delaware. JF - Water Data Report. United States Geological Survey AU - Smigaj, MJ AU - Saffer, R W AU - Pentz, R H AU - Marchand, E H Y1 - 2002///0, PY - 2002 DA - 0, 2002 SP - 716 PB - United States Geological Survey KW - Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts; Pollution Abstracts; Water Resources Abstracts KW - USGS-WDR-MD-DE-01-2 KW - Maryland KW - Delaware KW - Hydrology KW - Ground water KW - Discharge(Water) KW - Gaging stations KW - Water quality KW - Flow rates KW - Water levels KW - Water table KW - Water temperature KW - Water chemistry KW - water quality KW - Water resources data KW - Springs KW - geological surveys KW - Water Quality KW - Water resources KW - Water Resources Data KW - Water Level KW - Geological Surveys KW - Water Table KW - Observation Wells KW - water levels KW - Wells KW - Water wells KW - Water springs KW - Groundwater KW - USA, Maryland KW - USA, Delaware KW - P 2000:FRESHWATER POLLUTION KW - SW 3020:Sources and fate of pollution KW - M2 556.18:Water Management (556.18) UR - http://libproxy.lib.unc.edu/login?url=http://search.proquest.com/docview/19583567?accountid=14244 L2 - http://vb3lk7eb4t.search.serialssolutions.com/?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&rfr_id=info:sid/Pollution+Abstracts&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=report&rft.jtitle=&rft.atitle=&rft.au=Smigaj%2C+MJ%3BSaffer%2C+R+W%3BPentz%2C+R+H%3BMarchand%2C+E+H&rft.aulast=Smigaj&rft.aufirst=MJ&rft.date=2002-01-01&rft.volume=&rft.issue=&rft.spage=716&rft.isbn=&rft.btitle=Water+Resources+Data+for+Maryland+and+Delaware+Water+Year+2001.+Volume+2%3A+Ground-Water+Data&rft.title=Water+Resources+Data+for+Maryland+and+Delaware+Water+Year+2001.+Volume+2%3A+Ground-Water+Data&rft.issn=&rft_id=info:doi/ LA - English DB - ProQuest Environmental Science Collection N1 - Date revised - 2007-04-01 N1 - SuppNotes - Product reproduced from digital image. Order this product from NTIS by: phone at 1-800-553-NTIS (U.S. customers); (703)605-6000 (other countries); fax at (703)605-6900; e-mail: orders[at]ntis.gov. NTIS Prices: PC A99/MF A06; See also PB2002-106207 and PB2001-104244. N1 - Last updated - 2016-05-27 ER - TY - RPRT T1 - Water Resources Data for Mississippi, Water Year 2001 AN - 19583549; 7295029 AB - Water resources data for the 2001 water year for Mississippi consist of records of surface water and ground water in the State. Specifically, it contains: (1) Discharge records for 95 streamflow- gaging stations, stage records for 20 of these gaging stations, discharge records for 83 partial-record or miscellaneous streamflow stations, including 8 flood hydrograph partial-record stations, 70 crest-stage partial-record stations, and 5 special study and miscellaneous sites; (2) state only at 1 gaging station; (3) water-quality records for 8 streamflow-gaging stations, 0 partial-record or miscellaneous sites, 9 short-term study sites, and 27 wells; and (4) water-level records for 18 observation wells. Records obtained from water-resources investigations are also included in special sections of the report. These data represent that part of the National Water Data System operated by the U.S. Geological Survey, and cooperating local, State, and Federal Agencies in Mississippi. JF - Water Data Report. United States Geological Survey AU - Morris, F AU - Turnipseed, D P AU - Storm, J B Y1 - 2002///0, PY - 2002 DA - 0, 2002 SP - 272 PB - United States Geological Survey KW - ASFA 2: Ocean Technology Policy & Non-Living Resources; Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts; Pollution Abstracts; Water Resources Abstracts KW - USGS-WDR/MS-01-1 KW - Mississippi KW - Hydrologic data KW - Surface water KW - Ground water KW - Water quality KW - Discharge(Water) KW - Stream flow KW - Gaging flow KW - Water wells KW - Water levels KW - Flow rate KW - Chemical analysis KW - Water chemistry KW - Hydrology KW - water quality KW - Water resources data KW - Flood hydrographs KW - Gaging Stations KW - Data reports KW - geological surveys KW - Water resources KW - Water Resources Data KW - Geological Surveys KW - Stages KW - Freshwater KW - Flow rates KW - Observation Wells KW - Floods KW - Discharge Measurement KW - Flood Hydrographs KW - River discharge KW - Surface-groundwater Relations KW - Geological surveys KW - USA, Mississippi KW - Governments KW - Groundwater KW - P 2000:FRESHWATER POLLUTION KW - M2 556.18:Water Management (556.18) KW - SW 6010:Structures KW - Q2 09261:General UR - http://libproxy.lib.unc.edu/login?url=http://search.proquest.com/docview/19583549?accountid=14244 L2 - http://vb3lk7eb4t.search.serialssolutions.com/?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&rfr_id=info:sid/Pollution+Abstracts&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=report&rft.jtitle=&rft.atitle=&rft.au=Morris%2C+F%3BTurnipseed%2C+D+P%3BStorm%2C+J+B&rft.aulast=Morris&rft.aufirst=F&rft.date=2002-01-01&rft.volume=&rft.issue=&rft.spage=272&rft.isbn=&rft.btitle=Water+Resources+Data+for+Mississippi%2C+Water+Year+2001&rft.title=Water+Resources+Data+for+Mississippi%2C+Water+Year+2001&rft.issn=&rft_id=info:doi/ LA - English DB - ProQuest Environmental Science Collection N1 - Date revised - 2007-04-01 N1 - SuppNotes - Product reproduced from digital image. Order this product from NTIS by: phone at 1-800-553-NTIS (U.S. customers); (703)605-6000 (other countries); fax at (703)605-6900; e-mail: orders[at]ntis.gov. NTIS Prices: PC A13/MF A03 N1 - Last updated - 2016-05-27 ER - TY - RPRT T1 - Water Resources Data for Colorado, Water Year 2001. Volume 2. Colorado River Basin AN - 19583539; 7295020 AB - Water-resources data for Colorado for the 2001 water year consist of records of stage, discharge, and water quality of streams; stage, contents, and water-quality of lakes and reservoirs; meteorological data; and water levels and water quality of wells and springs. This report (Volumes 1 and 2) contains discharge records for 313 gaging stations, stage and contents of 16 lakes and reservoirs, discharge measurements for 1 partial-record low-flow station and 1 miscellaneous site, peak flow information for 22 crest-stage partial record stations; water- quality for 125 gaging stations and for 10 lakes and reservoirs, supplemental water-quality for 181 gaged sites; water-quality for 77 miscellaneous sites and 14 observation wells; water levels for 3 observation wells, and meteorological data for 55 sites. Three pertinent stations operated by bordering states also are included in this report. The records were collected and computed by the Water Resources Division of the U.S. Geological Survey under the direction of W.F. Horak, District Chief. These data represent that part of the National Water Data System collected by the U.S. Geological Survey and cooperating State and Federal agencies. JF - Water Data Report. United States Geological Survey AU - Crowfoot, R M AU - Boulger, R W AU - O'Neill, G B Y1 - 2002///0, PY - 2002 DA - 0, 2002 SP - 580 PB - United States Geological Survey KW - ASFA 2: Ocean Technology Policy & Non-Living Resources; Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts; Pollution Abstracts; Water Resources Abstracts KW - USGS-WDR-CO-01-2 KW - Colorado KW - Surface waters KW - Ground water KW - Hydrology KW - Hydrologic data KW - Discharge(Water) KW - Gaging stations KW - Water quality KW - Flow rates KW - Stage discharge relations KW - Lakes KW - Tables(Data) KW - Water chemistry KW - Rivers KW - River basins KW - Colorado River KW - Reservoirs KW - Water temperature KW - water quality KW - Meteorological data KW - Water resources data KW - Water reservoirs KW - Data reports KW - geological surveys KW - Reservoir Sites KW - Water resources KW - Stages KW - Geological Surveys KW - Freshwater KW - Streams KW - Water levels KW - Observation Wells KW - Water springs KW - Meteorology KW - Hydrologic Data KW - Discharge Measurement KW - USA, Arizona, Colorado R. basin KW - Water Quality KW - River discharge KW - USA, Colorado KW - water levels KW - Well water levels KW - Geological surveys KW - Water wells KW - Governments KW - P 2000:FRESHWATER POLLUTION KW - SW 3020:Sources and fate of pollution KW - M2 556.18:Water Management (556.18) KW - Q2 09261:General UR - http://libproxy.lib.unc.edu/login?url=http://search.proquest.com/docview/19583539?accountid=14244 L2 - http://vb3lk7eb4t.search.serialssolutions.com/?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&rfr_id=info:sid/Pollution+Abstracts&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=report&rft.jtitle=&rft.atitle=&rft.au=Crowfoot%2C+R+M%3BBoulger%2C+R+W%3BO%27Neill%2C+G+B&rft.aulast=Crowfoot&rft.aufirst=R&rft.date=2002-01-01&rft.volume=&rft.issue=&rft.spage=580&rft.isbn=&rft.btitle=Water+Resources+Data+for+Colorado%2C+Water+Year+2001.+Volume+2.+Colorado+River+Basin&rft.title=Water+Resources+Data+for+Colorado%2C+Water+Year+2001.+Volume+2.+Colorado+River+Basin&rft.issn=&rft_id=info:doi/ LA - English DB - ProQuest Environmental Science Collection N1 - Date revised - 2007-04-01 N1 - SuppNotes - Product reproduced from digital image. Order this product from NTIS by: phone at 1-800-553-NTIS (U.S. customers); (703)605-6000 (other countries); fax at (703)605-6900; e-mail: orders[at]ntis.gov. NTIS Prices: PC A99/MF A06 N1 - Last updated - 2016-05-27 ER - TY - RPRT T1 - Water Resources Data for Florida, Water Year 2002. Volume 2B: South Florida Ground Water AN - 19583167; 7295062 AB - Water resources data for 2002 water year in Florida consists of continuous or daily discharge for 392 streams, periodic discharge for 15 streams, continuous or daily stage for 191 streams, periodic stage for 13 stream, peak discharge for 33 streams, and peak stage for 33 streams, continuous or daily elevations for 14 lakes, periodic elevations for 49 lakes, continuous ground-water levels for 418 wells, periodic ground- water levels for 1287 wells, quality of water data for 116 surface- water sites, and 291 wells. The data for South Florida included continuous or daily discharge for 71 streams, continuous or daily stage for 49 streams, no peak stage discharge for streams, 1 continuous elevation for lake, continuous ground-water levels for 238 wells, periodic ground-water levels for 260 wells, water quality for 24 surface-water sites, and 159 wells. These data represent the National Water Data System records collected by the U.S. Geological Survey and cooperating local, State, and Federal agencies in Florida. JF - Water Data Report. United States Geological Survey AU - Prinos, S AU - Overton, K AU - Byrne, M Y1 - 2002///0, PY - 2002 DA - 0, 2002 SP - 638 PB - United States Geological Survey KW - Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts; Pollution Abstracts; Water Resources Abstracts KW - USGS-WDR/FL-02/2B KW - Water resources KW - Florida KW - Surface waters KW - Ground waters KW - Water quality KW - Flow rates KW - Water levels KW - Water analysis KW - Monitoring wells KW - Lakes KW - Reservoirs KW - Elevations KW - Discharges KW - Chemical analysis KW - Tables(Data) KW - Water temperatures KW - water quality KW - Water resources data KW - USA, Florida KW - Surface water KW - geological surveys KW - Water Resources Data KW - Stages KW - Streams KW - water levels KW - Wells KW - Elevation KW - Water wells KW - Stream Discharge KW - Groundwater KW - Hydrologic Data KW - P 2000:FRESHWATER POLLUTION KW - SW 3020:Sources and fate of pollution KW - M2 556.18:Water Management (556.18) UR - http://libproxy.lib.unc.edu/login?url=http://search.proquest.com/docview/19583167?accountid=14244 L2 - http://vb3lk7eb4t.search.serialssolutions.com/?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&rfr_id=info:sid/Pollution+Abstracts&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=report&rft.jtitle=&rft.atitle=&rft.au=Prinos%2C+S%3BOverton%2C+K%3BByrne%2C+M&rft.aulast=Prinos&rft.aufirst=S&rft.date=2002-01-01&rft.volume=&rft.issue=&rft.spage=638&rft.isbn=&rft.btitle=Water+Resources+Data+for+Florida%2C+Water+Year+2002.+Volume+2B%3A+South+Florida+Ground+Water&rft.title=Water+Resources+Data+for+Florida%2C+Water+Year+2002.+Volume+2B%3A+South+Florida+Ground+Water&rft.issn=&rft_id=info:doi/ LA - English DB - ProQuest Environmental Science Collection N1 - Date revised - 2007-04-01 N1 - SuppNotes - Product reproduced from digital image. Order this product from NTIS by: phone at 1-800-553-NTIS (U.S. customers); (703)605-6000 (other countries); fax at (703)605-6900; e-mail: orders[at]ntis.gov. NTIS Prices: PC A99/MF A06 N1 - Last updated - 2016-05-27 ER - TY - RPRT T1 - Water Resources Data for Texas, Water Year 2001. Volume 5. Guadalupe River Basin, Nueces River Basin, Rio Grande Basin, and Intervening Coastal Basins AN - 19583132; 7295038 AB - Water-resources data for the 2001 water year for Texas are presented in six volumes, and consist of records of stage, discharge, and water quality of streams and canals; stage; contents, and water-quality of lakes and reservoirs; and water levels and water quality of ground-water wells. Volume 5 contains records for water discharge at 77 gaging stations; stage only at 4 gaging stations; stage and contents at 5 lakes and reservoirs; water quality at 27 gaging stations; and data for 23 partial- record stations comprised of 3 flood-hydrograph, 8 low-flow, 4 crest-stage, and 3 miscellaneous stations. Also included are lists of discontinued surface-water discharge or stage-only stations and discontinued surface-water-quality stations. Additional water data were collected at various sites, not part of the systematic data- collection program, and are published as miscellaneous measurements. These data represent that part of the National Water Data System operated by the U.S. Geological Survey and cooperating Federal, State, and local agencies in Texas. Records for a few Pertinent stations in the bordering States also are included. JF - Water Data Report. United States Geological Survey AU - Gandara, S C Y1 - 2002///0, PY - 2002 DA - 0, 2002 SP - 382 PB - United States Geological Survey KW - ASFA 2: Ocean Technology Policy & Non-Living Resources; Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts; Pollution Abstracts; Water Resources Abstracts KW - USGS-WDR-TX-01-5 KW - Texas KW - Surface waters KW - Hydrology KW - Hydrologic data KW - Discharge(Water) KW - Gaging stations KW - Water quality KW - Flow rates KW - Stage discharge relations KW - Water chemistry KW - Water levels KW - Rivers KW - Coastal basins KW - USA, Texas, Guadalupe R. basin KW - water quality KW - River Basins KW - Water resources data KW - Water reservoirs KW - Surface water KW - Gaging Stations KW - Data reports KW - geological surveys KW - Basins KW - Water resources KW - Stages KW - Freshwater KW - Streams KW - ASW, USA, Texas KW - Reservoir water quality KW - Lakes KW - Discharge Measurement KW - Hydrologic Data KW - Reservoirs KW - Water Quality KW - River discharge KW - River basins KW - USA, Texas, Nueces R. KW - Canals KW - water levels KW - Geological surveys KW - Water wells KW - Governments KW - Groundwater KW - P 2000:FRESHWATER POLLUTION KW - SW 3020:Sources and fate of pollution KW - M2 556.18:Water Management (556.18) KW - Q2 09261:General UR - http://libproxy.lib.unc.edu/login?url=http://search.proquest.com/docview/19583132?accountid=14244 L2 - http://vb3lk7eb4t.search.serialssolutions.com/?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&rfr_id=info:sid/Pollution+Abstracts&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=report&rft.jtitle=&rft.atitle=&rft.au=Gandara%2C+S+C&rft.aulast=Gandara&rft.aufirst=S&rft.date=2002-01-01&rft.volume=&rft.issue=&rft.spage=382&rft.isbn=&rft.btitle=Water+Resources+Data+for+Texas%2C+Water+Year+2001.+Volume+5.+Guadalupe+River+Basin%2C+Nueces+River+Basin%2C+Rio+Grande+Basin%2C+and+Intervening+Coastal+Basins&rft.title=Water+Resources+Data+for+Texas%2C+Water+Year+2001.+Volume+5.+Guadalupe+River+Basin%2C+Nueces+River+Basin%2C+Rio+Grande+Basin%2C+and+Intervening+Coastal+Basins&rft.issn=&rft_id=info:doi/ LA - English DB - ProQuest Environmental Science Collection N1 - Date revised - 2007-04-01 N1 - SuppNotes - Product reproduced from digital image. Order this product from NTIS by: phone at 1-800-553-NTIS (U.S. customers); (703)605-6000 (other countries); fax at (703)605-6900; e-mail: orders[at]ntis.gov. NTIS Prices: PC A18/MF A03 N1 - Last updated - 2016-05-27 ER - TY - RPRT T1 - Water Resources Data for Texas, Water Year 2001. Volume 3. San Jacinto River Basin, Brazos River Basin, San Bernard River Basin, and Intervening Coastal Basins AN - 19583112; 7295036 AB - Water-resources data for the 2001 water year for Texas are presented in six volumes, and consist of records of stage, discharge, and water quality of streams and canals; stage, contents, and water quality of lakes and reservoirs; and water levels and water quality of ground-water wells. Volume 3 contains records for water discharge at 83 gaging stations; stage only at 8 gaging stations; stage and contents at 32 lakes and reservoirs; water quality at 27 gaging stations; and data for 46 partial- record stations comprised of 21 flood-hydrograph, 22 low-flow, and 3 miscellaneous stations. Also included are lists of discontinued surface-water discharge or stage-only stations and discontinued surface-water-quality stations. Additional water data were collected at various sites, not part of the systematic data- collection program, and are published as miscellaneous measurements. These data represent that part of the National Water Data System operated by the U.S. Geological Survey and cooperating Federal, State, and local agencies in Texas. Records for a few pertinent stations in the bordering States also are included. JF - Water Data Report. United States Geological Survey AU - Gandara, S C Y1 - 2002///0, PY - 2002 DA - 0, 2002 SP - 500 PB - United States Geological Survey KW - ASFA 2: Ocean Technology Policy & Non-Living Resources; Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts; Pollution Abstracts; Water Resources Abstracts KW - USGS-WDR-TX-01-3 KW - Texas KW - Surface waters KW - Hydrology KW - Hydrologic data KW - Discharge(Water) KW - Gaging stations KW - Water quality KW - Flow rates KW - Stage discharge relations KW - Tables(Data) KW - Water levels KW - Chemical analysis KW - USA, Texas, Brazos R. KW - water quality KW - River Basins KW - Water resources data KW - Water reservoirs KW - Surface water KW - Gaging Stations KW - Data reports KW - geological surveys KW - Basins KW - Water resources KW - Stages KW - Freshwater KW - Streams KW - ASW, USA, Texas KW - Reservoir water quality KW - Lakes KW - USA, Texas, San Jacinto R. KW - Discharge Measurement KW - Hydrologic Data KW - Reservoirs KW - Water Quality KW - River discharge KW - River basins KW - Canals KW - Coastal zone KW - water levels KW - Geological surveys KW - Water wells KW - Governments KW - Groundwater KW - P 2000:FRESHWATER POLLUTION KW - SW 3020:Sources and fate of pollution KW - M2 556.18:Water Management (556.18) KW - Q2 09261:General UR - http://libproxy.lib.unc.edu/login?url=http://search.proquest.com/docview/19583112?accountid=14244 L2 - http://vb3lk7eb4t.search.serialssolutions.com/?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&rfr_id=info:sid/Pollution+Abstracts&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=report&rft.jtitle=&rft.atitle=&rft.au=Gandara%2C+S+C&rft.aulast=Gandara&rft.aufirst=S&rft.date=2002-01-01&rft.volume=&rft.issue=&rft.spage=500&rft.isbn=&rft.btitle=Water+Resources+Data+for+Texas%2C+Water+Year+2001.+Volume+3.+San+Jacinto+River+Basin%2C+Brazos+River+Basin%2C+San+Bernard+River+Basin%2C+and+Intervening+Coastal+Basins&rft.title=Water+Resources+Data+for+Texas%2C+Water+Year+2001.+Volume+3.+San+Jacinto+River+Basin%2C+Brazos+River+Basin%2C+San+Bernard+River+Basin%2C+and+Intervening+Coastal+Basins&rft.issn=&rft_id=info:doi/ LA - English DB - ProQuest Environmental Science Collection N1 - Date revised - 2007-04-01 N1 - SuppNotes - Product reproduced from digital image. Order this product from NTIS by: phone at 1-800-553-NTIS (U.S. customers); (703)605-6000 (other countries); fax at (703)605-6900; e-mail: orders[at]ntis.gov. NTIS Prices: PC A22/MF A04 N1 - Last updated - 2016-05-27 ER - TY - RPRT T1 - Water Resources Data Utah, Water Year 2001 AN - 19583083; 7295011 AB - Water-resources data for the year 2001 water year for Utah consist of records of stage, discharge, and water quality of streams; stage and contents of lakes and reservoirs; and water levels and water quality of ground water. JF - Water Data Report. United States Geological Survey AU - Author Herbert, LR AU - Wilberg, DE AU - Tibbetts, J R Y1 - 2002///0, PY - 2002 DA - 0, 2002 SP - 488 PB - United States Geological Survey KW - ASFA 2: Ocean Technology Policy & Non-Living Resources; Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts; Pollution Abstracts; Water Resources Abstracts KW - USGS-WDR-UT-01-1 KW - Water resources KW - Hydrologic data KW - Water quality KW - Utah KW - Water year KW - Data collection KW - Surface water KW - Stages(Water) KW - Discharge(Water) KW - Streams KW - Lakes KW - Reservoirs KW - Groundwater KW - Gaging stations KW - Wells KW - Observation wells KW - Measurements KW - Hydrolgoic stations KW - water quality KW - Water resources data KW - Water reservoirs KW - Data reports KW - Water Resources Data KW - Stages KW - Freshwater KW - Water levels KW - Hydrologic Data KW - USA, Utah KW - Water Quality KW - River discharge KW - Water Level KW - Water Table KW - water levels KW - P 2000:FRESHWATER POLLUTION KW - SW 3020:Sources and fate of pollution KW - M2 556.18:Water Management (556.18) KW - Q2 09261:General UR - http://libproxy.lib.unc.edu/login?url=http://search.proquest.com/docview/19583083?accountid=14244 L2 - http://vb3lk7eb4t.search.serialssolutions.com/?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&rfr_id=info:sid/Pollution+Abstracts&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=report&rft.jtitle=&rft.atitle=&rft.au=Author+Herbert%2C+LR%3BWilberg%2C+DE%3BTibbetts%2C+J+R&rft.aulast=Author+Herbert&rft.aufirst=LR&rft.date=2002-01-01&rft.volume=&rft.issue=&rft.spage=488&rft.isbn=&rft.btitle=Water+Resources+Data+Utah%2C+Water+Year+2001&rft.title=Water+Resources+Data+Utah%2C+Water+Year+2001&rft.issn=&rft_id=info:doi/ LA - English DB - ProQuest Environmental Science Collection N1 - Date revised - 2007-04-01 N1 - SuppNotes - Product reproduced from digital image. Order this product from NTIS by: phone at 1-800-553-NTIS (U.S. customers); (703)605-6000 (other countries); fax at (703)605-6900; e-mail: orders[at]ntis.gov. NTIS Prices: PC A22/MF A04 N1 - Last updated - 2016-05-27 ER - TY - RPRT T1 - Water Resources Data for Florida, Water Year 2002. Volume 2A: South Florida Surface Water AN - 19582041; 7295061 AB - Water resources data for 2002 water year in Florida consists of continuous or daily discharge for 392 streams, periodic discharge for 15 streams, continuous or daily stage for 191 streams, periodic stage for 13 stream, peak discharge for 33 streams, and peak stage for 33 streams, continuous or daily elevations for 14 lakes, periodic elevations for 49 lakes, continuous ground-water levels for 418 wells, periodic ground- water levels for 1287 wells, quality of water data for 116 surface- water sites, The data for South Florida included continuous or daily discharge for 71 streams, continuous or daily stage for 49 streams, no peak stage discharge for streams, 1 continuous elevation for lake, continuous ground-water levels for 238 wells, periodic ground-water levels for 260 wells, water quality for 24 surface-water sites, and 159 wells. The data represent the National Water Data System records collected by the U.S. Geological Survey and cooperation with local, state, and federal agencies in Florida. and 291 wells. JF - Water Data Report. United States Geological Survey AU - Price, C AU - Woolverton, J AU - Overton, K Y1 - 2002///0, PY - 2002 DA - 0, 2002 SP - 368 PB - United States Geological Survey KW - ASFA 2: Ocean Technology Policy & Non-Living Resources; Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts; Pollution Abstracts; Water Resources Abstracts KW - USGS-WDR/FL-02/2A KW - Water resources KW - Florida KW - Surface waters KW - Ground waters KW - Water quality KW - Flow rates KW - Water levels KW - Water analysis KW - Monitoring wells KW - Lakes KW - Reservoirs KW - Elevations KW - Discharges KW - Chemical analysis KW - Tables(Data) KW - Water temperatures KW - water quality KW - Water resources data KW - USA, Florida KW - Surface water KW - Data reports KW - geological surveys KW - Water Resources Data KW - Stages KW - Freshwater KW - Streams KW - Hydrologic Data KW - River discharge KW - water levels KW - Wells KW - Elevation KW - Geological surveys KW - Water wells KW - Governments KW - Stream Discharge KW - Groundwater KW - P 2000:FRESHWATER POLLUTION KW - SW 3020:Sources and fate of pollution KW - M2 556.18:Water Management (556.18) KW - Q2 09261:General UR - http://libproxy.lib.unc.edu/login?url=http://search.proquest.com/docview/19582041?accountid=14244 L2 - http://vb3lk7eb4t.search.serialssolutions.com/?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&rfr_id=info:sid/Pollution+Abstracts&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=report&rft.jtitle=&rft.atitle=&rft.au=Price%2C+C%3BWoolverton%2C+J%3BOverton%2C+K&rft.aulast=Price&rft.aufirst=C&rft.date=2002-01-01&rft.volume=&rft.issue=&rft.spage=368&rft.isbn=&rft.btitle=Water+Resources+Data+for+Florida%2C+Water+Year+2002.+Volume+2A%3A+South+Florida+Surface+Water&rft.title=Water+Resources+Data+for+Florida%2C+Water+Year+2002.+Volume+2A%3A+South+Florida+Surface+Water&rft.issn=&rft_id=info:doi/ LA - English DB - ProQuest Environmental Science Collection N1 - Date revised - 2007-04-01 N1 - SuppNotes - Product reproduced from digital image. Order this product from NTIS by: phone at 1-800-553-NTIS (U.S. customers); (703)605-6000 (other countries); fax at (703)605-6900; e-mail: orders[at]ntis.gov. NTIS Prices: PC A17/MF A03 N1 - Last updated - 2016-05-27 ER - TY - RPRT T1 - Water Resources Data for Iowa, Water Year 2001. Volume 1. Surface Water-Mississippi River Basin AN - 19582009; 7295053 AB - Water resources data for Iowa for the 2001 water year consists of records of stage, discharge, and water quality of streams; stage, and/or contents of lakes and reservoirs; ground water levels and water quality of ground-water wells. This report volume contains discharge records for 94 gaging stations; stage or contents for 6 lakes and reservoirs and 7 streams; water quality for 1 stream-gaging station; sediment records for 11 stream-gaging stations; and precipitation record for 7 precipitation stations. Also included are data for 58 crest-stage partial record stations. JF - Water Data Report. United States Geological Survey AU - Nalley, G M AU - Gorman, J G AU - Goodrich, R D AU - Miller, V E AU - Turco, MJ Y1 - 2002///0, PY - 2002 DA - 0, 2002 SP - 406 PB - United States Geological Survey KW - ASFA 2: Ocean Technology Policy & Non-Living Resources; Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts; Pollution Abstracts; Water Resources Abstracts KW - USGS-WDR/IA-01-1 KW - Iowa KW - Hydrologic data KW - Surface waters KW - Ground waters KW - Water quality KW - Hydrology KW - Gaging stations KW - Water levels KW - Reservoirs KW - Water wells KW - Water chemistry KW - Water temperature KW - Tables(Data) KW - Lakes KW - Chemical analysis KW - Flow rate KW - Sediments KW - Sampling sites KW - Water analysis KW - water quality KW - Water resources data KW - Water reservoirs KW - Data reports KW - Water resources KW - Water Resources Data KW - Stages KW - Freshwater KW - Streams KW - Sediment pollution KW - Water Quality KW - River discharge KW - River basins KW - Precipitation KW - USA, Iowa KW - Stream Discharge KW - Groundwater KW - P 2000:FRESHWATER POLLUTION KW - SW 3020:Sources and fate of pollution KW - M2 556.18:Water Management (556.18) KW - Q2 09261:General UR - http://libproxy.lib.unc.edu/login?url=http://search.proquest.com/docview/19582009?accountid=14244 L2 - http://vb3lk7eb4t.search.serialssolutions.com/?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&rfr_id=info:sid/Pollution+Abstracts&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=report&rft.jtitle=&rft.atitle=&rft.au=Nalley%2C+G+M%3BGorman%2C+J+G%3BGoodrich%2C+R+D%3BMiller%2C+V+E%3BTurco%2C+MJ&rft.aulast=Nalley&rft.aufirst=G&rft.date=2002-01-01&rft.volume=&rft.issue=&rft.spage=406&rft.isbn=&rft.btitle=Water+Resources+Data+for+Iowa%2C+Water+Year+2001.+Volume+1.+Surface+Water-Mississippi+River+Basin&rft.title=Water+Resources+Data+for+Iowa%2C+Water+Year+2001.+Volume+1.+Surface+Water-Mississippi+River+Basin&rft.issn=&rft_id=info:doi/ LA - English DB - ProQuest Environmental Science Collection N1 - Date revised - 2007-04-01 N1 - SuppNotes - Product reproduced from digital image. Order this product from NTIS by: phone at 1-800-553-NTIS (U.S. customers); (703)605-6000 (other countries); fax at (703)605-6900; e-mail: orders[at]ntis.gov. NTIS Prices: PC A19/MF A04; See also PB2002-107283, Volume 2. N1 - Last updated - 2016-05-27 ER - TY - RPRT T1 - Water Resources Data for Minnesota, Water Year 2001 AN - 19581959; 7295025 AB - Water resources data for the 2001 water year for Minnesota consist of records of stage, discharge, and water quality of streams; stage of lakes and reservoirs; ground-water quality; and water quality in wells. This report contains discharge records for 100 stream-gaging stations; stage for 13 lakes and reservoirs water quality for 24 stream-gaging stations; peak flow data for 88 high-flow partial-record stations, and water levels for 4 groundwater observation wells. Additional water data were collected at various sites that are not part of the systematic data collection program, and are published as miscellaneous measurements. These data represent that part of the National Water Data System operated by the U.S. Geological Survey for cooperating State and Federal agencies in Minnesota. JF - Water Data Report. United States Geological Survey AU - Mitton, G B AU - Guttormson, K G AU - Stratton, G W AU - Wakeman, E S Y1 - 2002///0, PY - 2002 DA - 0, 2002 SP - 402 PB - United States Geological Survey KW - ASFA 2: Ocean Technology Policy & Non-Living Resources; Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts; Pollution Abstracts; Water Resources Abstracts KW - USGS-WDR/MN-01-1 KW - Minnesota KW - Surface waters KW - Ground water KW - Hydrologic data KW - Hydrology KW - Water quality KW - Flow rate KW - Gaging stations KW - Lakes KW - Chemical analysis KW - Sediments KW - Water temperatures KW - Sampling sites KW - Water levels KW - Water analysis KW - Data collection KW - Streams KW - water quality KW - Water resources data KW - Water reservoirs KW - Data reports KW - geological surveys KW - Water resources KW - Water Resources Data KW - Stages KW - Geological Surveys KW - Freshwater KW - Observation Wells KW - Reservoir water quality KW - Reservoirs KW - Groundwater flow KW - Water Quality KW - River discharge KW - Water Level KW - Data collections KW - USA, Minnesota KW - water levels KW - Geological surveys KW - Water wells KW - Governments KW - Groundwater KW - SW 5010:Network design KW - P 2000:FRESHWATER POLLUTION KW - M2 556.18:Water Management (556.18) KW - Q2 09261:General UR - http://libproxy.lib.unc.edu/login?url=http://search.proquest.com/docview/19581959?accountid=14244 L2 - http://vb3lk7eb4t.search.serialssolutions.com/?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&rfr_id=info:sid/Pollution+Abstracts&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=report&rft.jtitle=&rft.atitle=&rft.au=Mitton%2C+G+B%3BGuttormson%2C+K+G%3BStratton%2C+G+W%3BWakeman%2C+E+S&rft.aulast=Mitton&rft.aufirst=G&rft.date=2002-01-01&rft.volume=&rft.issue=&rft.spage=402&rft.isbn=&rft.btitle=Water+Resources+Data+for+Minnesota%2C+Water+Year+2001&rft.title=Water+Resources+Data+for+Minnesota%2C+Water+Year+2001&rft.issn=&rft_id=info:doi/ LA - English DB - ProQuest Environmental Science Collection N1 - Date revised - 2007-04-01 N1 - SuppNotes - Product reproduced from digital image. Order this product from NTIS by: phone at 1-800-553-NTIS (U.S. customers); (703)605-6000 (other countries); fax at (703)605-6900; e-mail: orders[at]ntis.gov. NTIS Prices: PC A19/MF A04; See also PB2002-106750. N1 - Last updated - 2016-05-27 ER - TY - RPRT T1 - Water Resources Data California, Water Year 2001. Volume 2. Pacific Slope Basins from Arroyo Grande to Oregon State Line except Central Valley AN - 19581926; 7295018 AB - Water-resources data for the 2001 water year for California consist of records of stage, discharge, and water quality of streams, stage and contents in lakes and reservoirs, and water levels and water quality in wells. Volume 2 contains discharge records for 128 gaging stations, stage and contents for 6 lakes and reservoirs, gage-height records for 8 stations, water quality for 43 streamflow-gaging stations and 2 partial-record stations, and precipitation data for 1 station. Also included are data for 1 low-flow partial-record station, and 8 miscellaneous-measurement stations. These data represent that part of the National Water Data System operated by the U.S. Geological Survey and cooperating State and Federal agencies in California. JF - Water Data Report. United States Geological Survey AU - Friebel, M F AU - Freeman, LA AU - Smithson, J R AU - Webster, MD AU - Anderson, S W AU - Pope, G L Y1 - 2002///0, PY - 2002 DA - 0, 2002 PB - United States Geological Survey KW - ASFA 2: Ocean Technology Policy & Non-Living Resources; Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts; Pollution Abstracts; Water Resources Abstracts KW - USGS-WDR-CA-01-2 KW - California KW - Water resources KW - Surface waters KW - Ground waters KW - Hydrologic data KW - Flow rates KW - Sampling sites KW - Gaging stations KW - Lakes KW - Reservoirs KW - Chemical analysis KW - Sediments KW - Water temperature KW - Water analysis KW - Hydrology KW - Water wells KW - Water levels KW - water quality KW - Precipitation data KW - Water resources data KW - Water reservoirs KW - arroyos KW - Data reports KW - geological surveys KW - Basins KW - Stages KW - Geological Surveys KW - Freshwater KW - Water quality KW - Streams KW - INE, USA, California KW - Hydrologic Data KW - Water Quality KW - River discharge KW - Precipitation KW - Arroyos KW - INE, USA, Oregon KW - water levels KW - Geological surveys KW - Governments KW - USA, California, Central Valley KW - P 2000:FRESHWATER POLLUTION KW - SW 3020:Sources and fate of pollution KW - M2 556.18:Water Management (556.18) KW - Q2 09261:General UR - http://libproxy.lib.unc.edu/login?url=http://search.proquest.com/docview/19581926?accountid=14244 L2 - http://vb3lk7eb4t.search.serialssolutions.com/?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&rfr_id=info:sid/Pollution+Abstracts&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=report&rft.jtitle=&rft.atitle=&rft.au=Friebel%2C+M+F%3BFreeman%2C+LA%3BSmithson%2C+J+R%3BWebster%2C+MD%3BAnderson%2C+S+W%3BPope%2C+G+L&rft.aulast=Friebel&rft.aufirst=M&rft.date=2002-01-01&rft.volume=&rft.issue=&rft.spage=&rft.isbn=&rft.btitle=Water+Resources+Data+California%2C+Water+Year+2001.+Volume+2.+Pacific+Slope+Basins+from+Arroyo+Grande+to+Oregon+State+Line+except+Central+Valley&rft.title=Water+Resources+Data+California%2C+Water+Year+2001.+Volume+2.+Pacific+Slope+Basins+from+Arroyo+Grande+to+Oregon+State+Line+except+Central+Valley&rft.issn=&rft_id=info:doi/ LA - English DB - ProQuest Environmental Science Collection N1 - Date revised - 2007-04-01 N1 - SuppNotes - Available on CD-ROM and in paper copy only. Order this product from NTIS by: phone at 1-800-553-NTIS (U.S. customers); (703)605- 6000 (other countries); fax at (703)605-6900; e-mail: orders[at]ntis.gov. NTIS Prices: AV A21; This document is color dependent and/or in landscape layout. It is currently only available on CD-ROM. N1 - Last updated - 2016-05-27 ER - TY - RPRT T1 - Water Resources Data for New Mexico, Water Year 2002 AN - 19581883; 7295066 AB - Water-resources data for the 2002 water year for New Mexico consist of records of discharge and water quality of streams; stage, contents, and water quality of lakes and reservoirs; and water levels and water quality in wells and springs. This report contains discharge records for 176 gaging stations; stage and contents for 24 lakes and reservoirs; water quality for 42 gaging stations, 108 wells, and 9 partial-record stations and miscellaneous sites; and water levels at 135 observation wells. Also included are 80 creststage, partial-record stations. Additional water data were collected at various sites not involved in the systematic data-collection program and are published as miscellaneous measurements. Two seepage investigations were made during the year. These data represent that part of the National Water Data System collected by the U.S. Geological Survey and cooperating Federal, State, and local agencies in New Mexico. JF - Water Data Report. United States Geological Survey AU - Byrd, D AU - Lange, K AU - Beal, L Y1 - 2002///0, PY - 2002 DA - 0, 2002 SP - 472 PB - United States Geological Survey KW - ASFA 2: Ocean Technology Policy & Non-Living Resources; Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts; Pollution Abstracts; Water Resources Abstracts KW - USGS-WDR/NM-02-1 KW - New Mexico KW - Water sources KW - Hydrology KW - Surface water KW - Ground water KW - Water quality KW - Lakes KW - Reservoirs KW - Streams KW - Sediments KW - Water levels KW - Hydrologic data KW - Flow rates KW - Gaging stations KW - Chemical analysis KW - Water analysis KW - Water temperature KW - Sampling sites KW - water quality KW - Water resources data KW - Water reservoirs KW - Springs KW - Gaging Stations KW - Data reports KW - geological surveys KW - Water resources KW - Stages KW - Geological Surveys KW - Freshwater KW - Reservoir water quality KW - Water springs KW - Seepages KW - Discharge Measurement KW - USA, New Mexico KW - Water Quality KW - River discharge KW - Water Level KW - water levels KW - Geological surveys KW - Water wells KW - seepages KW - Governments KW - P 2000:FRESHWATER POLLUTION KW - SW 3020:Sources and fate of pollution KW - M2 556.18:Water Management (556.18) KW - Q2 09261:General UR - http://libproxy.lib.unc.edu/login?url=http://search.proquest.com/docview/19581883?accountid=14244 L2 - http://vb3lk7eb4t.search.serialssolutions.com/?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&rfr_id=info:sid/Pollution+Abstracts&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=report&rft.jtitle=&rft.atitle=&rft.au=Byrd%2C+D%3BLange%2C+K%3BBeal%2C+L&rft.aulast=Byrd&rft.aufirst=D&rft.date=2002-01-01&rft.volume=&rft.issue=&rft.spage=472&rft.isbn=&rft.btitle=Water+Resources+Data+for+New+Mexico%2C+Water+Year+2002&rft.title=Water+Resources+Data+for+New+Mexico%2C+Water+Year+2002&rft.issn=&rft_id=info:doi/ LA - English DB - ProQuest Environmental Science Collection N1 - Date revised - 2007-04-01 N1 - SuppNotes - Product reproduced from digital image. Order this product from NTIS by: phone at 1-800-553-NTIS (