« up

159 U.S. 415

16 S.Ct. 53

40 L.Ed. 202

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA ex rel. BRYANT
v.
HOLLADAY et al.

No. 566.

November 11, 1895.

[Syllabus from pages 415-417 intentionally omitted]

Wm. Matthews and Wm. Craig, for plaintiff in error.

S. W. Holladay and E. Burke Holladay, for defendants in error.

Mr. Chief Justice FULLER.

1

The opinions of the supreme court of California in this case are reported 68 Cal. 439, 9 Pac. 655; 93 Cal. 241, 29 Pac. 54; 102 Cal. 661, 36 Pac. 927. The motion to dismiss is sustained on the authority of San Francisco v. Itsell, 133 U. S. 65, 10 Sup. Ct. 241; Beatty v. Benton, 135 U. S. 244, 10 Sup. Ct. 747; Eustis v. Bolles, 150 U. S. 361, 14 Sup. Ct. 131, and cases cited. And see Hoadley v. San Francisco, 94 U. S. 4; Hoadley's Adm'r v. San Francisco, 124 U. S. 639, 8 Sup. Ct. 659.

2

Writ of error dismissed.