159 U.S. 415
16 S.Ct. 53
40 L.Ed. 202
PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA ex rel. BRYANT
v.
HOLLADAY et al.
No. 566.
November 11, 1895.
[Syllabus from pages 415-417 intentionally omitted]
Wm. Matthews and Wm. Craig, for plaintiff in error.
S. W. Holladay and E. Burke Holladay, for defendants in error.
Mr. Chief Justice FULLER.
The opinions of the supreme court of California in this case are reported 68 Cal. 439, 9 Pac. 655; 93 Cal. 241, 29 Pac. 54; 102 Cal. 661, 36 Pac. 927. The motion to dismiss is sustained on the authority of San Francisco v. Itsell, 133 U. S. 65, 10 Sup. Ct. 241; Beatty v. Benton, 135 U. S. 244, 10 Sup. Ct. 747; Eustis v. Bolles, 150 U. S. 361, 14 Sup. Ct. 131, and cases cited. And see Hoadley v. San Francisco, 94 U. S. 4; Hoadley's Adm'r v. San Francisco, 124 U. S. 639, 8 Sup. Ct. 659.
Writ of error dismissed.