PICTET ARTIFICIAL ICE Co. v. NEW YORK ICE MACHINE Co.

Circuit Court, S. D. New York.

June 8, 1882.

PRACTICE—DISCONTINUANCE—DISMISSAL.

Consent and order for discontinuance are, in effect, a dismissal of the bill.

WALLACE, C. J. The consent and order for a discontinuance are, in effect, a dismissal of the bill. The complainant has the right to dismiss, with costs to the defendant, at the present stage of the case, as of course. I suggest, however, that a formal rule “dismissing” the bill be entered by complainant.

This volume of American Law was transcribed for use on the Internet
through a contribution from Nolo.