Case No. 11,655.

REELER v. ROBINSON.

[2 Cranch, C. C. 220.]¹

Circuit Court, District of Columbia.

Nov. Term, 1820.

SLAVERY—IMPORTING INTO STATE—OATH—PRESUMPTION.

The lapse of nine years since the plaintiff arrived at the age of twenty one years, does not create a presumption that the oath was taken by the person who brought the plaintiff into Virginia.

This was a suit in Alexandria for freedom, grounded upon an importation, twenty four years ago, from Maryland, without the importers taking the oath required by the Virginia law.

Mr. Taylor, for defendant, contended that from the lapse of time, a presumption arises that the oath was taken. The law did not require that the oath should be reduced to writing, nor certified, nor recorded.

Mr. Hewitt, for plaintiff, contra: The plaintiff was only six years old when imported. No presumption could begin to arise against him until he was of full age, and able to sue in his own name and right Deduct fifteen years from the twenty four, and there remain only nine years, in which he has been competent to sue for his freedom. This neglect or forbearance to assert his right is no bar to his title.

Mr. Taylor, in reply: The act of Virginia authorizes infants to sue by a justice of the peace, who upon complaint made, is bound to sue. There has been no actual disability since he came to years of discretion.

THE COURT (THRUSTON, Circuit Judge, absent) decided that the presumption did not arise under those circumstances.

¹ [Reported by Hon. William Cranch, Chief Judge.]

This volume of American Law was transcribed for use on the Internet
through a contribution from Google.