Case No. 5,475.

In re GLASER.

[1 N. B. R. 241 (Quarto, 18).]¹

District Court, S. D. New York.

Jan. 14, 1868.

AFFIDAVIT TO STAY PROCEEDINGS IN STATE COURTS.

In bankruptcy.

“Siegmund Spingarn being duly sworn says, he is one of the copartners of the firm of Morrison, Lauterbaeh & Spingarn, attorneys at law. That Henry Morrison, one of the said firm, is the attorney of record of the said Louis Glaser, the petitioner for adjudication of bankruptcy. That the petition of said Louis Glaser was filed on the 13th day of January, 186S, by this deponent That before the filing of said petition, several creditors of the said Louis Glaser commenced actions for the recovery of money due and owing to them from said Louis Glaser. That on the 9th day of January, 180S, one L. H. Mandlebaum commenced an action in the Second district court of the city of New York, which action is now at issue and placed for trial. That on the same day a creditor named James Cohen commenced an action in the same court against the said Louis Glaser, the summons in which case is returnable on the 15th day of January, 1868. That on the same day George C. Eyland commenced an action in the marine court of the city of New York, against the said Louis Glaser, which action is now pending. That on the same day the firm of A. Altmayer & Co. commenced an action in the same court, to wit the marine court in which action the summons is returnable January 17, 1868. That on the 10th day of January, 1868, Isaac Van Deusen, John Van Deusen, and Henry Boehmer commenced an action in the supreme court of the state of New York, against the said Louis Glaser. Deponent further says, that the petitioner, Louis Glaser, has no valid and legal defence to interpose in any of these cases, and that they will recover judgment unless restrained by order of this honorable court. Deponent further says, that all these actions are brought to recover debts due by the said petitioner, Louis Glaser, which are set out in the schedule attached to the petition for adjudication of bankruptcy. That they are all debts provable under the act of congress passed March 2, 1867 [14 Stat. 517], and from which the petitioner may be discharged in bankruptcy. Sieg. Spingarn.

“Sworn to before me, this 14th day of January, 1868. R. E. Stilwell, U. S. Commissioner.”

[See Case No. 5,474.]

¹ [Reprinted by permission.]

This volume of American Law was transcribed for use on the Internet
through a contribution from Google.