Case No. 1,036.

BARNUM v. GOODRICH.

Circuit Court, N. D. Illinois.

July 2, 1873.

[Cited in Allis v. Stowell, 16 Fed. 788, and in Birdsell v. Hagerstown Agr. Imp. Manuf'g Co., Case No. 1,437, to the point that, to prevent a multiplicity of suits, the court may require the prosecution of suits between the patentee and the mere user of a patented machine to be suspended, and await the result of a suit pending between the patentee and the principal infringer, from whom the user purchased the machine.]

[In equity. Bill by Isaac W. Barnum against Herman B. Goodrich for infringement of a patent and for an accounting. Upon defendant's application, plaintiff was enjoined from prosecuting suits commenced, and from commencing new suits, against defendant's vendors, for other infringements, pending final disposition of the case at bar.]

[NOTE. Nowhere reported; opinion not now accessible.]

BARQUE.

[NOTE. Cases cited under this title will be found arranged in alphabetical order under the names of the barques; e. g. “The Barque Unadilla. See The Unadilla.” Cases Nos. 14,332 and 14,333.]

This volume of American Law was transcribed for use on the Internet
through a contribution from Google.