Case No. 442.

ANONYMOUS.

[1 Cranch, C. C. 139.]¹

Circuit Court, District of Columbia.

July Term, 1803.

EQUITY PRACTICE—ANSWER—ATTACHMENT.

THE COURT decided, on a motion of Mr. Woodward, for a rule answer in chancery, that such a rule need not be laid, but an attachment might go, of course, after the fourth day of next term.

¹ [Reported by Hon. William Cranch, Chief Judge.]

This volume of American Law was transcribed for use on the Internet
through a contribution from Google.