This library of books, audio, video, and other materials from and about India is curated and maintained by Public Resource. The purpose of this library is to assist the students and the lifelong learners of India in their pursuit of an education so that they may better their status and their opportunities and to secure for themselves and for others justice, social, economic and political.
This item has been posted for non-commercial purposes and facilitates fair dealing usage of academic and research materials for private use including research, for criticism and review of the work or of other works and reproduction by teachers and students in the course of instruction. Many of these materials are either unavailable or inaccessible in libraries in India, especially in some of the poorer states and this collection seeks to fill a major gap that exists in access to knowledge.
For other collections we curate and more information, please visit the Bharat Ek Khoj page. Jai Gyan!
IRC:SP:70-2005
Published by
THE INDIAN ROADS CONGRESS
Kama Koti Marg,
Sector 6, R.K. Puram,
2005
Price Rs. 160/-
(Plus Packing & Postage )
PERSONNEL OF THE BRIDGES SPECIFICATIONS AND STANDARDS COMMITTEE
(As on 20-12-2004)
1. | Velavutham, V. (Convenor) |
Addl. Director General, Ministry of Shipping, Road Transport & Highways, New Delhi |
2. | Sinha, V.K. (Co-Convenor) |
Chief Engineer, Ministry of Shipping, Road Transport & Highway, New Delhi |
3. |
Dhodapkar, A.N. Chief Engineer (B) S&R (Member-Secretary) | Ministry of Shipping, Road Transport & Highways, New Delhi |
Members | ||
4. | Agrawal, K.N. | C-33, Chandra Nagar, Ghaziabad-201 011 |
5. | Ahmed, S. | Secretary to the Govt. of Meghalaya PWD, Shillong |
6. | Alimchandani, C.R. | Chairman & Managing Director, STUP Consultants Ltd., Mumbai |
7. | Banerjee, A.K. | B-210, (SF), Chitranjan Park, New Delhi |
8. | Basa, Ashok | Director (Tech.) B. Engineers & Builders Ltd., Bhubaneswar |
9. | Bhasin, P.C. | ADG (B), MOST (Retd.) 324, Mandakini Enclave, New Delhi |
10. | Chakraborty, S.S. | Managing Director, Consulting Engg. Services (I) Pvt. Ltd., New Delhi |
11. | Gupta, K.K. | House No. 1149, Sector 19, Faridabad |
12. | Jambekar, A.R. | Chief Engineer & General Manager (Tech.) CIDCO, NAVI Mumbai |
13. | Jain, S.K. | Director & Head, Civil Engg. Department, Bureau of Indian Standards, New Delhi |
14. | Kaushik, S.K. | Chairman, Estate & Works & Coordinator (TIFAC-CORE) IIT, Roorkee |
15. | Kand, C.V. | Consultant, Bhopal |
16. | Koshi, Ninan | DG (RD) & Addl. Secy., MOST (Retd.), H-54, Residency Green, Gurgaon |
17. | Kumar, Prafulla | DG (RD) & AS, MORT&H (Retd.) D-86, Sector-56, Noida |
18. | Manjure, P.Y. | Director, Freyssinet Prestressed Concrete Co. Ltd., Mumbai |
19. | Merani, N.V. | Principal Secy., Maharashtra PWD (Retd.), Mumbai |
20. | Mukherjee, M.K. | 40/182, Chitranjan Park, New Delhi |
21. | Narain, A.D. | Director General (Road Dev.) & Addl. Secretary, MOST (Retd.) B-186, Sector-26, NOIDA |
22. | Puri, S.K. | Chief Engineer, Ministry of Shipping, Road Transport and Highways |
23. | Rajagopalan, N. | Chief Technical Advisor, L&T-Ramboll Consulting Engg. Ltd., Chennai |
24. | Rao, M.V.B. | A-181, Sarita Vihar, New Delhii |
25. | Rao, T.N. Subba, Dr. | Chairman, Construma Consultancy (P) Ltd., Mumbai |
26. | Reddi, S.A. | Dy. Managing Director, Gammon India Ltd., Mumbai |
27. | Sharan, G. | Member (T), National Highways Authority of India, New Delhi |
28. | Sinha, N.K. | DG (RD) & SS, MORT&H (Retd.) G-1365, Ground Floor, Chitranjan Park, New Delhi |
29. | Subramanian, R. | Engineer-in-Chief, PWD, New Delhi |
30. | Tambankar, M.G., Dr. | BH-1/44, Kendriya Vihar Kharghar, Navi Mumbai |
31. | Tandon, Mahesh | Managing Director, Tandon Consultants (P) Ltd., New Delhi |
32. | Vijay, P.B. | A-39/B, DDA Flats, Munirka, New Delhi |
33. | Director | Highway Research Station, Chennai |
34. | Chief Engineer (NH) Planning & Budget | (Shri S.K. De) M.P. PWD, Bhopal |
35. | Addl. Director General | HQ DGBR, Seema Sadak Bhavan, New Delhi |
36. | Chief Engineer (NH) | U.P. PWD, Lucknow |
37. | Chief Engineer (NH) | Chepauk, Chennai |
38. | Rep. of RDSO | (R.K. Gupta) Executive Director (B&S) Bidges & Structures Directt., RDSO, Lucknow |
Ex-Officio Members | ||
39. | President, IRC | (S.S. Momin), Secretary (R), Maharashtra PWD, Mumbai |
40. | Director General (Road Development) |
(Indu Prakash), Ministry of Shipping, Road Transport & Highways, New Delhi |
41. | Secretary, IRC | (R.S. Shamia), Indian Roads Congress, Kama Koti Marg, Sector 6, R.K. Puram, New Delhi |
Corresponding Members | ||
1. | Agarwal, M.K. | Engineer-in-Chief, Haryana PWD (Retd.), Panchkula |
2. | Bhagwagar, M.K. | Executive Director, Engg. Consultant Pvt. Ltd., New Delhi |
3. | Chakraborti, A. | Addl. Director General (TD), CPWD, New Delhi |
4. | Raina, V.K., Dr. | B-13, Sector-14, Noidaii |
GUIDELINES FOR THE USE OF HIGH PERFORMANCE CONCRETE IN BRIDGES
The Reinforced, Prestressed and Composite Concrete Committee (B-6) of the Indian Roads Congress was reconstituted in 2003 with the following personnel:
Ninan Koshi | ... | Convenor |
Addl. DGBR | ... | Co-Convenor |
T. Viswanathan | ... | Member-Secretary |
Members | ||
Banerjee, A.K. | ||
Bhowmick, Alok | ||
Dhodapkar, A.N. | ||
Gupta, Vinay | ||
Haridas, G.R. | ||
Joglekar, S.G. | ||
Kurian, Jose | ||
Limaye, S.D. | ||
Mukherjee, M.K. | ||
Mullick, Dr. A.K. | ||
Rajagopalan Dr. N. | ||
Saha, Dr. G.P. | ||
Sharma, R.S. | ||
Sinha, N.K. | ||
Thandavan, K.B. | ||
CE (B) S&R, MOSRT&H | ||
Ex-Officio Members | ||
President, IRC (S.S. Momin) |
||
DG(RD), MOSRT&H (Indu Prakash) |
||
Secretary, IRC (R.S. Sharma) |
||
Corresponding Members | ||
Basa, Ashok | ||
Kand, C.V. |
At its first meeting on 29th April, 2003, the Committee felt that in the light of the massive construction programme that was under execution in the highway sector, it was necessary to bring out guidelines on certain topics which were not adequately covered in the existing IRC Codes and Standards. The guideline for the use of High Performance Concrete was one of the two topics selected. It was decided that the guidlines would be generally in line with IRC: 18 and IRC:21 with additional inputs from BS:5400, EURO and AASHTO codes, wherever necessary.
The initial draft of the guidelines was prepared by Dr. A.K. Mullick. The draft was discussed by the B-6 Committee at several meetings and finalized in its meeting held on 3rd September, 2004. The draft document was approved by Bridges Specifications and Standards Committee in its meeting held on 2nd December, 2004 and by the Executive Committee on 18th December, 2004. The document was considered by IRC Council in its 173rd meeting held on 8th January, 2005 in Bangalore and approved with certain modifications. The required modifications were accordingly carried out by the Convenor B-6 Committee before sending the document for publication.
High Performance Concrete (HPC) can be used both in super and substructure of bridges. The guidelines provide broad aspects for production of HPC including mix design. The guidelines on HPC should be read in conjunction with relevant IS and IRC Specifications and Codes of practice, besides International Codes/ Guidelines on the same topic, to gain confidence on its usage.1
Concrete, whose ingredients, proportions and production methods are specifically chosen to meet special performance and uniformity requirements that cannot be always achieved routinely by using only conventional materials, like, cement, aggregates, water and chemical admixtures, and adopting normal mixing, placing and curing practices. These performance requirements can be high strength, high early strength, high workability, low permeability and high durability for severe service environments, etc. or combinations thereof. Production and use of such concrete in the field necessitates high degree of uniformity between batches and very stringent quality control.
Any of the types of cement as per Table 1 may be used with the approval of the competent authority.
Any of the following mineral admixtures may be used as part replacement of Ordinary Portland Cement with the approval of the competent authority. Uniform blending with cement should be ensured by having dedicated facility and complete mechanised process control at the site to achieve specified quality.
Conforming to Grade I of IS: 3812-3.The proportion should not be less than 20 per cent, nor should exceed 35 per cent by mass of cement.
Ground granulated slag obtained by grinding granulated slag conforming to IS: 12089. The proportion should not be less than 50 per cent, nor should exceed 70 per cent by mass of cement.
Silica fume is very fine, non-crystalline SiO2, obtained as a by-product of Silicon or Ferro-Silicon alloy industries. It should conform to IS: 15388.
Chemical admixtures and superplasticisers conforming to IS: 9103 may be used. Compatibility of the superplasticiser with the cement and any other pozzolanic or hydraulic additives as covered in Clause 4.2 being used,
S. No. | Type | Conforming to |
---|---|---|
1. | Ordinary Portland Cement 43 Grade | IS : 8112 |
2. | Ordinary Portland Cement 53 Grade | IS : 12269 |
3. | Rapid Hardening Portland Cement | IS : 8041 |
4. | Sulphate Resistant Portland Cement | IS : 12330 |
5. | Low Heat Portland Cement | IS : 12600 |
6. | Portland Pozzolana Cement | IS : 1489 - Part I |
7. | Portland Slag Cement | IS : 455 |
Notes : (i) Use of Portland Pozzolana Cement may be permitted only in plain concrete members.
(ii) Under severe condition of Sulphate Content in subsoil water, special literature on precautions to be taken with regard to the use of special types of cement with low C3A content may be referred to. Durability criteria, like, minimum cement content and maximum water cement ratio, etc. should also be given due consideration.2 |
should be ensured by trials, so that the following problems are avoided.
All coarse and fine aggregates shall conform to IS:383 and shall be tested as per IS:2386 Parts I to VIII.
Coarse aggregates shall consist of clean, hard, strong, dense, nonporous, equi-dimensional (i.e., not much flaky or elongated) and durable pieces of crushed stone, crushed gravel, natural gravel or a suitable combination thereof.
The maximum size of the coarse aggregate should not be greater than;
Fine aggregate shall consist of hard, strong, clean, durable particles of natural sand, crushed stone or crushed gravel. Suitable combinations of natural sand and crushed stone or crushed gravel can be permitted. They shall not contain dust, lumps, soft or flaky particles, mica or any other deleterious materials in such quantities as would reduce the strength or durability of concrete. Fine aggregate of Zone II or III of IS:383 are preferable.
Water should conform to provisions of Clause 302.4 of IRC:21-2000.
The concrete shall be in grades designated in Table 2, where the characteristic strength is defined as the strength of concrete below which not more than 5 per cent of test results are expected to fall.
Grade designation | Specified characteristic compressive strength at 28 days (MPa) |
---|---|
M 40 | 40 |
M 45 | 45 |
M 50 | 50 |
M 55 | 55 |
M 60 | 60 |
M 65 | 65 |
M 70 | 70 |
M 75 | 75 |
M 80 | 80 |
The Cement content of concrete, inclusive of any mineral admixtures, shall be not less than 380 kg/m3.
The Cement content excluding any mineral admixtures shall not exceed 450 kg/m3.
The water/(cement+all cementitious materials) ratio should generally not exceed 0.33, but in no case more than 0.40.
The concrete mix proportions chosen should be such that the concrete is of adequate workability for placing conditions and congestion of reinforcement, to ensure proper placement without segregation or honey combing, and thorough compaction.
Suggested ranges of workability of concrete measured in accordance with IS: 1199 are given below:3
Degree or Workability | Slump (mm) |
---|---|
Low | 25-50 |
Medium | 50 - 100 |
High | 100- 150 |
Very High | 150 - 200* |
Note* :In the ‘Very High’ category of workability, measurement of workability by determination of flow as per IS:9103 will be appropriate. |
Concrete should be durable to provide satisfactory performance in the anticipated exposure conditions during service. The materials and mix proportions specified and used, and the workmanship employed should be such as to maintain its integrity and to protect embedded metal from corrosion.
One of the main characteristics influencing the durability of concrete is its impermeability to the ingress of water, oxygen, carbon dioxide, chloride, sulphate and other potentially deleterious substances. Impermeability is governed by the constituents and workmanship employed in making the concrete. A suitably low permeability is achieved by having an adequate cement content, sufficiently low water-cement ratio, dense packing of fine particles, by ensuring thorough compaction of the concrete, and by timely and adequate curing.
Total water-soluble sulphate (SO3) content of the concrete mix, expressed as (S03) shall not exceed 4 per cent by mass of cement used in the mix.
Total chloride content in concrete, expressed as chloride-ion, shall not exceed the following values by mass of cement used:
Type | Amount (per cent) |
Prestressed concrete | 0.10 |
Reinforced concrete | |
(i) in severe condition of exposure | 0.20 |
(ii) in moderate condition of exposure | 0.30 |
Choice of materials, concrete mix design and field practices are quite critical, so that optimum performance can be extracted of each of the ingredients. The procedure of mix proportioning of normal grades of concrete may not be adequate. Relationships between the compressive strength of concrete and water-cement ratio (or water-cement+cementious materials ratio, when part of the cement is replaced by mineral admixtures) and between water content and workability will have to be established by laboratory trials for the grade of concrete, the materials to be used, and the water-reducing efficiency of the superplasticiser.
The target mean strength of the mix should be equal to be characteristic strength for the grade plus the current margin.
The current margin for a concrete mix shall be taken as 1.64 times the standard deviation of sample test results taken from at least 40 separate batches of concrete of nominally similar proportions produced at site by the same plant under similar supervision, over a period exceeding 5 days, but not exceeding 6 months.
Where there are insufficient data to satisfy the above, the target mean strength for the initial mix design shall be taken as given in Table
3. As soon as the results of samples are available, actual calculated standard deviation may be used and the mix designed accordingly.
Concrete Grade | Target Mean Strength (MPa) |
---|---|
M 40 | 52 |
M 45 | 58 |
M 50 | 63 |
M 55 | 69 |
M 60 | 74 |
M 65 | 80 |
M 70 | 85 |
M 75 | 90 |
M 80 | 954 |
Mix proportions arrived at by laboratory trials shall, in addition, be verified to be satisfactory under field conditions and necessary adjustments made. Field trial mixes shall be prepared for all grades of concrete, using samples of approved materials. Sampling and testing procedures shall be in accordance with para 4.11.
The concreting plant and means of transportation employed to make trial mixes and to transport them to representative distances shall be similar to the corresponding plant and transport to be used in the works. The optimum sequence of mixing of ingredients shall be established by trials. Mixing time may be longer than in normal grade concrete mixes.
The temperature of concrete at the time of placement shall not exceed 25°C. The temperature of concrete at the mixing stage should be lower, to allow for rise in temperature during transport. When considerable distance of transport is involved, particular attention should be paid to ensure retention of slump as targeted for placement.
Further mock-up trails or prototype testing may be carried out to ensure that the concrete can be satisfactorily placed and compacted, taking into account the location of placement and provision of reinforcement, and adjustments made in concrete mix design and/or detailing of reinforcement accordingly.
Provisions of Clause 302.9.1 of IRC:21 shall apply. Fully automatic, computer controlled batching and mixing plant shall be used.
High Performance Concrete containing silica fume is more cohesive than normal mixes hence, there is little or no bleeding and no bleed water to rise to the surface to offset water lost due to evaporation. Plastic shrinkage cracking is possible, if curing is not proper. Initial curing should commences soon after initial setting of concrete. Concrete should be covered with moist covers, opaque colour plastic sheets or suitable curing compound. Final moist curing should commence after final setting of concrete and continue for at least 14 days.
In order that the performance of the completed structure be consistent with the requirements and assumptions made during the planning and design, stringent quality assurance measures shall be taken. The construction should result in satisfactory strength, serviceability and long-term durability. In particular, it should be aimed to ensure uniformity and to lower the variability between batches of production, as evidenced by the standard deviation in test results.
The methods and procedures of Quality System shall be followed as per the guidelines contained in IRC:SP-47. Q-4 class of Quality Assurance shall be adopted for the ‘Materials’ and ‘Workmamship’ items.
Provisions of Clause 302.10 of IRC:21 shall apply.
Provisions of Clause 302.11 of IRC:21 shall apply.
Acceptance testing on site shall not be resticted to tests for compressive strength of concrete alone. Where durability of concrete is the main reason for adopting High Performance Concrete, Rapid Chloride Ion Permeability test as per ASTM C-1202 or AASHTO T-277 shall be carried out. The permissible value of chloride- ion permeability shall be less than 800 coulombs.
Additional durability tests, such as, Water Permeability test as per DIN:1048 Part 5-1991 or Initial Surface Absorption test as per BS: 1881 Part 55
can also be specified. The permissible values in such tests shall be decided taking into account the severity of the exposure conditions.
The properties and basic permissible stresses for concrete of grades upto M 60 shall be as given in Table 9 of IRC:21. For concrete of grades higher than M 60, properties of concrete, permissible stresses and design parameters given in IRC:18 and IRC:21 will not be applicable. Appropriate values may be obtained from specialized literature and/or International Codes of Practice.
REFERENCES
In this pulication reference to the following IRC, IS, BS, DIN Standards ASTM and AASHTO has been made. At the time of publication, the editions indicated were valid. All Standards are subject to revision and the parties to agreements based on these guidelines are encouraged to investigate the possiblitiy of applying the most recent editions of the Standards indicated below:
Codes and Specifications:
1. | IRC: 18-2000 | Design Criteria for Prestressed Concrete Road Bridges (Post-Tensioned Concrete) (Third Revision) |
2. | IRC :21-2000 | Standard Specifications and Code of practice for Road Bridges, Section-Ill Cement Concrete Plain & Reinforced, (Third Revision) |
3. | IRC:SP:47-1998 | Guidelines on Quality Systems for Road Bridges (Plain, Reinforced, Prestressed and Composite Concrete) |
4. | IS 383:1970 | Specificaton for Course and Fine Aggregates from Natural Sources for Concrete |
5. | IS 455:1989 | Specification for Porland Slag Cement |
6. | IS 1489-Pt. 1:1991 | Specification for Portland Pozzolana Cement-part 1 Flyash based |
7. | IS 1199:1959 | Methods of sampling for analysis of concrete. |
8. | IS 12089:1987 | Specificaion for Granulated slag for Manufacture of Portland Slag construction |
9. | IS 2386:1963 pt. 1-8 | Methods of test for aggregates for concrete |
10. | IS 3812:2003 | Specification for Flyash for use as Pozzolana and Admixture |
11. | IS 15388:2003 | Specifications for Silica fume |
12. | IS 8112:1989 | Specification for 43 Grade Ordinary Portland Cement |
13. | IS 9103:1999 | Concrete admixtures-specification |
14. | IS 12269:1987 | Specification for 53 grade Ordinary Portland Cement |
15. | IS 12330:1988 | Specification for Sulphate Resisting Portland Cement |
16. | IS 12600:1989 | Specification for Low heat Portland Cement |
17. | IS 8041:1990 | Specification for Rapid hardening Portland Cement |
18. | BS 1881 pt. 5-1970 | Testing Concrete methods for testing Hardened concrete for other than strength (current, patially replaced) |
19. | DIN 1048 pt. 5-1991 | Testing concrete testing of Hardened concrete (specimens prepared in mould) |
20. | ASTM C 1202: 1997 | Test method for electrical indication of concretes ability to resist chloride ion |
21. | AASHTO T 277-831 | Rapid Determination of the Chloride Permeability of Concrete |
Papers and Publications
1. ACI State-of-the-Art Report on High Strength Concrete, ACI 363R-84, 1984.
2. Strategic Highway Research Program, SHRP-C/FR-91-103, High Perfomance Concretes: A State-of-the-Art Report, 1991, NRC, Washington D.C., p. 233.
3. FTP, Condensed Silica Fume in Concrete, State-of-the-Art Report, FTP Commission on Concrete, Thomas Telford, London, 1988, p. 37.
4. Goodspeed, C.H., Vanikar, S.N. and Cook, Raymond, High Performance Concrete (HPC) Defined for Highway Structures, Concrete International, ACI, February 1996, p. 14.
5. Aitcin, Pierre-Claude, Jolicoeur, C. and Macgregor, J.G., Superplasticisers: How They Work and Why They Occasionally Don’t Concrete International, ACI, May 1994, pp. 45-52.6
6. Mullick, A.K., Area Review paper on High Performance Concrete, 64th Annual Session, Indian Roads Congress, Ahmedabad, January, 2004, pp.23-36.
7. Mullick, A.K. Silica Fume in Concrete for Performance Enhancement, Special Lecture in national Seminar on Performance Enhancement of Cement and Concrete by Use of Fly Ash, Slag, Silica Fume and Chemical Admixtures, New Delhi, Jan. 1998, Proc. pp. 25-44.
8. Basu, P.C., NPP Containment Structures: Indian Experience in Silica Fume based HPC, Indian Concrete Journal, October 2001, pp. 656-664.
9. Saini, S., Dhuri, S.S., Kanhere, D.K. and Momin, S.S., High Performance Concrete for an Urban Viaduct in Mumbai, ibid, pp. 634-640.
10. Rashid, M.A., Considerations in Using HSC in RC Flexural Members, Indian Concrete Journal, May 2004, pp. 20-28.
11. FHWA Manual High Performance Concrete-Structural Designers Guide, Deptt. of Transportation, March 2005.7