PREAMBLE (NOT PART OF THE STANDARD)

This library of books, audio, video, and other materials from and about India is curated and maintained by Public Resource. The purpose of this library is to assist the students and the lifelong learners of India in their pursuit of an education so that they may better their status and their opportunities and to secure for themselves and for others justice, social, economic and political.

This item has been posted for non-commercial purposes and facilitates fair dealing usage of academic and research materials for private use including research, for criticism and review of the work or of other works and reproduction by teachers and students in the course of instruction. Many of these materials are either unavailable or inaccessible in libraries in India, especially in some of the poorer states and this collection seeks to fill a major gap that exists in access to knowledge.

For other collections we curate and more information, please visit the Bharat Ek Khoj page. Jai Gyan!

END OF PREAMBLE (NOT PART OF THE STANDARD)

IRC:19-2005

STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS AND CODE OF PRACTICE FOR WATER BOUND MACADAM

(Third Revision)

Published by

THE INDIAN ROADS CONGRESS
Kama Koti Marg,
Sector 6, R.K. Puram, New Delhi - 110 022
2005

Price Rs. 100/-
(Packing & Postage Extra)

PERSONNEL OF THE HIGHWAYS SPECIFICATIONS AND STANDARDS COMMITTEE

(As on 10-12-2004)

1. V. Velayutham
(Convenor)
Addl. Director General, Ministry of Shipping, Road Transport & Highways, New Delhi
2. G. Sharan (Co-Convenor) Member (Tech), NHAI, New Delhi
3. Chief Engineer (R&B) S&R
(Member-Secretary)
Ministry of Shipping, Road Transport & Highways, New Delhi
Members
4. A.P. Bahadur Chief Engineer, Ministry of Shipping, Road Transport & Highways, New Delhi
5. R.K. Chakarabarty Chief Engineer Ministry of Shipping, Road Transport & Highways, New Delhi
6. P.K. Dutta Executive Director, Consulting Engg. Services (I) Pvt. Ltd., New Delhi
7. J.P. Desai Sr. Vice-President (Tech. Ser.), Gujarat Ambuja Cements Ltd., Ahmedabad
8. Dr. S.L. Dhingra Professor, Indian Institute of Technology, Mumbai
9. A.N. Dhodapkar Director, NITHE, NOIDA
10. D.P. Gupta DG (RD) & AS, MOST (Retd.), New Delhi
11. S.K. Gupta Chief Engineer, Uttaranchal PWD, Almora
12. R.K. Jain Chief Engineer (Retd.), Sonepat
13. Dr. S.S. Jain Professor & Coordinator (COTE), Indian Institute of Technology, Roorkee
14. Dr. L.R. Kadiyali Chief Executive, L.R. Kadiyali & Associates, New Delhi
15. Prabha Kant Katare Joint Director (Pl), National Rural Roads Dev. Agency (Min of Rural Dev.), New Delhi
16. J.B. Mathur Chief Engineer (Retd.), NOIDA
17. H.L. Meena Chief Engineer-cum-Addl. Secy. to the Govt. of Rajasthan, PWD, Jaipur
18. S.S. Momin Secretary (Works), Maharastra PWD, Mumbai
19. A.B. Pawar Secretary (Works) (Retd.), Pune
20. Dr. Gopal Ranjan Director, College of Engg. Roorkee
21. S.S. Rathore Secretary to the Govt. of Gujarat, R&B Department, Gandhinagar
22. Arghya Pradip Saha Sr. Consultant, New Delhi
23. S.C. Sharma DG (RD) & AS, MORT& H (Retd.), New Delhi
24. Dr. PK. Nanda Director, Central Road Research Institute, New Delhi
25. Dr. C.K. Singh Engineer in Chief-cum Addl. Comm cum Spl Secy. (Retd.) Ranchii
26. Nirmal Jit Singh Member (Tech.), National Highways Authority of India, New Delhi
27. A.V. Sinha Chief General Manager, National Highways Authority of India, New Delhi
28. N.K. Sinha DG (RD)&SS, MOSRT& H (Retd.), New Delhi
29 V.K. Sinha Chief Engineer, Ministry of Shipping, Road Transport & Highways, New Delhi
30. K.K. Sarin DG (RD) & AS, MOST (Retd.), New Delhi
31. T.P. Velayudhan Addl. D.G., Directorate General Border Roads, New Delhi
32. Maj. V.C. Verma Executive Director, Marketing, Oriental Structural Engrs. Pvt. Ltd, New Delhi
33. The Chief Engineer (NH) (B. Prabhakar Rao), R&B Department, Hyderabad
34. The Chief Engineer (Plg.) (S.B. Basu), Ministry of Shipping, Road Transport & Highways, New Delhi
35. The Chief Engineer (Mech) (V.K. Sachdev), Ministry of Shipping, Road Transport & Highways, New Delhi
36. The Chief Engineer (Mech) PWD, Kolkata
37. The Chief Engineer (NH) (Ratnakar Dash), Sachivalaya Marg, Bhubaneshwar
38. The Engineer-in-Chief (Tribhuvan Ram) U.P PWD, Lucknow
39. The Chief Engineer National Highways, PWD, Bangalore
Ex-Officio Members
40. President Indian Roads Congress(S.S. Momin), Secretary (Works), Mumbai
41. Director General (Road Development) & Special Secretary (Indu Prakash), Ministry of Shipping, Road Transport & Highways, New Delhi
42. Secretary Indian Roads Congress(R.S. Sharma), Indian Roads Congress, New Delhi
Corresponding Members
1. M.K. Agarwal Engineer-in-Chief, Haryana PWD (Retd.), Panchkula
2. Dr. C.E.G. Justo Emeritus Fellow, Bangalore University, Bangalore
3. M.D. Khattar Executive Director, Hindustan Construction Co. Ltd., Mumbai
4. Sunny C. Madhathil Director (Project), Bhagheeratha Engg. Ltd., Cochin
5. N.V. Merani Principal Secretary, Maharashtra PWD (Retd.), Mumbaiii

STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS AND CODE OF PRACTICE FOR WATER BOUND MACADAM

1. INTRODUCTION

1.1

This standard was originally published in 1966. The first revision of the standard was approved by the Specifications and Standards Committee in their meeting held on the 29th & 30th September, 1972, by the Executive Committee in their meeting held at Gandhinagar on the 25th November, 1972 and by the Council in their 79th meeting held at Gandhinagar on the 25th November, 1972 for publication. Following the decision of the IRC Council at its meeting held on the 28th August, 1976, the tolerance of surface evenness were revised on the basis of IRC Special Publication 16 “Surface Evenness of Highway Pavements” and the second revision of standard was published in May, 1977 which was further amended in March, 1987.

The decision to review and revise the code of practice was taken during meeting of Flexible Pavement Committee on 10th February, 2001. The task was assigned to Dr. P.K. Jain and K. Sitaramanjaneyulu, Scientists of Central Road Research Institute. The draft of the revised code was presented and discussed in the meeting of Flexible Pavement Committee held on 17th May, 2002 and it was decided that the draft document may be modified in the light of the comments of the members and sent to Convenor, Flexible Pavement Committee for forwarding to Highways Specifications & Standards (HSS) Committee. Dr. P.K. Jain, and Shri K. Sitaramanjaneyulu modified the document and forwarded to Convenor, Flexible Pavement Committee. The draft standard was reviewed by the Flexible Pavement Committee (constituted in January, 2003) in its meeting held on 1st August, 2003 and authorized a Group consisting of Shri S.C. Sharma, Shri K.K. Singal and Dr. P.K. Jain to finalise the document incorporating the suggestions of the members and forward the same to HSS Committee. The draft standard was finalised by the Group in its meeting held on 7th May, 2004 and then sent for consideration of HSS Committee.

Members of Flexible Pavement Committee up to December 2002

S.C. Sharma ... Convenor
Secretary R&B, Gujarat. (S.S. Rathore) ... Co-Convenor
Dr. S.S. Jain ... Member-Secretary
Members
D. Basu Prof. C.G. Swaminathan
Dr. A.K. Bhatnagar C.E. (R) S&R, T&T (Jai Prakash)
S.K. Bhatnagar
Dr. Animesh Das Rep. of DG(W),E-in-C Br., AHQ
Dr. M.P Dhir (Col. R.N. Malhotra)
D.P. Gupta Rep. of DGBR (Hargun Das)
Dr. L.R. Kadiyali Head, FP Dn., CRRI
Dr. C.E.G. Justo (Dr. Sunil Bose)
H.L. Meena Director, HRS, Chennai
Prof. B.B. Pandey
R.K. Pandey
Corresponding Members
Sukomal Chakrabarti S.K. Nirmal
Dr. P.K. Jain Smt. A.P Joshi
R.S. Shukla1

Members of Flexible Pavement Committee reconstituted w.e.f. January 2003

S.C. Sharma .... Convenor
Chief Engineer (Roads), .... Co-Convenor
PWD, Guwahati
Dr. S.S. Jain .... Member-Secretary
Members
Aran Bajaj Chief Engineer (R&B) S&R
Sukomal Chakraborty MORT&H
Dr. Animesh Das A Rep. of IOC, Faridabad
D.P. Gupta (B.R. Tyagi)
Dr. L.R. Kadiyali A Rep. of E-in-C’s Branch
D. Mukhopadhyay (Col. V.K.P. Singh)
Dr. B.B. Pandey A Rep. of DGBR
R.K. Pandey (P.K. Mahajan)
R.S. Shukla Area Co-ordinator (FP Dn.), CRRI
K.K. Singal (Dr. Sunil Bose)
Dr. A. Veeraragavan Director, HRS, Chennai
Corresponding Members
Dr. P.K. Jain S.K. Nirmal
Dr. C.E.G. Justo The Manager (Bitumen), HPC,
J.T. Nashikkar Mumbai (Vijay Kr. Bhatnagar)

The draft document finalised by the Flexible Pavement Committee was considered by the Highways Specifications and Standards Committee in its meeting held on 10th December, 2004 and approved with certain modifications.

The Council in its 173rd meeting held on 8th January, 2005 at Bangalore approved the document for publication subject to modification in light of the comments/suggestions given by the participants. The document was modified suitably by Shri S.C. Sharma, Convenor, Flexible Pavement Committee and printed by IRC as Third Revision of IRC: 19.

1.2. Symbols and Abbreviations

1.2.1

For the purpose of this Standard, the following symbols for SI units and abbreviations shall apply.

1.2.1.1 Symbols for SI Units
kN kilo-newton
m metre
mm millimetre
1.2.1.2 Abbreviations
BS British Standards
IRC Indian Roads Congress
IS Indian Standard by Bureau of Indian Standards
LL Liquid Limit
PI Plasticity Index
WBM Water Bound Macadam

1.3. References

1.3.1

The following IRC, IS and BS standards contain provisions, which, through reference in the text, constitute provisions of this standard. At the time of publication, the editions indicated were valid. All standards are subject to revision and parties to agreements based on this standard are encouraged tb investigate the possibility of applying2 the most recent editions of the standard indicated below :

No. Title
IRC:SP:16-2004 Guidelines for Surface Evenness of Highway Pavements (First Revision)
IS 460:Part 1 : 1985 Specification for test sieves: Part 1 cloth test sieves (Third Revision)
IS 460:Part 2 : 1985 Specification for test sieves: Part 2 Perforated plate test sieves (Third Revision)
IS 460:Part 3 : 1985 Specification for test sieves: Part 3 Methods of examination of apertures of test sieves (Third Revision)
IS 2386:Part 1-1963 Method of Test for Aggregates for Concrete - Part 1: Particle Size and Shape (Reaffirmed 2002 Amds. 3)
IS 2386:Part 3-1963 Method of Test for Aggregates for Concrete - Part 3: Specific gravity, density, voids, absorption and bulking (Reaffirmed 2002)
IS 2386:Part 4-19 Method of Test for Aggregates for Concrete - Part 4:........
IS 2430:1986 Methods for Sampling of Aggregates for Concrete (First Revision) (Reaffirmed 2000)
IS 5640:1970 Method of test for determining aggregate impact value of soft coarse aggregates (Reaffirmed 1998 Amds.1)
IS 14685-1999 ........
BS 1047:1983 Specification for air-cooled blast furnace slag aggregate for use in construction (Replaced by EN 12620)

2. SCOPE

This Standard covers the specification for construction of Water Bound Macadam as Subbase, Base Course and Surfacing Course of a road pavement.

2.1. Description

2.1.1

Water Bound Macadam (WBM) shall consist of clean, crushed coarse aggregates mechanically interlocked by rolling, and voids thereof filled with screening and binding material with the assistance of water, laid on a prepared subgrade, sub-base, base or existing pavement as the case may be. WBM may be used as a subbase, base course or surfacing course depending upon category of road. In each case, it shall be constructed in accordance with the specifications given in this Code and in conformity with the lines, grades and cross-sections shown on the drawings or as directed.

2.1.2

The WBM shall not be laid on an existing bituminous top surface without scarifying or providing adequate measures for proper bond and drainage at the interface of existing bituminous surface and WBM layer.3

2.1.3

WBM should not be laid directly over a silty or clayey subgrade. It is advisable to lay a suitable intervening granular layer.

3. MATERIALS

3.1.Coarse Aggregates - General Requirements

3.1.1

Coarse aggregates shall consist of clean crushed or broken stone, crushed slag, over burnt brick (Jhama) metal or naturally occurring aggregates such as kankar and laterite of requisite quality as stated hereinafter. Use of crushable type aggregates should generally be restricted to lower layers of the pavement. The aggregates shall conform to the physical requirements set forth in Table 1.

3.1.2.Crushed or broken stone :

Crushed or broken stone shall be hard, durable and free from flat, elongated, soft and disintegrated particles, dirt or other deleterious materials.

3.1.3 Crushed slag :

Crushed slag shall be manufactured from air-cooled blast furnace slag. It shall be angular in shape, reasonably uniform in quality and density, and generally free from soft, elongated and flat pieces, dirt or other deleterious material. Crushed slag shall not weigh less than 11.2 kN per m3 and the glassy material in it shall not be in excess of 20 per cent. It should also comply with the following requirements.

(i) Chemical stability : To comply with requirement of Appendix of BS : 1047
(ii) Sulphur content
(IS 14685-1999 )
: Maximum 2 per cent
(iii) Water absorption
(IS 2386, Part 3)
: Maximum 10 per cent
Table 1: Physical Requirements of Coarse Aggregates for WBM
SI. No. Type of Construction Test + Test Method equirements
1. Sub-base Los Angeles Abrasion Value* or IS 2386 (Part 4) Max. 50%
Aggregate Impact Value* IS 2386 (Part 4) or IS 5640** Max. 40%
2. Base course with bituminous surfacing Los Angeles Abrasion Value* or IS 2386 (Part 4) Max. 40%
Aggregate Impact Value* IS 2386 (Part 4) or lS 5640** Max. 30%
Flakiness Index*** IS 2386 (Part 1) Max. 20%
3. Surfacing course Los Angeles Abrasion Value* or IS 2386 (Part 4) Max. 40%
Aggregate Impact Value* IS 2386 (Part 4) or IS 5640** Max. 30%
Flakiness Index*** IS 2386 (Part 1) Max. 15%

Notes :

* Aggregates may satisfy the requirements of either the Los Angeles test or Aggregate Impact Value Test.

* * Aggregates like brick metal, kankar, laterite, etc., which get softened in presence of water should invariably be tested for impact value under wet conditions in accordance with IS 5640.
*** The requirement of Flakiness Index shall be enforced only in the case of crushed/ broken stone and crushed slag.
+ Samples for tests shall be representative of the materials to be used and collected in accordance-with the procedure set forth in IS 2430.4

3.1.4 Overburnt (Jhama) brick metal:

B rick metal shall be made out of overbunt bricks or brick bats and be free from dust and other deleterious materials.

3.1.5 Kankar :

Kankar shall be tough having a blue almost opalescent fracture. It shall not contain any clay in the cavities between nodules.

3.1.6 Laterite :

Laterite shall be hard, compact, heavy and of dark colour. Light coloured sandy laterities, as also those containing ochreous clay shall not be used.

3.2 Coarse Aggregates-Size and Grading Requirement

3.2.1

The coarse aggregates shall conform to one of the grading given in Table 2. Grading 1 shall be used only for sub-base courses, with a compacted layer thickness of 100 mm.

3.2.2

The size of aggregates to be used would depend on the type of aggregates available and compacted thickness of the layer.

3.2.3

The crushable type aggregates like brick metal, kankar and laterite shall also generally satisfy the grading requirements of Table 2. Relaxation in grading may be permitted for such materials with the permission of the Engineer.

3.3 Screenings

3.3.1

Screenings to fill voids in the coarse aggregates shall generally be of the same material as the coarse aggregates. However, from economic considerations, predominantly non-plastic material such as kankar, moorum or gravel (other than river-borne rounded aggregate) may also be used for this purpose provided that the liquid limit and plasticity index of such material are below 20 and 6 respectively and the fraction passing 75 micron sieve does not exceed 10 per cent.

3.3.2

As Tar as possible, screenings shall conform to the grading shown in Table 3. Screenings of type A shall be used in conjunction with coarse aggregates of grading 1, and of type B with coarse aggregates of grading 3. With coarse

Table 2 : Size and Grading Requirement of Coarse Aggregate for WBM
Grading No. Size Range and compacted thickness for layer Sieve Designation (IS 460) Per cent by Weight Passing the Sieve
1 90 mm to 45 mm (100 mm) 125 mm 100
90 mm 90-100
63 mm 25-60
45 mm 0-15
22.4 mm 0-5
2 63 mm to 45 mm (75 mm) 90 mm 100
63 mm 90-100
53 mm 25-75
45 mm 0-15
22.4 mm 0-5
3 53 mm to 22.4 mm (75 mm) 63 mm 100
53 mm 90-100
45 mm 65-90
22.4 mm 0-10
11.2 mm 0-55
Table 3 : Grading Requirements of Screenings for WBM
Grading Classification Size of Screenings (IS 460) Sieve Designation Passing the Sieve Percent by Weight
A 13.2 mm 13.2 mm 100
11.2 mm 95-100
5.6 mm 15-35
180 micron 0-10
B 11.2 mm 11.2 mm 100
5.6 mm 90-100
180 micron 15-35

aggregates of grading 2, either type A or type B screenings may be used. For crushable screenings like moorum and gravel, the grading given in Table 3 shall not be binding.

3.3.3

The use of screenings may be dispensed with when crushable type soft aggregates such as brick metal, kankar, laterite, etc., are used as coarse aggregates, as these are likely to get crushed to a certain extent during rolling.

3.4 Binding Material

3.4.1

Binding material to be used for WBM as filler shall consist of a fine grained material passing 100 per cent through 425 micron sieve and possessing PI value of 4-8 when the WBM is used as a surfacing course, and less than 6 when the WBM is adopted as a sub-base/base course with bituminous surfacing. If limestone formations are available nearby, limestone dust or kankar nodules may be used as binding material.

3.4.2

Application of binding material may not be necessary, where the screenings consist of crushable type material like moorum or gravel. However, for WBM used as a surfacing course, where the PI of crushable type screenings is less than 4, application of a small quantity of binding material having PI of 4-6 would be required at the top. The quantity of screenings could be reduced correspondingly.

3.5 Quantities of Material

3.5.1

Approximate quantities of coarse aggregates and screenings required for 100 mm compacted thickness of WBM sub-base course are given in Table 4. Likewise, quantities of materials for WBM sub-base/base or surfacing

Table 4 : Approximate Quantities of Coarse Aggregates and Screenings Required for 100 mm compacted thickness of WBM Sub-base Course per 10 m2
Coarse Aggregates Screenings
Classification Size Range
(mm)
Loose Quantity
(m3)
Stone Screenings Crushable Type Such as Moorum or Gravel
Grading classification and size Loose quantity
(m3)
Properties and size Loose quantity
(m3)
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
Grading 1 90 to 45 1.21 to 1.43 Type A 13.2 mm 0.27 to 0.30 LL<20, PI<6 Per cent passing 75 micron <10 0.30 to 0.326
Table 5 : Approximate Quantities of Coarse Aggregates and Screenings Required for 75 nun compacted thickness of WBM Sub-base/Base Course/Surfacing Course per 13 m2
Coarse Aggregates Screenings
Classification Size Range Loose QuantityStone Screenings Crushable Type Such as Moorum or Gravel
Grading classification and size Loose quantity or

(mm)

(m3)
WBM subbase/base course (m3) WBM surfacing course*
(m3)
Properties and size
(m3)
Loose quantity
(m3)
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Grading 2 63 to 45 0.91 to 1.07 Type A, 13.2mm 0.12 to 0.15 0.10 to 0.12 LL<20, PI<6 Percent passing 75 micron <10 0.22 to 024
Grading 2 63 to 45 Type B, 11.2 mm 0.20 to 022 0.16 to 0.18 -do-
Grading 3 53 to 22.4 0.18 to 021 0.14 to 0.17 -do-
*Quantities in Col. 6 are 80 per cent of those in Col. 5 as larger quantity of binding material will need to be used where the WBM is to act as a surfacing course (see Clause 3.5.2.).

course for a compacted thickness of 75 mm are given in Table 5.

3.5.2

The quantity of binding material where it is to be used (see Clause 3.4.), will depend on the type of screenings and function of WBM. Generally, the quantity required for 75 mm compacted thickness will be 0.06-0.09 m3/10 m2 in the case of WBM sub-base/base course and 0.10-0.15 m3/10 m2 when the WBM is to function as a surfacing course. For 100 mm thickness, the quantity needed will be 0.08-0.10 m3/10 m2 for sub-base course.

3.5.3

The above mentioned quantities should be taken as a guide only, for estimation of quantities for construction, etc.

4 CONSTRUCTION PROCEDURE

4.1 Preparation of Foundation for Receiving WBM Layer

4.1.1

The subgrade, sub-base or base to receive the WBM course shall be prepared to the required grade and camber and cleaned of all dust, dirt and other extraneous matter. Any ruts or soft yielding places that have appeared due to improper drainage, service under traffic or other reasons shall be corrected and rolled until firm.

4.1.2

Where the WBM is to be laid on an existing un-surfaced road, the surface shall be scarified and re-shaped to the required grade and camber as necessary. Weak places shall be strengthened, corrugations removed and depressions and potholes made good with suitable material before spreading the coarse aggregates for WBM.

4.1.3

As far as possible, laying of WBM course over an existing bituminous surface should be avoided since it will cause problems of proper bond and internal drainage of the pavement at the interface of two courses. It is desirable to completely remove the existing thin surfacing of bituminous layer, where WBM is proposed to be laid over it. Where the intensity of rain is low and interface drainage facility is efficient, WBM can be laid over existing thin bituminous surfacing by7

cutting 50 mm x 50 mm (minimum) furrows at 1 metre intervals at 45 degrees to the centre line of the carriageway before proceeding with the laying of WBM.

The direction and depth of furrows shall be such that they provide adequate bondage and also serve to drain water to the existing granular base course beneath the existing bituminous surface.

4.1.4

In all cases, the foundation shall be kept well drained during the construction operations.

4.2

Provision of Lateral Confinement of Aggregates

For construction of WBM, arrangement should be made for the lateral confinement of aggregates. This shall be done by building adjoining shoulders alongwith WBM layers. The practice of constructing WBM in a trench section excavated in the finished formation must be completely avoided.

4.3 Spreading of Coarse Aggregates

4.3.1

The coarse aggregates shall be spread uniformly and evenly upon the prepared base in required quantities from stockpiles along the side of the road or directly from vehicles. In no case shall these be dumped in heaps directly on the area where these are to be laid nor shall their hauling over a partly completed base be permitted. The aggregates shall be spread to proper profile by using templates placed across the road about 6 m apart. Where possible, approved mechanical devices shall be used to spread the aggregates uniformly so as to minimize the need for their manipulation by hand.

4.3.2

The WBM Course shall be constructed in layers such that thickness of each compacted layer is not more than 100 mm for grading 1 (Table 2). The compacted thickness of layer shall be 75 mm for grading 2 and grading 3. Each layer shall be tested by depth blocks. No segregation of large or fine particles shall be allowed. The coarse aggregates as spread shall be of uniform gradation with no pockets of fine material.

4.3.3

The coarse aggregates shall normally not be spread in lengths exceeding three days average work ahead of the rolling and bonding of the preceding section.

4.4 Rolling

4.4.1

After the laying of coarse aggregates, these shall be compacted to full width by rolling with either three wheel-power roller of 80 to 100 kN capacity or an equivalent vibratory roller.

4.4.2

The rolling shall begin from edges with roller running forward and backward until the edges have been firmly compacted. The roller shall then progress gradually from edges to the centre, parallel to the centre line of the road and overlapping uniformly each preceding rear wheel track by one half width and shall continue until the entire area of the course has been rolled by the rear wheel. Rolling shall continue until the road metal is thoroughly keyed and the creeping of stone ahead of the roller is no longer visible. Slight sprinkling of water may be done, if required.

4.4.3

On super elevated portions of the road, rolling shall commence from the lower edge and progress gradually towards the upper edge of the pavement.

4.4.4

Rolling shall not be done when the subgrade is soft or yielding or when it causes a wave-like motion in the base course or subgrade. If irregularities develop during rolling, which exceed 12 mm when tested with a 3 m straight edge, the surface shall be loosened and aggregates added or removed as required before rolling again so as to achieve all uniform surface conforming to the desired cross section and grade. The surface shall also be checked transversely by template for camber, and any irregularities corrected in the manner described above. In no case shall the use of screenings to make up depressions be permitted.

4.4.5

Material, which gets crushed excessively during compaction or become segregated shall be removed and replaced with suitable aggregates.8

4.5 Application of Screenings

4.5.1

After coarse aggregates have been rolled as per Clause 4.4, screenings to fill interstices shall be applied gradually over the surface. Dry rolling shall be done when the screenings are being spread so that the jarring effect of roller causes them to settle into the voids of the coarse aggregate. The screenings shall not be dumped in piles but applied uniformly in successive thin layers either by the spreading motion of hand shovels, mechanical spreaders, or directly from trucks. Trucks plying over the base course to spread screenings shall be equipped with pneumatic tyres and operated such as not to disturb the coarse aggregates.

4.5.2

The screenings shall be applied at a slow rate in three or more applications as necessary. This shall be accompanied by rolling and brooming. Either mechanical brooms/hand brooms or both may be used. In no case shall the screenings be applied so fast and thick as to form cakes or ridges on the surface making the filling of voids difficult or preventing the direct bearing of roller on the coarse aggregates. The spreading, rolling and brooming of screenings shall be taken up on sections, which can be completed within one day’s operation. Damp and wet screenings shall not be used in any circumstances.

4.6 Sprinkling of Water and Grouting

4.6.1

After application of screenings, the surface shall be copiously sprinkled with water, swept and rolled. Hand brooms shall be used to sweep the wet screenings into the voids, and to distribute them evenly. The sprinkling, sweeping and rolling operations shall be continued and additional screenings applied, where necessary until the coarse aggregates are bonded and firmly set and a grout of screenings and water forms ahead of the wheels of the roller. Care shall be taken that the base or subgrade does not get damaged due to addition of excessive quantities of water during the construction.

4.6.2

In case of lime treated soil sub-base, construction of WBM on top of it can cause excessive water to flow down to the lime treated sub-base before it has picked up enough strength (is still “green”) and thus cause damage to the subbase layer. The laying of WBM layer in such cases shall be done after the sub-base attains adequate strength, as directed by the Engineer.

4.7 Application of Binding Material

4.7.1

After the application of screenings as per Clauses 4.5 and 4.6, binding material where it is required to be used (see Clause 3.4), shall be applied at an uniform and slow rate in two or more successive thin layers. After each application of binding material, the surface shall be copiously sprinkled with water and the resulting slurry swept in with hand brooms/mechanical brooms or both so as to fill the voids properly. This shall be followed by rolling with 80-100 kN roller during which water shall be applied to the wheels to wash down the binding material that may get stuck to them. The spreading of binding material, sprinkling of water, sweeping with brooms and rolling shall continue until the slurry of binding material and water forms a wave ahead of the wheels of moving roller.

4.8 Setting and Drying

4.8.1

After final compaction of the course, the layer shall be allowed to dry overnight. Next morning, hungry spots shall be filled with screenings or binding material, lightly sprinkled with water if necessary, and rolled. No traffic shall be allowed till the macadam sets.

4.8.2

In the case of WBM base course to be provided with bituminous surfacing, the latter shall be laid only after the WBM course is completely dry and before allowing any traffic on it.

5. SURFACE EVENNESS OF WBM COURSE

5.1

The surface unevenness of completed WBM course in longitudinal and transverse directions shall be within the limits specified in Table 6.

5.2

The longitudinal profile shall be checked with a 3-metre long straight edge at the middle of9

Table 6 : Permissible Surface Unevenness for WBM Courses

SI.

No.

Size Range of Coarse Aggregates Longitudinal Profile measured with a 3-Metre Straight Edge Transverse Profile
Max. permissible Surface unevennessMaximum number of undulations permitted in any 300-metre length, exceeding Max. permissible variation from specified profile under camber template
mm 12 mm 10 mm mm
1. 90-45 mm 15 30 12
2. 63-45 mm or 53-22.4 mm 12 30 8

each traffic lane along a line parallel to the centre line of the road. The transverse profile shall be checked with a series of three camber templates at intervals of 10 m. For detailed guidance in this respect, reference may be made to IRC:SP:16-2004 “Guidelines for Surface Evenness of Highway Pavements (First Revision)”.

6. RECTIFICATION OF DEFECTIVE CONSTRUCTION

Where the surface irregularity of the WBM courses exceeds the tolerances given in Table 6 or where the course is otherwise defective due to sub-grade soil mixing with the aggregates, the layer to its full thickness shall be scarified over the affected area, reshaped with added material, or removed and replaced with fresh material as applicable, and recompacted in accordance with Clause 4. The area treated in the aforesaid manner shall not be less than 10 m2. In no case shall depressions be filled up with screenings or binding material.

7. CONSTRUCTION OF WBM OVER NARROW WIDTHS

Where the WBM course is to be constructed in narrow widths for widening of an existing pavement, the existing shoulders should be excavated to their full depth and width up to the subgrade level except where the widening specifications envisage laying of a stabilised-soil subbase using in-situ operations in which case the same should be removed only up to the sub-base level. The construction of WBM shall be carried out as per the procedure prescribed in Clause 4.

8. MAINTENANCE OF WBM WEARING COURSES

8.1

The successful performance of WBM as a surfacing course depends to a large extent on timely maintenance. Maintenance measures for this can be considered under three heads: periodic patching of potholes along with removal of ruts and depressions, blinding of the surface, and surface renewals.

8.1.1 Patching of pot-holes along with removal of ruts and depressions :

Potholes, ruts and other depressions should be drained of water and cut to regular shape with vertical sides. All the loose and disintegrated material shall be removed and the exposed surfaces swept clean. The holes/depressions shall then be filled with salvaged coarse aggregates mixed with sufficient quantity of fresh aggregates and recompacted as normal WBM to operations described in Clause 4 so that the patched area merges with the adjoining surface. Where the area so treated is small, hand rammers may be used for compaction instead of rollers.

8.1.2 Blinding of surface :

Blinding of the surface shall be resorted to periodically as soon as the blinding material applied earlier has been eroded away due to a traffic or weather action10

and the surface has started showing signs of ravelling. Blinding operations shall consist of application of binding material in thin layers and grouting in accordance with the procedure given in Clause 4.7.

8.1.3 Surface Renewal :

WBM wearing course shall be renewed when the surface is worn out, is corrugated and badly ravelled or has a profusion of potholes and depressions which can not be treated economically with patching or blinding operations.

For renewal, the existing surface shall be scarified to a depth of 50-75 mm and the resulting material removed to berms for screening to salvage the usable coarse aggregates. The exposed pavement shall be scarified again at high spots so as to ensure proper grade and camber. The salvaged coarse aggregates mixed with sufficient quantity of fresh aggregates (usually between one half to one third of the quantity of salvaged aggregates) shall then be used to construct a new WBM course in accordance with Clause 4.11